Report any issue with "No results found"

These are lost scriptures discarded from the canon of self-proclaimed contemporary Christian establishments. WHO WERE THE GNOSTICS? Knowledge – Strong's Greek: 1108. γνῶσις (gnósis) This article aims to help the investigating reader understand the primary scriptural proofs and question the alleged historical evidence that the "contemporary scholars," repeatedly present to their audience to discredit the writings of the 1st Century believers. These are lost scriptures discarded from the canon of the contemporaneous self-appointed Christian establishments. A believing-inspired student of these scriptures will need to reason with the Mind to comprehend the spiritual meanings of these scriptures frequently poorly translated by paid laborers. To do so, one will also have to research the Greek terms that scholars left untranslated, even confronting foreign expressions, and difficulty arises when ascertaining their meaning and intent. In interpreting His profound letters, it is essential to understand the literary and linguistic styles of the original writers and the developmental, factual, and historical elements of the generation in which they were written. If we do not take a moment to consider and examine them, we can misappropriate their purpose and intended audiences. The Firm entrusts these paid laborers with these tasks: to translate the scriptures ("codices") found in Egypt, determine their authenticity, and actuate their ages–determined by " educated guesses" influenced by the Irenaeus-curse. Paid laborers often morph the relevancy of these writings with modern applications according to current doctrines, misinterpreting them then rejecting the manuscript written. When they try to do so, nonbeliever paid laborers of the establishment will default to applying their guided misinterpretation to their standard translation method. Even by canonical authors – which explain why one finds these 1st Century writings of believers with titles given by the paid laborers, cursing them as false, as "Pseudoepigrapha" – and directly denying the authors reporting them to have written them in their language. After denying their author and validation, these scholars next miscalculate dates for these and publish them with copyrights in the hope of preventing its future vindication as genuine. Lost in the process of their eliminating scriptures which they disapprove, is a lack of appreciation for Yâ-hwéh Yâhuwshúa's love for His recycling people with higher knowledge He gives, which the modern Christian, centuries later, has no intimate connection. Before explaining the controversy, to simply answer the question, a "gnostic " is a derogatory term for a first-century true follower of Yâ-hwéh Yâhuwshúa.` Today, whoever searches the establishment to answer this question finds institutions of paid laborers , the "contemporary scholars," as mentioned previously of trained-tamed pupils of the establishments' doctrines misunderstandings. These are the legacy of the enemies of the "early church," struggling to answer the curious question of Gnosticism—still maligning it as satanist, just as the satanist "church fathers" did. Even the rubric "Gnosticism" is a misnomer , as it is a modern term that present time scholars have invented rather than defining' a historical event. The "Gnostics" were the early groups of believers, being the thousands of followers of Yâhuwshúa`, whom the satanic establishment's "Church Fathers" ("the Firm") and today's paid laborers ("contemporary scholars") slandered as being deviant or heretical, with the sobriquet "know it all" – slandering them as 'Gnostics.' In the ancient world, first-century believers who acknowledged Truth ("Gnostics") represented a form of belief that had exposed the satanism in "Judaism" and "the Firm" and their falsehoods. Because the followers of Yâhuwshúa` had a much clearer understanding of Yâhuwshúa` 's instructions which they received in person from His mouth; they passed along verbally the Testimony of Yâ-hwéh Yâhuwshúa`, and inspired by the Spirit, and possessed the Mind of the Anointed. They learned how to crucify the flesh and denounce worldly things and thus yearned for more spiritual food or knowledge. To avoid early persecution by "the Firm," they gathered in secret places, at times at each other's home, apart from the synagogues. His believers shared and wrote wisdom far beyond the comprehension of the archons (demons aka e xtraterrestrials) and their followers, the Jews or those still being called "Christians" who had lost the knowledge of His names because of Jewish censorship or satanist accusations of "Judaizing." In the same way, as the archons envied the initially inspired dirt-man ("adam"), whose wisdom they could not comprehend, so too the archon-led dedicated themselves to casting down whoever has the Spirit. Thus the Jews and those still being called "Christians" who lost His names also envied and hated and murdered the "Gnostics" they could not understand and wrote slander about them, which is the surviving epigraphic historical record. Most of the inspired writings of the early believers in Yâhuwshúa` were destroyed by these archon authorities, so Yâhuwshúa` was Who led them to store their inspired writings on papyrus and bury them in jars, time-capsules for the unshakeable generation to come today to receive them, who by selection equipped with His true names, thus the Spirit and His will to restore them and comprehend the higher knowledge (gnosis) within them. Therefore, the ones He meant to have this knowledge are not dissuaded by His enemies' slander against these writings, modern and ancient. The latter paint themselves as legitimate followers to the masses, just as they did back then. The accounts of the suppression of these alternative scriptures read like an adventure novel – book burnings, secret meetings – of small groups found out by the "authorities," exiles, executions, and persecutions. Every TRUE believer in Yâhuwshúa` knew and knows that the end-result of their path on The Way is physical persecution (death), once our mission is complete, and that their written witnessed accounts of what they see or ever experienced with Yâhuwshúa,` then or now, receives the same awful treatment. The most extensive suppression of early Christian literature began when Constantine became emperor of Rome. Constantine declared a coded, modified, watered-down version of the Truth to be the approved religion for the decaying Roman Empire. Today, we know it as Christianity, the impure religion they amalgamated with satanic solar-worship and various idols in the process of conversion that occurred over several years, from his initial victory in 312 A.D. to the final defeat of rivals (True believers) in 324 A.D. In 325 A. D., Constantine convened the Council of Nicaea to decide from a selection of scriptures to form the 'canonical books.' They eliminated scriptures which they would suppress and approved others that would become the standards of the establishment's Church, which later was usurped by the Roman Catholic Church. For many years the Council attacked the inspired scriptures they disapproved. Indeed, even bishops at the Council of Nicaea who disagreed with Constantine's choices were exiled on the spot. One such example is Origen, a bishop of Rome, who wrote compelling interpretations of what he received as Truth, possibly from believers, at that time. However, the suppression of the inspired scriptures was unsuccessful as we know some texts have survived and passed on since ancient times. Many scraps and fragments turned up in various places over the years, though hardly a significant number and the Irenaeus' curse surfaced along with them. So, today's establishment followers, upon finding satanic Irenaeus' commentary slandering these inspired scriptures, instead of thinking for themselves, continued the slander, further proving their satanism. Another way the adversary smears the first-century followers of Yâ-hwéh Yâhuwshúa` which the authorities of this world calls "Gnostics," is by accusing them of being satanists. The adversary arranged for his own Firm, the contemporary Jewish scholars, who do not believe in the Testimony nor His names, who do not have His Spirit nor access to His Mind, to be the very first to obtain access to the manuscripts of these "Gnostics," so they might translate them poorly and hide the higher knowledge from most readers. Then the adversary brought his weakest followers to study these poor translations and completely misunderstand them to become dedicated satanists, calling themselves "Gnostics." This made "Gnosticism" become synonymous with "satanism" in the world's eyes to discourage any further study of these scriptures by believers. They made things much worse for prospective Christians examining their poor translations by adding their own very wrong illustrations of their interpretations when no such images existed in the original manuscripts. Their archon-level of understanding of various satanic religions misled them to assign similar satanic imagery from those religions to the actual spiritual concepts in the codices. With their mistranslations, imagery, and confusion, these self-proclaimed modern-day "Gnostics," being satanists, smear the misunderstood inspired authors of the codices and scriptures, falsely, as being satanic. Another hurdle Christians find challenging to overcome is reconciling the differences in the accounts in the inspired "gnostic" writings compared to that of the establishment's canon of scriptures. All inspired scripture agrees, and this is the case when comparing "gnostic" writings when adequately translated, to all canonical scriptures, when decoded and adequately translated. However, neither has been fully restored and published for public access. The general public is only being given the satanic establishment's approved versions. The best earlier manuscripts are jealously guarded, frequently as private stash, from their access by the elite satanic scholars, frequently Jewish. The satanists have long known and practiced the strategy that they become their opposition to control their opposition. So by eliminating the true Testimony of Yâ-hwéh Yâhuwshúa` from the writings and oral transmission through these persecutions and book-burnings, they established their satanic terms to be used in their version of the Christian religion. Moreover, they positioned themselves comfortably in its leadership positions, collecting power and authority to themselves, inventing positions beyond the acceptable "elder" and "attendant," such as "bishop" (supervisor/overseer) and "father" and "priest," all of which belong to Yâ-hwéh Yâhuwshúa`, not us. With these usurped authority positions, they misled the majority. They held them mainly controlled until the "Protestant Reformation," when they were mainly freed to scatter and pasture themselves for 500 years, from 1521 to 2021. However, in the 1st and 2nd centuries, Christianity's beginnings were not controlled by a material structure, "church," or a single hierarchy, or a single body. 1st-century believers, the "gnostics," having similar freedom before the later self-appointed satanic authorities, faced similar divisions (or denominations) in their beliefs as we do today within the Body of our Anointed. This explains why a few surviving writings of theirs are not inspired. Most of the "gnostic" writings latter copies that survive have apparently had the names of Yâ-hwéh Yâhuwshúa` omitted. So to know which are truly inspired requires deeper understanding to which contemporary scholars are not privy, as they also do not profess His names, thus not having His Spirit nor Mind, thus not being able to comprehend the higher knowledge over their archon-level. Modern Christians also would agree and name at least two or more Christian denominations today as cults and are nothing more than false Christians who deny one or more of the essentials of the Christian faith. Paulus admitted some were preaching the glad tidings 'not purely' and gave praise even for knowing the plan and purpose. However, satanism instead uniformly seeks to kill off its opponents, all varieties of Christianity, especially ones closest to the Truth, with their writings, before they overcome satan with the true Testimony and are out of their reach. This is why satanists had to eliminate the Testimony from the "Gnostics" before they became vulnerable to their authority. Any religion killing is satanist since death is a tool of the adversary. This is why some members from the satanic Firm, such as Irenaeus, silenced dissident voices because those did not endorse the kind of "Christianity" that was their own misled view of "truth." The satanic Firm that created the Roman Catholic Church also teaches that all other Christian denominations are not true churches; an unauthentic assembly viewed as suffering from 'defects.' So as you see, "Heresy" is defined as incorrect thinking and practice, and "orthodoxy" (straight-preference) is appropriate thinking and practice, terms first coined by Irenaeus and both are relative. Who was "orthodox" or a "heretic" depended upon where the observer was standing. Generally, to mainstream or apostolic Christian, one of their own is considered conventional ("orthodox"), and everyone else is a heretic. To the satanic Judaism, their secretive Talmud similarly defines everyone not Jewish, as heathens, and it is legal for them to kill at their will. Anyone in modern times joining in on the Irenaeus bandwagon of bashing "Gnosticism" in its purer form, of the first-century believers in Yâ-hwéh Yâhuwshúa`, is joining the adversary in slandering the true believers in Him. "Run! Run from the paid laborers of satan who require you to "help" support their mission through monetary donations, offerings, or by purchasing scripture translations, books, or full access to their content, all in the name of increasing your knowledge. A loyal servant of our Savior gladly assists honest seekers of the Truth in finding Him, and because Yâ-hwéh Yâhuwshúa` provides for us, the information we offer is free.

Properly translated references of "reincarnation" in Proverbs. recycling Αναστρέφω (Anastrepho) Strong’s # 390 “to turn hither and thither, to turn one’s self about, sojourn dwell in a place.”

Restored Ten Messages – a prediction about Yâhuwshúa`, which satan altered into commandments. THE TEN MESSAGES

According to inspired scriptures, there are three types of people in the world today. These are psychical, the spiritual and the earthly. CLASSIFYING THE COMPOSITION OF THE POPULATION: According to Codices According to several codices there are three types of population [one codex uses the word “phoenix” (winged-creature) instead of dirt-man] in this world (cosmos), until the end of the world [age/cosmos]. Their circumstances are compared to the three kinds of wing-creatures of pardeç "paradise"(as seen outside of time). The reason for the different descriptions is because during this age, dirt-men and winged-creatures are two of the 4 spiritual animals. Néphesh (“soul”) means insufflation and can be either from The One of Light, or from the one of the darkness. An insufflation from the Light is immortal but the one from the darkness is not. According to one treatise, the composition of the population of this world consists of (1) a body originating from darkness and fire ; (2) a néphesh (“soul”) brought forth through the defilement of the winds and the demons; (3) a particle of Mind (rescued by Spirit) and to whom our Savior granted a Light called ‘Trust’ (“pistis/faith”) and Thought produced by the ‘astonishment’ (EKSTASIS) of the Spirit (4). The Greek word EKSTASIS, from which comes "ecstasy", literally means being outside of one’s self, and is traditionally misinterpreted by scholars translating it as being crazy, astonished, out of sorts, “beside yourself”. But EKSTASIS describes The Mind’s literally transporting outside of one’s self, resulting in the Thought – the response given from the inquiry of the Mind to Yâ-hwéh Yâhuwshúa`, Who gives freely from the treasures of knowledge and Wisdom. So, 'Thought' is a result of the astonishment (EKSTASIS) of the Mind, to Yâ-hwéh Yâhuwshúa`. The combinations of these four constituents (1-4) defines three classes of population, even the hylic (material people), which we have termed “Type C”. These hylics (Type C), are ruled by the néphesh “soul” and belong to darkness – they have body and a néphesh from the darkness. But noetics (mental people), which we have termed “Type B”, who are ruled by the Mind and belong to Trust (“faith”) – they have a body, néphesh, and a mind; yet pneumatics (spiritual people), which we have termed “Type A”, are who are ruled by Thought and belong to Spirit – they have a body, soul, mind and thought). The sum of all of Type A and Type B compose the perfect finite number in the Mind of the Father, A-Z of one overcoming the demon (yisrâ’ë´l). Type A were procreated by the Son, and are known in restored LXX-decoded scriptures as yisrâ’ë´l above . Type B were procreated by Wisdom, currently being two daughters, one she procreated alone, B1, and the other she procreated with sâțâ´n, B2. The Son, Yâhuwshúa`, paid for adopting all of Type B, a broad category including all yisrâ’ë´l outside of Him: middle and underneath , per the descriptions of the vessels of yisrâ’ë´l found in LXX-decoded scriptures. But note that since Type C is not of the number of yisrâ’ë´l at all, they are not reckoned a vessel of yisrâ’ë´l and are hardly found mentioned in LXX-decoded scriptures, except the famous mention in Disclosure (Revelation) 20: 8 of the goats being rounded up to attack the last group of newly-existing ones, in coded speech as the ones not being the mountain (Ğowğ) and not from the mountain (Mâ-ğówğ). The Hebrew word yisrâ’ë´l means one overcoming the demon , those outside have not yet come to exist of yisrâ’ë´l. In terms of the Tree (cross) and the Fruit (Yâhuwshúa`), A regards the Fruit, B1 regards the Tree (cross), and B2 does not regard the Tree (cross). With regards to where one goes when one physically dies, Type A goes to the Light, but Type B goes to sh’ówl (the underworld). The chart below contains the information found in codices describing the characteristics found in each of these groups. It contains what we have noted after learning about these three types of characters in LXX decode d scriptures and the books of Baruch and our personal impressions with identifying their components accordingly with the codices and LXX decoded scriptures. We share the chart because inspired scriptures urge us to "know thy self,"; know how what composes each one, know from where each component came, and identify which kind we are, thus to know where we go after physical death. The codices mention three types of population, but we have identified that a group of deeply lost ones (from B2) are currently mixed in with the Type C to be discarded. To summarize and to further explain the relation of this categorization to the LXX decoded canonical description of the vessels of yisrâ’ë´l: Type A, who is called yisrâ’ë´l in LXX-decoded canonical scriptures, has the Spirit, Mind, and a Néphesh from the Light, and a Material Body and its néphesh from the darkness. Type A is the offspring of Yâhuwshúa` alone. The Envoy functions as the Mind and provides His Spirit (gifted to the ones , not on loan). His Standing makes the uniqueness for type A to be called Spiritual: pneumatics . The dirt-body (with its fiery one) temporary tabernacle carries His néphesh (f.) inside. Type A loves the Most High, their Father. At the Sixth Seal, when everything returns from where it came, Type A drops one component in their composition made by sâțâ´n, the fiery one, which is the flesh’s néphesh (f.) . Type B, who is middle yisrâ’ë´l and yisrâ’ë´l underneath , has a Mind, Néphesh, and Material Body. They are conscious of there being something higher than them, which makes Type B called Mental ones: noetics. Type B is two daughters of Wisdom, so it has two subgroups, B1 and B2. Type B1 is the Middle "Day" offspring of Sophia alone; these love their Mother and do have regard for the tree/cross. Type B2 is the offspring of Sophia and sâțâ´n, so codices say they have a choice of which of these two to prefer and take after, although neither regards the tree/cross. In LXX-decoded canonical scriptures, Middle "Night" yisrâ’ë´l are B2s are not being the darkness, but the sâțâ´nist widow yisrâ’ë´l underneath are B2s currently loving their father sâțâ´n, and striving to emulate their father sâțâ´n by doing away with their B2 Mind (conscience) as much as possible. Type C is not, nor will ever be, any of the finite perfect numbers of yisrâ’ë´l, but they are mentioned in codices and described when pertinent in restored canonical scriptures. The Type C group is merely composed of Material body and Néphesh. They have no conscience of anything but material so they are called Material: hylic. Type C goats are expendable stressors, according to codices, designed for destruction, and also noted in MattithYâ´huw 25:32-33. Type C are the goats, and since the adversary has no regard for the finite perfect number, Type C outnumbers the finite perfect number, meaning it composes over half the earth's population. Moreover, Type C rulers populate the top echelons of the pyramid of the order of this cosmos, which is upside down to make sâțâ´n, the lowest of all, literally the capstone oppressing everyone below him. The terms “above, middle, and underneath” refer to positions in the cosmos of Light, not this one of the darkness. Currently, those ruling authorities of this world are mixed with the B2 sâțâ´nist widow Underneath because they are competing for the adversary's favor. They are those “not being the mountain nor from the mountain” who will be led by the least favored Middle-night B2 ones, who will have been misled by B2 underneath by their “false prophets” when their Great Anger is released after one thousand years of recycling, and these will lead these Type C goats to surround those newly-existing widow B2 underneath, who by then will have come to reject their current father and accept Yâ-hwéh Yâhuwshúa`, and the Middle-night B2 ones will burn these ones with the fire of yisrâ’ë´l. : “Him against the material universe (All the ones entering into the cosmos (material universe), resembling a drop originating from the Light, are sent out/forth among My yisrâ’ë´ l of Sabaoth, “of the hosts” (a demon) in order that the same ones of the Son may be guarded/protected within Him (the Same One)”

You have read how the eleven apostles were chosen in the Bible. Did you ever wonder how Judas was called? JUDAS NOT ONE OF THE TWELVE Common Christian teachings portray Judas as " having been called to be one of the twelve disciples, who somehow changed his mind from being a good pupil and betrayed our Savior. It is as if He made a mistake calling him, or did not know what was in him, to think that Judas was ever for Him. " These gravely mistaken ideas greatly mislead Christians, and this page will disprove each of these myths. Was Judas One of the Twelve Disciples? In our studies, we need to use accurate terms to communicate concepts better. We will explain those here because the adversary has deceived everyone using inaccurate terms, neologisms, and false definitions to thoroughly confuse people. Therefore, in our diction, we call Judas by the original name he went by, Yehuwdâ´h. How did Yehuwdâ´h evolve to Judas? First, the letter J in the name "Judas" is how the capital letter "I" was written to distinguish it from the small letter L, beginning in the 14th century, and it adopted a different sound by the French in the 16th century. Why did the translators use an "I" to transliterate the Y in Yehuwdâ´h? Because in Old English, the letter "J" and the letter "Y" shared their enunciation rules as in "yesterday" or "yellow," just like the Hebrew letter y (yud). After 1611 KJV Bible publishing, modern English accepted the shape and sound of the letter "J" as "jay" and no longer the "yuh" "Y" sound because it adopted a different sound by the French in the 16th century. The "I" got its shape letter in the 15th century as a contribution of the Spanish language, and it was only about 1600's when the letter "J" started appearing in print. This fact leads to the question, how can Yehuwdâ´h's name be "Judas" if the letter "J" did not exist before the 14th century? The same question goes for "Jesus, " an untrue rendition of Yâhuwshúa` 's name. Following the procedural rules to further discredit the use of the J in English versions of Hebrew names, some allege that there does not exist a Hebrew letter of the 22 with the same sound as the new letter "J." But this is not so; the ancient Hebrew's undageshed gimel (ğ) has the sound. However, it is not currently given a different sound in the "modern" Hebrew of the jews. But this letter, g (gimel), is not one ever thought of in the rendering of "Jesus" nor "Judas." Why are we only dealing with Hebrew , not Latin or Greek ? Because no matter how many languages scriptures were translated into, this happened in Judea, and the populace there, although overrun by foreigners speaking various languages, had not changed the language being spoken there from being Hebrew. To know from the "Bible" what language our Savior spoke, we look to the book of Deeds "Acts," one mention of what language Yâhuwshúa` spoke. When He stopped Shâ’úwl (Paulus) on the road to Damascus – it says He was speaking in the Hebrew language "Shâ’úwl, why do you persecute Me?" A myth is being spread among those trying to deny His name is in Hebrew, alleging that everyone spoke Greek. But a person's name does not change according to the native language of the caller. Would it be surprising to hear that Christopher Columbus was actually Cristoforo Colombo? Do you think he would have responded to "Christopher"? A name is a sound that invokes someone, and if altered, it does not. Although we need to know the proper name of Yâhuwshúa`, in this case, the reasons for knowing the name of "Judas Iscariot" is really Yehuwdâ´h, are other reasons. There is a lot of confusion generated around this name, and meticulous research is challenging since disinformation is abundant everywhere. The reason is that the name Yehuwdâ´h ("Judas") is also used by Jews for their religion ("Judaism"), race (Yehuwdath), and physical land (Judea) –which they define as keeping their strict genealogical standards. Yet Yehuwdâ´h, if one tries to analyze it linguistically, it is not an original Hebrew word. The actual transliteration is Y_huwdah (shwa = silence _), as though a name-censor is censoring its vowel. And that is because the inventor of this name Yehuwdâ´h is satan, who within the serpent, said it to the dirt-man as the name which would open his eyes, but it closed his spiritual eyes and caused the fall of mankind. What Could the Adversary be Censoring Out Within Y_huwdah? The actual, accurate Hebrew term is Yâ huwdâ´h, which means, "The Profession of Yâ-hwéh." Yâ´huw is the short form of the name Yâ-hwéh in Hebrew. Professing His name is forbidden by Jewish satanic traditions censoring His name, especially His dual names Yâ-hwéh Yâhuwshúa`. Therefore, it should not be surprising that the adversary would censor the Yâ´huw in Yâhuwdâ´h, with a Y_huwdah. Although this was originally the name of one of the 12 tribes from the 12 sons of Ya'aqóv, the meaning of the spiritual tribe matters, which is, that ones He calls, are being the profession of Yâ-hwéh! This is thus called the authentic tribe, according to the Glad Tidings of Phílippos. This "tribe" is not determined by race nor genealogy; it is spiritually defined. Therefore, there is an enormous difference between Yehuwdâ´h and Yâhuwdâ´h. The satanic establishment has sanitized everything about Yâhuwdâ´h. The amount of censoring was so severe that wherever Yâhuwdâ´h was mentioned, the opposing term "Yehuwdâ´h" and its current versions have replaced it. This has caused mass confusion, caused by misapplying the satanic term to identify the spiritual tribe and misapplying the satanic term and their definitions to our Savior's spiritual kin and followers. The written spelling difference we highlight here would not be written until the 17th century when vowel pointing was introduced into Hebrew, and only curious scholars still knew of the original term. The vast difference between the faiths and beliefs of Yâhuwdâ´h versus Yehuwdâ´h are diametrically opposed: Yâhuwdâ´h worshipping Yâ-hwéh Yâhuwshúa` the Most High, and Yehuwdâ´h by their own admission worshipping the adversary, being identified as an assembly (synagogue) of satan, according to our Savior. Yet both continued to coexist geographically not in shâlówm (only the satanists being violent) until the dispersion, first of Christian Yâhuwdâ´h, and later the Romans dispersed the satanist Yehuwdâ´h by war. Now consider, since Yehuwdâ´h is satan's profession of himself as the counterfeit Savior: Yehuwdâ´h is the name of "Judas." Yehuwdâ´h is the name of a racial tribalist religion worshipping satan since all these hate the Profession of Yâ-hwéh, Yâhuwshúa`, is it unreasonable to describe this racial tribalist religion as the followers of "Judas," Yehuwdâ´h? This suggests that Yehuwdâ´h is the same adversary incarnated, solidly documented in various inspired scriptures. But the fact is hidden by the satanic establishment, which is frequently too embarrassed about who they worship to admit it openly. Thus, they work and pay their laborers to mold public opinion against thinking that. The resulting common Christian teachings portray Yehuwdâ´h as " having been called to be one of the twelve disciples, who somehow changed his mind from being a good pupil and betrayed our Savior. As if our Savior made a mistake calling him, or did not know what was in him, to think that Yehuwdâ´h was ever for Him ". A subtle difference is found in their mistranslating paradidomi , the term scribes translated as " betray ." Paradidomi means literally to give over, as we say, "turn over," what an enemy infiltrator does, to "hand over" someone to the satanic authorities of this world. " Betraya l" does not mean the same thing. " Betrayal " implies a change of heart from formerly being an ally to becoming an enemy. Yehuwdâ´h, the personification of the adversary, never was an ally, and he even knew and said that Yâhuwshúa` knew everything he conspired. Another mistranslation they made is prodótes , "one giving forwards (into another's hands)" from Luke 6: 16, as " the traitor ," because a traitor also implies the existence of a time when Yehuwdâ´h, the adversary, was once good by nature. Decoded scriptures and codices agree that the adversary was evil from his beginning, never having been in the Light. The myths about him having ever fallen or been a "heavenly angel" result from satanic scribes' scripture alteration. Most significant mistaken idea: was Yehuwdâ´h called? What is The Calling? "The Call" is a command performed ONLY by Yâhuwshúa` to awaken and address a prototypal sleeper – being any person who may awaken to Knowledge and Salvation. The Call also refers to Yâhuwshúa`, Who is The Word of The Way ["logos"], being the Garment of the Savior; said to be "The Voice (Call) of the immeasurable thought." – Paraphrase of Shem , and "The Mindless person hears 'the call' but is ignorant of the Place to which he or she has been called." Authoritative Discourse . The called ones (or calling) occupy the place of those who rejoice at the Bridal Chamber, who are happy on account of the union of the Bridegroom and the Bride. The Place [Son] which the calling [called ones] will have is the aeon [eternal One (Twin)] of the images [copies], where the Logos [Word of the Way] has not yet joined with the Pleroma [Fulness] of one overcoming the demon (Yisrâ’ë´l) . " The Tripartite Tractate At the time when Yâhuwshúa` told each one, He called, "Come follow me," only those He called could answer Him, thereby leaving material things behind to follow Him. In your "Bibles," it is recorded that Yâhuwshúa` only called eleven this way to be His pupils, "disciples." A thorough check of your "Bibles" or any other inspired scriptures will show that Yehuwdâ´h ("Judas") was never called to be one of the twelve. Furthermore, the eleven called by Yâhuwshúa` answered by following Him . The Books of the Savior, known as "Pistis Sophia," explains that these eleven are like copies of the eternal, existing ones in the dimension of Light. Yâhuwshúa` did not call Yehuwdâ´h because this one is not an existing one and will never come to exist, meaning to become actually having become 'one overcoming the demon' (Yisrâ’ë´l). Just because only eleven were called at that time does not mean the walk-in intruder Yehuwdâ´h was the twelfth. The eleven pupils called by Yâhuwshúa` are twins to the eleven high priest positions in the eternal realms of Light. When each of these eleven (female néphesh) is paired with their corresponding (male) envoy twin, as we read in the Bridal Chamber explanation, these eleven pairs comprise the twenty-two elders in the dimension of the Light who sit on their thrones attending to Yâhuwshúa`. But we see twenty-four written in Disclosure (Revelation). Why? Intentionally, Yâhuwshúa` left out the calling of the last pupil, the twelfth one. The twelfth's male twin envoy (number twenty-three) made the initial Call (in Wisdom, Sophia) for the Savior to come down and rescue Her, and that twelfth one's personhood is Miryâ'm of Miğdâlâ´h, the twenty-fourth and the lost sheep. There are many reasons why Yâhuwshúa` permitted it to be this way. And this confused the other eleven pupils who had not understood this information until His resurrection when Yâhuwshúa` revealed it to them after the mistake of selecting a twelfth themselves – by lottery, as documented in Deeds (Acts). They were mistaken to not understand that the call is only done by Yâhuwshúa`. At the end of the Glad Tidings of Tâ’ówm, one of the objections voiced by the eleven against Miryâ'm was her being in a female physical body. There, and in the Books of the Savior, "Pistis Sophia," it is written that Yâhuwshúa` would 'turn Miryâ'm into a male.' How is this possible? Yâhuwshúa` will pair her néphesh (which are all female) with her male envoy Twin (GT of Tâ’ówm scripture), making Miryâ'm of Miğdâlâ´h a spiritually male pupil of the Sovereign like His other pupils-turned-disciples. This preference for spiritual gender also explains why the unpaired are called "sisters," even if physically male. It is interesting to note the spiritual symbolism in that Miryâ'm came from Miğdâlâ´h, a fishing village on the Sea of Galilee, close to where Yâhuwshúa` was raised. This explains the twelfth missing pupil (disciple). Its explanation is found nearly entirely outside the small collection of scriptures selected by the satanists to be included, contributes to the confusion and the deception to think of Yehuwdâ´h having been that one. But even those scriptures initially did say Yehuwdâ´h never was called. Still, the evidence was hidden, omitted by the scribal shorthand coding of all canonical scriptures, which changed the intended meaning to satanic meanings. The resulting abbreviated altered version made Yehuwdâ´h sometimes sound like one of the twelve, especially when loosely translated into English by satanist authorities. But the facts about Yehuwdâ´h, which are easily found in codices and decoded canonical scriptures, both of which are declared off-limits to Christians by their foolish shepherds, are that he was the incarnation of the adversary, who sought to find Him and kill Him. In the "Gospel of Judas," Yâhuwshúa called him the 13th demon and said Yehuwdâ´h's star misled him, as this one was paired with the adversary. Yâhuwshúa` is He Who is without regard for the demon light-carrier (the adversary), and throughout all scriptures, especially the "Gospel of Judas," it is clearly seen that Yâhuwshúa` treated Yehuwdâ´h with no regard for him. Yâhuwshúa` would simply walk away when Yehuwdâ´h asked questions about the future 'unshakeable generation' that would endanger us and help him, the adversary, locate us. The Satanist Establishment Spin-doctors Yehuwdâ´h Misleading misrendered scriptures and banned books helped the satanist establishment spin-doctor Yehuwdâ´h . Thanks to Yahuwshua.org, we include here decoded strictly literally translated canonical scriptures to compare with the misleading coded and liberally translated establishment ones. Note, the blue font denotes text the coding omitted, and other differences were altered by translators to smoothen it out for the KJV. Compare them, you will find the KJV utterly antithetical to the original decoded form (NOTE to the reader, please review FPS latest translation): KJV vs. Decoded : MattithYâ´huw 10: 4-5 KJV – Simon the Canaanite, and Judas Iscariot, who also betrayed him. These twelve Jesus sent forth, and commanded them, saying, Decoded – Shim`ówn the zealot of Yisrâ’ë´l , yet Yehuwthâ´h "a man of His city" (' Iysh-Qiryáthow) , [is] he, who [is] without regard for Yisrâ’ë´l , and the one (m.) giving over the same One [being] the Son [being] these ones, with the one (m./ n. ) not the twelve he sent forth, who [is] without regard for Yâhuwshúa`, the One (m.) transmitting the message to the same ones (m.) pertaining to the Son , the One (m.) dictating: KJV vs. Decoded: Yâhuwchânâ´n's Glad Tidings 6: 67-71 KJV – Then said Jesus unto the twelve, Will ye also go away? Then Simon Peter answered him, Lord, to whom shall we go? thou hast the words of eternal life. And we believe and are sure that thou art that Christ, the Son of the living God. Jesus answered them, Have not I chosen you twelve , and one of you is a devil ? He spake of Judas Iscariot the son of Simon: for he it was that should betray him, being one of the twelve. Decoded– Therefore, concerning it, he dictated of the [ ~counterfeit ] "Yâ-hwéh", he [ ~Yehuwthâ´h ] who [is] wit hout regard for Yâhuwshúa`, [being] the one (m.) not the twelve: " Do ye of the father of the sovereign (' avadówn ) not of Yisrâ’ë´l, also wish to withdraw? " Therefore, responded of Yâ-hwéh against the same one (m.) against the Son , Shim`ówn Këph: "Oh Yâ-hwéh Yâhuwshúa` , of all Yisrâ’ë´l , towards whom (m.) shall we go away? The sayings of the Life of the eternal ones You hold of Yisrâ’ë´l, and we, we have believed Yours of Yisrâ’ë´l , and we have acknowledged this One , that [is] You : You cause to exist (ta-hyéh) he who [is] without regard for the Anointed, who [is] without regard for the Son with regard for [being] the one s (m.) not of the mighty one of' aharón (light-carrier/lucifer), not [being] the one s (m.) of the One (m.) living!" Who responded to the same ones (m.), pertaining to the son | who [is] without regard for Yâhuwshúa`|: " Of you (sing.) , one which [is] not I – [ being ] ye with the one (m./ n .) , not the twelve I picked out of Yisrâ’ë´l – also originating from I shall cause to exist (' a-hyéh) [1] of Yisrâ’ë´l [ are ] of ye: among My Yisrâ’ë´l a slanderer [ ~diábolous ] he is." Moreover, dictating of Yâ-hwéh: not of The One (n./m .) [ is ] Yehuwthâ´h [2] Bën-Shim`ówn [ ~the leper, a Pharushíy ], " a man of His city " ( ' Iysh- Qiryáthow )[3] , for the reason that, of Yâ-hwéh, this One Sheep he was intending to give over [is ] the same One (m.) [being] the Son among My Yisrâ’ë´l , the One causing to exist (ta-hyéh ) from "I shall cause to exist (' a-hyéh) [4] of Yisrâ’ë´l ", of the ones (m.) not [of] the adversary (sâţâ´n): the twelve of Yisrâ’ë´l. Comparing the above, it is clear that the scribal coding and the liberal translating portray Yehuwdâ´h falsely as having been called or chosen as one of the twelve. This has also been the case in all other such passages. And this, compounded to the scantiness of the scripture canon collection, being reduced to 66 books by satanist "church fathers," excluded books with more dirt on Yehuwdâ´h, serving to inform those confined to these books much less. See the Narrative of Yâhuwçë´ph of Aramathea: … And they summoned Yehuwthâ´h "a man of His city" (' Iysh-Qiryáthow) , and spoke to him, for he was son of the brother [~Shim`ówn the leper, a Pharushíy ] of Qayë´phâ' the priest. He was not a pupil before the face of Yâhuwshúa`; but all the multitude of the Yehuwthím craftily supported him, that he might follow Yâhuwshúa`, not that he might be obedient to the works of the Power done by Him, nor that he might profess Him, but that he might give Him over to them, wishing to catch up some lying word of Him, giving him gifts for such 'brave', 'honest' conduct to the amount of a half a weight (shekel) (5.7g), of gold each day. And he did this for two years [ ~146.8 oz total ] with Yâhuwshúa`, as says one of His pupils called Yâhuwchânâ´n. …And Yehuwthâ´h, going into the "sanctuary" at the dawn of the fifth day (1/8) [MattithYâ´huw 26: 14 ], says to all the people: "What are ye willing to give to me, so I will give up to you the overthrower of the Law, and the plunderer of the predicators?" The Yehuwthím say to him: "If you will give Him up to us, we will give you thirty pieces of gold ." [ZkharYâ´hu 11: 12 ] And the people did not know that Yehuwthâ´h was speaking about Yâhuwshúa`, for many of them professed that He was the Son of the Power. And Yehuwthâ´h received the thirty pieces of gold. And the scripture which Cyril of Jerusalem received, which was cursed by the paid laborers to label as "PseudoCyril," its translation to English says: "Judas, then, listened to his wicked wife. He went to the chief priests and said to them: 'What are you willing to pay me that I deliver him to you? 83 For I know that you are seeking to kill him. You have not been able to do anything against him, but if you want, I am the man who will deliver him to you.' And they made an arrangement with him for 30 ̶s̶i̶l̶v̶e̶r̶ [gold] pieces." Reliably translated books describe the reward offered by the Yehuwdím (Jews) as being thirty pieces of gold , not silver. Throughout the adversary’s history, he loves material gold, the "seed of the demon of fire" in the Hindu religion. Why did the Yehuwdím (Jews) change the writing to silver whenever they could in scriptures? This would hide who Yehuwdâ´h was and help mitigate the image of extreme greed and evil, which characterizes the spiritual leader of the Yehuwdím (Jews). Modern Day Judas-Defenders Yâhuwshúa` calls Yehuwdâ´h the 13th demon, and the Yehuwdím (Jews) at National Geographic render it as "the 13th spirit" These followers of Yehuwdâ´h, the Yehuwdím (Jews), are strategically controlling the media sources of this world and the roles of the most accepted paid-worker scholars translating scriptures. This includes the National Geographic Society, who obtained the “Gospel of Judas" exclusively and fully endeavored to mitigate and remake Judas's image, brazenly mis translating several damning passages within it forbidding the release of the contents of this manuscript to prevent objective translations from being made. When one non-Jewish scholar called their attention to one such flagrant alteration, they issued a private apology, but their translation was not corrected. The “Gospel of Judas” contained many facts about Yehuwdâ´h, which these revisionists in the National Geographic Society deliberately altered to remake his image. Several scholars who objected to the National Geographic’s translation of the “Gospel of Judas” submitted their corrections of the mis translations which we share here: Scholars’ Corrections: Yehuwdâ´h “Judas” is a 13th demon.” Yehuwdâ´h “Judas” will lament and mourn his fate.” Yehuwdâ´h 's “Judas” seed controls the archons instead of being controlled by them.” Yehuwdâ´h “Judas” is separated from the holy (pure unshakeable) generation.” Yehuwdâ´h “Judas” will not ascend to the pure (pure unshakeable generation).” Yehuwdâ´h “Judas” cannot enter the heavenly house he has seen in his vision (his envoy “star” deceived him).” Yehuwdâ´h “Judas” does the worst thing he can do by sacrificing Yâhuwshúa`.” National Geographic Rendition: Yehuwdâ´h “Judas is the perfect enlightened gnostic.” Yehuwdâ´h “Judas ascends to the holy generation.” Yâhuwshúa` “Jesus wants Judas to betray Him. Yâhuwshúa` “Jesus wants to escape the material world.” Yehuwdâ´h “Judas performs a righteous act, serving “Jesus” by “betraying” Him.” Yehuwdâ´h “Judas will be able to enter the divine real as symbolized by His vision of the great house.” As the “thirteenth,” Judas surpasses the twelve disciples, and is lucky and blessed by this number.” Yehuwdâ´h "A Stranger to the Apostleship" The book of Cyril of Jerusalem, cursed by the paid-laborers as “PseudoCyril”, its translation to English (which uses traditional versions of names) says: “This is the calling of Jesus Christ with which he has called (the apostles). In peace. Amen. The calling, then, of the apostles was in this way by God. Simon Peter, John, Andrew and James were fishers, fish catchers according to the craft of this world. The father of Philip was a charioteer in the races. Thomas, however, was a tender of the waterwheel. Bartholomew was a gardener, a grower and seller of greens. Thaddeus was a stonecutter. Matthew was a tax collector. Simon Cananites was an inviter to the wedding. James the son of Alpheus was a tender of the waterwheel. Judas Iscariot has been estranged from the apostleship .’ What was the Greek term where you see “estranged ”? It is: Strong’s #3927: parepidemos – “one who comes from a foreign country into a city or land to reside there by the side of the natives, an alien alongside, a resident foreigner”. But the paid-laborer scholar Roelof van den Broek, who translated this book into English documented in his footnote that he translated this word as “estranged” because he did not believe the original word to be accurate, and that it should have been ἀπαλλοτριόομαι – “to be alienated; to be alienated from”, because the original did not agree with his mistaken belief that Yehuwdâ´h was called by Yâhuwshúa`. This is another example of the satanic conspiracy to repair the reputation of Yehuwdâ´h. Examine Strong's #245, ἀλλότριος which is defined as "another's, i.e., not one's own; by extension foreign, not akin, hostile" and another lexicon saying "belonging to another, foreign, strange, not of one's own family, alien, an enemy." But parepidemos does agree with a phrase frequently found in decoded scriptures, describing Yehuwdâ´h: "the son among My Yisrâ’ë´l," which means an alien alongside. But a "son"? How do we explain the adversary being an alien "son"? This goes perfectly with the record that yaldabosheth/yaldabaoth, the spawn of shame misconceived by Wisdom without the Father's consent, is also known as the adversary (satan). Yehuwdâ´h appears to be a standard omission associated with "shall be" in scribal coding in the LXX. It is found everywhere in decoded LXX. The determination of which of the two terms, Yehuwdâ´h/Yâhuwdâ´h it speaks of is made by the context (e.g., Yshá`Yâhuw 28: 18-19). It is Yehuwdâ´h when it refers to the adversary. Yehuwdâ´h is described as the son, not One's own(e.g., Yshá`Yâhuw 28: 21) since the adversary was not a son of our Father at all. This term is ἀλλότριος. What is the Meaning of "Iscariot"? Sometimes knowing the names of persons from antiquity can give further information. People of the lower classes did not have last names, and so to differentiate people with the same first name, descriptive designations were often added. Yehuwdâ´h, the son of Shim`ówn the leper/Pharushíy, had a second term applied to him, "Iscariot," seen transliterated into Greek as 'Iskariótes.' This is apparently transliterated and grecianized from Hebrew, Iysh-Qiryáthow, which means "the husband/man of His city." In some places where the LXX pre-advent scriptures reference Yehuwdâ´h, it denies him being of the City. The “City” refers to the City of the Most High as a spiritual organization composed exclusively of His own, so it excludes the adversary. This is seen in the "Glad Tidings of Yehuwdâ´h," where Yâhuwshúa` told him he would never enter His great house. One nineteenth-century scholar suggested that Iscariot came from a Hebrew word meaning "to stop up" (skr) and that it referred to the fact that he died by strangling (his throat was "stopped up"). Another scholar suggested that the term came from the Semitic words' isqa' re'ut – which might mean something like "one who makes money out of friendship." Some scholars thought that the term showed he came from the region known as Issachar (an Issachariot). Iscariot sounds like the Latin word for dagger, sica, and is possibly related to Jewish dagger-assassins known as the Sicarii. Does Yâhuwshúa` Make Mistakes? So, did Yâhuwshúa` make a mistake letting Yehuwdâ´h follow Him around? Did Yâhuwshúa` not know what would happen? Yes , Christians know He did because the regular canon clarifies that our Savior was quite well-aware of what Yehuwdâ´h would do and who he was. But consider this: The adversary made a mistake thinking that he should follow Him around to have His dirt-body killed, thinking it would put Him under his power and that he could confine Him in the underworld. Because he was so deceived, he made the blunder to apply death to One Who was untouchable and invisible to the forces of darkness. So, the adversary is one who did not know what would happen! The adversary lost the information war at that point because our Savior Yâ-hwéh Yâhuwshúa` had planned His Work before the cosmos was founded and went into the very middle, in the center of everything, and did everything in full view of everyone, to get every single One of the lights out of this darkness. The Work Yâhuwshúa` did on the cross is well-known to the world, and the adversary's erasing that from history is a lost cause for him. " The one (m.) having been blessed [is] he who [is] without regard for the one (m.) [ ~future impostor: Yehuwth â´h/sâţâ´n ] coming among the ones (m.) within one overcoming the demon (Yisrâ’ë´l) , against the name (n.) of Yâ-hwéh- Yâhuwshúa` of one overcoming the demon (Yisrâ’ë´l) ! " – MattithYâ´huw 23: 39, Luwqá’ 13: 35 Keep this in mind about Yehuwdâ´h, who is the incarnation of satan, who was neither called nor chosen and has recycled many times and in recent times as the antichrist. To read more about that, click here . So do not be fooled by the adversary's attempts to revise history through his paid laborers to make Yehuwdâ´h a 'misunderstood victim of antisemitism supposedly.' Sources: Free Firstfruists' Purer Scriptures (FPS) available for download here The thirteenth apostle : what the G ospel of Judas really says By De Conick, April D Cyril of Jerusalem On the Life and the Passion of Christ https://brill.com/view/title/22285?language=en Why the jews reject Yâhuwshúa`-http://revelationoutpost.com/uploads/3/4/1/7/34178686/the_harold_wallace_rosenthal_interview_-_1976.pdf [now defunct] The Narrative of Joseph of Arimathea -https://www.newadvent.org/fathers/0813.htm An example page of how Jewish scholars are accustomed to code scriptures to conceal their true meaning: The link to the source we once had is now censored, but we include it below for reference: http://www.realbiblecodes.com/torah_codes/begin_torahcodes/begin-torahcodes-3.php [no longer secure] back to top Run!...run from paid laborers of satan who require one to "help" support their mission either with monetary donations, offerings, or the purchase of scripture translations, books, or full access to their material content so that one's knowledge could increase. A loyal servant of our Savior gladly assists honest seekers of the Truth, and because Yâ-hwéh Yâhuwshúa` , through the Mother provides the information is free.

'Elohiym is a specific name of a demon progeny emanation of sâtâ´n (adversary). 'EL OHIYM IS NOT MY YÂ-HWÉH Satanic Names Substitutes Misidentify Who We Worship Elohim Wrongly Inserted Into in The Torah (Law) XXX Elohim (Strong's #430) , the plural form of the singular noun elo'ah (Strong's #433 ) , a masculine noun xxxx [ Disclaimer : In this document in which we expose the foreign demons’ terms ’el, ’eloah , and ’elohiym , we quote others using the term “god” although we do not use this term ourselves for the Most High Yâ-hwéh, because “ god ” is also a term literally meaning “demon” in Hebrew.] Historical Evidence The first one to discuss of the distinction between Yâ-hwéh, usually “translated” the LORD , and elohim , traditionally “translated” as god , was their Rabbi Judah “Yehuda” Halevi, 12th Century A.D, in his book The Kuzari . At the beginning of the fourth part of his book, Judah exposes something unbelievable that precedes all modern academic scholarship researched-information on the subject-term ‘elohim.’ Yehuda tells us that the term ‘elohim’ is not original to their traditions as Yehuwdiym Jews rather that the term comes from the pagan world. Their “Rabbi” Yehuda Halevi, a revered philosophical teacher by Jews, points out that the pagan word ‘elohim’ is plural as it refers to forces or powers of nature; while the name Yâ-hwéh was unknown to them because of their tradition to not pronounce His names. So as a result, these followers of the Torah (Law) did not know how to pronounce the name Yâ-hwéh. The Jews Only Said the Name Yâ-hwéh Once a Year Scholars tend to agree that ‘Yâ-hwéh’ is a representation of how the ancient sons of Israel initially pronounced the Tetragrammaton (Four-letter word) , called “Barbelo” in codices. According to the Yoma and the Mishnah , the commentaries on it state that “one does not pronounce the ineffable name outside” – the limits of the material temple. But “on the Day of Atonement, ten times did the high priest pronounce His name”; [The Sacred Name – yahweh.org] this occurred while all the priests who gathered around in the material temple did loud chanting so that the public would not hear His name <> pronounced. Elohim: Adopted From the Pagan World The Kna`aníym polytheistic-pantheistic ‘religion’ which pre-dates Judaism, was borrowed from another belief system and had a history created to give it credibility. The New World Encyclopedia describes the belief system of “divine clan, headed by the supreme god El ; the gods collectively made up the elohim .” El — according to The New World Encyclopedia , was the chief deity, god of the sky, father of many lesser gods and ruler of the divine assembly, also worshiped by the apostatizing sons of Israel. In Ugarit, the gods were called 'ilhm (elohim), or the children of El. Through the centuries, the pantheon of Canaanite gods evolved, so that El and Asherah were more important in earlier times, while Baal and his consorts came to fore in later years. Many of the Kna`aníym deities found their way into the Greek and Roman pantheon. For example, the characteristics of both El and Ba`´al are visible in Zeus . The polytheists and name-substituters used the Greek ‘theos’ as well as the Ivríyth ’el interchangeably whenever they made references to the True Most-High Yâ-hwéh, just as they did to foreign gods as theoi and ’elohim regardless that the terms theos and ’el is a title they used and not a personal name for Yâ-hwéh. Theos: Occurs in the LXX with few exceptions as a translation for the Hebrew word ’elohim and His name Yâ-hwéh. However, morphologically-analyzed decoded LXX shows that every instance of theos was not applied to our Yâ-hwéh although post-advent “New Testament” Greek scriptures DO use theos applied to Yâ-hwéh, never the theoi plural form, confirming that ’elohiym was not found in the Hebrew post-advent original scriptures and this points to a post-advent time being when the term ’elohiym was inserted into Hebrew manuscripts. Theos – Greek translations of Hebrew scriptures correctly translated Hebrew ’Ël to Greek Theos (Strong’s #2304), as both are a generic term for a power/mighty one. Like ’Ël, when not clearly stated to be referring to our Yâ-hwéh, Theos also refers to demons. Yet, Theos is freely used usually as a component of religious Christian terms such as Theology, Theophany, Theocracy, Theosophy, Atheism, etc. A cursory look at the surrounding terms in Greek lexicons will show you that Strong’s #2303 theion is “brimstone”, sulfur, because it was considered “divine incense, because burning brimstone was regarding as having power to purify, and to ward off disease” (OLB Greek Lexicon). Reportedly, Sh’ówl stinks, of sulfur among its other smells, because brimstone is associated with demons. The book of Chanówkh (“Enoch”) also reports (interestingly in chapter 66: 6), this: 6 And when all this happened, from that burning molten mass of metal and from the agitation which troubled them in that place, there arose a strong smell of sulfur, which became mixed with the waters; and that valley where the Watchers, who had been guilty of seduction, burned underneath its soil. Therefore, theos is originally a term referring to these kinds of worshiped entities which are associated to sulfur, demons again. Whenever they made references to the True Most-High Yâ-hwéh, since these singular terms were routinely found in scriptures, the name-substituters used the Greek ‘theos’ as well as the Ivríyth ’el to substitute out His name they despised, regardless that the terms theos and ’el is merely one description they used and not a personal name for Yâ-hwéh. The pluralism of “Elohim” Then the polytheists, just as they pluralized foreign gods as theoi and ’elohim , the polytheist Jewish scribes replaced Yâ-hwéh’s name and most singular ’Ël references with plural ’elohim also. Although Yâ-hwéh is One (’echâth) , a Union, and therefore not plural. In fact, He inhabits those He causes to come to exist, to become within His Union. At the End, when the number of His emanations will be complete A-Z (Alpha through Omega), then He will again become One at the End to do away with darkness. The misunderstanding of this is likely what commenced those erring into polytheism, and it’s easy to see, particularly when the various emanations of Him get materially personified by the errant, and then Wisdom gets worshipped as “Sophia” etc. etc. The Septuagint (LXX) is a Greek translation of pre-advent “Old Testament” scriptures, which was written in the 3rd century BC Roman Date, far before the Masoretic text which was altered after Yâhuwshúa`’s coming. The 70 scribes who translated it hid large amounts of information from the heathen Greeks, hiding it in codes. Today, these codes have been decoded and analyzed, and, with regard to theos, it shows that every instance of theos in it was not applied to Yâ-hwéh, every instance of “Theos” occurring next to Yâ-hwéh (which it substitutes Kurios for), it says “One without regard for the THEOS of ’aharón (light-carrier/lucifer)”, προς {<3364> “not”} θεος {<2> “aaron”} Occasionally “theos” has been seen to be plural, ALSO having <2> for ’aharón (light-carrier/lucifer). The other way “theos” is seen in this decoded LXX is as “not a theos” referring to sâtâ´n, because he is not a true power/mighty one. But in the post-advent “New Testament”, Greek scriptures DO use theos applied to Yâ-hwéh, but never using the theoi plural form, confirming that ’elohiym was not found in the Hebrew scriptures available at that time, and this points to a post-advent time being when the term ’elohiym was inserted into Hebrew manuscripts such as the Masoretic text. Encyclopedias and Other Writings about Elohim Agnōstos Theos Ἄγνωστος Θεός” - was found inscribed on Greek altars dedicated "to the unknown god." The inscription had no mystical or theosophical meaning, but arose out of a concern for religious “cultic safety: no one wanted to incur the wrath of” a god, whose name was unknown, but who might exist vexed by the lack of honors. In their ignorance (agnosticism), the Greeks erected an altar to whatever god they might have inadvertently left out of their pantheon. In the book of Yehuwdâ´h The Gospel of Judas , they call a “Glad Tidings” we read how Yâhuwshúa` corrected the way our brothers, His pupils, praised Him. In one instance Yâhuwshúa` finds them gathered together and seated in reverence to give His Father thanksgiving. Then Yâhuwshúa` laughs at the demons who misguided them to pray in the manner that they did customarily. Had they had the foresight that Who was standing in their midst was Yâ-hwéh within Yâhuwshúa` as One, they would have instead turned their eyes toward Him to praise Him. “The disciples said to [him], “Master, why are you laughing at [our] prayer of thanksgiving? We have done what is right. ” He answered and said to them, “I am not laughing at you. You are not doing this because of your own will but because it is through this that your god [’el] will be praised.” The English translators of this book substituted “god” in the place of theo s and the Greek translators of this Hebrew book had translated ’ël as Greek theos . With this information, reconsider why our Father Yâ-hwéh Yâhuwshúa` taught His pupils, our brothers, a proper way to pray in MattithYâ´huw 6: 9-20, and that is because our brothers, the first on earth to follow Yâhuwshúa`, had been unwittingly worshiping elohiym , because they were heeding something else that was not Him. Since Yâhuwshúa` was not referring to Himself as the god [’ël] they had praised, the term ’ël there is about a demon. The 1966 edition of the Unger’s Bible Dictionary, Page 412, states that the word EL is a Kna`aníym “Canaanite” word meaning “God,” or “Devil.” The Interpreter’s Dictionary of the Bible, Volume 1, Page 817, under DEMONOLOGY, says: The word ELOHIM, (plural form of EL), means “demons” and or “gods", saying that they adopted this plural form, copying the Canaanites to "summarize all the various manifestations of this deity". It is sad to see that more recent reference-books have had such information removed, to revise history in a huge and quiet cover-up conspiracy to make these terms appear entirely acceptable for those researching them, simply because the truth about ’elohíym is that it ALWAYS refers to demons (and perhaps magistrates) and never Yâ-hwéh. Click here to see a screenshot reference in the book. According to the Raelian Movement Professor Katherine Bayer writes, the Elohim are a human-like alien race that created life through material scientific processes on Earth. The Elohim “created humanity as an equal, just as their [own] creators once created them as equals. They claim that through this process, intelligent life continues to develop throughout”. The Raelians claim that only they hold that the correct meaning of the word Elohim , as "those who come from the sky." They believe the more traditional translations of the word are in error. back to top Elohim in Inspired Scripture Codices In the codices we also read more damning condemnations against the term ‘elohim ’: From The End Times of Këph “The Apocalypse of Peter ” - “And the Savior said to me, "Be strong, for you are the one to whom these mysteries have been given, to know them through revelation, that He whom they crucified is the First-born, and a dirt-body [made by means] of demons to dwell in, and the stony vessel in which they dwell [is] of elohim [demons], of the cross, which is under the Law. But He who stands accompanying him is the Living Savior.” – In another codex, Justin’s Baruch, The Three Principle of the All are: “the Good One, Elohim, and Edem (the Earth). The first two are male; the third is female. The Good possesses the knowledge about the All. The word "Elohim" is called the father of what is [materially] created and father of the Jewish god-demiurge. Therefore, we should not capitalize elohiym as it is not a proper name. And again in the “Secret book of Yâhuwchânâ´n John”: “Yal dabaoth raped Eve. She bore two sons. Elohim was the name of the first. Yâ-hwéh was the name of the second. Elohim has a bear’s face. Yâ-hwéh has a cat’s face. One is righteous; One is not. Yâ-hwéh is righteous; Elohim is not.” Note: The Aramaic “Yaldabaoth” (Yaldabosheth in Hebrew) means Sp awn of Shame in English, another term for the adversary who was not acknowledged to be given a formal name at all. We see here satan made “Elohim”, which we have shown above is “not righteous” (correct), as it never should apply to our Yâ-hwéh. Scriptures are interpreted spiritually, not materially. With regards only to the term “righteous”, note it means “correct”. The name “Yâ-hwéh” is correct, but the name “Elohim” is not, because it, being plural, does not apply to our Yâ-hwéh Yâhuwshúa` Who is One, not plural. This passage means satan made a Yâ-hwéh underneath himself, which is not the Yâ-hwéh far over him, Who is Yâhuwshúa`. The adversary "satan" also made many other demons and named them with the same names as those in the highest heavens, and this is why the same scripture says true original ones have two names, as our Yâ-hwéh is Yâ-hwéh Yâhuwshúa`. The accuser also made elohim , which we have shown above is not righteous, as it never should apply to our Yâ-hwéh. "The demons’ (own) names, given by Yaldabaoth, are mighty names But the Powers’ names reflecting the glory above Will bring about the demons’ destruction and remove their Power. That is why each has two names." I have said, ye are gods, and all of you are children of 'elohiym We are not elohiym (demons), we are sons of Yâ-hwéh Yâhuwshúa` and will not violate Yâ-hwéh’s instructions written in our hearts of loving Him more than anything , to not worship the gods, which are elohiym. Our King and Savior revealed Himself to Moshéh as Yâ-hwéh Yâhuwshúa`, and never as Elohim, a fact obliterated out of the heavily altered Masoretic text, but as Yâ-hwéh said, we should not apply name substitutes to Yâ-hwéh, nor create images or anything which honors elohiym, the demons. After examining the widespread common use of the term 'gods' which means ‘demons’ in Greek, we can now see how English-speaking deceived Christians use this specific name of the foreign deity ’elohíym , into applying it to Yâ-hwéh Yâhuwshúa`. I do hope this article blesses you, the reader, to discover that the use of pagan titles did not originate from the first and original, writings. They were, in fact, only accepted by the people of Israel after coming into the material land which was occupied by Kna`aníym, and adopting their wrong terminology, because the Kna`aníym once spoke Ivríyth; however, their worship was of DEMONS. But the terms finding their way into the public-view scriptures themselves had to be after the ascension of Yâhuwshúa`, as the post-advent scriptures still show knowledge of the material omitted in codes by the LXX scribes. Considering how our Father Yâ-hwéh Yâhuwshúa` commands us to honor His names, publish His names, boastfully praise His names - 5th Book of Moshéh Deuteronom y 30: 17-19, only several hundred years later, satan worked his scribes, the ones working , so that our scriptures became polluted and degutted, substituting Yâ-hwéh’s name out with the pagan titles of plurist elohim, adonai, and satan-specific god , and lord . Though at the time, the use of these pagan terms was accepted and routinely used by the name-censoring copyists to replace Yâ-hwéh’s name to identify Him in their writings, they remain nonspecific at best, and at worst, specific for satan. Moreover, these pagan words cannot call on Yâ-hwéh Yâhuwshúa`, the name they forgot and did not prefer, because what they prefer are TITLES of satan and his demons, which they obeyed to alter the scriptures. It is by the intervention of the self-willed-one, the spawn of shame, and lesser god that scholars, who interpret the original Aramaic, Hebrew, and Greek Scriptures into English (and other languages) were led to conspire in the removal of His name Yâ-hwéh altogether, and to hide the name of Yâhuwshúa`, Who defeated him, completely; Their excuse? The one often given for this detestable censorship involves a misinterpretation of the Third Law of satan they made by altering our Yâ-hwéh’s Ten Messages , to say not “take His name in vain.” How then can we openly make praise offerings professing His name (Todah Yâ-hwéh) and how then can we boast about our Yâ-hwéh: (Hal’luw Yâ´hu)? Conclusion: This third law of satan (from the ten commandments) only promotes satan by having people remove specific references to the Most High Yâ-hwéh to forget Him and steal His praise. Therefore, every nonspecific name substitute serves satan unless tied to Yâ-hwéh Yâhuwshúa`’s name, and every name substitute specific for satan, like elohim , should never be used for Yâ-hwéh Yâhuwshúa.` The safest best option is to call Him by His dual names and if one needs to say He is our Power or Sovereign or any other description, such as Father, to keep it in English. Let each one take care, in one’s offering of one’s Testimony, to keep it purely about Yâ-hwéh Yâhuwshúa`, the One without regard for the ’ël or ’elohiym of ’aharon (lucifer/light-carrier), so eliminate elohim and all other deceit of satan. Do not trust a Word from the mouths of anyone who comes in the name of demons, 'elohiym' (El), or any other name-substitutes for Yâ-hwéh Yâhuwshúa` . back to top Bibliography & Source Links: Johnson, Sarah, Religions of the Ancient World, Belknap Press, Cambridge, 2004) Strong, James, Strong’s Exhaustive Concordance of the Bible , Nelson, Nashville, 1990) The Thirteenth Apostle - What the Gospel of Judas Really Says by April D. DeConick The Gospel of Judas Translated by Rodolphe Kasser, Marvin Meyer, and Gregor Wurst, in collaboration with François Gaudard A Dictionary of Christian Biography, Literature, Sects, and Doctrines , Volume 4 The Apocalypse of Baruch: Translated from the Syriac A Dictionary of Gnosticism Paperback – November 17, 2009, by Andrew Phillip Smith Cady, Susan, Marian Ronan, and Hal Taussig. Wisdom's Feast: Sophia in Study and Celebration. New York: Harper & Row, 1989. Camp, Claudia V. Wisdom and the Feminine in the Book of Proverbs . Decatur: Almond, 1985. Cixous, "The Laugh of the Medusa. " The Critical Tradition: Classic Texts and Contemporary Trends. Ed. David H. Richter. Boston: Bedford, 1998. 1453-1471. Irigaray, Luce. "This Sex Which is Not One." The Critical Tradition: Classic Texts and Contemporary Trends. Ed. David H. Richter. Boston: Bedford, 1998. 1466-1471. Johnson, Elizabeth A. "Wisdom Was Made Flesh and Pitched Her Tent Among Us." Reconstructing the Christ Symbol: Essays in Feminist Christology. Ed. Maryanne Stevens. New York: Paulist, 1993. 95-117. Mollenkott, Virginia Ramey. The Divine Feminine . New York: Crossroad, 1984. Newman, Barbara. Sister of Wisdom: St. Hildegard's Theology of the Feminin e. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1987. Whybray, R.N. Wisdom in Proverbs: The Concept of Wisdom in Proverbs 1-9. Naperville: Allenson, 1965. https://brill.com/view/book/9789004296008/B9789004296008-s011.xml http://www.ancient-hebrew.org/dictionary/500.html#430 http://gnosis.org/naghamm/nhl.html https://www.iep.utm.edu/gnostic/ https://www.thoughtco.com/raelian-movement-95694 https://www.encyclopedia.com/environment/encyclopedias-almanacs-transcripts-and-maps/agnostos-theos http://www.newworldencyclopedia.org/entry/Canaanite_Religion https://www.westernseminary.edu/transformedblog/2013/12/09/pronouncing-the-divine-name/ https://worldhistory.us/ancient-history/ancient-near-east/el-and-the-elohim.php http://www.ancient-hebrew.org/dictionary/500.html#433 "A son of Mine with regard for Perdition (’Avadówn) cares little for the education of Yâ-hwéh, but do not despond under the correction of His Son, oh Yisrâ’ë´l, because whom Yâ-hwéh loves, Yâ-hwéh educates, and Yâ-hwéh scourges everyone that has regard for the Son, whom He acknowledges as His own". - Proverbs מְ 3:11-12 מְשָׁלִ֥ים

"The Way of Yâ-hwéh (Dérekh Yâ-hwéh)", is the original faith all of scripture speaks of, from the OT onward throughout the NT. THE WAY OF YÂ-HWÉH YÂHUWSHÚA` “Come, follow Me” - The Way of Yâ-hwéh Yâhuwshúa` The Way of Yâ-hwéh Yâhuwshúa’ is mentioned several times in properly translated scriptures and inspired extra-canonical scriptures. Yet there is very little understanding about The Way among the Christian teachings, and this is because their pastors do not have the Spirit of Truth nor an Ear to discern meanings beyond what Yâ-hwéh Yâhuwshúa’s` literally said that “He is the Way, the Truth and the Life.” Although Yâ-hwéh Yâhuwshúa` is indeed The Way, the Truth and the Life, one needs to expand more on His saying to receive more understanding about what Yâhuwshúa` meant. Before anything else, to understand Him, one has to first obtain His spirit of Truth by way of acknowledging that He is Yâ-hwéh Who is our Savior, Who took on a dirt-body form, dwelt among us, then was crucified as the slaughter Offering Ransom for us, yet rose from the medically-dead state three days later; this is Yâhuwshúa`, Who is Yâ-hwéh. If you believe He actually did this and that His names are really Yâ-hwéh Yâhuwshúa` and worth switching away from the false names circulating, then we may proceed. Yâhuwshúa` said, “Come, Follow Me,” Would You Like To Know Where He Was Leading His Followers to go First? Yâhuwshúa` led His followers to the Cross. Indeed, everyone who desires to have a Life in Yâ-hwéh Yâhuwshúa` will eventually be a persecuted believer – 2nd Letter to Timótheos 3:12. And therefore, If you believe in following the Life, death, and resurrection of Yâhuwshúa` of the Anointed One, you’re walking The Way of Yâ-hwéh Yâhuwshúa’, overcoming the struggles with this world by means of Him with the goal to return to our Land, our Home (before our fall) and leave this material world (and its temp creator) behind. These with Him within are now wearing His Resurrection and are unafraid and unashamed to strip off their filthy dirt-garment and trample them under our feet because these are His little Ones, who will see the Son of the Living One and not be afraid. In the meantime, they wear His Resurrection as His promise to them until the Sixth Seal after when their inner-Man gets revealed; this is the Life in Yâ-hwéh Yâhuwshúa`. Preferring Him Over Everything and Everyone is the First Commandment In MattithYâ´huw 19:21 Yâhuwshúa` tells a worldly (rich) man to give away his wealthy material possessions and to follow Him, to be made perfect. But because choosing to follow Yâhuwshúa`, the Cross or the Narrow Path, is a difficult thing for one who is not yet favored of Him, one such person cannot do this even if he thought of himself to be a strong man. Preferring Him over everything and everyone is the First Commandment. The true followers of The Way of Yâ-hwéh Yâhuwshúa’DO this when these acknowledge Yâ-hwéh Yâhuwshúa` by His names and esteem Him as being our TRUE husband; therefore, they do not place any carnal husband or wife over Him, if those reject Him, these are free to leave them. The true followers of the Way of Yâ-hwéh Yâhuwshúa’ also leave (biological) material fathers, mothers, brothers, children and anyone else who hates Him or opposes our preferring Him (our walk) to follow our Savior Yâhuwshúa`. The true followers of the Way of Yâ-hwéh Yâhuwshúa’ are openly witnesses for Yâ-hwéh Yâhuwshúa,` and only these can witness for Him because these are His living temple and are all spokesmen for Him; and this kind of walk, is the Way of Yâ-hwéh Yâhuwshúa’. Believers of The Way of Yâ-hwéh Yâhuwshúa` Believers of The Way of Yâ-hwéh Yâhuwshúa’ first sought forgiveness from Yâ-hwéh Yâhuwshúa` for following after His accuser (satan/ the ways of this world or wide path), to now walk the Narrow Path; this is why, before Yâhuwshúa` came, Yâhuwchânâ´n the Immerser came to till the Land to prepare it for the Seed of Life, meaning to immerse them in repentance (change of mind) before Yâ-hwéh, wherein they regretted their sins and changed their behavior and closed their ear to further suggestions to continue such behavior. But forgiveness from their sins came when they prayed to our Father by the name of Yâhuwshúa` and being immersed in His name (having His name on your mind always) functions as a repellent for evil spirits; this Word is the Truth (of Yâ-hwéh) and those who prefer the Word of the Way Yâ-hwéh Yâhuwshúa` follow Him wherever He goes. Are You One of His Chosen Ones? The many are called but few are chosen – by our Father – to believe in Yâ-hwéh Yâhuwshúa` by means of His true names and this is to worship Him in Truth. No Lie is useful to pertain to Him because all lies come from the adversary, the father of the Lie. The ones chosen to be unshakable, this life-time around, because we have had prior lives (nativities), we have died every day (a thousand year day) because we had forgotten His name, but now you have heard it, His true name, as it truly sounds from Him, so are you chosen to believe in Yâ-hwéh Yâhuwshúa` by name unshakeably? This webspace is where some of His spiritually winged-creatures have set up a table to feed newcomers the true Bread from heaven, Yâhuwshúa’s name; will you say "mân" ("manna" = what is it?) and leave Him because you desire different food? Understand that He is pure and won't accept a corrupt perversion of His name, so to be reckoned righteous in His sight you must switch to His true name. Then your true spiritual eyes, His vision-Source, will be opened and you will be able to see what is right and what is wrong, and walk with Him on His Way unshakeably, if you are chosen - "elect" - so don't delay any more if you are chosen! And make up your mind quickly because time is short, and you have to grow and get ready for His return! Are you chosen? A to be continued mission in this material chaos... For more information about The Way of Yâ-hwéh Yâhuwshúa` , please read our written scripture-researched study on The Truth about Marriage . To obtain your FREE copy of the FirstFruits.' Purified Scriptures (FPS) in MS Word (doc.) format click on the menu tab under 'Free Scriptures.' Back to Top We are follower s of The Way of Yâ-hwéh Yâhuwshúa ` , the Narrow Path, and by the supports of Wisdom, we only follow Yâhuwshúa`our Husband, Who said He is "the Truth, the Way, and the Life."

Our recommended videos exposing the works of darkness with our Sword, Who is Yahuwshua. GALLERY

Yshá`Yâhuw 29:1-7 e 1. “ Hówy to the city (f.) of the demon-lion ( ’ariy’ë´l ) which kept being errant , Dâwíth the worker of goodness battled. Gather ye together by hand the offspring, the year Yisrâ’ë´l [ is ] outside, on the year, because ye of Yâ-hwéh shall eat together with Yisrâ’Ë´l from its own Father ( Mow’â´v ) ; 2. Because of Yâ-hwéh , I shall squeeze out the demon-lion ( ’ariy’ë´l ) of Yisrâ’ë´l , though it shall become Y huwthâ´h , [ ~out ] of the same one (f.) [ ~city ] of the Son; she [ is ] not strong of Yisrâ’ë´l , and not belonging to the ones [ is ] the wealth pertaining to Me 3. of Yisrâ’ë´l , so I shall encircle, like Dâwíth, because Yisrâ’ë´l outside [ is ] against you of Yisrâ’ë´l , and I shall cast around Yisrâ’ë´l [ being ] y ou a palisade of Yisrâ’ë´l , and I shall place/set around Yisrâ’ë´l [ being ] you, fortified towers 4. of Yisrâ’ë´l , and shall be reduced to inferior ones the ones not the words of The Way the ones (n.) [ are ] making become of you among My Yisrâ’ë´l , of the one (f.) not [ being ] the Land (f.) in Truth of Yisrâ’ë´l . And among My Yisrâ’ë´l of the one (f.) not [ being ] the Land (f.) in Truth , the ones not the words of The Way the ones (n.) [ are ] making become of you, they shall sink down Yisrâ’ë´l , so it shall become Y huwthâ´h like the ones not summoning, from outside of He Who “I shall exist ( ’e-hyéh ) Yisrâ’ë´l,” [ being ] the one (n.) [ ~wild beast (n.) ] not of the Land in Truth . She [ is ] not The Voice the ones (n.) [ are ] making become of you of Yisrâ’ë´l , even with regards to all Yisrâ’ë´l , pertaining to the ones not [ being ] the ground/base (n.) , she [ is ] not : The Voice the ones (n.) [ are ] making become of you shall be powerless, 5. of Yisrâ’ë´l , and it shall become Y huwthâ´h like the raised dust separated from you , Yisrâ’ë´l of the war-chariot wheel, without regard for He Who [ is ] the Wealth of the ones not [ of ] the adversary ( sâţâ´n ) of the irreverent ones of Yisrâ’ë´l , and like the chaff/dust bearing the injustice of Yisrâ’ë´l , then it shall become Y huwthâ´h like the moment, instantly 6. from beside Yisrâ’ë´l , of the “Yâ-hwéh ” of the war-armies ( tsvâ’ówth ) [ ~a demon named thus by the adversary ] , because the overseer of the passion of Yâ-hwéh shall become Y huwthâ´h – accompanying no one of Yisrâ’ë´l of the thunder of Yisrâ’ë´l , and of the earthquake of Yisrâ’ë´l, and of the voice/sound of the great wrath, the storm [is] coming down, bearing the injustice of Yisrâ’ë´l – yet the Flame of the consuming fire 7. of Yisrâ’ë´l, even it shall become Y huwthâ´h , like one without regard for he who [ is ] one dreaming the Testimony ( `ëd ) within, among the ones of Yisrâ’ë´l with the sleep without regard for He Who [ is ] the Wealth of the ones not [ of ] the adversary ( sâţâ´n ) , of the heathen masses of all the ones [ ~of middle Yisrâ’ë´l ] , because as far as the river [ ~unto the death ] they march against that Yisrâ’ë´l outside, against demon-lion ( ’ariy’ë´l ) , and of Yisrâ’ë´l , all the ones that [ are ], not the ones, [ are ] ones serving in the army against Yisrâ’ë´l outside that is “ Yruwshâláim ” of Yisrâ’ë´l , and all the ones that [ are ] , not the ones, [ are ] ones the hand [ is ] gathering together against Yisrâ’ë´l outside [ being ] the same one (f.) [ ~sister (unpaired néphesh (f.)) ] [ being ] the Son of Yisrâ’ë´l , though the ones (m.) pressuring/compressing [ are ] the same one (f.) [ being ] the Son 8. of Yisrâ’ë´l ” … e e e e e e e previous page

Yâ-hwéh Yâhuwshúa`.reunites our male Spirit Envoy with its counterpart, our spiritual néphesh (female) making us One again. GUARDIANS OF THE MARRIAGE CHAMBER Our Mission: Restoring The Marriage Chamber Who Are We? “Know yourself ” – we all ought to identify who we are, for our own sake, not to proclaim it, rather, to do our mission. Like a blossoming flower, we develop into what we are meant to become, without self-seeking. So seeking to help our fellow brothers and sisters who originated from our Home, outside of this chaos, to restore them for those to also develop into their potential, we also had to find the Truth we all needed first. Yâhuwshúa` is that Truth, Yâhuwshúa` is our Freedom and Wealth to emerge clean from this chaos. And the scriptural details about how, like our selves, were buried under by the rulers (archons) of this world, to try to prevent us from ever germinating the Seed of Life. So we have geared this website to cater to secondary higher-level of understanding, for those who have already decided to accept Yâhuwshúa`, the Word of Yâ-hwéh, to help the new followers of The Way, Yâhuwshúa`, to understand the details of how this true Marriage relationship works in the true Marriage Chamber. Because the descriptive terms used for material metaphors do not, and cannot strictly define the spiritual concepts. For us who love Him more than anyone/anything, even more than our lives, and acknowledge and recognize to accurately identify Him and what is not Him, we keep our Marriage Chamber undefiled from the entrance of any emanations of the adversary, not heeding their distractions – this is to guard our Marriage Chamber, preparing for it to be sealed shut. We are guardians of the Marriage Chamber, but the adversary evolved the term for that in scriptures, to scorn us and draw attention away from it. Know yourself - if you are one of His lights. If you existed before the foundation of this temporary material corruptible world, if you are not from this world, if you are not one originating from the darkness, return to the Light. Remove your obstacles, throw off the chains of enslaving error, wake up to Life by obtaining Yâhuwshúa`, the Resurrection. It is one’s mission to unbury one’s self (néphesh) to despise and subdue the lust of the dirt-body’s misleading one of the flesh, become what He conceived you to be, by means of Him, understanding how this relationship works, and remember your mission to help others of the Light too. Click here to see the differences between affectionate love and erotic 'eros' satan's version of "love". How Did We Get Down Here (Outside)? Our néphesh "souls" have fallen into material bodies. How did this happen? Our inner man’s spiritual “seed” is thought of as female; it originated from Yâ-hwéh the Most High, having a male counterpart/envoy in the highest regions above the material world or Fullness (Pleroma). In the fall, our spiritual néphesh became separated from its envoy. This separation is said to lead to our mortality and our expulsion from the Light into the world of matter, the matrix (womb) for us to someday germinate the Seed and grow, thus matter is mater, the mother we are not to follow. Yâhuwshúa came “to give life unto those who had died by separation and join them together (i.e., with their counterpart)” (Glad Tidings of Phílippos 70:15-18). The envoys were said to have accompanied Him when He descended into this material world, because “He went forth outside the Limit (of the realm Light) and, being an Envoy of the Fullness, He brought with Him the envoys of the Superior Seed, and since He had proceeded from the Fullness, He Himself had the redemption, but He brought the envoys with Him for the correction of the Seed.” (Excerpts of Theodotus 35:1-2) These are the envoys who heralded the birth of Yâhuwshúa` (cf. Luwqá’s 2:6-14). The envoys are said to have shared in the immersion of Yâhuwshúa` in the Yardë´n (MattithYâ´huw 3:13-17 pars). The teacher Theodotus claims that “In the beginning, the envoys were immersed through the redemption of the Name which came down upon Yâhuwshúa` in the winged-creature (“dove”) and redeemed Him” (Excerpts of Theodotus 22:6). He claimed that they, the envoys, are immersed (for the sake of) the dirt-men “in order that we too, possessing the Name, may not be held back and prevented by the Limit or the Cross from entering the Fullness” (Excerpts of Theodotus 22:4). The envoys took an active role in the salvation of the individual. According to Theodotus, “They entreat and supplicate for us as if for a part of them, and, being restrained for our sake in their haste to enter (the realm of Light), they plead for forgiveness for us, in order that we may enter in with them; for they virtually have need of us that they may enter, since without us it is not permitted to them.” (Excerpts of Theodotus 35:3-4). Similarly, Heraklion says, “The Savior, Who is also the Son of Man, harvests and sends as reapers the envoys, each for his own néphesh.”(Heraklion Fragment 35) Through our communion in the Marriage Chamber, “we are raised equal to envoys, restored to the males, member to member, to form a unity” (Excerpts of Theodotus 22:2). One is said to be joined to one’s envoy just as a bride is joined to her bridegroom so that once united “with one another, they become a single life” (Exegesis on the Soul 132: 34-35 cf. 1 Moshéh 2:24). This is regarded as the restoration of the original condition before the fall. Scripture explains that the Father is within them and we are within the Father “…being perfect, being undivided in the truly Good One, being in no way deficient in anything, and they are refreshed in the Spirit” (Glad Tidings of the Truth 42:27-33). Joining with one’s envoy was said to allow the person to lead an errorless existence (Glad Tidings of Phílippos 65:23-26). The Marriage Chamber The marriage chamber is the place of reconciliation made by Yâ-hwéh Yâhuwshúa` Who reunites our male Spirit Envoy (an emanation of Yâ-hwéh) with its counterpart, our spiritual néphesh (female) making us One again. GT of Phílippos (Glad Tidings of Phílippos – Nag Hammadi Library - http://gnosis.org/naghamm/GPhilip-Meyer.html ) (note: we disclaim false terms for Him and poor translations of the blind) – The marriage chamber in decoded scriptures is also considered the throne room of Yâ-hwéh Yâhuwshúa`, taking place in the spiritual realm within the children of the Light (foreheads). The Bridal Chamber is revealed to the believers of Yâ-hwéh Yâhuwshúa`, namely to those who have received the marital ceremony (five Seals) - Repentance, Immersion, Reconciliation through a name, a Companion, and a Garment of Light. The marital ceremony is where the Bride and Bridegroom come together as One element to become the Perfect Man (Complete). How Do We Get Rescued? Yâhuwshúa is our masculine Spirit Envoy from the realm of Light, which descended to our mother Wisdom. This occurrence is manifesting in these lower regions with our feminine néphesh below in order to redeem her and ascend together to the Highest Heaven of the Existing One, and they reunite in the Marriage Chamber. The “Exegesis of the Soul,” tells us that our néphesh is feminine when it descends into the lower regions of chaos, acquiring a dirt-body. “As long as she (the néphesh) was alone with the Father, she was a virgin and in the form of the Male and female. But when she fell down into a [dirt] body and came to this life, then she fell into the hands of many robbers.” (Exegesis of the Soul)- As feminine, the néphesh seeks to unite with a male. But, being in the dirt-body, the only form of union it can find is sexual union, and the only males it can find are emanations of satan - masculine demons. She consorts with these masculine demons, prostituting herself until finally, she repents. In response, the Father sends her the Bridegroom, the Anointed One. In preparation, she ‘cleanses’ herself through the celebration of immersion into His name and the Marriage Chamber. For more information on the Truth about Marriage , please also see this page . Why am I Not Seeing “guardian of The Marriage Chamber” in My KJV? A guardian of the Marriage Chamber is the first and true definition of the Greek term transliterated as “Eunuch”. This true Marriage is one where we, “the ones” will be faithful, guarding the chamber against the intrusions of the archons. Thus we, becoming guardians of the Marriage Chamber, protect our spiritual Garment of Light to walk The Way, following after the example of the Anointed One and Wisdom. In the Glad Tidings of Tâ’ówm, PSR, ("Gospel of Thomas”) 46:11, Yâhuwshúa` says the ‘guardians of the marriage chamber’ (“eunuchs”) are the ones who enter into the Marriage Chamber, who were paired (“married”) to a spiritual Being from the regions of the Most-High, the Eternal One [Yâ-hwéh Yâhuwshúa`] (“Upper Aeon” – Eternal One) with Yâ-hwéh Yâhuwshúa` as the Center of the two. Because His spirit is Male and the néphesh is female (the envoy + the image), we each individually are united within the Marriage Chamber with Yâ-hwéh Yâhuwshúa`, our Center. Here is what Yâhuwshúa` said to His pupils about the guardians of the marriage chamber, “the ones,” who forego carnal marriage to prefer the true Marriage [from properly translated MattithYâ´huw 19: 11-12]: “ Not all the ones leave room to receive the One [being] this Word, nevertheless pertaining to the ones [ ~Type A] it has been granted because they [~ Type A ] become the guards of the Marriage Chamber: whoever ones (m.) from out of the belly of the mother were born thus, these are those who have not erred [Shëm Towv] , and they become guards of the Marriage Chamber. Whoever ones were made eunuchs, under of the ones of the dirt-men [~not servants of the name (1 Moshéh 3: 20)] , yet they become guards of the Marriage Chamber; whoever ones made guards of the Marriage Chamber of themselves, who subdue their desire for the sake of the One, the Kingdom of the One of the heavens [Yâ-hwéh] , these are those who enter into great prominence [Shëm Towv] . He who is one being able to make room to receive it, let him give room to accept it. ” – Are you able to make room to receive it? Any interpreter knows one cannot translate something if one does not understand the message. When the interpreter has a different definition of a word than the speaker, the message is lost in the transmission. In fact, this is why we are using the true translation “guardian of the Marriage Chamber” instead of the commonly mistakenly defined Greek term, here. When a “Bible translator” thinks a guardian of the marriage chamber means a castrated man, he doesn’t understand the message and cannot translate it correctly, so the “Bible translator” fudges it to try to make it make sense; therefore making it totally inconsistent and cutting off the very branch they are sitting on. See here how the KJV’s Matthew 19: 11-12 lost the message in transmission. Compare! 11 But he said unto them, All men cannot receive this saying, save they to whom it is given. 12 For there are some eunuchs, which were so born from their mother’s womb: and there are some eunuchs, which were made eunuchs of men: and there be eunuchs, which have made themselves eunuchs for the kingdom of heaven’s sake. He that is able to receive it let him receive it. They made it entirely material and undesirable, changing the entire passage making it about the carnal marriage, and the only escape or alternative to the obligation of the farm-work of sâtâ´n is to have a surgical castration. In Old English, via Latin eunuchus from Greek eunoukhos , literally ‘bedroom guard,’ is from eunē ‘bed’ + a second element related to ekhein ‘to hold.’ Here is the Online Bible Lexicon ’s definition “eunuch,” of Greek Strong’s #2135. Take note of the residual remaining true meanings in bold type. 2135 εὐνοῦχος eunouchos yoo-noo’-khos from eune (a bed) and 2192; n m; TDNT-2:765,277; {See TDNT 272 } AV-eunuch 8; 8 1) a bed keeper, bed guard, superintendent of the bedchamber, chamberlain 1a) in the palace of oriental monarchs who support numerous wives the superintendent of the women’s apartment or harem, an office held by eunuchs 1b) an emasculated man, a eunuch 1b1) eunuchs in oriental courts held by other offices of greater held by the Ethiopian eunuch mentioned in #Ac 8:27-39. 1c) one naturally incapacitated 1c1) for marriage 1c2) begetting children 1d) one who voluntarily abstains from marriage The Nag Hammadi Library’s scholars made an attempt to translate MattithYahuw 19:11-12 and note, that they too made the same materialistic scribal mistake to interpret these verses as something material. “The pupils of Yâhuwchânâ’n (John) marry and are given in marriage; but my pupils neither marry nor are given in marriage, but are as the envoys of Yâ-hwéh in (the highest) heaven. But I said: If, then, it be sin to have to do with a woman, it is not good to marry. And the Sovereign said unto me: Not every person can receive this Word (&c., Matt. xix.11, 12).” – Cathar Texts - The Secret Supper - The Book of John What Other Scriptures Also Describe us and the Marriage Chamber? “In this world, the slaves serve the free. Among the royalty of Yâ-hwéh, the free will minister to the slaves: the children of the Marriage Chamber will minister to the children of carnal marriage. The children of the Marriage Chamber have just one name: Rest. Altogether, they need take no other form, because they have contemplation. They are numerous in the things of Yâ-hwéh [Yâhuwshúa`." – The Gospel of Phillip “It, Immersion, is also called ‘Marriage Chamber’ because of the agreement and the indivisible state of those who know they have known Him. It is also called ‘the Light which does not set and is without flame’ since it does not give light, but those who have worn it are made into Light.” -Tripartite Tractate 128:33 “Indeed, [the true] marriage in the world is a mystery for those who have taken a [carnal] wife. If there is a hidden quality to the marriage of defilement, how much more is the undefiled marriage a true mystery? It is not fleshly, but pure. It belongs not to desire, but to the will. It belongs not to the darkness or the night, but to the day and the light.”\ – The Book of the Two Principles "The Marriage Chamber is as a marriage of the néphesh with ‘the Mind’ rather than ‘the spirit’. The néphesh scorns the body and its ‘drunkeness’ to embrace the Mind’s light: “O néphesh (soul), persistent one, be sober and shake off your drunkenness, which is the work of ignorance (lower creator). If you persist and live in the (dirt)-body, you dwell in rusticity. When you entered into a bodily birth, you were begotten. Come into being inside the Marriage Chamber! Be illuminated in Mind!” – Silvanus We Who Are in United in the Marriage Chamber Leave Behind Physical Desire “But then the bridegroom, according to the father's will, came down to her into the bridal chamber, which was prepared. And he decorated the bridal chamber. For since that marriage is not like the carnal marriage, those who are to have intercourse with one another will be satisfied with that intercourse. And as if it were a burden, they leave behind them the annoyance of physical desire and they turn their faces from each other.” – Exegesis of the Soul “Those who are separated will unite [with their envoys.] and will be filled. Everyone who will enter the Marriage Chamber will keep the Light lit for [the Bridegroom] just as the [carnal] marriages [do] which happen at night; that fire [burns] only at night, and is put out. But the mysteries of the Marriage Chamber are perfected rather in the day and the light, and neither day nor night it sets. If anyone becomes a son of the Marriage Chamber, he will receive the Light. If anyone does not receive it while he is here [material creation], he will not be able to receive it in the other Place. He who will receive that Light will not be seen, nor can he be detained. And none [of satan’s agents/demons] shall be able to torment a person like this, even while he dwells in the world. And again when he leaves the world, he has already received the Truth in the images [dirt body].” – Gospel of Phillip “When the whole seed is perfected the Savior and Wisdom [will] form a pair (syzygy). These then are said to be Bridegroom and Bride, and the Marriage Chamber is the entire All. The spiritual beings will divest themselves of their néphesh [physical life] and become intelligent spirits, and, without being hindered or seen, they will enter into the All, and will be bestowed as brides on the envoys surrounding the Savior.” -Irenaeus, Adversus Haereses 1.7.1. Those having read the above scriptures who have known us see that we are ones described there, with our throne room correctly occupied of Yâ-hwéh Yâhuwshúa. We are ones from the 144K of His witnesses to come to testify to the peoples after surviving the pruning of our blind brothers at the Sixth Seal; we are who will convert the Great Multitude. But now among our hardened blind brothers who reject His name, our situation is similar to those always outnumbered few, holding firmly to the correct Truth, in times of spiritual warfare against the hordes of errant bá`al worshippers (Bá`al = “Lord” in English). We also abstain and forbear from carnal desires and distractions of this world, to guard our Marriage Chamber. We volunteered, since a long ago (before satan was misbegotten, the father of time) way before this life, to assist Yâhuwshúa` in the end-times to spread His Glad Tidings and Saving Testimony, to spread His call, His name, which is the song (pronunciation) that only we know, by means of Him we actively acknowledge. back to top Since Immersion was understood as an immersion into the watery Light of the Eternal One in the highest Heavens, Yâ-hwéh Yâhuwshúa` (Upper Aeons) , the conversion emerged from the glowing sparkling/immersive [living] waters with His ‘garment of Light’. Such an immersion was interpreted, at the same time, as a union or marriage with the Light in the Marriage Chamber. The conversion was seen to be the feminine néphesh and the Father was the masculine Light. These two were ‘united in the Marriage Chamber’, and from that time onward, the néphesh wore the ‘garment of Light’ in remembrance of her union with the Father. love defined

Know what happens when, in The End Times in this combined calendar with Accurate, astronomically vetted Scriptural, Roman, AND Jewish calendar dates, with explanations. SEPARATION “Judgment” SEASON CALENDAR to open calendar ctrl + Left click - allow browser to view