Report any issue with "No results found"

Yahwehyahuwshua.org is a successor website to Yahuwshua.org. We are independently researched - not following any near-miss name groups. We offer end-times predictions and free scriptures for all to help 144K to remember Him and return to The Way of Yâ-hwéh Yâhuwshúa`. ENTRA ENTER The Way of Yâ-hwéh Yâhuwshúa` End times predictions

The Most High is inviting All You non-satinists to leave them behind! But are you one of His 144K helpers? Find out His plan for you here. THE INVITATION OF THE MOST HIGH The Majority Will Accept His Invitation The majority coming to exist will accept His invitation upon resurrecting. The chosen few already existing will be activated by His invitation. Which are you? If you are here, there are no coincidences. Is this because the Most High is inviting you? Or are you one of His chosen few? Thus, they shall be the Profession of Yâ-hwéh ( Yâhuwthâ´h) , the ones (m.) not the last-ones (m.) in temporal succession, the first in rank of one overcoming the demon (yisrâ’ë´l) , so the ones (m.) not the first-ones (m.) in temporal succession [ are ] the last-ones ( m .) in rank. For this reason, the Many ones ( m .) of Yâ-hwéh who (pl.) come to exist, the middle , [ are ] ones-invited (m.), but the few (m.) to drink of Yâ-hwéh [ are ] the ones-chosen ( m. ) .” - MattithYâ´huw 20: 16 Wisdom is cautious. Examine the circumstances of your being here. If you are here seeking Him, you will find Him as He said. If not, you will not, though we have. With His guidance, apply caution to verify everything you find along your path to find Him. Falsehoods are dead-ends though they may run parallel to the authentic Way. And one could attempt to verify every single doctrine taught, but the problem lies in the fact that, how can that one know what is true, not having His guidance? That is why one can take the shortcut to scripturally-guaranteed verification by verifying one straightforward thing: whether the sources you are considering trusting have, or do not have His actual names. According to inspired scriptures, anything coming from someone who doesn’t have His real names is not reliable for absolute trust. Therefore, the first step in vetting your sources for information is seeing if they know His actual names. If not, the source is unreliable, though they may have some truth in their parallel detour ways. Besides for the purpose of verifying your path, having His names correct is the beginning of one’s proper walk on The Way of Yâ-hwéh Yâhuwshúa` , to find yourself on His true Rock. Acknowledging Him is the key to the treasures of Wisdom and Knowledge which follow after accepting His Word of The Way . (Colossians 2: 2-3) That explains the first purpose of the YahwehYahuwshua.org website being, to teach the chosen few the true dual-names of the Most High, which are Yâ-hwéh Yâhuwshúa`: And to prove them to you beyond any doubt or question we have ever encountered; because after that, it lets the ones who profess Him accurately learn all the relevant truth, so that we can help them learn more, undoing the disinformation brainwash through lies and deception done by the ruler of this world, the adversary. Anyone having come here must by now have been through the “great awakening” of this world, to wake up to the revelation that this world is indeed ruled by sâţâ´n and his followers, as well as waking the non-sâţâ´nists’ great anger at their inability to change that. Anger happens when one thinks one’s rights and authority are being violated. Non-sâţâ´nists were deceived to think non-sâţâ´nists rule this world, and now these see that all those ruling in every department are sâţâ´nists, who now have come out of the closet. They think to correct this world, but get angry that nothing happens. This anger is not shared by the ones within Him because these understand that sâţâ´n is who made this world and he is its god and rules it with his followers, so we do not expect them to honor us with rights to decide or to honor our preferences about this world. They were only pretending to be non-sâţâ´nists, to be accepted as their leaders. Now the sâţâ´nists want to finish fully corrupting non-sâţâ´nists. And the non-sâţâ´nists refusal to accept their authority is the cause of the Great Anger of yisrâ’ë´l, which comes from sâţâ´n, who hopes to make it SO huge, they may lose their peace and do sâţâ´nist things like violence. 80. Yâhuwshúa` said, “Whoever has come to understand the world has discovered a carcass, and whoever has discovered the carcass, the world is not worthy of that man.” So, the ones within Him overcome the adversary by means of His true names, but the non-sâţâ´nists overcome the adversary by refusing his authority over them to the death. But if you are one of His chosen ones, hearing His voice will activate you to acknowledge Him, overcome this world, and come to exist as one overcoming the demon – the meaning of yisrâ’ë´l. At this point, examine yourself for the answer to that age-old question within you: could you be chosen? Consider: Are you interested in finding out whether this is true about overcoming sâţâ´n, and in helping others? Or are you being moved to leave? Signs can point out which is the answer. Speaking plainly, without citing all the references, these are signs: if you are one chosen, you will love the sound of His names and the fragrance of the knowledge of the Anointed One, and you will be able to learn both of His dual-names, Yâ-hwéh Yâhuwshúa`, and retain them, and even more, feel compelled to use them and to stop using false names for Him. And you will also hunger to learn more truth and understand, even though the world be against you. Therefore, we forward you His invitation, whether you are one of the ones chosen, or one of the middle. But why should one just invited, “the middle”, not being the chosen few, desire to know these things anyhow, if we all also know that the salvation of all non-sâţâ´nists is just around the corner, for those not falling into sâţâ´nism by worshipping the impostor (who is sâţâ´n)? This is also important. Why do you say the Most High has "dual-names"? The Secret Book (Apocrypha) of Yâhuwchânâ´n (“John”) says: “...Each has its own realm modeled on one of the higher realms. And each new name refers to a glory in the heavens So that Yaldabaoth’s demons might be destroyed. The demons’ own names, given by Yaldabaoth, are mighty names, but the powers’ names reflecting the glory above will bring about the demons’ destruction and remove their power. That is why each has two names . Yaldabaoth modeled his creation on the pattern of the original realms above him so that it might be just like the indestructible realms. [Not that he had ever seen the indestructible ones. Rather, the power in him, deriving from his mother, made him aware of the pattern of the cosmos above.]” -Author: Stevan Davies, (2005), “The Secret Book of John” for the Nag Hammadi Library (disclaimer : we do not capitalize power in this context or 'yaldabaoth' which refers to demons) The scripture above is why the Most High has two names. Scriptures, decoded, calls these the dual-names (in Hebrew, ha-shimáyim), which means precisely “the dual-names,” but was altered by sâţâ´nic scribes hiding this into “ha-shâmáyim,” a dual-form which has no linguistic basis for a single form, and which they translate as “the heavens” everywhere in their scripture translations, to substitute for the mention of the existence of dual-names, and conceal the fact. This is the question: Why should we offer this ‘higher knowledge’ (gnosis) to everybody non-sâţâ´nist, if according to scriptures, while biologically living, the middle: non-sâţâ´nists and Christians (not being these 144,000), are not capable of accepting and switching to His actual names, to become these 144,000 chosen ones? Yâhuwshúa` spoke to the masses in parables because they could not handle the higher knowledge that He communicated privately to His twelve pupils, referred to as ‘gnosis.' And this world’s sâţâ´nists made an “establishment church” to control the Christians, and reckoned correctly that if they allowed the higher knowledge among the Many, who are the middle non-sâţâ´nists, they would be unable to handle it, like those masses handling only parables. Therefore, they were allowed to ‘dumb it down’ because they preferred to have a vast, powerful constituency over teaching the Truth. Conflict of interest, but they were closet satanists , as are the authorities of this world because sâţâ´n rules this world, and his priority was to prevent anyone from overcoming himself, so his first list of things to do to ‘dumb it down’ was to remove His name from the memory of the world. Irenaeus, one of the so-called “church fathers,” was utterly opposed to any “higher knowledge” or higher ranks among believers, objecting even to the idea that our Savior spoke privately to His pupils. Irenaeus was a sâţâ´nist. Having higher authority than him or other sâţâ´nists, we rename him “Erroneous.” Though being so-called Christians in the eyes of this world, they enforced the sâtâ´nic-jewish order in Acts 4: 17 prohibiting the teaching of the name of Yâhuwshúa`. And this is why you haven’t heard the name of Yâ-hwéh Yâhuwshúa` being taught in any Christian church. It was meant to be preserved by His chosen ones and to be introduced to the middle when the right moment comes that the ‘middle’ can hear and learn it when freed from the spiritual impediments and carnal handicaps. But can’t everyone believe in His proper names now ? Although every single one, A-Z, of the finite perfect number in the Mind of our Father, shall believe in His true dual-name testimony at the End, there are apparent specific times which are predicted for when each vessel (category) of yisrâ’ë´l comes to exist, believing and professing His true names. And as the Most High likes palindromes, the reverse order of the falling of these ones into the darkness is the order of their restoration into His Light, as He expressed in the verse above, MattithYâ´huw 20: 16. The next group on His schedule is all the middle to be ransomed from death. Did you say, “ransomed from death”? Yes. If you have noticed from sâţâ´n’s “great awakening,” their plan is the ‘depopulation’ genocide, without telling you it’s the elimination of all non-sâţâ´nists from the face of this earth. But they do not realize that their staying biologically alive while murdering the non-sâţâ´nists is separating the ones the Most High prefers in order to apply the Ransom He already paid. And they, in their greed, will finally bite off more than they can chew and murder His 144,000 witnesses too. This mistake, similar to their murdering Yâhuwshúa` on the cross, results in the right moment coming that the middle is capable of hearing and learning Yâ-hwéh Yâhuwshúa`’s testimony and being equipped with all they need to acquire the standing in His sight, in the middle; this is the meaning of 'anastasis' in Greek, which you find translated as “resurrection.” As explained, this is His gift to the middle, giving up His children to free the middle from the captivity that has been in an extended stay in this cosmos of darkness, hindered from entering into the Light, and worsened at that point by being unable to even get out of sh’ówl with the usual recycling into new babies (see our page What is reincarnation? On Recycling ). That is why the sâţâ´nists are sterilizing and promoting abortion, to prevent these non-sâţâ´nists from returning. Why mention His true names now to the middle sincere Christians if they cannot believe them yet? Because the hierarchy of the middle ones who cannot believe, nonetheless gathers benefits from not opposing the Most High and resisting the misled impulse to join with those doing so. In this upside-down world, not opposing Him will be better for them than doing the popular thing to oppose His witnesses. If you prefer death to the worship of sâţâ´n, you will be Ransomed. The widow, who is yisrâ’ë´l underneath, are sâţâ´nists knowingly, and they are refusing His ransom, refused our Passover Lamb. Passover meant 'Exemption', so they declined the Exemption and stay behind while we are to be evacuated from among them. Therefore, while the middle is still biologically alive, His witnesses of His true names will be first working to persuade non-sâţâ´nists not to worship sâţâ´n’s impostor, his ‘antichrist’ incarnation, and not apply the name Yâ-hwéh to that impostor. But His witnesses are not avoiding to mention Yâ-hwéh Yâhuwshúa`, so these middle ones can learn not to carnally instinctively oppose His names Yet notice : this main message for all non-sâţâ´nists to not worship the impostor (who is sâţâ´n), and for Christians to believe in the Work our Savior did on the cross, and to not believe the impostor claiming to be Him has been taught already for centuries ! It made it through the censorship since it’s the most critical thing to tell the non-sâţâ´nist middle! Yâ-hwéh Yâhuwshúa` made that happen! The information war which sâţâ´n made against that lost. So since the sâţâ´nists couldn’t beat that, they joined that and compensated by trying to turn the rest sâţâ´nic, even declaring ‘higher knowledge’ (gnosis) ‘satanic’ to prevent people from looking at it. Those sources even credit Erroneous (Irenaeus) for that! The witnesses who come to help the middle non-sâţâ´nists will both be gathered together , resurrected from physical death, at the same time, when the middle will all have come into existence of true yisrâ’ë´l (“Israel”), becoming “one overcoming the demon (‘ël)” (see the ‘ Elohim is not my Yâ-hwéh ' : satanic name substitutes misidentify Who we worship webpage). So, The Way of both the chosen and the invited middle go through death, overcoming it, as Yâhuwshúa` also did, in case you thought “salvation” meant not needing to die physically. The Way all these overcome the adversary is different: chosen believers on His true names overcome sâţâ´n by their belief while living, through Him Who defeated sâţâ´n, Who said He is The Way, believing on the Fruit. And non-sâţâ´nists and the ones of the tree/cross defeat sâţâ´n by refusing to worship sâţâ´n all The Way to the death of their temporary dirt-bodies, The Way of the cross: the Tree. Therefore, name-believers defeat sâţâ´n while alive, and cross followers after having died by preferring death over worshipping sâţâ´n. Remember the prodigal son, who returned after death, and the reassurance given to the elder son. Who had it more pleasant? One had it carnally pleasant until the times of trouble came; the other stayed with the Father. Who ended up with the inheritance? If you were the elder son, wouldn’t you like to know this is who you are, before the real trouble comes for the younger son? Are the Glad Tidings about which is the more pleasant way? Does it say that salvation has less hardship for the ones who believe in His names? No, the narrow Way is not described that way, and those Glad Tidings are not for the chosen ones. In fact, decoded Márquwç (“Mark”) 13: 10 says: …and among My one overcoming the demon (yisrâ’ë´l), all the ones (n.) tha t [ are ] not belonging to the one (f.) [ ~sister (underneath) ] [ being ] heathen masses (n.) , it behooves first to be proclaimed that the glad tidings (n.) [ are ] not pertaining to the ones (n./m.) ! The chosen ones are only relatively few, with 144,000 witnesses to be sealed. The Glad Tidings to be preached throughout this world is not about those few getting saved by having believed in His names! It is about the ones who currently have no regard for His true names also getting saved. In fact, this is the main question non-sâţâ´nists ask when we teach His true names! Examine below how Yâhuwshúa` says that a middle one having died separated from Him, if they trust in Him within the chosen ones He sends down to them, these shall live! He was speaking to a person in the middle about “Lazarus.” Yâhuwchânâ´n (“John”) 11: 25-26 decoded says: “ I, I cause to exist she [ ~unpaired néphesh (f.) ] which [ is ] not the (1) Standing in the middle ( Anastasis ) (f.) to bring forwards one overcoming the demon ( yisrâ’ë´l ), and she [ ~unpaired néphesh (f.) ] which [ is ] not the (2) Life (f.) . (1) he who without regard, [ is ] the one (m.) putting his trust on My one overcoming the demon (yisrâ’ë´l ), upon Me, even if he might die separated of Me, he shall be made to live of Me! And of one overcoming the demon ( yisrâ’ë´l ) , [ is ] (2) everyone that [ is ] he who [ is ] without regard for the One living of one overcoming the demon ( yisrâ’ë´l ) , yet [ is ] the one putting his trust on My one overcoming the demon ( yisrâ’ë´l ) , upon Me, who [ is ] not sâţâ´n, lest of the father of the sovereign ( ’avadówn ) , he might die separated of Me among My one overcoming the demon ( yisrâ’ë´l ) [ ~widow underneath ] of the one (n./m.) [ ~Yehuwthâ´h/sâţâ´n ] not [ being ] the Eternal One! … ” What about the "Glad Tidings of the Kingdom"? And when is that supposed to happen? Yâhuwshúa` said, in decoded MattithYâ´huw (“Matthew”) 24: 14: And of one overcoming the demon ( yisrâ’ë´l ) , shall be openly proclaimed/published this thing (n.) [ ~glad tidings (n.) ] [ is ] not pertaining to the ones (n./m.) : The glad tidings (n.) , [ being ] the one (n.) not of the royalty among the ones (m.) within one overcoming the demon ( yisrâ’ë´l ) , [ is ] pertaining to the entire (f.) [ ~unpaired néphesh (f.) sister ] [ being ] the one (f.) [ ~middle sister ] not the one (f.) being indwelled/inhabited, among My one overcoming the demon ( yisrâ’ë´l ) [ being ] the Testimony – [ “Yâhuwshúa` is Yâ-hwéh” ] belonging to all the ones (n.) that [ are ] not [ being ] the one (m.) [ ~counterfeit Savior, Yehuwthâ´h ] belonging to the heathen masses of one overcoming the demon ( yisrâ’ë´l ), and whenever that is, shall arrive, not pertaining to the ones (n./m.) , the termination (n.) . [ ~pruning the widow to do Holocaust of the middle sister (2 Moshéh 20: 18-19)] Note that these decoded verses reveal some things unknown in Christianity! “The ones (m.) ” is a term referring to existent ones who profess His true names, Yâ-hwéh Yâhuwshúa` , and here He calls these “ the royalty ”. As you see, the Glad Tidings is not for the royals , meaning not for the 144,000 Witnesses professing His true names getting saved. Scriptures say that those of yisrâ’ë´l above were already purchased (redeemed) after His resurrection. He says the Glad Tidings is about all the middle yisrâ’ë´l non-sâţâ´nists who do not, as yet, have the Testimony. However, the Glad Tidings is not for the heathen masses being the sâţâ´nists who are being the impostor, sâţâ´n incarnate. Their rescue is for much later and not our priority, though blessings are pronounced for Christians who bring forwards among them. (decoded Revelation 20: 5-6) Is my King James Version (KJV) Bible inspired? Can I trust it to look for His names? Did you know “James” comes from “Jacob,” which in Hebrew is “Ya’aqóv”? “Ya’aqóv” means Supplanter and is a standard reference to the impostor in scriptures. So, the King James Version would mean “King Supplanter Version.” Is it then any wonder that the KJV supplants our King, Yâhuwshúa`, with the impostor, sâţâ´n, by substituting Him with terms about him? Wouldn’t you consider this a sign that you cannot trust it for a source to obtain the name of our true King? There is not one instance of one intact name for the Most High within the KJV. Why? The short answer is because sâţâ´n ordered his satanists to prohibit His name from being taught. (Acts 4: 17) How? Your Bible is in English. The English language did not exist since the Tower of Bavel; it was invented relatively recently as a combination of French and Germanic languages. Your Bible is a translation of scriptures written in earlier languages, namely, Hebrew and Greek. They translated the “Old Testament” from the very unreliable Masoretic “Text,” which was altered by sâţâ´nist scribes after Yâhuwshúa` ascended to deny our Savior, so the Greek LXX (Septuagint), which was translated from the earlier scripture (before coding) is more reliable. The “New Testament” was initially written in Hebrew, but they translated it from the Greek “Textus Receptus” when the most reliable Greek manuscript is the Byzantine Majority text. Nonetheless, all of these manuscripts, Hebrew and Greek, were abbreviated by the sâţâ´nist scribes using their shorthand code, and the translations of that to other languages had to be highly liberal, not strict, to make it easily legible, due to the code’s degutting of the scripture by the omissions. And even furthermore, afterward, the English establishment translators substituted all names and titles for those of sâţâ´n, making the readers think they were “translations.” One should expect the proper names of our Savior to be found rendered in scripture as original Hebrew names, transliterated into English, not transliterations of Grecianized names nor evolved common English versions. Understand that names are proper nouns that should not ever change and should be rendered according to their original sound in their language when books are translated, especially in the case of the One Whose name is pure, which we depend on to call on Him. Altered names are different names and call different ones, especially if the original One doesn’t accept other names. Notwithstanding, your KJV preferred to alter nearly every proper name to common English (per)versions used at the time by commoners. A smart move to become the best-selling book of all time, but the zealous defend it as being purer than the original! Your English Bible translation is not the inspired scriptures about which Páulus (“Paul”) spoke about to Timótheos (“Timothy”). He was referring to copies of the original Hebrew scriptures. Those scriptures did contain the true name of our Savior. Let’s look at how it appeared in those scriptures: His name, forever and for all generations, is Yâ-hwéh יָהְוֶ֨ה (often transliterated as “Yahweh”) The name of the Anointed is Yâhuwshúa` יָהוּשֻׁ֥עַ (Sometimes phonetically spelled “Yahushua”). Shallow vessels don’t search deeply and usually settle for less than the Truth. Usually, the first clue one seeking Him sees to all the alterations is seeing the Strong’s Concordance of the KJV document the sâţâ´nic title “Lord ” as having replaced #3068 Yâ-hwéh (which they misrendered as Yehovah). Surely some took that error, also found in KJV as “Jehovah,” and ran with it. But the much deeper research proving what the authentic names are is found in our name study: “Why these are the correct names” found in the FPS scripture download . My pastor says the name we use is "how we say it in English." Is this true? IMPORTANT - A name is a specific intelligible sound that summons/invokes someone, and it must sound the same to everyone, no matter what language they speak. Therefore, to render a proper name, to people of different languages, in writing, one must render that sound in the other person’s alphabet, using their phonetic system, to replicate that sound as accurately as possible. That is called a transliteration of a name. Sometimes, special characters are used in a transliteration when more than the ordinary letters are needed to be accurate. Yâ-hwéh Yâhuwshúa` is the most correct transliteration of the dual names of the Most High in English. The “â” symbol represents a sound that is known as the “short ŏ” in English phonetical symbols, which is not currently found as often in modern dictionaries, and it transliterates the Hebrew qâmets â, because we are utilizing the pronunciation symbols used in the well-known and available Strong’s Concordance Lexicon, as much as possible. We also explain our transliteration system in our Pronunciation Guide found in the FPS scripture download but learning its pronunciation is easiest using our the hidden name tutorial songs channel. On the other hand, a translation of a name is to render the meaning of a foreign name in our language, but be aware that a translation does not call the bearer of that name. These rules have been violated repeatedly in many ways in establishment bible translations, so much so that many are confused and do not even know the meaning of these terms. (Example: Këph (a rock), translated to petros (a rock), transliterated to peter (bad transliteration of petros). How does this apply in real life? Let this non-scriptural example suffice: Do you know you would not be able to call “Christopher Columbus” if he were here because you don’t know how to pronounce his name? Nor do Spanish speakers know it; they call him “Cristobal Colón.” Both are incorrect. His actual name is Italian, Cristóforo Colombo. If you’d yell the other two names at him, he’d only look at you funny; this is the same thing with almost all KJV-named people. They would not know you are calling them. This has dire and disastrous consequences when the tempestuous storm of sâţâ´n comes, and Christianity calls for help using names belonging to demons (Revelation’s “Trumpets,” see Disclosure in the FPS translation). The sâţâ´nists misled Christianity. Let’s undo that—their mission. “Jezebel” in Revelation represents sâţâ´nist infiltrators misleading Christians. And sâţâ´nists are who exalted themselves to mislead all middle yisrâ’ë´l’s many non-sâţâ´nists of this world towards sâţâ´n, including Christians. The sâţâ´nists are who altered the scriptures, which Christians depended on for information. And like everything else in this world, sâţâ´nists turn everything upside-down to put themselves on top and tell the middle there is no elite while secretly exalting themselves. Cognitive dissonance (denial) makes most find it hard to believe that one’s pastor they trusted, and looked up to, could be a sâţâ´nist, the man they hired with their offerings to do their scripture research while they were busy working. At what point does one constitute being a sâţâ´nist? Your pastor/preacher/priest went to seminary, was a tame pupil (not trained in critical thinking), and knows Yâhuwshúa` is the Most High and that He is Yâ-hwéh in Person. But he does not and would not tell anybody these are His names. His congregation would leave, and his income would end. Right there, he’s like the servant who buried the talent (MattithYâ´huw 25: 24-30). Furthermore, he is the most likely person in his church to know that the names he does teach his audience are not His names, yet still, he teaches these names. "This makes him to be preaching about someone else . And those being false names, those are lies, and your pastor/preacher/priest knows well that the father of the lie is sâţâ´n. Does he know the meaning of each term he teaches? If so, it’s worse for him, but this is sufficient. He is teaching lies of sâţâ´n, in preference over His true names. And if he knows the meanings of the lies, he knows he is a preacher of sâţâ´n. So how can one say your pastor/preacher/priest is not a sâţâ´nist? Their motivations for detaching potential true believers from the Most High were to put the middle non-sâţâ´nists under sâţâ´n’s authority to sacrifice them to him, thinking to curry favor with him and survive the judgment to come as a remnant left behind. They worship him deliberately and think their insane and temperamental creator would be less annoyed and appeased if they were alone with him, without those worshipping him in pretense only because they’re deceived. It has been them who pretended to be our leaders, to mislead us to sâţâ´n. Look: 2 Qorinthíym (“Corinthians”) 2: 17 speaks clearly about the sâţâ´nists’ disinformation, but decoded, it’s even more straightforward: For the reason that of sâţâ´n [is] not the Yâ-hwéh of Whom we exist, as the ones (m.) [are] not the remnant/left behind [ ~widow underneath ] , peddling their corruption , [ ~which is ] of the one (n./m.) [ ~Yehuwthâ´h/ sâţâ´n ] not [being] the Word (m.) of The Way (f.) [being] the ones (m.) [ ~Words (m.) (dual-names) ] not of the mighty one of ‘aharón (light-carrier/lucifer) , instead as originating from “I shall cause to exist (‘a-hyéh)” of one overcoming the demon (yisrâ’ë´l ) of the untarnished! Instead, as originating from “I shall cause to exist (‘a-hyéh)” of one overcoming the demon (yisrâ’ë´l) [ ~which are ] of the mighty one of ‘aharón (light-carrier/lucifer) against the vision-Source, we speak of Me : the one s (m.) [ ~Words (m.) (dual-names) ] not of the mighty one of ‘aharón (light-carrier/lucifer), among the ones (m.) within one overcoming the demon (yisrâ’ë´l) , [are] pertaining to the Anointed One! (The blue font information in the decoded scriptures you see here (and on this website) were omitted by sâţâ´nist scribes systematically from the establishment version of scriptures, which were translated as their authorized “Holy Bible,” utilizing their systematic code.) If you are a royal, you are a priest of the 'order of the royals of the Correctness' (the meaning of Malkëy-tsétheq). The names of Yâ-hwéh Yâhuwshúa` will elicit a positive reaction in you since it abounds in the fragrance of the knowledge of the Anointed One, whereas if you are not, it smells of doom to you. This is explained in the verses immediately preceding this verse. If these names appeal to you, it is a spiritual sign to you from Him, His Envoy to you, telling you the scent is good. If so, you may be one already existing, invited to be one of His Witnesses, the 144,000. These are the existent ones who volunteered to assist our Savior, being also saviors for the captivity which sâţâ´n is currently making of the non-sâţâ´nist and Christian middle. Since sâţâ´n, the unjust steward, has no intention of conceding the middle to the Highest, these royals are arrived and are being activated presently to do similarly as Yâ-hwéh Yâhuwshúa` did, as the Descender. His dirt-body physically died. However, the demons did not have any power over Him to apprehend Him, nor even see Him as He descended invisible to them, in His Light, to invade and take over the underworld. Then during His three nights and three days in the heart of the earth, He emptied the underworld (sh’ówl) of all but three: Qayin (Cain), Herodes (who murdered the children), and Yehuwdah (“Judas”), who was poorly advised by his demon, sâţâ´n, to kill himself and precede Yâhuwshúa`’s arrival ‘in case He might take pity on him.’ And Christians have heard that our Savior took captivity captive and ascended from there and was seen alive only by believers and not by the sâţâ´nists who paid spectators of Him to say they never saw Him but professed to have seen Him risen. And Christians have also heard that the Witnesses will also spend three and a half days physically dead, unburied, in the same Yruwshâláim (“Jerusalem”) before coming back to life. So, realize that like Yâhuwshúa`, Who they will manifest within them visibly shining following the Sixth Seal, these Witnesses will also be invulnerable to the demons whenever they may physically die after their 1260 days of testimony. So, when these are physically dead, these 144,000 pure ones will also raid and take over the underworld and empty it of the non- sâţâ´nists and Christians who will have died, murdered by the sâţâ´nists in their holocaust sacrifice to sâţâ´n you have mildly heard as “depopulation.” Because of this, these ones, the Witnesses, are reckoned as the Keys of the underworld our Savior has. Given this, have you ever sensed an urge inside you to assist our Savior during these end-times? Such feelings are memories from before your lifetime, being reminded to you. If so, examine these scriptures, which further explain why you should consider following The Way of Yâ-hwéh Yâhuwshúa`, Who did all these things before the ones. Here you will find some reasons why one should believe in His dual names than just resist believing sâţâ´n to death. Note that the “widow sister” refers to the sâţâ´nists who will be left behind. MattithYâ´huw 7: 13-14 ¶ Enter ye in charge of one overcoming the demon (yisrâ’ë´l) through not [being] the one ( n. ) [ ~Yehuwthâ´h/sâţâ´n ] of the constricted-off (f.) [ ~sister, middle ] , of the Entryway (f.) that [ is ] this One! The broad-one (f.) [ is ] she [ ~confusion ] which [ is ] not the Entryway (f.) of one overcoming the demon (yisrâ’ë´l) , and the wide-open one (f.) [ is ] she which [ is ] not The Way (f.) . She [ ~widow sister ] which [ exists ] not [ is ] the one (f.) leading off the irreverent of Me into My one overcoming the demon (yisrâ’ë´l) of the one (f.) [ ~sister, middle ] not [ being ] the extermination (f.) of one overcoming the demon (yisrâ’ë´l) , so the Many-ones (m.) [ 2 Këph 2: 2 ] , they not be the ones (m.) , the ones (m.) entering in charge of one overcoming the demon (yisrâ’ë´l) through of the same One (f.) [ ~Way (f.) ] of the Son . ¶ Which (n.) [ is ] the constricted one (f.) ? She [ ~sister, middle] which [ is ] not the Entryway (f.) of one overcoming the demon (yisrâ’ë´l) , and the one (f.) having been constricted/compressed [ is ] she which [ is ] not The Way (f.) . She [ ~widow sister] which [exists ] not [ is ] the one (f.) leading off the irreverent of Me into My one overcoming the demon (yisrâ’ë´l) of the one (f.) [ ~sister, middle] not [ being ] the Life (f.) of one overcoming the demon (yisrâ’ë´l) , yet the few-ones (m.) to drink [ ~experience] , who cause to exist [ ~Witnesses who descend] (pl.), [ are ] the ones (m.) , not the ones (m.) finding for themselves to acknowledge according as [ being ] the same one (f.) [ ~sister, middle] [being] the Son [ Songs 118: 19-20, Yshá`Yâhuw 22: 8 ] Is the invitation from Him to believe in the dual names of our Savior Yâ-hwéh Yâhuwshúa` meant to activate you? Or are you one invited but meant to overcome sâţâ´n by resisting him to the death believing in the Work done on the cross by our Savior, without His names? Both of these will be gathered together to Him after the Seventh Trumpet resurrection because the Many come to exist after their death they are ransomed from, and at that time is when all of these will have the Testimony of the dual-names of one overcoming the demon (yisrâ’ë´l): see Disclosure (Revelation) 11: 15-17, decoded in FPS. Your brothers in Yâ-hwéh Yâhuwshúa` at YahwehYahuwshua.org back to top "The last shall be first, and the first shall be last. The first, they who were created before us, therefore, are the invisibles, for they were created before men, who shall receive the mystery shall be with them in the region of the [highest] heavens.” – The Books of the Savior ( AKA“Pistis Sophia”)

Yâ-hwéh is our Savior (Shúa`), Who came down from the Highest Heavens, to deliver us from satan, the lower ruler. YAHUWSHÚA` IS YÂ-HWÉH Why do you say Yâhuwshúa` is Yâ-hwéh? Have you ever heard a Christian say, “Jesus is Lord”? Probably more often than with the definite article “Jesus is the Lord”, but if you simply capitalize what they say, King James Version style, they are saying “Jesus is the LORD”. Think about what it is they are trying to say, they are trying to say that the Anointed One Who came and lived a sinless life and gave His life on the cross and rose again and lives forever is the same One Who speaks throughout the scriptures you know as “the Old Testament”! It is a sad thing that few Christians saying this have actually thought this through, that it means that. But when we say Yâhuwshúa` is Yâ-hwéh, we are actually saying that the Anointed is the same Sovereign found throughout all scriptures, and we are saying it using His real names not the terms used in the King James Version and other scripture versions approved by this world’s establishment, which serves satan. So therefore, Christians saying “Jesus is Lord” shouldn’t have trouble with our saying Yâhuwshúa` is Yâ-hwéh, because it not only professes that the Anointed One is the Personhood of the Most High, but it says it using the proper names too. The Difference Between Yâhuwshúa`is Yâ-hwéh and “Jesus is Lord” Shouldn’t accuracy and correctness be important to us? Isn’t correctness and truth important to Him? Correctness is a modern term for the KJV term “Righteousness”. Do you want to be correct, “righteous” about His names? Error and Mistake is a modern term for the KJV term “Sin”. Do you want to err about His name, and “sin” about His names? Some people have been formed to immediately realize what’s wrong with changing the names of Who we worship. It changes Who we worship. Some people don’t take too well to being called something different by someone else. These are more likely to object to renaming Yâ-hwéh Yâhuwshúa`. But most people these days understand the concept of “identity theft”. The adversary has perpetrated massive amounts of identity theft, AND slander against Yâ-hwéh Yâhuwshúa`. And the degree of the deception is beyond the ability of most people to accept, so they go into denial. Traditional Christianity today has over 90% of its doctrines exchanged for satan’s information. So when a Christian today is happy and wants to pray and honor the Most High, sadly, all the credit and honor is being diverted to the most low, satan, because the terms being used are all about satan. Identity theft. What is The Difference Between Yâhuwshúa` and “Jesus” or “Yeshua”? Yâhuwshúa` is the only best way to transliterate and transcribe the true name of the Anointed One, whose name is easy to find in Hebrew. One doesn’t need to use supercomputers to find “bible codes” to find out what His name is. It is written in ZkharYâ´hu (“zechariah”) that one man’s name there was a portent of the name of the Branch. That man’s name was Yâhuwshúa` Bën-Yâhuwtsâthâ´q. Also, it is written in the Letter (Epistle) of Bar-Nâvíy (“Barnabas”) that Moshéh renamed his servant Howshë´`á “Yâhuwshua`” in order that Yisrâ’ë´l would listen to him. This KJV “Joshua” is actually the name Yâhuwshúa`, and that name’s spelling is the same. Further evidence that Yâhuwshúa` is the proper rendition of this name is finding that “Joshua” appears more than once in the KJV “New Testament” written as “Jesus”. This means that Yâhuwshúa`’s name is the one which went through the mill to become “Jesus”. This means that everywhere you might find “Jesus” written, it should be restored to Yâhuwshúa`, to be correct (“righteous”) and not in error (“sin”). You may have seen the name written in lexicons or Schofield reference notes as “Yehoshua”. Yâhuwshúa` gets altered by the jewish scribes to falsely read “yehowshua”/“yehoshua”. This they do in order to comply with a religious rule they have, to alter any name beginning in Yâhuw- to Yehow- in order to avoid saying the name of Yâ-hwéh, because the short form of the name Yâ-hwéh is Yâ´hu, which can appear in the beginning or at the end of names in Hebrew. But as you see with NetanYahuw, they don’t object to keep it intact at the end of a name. It is wrong to avoid saying His name. Scripture says we ought all to boastfully praise His name openly and publicly, and this is the meaning of Háleluw Yâ´hu! The name Yâhuwshúa`, when written in Hebrew, appears as Y-H-W-Sh-`. This name cannot spell “Yeshua” because “Yeshua” is written Y-Sh-`, and it does not contain the two extra letters. Moreover, there are several verses in scripture we have found to denounce a “Yeshua”, meaning that this false name “Yeshua” will be one name used for the impostor to come, commonly called the “antichrist”. But there is even much more evidence about “Jesus” being a name for this impostor to come, even the Greek spelling of the letters 666 sounds like "Jesus". Who is Yâ-hwéh? The Most High is Yâ-hwéh. He is both the Father AND the Son. The only One Who can completely contain the Father is the Son. The Son referred to the Father as His Own Greatness. To understand this better, consider the Father as the Greatness, the Power, the Honor, the Love, the Light, the Life, the Goodness of Yâ-hwéh, Which is illimitable, undefinable in any number of words, uncontainable in our minds, beyond our comprehension, and better than we could ever imagine. And consider the Son as His Image, His Being, His Néphesh (mistranslated as "soul"), His Servant, His Personhood in fact. To know more about "The Crafty Use of Synonyms" done by His adversary, to confuse our language, watch our video What is the Sun . The terms “father” and “son” are limited in the application to Him to refer to His relationship to His own Power, and one should not apply the biological aspects to this. This explanat ion is supported by all inspired scriptures, particularly when correctly translated. Not one contradicts it, unless mistranslated. Are You Sure Yâ-hwéh is The Correct Rendering of His Name? People outside Him have seen the Hebrew transcription of this name Yâ-hwéh as YHWH and not wanting to pronounce it, named that transcription tetragrammaton in Greek, barbelo in Aramaic, when scripture says in Chanówkh to not abbreviate His names. Other people see YHWH and, not knowing Hebrew linguistics, put in the wrong vowels. To read an in-depth study about the true linguistics, please read here . The satanic scribes wrote in the wrong vowels into YHWH in their altered scriptures, to correspond with their false tradition to say, “adonay elohim” (my sovereign the daemon ones) and produced “yehowah” which evolved to “Jehovah”. But this itself has an evil meaning in Hebrew which identifies satan. What is the importance of saying Yâhuwshúa` is Yâ-hwéh? Romans 10: 9-10 makes clear that this is the Good Saying, which one must profess with one’s mouth in order to be saved. It is not enough to believe in one’s heart that the Power raised Him from the dead, that justifies one, and this surely is important, but to be saved, one must profess Yâhuwshúa` is Yâ-hwéh to be saved. Surely most Christians believe enough to be justified, but these do not profess His names to be saved. And to say this saving testimony correctly, one must have both names correct. Else one is saying someone else is Yâ-hwéh, or that Yâhuwshúa` is someone else. That won’t work. Below there is an audio showing you how to properly pronounce His names, because the names are a call, a sound, which if spoken wrong, does not call Him. Listen to this and try to imitate what you hear, and see why we spelled it “Yâhuwshúa` is Yâ-hwéh”. TO LEARN TO CALL ON HIS TRUE NAMES, LISTEN TO THE SAVING TESTIMONY The Saving Testimony Brothers in Yâhuwshúa` 00:00 Y âhuwshúa` is Yâ-hwéh: Accept NO Substitutes!

We are the first to expose that the "lion of Judah" is not our savior. If you love our Savior, read our findings to stop worshiping satan. THE LIE : THE LION OF JUDAH The lion Discrepancies in Scriptures Mark Twain, a freemason satanist (deceiver) storyteller, said it is easier to deceive someone than persuade them they’ve been deceived. Unless Yâ-hwéh Yâhuwshúa` favors you to believe His Truth, the facts contradicting common beliefs included in this brief page may also be too difficult for you to accept and believe. Since most of those who are deceived about Him, Who He is, will not change their mind until they actually do see Him manifested for themselves, the confusion about the lion, which is clarified on this webpage, may help prepare those chosen to accept His Garment of Light Which gives understanding. Here we will expose several deceptions about lions, disproving some of the lies the establishment teaches against our Sovereign Yâhuwshúa`. Remember, all lies come from the father of lies, the adversary (satan). We encourage you to also look further into this subject and to consider the information provided here as guided by Yâhuwshúa`, and compare it with your own findings. Does the lion Become the Lamb? Nowhere in inspired scriptures, or even altered ones, about Yâhuwshúa` does it state that the Lamb became the lion. Zero scriptures are vetting any process of the lion becoming the Lamb. Nonetheless, lion-loving satanists have led many to arrive at that foul conclusion. 36 lion mentions are evil in the KJV. How could this be the Lamb, our Savior? Many have been misled this way to mistakenly worship sâțâ´n because his Establishment’s Revelation 5: 5 alone contains a deceitful and misleading mistranslation. Though 1st Century believers were well aware of the Truth, most Christians do still remember that the lions in their scriptures represent evil with this verse: "Be Sober, be vigilant because your adversary, the devil, as a roaring lion , walketh about, seeking whom he may devour." – 1 Peter 5: 8 (KJV) Typically, when people recall the "lion and the Lamb," they are taking Yshá’Yâhuw ("Isaiah") 11:6 out of context due to its mistranslation in the KJV, mostly due to abbreviation by the scribes' shorthand coding: 6 (AV) The wolf also shall dwell with the lamb, and the leopard shall lie down with the kid; and the calf and the young lion and the fatling together; and a little child shall lead them. Here is Yshá`Yâhuw (“Isaiah”) 11:6 properly LXX- decoded: “ When one overcoming the demon ( yisrâ’ë´l ) of Me shall be fed with a wolf accompanying the nobody of yisrâ’ë´l of the Lamb (m. ) of yisrâ’ë´l, then of Me , a panther shall repose together with a young male goat of yisrâ’ë´l , and a little calf (n.) of yisrâ’ë´l , and a bull (m.) of yisrâ’ë´l – though the lion (m.) [were] dictating at the same time – they shall be fed of One overcoming the demon ( yisrâ’ë´l ) , when a little Child [ be ] Who of Me shall guide the same ones (m.) [ being ] the Son of yisrâ’ë´l , ” – Yshá`Yâhuw 11:6 Yshá`Yâhuw predicted, about the end times, that when Yâhuwshúa`’s true yisrâ’ë´l will be being fed by a predator wolf accompanying the adversary, then the various spiritual species of yisrâ’ë´l will not be at war with each other, although the lion will be still dictating, when they shall be fed by the 144,000 guided by our Savior. It is apparent that the lion is the adversary who will be ignored to prefer Yâhuwshúa`. It is a time when the adversary will not win the information war. Yshá`Yâhuw 65: 25 also mentions a lion : Per the KJV (altered by shorthand coding) Isa 65:25 (AV) T he wolf and the lamb shall feed together, and the lion shall eat straw like the bullock: and dust shall be the serpent’s meat. They shall not hurt nor destroy in all my holy mountain, saith the LORD. Here is Yshá`Yâhuw (“Isaiah”) 65:25 properly LXX- decoded: “ At that time, the wolves (m.) of one overcoming the demon ( yisrâ’ë´l ) [ ~underneath ] , and the lambs (m.) [ ~144K above ] shall be fed, at the same time dictating of One overcoming the demon ( yisrâ’ë´l ) , though the lion [ ~Yehuwthâ´h ] , like the ox of Me , shall eat the chaff , but the serpent , the Yâ-hwéh [ being ] the Land in Truth , as [ being ] the Bread/Food which [ is ] of you (sing.) , they [ ~the lion and the serpent ] shall not harm , not even with the father of the sovereign (’ avadówn ) , lest they should do injury upon the one overcoming the demon ( yisrâ’ë´l ) outside [ ~widow underneath ] that [ is ] not of the ones (n./m.) belonging to the transferring mountain [~middle], not of the ones (n./m.) belonging to the Pure-One (n.) of Me , ” dictates of Me Yâ-hwéh Yâhuwshúa`.” This is a prediction of Yâhuwshúa`’s crucifixion, feeding all the species of yisrâ’ë´l, but the adversary lion only feeding on the empty husk left behind. Yet this prediction also was mentioned as relating to an event that happened when Yâhuwshúa` was two years old, which foreshadows this by natural animals also having no animosity against one another because of Him. And both these reflect Yshá`Yâhuw’s prediction, which came to pass, as documented in the book of the 'Birth of the Blessed Miryâ´m' and 'The Infancy of the Savior,' written in Hebrew by MattithYâ´huw, which was translated into Latin by Jerome, and accused by the satanists as “The Gospel of Pseudo-Matthew,” which we will restore the names/terms therein to accuracy; for the establishment rendition, please see the link. “Now the day before this was done Yâhuwçë´ph was warned in his sleep by the Envoy of Yâ-hwéh Yâhuwshúa`, Who said to him: “ Take Miryâ´m and the Child, and go into Mitsráyim (“Egypt”) by the way of the desert .” And Yâhuwçë´ph went according to the saying of the Envoy. [7] CHAP. 18.--And having come to a certain cave, and wishing to rest in it, the blessed [8] Miryâ´m dismounted from her beast, and sat down with the child Yâhuwshúa` in her bosom. And there were with Yâhuwçë´ph three boys, and with Miryâ´m a girl, going on the journey along with them. And, lo, suddenly there came forth from the cave many dragons [~Greek term for “large serpent”, or “dinosaur”] ; and when the children saw them, they cried out in great terror. Then Yâhuwshúa` went down from the bosom of His mother, and stood on His feet before the dragons; and they adored Yâhuwshúa`, and thereafter retired. Then was fulfilled that which was said by Dâwíth the prophet, saying: Praise Yâ-hwéh Yâhuwshúa` from the earth, ye dragons; ye dragons, and all ye deeps [9] And the young Child Yâhuwshúa`, walking before them, commanded them to hurt no man. But Miryâ´m and Yâhuwçë´ph were very much afraid lest the Child should be hurt by the dragons. And Yâhuwshúa` said to them: “ Do not be afraid, and do not consider Me to be a little Child; for I am and always have been perfect [~also meaning mature/complete] ; and all the beasts of the forest must needs be tame before Me. ” CHAP. 19.--Lions and panthers adored Him likewise, and accompanied them in the desert. Wherever Yâhuwçë´ph and the blessed Miryâ´m went, they went before them showing them the way, and bowing their heads; and showing their submission by wagging their tails, they adored Him with great reverence. Now at first, when Miryâ´m saw the lions and the panthers, and various kinds of wild beasts, coming about them, she was very much afraid. But the infant Yâhuwshúa` looked into her face with a joyful countenance, and said: “ Be not afraid, mother; for they come not to do thee harm, but they make haste to serve both thee and Me. ” With these words He drove all fear from her heart. And the lions kept walking with them, and with the oxen, and the asses, and the beasts of burden which carried their baggage, and did not hurt a single one of them, though they kept beside them; but they were tame among the sheep and the rams which they had brought with them from Judaea, and which they had with them. They walked among wolves, and feared nothing; and no one of them was hurt by another. Then was fulfilled that which was spoken by the prophet: “ Wolves shall feed with lambs; the lion and the ox shall eat straw together. ” [10] There were together two oxen drawing a wagon with provision for the journey, and the lions directed them in their path.” - http://www.pseudepigrapha.com/LostBooks/infancymatt.htm Compare: “ the wolves (m.) of one overcoming the demon ( yisrâ’ë´l ) [ ~underneath ] , and the lambs (m.) [ ~144K above ] shall be fed, at the same time dictating of One overcoming the demon ( yisrâ’ë´l ) , though the lion [ ~Yehuwthâ´h ] , like the ox of Me , shall eat the chaff, ” Yshá’Yâhuw predicted events that would occur before Yâhuwshúa` was born, yet the complete fulfillment of the original happened when He was crucified. Yet notice: He fulfilled the material abbreviated version satan altered, also. This was when Yâhuwshúa` was leaving for "Egypt" to avoid persecution, all these wild beasts followed with the group behind Yâhuwshúa` into Egypt, and the lions were one kind among them, representing the first-mentioned type of the four spiritual animals of yisrâ’ë´l; and this was a spiritual sign; His leading all was the royal order of precedence, as no one outranks Yâhuwshúa`, so notice the passage says in many ways (in bold type) that all of the beasts walked with the group, behind Him. But notice that the last sentence shows a contradicting alteration: "the lions directed them in their path.” We believe this to have said “protected” because the same path had robbers along the way, per other scriptures. However, notice that if it only applied to the oxen, the lions directing the oxen does go with the order of the animals in the book of Disclosure (Revelation). But alterations like this " d̶i̶r̶e̶c̶t̶e̶d " mislead many people to believe the 'lion is the Lamb', and satanist lion-worshipper scribes are the source of this idea. The most famous alteration contributing to this is their mistranslation of Revelation 5:5 , but we will prove how scholars manipulated that scripture verse to favor the lion, not the Lamb. Even rebels and thugs believe the lion became the victor over the Lamb, branding this mistake in their bodies as tattoos. You're welcome to do an online search under images for "Revelation 5:5 tattoos" to see what we mean and look at the many despicable images of a lion eating the Lamb, lion over the Lamb, lion ruling over the Lamb, lion overcoming the Lamb, etc. No matter which, the original error of mistaking, even preferring the adversary lion for our Savior, the Lamb, threatens our Exemption because Passover means Exemption, and our Savior Yâhuwshúa` is our Passover Lamb, our Exemption. The satanists reject that Exemption. The lion Overcame, not the Lamb? The confusion is large among Christians because they are correctly taught to reckon all scriptures to be inspired and dependable, yet they are handed an undependable translation of a 66-book manuscript altered by scribal shorthand. The damage is less when the scripture still retains true meaning, so all scriptures, even in their establishment one (KJV), describe the Lamb as victorious in spite of having been slaughtered, for instance: Re 17:14 These shall make war with the Lamb , and the Lamb shall overcome them : for he is Lord of lords, and King of kings: and they that are with him are called, and chosen, and faithful. Although this verse says something very different when restored, it nonetheless contains this: …The Lamb of Me , He shall win over the same ones (m.) … And knowing this to be true, how can Revelation 5: 5 be true as misrepresented by this world’s establishment “bible”? It reads: 5 (AV) And one of the elders saith unto me, Weep not: behold, the Lion of the tribe of Juda, the Root of David, hath prevailed to open the book, and to loose the seven seals thereof. Notice the KJV doesn’t even allege that the lion prevailed over the Lamb, only to open the book. But they capitalized “Lion”, something they did not do for the 1 Peter mention of the same lion being the adversary, because they identify this lion as our Savior! It says that one of the ones of Yâ-hwéh, of the elders, says, using pronouns for (subjects we identify), that: (the Lamb) Who conquered of Me is He Who has NO regard for the lion without regard for non-satanist middle yisrâ’ë´l, who are being (the impostor) who is NOT of the (spiritual) tribe of the Profession of Yâ-hwéh, being the heart (f.). She (the false heart not being the true profession of Yâ-hwéh), which is not the Root of Dâwíth , the worker of Goodness , is to open , in the middle not belonging to the ones (144K), the Scroll (The Living Scroll of the Living) of one overcoming the demon (yisrâ’ë´l) , even the ones (f.) (middle sister) not being The Fullness (f.) , (the impostor heart) being the seals of the same One (n.) (living Scroll) of the Son of yisrâ’ë´l .” But what is this “heart” that opens the living Scroll and to loose the seals? The KJV, though omitting “heart”, said it was the lion . That much is true, the lion is the false heart, the profession of the lion as being ‘Yâ-hwéh’, which the satanists teaching it to the un-full non-satanist middle sister do, to open their Scroll. But what is that “book” (scroll)? Other scriptures (The Glad Tidings of the Truth) explain that this scroll (“book”) nailed on the cross/tree of the non-satanist middle yisrâ’ë´l Christians, to claim them, is the Living Scroll of the Living , an emanation of the Son, and contains His names, and is His claim posted on them. What is this claim of ownership? Their spiritual constitution – the way they were made – to reject the mighty one of lucifer/aaron (light-carrier), once they manage to positively identify him. But the adversary, the lion , seeking to prevent them from reading it/realizing it, has sealed shut this Scroll with seven unclean seals of his own making. But in trying to unfurl their worship for the adversary impostor, “the foot”, his satanists infiltrating Christianity, they remove these unclean seals. This impostor lion, a false profession of Yâ-hwéh, is the false heart . And this false heart he is calling “Judeo-Christianity” is what is to take off those unclean seven seals off from that Living Scroll posted on non-satanist middle yisrâ’ë´l not belonging to the ones (the 144K). But in their efforts to transfer the middle non-satanists to worship their impostor lion using the false heart, when the coming one comes riding the bully-clouds (Nephilim) of his tempest (STORM) with his satanists to murder his opponents, although Christians have been told of a “Second Coming of Jesus”, the reality of the middle’s positive identification of that ‘lion of Judah’ calling himself “Jesus”, that “lion of Judah”, being satan, clashes with the non-satanist middle Christians’ very composition: they are non -satanists and have no regard for the mighty one of lucifer/aaron… whenever they manage to realize it is him. This is in their design and the “Plan” they are told to trust; their conversion to satanism failed there by degrees: their error/mistake ends, and they begin to seek the Most High elsewhere outside the lion. Thus, the Living Scroll did stake His claim. But the lion was not who conquered nor prevailed, nor is the lion Who is from the tribe of the Profession of Yâ-hwéh, though his false religion posing as our Savior does open his own unclean seals on their Living Scroll. How did the lion-worshipping satanist liars make their mistranslation of OUR scriptures be so far from the truth? Do not interpret that as a sign of weakness of the Most High, because this was worked into His plan, and He did inform us of it in many scriptures. Remember the masses, He talked to in parables because at that time, they could not handle the Truth of higher knowledge our Savior Yâhuwshúa` spoke to His 12 pupils (which included Wisdom, Miryâ´m the Migdâlâ´h, not Yehuwth â´h “Judas”). Also, ever since then, and since earlier too, the masses of the middle were given a spiritually dumbed-down scripture they could handle by the satanists, because by those unclean seals, they are sealed off from His names. By “dumbed-down,” we mean not containing the higher knowledge (gnosis) He shared with the 12 pupils. But the motivation of the satanists was greed for power, to keep them from learning His dual-names Yâ-hwéh Yâhuwshúa` and thus keep them from overcoming their god, the adversary. Even the adversary’s greed to get worshipped was used to open those seals. Here we show you how this was done in Revelation (Disclosure) 5: 5. The satanic scribal shorthand coding omitted the words in blue. Read the black bold words without the blue words, and you will see it matches what is found in the KJV, although they reorganized it, and reduced ‘conquered’ to ‘prevailed’: “Who conquered of Me [is] He Who [is] without regard for the lion [ ~sâţâ´n ] without regard for he who [is] originating from he who “I shall cause to exist of yisrâ’ë´l” , [ ~middle ] [being] the one ( n .) [ ~Yehuwthâ´h impostor ] not of the tribe (f.) of Yâhuwthâ´h (the Profession of Yâ-hwéh) [being] the heart (f.) …” KJV - “ the Lion of the tribe of Juda, the Root of David, hath prevailed… ” But when you read the restored verse with the words in blue , you will see what it originally said. Translation issues were exploited by the satanists - The establishment "bible" Post-Advent scriptures (New Testament) were translated from Koine Greek. Koine Greek is an inflected language that uses parsing to modify words and express grammatical categories such as aspect, tense, case, voice, number, gender, person, and mood. In Greek mythology and commercial sneakers, you are probably already familiar with the Greek word “Nike,” associated with flight, speed, and victory. A form of this word is used in "Revelation" 5:5, and He/Who conquered/prevailed is correctly translated. But Who/who did it? Shouldn’t it be obvious that it is the Lamb Who overcame? Since they lied and made it the lying lion , those believing the satanist-establishment’s KJV to be infallible were taken in again, Mark Twain style, and instead of correcting it, reconcile the conquering Lamb with the impostor lion to ERR, to say ‘they are the same One.’ How can one expect scripture meanings to stay intact if all those blue words are omitted? By failing to correctly identify Who overcame, due to the mistake being these important blue omitted words , when restored, the Subject of “Who conquered” is identified by “He Who is without regard for the lion.” It becomes “He Who is… the lion” without the blue words . When the omission is restored, “Who conquered” refers to the Lamb, the Most High Yâ-hwéh Yâhuwshúa`, our Savior. But the omission caused the misidentification of the Subject of the statement, the Lamb, to be mistaken for the lion instead. So accurately translating scripture missing 2/3 of its words cannot hope to retain its original meaning 100% of the time. Thus, by this one altered verse, did the adversary loser lion manage to persuade legions of gullible non-satanists for thousands of years, to errantly believe the lion must be the Lamb since they believed the lion overcame … The parsing form of this word, “ hath prevailed ” (overcame) in Revelation is: ἐνίκησεν (enikhēsen) A conjugation of Strong's word# 3528 νικάω (nikáō) – victor We share an example of this word's parsing from the Griesbach 1796 2nd Edition Translation and the Gri-05 Griesbach 1805 Manual Edition : The parsing (verb indicative aorist active 3rd person singular ) for νικάω in "Revelation 5:5" contains the pronoun 'He ,' being part of the word, and if the Greek with its omissions would have been written out, literally in the English establishment translations, it would have appeared as: “Who conquered … [is] he who [is] … the lion [ ~sâţâ´n ] … [is] He Who [is] originating from … ̶o̶f̶ ̶t̶h̶e̶ ̶o̶n̶e̶ ̶(̶f̶.) [ ~routinely omitted by the establishment ] … of the tribe (f.) of Yâhuwthâ´h (the Profession of Yâ-hwéh) …” Revelation 5: 5 (BYZClassic) … και <2532> {CONJ } εις <1520> {A-NSM } εκ <1537> {PREP } των <3588> {T-GPM } πρεσβυτερων <4245> {A-GPM } λεγει <3004> (5719) {V-PAI-3S } μοι <3427> {P-1DS } μη <3361> {PRT-N } κλαιε <2799> (5720) {V-PAM-2S } ιδου <2400> (5628) {V-2AAM-2S } ε νικησ εν <3528 > (5 656) {V-AAI-3S } ο <3588> {T-NSM } λεων <3023> {N-NSM } ο <3588> {T-NSM } εκ <1537> {PREP } της <3588> { T-GSF } φυλης <5443> {N-GSF } ιουδα <2448> {N-GSM } η <3588> {T-NSF } ριζα <4491> {N-NSF } δαυιδ <1138> {N-PRI } ανοιξαι <455> (5658) {V-AAN } το <3588> {T-ASN } βιβλιον <975> {N-ASN } και <2532> {CONJ } τας <3588> {T-APF } επτα <2033> {A-NUI } σφραγιδας <4973> {N-APF } αυτου <846> {P-GSN } Textus receptus (usado por R-V) Apo.5:5 (IGNT) και <2532> {AND } εις <1520> {ONE } εκ <1537> {OF } των <3588> {THE } πρεσβυτερων <4245> {ELDERS } λεγει <3004> (5719) {SAYS } μοι <3427> {TO ME, } μη <3361> κλαιε <2799> (5720) {DO NOT WEEP. } ιδου <2400> (5628) {BEHOLD, } ενικησεν <3528> (5656) {OVERCAME  } ο <3588> {THE} λεων <3023> {LION } ο <3588> {WHICH] ων <5607> (5752) {IS } εκ <1537> {OF} της <3588> {THE } φυλης <5443> {TRIBE} ιουδα <2448> {OF JUDAH,} η <3588> {THE } ριζα <4491> {ROOT } δαβιδ <1138> {OF DAVID, [SO AS] } ανοιξαι <455> (5658) {TO OPEN } το <3588> {THE } βιβλιον <975> {BOOK, } και <2532> {AND } λυσαι <3089> (5658) {TO LOOSE } τας <3588> {THE } επτα <2033> {SEVEN } σφραγιδας <4973> {SEALS } αυτου <846> {OF IT. } See above, below the English literal translation, the shorthand Greek manuscript copy of Revelation 5: 5, as-is, without the omissions restored. Feel free to compare them to see their accuracy. We use the Byzantine Classic manuscript which is superior in accuracy to that of the “Textus Receptus” used by the KJV. That “Textus Receptus” differs from the better Byzantine Classic later in that verse, adding the word “to loose”. Basically, the first “he who” (ο <3588> {T-NSM  }) would have been thought to be the lion, because that “he who” is in the nominative case (T-NSM  ) , making it the subject , and that would make the lion also be qualifying to be part of the spiritual tribe of Yâhuwthâ´h too, without the omitted negation of it. Yet the main culprit of the mistaken identity, or more the lionists’ identity theft , is this one omission in blue: “Who conquered … [is] He Who [is] without regard for the lion [ ~sâţâ´n ] … [is] He Who [is] originating from … o̶f̶ ̶t̶h̶e̶ ̶o̶n̶e̶ ̶(̶f̶.̶) [ ~routinely omitted by the establishment ] … of the tribe (f.) of Yâhuwth â´h (the Profession of Yâ-hwéh) … ” Because their translating an altered manuscript making the lion, sâţâ´n, appear to be the victor , it makes their audience reconcile that by suggesting he is also the Lamb . This is why they, the satanist establishment, have brought this mistranslated verse out to showcase it for their impostor, the adversary’s incarnation, ameliorating the evil lion and cleaning up his image. This way the impostor will, and has felt free to associate himself with the image of a lion. And one sees “the lion of Judah” about this impostor everywhere, not knowing this verse utterly contradicts this. In fact, satan is not included at all in all yisrâ’ë´l. But satan did not win the information war about his defeat by the Lamb on the cross resurrecting, as he could not similarly alter every other instance of the Lamb being our Savior, so instead of trying to beat Him, He tried instead to join Him by stealing His identity; this could have been prevented if the translators would not have been satanists. Because scholars had not yet figured out the satanists’ shorthand code to find those omissions, compounded by their unwillingness to stick to common sense that the Lamb prevailed and conquered, they neglected to correctly identify the Subject of Who conquered, even with the context, although because of this coding generally making Greek become nonsensical (“it’s all Greek to me” ) they have established their own method to always liberally translate their translations to force them to make sense. Greek is a complicated exact and precise language. It should not be handled that way. The reason the KJV was more accepted than others by the public was that they went to greater extremes of liberal translating to produce a scripture version that even seemed to be proper Shakespearean English. Therefore, they could have easily also liberally translated this on the side of truth. So, was this done knowingly ? In this case, see the consequences of their mistake, who benefits, and the allegiances of the establishment doing the translating, and you can know: it was done deliberately. And those middle non-satanists who knew the Lamb was the victor, did not stand up against the precedent made by the powerful establishment, continuing to make a victor also out of the lion loser . Although the word enikhēsen includes a pronoun in its meaning, they could have easily translated it liberally as they did the rest, to make the lion be an object of Who overcame by saying “Who conquered him, the lion…; without knowing the omission , but the context makes it clear. But here we speak hypothetically, about translators who may not have had the means to restore the omissions , what they should have done. But we are grateful for the increase in knowledge from Yâ-hwéh Yâhuwshúa`, Who made it possible for us to find the full restored meanings of this decoded verse, and all similarly coded scripture, to know that the Lamb is Who overcame the lion , and to know for certain just in time to utterly reject the lion lie, even some already got lion tattoos. There is a point of no return. Even the current lion -worshippers, if they are among His finite perfect number, will repent at the End and be rescued. "And one of the elders says to me, Do not weep: look! He has VICTOR-ed OVER (conquered) the lion, the One [the Lamb] being from the tribe of Yâhuwthâ´h, Who is the Root of Dâwíth, to open the scroll and to release the seven seals of it." This is Yâhuwshúa`, the first Yisrael. In English, this Hebrew word applies foremost to Yahuwshua, Who was the First to overcome the demon-lion power (Yisrael) and the ones who follow His order of Priesthood. Yet many inspired scriptures consistently prove that the Lamb is Yâhuwshúa` and that the lion is satan. The ' lion is of Judah' is not the Spiritual Tribe of Yâhuwthâ´h The omissions discussed above also mislead readers to think that lion was of the tribe of “Judah”, and we have shown the negation was omitted. So what is the tribe of “Judah”? Because this world’s definitions are not the Truth. Let us look deeper than what you can easily find online written by the sheepherders for their consumption, because there are dozens of false definitions being made because everyone wants to be this, and they find a way to claim it incorrectly without studying the term. Although "Judah" is found written everywhere the Jews have written it as “ Y_huwthâ´h ” (יְהוּדָה) but is really Yâhuwthâ´h (יָהוּדָה) in Hebrew. The original term/name is Yâhuwthâ´h , and it means the "Profession of Yâ-hwéh ." Even this correct definition of this term is not found anywhere we know of, because it comes from analyzing the context and history of how Lë`â´h named her son, in restored scripture, and who has done that? You may find what she said in 1 Moshéh in our FPS translation. Why has it been hidden? Look at who benefited from hiding it. It has been hidden by those who first had interest in hiding the importance of professing Him correctly, and by those who preferred their own definition of it as identifying themselves, and could not reconcile their censorship of professing Yâ-hwéh with their calling themselves this, so they hid the definition. First look at how the Jews have rewritten it, altering it, as “ Y_huwthâ´h ” (יְהוּדָה), instead of Yâhuwthâ´h (יָהוּדָה). The reason for the underscore (_) omitting the vowel â is that the vowel letter “shwa” they substituted there is defined as a “silence”, to censor out the name Yâhuw-, the short form of Yâ-hwéh. So if one censors out Yâ-hwéh out of this word, no more is it a profession of Yâ-hwéh. Then by default, it goes to His adversary. In the same exact way, they currently teach to insert silences as underscores in the place of vowels, in words referring to the Most High in the minds of followers of the religions they control, even if those words aren’t really His names at all. Yet they keep their censorship secret by transliterating the silence as an “e”, writing “ Yehudah ”, which more of you must have seen as a very frequent name among them and the name they call their tribal religion, but we, seeing what they actually write in Hebrew, we will transcribe it here exactly as we see it written by them, with the underscore. It is contributory and helpful also, to know that “Y_huwthâ´h” is the name satan gave himself , as the impostor to come to impersonate our Savior. In fact, the fall of mankind was because the adversary within the serpent told this term to the dirt-man ("Adam"), who switched to it, and causing-life ("Eve") was deceived to believe this lie. They had known that the Fruit on the Tree/cross is Yâhuwshúa`, Who is the true Profession of Yâ-hwéh (Yâhuwthâ´h). But this lie “y_huwthâ´h” was the rotten fruit they ingested instead – not an "apple" or any other material fruit. Before you look that up in your KJV’s Genesis, know that suffered from their scribal omission code too. Shouldn’t we be informed? Who benefited from our not knowing? The satanists who wanted to keep non-satanists under their authority. Y_huwthâ´h was also the name used by “Judas” (who turned in our Savior to the authorities of this world), and the same name used by Jews to call themselves, Judah – and is the personhood (incarnation) of sâțâ´n and his chosen tribe. The cause of the fall of mankind is the exact error that many believe in today, the error of thinking that the ‘ lion of Judah ’ is the Lamb. Identity theft. Y_huwthâ´h (“Judas”) even hung himself on a tree also, albeit with a rope, to falsely imitate our Savior Yâhuwshúa`, but the lion did not get the Anastasis – the Standing in the middle – and never will have Standing in the sight of the Most High. That Greek term is mistranslated as “resurrection”, which is simply material coming back to life in the same body. The adversary, whose incarnation was this Y_huwthâ´h (“Judas”) he announced while in the serpent, has come back to life though not in the same dirt-body, in a similar one, as his antichrist impostor incarnation. Though reincarnation is not resurrection, it is the way satan alleges eternal life, so he has also made a cross-like image to represent that, the Ankh: the combination of a womb and the male organ. Identity theft; the shallow fall for it. Are there Royal lions ? The royals of the Most High are spiritually winged-creatures, not lions, and are His 144,000 children, who have acknowledged Him by His dual-names. But this is hardly ever heard, if at all. Whenever these, the royalty is mentioned in scripture, they translated it as the alternate translation: “kingdom”. But when the world hears of the “royals” of this world, who are instead determined by bloodlines and DNA material ancestry, their entire context is filled with lions, everywhere, even in their architecture. Why? Because they serve the lion, and thus they needed to clean up the lion’s bad image as you saw above. Didn’t you ever wonder why there are lions, not the Lamb, in the British royals' heraldry? The royals of this world are spiritual reptiles claiming to be the continuation of the bloodline of the kings of "Judah," (taking a detour through Teatifi) using mocking Lions in their heraldry because their self-serving KJV "Genesis" 49 customized mistranslation also makes Judah be lions. Bloodlines of material carnal ancestry are the methods of the adversary, not the Most High, but ev en currently, the British royal bloodline is known to be extremely corrupted and disqualifying, in order to introduce the adversary’s antichrist incarnation as the one they will cede to, by design and even prediction in their scripture. Guess who is the lion in this crest? answer The Winged-Creatures "Phoenixes" vs the lions (aryans) First let us disclaim any racial implications of this, although it is known that the adversary has a preference for the blond blue-eyed look for himself, thinking to look impressive. The four spiritual animals (living-creatures KJV) of yisrâ’ë´l are, in order of mention, are also in order of their descent into the darkness: 1 - lionlike (aryans) – The satanists, the elite of this world 2 - catlike (beast of burden, Christians) 3 - dirt-manlike (heathens) 4 - winged-creatures 'eaglelike' – the children of the Most High, to be disclosed (in sh’ówl), the chosen 144,000 All four are of one overcoming the demon (yisrâ’ë´l), and they are being returned up, restored to the Light in the reverse order. Therefore, the first will be last, and the last will be first . Is the lion our Savior? The following video presentation is dedicated to the middle Christian sister. Take note that even in non-decoded scriptures verses, the Lamb, Yâhuwshúa`, is our Savior, not the lion . Yâhuwshúa` our true Savior, is identified to be the Lamb . Our “Passover” Lamb, our Exemption from death. All who accept Him pertaining to Him either were Redeemed, or will be Ransomed from death, not merely the death of these temporary dirt bodies. So He was slaughtered yet He lives, and is putting into effect all the Work He did. And all those refusing the Lamb, the satanists, do not get that Exemption, they die at the end, and are rescued from death. And by His Work He overcame the lion adversary who had swallowed us all, but was overcome by the Lamb. But what is the lion ? We have identified him as the adversary, but little is taught about the horrific nature of this villain, to accommodate the establishment’s equating the lion to the Lamb. In all inspired scriptures, satan, the hideous lion, is the one who beats and harms us; the lion is the tyrant, the adversary, and the king of this material world. It is also written that a collection of lamentations was dedicated to our Yâ-hwéh, the Father of the Lights, by one of His spiritual emanations which descended into this darkness due to being deceived by the lion beast. Her recorded words, are known as the "Psalms," and were done in her tears of repentance. The accuser (diabolous in Greek, from which comes “devil”) being the one that goes by many names because he was not named at all by our Father, being the spawn of shame (yaldabaoth); an abandoned, aborted fetus who was not fathered nor consented to by Yâ-hwéh Yâhuwshúa`. In order to come to exist of one overcoming the demon, yisrâ’ë´l, the ones being restored to Yâ-hwéh Yâhuwshúa`, happens when He calls one by the name He has given to them, then these in turn will acknowledge Him in return and come into existence (everlasting life). But the fact that the adversary is illegitimate, a bastard (mamzër), means the its time remaining is limited. So it has thus taken many names, and one of these many titles the lion goes by is gâd-ariy’ë´l ("gadariel"). Gâd ("god") means the same as a daemon in Greek, fortune-distributor, and is the specific name of an idol worshipped by Bâvél. We will analyze it below. God + ariel = Gadariel We just said above that Gâd (“God”) means the same as daemon in Greek: fortune-distributor, and is the specific name of an idol worshipped by Bâvél. But your establishment “Holy Bible” is full of it, as referring to the Most High, where would you go to find verification of this? You have to go to the Hebrew scriptures to find it, and check the LXX Septuagint translation of the earlier original, as restored, to find what it truly said. Here: Yshá`Yâhuw (“Isaiah”) 65:11 – Restored per morphologically analyzed Septuagint: “ However, ye of Yâ-hwéh not the ones, are the ones (m.) deserting Me within, to send Me away of yisrâ’ë´l, and the ones (m.) having neglected belonging to the ones not being the transferring mountain belonging to the ones (m. ) not being pure of Me, though of one overcoming the demon ( yisrâ’ë´l ) . The ones (m.) preparing the strength, not of the ones (m.) , are pertaining to the “ God ” (גַּד (daimoni) Fortune-distributor) 20 [ ~ ‘twin tens’/ ‘twin riches’ ] to adhere to a food-menu of yisrâ’ë´l, also the ones (m.) supplying the one (f.) [ ~sister ] not with the fortune (f.) , being the poured-out drink [ ~libation ] ” But the reason we brought this verse here is to point out that the satanists are pertaining to “God” (Fortune-distributor) in their worship, and while enjoying the fortune, and handing over the middle sister to be poured out as a drink offering though not supplying them the fortune. “God” means demon, and in LXX it has daimoni there. So satanists know who they are talking about when they say “God” though Christians are mistakenly saying the same term while pertaining to the Most High in their minds. Ask a satanist freemason and he’ll tell you “God” is the letter “G” shown on the Masonic symbol, to enjoy the approval of the deceived Christians. Depending on their audience they will also allege that G letter means "great architect," "geometry," and also "god," all still pointing to satan. But we know definitively, that is short for “Gadariel”, because that G is interchangeable with a lion’s head. Why would this mean it’s “Gadariel”? We explain: "That same instant I stood up, I saw a great angel before me; his hair was spread out like a lioness. His teeth were outside of his mouth like a bear. His hair was spread out like a women's. His body was like a serpent's when he wished to swallow me. And when I saw him, I was afraid." – (Apocryphal) TsphanYâ´hu 6:8 As seen in the quoted restored reference Yshá`Yâhuw 65: 11, the fortune-distributor, “God”, being worshipped by those about to pour out the middle sister as a libation, is the adversary, so he, satan, actually does get called "God”. This is the first part of “Gadariel”, and ariy’ë´l ("Ariel") means "lion of the demonic-power (’ël)” in `Ivríyth "Hebrew." It is found in Strong's Concordance Hebrew lexicon entry #739, and ’aríy being “lion” in #738. Therefore “Gadariel”, the 'G' in the satanic freemason symbol, means “Demon-lion of the demonic-power”. No wonder freemasons shush each other to not tell what that 'G' means, or the lion-head. What they worship is an embarrassment. Yshá`Yâhuw (“Isaiah”) 29:1-7 mentions ’ariy’ë´l, the lion of the demonic-power, as the part of the spiritual City of Yâ-hwéh Yâhuwshúa`, which erred the Beloved One, the Worker of Goodness, and fought. When the non-satanist middle is ‘being’ the impostor, having his false heart, they are being this one, ’ariy’ë´l, and this helps explain this passage in scriptures. It is about the Christians and non-satanist middle, and what is to happen with the ones above and the satanists underneath. It is only understood correctly when restored. This passage is amazing and pertinent and we strongly recommend reading it as restored, from FPS, downloadable from this website. However, to hide this passage and its meanings from everybody, the adversary made material analogues in the geographical area of his analogue Yisrâ’ë´l, for everything scripture mentions, to create historical events in our distant past, so that people who see the altered scriptures would associate it with ancient historical events instead of our future. Reading any worldly scholar’s interpretation of this passage will tell you of Moab being the biological grandson of Lot, fathered by his mother’s own biological father Lot, explaining the name Moab being “from his own father”, and Moab thus being a biological tribe of people in antiquity. So, they would call that Moab analogue, ’ariy’ë´l’s people, as if that prophecy is fulfilled completely and ignorable, problem solved, keep walking. Thus also, the name of the capital of Moab, Rabbath Moab, was also called Areopolis (lion city) , although ’ariy’ë´l’s city is currently satanist Jerusalem, and stands to try to recruit the transferring mountain of ‘Judeo-Christianity’. But in spiritual reality, as the Christian non-satanist middle yisrâ’ë´l sister has the inability to have regard for Yâ-hwéh Yâhuwshúa`, their Christianity also becomes the errant part of the City which currently is of the lion of the demonic-power, ’ariy’ë´l, sâţâ´n, until they might come to exist, acknowledging Yâ-hwéh Yâhuwshúa` after the selection/separation. More About Gadariel , Outside the Establishment's Canon Many have written about Gâd-’ariy’ë´l ("Gadariel"), giving further clues they knew it was another title for sâţâ´n: The higher-knowledge "gnostic" codices found in the Nag Hammadi Library say G'dariy'ë ´l is a "craftsman" ("lower creator"/"architect") – A "demiurge" means a craftsman. Not the Inventor of a new form but the imposer of pre-existing forms and formless materials. This is a reference to the adversary. The Hypostasis (Substance) of the Archons : In Not in His image , John Lash describes the maker of this material chaos by quoting the Berlin codex as "having a lion-like [body] with the head of a drakona, a reptile." “…When foolish Wisdom desired to cause the thing that had no spirit to be formed into a likeness and to rule over matter and over all her forces, there appeared for the first time a ruler, out of the waters, lion-like in appearance, androgynous, having great authority within him, and ignorant of whence he had come into being." Heinrich Cornelius Agrippa said, in his book Of Occult Philosophy, Book III (part 3) , "Ariel is the name of an angel, and is the same as the lion of god (fortune); sometimes also it is the name of an evil Demon, and of a City which is thence called Ariopolis, where the Idol Ariel was worshipped." Easton's Bible Dictionary defines Ariel as "the lion of God." Easton adds that Ariel is a "symbolic name for Jerusalem." ’ariy’ë´l is called both a prince who rules the waters and "earth's great lord" "A wielder of the fire of gold" - a lion-headed deity or demon with power over the Earth." Isn’t it sinister how the adversary also twisted the meaning of this lion to seem good? ’ël which means demonic-power became “God”, which is accepted by establishment Christianity as pertaining to the Most High. However, some misleading transliterations of Gâd-’ariy’ë´l appear in scripture translations and commentary: The blue letter bible lexicon says Gadreel, Gaderel (in Heb. גדר האל "gader ha-ël," literally "wall of God ") (or G'adri'el) – are detours away from the Truth, derived from "gader": to wall up or off, to build a wall - Pronunciation gä·dār' (Key) גָּדֵר It seems these desperately wanted to dissociate “God” from “Gadariel”, since the Strong’s Concordance’s Hebrew Lexicon exposed that term in their entries #1408/1409, to try to clean up the image of the adversary. Whenever anyone abandons Yâhuwshúa`, Who is Yâ-hwéh, to follow after the lion (the things of this world), the lion devours this person, and then he becomes part of the separated city of the lion of the demonic-power, ’ariy’ë´l . Believe in the Lamb , for He is Who overcame, and He is our Sovereign and our Savior Yâ-hwéh Yâhuwshúa`, so abandon the liar loser lion who He overcame. Are You Still Believing that the lion is the Lamb? back to top "I have come in my Father's name [ Yâ-hwéh Yâhuwshúa` ] , and you do not accept Me; but if someone else comes in his own name, you will accept him." - Yâhuwchânâ´n "John" 5:43

"The Way of Yâ-hwéh (Dérekh Yâ-hwéh)", is the original faith all of scripture speaks of, from the OT onward throughout the NT. THE WAY OF YÂ-HWÉH YÂHUWSHÚA` “Come, follow Me” - The Way of Yâ-hwéh Yâhuwshúa` The Way of Yâ-hwéh Yâhuwshúa’ is mentioned several times in properly translated scriptures and inspired extra-canonical scriptures. Yet there is very little understanding about The Way among the Christian teachings, and this is because their pastors do not have the Spirit of Truth nor an Ear to discern meanings beyond what Yâ-hwéh Yâhuwshúa’s` literally said that “He is the Way, the Truth and the Life.” Although Yâ-hwéh Yâhuwshúa` is indeed The Way, the Truth and the Life, one needs to expand more on His saying to receive more understanding about what Yâhuwshúa` meant. Before anything else, to understand Him, one has to first obtain His spirit of Truth by way of acknowledging that He is Yâ-hwéh Who is our Savior, Who took on a dirt-body form, dwelt among us, then was crucified as the slaughter Offering Ransom for us, yet rose from the medically-dead state three days later; this is Yâhuwshúa`, Who is Yâ-hwéh. If you believe He actually did this and that His names are really Yâ-hwéh Yâhuwshúa` and worth switching away from the false names circulating, then we may proceed. Yâhuwshúa` said, “Come, Follow Me,” Would You Like To Know Where He Was Leading His Followers to go First? Yâhuwshúa` led His followers to the Cross. Indeed, everyone who desires to have a Life in Yâ-hwéh Yâhuwshúa` will eventually be a persecuted believer – 2nd Letter to Timótheos 3:12. And therefore, If you believe in following the Life, death, and resurrection of Yâhuwshúa` of the Anointed One, you’re walking The Way of Yâ-hwéh Yâhuwshúa’, overcoming the struggles with this world by means of Him with the goal to return to our Land, our Home (before our fall) and leave this material world (and its temp creator) behind. These with Him within are now wearing His Resurrection and are unafraid and unashamed to strip off their filthy dirt-garment and trample them under our feet because these are His little Ones, who will see the Son of the Living One and not be afraid. In the meantime, they wear His Resurrection as His promise to them until the Sixth Seal after when their inner-Man gets revealed; this is the Life in Yâ-hwéh Yâhuwshúa`. Preferring Him Over Everything and Everyone is the First Commandment In MattithYâ´huw 19:21 Yâhuwshúa` tells a worldly (rich) man to give away his wealthy material possessions and to follow Him, to be made perfect. But because choosing to follow Yâhuwshúa`, the Cross or the Narrow Path, is a difficult thing for one who is not yet favored of Him, one such person cannot do this even if he thought of himself to be a strong man. Preferring Him over everything and everyone is the First Commandment. The true followers of The Way of Yâ-hwéh Yâhuwshúa’DO this when these acknowledge Yâ-hwéh Yâhuwshúa` by His names and esteem Him as being our TRUE husband; therefore, they do not place any carnal husband or wife over Him, if those reject Him, these are free to leave them. The true followers of the Way of Yâ-hwéh Yâhuwshúa’ also leave (biological) material fathers, mothers, brothers, children and anyone else who hates Him or opposes our preferring Him (our walk) to follow our Savior Yâhuwshúa`. The true followers of the Way of Yâ-hwéh Yâhuwshúa’ are openly witnesses for Yâ-hwéh Yâhuwshúa,` and only these can witness for Him because these are His living temple and are all spokesmen for Him; and this kind of walk, is the Way of Yâ-hwéh Yâhuwshúa’. Believers of The Way of Yâ-hwéh Yâhuwshúa` Believers of The Way of Yâ-hwéh Yâhuwshúa’ first sought forgiveness from Yâ-hwéh Yâhuwshúa` for following after His accuser (satan/ the ways of this world or wide path), to now walk the Narrow Path; this is why, before Yâhuwshúa` came, Yâhuwchânâ´n the Immerser came to till the Land to prepare it for the Seed of Life, meaning to immerse them in repentance (change of mind) before Yâ-hwéh, wherein they regretted their sins and changed their behavior and closed their ear to further suggestions to continue such behavior. But forgiveness from their sins came when they prayed to our Father by the name of Yâhuwshúa` and being immersed in His name (having His name on your mind always) functions as a repellent for evil spirits; this Word is the Truth (of Yâ-hwéh) and those who prefer the Word of the Way Yâ-hwéh Yâhuwshúa` follow Him wherever He goes. Are You One of His Chosen Ones? The many are called but few are chosen – by our Father – to believe in Yâ-hwéh Yâhuwshúa` by means of His true names and this is to worship Him in Truth. No Lie is useful to pertain to Him because all lies come from the adversary, the father of the Lie. The ones chosen to be unshakable, this life-time around, because we have had prior lives (nativities), we have died every day (a thousand year day) because we had forgotten His name, but now you have heard it, His true name, as it truly sounds from Him, so are you chosen to believe in Yâ-hwéh Yâhuwshúa` by name unshakeably? This webspace is where some of His spiritually winged-creatures have set up a table to feed newcomers the true Bread from heaven, Yâhuwshúa’s name; will you say "mân" ("manna" = what is it?) and leave Him because you desire different food? Understand that He is pure and won't accept a corrupt perversion of His name, so to be reckoned righteous in His sight you must switch to His true name. Then your true spiritual eyes, His vision-Source, will be opened and you will be able to see what is right and what is wrong, and walk with Him on His Way unshakeably, if you are chosen - "elect" - so don't delay any more if you are chosen! And make up your mind quickly because time is short, and you have to grow and get ready for His return! Are you chosen? A to be continued mission in this material chaos... For more information about The Way of Yâ-hwéh Yâhuwshúa` , please read our written scripture-researched study on The Truth about Marriage . To obtain your FREE copy of the FirstFruits.' Purified Scriptures (FPS) in MS Word (doc.) format click on the menu tab under 'Free Scriptures.' Back to Top We are follower s of The Way of Yâ-hwéh Yâhuwshúa ` , the Narrow Path, and by the supports of Wisdom, we only follow Yâhuwshúa`our Husband, Who said He is "the Truth, the Way, and the Life."

You have read how the eleven apostles were chosen in the Bible. Did you ever wonder how Judas was called? JUDAS NOT ONE OF THE TWELVE Common Christian teachings portray Judas as " having been called to be one of the twelve disciples, who somehow changed his mind from being a good pupil and betrayed our Savior. It is as if He made a mistake calling him, or did not know what was in him, to think that Judas was ever for Him. " These gravely mistaken ideas greatly mislead Christians, and this page will disprove each of these myths. Was Judas One of the Twelve Disciples? In our studies, we need to use accurate terms to communicate concepts better. We will explain those here because the adversary has deceived everyone using inaccurate terms, neologisms, and false definitions to thoroughly confuse people. Therefore, in our diction, we call Judas by the original name he went by, Yehuwdâ´h. How did Yehuwdâ´h evolve to Judas? First, the letter J in the name "Judas" is how the capital letter "I" was written to distinguish it from the small letter L, beginning in the 14th century, and it adopted a different sound by the French in the 16th century. Why did the translators use an "I" to transliterate the Y in Yehuwdâ´h? Because in Old English, the letter "J" and the letter "Y" shared their enunciation rules as in "yesterday" or "yellow," just like the Hebrew letter y (yud). After 1611 KJV Bible publishing, modern English accepted the shape and sound of the letter "J" as "jay" and no longer the "yuh" "Y" sound because it adopted a different sound by the French in the 16th century. The "I" got its shape letter in the 15th century as a contribution of the Spanish language, and it was only about 1600's when the letter "J" started appearing in print. This fact leads to the question, how can Yehuwdâ´h's name be "Judas" if the letter "J" did not exist before the 14th century? The same question goes for "Jesus, " an untrue rendition of Yâhuwshúa` 's name. Following the procedural rules to further discredit the use of the J in English versions of Hebrew names, some allege that there does not exist a Hebrew letter of the 22 with the same sound as the new letter "J." But this is not so; the ancient Hebrew's undageshed gimel (ğ) has the sound. However, it is not currently given a different sound in the "modern" Hebrew of the jews. But this letter, g (gimel), is not one ever thought of in the rendering of "Jesus" nor "Judas." Why are we only dealing with Hebrew , not Latin or Greek ? Because no matter how many languages scriptures were translated into, this happened in Judea, and the populace there, although overrun by foreigners speaking various languages, had not changed the language being spoken there from being Hebrew. To know from the "Bible" what language our Savior spoke, we look to the book of Deeds "Acts," one mention of what language Yâhuwshúa` spoke. When He stopped Shâ’úwl (Paulus) on the road to Damascus – it says He was speaking in the Hebrew language "Shâ’úwl, why do you persecute Me?" A myth is being spread among those trying to deny His name is in Hebrew, alleging that everyone spoke Greek. But a person's name does not change according to the native language of the caller. Would it be surprising to hear that Christopher Columbus was actually Cristoforo Colombo? Do you think he would have responded to "Christopher"? A name is a sound that invokes someone, and if altered, it does not. Although we need to know the proper name of Yâhuwshúa`, in this case, the reasons for knowing the name of "Judas Iscariot" is really Yehuwdâ´h, are other reasons. There is a lot of confusion generated around this name, and meticulous research is challenging since disinformation is abundant everywhere. The reason is that the name Yehuwdâ´h ("Judas") is also used by Jews for their religion ("Judaism"), race (Yehuwdath), and physical land (Judea) –which they define as keeping their strict genealogical standards. Yet Yehuwdâ´h, if one tries to analyze it linguistically, it is not an original Hebrew word. The actual transliteration is Y_huwdah (shwa = silence _), as though a name-censor is censoring its vowel. And that is because the inventor of this name Yehuwdâ´h is satan, who within the serpent, said it to the dirt-man as the name which would open his eyes, but it closed his spiritual eyes and caused the fall of mankind. What Could the Adversary be Censoring Out Within Y_huwdah? The actual, accurate Hebrew term is Yâ huwdâ´h, which means, "The Profession of Yâ-hwéh." Yâ´huw is the short form of the name Yâ-hwéh in Hebrew. Professing His name is forbidden by Jewish satanic traditions censoring His name, especially His dual names Yâ-hwéh Yâhuwshúa`. Therefore, it should not be surprising that the adversary would censor the Yâ´huw in Yâhuwdâ´h, with a Y_huwdah. Although this was originally the name of one of the 12 tribes from the 12 sons of Ya'aqóv, the meaning of the spiritual tribe matters, which is, that ones He calls, are being the profession of Yâ-hwéh! This is thus called the authentic tribe, according to the Glad Tidings of Phílippos. This "tribe" is not determined by race nor genealogy; it is spiritually defined. Therefore, there is an enormous difference between Yehuwdâ´h and Yâhuwdâ´h. The satanic establishment has sanitized everything about Yâhuwdâ´h. The amount of censoring was so severe that wherever Yâhuwdâ´h was mentioned, the opposing term "Yehuwdâ´h" and its current versions have replaced it. This has caused mass confusion, caused by misapplying the satanic term to identify the spiritual tribe and misapplying the satanic term and their definitions to our Savior's spiritual kin and followers. The written spelling difference we highlight here would not be written until the 17th century when vowel pointing was introduced into Hebrew, and only curious scholars still knew of the original term. The vast difference between the faiths and beliefs of Yâhuwdâ´h versus Yehuwdâ´h are diametrically opposed: Yâhuwdâ´h worshipping Yâ-hwéh Yâhuwshúa` the Most High, and Yehuwdâ´h by their own admission worshipping the adversary, being identified as an assembly (synagogue) of satan, according to our Savior. Yet both continued to coexist geographically not in shâlówm (only the satanists being violent) until the dispersion, first of Christian Yâhuwdâ´h, and later the Romans dispersed the satanist Yehuwdâ´h by war. Now consider, since Yehuwdâ´h is satan's profession of himself as the counterfeit Savior: Yehuwdâ´h is the name of "Judas." Yehuwdâ´h is the name of a racial tribalist religion worshipping satan since all these hate the Profession of Yâ-hwéh, Yâhuwshúa`, is it unreasonable to describe this racial tribalist religion as the followers of "Judas," Yehuwdâ´h? This suggests that Yehuwdâ´h is the same adversary incarnated, solidly documented in various inspired scriptures. But the fact is hidden by the satanic establishment, which is frequently too embarrassed about who they worship to admit it openly. Thus, they work and pay their laborers to mold public opinion against thinking that. The resulting common Christian teachings portray Yehuwdâ´h as " having been called to be one of the twelve disciples, who somehow changed his mind from being a good pupil and betrayed our Savior. As if our Savior made a mistake calling him, or did not know what was in him, to think that Yehuwdâ´h was ever for Him ". A subtle difference is found in their mistranslating paradidomi , the term scribes translated as " betray ." Paradidomi means literally to give over, as we say, "turn over," what an enemy infiltrator does, to "hand over" someone to the satanic authorities of this world. " Betraya l" does not mean the same thing. " Betrayal " implies a change of heart from formerly being an ally to becoming an enemy. Yehuwdâ´h, the personification of the adversary, never was an ally, and he even knew and said that Yâhuwshúa` knew everything he conspired. Another mistranslation they made is prodótes , "one giving forwards (into another's hands)" from Luke 6: 16, as " the traitor ," because a traitor also implies the existence of a time when Yehuwdâ´h, the adversary, was once good by nature. Decoded scriptures and codices agree that the adversary was evil from his beginning, never having been in the Light. The myths about him having ever fallen or been a "heavenly angel" result from satanic scribes' scripture alteration. Most significant mistaken idea: was Yehuwdâ´h called? What is The Calling? "The Call" is a command performed ONLY by Yâhuwshúa` to awaken and address a prototypal sleeper – being any person who may awaken to Knowledge and Salvation. The Call also refers to Yâhuwshúa`, Who is The Word of The Way ["logos"], being the Garment of the Savior; said to be "The Voice (Call) of the immeasurable thought." – Paraphrase of Shem , and "The Mindless person hears 'the call' but is ignorant of the Place to which he or she has been called." Authoritative Discourse . The called ones (or calling) occupy the place of those who rejoice at the Bridal Chamber, who are happy on account of the union of the Bridegroom and the Bride. The Place [Son] which the calling [called ones] will have is the aeon [eternal One (Twin)] of the images [copies], where the Logos [Word of the Way] has not yet joined with the Pleroma [Fulness] of one overcoming the demon (Yisrâ’ë´l) . " The Tripartite Tractate At the time when Yâhuwshúa` told each one, He called, "Come follow me," only those He called could answer Him, thereby leaving material things behind to follow Him. In your "Bibles," it is recorded that Yâhuwshúa` only called eleven this way to be His pupils, "disciples." A thorough check of your "Bibles" or any other inspired scriptures will show that Yehuwdâ´h ("Judas") was never called to be one of the twelve. Furthermore, the eleven called by Yâhuwshúa` answered by following Him . The Books of the Savior, known as "Pistis Sophia," explains that these eleven are like copies of the eternal, existing ones in the dimension of Light. Yâhuwshúa` did not call Yehuwdâ´h because this one is not an existing one and will never come to exist, meaning to become actually having become 'one overcoming the demon' (Yisrâ’ë´l). Just because only eleven were called at that time does not mean the walk-in intruder Yehuwdâ´h was the twelfth. The eleven pupils called by Yâhuwshúa` are twins to the eleven high priest positions in the eternal realms of Light. When each of these eleven (female néphesh) is paired with their corresponding (male) envoy twin, as we read in the Bridal Chamber explanation, these eleven pairs comprise the twenty-two elders in the dimension of the Light who sit on their thrones attending to Yâhuwshúa`. But we see twenty-four written in Disclosure (Revelation). Why? Intentionally, Yâhuwshúa` left out the calling of the last pupil, the twelfth one. The twelfth's male twin envoy (number twenty-three) made the initial Call (in Wisdom, Sophia) for the Savior to come down and rescue Her, and that twelfth one's personhood is Miryâ'm of Miğdâlâ´h, the twenty-fourth and the lost sheep. There are many reasons why Yâhuwshúa` permitted it to be this way. And this confused the other eleven pupils who had not understood this information until His resurrection when Yâhuwshúa` revealed it to them after the mistake of selecting a twelfth themselves – by lottery, as documented in Deeds (Acts). They were mistaken to not understand that the call is only done by Yâhuwshúa`. At the end of the Glad Tidings of Tâ’ówm, one of the objections voiced by the eleven against Miryâ'm was her being in a female physical body. There, and in the Books of the Savior, "Pistis Sophia," it is written that Yâhuwshúa` would 'turn Miryâ'm into a male.' How is this possible? Yâhuwshúa` will pair her néphesh (which are all female) with her male envoy Twin (GT of Tâ’ówm scripture), making Miryâ'm of Miğdâlâ´h a spiritually male pupil of the Sovereign like His other pupils-turned-disciples. This preference for spiritual gender also explains why the unpaired are called "sisters," even if physically male. It is interesting to note the spiritual symbolism in that Miryâ'm came from Miğdâlâ´h, a fishing village on the Sea of Galilee, close to where Yâhuwshúa` was raised. This explains the twelfth missing pupil (disciple). Its explanation is found nearly entirely outside the small collection of scriptures selected by the satanists to be included, contributes to the confusion and the deception to think of Yehuwdâ´h having been that one. But even those scriptures initially did say Yehuwdâ´h never was called. Still, the evidence was hidden, omitted by the scribal shorthand coding of all canonical scriptures, which changed the intended meaning to satanic meanings. The resulting abbreviated altered version made Yehuwdâ´h sometimes sound like one of the twelve, especially when loosely translated into English by satanist authorities. But the facts about Yehuwdâ´h, which are easily found in codices and decoded canonical scriptures, both of which are declared off-limits to Christians by their foolish shepherds, are that he was the incarnation of the adversary, who sought to find Him and kill Him. In the "Gospel of Judas," Yâhuwshúa called him the 13th demon and said Yehuwdâ´h's star misled him, as this one was paired with the adversary. Yâhuwshúa` is He Who is without regard for the demon light-carrier (the adversary), and throughout all scriptures, especially the "Gospel of Judas," it is clearly seen that Yâhuwshúa` treated Yehuwdâ´h with no regard for him. Yâhuwshúa` would simply walk away when Yehuwdâ´h asked questions about the future 'unshakeable generation' that would endanger us and help him, the adversary, locate us. The Satanist Establishment Spin-doctors Yehuwdâ´h Misleading misrendered scriptures and banned books helped the satanist establishment spin-doctor Yehuwdâ´h . Thanks to Yahuwshua.org, we include here decoded strictly literally translated canonical scriptures to compare with the misleading coded and liberally translated establishment ones. Note, the blue font denotes text the coding omitted, and other differences were altered by translators to smoothen it out for the KJV. Compare them, you will find the KJV utterly antithetical to the original decoded form (NOTE to the reader, please review FPS latest translation): KJV vs. Decoded : MattithYâ´huw 10: 4-5 KJV – Simon the Canaanite, and Judas Iscariot, who also betrayed him. These twelve Jesus sent forth, and commanded them, saying, Decoded – Shim`ówn the zealot of Yisrâ’ë´l , yet Yehuwthâ´h "a man of His city" (' Iysh-Qiryáthow) , [is] he, who [is] without regard for Yisrâ’ë´l , and the one (m.) giving over the same One [being] the Son [being] these ones, with the one (m./ n. ) not the twelve he sent forth, who [is] without regard for Yâhuwshúa`, the One (m.) transmitting the message to the same ones (m.) pertaining to the Son , the One (m.) dictating: KJV vs. Decoded: Yâhuwchânâ´n's Glad Tidings 6: 67-71 KJV – Then said Jesus unto the twelve, Will ye also go away? Then Simon Peter answered him, Lord, to whom shall we go? thou hast the words of eternal life. And we believe and are sure that thou art that Christ, the Son of the living God. Jesus answered them, Have not I chosen you twelve , and one of you is a devil ? He spake of Judas Iscariot the son of Simon: for he it was that should betray him, being one of the twelve. Decoded– Therefore, concerning it, he dictated of the [ ~counterfeit ] "Yâ-hwéh", he [ ~Yehuwthâ´h ] who [is] wit hout regard for Yâhuwshúa`, [being] the one (m.) not the twelve: " Do ye of the father of the sovereign (' avadówn ) not of Yisrâ’ë´l, also wish to withdraw? " Therefore, responded of Yâ-hwéh against the same one (m.) against the Son , Shim`ówn Këph: "Oh Yâ-hwéh Yâhuwshúa` , of all Yisrâ’ë´l , towards whom (m.) shall we go away? The sayings of the Life of the eternal ones You hold of Yisrâ’ë´l, and we, we have believed Yours of Yisrâ’ë´l , and we have acknowledged this One , that [is] You : You cause to exist (ta-hyéh) he who [is] without regard for the Anointed, who [is] without regard for the Son with regard for [being] the one s (m.) not of the mighty one of' aharón (light-carrier/lucifer), not [being] the one s (m.) of the One (m.) living!" Who responded to the same ones (m.), pertaining to the son | who [is] without regard for Yâhuwshúa`|: " Of you (sing.) , one which [is] not I – [ being ] ye with the one (m./ n .) , not the twelve I picked out of Yisrâ’ë´l – also originating from I shall cause to exist (' a-hyéh) [1] of Yisrâ’ë´l [ are ] of ye: among My Yisrâ’ë´l a slanderer [ ~diábolous ] he is." Moreover, dictating of Yâ-hwéh: not of The One (n./m .) [ is ] Yehuwthâ´h [2] Bën-Shim`ówn [ ~the leper, a Pharushíy ], " a man of His city " ( ' Iysh- Qiryáthow )[3] , for the reason that, of Yâ-hwéh, this One Sheep he was intending to give over [is ] the same One (m.) [being] the Son among My Yisrâ’ë´l , the One causing to exist (ta-hyéh ) from "I shall cause to exist (' a-hyéh) [4] of Yisrâ’ë´l ", of the ones (m.) not [of] the adversary (sâţâ´n): the twelve of Yisrâ’ë´l. Comparing the above, it is clear that the scribal coding and the liberal translating portray Yehuwdâ´h falsely as having been called or chosen as one of the twelve. This has also been the case in all other such passages. And this, compounded to the scantiness of the scripture canon collection, being reduced to 66 books by satanist "church fathers," excluded books with more dirt on Yehuwdâ´h, serving to inform those confined to these books much less. See the Narrative of Yâhuwçë´ph of Aramathea: … And they summoned Yehuwthâ´h "a man of His city" (' Iysh-Qiryáthow) , and spoke to him, for he was son of the brother [~Shim`ówn the leper, a Pharushíy ] of Qayë´phâ' the priest. He was not a pupil before the face of Yâhuwshúa`; but all the multitude of the Yehuwthím craftily supported him, that he might follow Yâhuwshúa`, not that he might be obedient to the works of the Power done by Him, nor that he might profess Him, but that he might give Him over to them, wishing to catch up some lying word of Him, giving him gifts for such 'brave', 'honest' conduct to the amount of a half a weight (shekel) (5.7g), of gold each day. And he did this for two years [ ~146.8 oz total ] with Yâhuwshúa`, as says one of His pupils called Yâhuwchânâ´n. …And Yehuwthâ´h, going into the "sanctuary" at the dawn of the fifth day (1/8) [MattithYâ´huw 26: 14 ], says to all the people: "What are ye willing to give to me, so I will give up to you the overthrower of the Law, and the plunderer of the predicators?" The Yehuwthím say to him: "If you will give Him up to us, we will give you thirty pieces of gold ." [ZkharYâ´hu 11: 12 ] And the people did not know that Yehuwthâ´h was speaking about Yâhuwshúa`, for many of them professed that He was the Son of the Power. And Yehuwthâ´h received the thirty pieces of gold. And the scripture which Cyril of Jerusalem received, which was cursed by the paid laborers to label as "PseudoCyril," its translation to English says: "Judas, then, listened to his wicked wife. He went to the chief priests and said to them: 'What are you willing to pay me that I deliver him to you? 83 For I know that you are seeking to kill him. You have not been able to do anything against him, but if you want, I am the man who will deliver him to you.' And they made an arrangement with him for 30 ̶s̶i̶l̶v̶e̶r̶ [gold] pieces." Reliably translated books describe the reward offered by the Yehuwdím (Jews) as being thirty pieces of gold , not silver. Throughout the adversary’s history, he loves material gold, the "seed of the demon of fire" in the Hindu religion. Why did the Yehuwdím (Jews) change the writing to silver whenever they could in scriptures? This would hide who Yehuwdâ´h was and help mitigate the image of extreme greed and evil, which characterizes the spiritual leader of the Yehuwdím (Jews). Modern Day Judas-Defenders Yâhuwshúa` calls Yehuwdâ´h the 13th demon, and the Yehuwdím (Jews) at National Geographic render it as "the 13th spirit" These followers of Yehuwdâ´h, the Yehuwdím (Jews), are strategically controlling the media sources of this world and the roles of the most accepted paid-worker scholars translating scriptures. This includes the National Geographic Society, who obtained the “Gospel of Judas" exclusively and fully endeavored to mitigate and remake Judas's image, brazenly mis translating several damning passages within it forbidding the release of the contents of this manuscript to prevent objective translations from being made. When one non-Jewish scholar called their attention to one such flagrant alteration, they issued a private apology, but their translation was not corrected. The “Gospel of Judas” contained many facts about Yehuwdâ´h, which these revisionists in the National Geographic Society deliberately altered to remake his image. Several scholars who objected to the National Geographic’s translation of the “Gospel of Judas” submitted their corrections of the mis translations which we share here: Scholars’ Corrections: Yehuwdâ´h “Judas” is a 13th demon.” Yehuwdâ´h “Judas” will lament and mourn his fate.” Yehuwdâ´h 's “Judas” seed controls the archons instead of being controlled by them.” Yehuwdâ´h “Judas” is separated from the holy (pure unshakeable) generation.” Yehuwdâ´h “Judas” will not ascend to the pure (pure unshakeable generation).” Yehuwdâ´h “Judas” cannot enter the heavenly house he has seen in his vision (his envoy “star” deceived him).” Yehuwdâ´h “Judas” does the worst thing he can do by sacrificing Yâhuwshúa`.” National Geographic Rendition: Yehuwdâ´h “Judas is the perfect enlightened gnostic.” Yehuwdâ´h “Judas ascends to the holy generation.” Yâhuwshúa` “Jesus wants Judas to betray Him. Yâhuwshúa` “Jesus wants to escape the material world.” Yehuwdâ´h “Judas performs a righteous act, serving “Jesus” by “betraying” Him.” Yehuwdâ´h “Judas will be able to enter the divine real as symbolized by His vision of the great house.” As the “thirteenth,” Judas surpasses the twelve disciples, and is lucky and blessed by this number.” Yehuwdâ´h "A Stranger to the Apostleship" The book of Cyril of Jerusalem, cursed by the paid-laborers as “PseudoCyril”, its translation to English (which uses traditional versions of names) says: “This is the calling of Jesus Christ with which he has called (the apostles). In peace. Amen. The calling, then, of the apostles was in this way by God. Simon Peter, John, Andrew and James were fishers, fish catchers according to the craft of this world. The father of Philip was a charioteer in the races. Thomas, however, was a tender of the waterwheel. Bartholomew was a gardener, a grower and seller of greens. Thaddeus was a stonecutter. Matthew was a tax collector. Simon Cananites was an inviter to the wedding. James the son of Alpheus was a tender of the waterwheel. Judas Iscariot has been estranged from the apostleship .’ What was the Greek term where you see “estranged ”? It is: Strong’s #3927: parepidemos – “one who comes from a foreign country into a city or land to reside there by the side of the natives, an alien alongside, a resident foreigner”. But the paid-laborer scholar Roelof van den Broek, who translated this book into English documented in his footnote that he translated this word as “estranged” because he did not believe the original word to be accurate, and that it should have been ἀπαλλοτριόομαι – “to be alienated; to be alienated from”, because the original did not agree with his mistaken belief that Yehuwdâ´h was called by Yâhuwshúa`. This is another example of the satanic conspiracy to repair the reputation of Yehuwdâ´h. Examine Strong's #245, ἀλλότριος which is defined as "another's, i.e., not one's own; by extension foreign, not akin, hostile" and another lexicon saying "belonging to another, foreign, strange, not of one's own family, alien, an enemy." But parepidemos does agree with a phrase frequently found in decoded scriptures, describing Yehuwdâ´h: "the son among My Yisrâ’ë´l," which means an alien alongside. But a "son"? How do we explain the adversary being an alien "son"? This goes perfectly with the record that yaldabosheth/yaldabaoth, the spawn of shame misconceived by Wisdom without the Father's consent, is also known as the adversary (satan). Yehuwdâ´h appears to be a standard omission associated with "shall be" in scribal coding in the LXX. It is found everywhere in decoded LXX. The determination of which of the two terms, Yehuwdâ´h/Yâhuwdâ´h it speaks of is made by the context (e.g., Yshá`Yâhuw 28: 18-19). It is Yehuwdâ´h when it refers to the adversary. Yehuwdâ´h is described as the son, not One's own(e.g., Yshá`Yâhuw 28: 21) since the adversary was not a son of our Father at all. This term is ἀλλότριος. What is the Meaning of "Iscariot"? Sometimes knowing the names of persons from antiquity can give further information. People of the lower classes did not have last names, and so to differentiate people with the same first name, descriptive designations were often added. Yehuwdâ´h, the son of Shim`ówn the leper/Pharushíy, had a second term applied to him, "Iscariot," seen transliterated into Greek as 'Iskariótes.' This is apparently transliterated and grecianized from Hebrew, Iysh-Qiryáthow, which means "the husband/man of His city." In some places where the LXX pre-advent scriptures reference Yehuwdâ´h, it denies him being of the City. The “City” refers to the City of the Most High as a spiritual organization composed exclusively of His own, so it excludes the adversary. This is seen in the "Glad Tidings of Yehuwdâ´h," where Yâhuwshúa` told him he would never enter His great house. One nineteenth-century scholar suggested that Iscariot came from a Hebrew word meaning "to stop up" (skr) and that it referred to the fact that he died by strangling (his throat was "stopped up"). Another scholar suggested that the term came from the Semitic words' isqa' re'ut – which might mean something like "one who makes money out of friendship." Some scholars thought that the term showed he came from the region known as Issachar (an Issachariot). Iscariot sounds like the Latin word for dagger, sica, and is possibly related to Jewish dagger-assassins known as the Sicarii. Does Yâhuwshúa` Make Mistakes? So, did Yâhuwshúa` make a mistake letting Yehuwdâ´h follow Him around? Did Yâhuwshúa` not know what would happen? Yes , Christians know He did because the regular canon clarifies that our Savior was quite well-aware of what Yehuwdâ´h would do and who he was. But consider this: The adversary made a mistake thinking that he should follow Him around to have His dirt-body killed, thinking it would put Him under his power and that he could confine Him in the underworld. Because he was so deceived, he made the blunder to apply death to One Who was untouchable and invisible to the forces of darkness. So, the adversary is one who did not know what would happen! The adversary lost the information war at that point because our Savior Yâ-hwéh Yâhuwshúa` had planned His Work before the cosmos was founded and went into the very middle, in the center of everything, and did everything in full view of everyone, to get every single One of the lights out of this darkness. The Work Yâhuwshúa` did on the cross is well-known to the world, and the adversary's erasing that from history is a lost cause for him. " The one (m.) having been blessed [is] he who [is] without regard for the one (m.) [ ~future impostor: Yehuwth â´h/sâţâ´n ] coming among the ones (m.) within one overcoming the demon (Yisrâ’ë´l) , against the name (n.) of Yâ-hwéh- Yâhuwshúa` of one overcoming the demon (Yisrâ’ë´l) ! " – MattithYâ´huw 23: 39, Luwqá’ 13: 35 Keep this in mind about Yehuwdâ´h, who is the incarnation of satan, who was neither called nor chosen and has recycled many times and in recent times as the antichrist. To read more about that, click here . So do not be fooled by the adversary's attempts to revise history through his paid laborers to make Yehuwdâ´h a 'misunderstood victim of antisemitism supposedly.' Sources: Free Firstfruists' Purer Scriptures (FPS) available for download here The thirteenth apostle : what the G ospel of Judas really says By De Conick, April D Cyril of Jerusalem On the Life and the Passion of Christ https://brill.com/view/title/22285?language=en Why the jews reject Yâhuwshúa`-http://revelationoutpost.com/uploads/3/4/1/7/34178686/the_harold_wallace_rosenthal_interview_-_1976.pdf [now defunct] The Narrative of Joseph of Arimathea -https://www.newadvent.org/fathers/0813.htm An example page of how Jewish scholars are accustomed to code scriptures to conceal their true meaning: The link to the source we once had is now censored, but we include it below for reference: http://www.realbiblecodes.com/torah_codes/begin_torahcodes/begin-torahcodes-3.php [no longer secure] back to top Run!...run from paid laborers of satan who require one to "help" support their mission either with monetary donations, offerings, or the purchase of scripture translations, books, or full access to their material content so that one's knowledge could increase. A loyal servant of our Savior gladly assists honest seekers of the Truth, and because Yâ-hwéh Yâhuwshúa` , through the Mother provides the information is free.

'Elohiym is a specific name of a demon progeny emanation of sâtâ´n (adversary). 'EL OHIYM IS NOT MY YÂ-HWÉH Satanic Names Substitutes Misidentify Who We Worship Elohim Wrongly Inserted Into in The Torah (Law) XXX Elohim (Strong's #430) , the plural form of the singular noun elo'ah (Strong's #433 ) , a masculine noun xxxx [ Disclaimer : In this document in which we expose the foreign demons’ terms ’el, ’eloah , and ’elohiym , we quote others using the term “god” although we do not use this term ourselves for the Most High Yâ-hwéh, because “ god ” is also a term literally meaning “demon” in Hebrew.] Historical Evidence The first one to discuss of the distinction between Yâ-hwéh, usually “translated” the LORD , and elohim , traditionally “translated” as god , was their Rabbi Judah “Yehuda” Halevi, 12th Century A.D, in his book The Kuzari . At the beginning of the fourth part of his book, Judah exposes something unbelievable that precedes all modern academic scholarship researched-information on the subject-term ‘elohim.’ Yehuda tells us that the term ‘elohim’ is not original to their traditions as Yehuwdiym Jews rather that the term comes from the pagan world. Their “Rabbi” Yehuda Halevi, a revered philosophical teacher by Jews, points out that the pagan word ‘elohim’ is plural as it refers to forces or powers of nature; while the name Yâ-hwéh was unknown to them because of their tradition to not pronounce His names. So as a result, these followers of the Torah (Law) did not know how to pronounce the name Yâ-hwéh. The Jews Only Said the Name Yâ-hwéh Once a Year Scholars tend to agree that ‘Yâ-hwéh’ is a representation of how the ancient sons of Israel initially pronounced the Tetragrammaton (Four-letter word) , called “Barbelo” in codices. According to the Yoma and the Mishnah , the commentaries on it state that “one does not pronounce the ineffable name outside” – the limits of the material temple. But “on the Day of Atonement, ten times did the high priest pronounce His name”; [The Sacred Name – yahweh.org] this occurred while all the priests who gathered around in the material temple did loud chanting so that the public would not hear His name <> pronounced. Elohim: Adopted From the Pagan World The Kna`aníym polytheistic-pantheistic ‘religion’ which pre-dates Judaism, was borrowed from another belief system and had a history created to give it credibility. The New World Encyclopedia describes the belief system of “divine clan, headed by the supreme god El ; the gods collectively made up the elohim .” El — according to The New World Encyclopedia , was the chief deity, god of the sky, father of many lesser gods and ruler of the divine assembly, also worshiped by the apostatizing sons of Israel. In Ugarit, the gods were called 'ilhm (elohim), or the children of El. Through the centuries, the pantheon of Canaanite gods evolved, so that El and Asherah were more important in earlier times, while Baal and his consorts came to fore in later years. Many of the Kna`aníym deities found their way into the Greek and Roman pantheon. For example, the characteristics of both El and Ba`´al are visible in Zeus . The polytheists and name-substituters used the Greek ‘theos’ as well as the Ivríyth ’el interchangeably whenever they made references to the True Most-High Yâ-hwéh, just as they did to foreign gods as theoi and ’elohim regardless that the terms theos and ’el is a title they used and not a personal name for Yâ-hwéh. Theos: Occurs in the LXX with few exceptions as a translation for the Hebrew word ’elohim and His name Yâ-hwéh. However, morphologically-analyzed decoded LXX shows that every instance of theos was not applied to our Yâ-hwéh although post-advent “New Testament” Greek scriptures DO use theos applied to Yâ-hwéh, never the theoi plural form, confirming that ’elohiym was not found in the Hebrew post-advent original scriptures and this points to a post-advent time being when the term ’elohiym was inserted into Hebrew manuscripts. Theos – Greek translations of Hebrew scriptures correctly translated Hebrew ’Ël to Greek Theos (Strong’s #2304), as both are a generic term for a power/mighty one. Like ’Ël, when not clearly stated to be referring to our Yâ-hwéh, Theos also refers to demons. Yet, Theos is freely used usually as a component of religious Christian terms such as Theology, Theophany, Theocracy, Theosophy, Atheism, etc. A cursory look at the surrounding terms in Greek lexicons will show you that Strong’s #2303 theion is “brimstone”, sulfur, because it was considered “divine incense, because burning brimstone was regarding as having power to purify, and to ward off disease” (OLB Greek Lexicon). Reportedly, Sh’ówl stinks, of sulfur among its other smells, because brimstone is associated with demons. The book of Chanówkh (“Enoch”) also reports (interestingly in chapter 66: 6), this: 6 And when all this happened, from that burning molten mass of metal and from the agitation which troubled them in that place, there arose a strong smell of sulfur, which became mixed with the waters; and that valley where the Watchers, who had been guilty of seduction, burned underneath its soil. Therefore, theos is originally a term referring to these kinds of worshiped entities which are associated to sulfur, demons again. Whenever they made references to the True Most-High Yâ-hwéh, since these singular terms were routinely found in scriptures, the name-substituters used the Greek ‘theos’ as well as the Ivríyth ’el to substitute out His name they despised, regardless that the terms theos and ’el is merely one description they used and not a personal name for Yâ-hwéh. The pluralism of “Elohim” Then the polytheists, just as they pluralized foreign gods as theoi and ’elohim , the polytheist Jewish scribes replaced Yâ-hwéh’s name and most singular ’Ël references with plural ’elohim also. Although Yâ-hwéh is One (’echâth) , a Union, and therefore not plural. In fact, He inhabits those He causes to come to exist, to become within His Union. At the End, when the number of His emanations will be complete A-Z (Alpha through Omega), then He will again become One at the End to do away with darkness. The misunderstanding of this is likely what commenced those erring into polytheism, and it’s easy to see, particularly when the various emanations of Him get materially personified by the errant, and then Wisdom gets worshipped as “Sophia” etc. etc. The Septuagint (LXX) is a Greek translation of pre-advent “Old Testament” scriptures, which was written in the 3rd century BC Roman Date, far before the Masoretic text which was altered after Yâhuwshúa`’s coming. The 70 scribes who translated it hid large amounts of information from the heathen Greeks, hiding it in codes. Today, these codes have been decoded and analyzed, and, with regard to theos, it shows that every instance of theos in it was not applied to Yâ-hwéh, every instance of “Theos” occurring next to Yâ-hwéh (which it substitutes Kurios for), it says “One without regard for the THEOS of ’aharón (light-carrier/lucifer)”, προς {<3364> “not”} θεος {<2> “aaron”} Occasionally “theos” has been seen to be plural, ALSO having <2> for ’aharón (light-carrier/lucifer). The other way “theos” is seen in this decoded LXX is as “not a theos” referring to sâtâ´n, because he is not a true power/mighty one. But in the post-advent “New Testament”, Greek scriptures DO use theos applied to Yâ-hwéh, but never using the theoi plural form, confirming that ’elohiym was not found in the Hebrew scriptures available at that time, and this points to a post-advent time being when the term ’elohiym was inserted into Hebrew manuscripts such as the Masoretic text. Encyclopedias and Other Writings about Elohim Agnōstos Theos Ἄγνωστος Θεός” - was found inscribed on Greek altars dedicated "to the unknown god." The inscription had no mystical or theosophical meaning, but arose out of a concern for religious “cultic safety: no one wanted to incur the wrath of” a god, whose name was unknown, but who might exist vexed by the lack of honors. In their ignorance (agnosticism), the Greeks erected an altar to whatever god they might have inadvertently left out of their pantheon. In the book of Yehuwdâ´h The Gospel of Judas , they call a “Glad Tidings” we read how Yâhuwshúa` corrected the way our brothers, His pupils, praised Him. In one instance Yâhuwshúa` finds them gathered together and seated in reverence to give His Father thanksgiving. Then Yâhuwshúa` laughs at the demons who misguided them to pray in the manner that they did customarily. Had they had the foresight that Who was standing in their midst was Yâ-hwéh within Yâhuwshúa` as One, they would have instead turned their eyes toward Him to praise Him. “The disciples said to [him], “Master, why are you laughing at [our] prayer of thanksgiving? We have done what is right. ” He answered and said to them, “I am not laughing at you. You are not doing this because of your own will but because it is through this that your god [’el] will be praised.” The English translators of this book substituted “god” in the place of theo s and the Greek translators of this Hebrew book had translated ’ël as Greek theos . With this information, reconsider why our Father Yâ-hwéh Yâhuwshúa` taught His pupils, our brothers, a proper way to pray in MattithYâ´huw 6: 9-20, and that is because our brothers, the first on earth to follow Yâhuwshúa`, had been unwittingly worshiping elohiym , because they were heeding something else that was not Him. Since Yâhuwshúa` was not referring to Himself as the god [’ël] they had praised, the term ’ël there is about a demon. The 1966 edition of the Unger’s Bible Dictionary, Page 412, states that the word EL is a Kna`aníym “Canaanite” word meaning “God,” or “Devil.” The Interpreter’s Dictionary of the Bible, Volume 1, Page 817, under DEMONOLOGY, says: The word ELOHIM, (plural form of EL), means “demons” and or “gods", saying that they adopted this plural form, copying the Canaanites to "summarize all the various manifestations of this deity". It is sad to see that more recent reference-books have had such information removed, to revise history in a huge and quiet cover-up conspiracy to make these terms appear entirely acceptable for those researching them, simply because the truth about ’elohíym is that it ALWAYS refers to demons (and perhaps magistrates) and never Yâ-hwéh. Click here to see a screenshot reference in the book. According to the Raelian Movement Professor Katherine Bayer writes, the Elohim are a human-like alien race that created life through material scientific processes on Earth. The Elohim “created humanity as an equal, just as their [own] creators once created them as equals. They claim that through this process, intelligent life continues to develop throughout”. The Raelians claim that only they hold that the correct meaning of the word Elohim , as "those who come from the sky." They believe the more traditional translations of the word are in error. back to top Elohim in Inspired Scripture Codices In the codices we also read more damning condemnations against the term ‘elohim ’: From The End Times of Këph “The Apocalypse of Peter ” - “And the Savior said to me, "Be strong, for you are the one to whom these mysteries have been given, to know them through revelation, that He whom they crucified is the First-born, and a dirt-body [made by means] of demons to dwell in, and the stony vessel in which they dwell [is] of elohim [demons], of the cross, which is under the Law. But He who stands accompanying him is the Living Savior.” – In another codex, Justin’s Baruch, The Three Principle of the All are: “the Good One, Elohim, and Edem (the Earth). The first two are male; the third is female. The Good possesses the knowledge about the All. The word "Elohim" is called the father of what is [materially] created and father of the Jewish god-demiurge. Therefore, we should not capitalize elohiym as it is not a proper name. And again in the “Secret book of Yâhuwchânâ´n John”: “Yal dabaoth raped Eve. She bore two sons. Elohim was the name of the first. Yâ-hwéh was the name of the second. Elohim has a bear’s face. Yâ-hwéh has a cat’s face. One is righteous; One is not. Yâ-hwéh is righteous; Elohim is not.” Note: The Aramaic “Yaldabaoth” (Yaldabosheth in Hebrew) means Sp awn of Shame in English, another term for the adversary who was not acknowledged to be given a formal name at all. We see here satan made “Elohim”, which we have shown above is “not righteous” (correct), as it never should apply to our Yâ-hwéh. Scriptures are interpreted spiritually, not materially. With regards only to the term “righteous”, note it means “correct”. The name “Yâ-hwéh” is correct, but the name “Elohim” is not, because it, being plural, does not apply to our Yâ-hwéh Yâhuwshúa` Who is One, not plural. This passage means satan made a Yâ-hwéh underneath himself, which is not the Yâ-hwéh far over him, Who is Yâhuwshúa`. The adversary "satan" also made many other demons and named them with the same names as those in the highest heavens, and this is why the same scripture says true original ones have two names, as our Yâ-hwéh is Yâ-hwéh Yâhuwshúa`. The accuser also made elohim , which we have shown above is not righteous, as it never should apply to our Yâ-hwéh. "The demons’ (own) names, given by Yaldabaoth, are mighty names But the Powers’ names reflecting the glory above Will bring about the demons’ destruction and remove their Power. That is why each has two names." I have said, ye are gods, and all of you are children of 'elohiym We are not elohiym (demons), we are sons of Yâ-hwéh Yâhuwshúa` and will not violate Yâ-hwéh’s instructions written in our hearts of loving Him more than anything , to not worship the gods, which are elohiym. Our King and Savior revealed Himself to Moshéh as Yâ-hwéh Yâhuwshúa`, and never as Elohim, a fact obliterated out of the heavily altered Masoretic text, but as Yâ-hwéh said, we should not apply name substitutes to Yâ-hwéh, nor create images or anything which honors elohiym, the demons. After examining the widespread common use of the term 'gods' which means ‘demons’ in Greek, we can now see how English-speaking deceived Christians use this specific name of the foreign deity ’elohíym , into applying it to Yâ-hwéh Yâhuwshúa`. I do hope this article blesses you, the reader, to discover that the use of pagan titles did not originate from the first and original, writings. They were, in fact, only accepted by the people of Israel after coming into the material land which was occupied by Kna`aníym, and adopting their wrong terminology, because the Kna`aníym once spoke Ivríyth; however, their worship was of DEMONS. But the terms finding their way into the public-view scriptures themselves had to be after the ascension of Yâhuwshúa`, as the post-advent scriptures still show knowledge of the material omitted in codes by the LXX scribes. Considering how our Father Yâ-hwéh Yâhuwshúa` commands us to honor His names, publish His names, boastfully praise His names - 5th Book of Moshéh Deuteronom y 30: 17-19, only several hundred years later, satan worked his scribes, the ones working , so that our scriptures became polluted and degutted, substituting Yâ-hwéh’s name out with the pagan titles of plurist elohim, adonai, and satan-specific god , and lord . Though at the time, the use of these pagan terms was accepted and routinely used by the name-censoring copyists to replace Yâ-hwéh’s name to identify Him in their writings, they remain nonspecific at best, and at worst, specific for satan. Moreover, these pagan words cannot call on Yâ-hwéh Yâhuwshúa`, the name they forgot and did not prefer, because what they prefer are TITLES of satan and his demons, which they obeyed to alter the scriptures. It is by the intervention of the self-willed-one, the spawn of shame, and lesser god that scholars, who interpret the original Aramaic, Hebrew, and Greek Scriptures into English (and other languages) were led to conspire in the removal of His name Yâ-hwéh altogether, and to hide the name of Yâhuwshúa`, Who defeated him, completely; Their excuse? The one often given for this detestable censorship involves a misinterpretation of the Third Law of satan they made by altering our Yâ-hwéh’s Ten Messages , to say not “take His name in vain.” How then can we openly make praise offerings professing His name (Todah Yâ-hwéh) and how then can we boast about our Yâ-hwéh: (Hal’luw Yâ´hu)? Conclusion: This third law of satan (from the ten commandments) only promotes satan by having people remove specific references to the Most High Yâ-hwéh to forget Him and steal His praise. Therefore, every nonspecific name substitute serves satan unless tied to Yâ-hwéh Yâhuwshúa`’s name, and every name substitute specific for satan, like elohim , should never be used for Yâ-hwéh Yâhuwshúa.` The safest best option is to call Him by His dual names and if one needs to say He is our Power or Sovereign or any other description, such as Father, to keep it in English. Let each one take care, in one’s offering of one’s Testimony, to keep it purely about Yâ-hwéh Yâhuwshúa`, the One without regard for the ’ël or ’elohiym of ’aharon (lucifer/light-carrier), so eliminate elohim and all other deceit of satan. Do not trust a Word from the mouths of anyone who comes in the name of demons, 'elohiym' (El), or any other name-substitutes for Yâ-hwéh Yâhuwshúa` . back to top Bibliography & Source Links: Johnson, Sarah, Religions of the Ancient World, Belknap Press, Cambridge, 2004) Strong, James, Strong’s Exhaustive Concordance of the Bible , Nelson, Nashville, 1990) The Thirteenth Apostle - What the Gospel of Judas Really Says by April D. DeConick The Gospel of Judas Translated by Rodolphe Kasser, Marvin Meyer, and Gregor Wurst, in collaboration with François Gaudard A Dictionary of Christian Biography, Literature, Sects, and Doctrines , Volume 4 The Apocalypse of Baruch: Translated from the Syriac A Dictionary of Gnosticism Paperback – November 17, 2009, by Andrew Phillip Smith Cady, Susan, Marian Ronan, and Hal Taussig. Wisdom's Feast: Sophia in Study and Celebration. New York: Harper & Row, 1989. Camp, Claudia V. Wisdom and the Feminine in the Book of Proverbs . Decatur: Almond, 1985. Cixous, "The Laugh of the Medusa. " The Critical Tradition: Classic Texts and Contemporary Trends. Ed. David H. Richter. Boston: Bedford, 1998. 1453-1471. Irigaray, Luce. "This Sex Which is Not One." The Critical Tradition: Classic Texts and Contemporary Trends. Ed. David H. Richter. Boston: Bedford, 1998. 1466-1471. Johnson, Elizabeth A. "Wisdom Was Made Flesh and Pitched Her Tent Among Us." Reconstructing the Christ Symbol: Essays in Feminist Christology. Ed. Maryanne Stevens. New York: Paulist, 1993. 95-117. Mollenkott, Virginia Ramey. The Divine Feminine . New York: Crossroad, 1984. Newman, Barbara. Sister of Wisdom: St. Hildegard's Theology of the Feminin e. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1987. Whybray, R.N. Wisdom in Proverbs: The Concept of Wisdom in Proverbs 1-9. Naperville: Allenson, 1965. https://brill.com/view/book/9789004296008/B9789004296008-s011.xml http://www.ancient-hebrew.org/dictionary/500.html#430 http://gnosis.org/naghamm/nhl.html https://www.iep.utm.edu/gnostic/ https://www.thoughtco.com/raelian-movement-95694 https://www.encyclopedia.com/environment/encyclopedias-almanacs-transcripts-and-maps/agnostos-theos http://www.newworldencyclopedia.org/entry/Canaanite_Religion https://www.westernseminary.edu/transformedblog/2013/12/09/pronouncing-the-divine-name/ https://worldhistory.us/ancient-history/ancient-near-east/el-and-the-elohim.php http://www.ancient-hebrew.org/dictionary/500.html#433 "A son of Mine with regard for Perdition (’Avadówn) cares little for the education of Yâ-hwéh, but do not despond under the correction of His Son, oh Yisrâ’ë´l, because whom Yâ-hwéh loves, Yâ-hwéh educates, and Yâ-hwéh scourges everyone that has regard for the Son, whom He acknowledges as His own". - Proverbs מְ 3:11-12 מְשָׁלִ֥ים

H Strong's # 05315 - Animal is a Néphesh ("soul") H Strong's # 05315 - Néphesh

- The enemy's favorite letter demon-god ariel god-demon Vri-l, in Sumerian word = "like god or god-like". Abbreviated as V. These are lizard reptiles morphed as people, very much like those in V, the 1980s Final Battle TV Series. Proverbs Chapter 6 12. The lord to ascend ( Bliyyá`al ) [ ~a good-for-nothing ] of Yisrâ’ë´l, and an outlaw transfers to ways of you which [are] not good, 13. but he who [ is ] without regard of Yâ-hwéh, the same One [ is ] the Son, he signals with the eye, moreover of Yâ-hwéh he gives a sign with the foot, even teaching of Yâ-hwéh with the signals of the fingers, “peace” 14. but with one (f.) having thoroughly distorted the mercy pertaining to the heart (f.) of Yâ-hwéh, he contrives evil things (n.) within, among the ones (m.) of Yisrâ’ë´l during every time-period, he who [is] without regard, such as this, organizes disturbances against the City.

Reincarnation, more accurately recycling,is early Christian common knowledge. WHAT IS REINCARNATION? On Recycling Most traditional Christian doctrines believe in a resurrection of one’s néphesh (“soul”) into a new and different kind of body of pure flesh, a new body made possible by our Savior (Yâhuwshúa`), because it’s described and explained in Qorinthíym (“Corinthians”). But the question of whether a néphesh (“soul”) ever returns to live more lifetimes in a different body of the same kind of corruptible flesh is one being denied by most traditional Christian doctrines, although a few approved examples remain in the establishment’s teachings, for example that of the son of ’avadówn (“son of perdition”) being both Yehuwthâ´h (“judas”) and the coming impostor-savior “antichrist”, and the mention that Yâhuwchânâ´n the Immerser (“john the baptist”) is ’EliyYâ´huw. We are calling this returning in a different body of the same kind of corruptible flesh, “recycling ” of the néphesh (“soul”). But beyond these examples, most Christians do not include the recycling of the néphesh (“soul”) into different bodies of the same kind of corruptible flesh in their belief-set. Why not? Most, simply because of lack of information, some due to trust in their teachers who repeatedly allege this lifetime to be their only chance and possibility to join their flocks, and few due to having read the establishment’s approved canons of scriptures they translated in a way to support their accepted doctrines, and trusting those. Yet religions outside Christianity report recycling and numerous personal experience testimonials report recycling, and historians report recycling to have been part of early Christian doctrine also. How is this topic important? Why is it vital for us to know this happens? And how can we find the evidence that has been covered up within the inspired scriptures? This webpage will answer these questions. The Recycling/Returning (Anastrepho) –AKA “Reincarnation” of the Néphesh One new age prosperity priestess, Oprah Winfrey, posed a curious question to the audience on her TV show, which aired sometime in the 1990s (Roman calendar), which we stumbled across in a recent year, which publicly displayed some of the consequences of ignorance about recycling, that provoked this article. Oprah’s chosen panel was contrasted by a Christian audience that struggled, trying to defend against Oprah’s intellectualized ideology embracing one of man’s many mistakes – which is to believe that there are many different ways to ascend towards the Father, Yâ-hwéh Yâhuwshúa` . Oprah attacked that the One Way scriptural concept itself is wrong. One Christian guest shouted, “Jesus is the Way!”, to which Oprah responded (and I paraphrase): ‘what if you are somewhere on a remote part of the earth and never get to hear the name of our Savior? What if you are a person who lives with a loving heart, as our Savior would have had you to live and for the very purpose He came to earth, and die without ever having heard His name? Does he/she go to hell?’ By saying this, Oprah denied the need for Yâhuwshúa` to ever have come and give up the life of His dirt-body on the cross, making Him irrelevant. So, several guests attempted to allay every negative opinion against our Savior made by Oprah. The audience’s group of Christians failed miserably, attempting to bargain with Oprah, because they were spiritually naked, not equipped with the Truth, nor empowered with His wisdom, to overcome her lies from satan. The reason for their defeat is simple, Christianity is reprogrammed with disinformation and taught that a properly inspired developed mind is one which accepts as true all what Irenaeus and the Church Fathers approved so as to dismiss recycling as heresy, as they did centuries ago. Such deceived Christians disbelieve in the recycling of the néphesh (“soul”) into new material bodies, also known as “reincarnation” to other religions, because the powers of darkness showed the foolish pastors teaching the error that through teaching ‘one life to live’, they could increase their material profits and gains through extortion of joining them or dying and going to hell forever. Those other religions using the term “reincarnation ” are unaware of or deny the resurrection into His new and different kind of pure flesh bodies. Therefore, because of reincarnation’s association to pagan religions, to some Christians, it becomes an alien, pagan, foreign-sounding heresy, which they view with horror if not alarm. They cannot accept its existence without renouncing their faith in what the canon says, and risk being ostracized by their flocks, because it’s smeared due to its association with Hinduism and other oriental religions, which openly embrace this concept which spread to other parts of Asia. Since reincarnation as a term does not specify what kind of flesh a néphesh (“soul”) reenters, we find it inadequate, so we use the term recycling when reentering material corruptible flesh, and resurrecting when entering the spiritual, incorruptible pure flesh new body He gives us. Recycling inherently means returning as the same material, and the neologism spares us having to explain and disclaim those thinking it originated from paganism. How Did this Bit of Truth get to Asia? Would it surprise you to learn that our Savior Yâhuwshúa` discussed reincarnation openly with His pupils? These very pupils were sent off as His delegates (“apostles”), and it was these who also traveled to Asia carrying our Savior’s teachings to our blind brothers there. After their teachings became diluted by satan, they still kept various concepts, albeit Headless; one such lesson is of us pairing again with our heavenly envoy or twin, “didymos” in Greek, (syzygy in Coptic). in Hebrew, Tâ’ówm, which is where the name “Thomas” evolved, and this re-pairing is which completes us in Him with Wisdom in the marriage chamber, our separate pure place, as a perfect union, but they lost the point and turned this into “tao” or “daoism.” Evidently, the same situation occurred in India, undoubtedly. Since they had learned long ago from Yâhuwshúa`’s delegates that the area behind one’s forehead, between the eyes, is the separate place and the sitting Throne reserved for Yâ-hwéh Yâhuwshúa`, the adversary excised this teaching, starting with His names, and what remains instead is sporting a “bindi” painted spot on their foreheads to “protect their “third eye,” the false vision source of the evil spirit occupying their separate place. Believers in Yâhuwshúa` as well as rebels against Him recycle, to continue their work for Him or against Him, respectively. Once a néphesh is granted the Truth in a capacitated lifetime and obtains Life, they may still recycle, being sent to teach the Truth to others. This concept also has vestiges left in India’s Hinduism, with the recycling of those ignorant of the Truth described as suffering “samsara," and obtaining this Truth as achieving “nirvana." But that Truth of Yâ-hwéh Yâhuwshúa` was not retained in their teachings. So to accurately answer Oprah’s question: every néphesh which originated from Yâ-hwéh incarnates through several lifetimes over time and is only able to attain eternal permanence (existence) by correctly acknowledging the Truth, that Yâhuwshúa` is Yâ-hwéh, our Savior, and giving Him the preference (mistranslated as “glory”) during one’s more capable nativity (“generation”) than one’s earlier blotted out lives, wherein he/she may never have heard His name. But notably, to negate Oprah’s deceit, no one (other than Yâ-hwéh Yâhuwshúa`) has ever qualified on their own to fulfill the law (torah) of satan, and all fell short of reaching the Father. One only gets reckoned correct (“righteous”) One Way , through Him, acknowledging and professing Yâ-hwéh Yâhuwshúa`, a name already expunged also from the establishment’s teachings. But these Truths were not present there among Oprah’s studio audience, much less among her panel. The Word Reincarnation/Recycling in Scriptures The word reincarnation derives from Latin roots re- (prefix), “again and again” (repetition) incarnare , meaning to reenter “flesh.” Remember, we said it doesn’t specify which kind of flesh. Yet, in fact, “Reincarnation” is a misnomer because the néphesh (“soul”) recycles in a new but similarly corruptible dirt-body but not making the same previous flesh body again. Therefore, pay no mind to those finding lookalike ancient images resembling current people as evidence of recycling. The only physical resemblance may be in the eyes , the windows to the néphesh (“soul”). Because of the ubiquitous acceptance of the term “reincarnation,” some ‘Bible thumpers’ (often KJV enthusiasts) argue that “reincarnation” cannot be true because that particular word is not found in their approved translation, the “Authorized Version.” That is only true because they have been looking for the wrong word . The main word to search for in Greek is “ANASTREPHO," found in both Greek post-advent scriptures and Septuagint (LXX) pre-advent scriptures. For those truth-seekers wanting pearls for word searches, here they are : Anastrepho , Greek Strong’s #390, means to return up, found in lexicons “to turn hither and thither, to turn one’s self about, sojourn dwell in a place” (recycling), and only metaphorically reinterpreted as “to conduct one’s self, behave one’s self, live” in order to conceal its true meaning of recycling in establishment translations of scripture. But wasn’t scripture first in Hebrew? Looking at what Hebrew words they translated as anastrepho, we relevantly find Hebrew Strong’s #02015 hâphákh , meaning also “to turn about, turn around, to change, transform, and in the hithpael conjugation, “to transform oneself, to turn this way and that, turn every way." We also find anastrepho translates Hebrew Strong’s #03318 yâtsâ´’, to be brought out/forth, to go or come out or forth, to come or go forth, to come out of. Also translated as anastrepho, we find #06213 `âsâ´h to work, #06437 pânâ´h to turn, be turned back, #07725 shuwv to return, come back, to bring back, cause to return, and #0813 shânâ´h to change, alter, to be repeated, to disguise oneself; all relevant to recycling . But if you look up these instances, you will find them all mistranslated in the establishment’s approved Authorized Version(s). Scriptural references to recycling of the néphesh (“soul”) are quite common in the pre-advent scriptures before Yâhuwshúa`’s ministry and post-advent scriptures. When retranslated correctly, they appear to mention recycling without much ado or fanfare, as though it had been a well-known and accepted belief. The book of Dâ´niyyË´’l and YchezqË´’l refers to recycling and the same specific people reappearing at vastly different times. The scroll of Bârúwkh also discusses Bârúwkh’s ‘returning’ to live in these end-times along with other Yâhuwshúa`-believers. Proper scripture translations of other scriptures of Páulus (“Paul”) reveal that people hearing him had trouble believing in Páulus’ preaching of the Resurrection (returning to live in new different pure flesh bodies) because they already thought they return anew in a newborn (returning to live in new different corruptible flesh bodies). (Source quote Theókleia & the ankh Egyptians and their monks found in philliposiym 3:17-19) So, Who/What Orchestrated this Massive Cover-up? The central business agenda of the establishment’s conservative Church Fathers and other religious authorities was to prefer higher numbers of followers for greater profits, being guided by evil dark agencies of satan, who placed them in official positions of authority over the believers in Yâ-hwéh Yâhuwshúa`. They happen to be those nepheshes who have not accepted the Truth, recycling to continue their work against Yâhuwshúa`. Their aim has always been to choose what doctrines they can stretch or alter to fit their agendas and block and smear whatever appears threatening to them in the various scriptures and, more recently, in numerous resurfaced Gnostic frameworks, to mistranslate them using their approved scholars to publicly ostracize and excommunicate everyone and blacklist everything they believe to be morally inexcusable in their eyes. In this way, good, significant, and revelatory texts inspired by Yâhuwshúa` were very much and often lumped together with satanic writings and labeled as PSEUDO (false/fake) uninspired heresy and thereby anathema (kept separate/cursed). Their strange consensus that there cannot be any more Yâhuwshúa`-inspired books of glad tidings than four in number is from Irenaeus, one of the so-called “church fathers”, because he saw there are four winds, and four directions; so they thought it should be fitting to ban other inspired books of glad tidings; this served their purposes by eliminating many books condemning them. The Author’s Personal Experience Until the summer of 2005 RD (roman dates), I had never investigated recycling ("reincarnation"), and the few ideas I had about it were shaped mainly by disparaging comments and attitudes I had occasionally encountered from the Christian community. However, I was always drawn to this topic because, from my very early childhood, I had a recurring nightmare: I was standing on a barren, white land, surrounded by others—some of them dressed like me, in long robes and headdresses. Not far off, Roman soldiers were approaching. The atmosphere erupted in panic; there was yelling and screaming. Then, suddenly, my knees gave out, and I saw my own head roll away from my body, now lying headless among others on the ground. My eyelids didn’t close right away. I didn’t blink. Somehow, I kept my gaze fixed on the final seconds of that life I once lived. The last image burned into my sight was of Roman soldiers—leather Caligula sandals pounding the earth, swords raised high, storming forward, trampling the dead, and continuing the slaughter. I searched museum databases for images of the women’s headdresses from my recurring dream. The results only extended as far back as the 14th century. From this, I’ve concluded that I am a recycled 1st-century believer in Yâ-hwéh Yâhuwshúa. Like myself, others recall past lives during their subsequent childhoods, found in all cultures worldwide. The Dangers of Keeping us Ignorant of Our Previous Lives Scriptural/spiritual lack of knowledge, which is unintentional, is ignorance, whereas when it is intentional, it is rebellion. Lack of spiritual information (nescience) about our previous lives is one such ignorance that is not only dangerous to one’s néphesh (“soul”) but also makes us spiritually naked (undefended), making us thus vulnerable, empowering dark agencies to exploit it inserting their misinformation and threats – and this ploy is intentional, and this strategy is widespread everywhere. It is in every Truth-seekers’ interest to research the translations of various scriptures, canonical and noncanonical, as one needs no proficiency in Greek or Hebrew to uncover revealing hidden messages in scriptures that go against the establishment’s traditional doctrines. But to do so correctly, one needs His guidance, acknowledging Yâ-hwéh Yâhuwshúa` by name, and making use of a good concordance, Scripture dictionary, and even individual historical records by live observers such as Bârúwkh (“Baruch”), Nóach, and Josephus. Learning what scriptures really say recovers the knowledge lost by unscrupulous alterations of scripture and prevents our exploitation by the forces of darkness. The scripture canon teaches that a man’s néphesh is in a state of pilgrimage and that the dirt-body it inhabits is NOT its correct dwelling place but a temporary place of sojourn, which implies that its true home is beyond this material plane (cosmos). Although it says that at physical death, the néphesh (“soul”) goes to sh’ówl, the dirt-body to the earth (dirt), and the spirit returns to the Father, but we are not from sh’owl, that is not our home. Therefore, we from Him must somehow leave it to return to the First, even if we did not learn His name during a lifetime. Why would they allow such questions to remain in our bibles? Why SO few? Some of the lights stolen by satan are still within his corps (spiritual body), not emerging yet, so Oprah proposes they must be emerging out through some other way than our Savior, during only their first lifetime. She does not know or hides that she knows that Satan buries our néphesh (“soul”) again and again, embedded for a lifetime again in a flesh-and-blood vessel, an animal body, a temporary habitation, to be granted another opportunity to learn the Truth from our previous mistakes. But his demons perpetuate our slavery giving us the handicap of losing our memory of our past lives and experiences by giving us a cup of forgetfulness that blots the memories of our earlier life; However, our néphesh - which is not part of the brain - has a blueprint that exists after death and contains within itself the mental and moral quality which is displayed as "character" and the essence of our true self (being). All these things are found in inspired scriptures, and finding this out can prevent the tragedy of dying without the Truth to recycle still ignorant of the Truth because life living within Him is so much better. Please click on this link to review our findings to some poorly translated scriptures in the canon, now accurately translated, demonstrating recycling . Suppression of the Knowledge of the Recycling of the Néphesh Pride associated with knowing anything is most active in people who know the least, especially with regard to the things of Yâ-hwéh Yâhuwshúa`. The pride about knowledge among the educated of this world, whether self-educated or formally educated, is based on collected heaps of material facts rather than by accepting His understanding of how the immaterial world affects people’s néphesh, found in scriptures. The “church fathers” were proud like their father, satan, and worked to suppress this knowledge of recycling, making the sources used in education only contain their teachings, so this pride would continue the work of suppressing the Truth. A false understanding many proud religious recycling-deniers promote is their belief that a néphesh is just the life of our dirt-bodies, and ‘what you see is all there is,' when, in fact, the dirt-body is not the real self but a mere temporary covering for the néphesh. According to them, when one dies, that’s their end; sh’ówl to them is the grave, nothing more – this is a Jehovah’s witness and SDA false doctrine. The néphesh is a spiritual seed, not material, and not even the same shape as the dirt-body and is the thing that recycles. Confusion arises because the ‘fiery one,' the flesh’s néphesh, which is an emanation of the adversary, is sometimes mentioned in scriptures, giving another meaning to néphesh as being one’s carnal (sexual) appetites. That néphesh dies with the death of the dirt-body. Proud materially scientific recycling-deniers claim that the thousands of recycled-néphesh cases generally do not stand up to their examination but are explicable in terms of natural causes such as genetics, repressed memory, and even lying has been suggested. Certainly, one can think of many other issues about which the authorities deny the truth despite mountains of evidence. Recycling-deniers, in their denials, have even attributed these facts to the work of occult powers. Notwithstanding the scientific evidence to the contrary, many recycling-deniers disagree with it because it is laborious to change to believe in these concepts without having the memory of a personal experience. A personal memory, we believe, adds much to contribute to one’s intellectual understanding to obtain a spiritual belief. Church History of Suppressing the Concept of Recycling Now a quick look at some vitally important “church” history, which contributed to the suppression of the concept of recycling, and then at what accurately translated scriptures tell us concerning the subject. In short, the truth about the recycling of the néphesh/past lives was generally acknowledged in the Judaism of old testament times (except among the Tsathuwqíym (“Sadducees”), who didn’t accept His resurrection or any transmutation of the “soul”) was known by believers in Yâhuwshúa`. But in 553 B.C., a focal point and exceptionally unpleasant incident transpired, which buried the truth (more about that below). The establishment’s interpretation of scriptures depends on biased standards they forced on the content, not on sound standards of scriptural understanding, of having the Mind of the Anointed, and making an accurate translation. The current establishment’s interpretation results from a centuries-long perpetuation of an illegal Church council's ruling, dating from 553 A.D., that reincarnation was not to be a part of the Church’s dogma because Origen was excommunicated for widely reteaching this. Very few people know about this bit of history; fewer still know the background of this decision or that Origen had been reckoned a “church father” before that. Specifically, “ The Roman Emperor Constantine married his way into power. His wife mysteriously disappeared. His second wife was his ticket to the throne. Then he had her killed. His third wife was a prostitute who had risen to the throne in the same diabolical ways Constantine had and who lived to have a devastating effect on the belief in reincarnation. She feared [sic (because her fear)] that her sins would follow from lifetime to lifetime infuriated her. She did not like the idea of karma. Her life was filled with lies and treachery. She was not interested in advocated [sic (advocating)] any religion that would demote her in another life. Thus, she persuaded Emperor Constantine to remove reincarnation from Christianity. ” (source: http://kuriakon00.tripod.com/reincarnation/kuriakon_reincarnation.htm) The prostitute turned empress and her various ecclesiastical henchmen engineered this action, who imprisoned the elderly then-pope (when he refused to summon the council) and therefore sent him for six months to a forced labor camp until he agreed to sign the rulings of the unlawful council. It was also at that time that nearly all of Origen's famous writings, a "Church Father" who wrote (among other things) about the truth of recycling of néphesh (“reincarnation”), aka “transmutation,” were collected and systematically burned. We became aware of his doctrines only because of a few remaining manuscripts, plus many references to his work in other "Church Fathers" texts. The idea that a néphesh would go through many lifetimes, recycling, on a journey towards a possible relationship with Yâ-hwéh Yâhuwshúa` to arrive at a final decision and return to Oneness with the Most High was only too dangerous to the power-hungry empress’ schemes to be permitted. And so, we were all victimized to become ignorant of this by the sordid history of the Church, including the corruption and oppression caused by the Roman Catholic Church, by their suppression of anything Hebrew and their non-Hebrew cultures and traditions. Many recycling-deniers would argue that the primary purpose of the Fifth Ecumenical Council of Constantinople (held in 553 A.D.) was to ease the tensions in the Church caused by the Council of Chalcedon 100 years prior to that; however, the council had convened to discuss the subject of transmutation of the néphesh (“soul”): recycling. Please, read THE ANATHEMATISMS OF THE EMPEROR JUSTINIAN AGAINST ORIGEN. (1): Number II. here: https://sourcebooks.fordham.edu/basis/const2.asp We defer to "The Formation of the New Testament Canon" by Richard Carrier (2000), visible at https://infidels.org/library/modern/richard_carrier/NTcanon.html Carrier's research paper highlights the political schisms within the early (post-apostolic) Church that warred over what was sound doctrine and what allegedly wasn't, and it exposes the lack of objectivity used to choose which books made it into the Bible and which ones didn't, and it records how the evolving Roman Catholic Church mainly determined what books the Bible we now have would contain. Church History of Suppressing the Concept of Recycling One common reason that Christians disagree is due to the doctrine of the alleged flawlessness of their Bible. This is something which was also drilled into me for decades; however, the massive alterations, the poor translations, and the enormous omissions of what they did not desire to include in it, make it clear that it’s not THEIR translation of the Bible which is the inspired scripture without error that we cannot deny, rather, those are the originals prior to all the changes they made. And subsequently, they base their false teachings upon bad translations and alterations made to support their false teachings, and Truth gets denied. The popular protest raised by Bible-believing Christians to the idea of “reincarnation” (recycling) is based on one verse, and one verse alone: KJV Hebrews 9:27. KJV Hebrews 9: 27 has long been a Christian traditionalist mainstay to defend their belief system of having only one life to live, but to choose their eternal destiny of heaven or hell. They even claim that Yâhuwshúa` spoke against recycling of the néphesh in “John 8:23” and that supposedly 1 “Corinthians” 15:47 supports that claim. Tragically, as with many other verses within their corrupted scriptures, over-reliance on its alleged flawlessness has influenced scholars’ interpretations and has concealed to them what this verse really says, so even other translations of this scripture echoes their mistakes, whether in the KJV, NIV, NASV, or any other of the central English translations. And usually, it’s quoted out of context to be even more misleading, as: 27. And as it is appointed unto men once to die, but after this the judgment: Surely if this were a flawless rendition, recycling would be debunked, yet even their canon contains several accounts of people who died once and were resurrected in the same body, dying later again physically generally, so the “once” term is wrong; and the néphesh that inhabited both the dirt-bodies of ‘’ËliyYâ´huw (“Elijah”), and Yâhuwchânân the Immerser (“John the Baptist”) was in these two separate vessels as recorded in scripture, without a “judgment” after it either, so this alone should define with certainty that Hebrews 9:27 is yet another mistranslated verse. Any interpreter will vouch that it’s impossible to translate something the interpreter does not understand, so we see in the context of Hebrews 9:27 many concepts their translators had not known, due to their self-imposed ignorance of many scriptural truths, so they could not understand it to translate it correctly. Yet, in short, here is how Hebrews 9:27, in context, should be translated, and for a study giving a thorough explanation with evidence of why this is a correct translation, see this link . To the `Ivríym Chapter 9 24. Because not into handmade “pure places” did He Who the Anointed One enter into, counterparts of the ones of the true ones; rather, into the same one the One heaven now, to manifest Himself with the One, with the external appearance of the One of the Power on behalf of us, 25. but not in order that frequently He should bring Himself, as however much he who the high priest enters into the one “pure places” yearly within, with the bloodshed belonging to another; [ ~sâţâ´n ] 26. since then it would have necessary for Him frequently to suffer from the founding of the cosmos (material universe). But now, once only , over the completion of the Ones of the eternal ones, for the abolition of the error [ ~sâţâ´n ] , by means of the one’s [~the error’s (sâţâ´n/Yehuwthâ´h)] slaughter of the same One, He has been made manifest, 27. and according to how many He reserves for Himself: [~He manifests] to the ones belonging to the sons of the dirt-man (’âthâ´m) [ ~not servants of the name (1 Moshéh 3: 20)], once only , to die off, but amidst this thing, [is] the separation/selection [ ~144,000] [~at Sixth Seal] 28. thus [is] also he [ ~of the selection ] the anointed One, once only , having been brought to Him, for the One ‘ to carry up the errors of the many ones’ outside [ ~outside Yisrâ’ë´l – times of the witnesses ] . Of the second time, separated apart of the error He shall be seen, belonging to the ones [being] Him, the ones being patiently waited for, for the deliverance. The Mishandling of Recycling in the Hands of Pseudoscience Those fascinated by the material world and studying it to know how material works are called scientists. Yet many fields of material science are notoriously unreliable because they contain much influence from the spiritual dimension, of which material scientists deny the existence of a spiritual world. In psychology and psychiatry, this is so bad that even the materially-minded laugh at its unreliability, so we call the material study of spiritual things pseudoscience. Yet there are now growing numbers of extraordinarily reputable and scientific research investigations documenting past lives being conducted by some of the world's top psychologists and psychiatrists, particularly with the memories of the experiences of children’s previous lives. But these material scientists fail to know the spiritual facts about why this happens because of its suppression by this world’s Christian religious authorities. The late physician Dr. Ian Stevenson, department head at the University of Virginia for four decades, and psychologist Dr. Brian Weiss and now by Jim B. Tucker together have identified more than 2500 cases which consist of children whose memories, specific knowledge, habits behaviors match those of particular individuals who were dead before the children were born. Many of the children had unique birthmarks, scars, or congenital defects that mimic wounds, in the exact location, on the bodies of the deceased individual. Many people ascertain having lived before their current life; these recollections are referred to as the return of the “soul” recycling, not as reincarnation. Some illnesses, physical deformities, and symptoms are encoded in our minds. Dr. Stevenson refers to his book “Reincarnation and Biology,” a case of a youngster who had disturbing graphic memories from a previous life. The young man had developed rope marks in the area where he suffered an injury in an earlier life. If a person’s mind can cause physical marks to appear on his or her dirt-body, recollections of a previous existence manifest with imprints on the present body, said Dr. Stevenson. Various birthmarks appear to identify with traumatic experiences in past lives—and these recollections blur as the memories fade. It is a reality that unless one begins to manage aberration built up in past lives, one will not progress in The Way. However, Yâ-hwéh Yâhuwshúa` urges us to “know the self” and gives us the tools through Him to handle upsets and aberrations from past lives that adversely affect one’s self in the present (life), thus freeing one to live a much happier material existence in Him. In the case of the author, this is the birthmark evidencing the fatal wound in my previous life, described above There is also a notable four-part video series on YouTube.com documenting the incredible tale of Louisiana's little James Leininger — through thorough interviews with his parents; his dad was a skeptic from the beginning but was persuaded after comprehensive studies; James' mom makes a remark to indicate they are likely Christians. You can download the case of The Case of James Leininger , documented by the University of Virginia. Dr. Paul Von Ward, in his article on the “genome,” writes that when a person can master a skill or an art at a very young age, he or she has acquired these skills over various life cycles and might begin to exhibit these extraordinary ideas, skills, or interests at a very young age, without prior experience (in that current life). The most frequent answer is “savant’ or “prodigy” — while this provides a label, it does not offer an explanation. Many prodigies have a fragile nature, sometimes, their knowledge and skills coexist with a mental (spiritual) disability. The Erasure of Past-Life Memories As mentioned earlier, it is written in inspired scriptures "codices" that our previous life’s memories are erased by the rulers/archons/demons (aka “extraterrestrials/aliens”) of this material region. This is what happens after one's physical death (and the number one reason for their fear of death): Once the non-acknowledging néphesh exits the dirt-body, it arises spiritually naked; successively, the receivers of god[-ariēl], come and lead the néphesh out of the body and, depending on the chastisement, spend three days touring with it, along with its counterfeit spirit which accuses it, into all the regions to which that néphesh has traveled. Thereafter, that néphesh is taken down to Sh’ówl before Yaldabosheth (“spawn of shame”) to receive its beating with fiery (underworld's electrical-) whips. Afterward, that néphesh (“soul”) is given the cup of forgetfulness, filled with all the different desires and all forgetfulness, and straightaway, when the néphesh drinks out of the cup, it forgets all the regions (past-lives) which it has traveled and forgets all of the chastisements which it has experienced. Then the cup of forgetfulness becomes a body outside the néphesh, and it creates the fiery component, which resembles the néphesh in all its figures and makes itself become like it, which is what is called the counterfeit spirit. Finally, that néphesh is cast into the regions of the sphere, being thrust in a dirt-body to recycle. Inspired by The Second Book of the Savior “Pistis Sophia," A George Horner Literal Translation Within our self/nephesh we have all of our stored data as an open access journal, and it performs only familiar things to itself and does not stray from its character. In Sh’ówl, the nephesh vows never to err again, but after drinking the wine of forgetfulness, she is bound to a vicious cycle, continuing to eventually repeat her sins because she has drunk and has forgotten all her errors. The End of Recycling – Obtaining the Resurrection “ Do not expect, therefore, the carnal resurrection, which is destruction; and they are not stripped of it (the flesh) who err in expecting a resurrection that is empty .” - The Dialogue of the Savior "People who say they will first die and then arise [“resurrect”] are wrong. If they do not receive the Resurrection [Garment of Light] first, while they are [materially] alive, they will receive nothing when they die [arise naked]. So, it is said of [His] anointing, “Great is the anointing,” for if people receive it (Him), they will live." – Glad Tidings of Phílippos A Néphesh Arising (spiritually) Naked Garment, Man of Light, Little One, Envoy, Resurrection, etc., are a few of the terms used for our Spirit Companion in Yâ-hwéh Yâhuwshúa`. At the last Trumpet, being in our Garment of Light, we will become invisible and consume corruptibility, and even archon demons would not be able to apprehend us. It is written that the chosen ones (“elect”) have already received the Resurrection, and as the delegate said of Him, we suffered with Him, arose with Him, and ascended with Him. Since we currently are visibly present in this world, we are wearing the garment (dirt-body) of the world. But as Phílippos writes, we “are in this world, it is fitting for us to acquire the Resurrection (now ), so that when we strip off the flesh, we may be found in Rest and not walk (be found naked ) in the middle.” If we do, from the Savior, we radiate His Light like streams of Light and are sustained by Him until our material death in this cosmos; This is the resurrection of the spirit, which swallows up the resurrection of the flesh. All living beings contain within their 'self' something so unique and so distinctive to an individual identity, visible in the totalities of qualities that make such a person become unlike anyone else in the world, and that is their collective character - intelligence (“archon-knowledge”), temper, beliefs, etc., is what distinguishes a person from another. Our collective character (within) is contained inside our spiritual self/nephesh. So, suppose when making a decision about Yâ-hwéh Yâhuwshúa`, a person changes their mind and turns away (“repents”) from following after evil four-winds and the works of darkness when this same person suffers a material death. In that case, this person is bound to recycle again, acknowledging Yâ-hwéh Yâhuwshúa` in their life. Suppose a person dies without being called to accept Yâ-hwéh Yâhuwshúa`. In that case, this nephesh is bound to recycle from Sh’owl having the same mindset ('collective character') it had before, UNTIL Yâ-hwéh Yâhuwshúa` calls on it, during whatever capable nativity it has been thrust into a dirt body. Nevertheless, when a néphesh comes to exist acknowledging Him, the spirit of Truth, our Envoy Companion, is the One Who acts as our external-hard drive bringing up things from our antiquities (past lives) to our present memories when we need them because we cannot accomplish such massive tasks from our own accord without Yâ-hwéh Yâhuwshúa` , while sojourning in the matrix (matter/mother/material) world – which is a place of forgetfulness. Otherwise, a person who stores terrible behavioral patterns, such as the ways of Çthom (“Sodom”), in their nephesh before finding out the Truth is bound to repeat the same mistakes from a previous life over and over again. The natural END of recycling into corruptible dirt-bodies (the empty carnal resurrection of the rebirth into corruptible flesh) is our resurrection into incorruptible pure flesh spiritual bodies, which for most will occur after the death of the physical dirt-body. However, some will be transformed into it in the blink of an eye. Certainly, none of us will die or recycle after that. But believers in the Truth of Yâ-hwéh Yâhuwshúa` from the past generations have been recycling still. They are all going to be among us during these end times. They will be the 144,000 witnesses after the separation of the living from the dead, at the 6th seal, when while remaining still in mortal physical carnal bodies without their fiery ones, these will be His witnesses as sealed sons of Yâ-hwéh. That is the last lifetime these live in corruptible flesh, and these will ingest (convert) the heathen masses predicating 1260 days as being His witnesses. Then they and their sealed converts are killed, and after 3 ½ days, they will be resurrected and called up to Yâ-hwéh Yâhuwshúa`. A Néphesh Arising (spiritually) Naked Exposé – Warning Against Hypnosis Some believers in Yâ-hwéh Yâhuwshúa` reading this will legitimately desire to know who they were in previous lives, because their néphesh forgot, due to the cup of forgetfulness given by the demons before they recycled. If you are one of these, please understand that though your néphesh forgot, your twin, your envoy “little One” did not forget, and He retains all those memories. So, the proper way to recall is to supplicate Yâ-hwéh Yâhuwshúa` through prayer for these to be told to you, and that will be reliable. It is an improper way and unreliable to utilize hypnosis to recollect such information because hypnosis is mediated by the evil spirits which are riders of the person hypnotized, and though some information may be true, it will contain deception due to the source, and misinformation. One should not meddle therefore with this mode of paranormal/supernatural information inquiry, which voluntarily deepens the néphesh’s imprisonment to its cohabiting evil spirits. Therefore, we believe hypnosis is never a useful tool, we deplore the commercial exploitation and misleading claims that are often made for it. A large part of what emerges under hypnosis is archon-led. We also discourage consultations with psychics, gurus, spiritual mediums or teachers, savants or any persons who claim to have the ability to help assist one in remembering one’s previous lives. And every eye will see Him, even those recycled-ones who pierced Him! Conclusion: Enforced ignorance perpetuates the power of darkness. Satan, the lord of death, uses the silence of the dead to try to maximize the darkness. But the loss of knowledge through death and the forgetfulness of recycling has not been the only way the demons have tried to keep the children of Light from emerging. Their servants tried to erase even this recycling phenomenon from common knowledge. Knowledge of Truth makes us invulnerable to being deceived, and our sharing this information can capacitate you to overcome the demons’ ploys to perpetuate their slavery of mankind, keeping us ignorant of the Truth of Yâ-hwéh Yâhuwshúa` which sets us free and overcomes them in every way. Their cup of forgetfulness and their establishment’s alterations of scripture, book burning, persecutions, and slaughters will not work against the Truth in this end-time generation, the Truth they sought to be kept hidden will be shouted from the rooftops. The children of the Light are all emerging again, recycling, to survive to accomplish a mission converting millions, while the worst of the worst have been recycling to continue to work the Transgression. Recycling is not our hope, Yâhuwshúa` our Resurrection is our Hope. Time (satan & measured time) comes to an end, and immortality ends death and recycling, and Yâ-hwéh will have made all of His own come to exist, permanently. But in the meantime, during the preceding thousands of years, recycling has given people second chances at hearing this Truth of Yâ-hwéh Yâhuwshúa`. May Yâ-hwéh Yâhuwshúa` continue to be praised always and forever. your brothers in Yâ-hwéh Yâhuwshúa` Disclaimer: We do not support the use of name-substitutes for Yâ-hwéh Yâhuwshúa` nor any false doctrines contained in the references below; however, we do recognize these authors as sincere truth-seekers whom He has led to do good work and much research, helpful to expose the works of sâţâ´n keeping truths hidden. Our hope is Yâ-hwéh Yâhuwshúa` leads the ones in Truth. Helpful Sources & Links Dedicated to the Reconciliation Between Recycling and Christianity Edward Reaugh Smith The Soul’s Long Journey: How the Bible Reveals Reincarnation BiblioWeiss, M.D., Many Lives, Many Masters ( WARNING AUTHOR FAILS TO REALIZE 'MASTERS' ARE DEMONS) Strong, James, Strong’s Exhaustive Concordance of the Bible, Nelson, Nashville, 1990) Tucker M.D., Jim B. Return to Life: Extraordinary Cases of Children Who Remember Past Life The Thirteenth Apostle - What the Gospel of Judas Really Says by April D. DeConick The Gospel of Judas Translated by Rodolphe Kasser, Marvin Meyer, and Gregor Wurst, in collaboration with François Gaudard The Apocalypse of Baruch: Translated from the Syriac Francis M. Concord. Plato’s Cosmology The Timaeus of Plato Yonassan Gershom. Jewish Tales of Reincarnation Geddes MacGregor. Reincarnation in Christianity Geddes MacGregor. Reincarnation as a Christian Hope “Pistis Sophia” The Second Book of Our Savior Paul Von Ward The Soul Genome: Science and Reincarnation Quincy Howe Jr. Reincarnation for the Christian Ian Stevenson, M.D. Reincarnation and Biology https://www.near-death.com/reincarnation/research/ian-stevenson.htm [free source now defunct, buy his book] http://www.iisis.net/index.php?page=walter-semkiw-ian-stevenson-society-for-scientific-exploration-sse&hl=en_US [now locked, but we'll keep the ref here] www.carolbowman.com/library/double-birthmarks/ https://www.theepochtimes.com/a-theory-on-how-birthmarks-could-correspond-to-wounds-from-past-lives_846178.html back to top He is The Way for those who strayed, He is Knowledge for those who were ignorant, He is the Treasure for those who sought Him, He is Support for those who tremble, He is Purity for those who were defiled. He is the Light for the those in darkness, He is Yâ-hwéh Yâhuwshúa` , our Redeemer, First-Love, Brother, and True friend. Yâhú !