Report any issue with "No results found"

Yahwehyahuwshua.org is a successor website to Yahuwshua.org. We are independently researched - not following any near-miss name groups. We offer end-times predictions and free scriptures for all to help 144K to remember Him and return to The Way of Yâ-hwéh Yâhuwshúa`. The Way of Yâ-hwéh Yâhuwshúa` End times predictions ENTRA ENTER

We are the first to expose that the "lion of Judah" is not our savior. If you love our Savior, read our findings to stop worshiping satan. THE LIE : THE LION OF JUDAH The lion Discrepancies in Scriptures Mark Twain, a freemason satanist (deceiver) storyteller, said it is easier to deceive someone than persuade them they’ve been deceived. Unless Yâ-hwéh Yâhuwshúa` favors you to believe His Truth, the facts contradicting common beliefs included in this brief page may also be too difficult for you to accept and believe. Since most of those who are deceived about Him, Who He is, will not change their mind until they actually do see Him manifested for themselves, the confusion about the lion, which is clarified on this webpage, may help prepare those chosen to accept His Garment of Light Which gives understanding. Here we will expose several deceptions about lions, disproving some of the lies the establishment teaches against our Sovereign Yâhuwshúa`. Remember, all lies come from the father of lies, the adversary (satan). We encourage you to also look further into this subject and to consider the information provided here as guided by Yâhuwshúa`, and compare it with your own findings. Does the lion Become the Lamb? Nowhere in inspired scriptures, or even altered ones, about Yâhuwshúa` does it state that the Lamb became the lion. Zero scriptures are vetting any process of the lion becoming the Lamb. Nonetheless, lion-loving satanists have led many to arrive at that foul conclusion. 36 lion mentions are evil in the KJV. How could this be the Lamb, our Savior? Many have been misled this way to mistakenly worship sâțâ´n because his Establishment’s Revelation 5: 5 alone contains a deceitful and misleading mistranslation. Though 1st Century believers were well aware of the Truth, most Christians do still remember that the lions in their scriptures represent evil with this verse: "Be Sober, be vigilant because your adversary, the devil, as a roaring lion , walketh about, seeking whom he may devour." – 1 Peter 5: 8 (KJV) Typically, when people recall the "lion and the Lamb," they are taking Yshá’Yâhuw ("Isaiah") 11:6 out of context due to its mistranslation in the KJV, mostly due to abbreviation by the scribes' shorthand coding: 6 (AV) The wolf also shall dwell with the lamb, and the leopard shall lie down with the kid; and the calf and the young lion and the fatling together; and a little child shall lead them. Here is Yshá`Yâhuw (“Isaiah”) 11:6 properly LXX- decoded: “ When one overcoming the demon ( yisrâ’ë´l ) of Me shall be fed with a wolf accompanying the nobody of yisrâ’ë´l of the Lamb (m. ) of yisrâ’ë´l, then of Me , a panther shall repose together with a young male goat of yisrâ’ë´l , and a little calf (n.) of yisrâ’ë´l , and a bull (m.) of yisrâ’ë´l – though the lion (m.) [were] dictating at the same time – they shall be fed of One overcoming the demon ( yisrâ’ë´l ) , when a little Child [ be ] Who of Me shall guide the same ones (m.) [ being ] the Son of yisrâ’ë´l , ” – Yshá`Yâhuw 11:6 Yshá`Yâhuw predicted, about the end times, that when Yâhuwshúa`’s true yisrâ’ë´l will be being fed by a predator wolf accompanying the adversary, then the various spiritual species of yisrâ’ë´l will not be at war with each other, although the lion will be still dictating, when they shall be fed by the 144,000 guided by our Savior. It is apparent that the lion is the adversary who will be ignored to prefer Yâhuwshúa`. It is a time when the adversary will not win the information war. Yshá`Yâhuw 65: 25 also mentions a lion : Per the KJV (altered by shorthand coding) Isa 65:25 (AV) T he wolf and the lamb shall feed together, and the lion shall eat straw like the bullock: and dust shall be the serpent’s meat. They shall not hurt nor destroy in all my holy mountain, saith the LORD. Here is Yshá`Yâhuw (“Isaiah”) 65:25 properly LXX- decoded: “ At that time, the wolves (m.) of one overcoming the demon ( yisrâ’ë´l ) [ ~underneath ] , and the lambs (m.) [ ~144K above ] shall be fed, at the same time dictating of One overcoming the demon ( yisrâ’ë´l ) , though the lion [ ~Yehuwthâ´h ] , like the ox of Me , shall eat the chaff , but the serpent , the Yâ-hwéh [ being ] the Land in Truth , as [ being ] the Bread/Food which [ is ] of you (sing.) , they [ ~the lion and the serpent ] shall not harm , not even with the father of the sovereign (’ avadówn ) , lest they should do injury upon the one overcoming the demon ( yisrâ’ë´l ) outside [ ~widow underneath ] that [ is ] not of the ones (n./m.) belonging to the transferring mountain [~middle], not of the ones (n./m.) belonging to the Pure-One (n.) of Me , ” dictates of Me Yâ-hwéh Yâhuwshúa`.” This is a prediction of Yâhuwshúa`’s crucifixion, feeding all the species of yisrâ’ë´l, but the adversary lion only feeding on the empty husk left behind. Yet this prediction also was mentioned as relating to an event that happened when Yâhuwshúa` was two years old, which foreshadows this by natural animals also having no animosity against one another because of Him. And both these reflect Yshá`Yâhuw’s prediction, which came to pass, as documented in the book of the 'Birth of the Blessed Miryâ´m' and 'The Infancy of the Savior,' written in Hebrew by MattithYâ´huw, which was translated into Latin by Jerome, and accused by the satanists as “The Gospel of Pseudo-Matthew,” which we will restore the names/terms therein to accuracy; for the establishment rendition, please see the link. “Now the day before this was done Yâhuwçë´ph was warned in his sleep by the Envoy of Yâ-hwéh Yâhuwshúa`, Who said to him: “ Take Miryâ´m and the Child, and go into Mitsráyim (“Egypt”) by the way of the desert .” And Yâhuwçë´ph went according to the saying of the Envoy. [7] CHAP. 18.--And having come to a certain cave, and wishing to rest in it, the blessed [8] Miryâ´m dismounted from her beast, and sat down with the child Yâhuwshúa` in her bosom. And there were with Yâhuwçë´ph three boys, and with Miryâ´m a girl, going on the journey along with them. And, lo, suddenly there came forth from the cave many dragons [~Greek term for “large serpent”, or “dinosaur”] ; and when the children saw them, they cried out in great terror. Then Yâhuwshúa` went down from the bosom of His mother, and stood on His feet before the dragons; and they adored Yâhuwshúa`, and thereafter retired. Then was fulfilled that which was said by Dâwíth the prophet, saying: Praise Yâ-hwéh Yâhuwshúa` from the earth, ye dragons; ye dragons, and all ye deeps [9] And the young Child Yâhuwshúa`, walking before them, commanded them to hurt no man. But Miryâ´m and Yâhuwçë´ph were very much afraid lest the Child should be hurt by the dragons. And Yâhuwshúa` said to them: “ Do not be afraid, and do not consider Me to be a little Child; for I am and always have been perfect [~also meaning mature/complete] ; and all the beasts of the forest must needs be tame before Me. ” CHAP. 19.--Lions and panthers adored Him likewise, and accompanied them in the desert. Wherever Yâhuwçë´ph and the blessed Miryâ´m went, they went before them showing them the way, and bowing their heads; and showing their submission by wagging their tails, they adored Him with great reverence. Now at first, when Miryâ´m saw the lions and the panthers, and various kinds of wild beasts, coming about them, she was very much afraid. But the infant Yâhuwshúa` looked into her face with a joyful countenance, and said: “ Be not afraid, mother; for they come not to do thee harm, but they make haste to serve both thee and Me. ” With these words He drove all fear from her heart. And the lions kept walking with them, and with the oxen, and the asses, and the beasts of burden which carried their baggage, and did not hurt a single one of them, though they kept beside them; but they were tame among the sheep and the rams which they had brought with them from Judaea, and which they had with them. They walked among wolves, and feared nothing; and no one of them was hurt by another. Then was fulfilled that which was spoken by the prophet: “ Wolves shall feed with lambs; the lion and the ox shall eat straw together. ” [10] There were together two oxen drawing a wagon with provision for the journey, and the lions directed them in their path.” - http://www.pseudepigrapha.com/LostBooks/infancymatt.htm Compare: “ the wolves (m.) of one overcoming the demon ( yisrâ’ë´l ) [ ~underneath ] , and the lambs (m.) [ ~144K above ] shall be fed, at the same time dictating of One overcoming the demon ( yisrâ’ë´l ) , though the lion [ ~Yehuwthâ´h ] , like the ox of Me , shall eat the chaff, ” Yshá’Yâhuw predicted events that would occur before Yâhuwshúa` was born, yet the complete fulfillment of the original happened when He was crucified. Yet notice: He fulfilled the material abbreviated version satan altered, also. This was when Yâhuwshúa` was leaving for "Egypt" to avoid persecution, all these wild beasts followed with the group behind Yâhuwshúa` into Egypt, and the lions were one kind among them, representing the first-mentioned type of the four spiritual animals of yisrâ’ë´l; and this was a spiritual sign; His leading all was the royal order of precedence, as no one outranks Yâhuwshúa`, so notice the passage says in many ways (in bold type) that all of the beasts walked with the group, behind Him. But notice that the last sentence shows a contradicting alteration: "the lions directed them in their path.” We believe this to have said “protected” because the same path had robbers along the way, per other scriptures. However, notice that if it only applied to the oxen, the lions directing the oxen does go with the order of the animals in the book of Disclosure (Revelation). But alterations like this " d̶i̶r̶e̶c̶t̶e̶d " mislead many people to believe the 'lion is the Lamb', and satanist lion-worshipper scribes are the source of this idea. The most famous alteration contributing to this is their mistranslation of Revelation 5:5 , but we will prove how scholars manipulated that scripture verse to favor the lion, not the Lamb. Even rebels and thugs believe the lion became the victor over the Lamb, branding this mistake in their bodies as tattoos. You're welcome to do an online search under images for "Revelation 5:5 tattoos" to see what we mean and look at the many despicable images of a lion eating the Lamb, lion over the Lamb, lion ruling over the Lamb, lion overcoming the Lamb, etc. No matter which, the original error of mistaking, even preferring the adversary lion for our Savior, the Lamb, threatens our Exemption because Passover means Exemption, and our Savior Yâhuwshúa` is our Passover Lamb, our Exemption. The satanists reject that Exemption. The lion Overcame, not the Lamb? The confusion is large among Christians because they are correctly taught to reckon all scriptures to be inspired and dependable, yet they are handed an undependable translation of a 66-book manuscript altered by scribal shorthand. The damage is less when the scripture still retains true meaning, so all scriptures, even in their establishment one (KJV), describe the Lamb as victorious in spite of having been slaughtered, for instance: Re 17:14 These shall make war with the Lamb , and the Lamb shall overcome them : for he is Lord of lords, and King of kings: and they that are with him are called, and chosen, and faithful. Although this verse says something very different when restored, it nonetheless contains this: …The Lamb of Me , He shall win over the same ones (m.) … And knowing this to be true, how can Revelation 5: 5 be true as misrepresented by this world’s establishment “bible”? It reads: 5 (AV) And one of the elders saith unto me, Weep not: behold, the Lion of the tribe of Juda, the Root of David, hath prevailed to open the book, and to loose the seven seals thereof. Notice the KJV doesn’t even allege that the lion prevailed over the Lamb, only to open the book. But they capitalized “Lion”, something they did not do for the 1 Peter mention of the same lion being the adversary, because they identify this lion as our Savior! It says that one of the ones of Yâ-hwéh, of the elders, says, using pronouns for (subjects we identify), that: (the Lamb) Who conquered of Me is He Who has NO regard for the lion without regard for non-satanist middle yisrâ’ë´l, who are being (the impostor) who is NOT of the (spiritual) tribe of the Profession of Yâ-hwéh, being the heart (f.). She (the false heart not being the true profession of Yâ-hwéh), which is not the Root of Dâwíth , the worker of Goodness , is to open , in the middle not belonging to the ones (144K), the Scroll (The Living Scroll of the Living) of one overcoming the demon (yisrâ’ë´l) , even the ones (f.) (middle sister) not being The Fullness (f.) , (the impostor heart) being the seals of the same One (n.) (living Scroll) of the Son of yisrâ’ë´l .” But what is this “heart” that opens the living Scroll and to loose the seals? The KJV, though omitting “heart”, said it was the lion . That much is true, the lion is the false heart, the profession of the lion as being ‘Yâ-hwéh’, which the satanists teaching it to the un-full non-satanist middle sister do, to open their Scroll. But what is that “book” (scroll)? Other scriptures (The Glad Tidings of the Truth) explain that this scroll (“book”) nailed on the cross/tree of the non-satanist middle yisrâ’ë´l Christians, to claim them, is the Living Scroll of the Living , an emanation of the Son, and contains His names, and is His claim posted on them. What is this claim of ownership? Their spiritual constitution – the way they were made – to reject the mighty one of lucifer/aaron (light-carrier), once they manage to positively identify him. But the adversary, the lion , seeking to prevent them from reading it/realizing it, has sealed shut this Scroll with seven unclean seals of his own making. But in trying to unfurl their worship for the adversary impostor, “the foot”, his satanists infiltrating Christianity, they remove these unclean seals. This impostor lion, a false profession of Yâ-hwéh, is the false heart . And this false heart he is calling “Judeo-Christianity” is what is to take off those unclean seven seals off from that Living Scroll posted on non-satanist middle yisrâ’ë´l not belonging to the ones (the 144K). But in their efforts to transfer the middle non-satanists to worship their impostor lion using the false heart, when the coming one comes riding the bully-clouds (Nephilim) of his tempest (STORM) with his satanists to murder his opponents, although Christians have been told of a “Second Coming of Jesus”, the reality of the middle’s positive identification of that ‘lion of Judah’ calling himself “Jesus”, that “lion of Judah”, being satan, clashes with the non-satanist middle Christians’ very composition: they are non -satanists and have no regard for the mighty one of lucifer/aaron… whenever they manage to realize it is him. This is in their design and the “Plan” they are told to trust; their conversion to satanism failed there by degrees: their error/mistake ends, and they begin to seek the Most High elsewhere outside the lion. Thus, the Living Scroll did stake His claim. But the lion was not who conquered nor prevailed, nor is the lion Who is from the tribe of the Profession of Yâ-hwéh, though his false religion posing as our Savior does open his own unclean seals on their Living Scroll. How did the lion-worshipping satanist liars make their mistranslation of OUR scriptures be so far from the truth? Do not interpret that as a sign of weakness of the Most High, because this was worked into His plan, and He did inform us of it in many scriptures. Remember the masses, He talked to in parables because at that time, they could not handle the Truth of higher knowledge our Savior Yâhuwshúa` spoke to His 12 pupils (which included Wisdom, Miryâ´m the Migdâlâ´h, not Yehuwth â´h “Judas”). Also, ever since then, and since earlier too, the masses of the middle were given a spiritually dumbed-down scripture they could handle by the satanists, because by those unclean seals, they are sealed off from His names. By “dumbed-down,” we mean not containing the higher knowledge (gnosis) He shared with the 12 pupils. But the motivation of the satanists was greed for power, to keep them from learning His dual-names Yâ-hwéh Yâhuwshúa` and thus keep them from overcoming their god, the adversary. Even the adversary’s greed to get worshipped was used to open those seals. Here we show you how this was done in Revelation (Disclosure) 5: 5. The satanic scribal shorthand coding omitted the words in blue. Read the black bold words without the blue words, and you will see it matches what is found in the KJV, although they reorganized it, and reduced ‘conquered’ to ‘prevailed’: “Who conquered of Me [is] He Who [is] without regard for the lion [ ~sâţâ´n ] without regard for he who [is] originating from he who “I shall cause to exist of yisrâ’ë´l” , [ ~middle ] [being] the one ( n .) [ ~Yehuwthâ´h impostor ] not of the tribe (f.) of Yâhuwthâ´h (the Profession of Yâ-hwéh) [being] the heart (f.) …” KJV - “ the Lion of the tribe of Juda, the Root of David, hath prevailed… ” But when you read the restored verse with the words in blue , you will see what it originally said. Translation issues were exploited by the satanists - The establishment "bible" Post-Advent scriptures (New Testament) were translated from Koine Greek. Koine Greek is an inflected language that uses parsing to modify words and express grammatical categories such as aspect, tense, case, voice, number, gender, person, and mood. In Greek mythology and commercial sneakers, you are probably already familiar with the Greek word “Nike,” associated with flight, speed, and victory. A form of this word is used in "Revelation" 5:5, and He/Who conquered/prevailed is correctly translated. But Who/who did it? Shouldn’t it be obvious that it is the Lamb Who overcame? Since they lied and made it the lying lion , those believing the satanist-establishment’s KJV to be infallible were taken in again, Mark Twain style, and instead of correcting it, reconcile the conquering Lamb with the impostor lion to ERR, to say ‘they are the same One.’ How can one expect scripture meanings to stay intact if all those blue words are omitted? By failing to correctly identify Who overcame, due to the mistake being these important blue omitted words , when restored, the Subject of “Who conquered” is identified by “He Who is without regard for the lion.” It becomes “He Who is… the lion” without the blue words . When the omission is restored, “Who conquered” refers to the Lamb, the Most High Yâ-hwéh Yâhuwshúa`, our Savior. But the omission caused the misidentification of the Subject of the statement, the Lamb, to be mistaken for the lion instead. So accurately translating scripture missing 2/3 of its words cannot hope to retain its original meaning 100% of the time. Thus, by this one altered verse, did the adversary loser lion manage to persuade legions of gullible non-satanists for thousands of years, to errantly believe the lion must be the Lamb since they believed the lion overcame … The parsing form of this word, “ hath prevailed ” (overcame) in Revelation is: ἐνίκησεν (enikhēsen) A conjugation of Strong's word# 3528 νικάω (nikáō) – victor We share an example of this word's parsing from the Griesbach 1796 2nd Edition Translation and the Gri-05 Griesbach 1805 Manual Edition : The parsing (verb indicative aorist active 3rd person singular ) for νικάω in "Revelation 5:5" contains the pronoun 'He ,' being part of the word, and if the Greek with its omissions would have been written out, literally in the English establishment translations, it would have appeared as: “Who conquered … [is] he who [is] … the lion [ ~sâţâ´n ] … [is] He Who [is] originating from … ̶o̶f̶ ̶t̶h̶e̶ ̶o̶n̶e̶ ̶(̶f̶.) [ ~routinely omitted by the establishment ] … of the tribe (f.) of Yâhuwthâ´h (the Profession of Yâ-hwéh) …” Revelation 5: 5 (BYZClassic) … και <2532> {CONJ } εις <1520> {A-NSM } εκ <1537> {PREP } των <3588> {T-GPM } πρεσβυτερων <4245> {A-GPM } λεγει <3004> (5719) {V-PAI-3S } μοι <3427> {P-1DS } μη <3361> {PRT-N } κλαιε <2799> (5720) {V-PAM-2S } ιδου <2400> (5628) {V-2AAM-2S } ε νικησ εν <3528 > (5 656) {V-AAI-3S } ο <3588> {T-NSM } λεων <3023> {N-NSM } ο <3588> {T-NSM } εκ <1537> {PREP } της <3588> { T-GSF } φυλης <5443> {N-GSF } ιουδα <2448> {N-GSM } η <3588> {T-NSF } ριζα <4491> {N-NSF } δαυιδ <1138> {N-PRI } ανοιξαι <455> (5658) {V-AAN } το <3588> {T-ASN } βιβλιον <975> {N-ASN } και <2532> {CONJ } τας <3588> {T-APF } επτα <2033> {A-NUI } σφραγιδας <4973> {N-APF } αυτου <846> {P-GSN } Textus receptus (usado por R-V) Apo.5:5 (IGNT) και <2532> {AND } εις <1520> {ONE } εκ <1537> {OF } των <3588> {THE } πρεσβυτερων <4245> {ELDERS } λεγει <3004> (5719) {SAYS } μοι <3427> {TO ME, } μη <3361> κλαιε <2799> (5720) {DO NOT WEEP. } ιδου <2400> (5628) {BEHOLD, } ενικησεν <3528> (5656) {OVERCAME  } ο <3588> {THE} λεων <3023> {LION } ο <3588> {WHICH] ων <5607> (5752) {IS } εκ <1537> {OF} της <3588> {THE } φυλης <5443> {TRIBE} ιουδα <2448> {OF JUDAH,} η <3588> {THE } ριζα <4491> {ROOT } δαβιδ <1138> {OF DAVID, [SO AS] } ανοιξαι <455> (5658) {TO OPEN } το <3588> {THE } βιβλιον <975> {BOOK, } και <2532> {AND } λυσαι <3089> (5658) {TO LOOSE } τας <3588> {THE } επτα <2033> {SEVEN } σφραγιδας <4973> {SEALS } αυτου <846> {OF IT. } See above, below the English literal translation, the shorthand Greek manuscript copy of Revelation 5: 5, as-is, without the omissions restored. Feel free to compare them to see their accuracy. We use the Byzantine Classic manuscript which is superior in accuracy to that of the “Textus Receptus” used by the KJV. That “Textus Receptus” differs from the better Byzantine Classic later in that verse, adding the word “to loose”. Basically, the first “he who” (ο <3588> {T-NSM  }) would have been thought to be the lion, because that “he who” is in the nominative case (T-NSM  ) , making it the subject , and that would make the lion also be qualifying to be part of the spiritual tribe of Yâhuwthâ´h too, without the omitted negation of it. Yet the main culprit of the mistaken identity, or more the lionists’ identity theft , is this one omission in blue: “Who conquered … [is] He Who [is] without regard for the lion [ ~sâţâ´n ] … [is] He Who [is] originating from … o̶f̶ ̶t̶h̶e̶ ̶o̶n̶e̶ ̶(̶f̶.̶) [ ~routinely omitted by the establishment ] … of the tribe (f.) of Yâhuwth â´h (the Profession of Yâ-hwéh) … ” Because their translating an altered manuscript making the lion, sâţâ´n, appear to be the victor , it makes their audience reconcile that by suggesting he is also the Lamb . This is why they, the satanist establishment, have brought this mistranslated verse out to showcase it for their impostor, the adversary’s incarnation, ameliorating the evil lion and cleaning up his image. This way the impostor will, and has felt free to associate himself with the image of a lion. And one sees “the lion of Judah” about this impostor everywhere, not knowing this verse utterly contradicts this. In fact, satan is not included at all in all yisrâ’ë´l. But satan did not win the information war about his defeat by the Lamb on the cross resurrecting, as he could not similarly alter every other instance of the Lamb being our Savior, so instead of trying to beat Him, He tried instead to join Him by stealing His identity; this could have been prevented if the translators would not have been satanists. Because scholars had not yet figured out the satanists’ shorthand code to find those omissions, compounded by their unwillingness to stick to common sense that the Lamb prevailed and conquered, they neglected to correctly identify the Subject of Who conquered, even with the context, although because of this coding generally making Greek become nonsensical (“it’s all Greek to me” ) they have established their own method to always liberally translate their translations to force them to make sense. Greek is a complicated exact and precise language. It should not be handled that way. The reason the KJV was more accepted than others by the public was that they went to greater extremes of liberal translating to produce a scripture version that even seemed to be proper Shakespearean English. Therefore, they could have easily also liberally translated this on the side of truth. So, was this done knowingly ? In this case, see the consequences of their mistake, who benefits, and the allegiances of the establishment doing the translating, and you can know: it was done deliberately. And those middle non-satanists who knew the Lamb was the victor, did not stand up against the precedent made by the powerful establishment, continuing to make a victor also out of the lion loser . Although the word enikhēsen includes a pronoun in its meaning, they could have easily translated it liberally as they did the rest, to make the lion be an object of Who overcame by saying “Who conquered him, the lion…; without knowing the omission , but the context makes it clear. But here we speak hypothetically, about translators who may not have had the means to restore the omissions , what they should have done. But we are grateful for the increase in knowledge from Yâ-hwéh Yâhuwshúa`, Who made it possible for us to find the full restored meanings of this decoded verse, and all similarly coded scripture, to know that the Lamb is Who overcame the lion , and to know for certain just in time to utterly reject the lion lie, even some already got lion tattoos. There is a point of no return. Even the current lion -worshippers, if they are among His finite perfect number, will repent at the End and be rescued. "And one of the elders says to me, Do not weep: look! He has VICTOR-ed OVER (conquered) the lion, the One [the Lamb] being from the tribe of Yâhuwthâ´h, Who is the Root of Dâwíth, to open the scroll and to release the seven seals of it." This is Yâhuwshúa`, the first Yisrael. In English, this Hebrew word applies foremost to Yahuwshua, Who was the First to overcome the demon-lion power (Yisrael) and the ones who follow His order of Priesthood. Yet many inspired scriptures consistently prove that the Lamb is Yâhuwshúa` and that the lion is satan. The ' lion is of Judah' is not the Spiritual Tribe of Yâhuwthâ´h The omissions discussed above also mislead readers to think that lion was of the tribe of “Judah”, and we have shown the negation was omitted. So what is the tribe of “Judah”? Because this world’s definitions are not the Truth. Let us look deeper than what you can easily find online written by the sheepherders for their consumption, because there are dozens of false definitions being made because everyone wants to be this, and they find a way to claim it incorrectly without studying the term. Although "Judah" is found written everywhere the Jews have written it as “ Y_huwthâ´h ” (יְהוּדָה) but is really Yâhuwthâ´h (יָהוּדָה) in Hebrew. The original term/name is Yâhuwthâ´h , and it means the "Profession of Yâ-hwéh ." Even this correct definition of this term is not found anywhere we know of, because it comes from analyzing the context and history of how Lë`â´h named her son, in restored scripture, and who has done that? You may find what she said in 1 Moshéh in our FPS translation. Why has it been hidden? Look at who benefited from hiding it. It has been hidden by those who first had interest in hiding the importance of professing Him correctly, and by those who preferred their own definition of it as identifying themselves, and could not reconcile their censorship of professing Yâ-hwéh with their calling themselves this, so they hid the definition. First look at how the Jews have rewritten it, altering it, as “ Y_huwthâ´h ” (יְהוּדָה), instead of Yâhuwthâ´h (יָהוּדָה). The reason for the underscore (_) omitting the vowel â is that the vowel letter “shwa” they substituted there is defined as a “silence”, to censor out the name Yâhuw-, the short form of Yâ-hwéh. So if one censors out Yâ-hwéh out of this word, no more is it a profession of Yâ-hwéh. Then by default, it goes to His adversary. In the same exact way, they currently teach to insert silences as underscores in the place of vowels, in words referring to the Most High in the minds of followers of the religions they control, even if those words aren’t really His names at all. Yet they keep their censorship secret by transliterating the silence as an “e”, writing “ Yehudah ”, which more of you must have seen as a very frequent name among them and the name they call their tribal religion, but we, seeing what they actually write in Hebrew, we will transcribe it here exactly as we see it written by them, with the underscore. It is contributory and helpful also, to know that “Y_huwthâ´h” is the name satan gave himself , as the impostor to come to impersonate our Savior. In fact, the fall of mankind was because the adversary within the serpent told this term to the dirt-man ("Adam"), who switched to it, and causing-life ("Eve") was deceived to believe this lie. They had known that the Fruit on the Tree/cross is Yâhuwshúa`, Who is the true Profession of Yâ-hwéh (Yâhuwthâ´h). But this lie “y_huwthâ´h” was the rotten fruit they ingested instead – not an "apple" or any other material fruit. Before you look that up in your KJV’s Genesis, know that suffered from their scribal omission code too. Shouldn’t we be informed? Who benefited from our not knowing? The satanists who wanted to keep non-satanists under their authority. Y_huwthâ´h was also the name used by “Judas” (who turned in our Savior to the authorities of this world), and the same name used by Jews to call themselves, Judah – and is the personhood (incarnation) of sâțâ´n and his chosen tribe. The cause of the fall of mankind is the exact error that many believe in today, the error of thinking that the ‘ lion of Judah ’ is the Lamb. Identity theft. Y_huwthâ´h (“Judas”) even hung himself on a tree also, albeit with a rope, to falsely imitate our Savior Yâhuwshúa`, but the lion did not get the Anastasis – the Standing in the middle – and never will have Standing in the sight of the Most High. That Greek term is mistranslated as “resurrection”, which is simply material coming back to life in the same body. The adversary, whose incarnation was this Y_huwthâ´h (“Judas”) he announced while in the serpent, has come back to life though not in the same dirt-body, in a similar one, as his antichrist impostor incarnation. Though reincarnation is not resurrection, it is the way satan alleges eternal life, so he has also made a cross-like image to represent that, the Ankh: the combination of a womb and the male organ. Identity theft; the shallow fall for it. Are there Royal lions ? The royals of the Most High are spiritually winged-creatures, not lions, and are His 144,000 children, who have acknowledged Him by His dual-names. But this is hardly ever heard, if at all. Whenever these, the royalty is mentioned in scripture, they translated it as the alternate translation: “kingdom”. But when the world hears of the “royals” of this world, who are instead determined by bloodlines and DNA material ancestry, their entire context is filled with lions, everywhere, even in their architecture. Why? Because they serve the lion, and thus they needed to clean up the lion’s bad image as you saw above. Didn’t you ever wonder why there are lions, not the Lamb, in the British royals' heraldry? The royals of this world are spiritual reptiles claiming to be the continuation of the bloodline of the kings of "Judah," (taking a detour through Teatifi) using mocking Lions in their heraldry because their self-serving KJV "Genesis" 49 customized mistranslation also makes Judah be lions. Bloodlines of material carnal ancestry are the methods of the adversary, not the Most High, but ev en currently, the British royal bloodline is known to be extremely corrupted and disqualifying, in order to introduce the adversary’s antichrist incarnation as the one they will cede to, by design and even prediction in their scripture. Guess who is the lion in this crest? answer The Winged-Creatures "Phoenixes" vs the lions (aryans) First let us disclaim any racial implications of this, although it is known that the adversary has a preference for the blond blue-eyed look for himself, thinking to look impressive. The four spiritual animals (living-creatures KJV) of yisrâ’ë´l are, in order of mention, are also in order of their descent into the darkness: 1 - lionlike (aryans) – The satanists, the elite of this world 2 - catlike (beast of burden, Christians) 3 - dirt-manlike (heathens) 4 - winged-creatures 'eaglelike' – the children of the Most High, to be disclosed (in sh’ówl), the chosen 144,000 All four are of one overcoming the demon (yisrâ’ë´l), and they are being returned up, restored to the Light in the reverse order. Therefore, the first will be last, and the last will be first . Is the lion our Savior? The following video presentation is dedicated to the middle Christian sister. Take note that even in non-decoded scriptures verses, the Lamb, Yâhuwshúa`, is our Savior, not the lion . Yâhuwshúa` our true Savior, is identified to be the Lamb . Our “Passover” Lamb, our Exemption from death. All who accept Him pertaining to Him either were Redeemed, or will be Ransomed from death, not merely the death of these temporary dirt bodies. So He was slaughtered yet He lives, and is putting into effect all the Work He did. And all those refusing the Lamb, the satanists, do not get that Exemption, they die at the end, and are rescued from death. And by His Work He overcame the lion adversary who had swallowed us all, but was overcome by the Lamb. But what is the lion ? We have identified him as the adversary, but little is taught about the horrific nature of this villain, to accommodate the establishment’s equating the lion to the Lamb. In all inspired scriptures, satan, the hideous lion, is the one who beats and harms us; the lion is the tyrant, the adversary, and the king of this material world. It is also written that a collection of lamentations was dedicated to our Yâ-hwéh, the Father of the Lights, by one of His spiritual emanations which descended into this darkness due to being deceived by the lion beast. Her recorded words, are known as the "Psalms," and were done in her tears of repentance. The accuser (diabolous in Greek, from which comes “devil”) being the one that goes by many names because he was not named at all by our Father, being the spawn of shame (yaldabaoth); an abandoned, aborted fetus who was not fathered nor consented to by Yâ-hwéh Yâhuwshúa`. In order to come to exist of one overcoming the demon, yisrâ’ë´l, the ones being restored to Yâ-hwéh Yâhuwshúa`, happens when He calls one by the name He has given to them, then these in turn will acknowledge Him in return and come into existence (everlasting life). But the fact that the adversary is illegitimate, a bastard (mamzër), means the its time remaining is limited. So it has thus taken many names, and one of these many titles the lion goes by is gâd-ariy’ë´l ("gadariel"). Gâd ("god") means the same as a daemon in Greek, fortune-distributor, and is the specific name of an idol worshipped by Bâvél. We will analyze it below. God + ariel = Gadariel We just said above that Gâd (“God”) means the same as daemon in Greek: fortune-distributor, and is the specific name of an idol worshipped by Bâvél. But your establishment “Holy Bible” is full of it, as referring to the Most High, where would you go to find verification of this? You have to go to the Hebrew scriptures to find it, and check the LXX Septuagint translation of the earlier original, as restored, to find what it truly said. Here: Yshá`Yâhuw (“Isaiah”) 65:11 – Restored per morphologically analyzed Septuagint: “ However, ye of Yâ-hwéh not the ones, are the ones (m.) deserting Me within, to send Me away of yisrâ’ë´l, and the ones (m.) having neglected belonging to the ones not being the transferring mountain belonging to the ones (m. ) not being pure of Me, though of one overcoming the demon ( yisrâ’ë´l ) . The ones (m.) preparing the strength, not of the ones (m.) , are pertaining to the “ God ” (גַּד (daimoni) Fortune-distributor) 20 [ ~ ‘twin tens’/ ‘twin riches’ ] to adhere to a food-menu of yisrâ’ë´l, also the ones (m.) supplying the one (f.) [ ~sister ] not with the fortune (f.) , being the poured-out drink [ ~libation ] ” But the reason we brought this verse here is to point out that the satanists are pertaining to “God” (Fortune-distributor) in their worship, and while enjoying the fortune, and handing over the middle sister to be poured out as a drink offering though not supplying them the fortune. “God” means demon, and in LXX it has daimoni there. So satanists know who they are talking about when they say “God” though Christians are mistakenly saying the same term while pertaining to the Most High in their minds. Ask a satanist freemason and he’ll tell you “God” is the letter “G” shown on the Masonic symbol, to enjoy the approval of the deceived Christians. Depending on their audience they will also allege that G letter means "great architect," "geometry," and also "god," all still pointing to satan. But we know definitively, that is short for “Gadariel”, because that G is interchangeable with a lion’s head. Why would this mean it’s “Gadariel”? We explain: "That same instant I stood up, I saw a great angel before me; his hair was spread out like a lioness. His teeth were outside of his mouth like a bear. His hair was spread out like a women's. His body was like a serpent's when he wished to swallow me. And when I saw him, I was afraid." – (Apocryphal) TsphanYâ´hu 6:8 As seen in the quoted restored reference Yshá`Yâhuw 65: 11, the fortune-distributor, “God”, being worshipped by those about to pour out the middle sister as a libation, is the adversary, so he, satan, actually does get called "God”. This is the first part of “Gadariel”, and ariy’ë´l ("Ariel") means "lion of the demonic-power (’ël)” in `Ivríyth "Hebrew." It is found in Strong's Concordance Hebrew lexicon entry #739, and ’aríy being “lion” in #738. Therefore “Gadariel”, the 'G' in the satanic freemason symbol, means “Demon-lion of the demonic-power”. No wonder freemasons shush each other to not tell what that 'G' means, or the lion-head. What they worship is an embarrassment. Yshá`Yâhuw (“Isaiah”) 29:1-7 mentions ’ariy’ë´l, the lion of the demonic-power, as the part of the spiritual City of Yâ-hwéh Yâhuwshúa`, which erred the Beloved One, the Worker of Goodness, and fought. When the non-satanist middle is ‘being’ the impostor, having his false heart, they are being this one, ’ariy’ë´l, and this helps explain this passage in scriptures. It is about the Christians and non-satanist middle, and what is to happen with the ones above and the satanists underneath. It is only understood correctly when restored. This passage is amazing and pertinent and we strongly recommend reading it as restored, from FPS, downloadable from this website. However, to hide this passage and its meanings from everybody, the adversary made material analogues in the geographical area of his analogue Yisrâ’ë´l, for everything scripture mentions, to create historical events in our distant past, so that people who see the altered scriptures would associate it with ancient historical events instead of our future. Reading any worldly scholar’s interpretation of this passage will tell you of Moab being the biological grandson of Lot, fathered by his mother’s own biological father Lot, explaining the name Moab being “from his own father”, and Moab thus being a biological tribe of people in antiquity. So, they would call that Moab analogue, ’ariy’ë´l’s people, as if that prophecy is fulfilled completely and ignorable, problem solved, keep walking. Thus also, the name of the capital of Moab, Rabbath Moab, was also called Areopolis (lion city) , although ’ariy’ë´l’s city is currently satanist Jerusalem, and stands to try to recruit the transferring mountain of ‘Judeo-Christianity’. But in spiritual reality, as the Christian non-satanist middle yisrâ’ë´l sister has the inability to have regard for Yâ-hwéh Yâhuwshúa`, their Christianity also becomes the errant part of the City which currently is of the lion of the demonic-power, ’ariy’ë´l, sâţâ´n, until they might come to exist, acknowledging Yâ-hwéh Yâhuwshúa` after the selection/separation. More About Gadariel , Outside the Establishment's Canon Many have written about Gâd-’ariy’ë´l ("Gadariel"), giving further clues they knew it was another title for sâţâ´n: The higher-knowledge "gnostic" codices found in the Nag Hammadi Library say G'dariy'ë ´l is a "craftsman" ("lower creator"/"architect") – A "demiurge" means a craftsman. Not the Inventor of a new form but the imposer of pre-existing forms and formless materials. This is a reference to the adversary. The Hypostasis (Substance) of the Archons : In Not in His image , John Lash describes the maker of this material chaos by quoting the Berlin codex as "having a lion-like [body] with the head of a drakona, a reptile." “…When foolish Wisdom desired to cause the thing that had no spirit to be formed into a likeness and to rule over matter and over all her forces, there appeared for the first time a ruler, out of the waters, lion-like in appearance, androgynous, having great authority within him, and ignorant of whence he had come into being." Heinrich Cornelius Agrippa said, in his book Of Occult Philosophy, Book III (part 3) , "Ariel is the name of an angel, and is the same as the lion of god (fortune); sometimes also it is the name of an evil Demon, and of a City which is thence called Ariopolis, where the Idol Ariel was worshipped." Easton's Bible Dictionary defines Ariel as "the lion of God." Easton adds that Ariel is a "symbolic name for Jerusalem." ’ariy’ë´l is called both a prince who rules the waters and "earth's great lord" "A wielder of the fire of gold" - a lion-headed deity or demon with power over the Earth." Isn’t it sinister how the adversary also twisted the meaning of this lion to seem good? ’ël which means demonic-power became “God”, which is accepted by establishment Christianity as pertaining to the Most High. However, some misleading transliterations of Gâd-’ariy’ë´l appear in scripture translations and commentary: The blue letter bible lexicon says Gadreel, Gaderel (in Heb. גדר האל "gader ha-ël," literally "wall of God ") (or G'adri'el) – are detours away from the Truth, derived from "gader": to wall up or off, to build a wall - Pronunciation gä·dār' (Key) גָּדֵר It seems these desperately wanted to dissociate “God” from “Gadariel”, since the Strong’s Concordance’s Hebrew Lexicon exposed that term in their entries #1408/1409, to try to clean up the image of the adversary. Whenever anyone abandons Yâhuwshúa`, Who is Yâ-hwéh, to follow after the lion (the things of this world), the lion devours this person, and then he becomes part of the separated city of the lion of the demonic-power, ’ariy’ë´l . Believe in the Lamb , for He is Who overcame, and He is our Sovereign and our Savior Yâ-hwéh Yâhuwshúa`, so abandon the liar loser lion who He overcame. Are You Still Believing that the lion is the Lamb? back to top "I have come in my Father's name [ Yâ-hwéh Yâhuwshúa` ] , and you do not accept Me; but if someone else comes in his own name, you will accept him." - Yâhuwchânâ´n "John" 5:43

These are lost scriptures discarded from the canon of self-proclaimed contemporary Christian establishments. WHO WERE THE GNOSTICS? Knowledge – Strong's Greek: 1108. γνῶσις (gnósis) This article aims to help the investigating reader understand the primary scriptural proofs and question the alleged historical evidence that the "contemporary scholars," repeatedly present to their audience to discredit the writings of the 1st Century believers. These are lost scriptures discarded from the canon of the contemporaneous self-appointed Christian establishments. A believing-inspired student of these scriptures will need to reason with the Mind to comprehend the spiritual meanings of these scriptures frequently poorly translated by paid laborers. To do so, one will also have to research the Greek terms that scholars left untranslated, even confronting foreign expressions, and difficulty arises when ascertaining their meaning and intent. In interpreting His profound letters, it is essential to understand the literary and linguistic styles of the original writers and the developmental, factual, and historical elements of the generation in which they were written. If we do not take a moment to consider and examine them, we can misappropriate their purpose and intended audiences. The Firm entrusts these paid laborers with these tasks: to translate the scriptures ("codices") found in Egypt, determine their authenticity, and actuate their ages–determined by " educated guesses" influenced by the Irenaeus-curse. Paid laborers often morph the relevancy of these writings with modern applications according to current doctrines, misinterpreting them then rejecting the manuscript written. When they try to do so, nonbeliever paid laborers of the establishment will default to applying their guided misinterpretation to their standard translation method. Even by canonical authors – which explain why one finds these 1st Century writings of believers with titles given by the paid laborers, cursing them as false, as "Pseudoepigrapha" – and directly denying the authors reporting them to have written them in their language. After denying their author and validation, these scholars next miscalculate dates for these and publish them with copyrights in the hope of preventing its future vindication as genuine. Lost in the process of their eliminating scriptures which they disapprove, is a lack of appreciation for Yâ-hwéh Yâhuwshúa's love for His recycling people with higher knowledge He gives, which the modern Christian, centuries later, has no intimate connection. Before explaining the controversy, to simply answer the question, a "gnostic " is a derogatory term for a first-century true follower of Yâ-hwéh Yâhuwshúa.` Today, whoever searches the establishment to answer this question finds institutions of paid laborers , the "contemporary scholars," as mentioned previously of trained-tamed pupils of the establishments' doctrines misunderstandings. These are the legacy of the enemies of the "early church," struggling to answer the curious question of Gnosticism—still maligning it as satanist, just as the satanist "church fathers" did. Even the rubric "Gnosticism" is a misnomer , as it is a modern term that present time scholars have invented rather than defining' a historical event. The "Gnostics" were the early groups of believers, being the thousands of followers of Yâhuwshúa`, whom the satanic establishment's "Church Fathers" ("the Firm") and today's paid laborers ("contemporary scholars") slandered as being deviant or heretical, with the sobriquet "know it all" – slandering them as 'Gnostics.' In the ancient world, first-century believers who acknowledged Truth ("Gnostics") represented a form of belief that had exposed the satanism in "Judaism" and "the Firm" and their falsehoods. Because the followers of Yâhuwshúa` had a much clearer understanding of Yâhuwshúa` 's instructions which they received in person from His mouth; they passed along verbally the Testimony of Yâ-hwéh Yâhuwshúa`, and inspired by the Spirit, and possessed the Mind of the Anointed. They learned how to crucify the flesh and denounce worldly things and thus yearned for more spiritual food or knowledge. To avoid early persecution by "the Firm," they gathered in secret places, at times at each other's home, apart from the synagogues. His believers shared and wrote wisdom far beyond the comprehension of the archons (demons aka e xtraterrestrials) and their followers, the Jews or those still being called "Christians" who had lost the knowledge of His names because of Jewish censorship or satanist accusations of "Judaizing." In the same way, as the archons envied the initially inspired dirt-man ("adam"), whose wisdom they could not comprehend, so too the archon-led dedicated themselves to casting down whoever has the Spirit. Thus the Jews and those still being called "Christians" who lost His names also envied and hated and murdered the "Gnostics" they could not understand and wrote slander about them, which is the surviving epigraphic historical record. Most of the inspired writings of the early believers in Yâhuwshúa` were destroyed by these archon authorities, so Yâhuwshúa` was Who led them to store their inspired writings on papyrus and bury them in jars, time-capsules for the unshakeable generation to come today to receive them, who by selection equipped with His true names, thus the Spirit and His will to restore them and comprehend the higher knowledge (gnosis) within them. Therefore, the ones He meant to have this knowledge are not dissuaded by His enemies' slander against these writings, modern and ancient. The latter paint themselves as legitimate followers to the masses, just as they did back then. The accounts of the suppression of these alternative scriptures read like an adventure novel – book burnings, secret meetings – of small groups found out by the "authorities," exiles, executions, and persecutions. Every TRUE believer in Yâhuwshúa` knew and knows that the end-result of their path on The Way is physical persecution (death), once our mission is complete, and that their written witnessed accounts of what they see or ever experienced with Yâhuwshúa,` then or now, receives the same awful treatment. The most extensive suppression of early Christian literature began when Constantine became emperor of Rome. Constantine declared a coded, modified, watered-down version of the Truth to be the approved religion for the decaying Roman Empire. Today, we know it as Christianity, the impure religion they amalgamated with satanic solar-worship and various idols in the process of conversion that occurred over several years, from his initial victory in 312 A.D. to the final defeat of rivals (True believers) in 324 A.D. In 325 A. D., Constantine convened the Council of Nicaea to decide from a selection of scriptures to form the 'canonical books.' They eliminated scriptures which they would suppress and approved others that would become the standards of the establishment's Church, which later was usurped by the Roman Catholic Church. For many years the Council attacked the inspired scriptures they disapproved. Indeed, even bishops at the Council of Nicaea who disagreed with Constantine's choices were exiled on the spot. One such example is Origen, a bishop of Rome, who wrote compelling interpretations of what he received as Truth, possibly from believers, at that time. However, the suppression of the inspired scriptures was unsuccessful as we know some texts have survived and passed on since ancient times. Many scraps and fragments turned up in various places over the years, though hardly a significant number and the Irenaeus' curse surfaced along with them. So, today's establishment followers, upon finding satanic Irenaeus' commentary slandering these inspired scriptures, instead of thinking for themselves, continued the slander, further proving their satanism. Another way the adversary smears the first-century followers of Yâ-hwéh Yâhuwshúa` which the authorities of this world calls "Gnostics," is by accusing them of being satanists. The adversary arranged for his own Firm, the contemporary Jewish scholars, who do not believe in the Testimony nor His names, who do not have His Spirit nor access to His Mind, to be the very first to obtain access to the manuscripts of these "Gnostics," so they might translate them poorly and hide the higher knowledge from most readers. Then the adversary brought his weakest followers to study these poor translations and completely misunderstand them to become dedicated satanists, calling themselves "Gnostics." This made "Gnosticism" become synonymous with "satanism" in the world's eyes to discourage any further study of these scriptures by believers. They made things much worse for prospective Christians examining their poor translations by adding their own very wrong illustrations of their interpretations when no such images existed in the original manuscripts. Their archon-level of understanding of various satanic religions misled them to assign similar satanic imagery from those religions to the actual spiritual concepts in the codices. With their mistranslations, imagery, and confusion, these self-proclaimed modern-day "Gnostics," being satanists, smear the misunderstood inspired authors of the codices and scriptures, falsely, as being satanic. Another hurdle Christians find challenging to overcome is reconciling the differences in the accounts in the inspired "gnostic" writings compared to that of the establishment's canon of scriptures. All inspired scripture agrees, and this is the case when comparing "gnostic" writings when adequately translated, to all canonical scriptures, when decoded and adequately translated. However, neither has been fully restored and published for public access. The general public is only being given the satanic establishment's approved versions. The best earlier manuscripts are jealously guarded, frequently as private stash, from their access by the elite satanic scholars, frequently Jewish. The satanists have long known and practiced the strategy that they become their opposition to control their opposition. So by eliminating the true Testimony of Yâ-hwéh Yâhuwshúa` from the writings and oral transmission through these persecutions and book-burnings, they established their satanic terms to be used in their version of the Christian religion. Moreover, they positioned themselves comfortably in its leadership positions, collecting power and authority to themselves, inventing positions beyond the acceptable "elder" and "attendant," such as "bishop" (supervisor/overseer) and "father" and "priest," all of which belong to Yâ-hwéh Yâhuwshúa`, not us. With these usurped authority positions, they misled the majority. They held them mainly controlled until the "Protestant Reformation," when they were mainly freed to scatter and pasture themselves for 500 years, from 1521 to 2021. However, in the 1st and 2nd centuries, Christianity's beginnings were not controlled by a material structure, "church," or a single hierarchy, or a single body. 1st-century believers, the "gnostics," having similar freedom before the later self-appointed satanic authorities, faced similar divisions (or denominations) in their beliefs as we do today within the Body of our Anointed. This explains why a few surviving writings of theirs are not inspired. Most of the "gnostic" writings latter copies that survive have apparently had the names of Yâ-hwéh Yâhuwshúa` omitted. So to know which are truly inspired requires deeper understanding to which contemporary scholars are not privy, as they also do not profess His names, thus not having His Spirit nor Mind, thus not being able to comprehend the higher knowledge over their archon-level. Modern Christians also would agree and name at least two or more Christian denominations today as cults and are nothing more than false Christians who deny one or more of the essentials of the Christian faith. Paulus admitted some were preaching the glad tidings 'not purely' and gave praise even for knowing the plan and purpose. However, satanism instead uniformly seeks to kill off its opponents, all varieties of Christianity, especially ones closest to the Truth, with their writings, before they overcome satan with the true Testimony and are out of their reach. This is why satanists had to eliminate the Testimony from the "Gnostics" before they became vulnerable to their authority. Any religion killing is satanist since death is a tool of the adversary. This is why some members from the satanic Firm, such as Irenaeus, silenced dissident voices because those did not endorse the kind of "Christianity" that was their own misled view of "truth." The satanic Firm that created the Roman Catholic Church also teaches that all other Christian denominations are not true churches; an unauthentic assembly viewed as suffering from 'defects.' So as you see, "Heresy" is defined as incorrect thinking and practice, and "orthodoxy" (straight-preference) is appropriate thinking and practice, terms first coined by Irenaeus and both are relative. Who was "orthodox" or a "heretic" depended upon where the observer was standing. Generally, to mainstream or apostolic Christian, one of their own is considered conventional ("orthodox"), and everyone else is a heretic. To the satanic Judaism, their secretive Talmud similarly defines everyone not Jewish, as heathens, and it is legal for them to kill at their will. Anyone in modern times joining in on the Irenaeus bandwagon of bashing "Gnosticism" in its purer form, of the first-century believers in Yâ-hwéh Yâhuwshúa`, is joining the adversary in slandering the true believers in Him. "Run! Run from the paid laborers of satan who require you to "help" support their mission through monetary donations, offerings, or by purchasing scripture translations, books, or full access to their content, all in the name of increasing your knowledge. A loyal servant of our Savior gladly assists honest seekers of the Truth in finding Him, and because Yâ-hwéh Yâhuwshúa` provides for us, the information we offer is free.

The most frequent questions we encounter as believers in the Truth this world cannot handle. FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS

H Strong's # 05315 - Animal is a Néphesh ("soul") H Strong's # 05315 - Néphesh

Uncover codices terminology from first-century believers, what Yâ-hwéh Yâhuwshúa` taught untranslated by scholars. Gnostic Glossary Understanding Gnostic Scriptures Codices BACK TO TOP Helpful Sources & Links (not cited in glossary): T. Desmond Alexander (Editor), David W. Baker Dictionary of the Old Testament: Pentateuch: A Compendium of Contemporary David Lyle Jeffrey, A Dictionary of Biblical Tradition in English Literature Gesenius Thesaurus PhiloCriticoVT. Lat.ed.1835. LexHebChaldOTS. Tregelles.1857.4vols. Flavius Josephus of the Antiquities of the Jews The Hebrew Word הממך and the Root d-m-m I ("To Be Silent") Ha’adam: Adam, man or human - The Importance of Interpretation in Biblical Translation - A pro-graduate thesis page 26 The Hebraic-Roots Version Scriptures - Revised Edition Containing The Tanak and Ketuvim Netzarim An Original Translation Made Directly from Ancient Hebrew and Aramaic Sources https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/87cb/c4dd0d085aa76b1b4f88676c5de08a70b30f.pdf https://d.iogen.es/d/ http://www.abarim-publications.com/Meaning/Adam.html https://www.jstor.org/stable/1454236?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents http://www.perseus.tufts.edu/hopper/resolveform http://stephanus.tlg.uci.edu/lsj/#eid=1&context=lsj https://www.laparola.net/greco/ http://archimedes.fas.harvard.edu/pollux/ https://www.ibiblio.org/bgreek/resources/abbott-smith.html http://www.newadvent.org/cathen/01129a.htm https://drmsh.com/adam-adam/ http://gnosis.org/naghamm/nhl.html https://www.behindthename.com/name/adam https://margmowczko.com/human-man-woman-genesis-2/ MATTER DOES NOT MATTER; ONLY YÂ-HWÉH YÂHUWSHÚA` ’S REALITY MATTERS

Interlinear View for Reincarnation Hebrews 27 The way the KJV (in green font) is worded in its translation appears to support their contention, examine it in context: 24 For Christ is not entered into the holy places made with hands, which are the figures of the true; but into heaven itself, now to appear in the presence of God for us: 25 Nor yet that he should offer himself often, as the high priest entereth into the holy place every year with blood of others; 26 For then must he often have suffered since the foundation of the world: but now once in the end of the world hath he appeared to put away sin by the sacrifice of himself. 27 And as it is appointed unto men once to die, but after this the judgment: 28 So Christ was once offered to bear the sins of many; and unto them that look for him shall he appear the second time without sin unto salvation. (emphasis added) Since the English flows, by design, readers assume there are no conflicts in its translation and fail to suspect any problem. But this is far from the truth. But even a layperson, using a good concordance and applying the principle of the importance of the broader context to the proper interpretation of a passage, quickly discovers that the correct translation and interpretation are as follows: First, there’s the standard wrong nomenclature: “God” means Fortune-distributor in Hebrew, and it means the same as “Demon” does in Greek. Christ is a transliteration of a Greek term meaning “Greased one” trying to say Anointed One in English. “holy” is derived from “hëylë´l,” which means foolish boaster in Hebrew, and refers to the “day-star” and appears as “Lucifer” in the KJV. “Sacrifice” means offering to “sakra,” which is another name used to worship the “day-star.” Second, correcting for those, when one looks under the hood at what they did with the Greek, it becomes apparent that the translators did NOT translate it accurately into English, nor in a logical way. They translated it into something that could FIT with their beliefs. To begin to examine and proofread their KJV, we put here the same verses in Greek, with their Strong’s numbers and parsing. When translating, each term has a range of possible meanings, and the correct meaning is chosen by the context and using logic, which means resonance with the Truth . With this Greek, we include the English meaning of each term, according to the parsing, which is easily verifiable looking it up in lexicons such as that in the Strong’s concordance. We put the KJV’s most important wrongly translated terms in green font here, and explain between each verse what is wrong with the KJV and why. 24 (BYZ) ου <3756> {PRT-N } γαρ <1063> {CONJ } (because not) εις <1519> {PREP } (into) χειροποιητα <5499> {A-APN } (handmade) αγια <40> {A-APN } (“pure places”) εισηλθεν <1525> (5627) {V-2AAI-3S )  (did enter) ο <3588> {T-NSM } (He Who [is]) χριστος <5547> {N-NSM } (the Anointed One) αντιτυπα <499> {A-APN } (counterparts) των <3588> {T-GPN } (of the ones) αληθινων <228> {A-GPN } (of the true ones) αλλ <235> {CONJ } (rather) εις <1519> {PREP } (into) αυτον <846> {P-ASM } (the same one [being]) τον <3588> {T-ASM } (the One [being]) ουρανον <3772> {N-ASM } (heaven) νυν <3568> {ADV } (now) εμφανισθηναι <1718> (5683) {V-APN } (to manifest Himself) τω <3588> {T-DSN } (with the One) {omitted} προσωπω <4383> {N-DSN } (with the external appearance) {in the presence} του <3588> {T-GSM } (of the One) θεου <2316> {N-GSM } (of the Power) υπερ <5228> {PREP } (on behalf) ημων <1473> {P-1GP } (of us,) “ In the presence of God ” vs. “with the One with the external appearance of the One of the Power ” – There is no word “in” in the Greek here, it is not in the dative case either. The dative case is used like translating the Hebrew preposition ל, but “in” is ב. And Strong’s #4383 lexicons definitions do not include the meaning “presence.” The omission of the rest of the phrase, combined with these mistranslations deny the meaning that Yâhuwshúa` IS Yâ-hwéh because He is the Personhood being the Sovereign within Yâ-hwéh and the Power is His own Greatness. KJV changes the meaning to Him merely entering a place where “God” is, a plausibly separate person, and in fact, being a real term for the adversary. 25 (BYZ) ουδ <3761> {CONJ-N } (but not) ινα <2443> {CONJ } (in order that) πολλακις <4178> {ADV } (frequently) προσφερη <4374> (5725) {V-PAS-3S } (He should bring) {he should offer} εαυτον <1438> {F-3ASM } (Himself) ωσπερ <5618> {ADV } (as however much) ο <3588> {T-NSM } (he who [is]) αρχιερευς <749> {N-NSM } (the high priest) εισερχεται <1525> (5736) {V-PNI-3S } (enters) εις <1519> {PREP } (into) τα <3588> {T-APN } (the ones [being]) αγια <40> {A-APN } (“pure places”) {holy place} κατ <2596> {PREP } (according to) ενιαυτον <1763> {N-ASM } (the year) εν <1722> {PREP } (within) {omitted} αιματι <129> {N-DSN } (with the bloodshed) {with blood} αλλοτριω <245> {A-DSN } (belonging to another) {of others} “ he should offer ” vs. “He should bring” Himself – KJV chose to translate Strong’s #4374 as “offer” and not “bring” thinking Yâhuwshúa` had Himself killed as an offering to the Father. This is wrong, Yâhuwshúa` had His dirt-body killed as a RANSOM for sâţâ´n, not for the Father. “ with blood of others ” vs. “with the bloodshed belonging to another” – “blood” in both Hebrew and Greek also means “bloodshed.” And notice how KJV makes plural “others,” without any basis. The case is dative, not genitive, so “of” is wrong, also. KJV could not explain the fact that bloodshed belongs to the adversary, one, not plural, information coded away in 1 Moshéh ( Genesis ) 9: 4-5 and 2 Moshéh ( Exodus ) 20: 13. “ holy place ” vs. “pure places” – Besides the fact that “holy” is a hëylë´l derivative invoking the day-star of the adversary, the foolish boaster, notice the KJV makes this singular baselessly when this is plural. The reason it’s supposed to be plural is because since every chosen one of Yisrâ’ë´l is made with a separate place within reserved for Him, Yâhuwshúa`’s emanation, to indwell, making us His living temples (“capacitors” is what the Hebrew term for “temple” means), we are plural, not singular. Every material so-called temple building made by hands is for the adversary, not inhabited by Yâ-hwéh Yâhuwshúa`. 26 (BYZ) επει <1893> {CONJ } (since then) εδει <1163> (5707) {V-IAI-3S } (it would have been necessary for) αυτον <846> {P-ASM } (Him) πολλακις <4178> {ADV } (frequently) παθειν <3958> (5629) {V-2AAN } (to suffer) απο <575> {PREP } (from) καταβολης <2602> {N-GSF } (of the foundation) κοσμου <2889> {N-GSM } (of the material universe) νυν <3568> {ADV } δε <1161> {CONJ } (but now) απαξ <530> {ADV } (once only) επι <1909> {PREP } (over) {in} συντελεια <4930> {N-DSF } (the completion) {the end} των <3588> {T-GPM } (of the Ones) {omitted} αιωνων <165> {N-GPM } (of the eternal ones) {of the world} εις <1519> {PREP } (for) αθετησιν <115> {N-ASF } (the abolition) αμαρτιας <266> {N-GSF } (of the error) {sin} δια <1223> {PREP } (by means of) της <3588> {T-GSF } (one’s) {omitted} θυσιας <2378> {N-GSF } (of the slaughter) {the sacrifice} αυτου <846> {P-GSM } (of the same One) {of himself} πεφανερωται <5319> (5769) {V-RPI-3S } (He has been made manifest) {he appeared [put too early in sentence] } “ in the end of the world ” vs. “over the completion of the Ones of the eternal ones” – KJV interpreted the Greek to express the TIME when He appeared to “sacrifice himself”, when Strong’s #1909 epi does not mean “in” nor “during”, and though it can mean “at”, note that Yâhuwshúa` was crucified in the year 4000 out of 7000 total years allotted for this material universe, and 4000 is hardly “ the end of the world ”. Strong’s #4930 means either completion or consummation, and not “end”. But since Strong’s #165 is referring to “the eternal ones”, not “the ages” (a mistranslation of the same Hebrew term), the purpose of Yâhuwshúa`’s Work on the cross was the completion not the consummation of these eternal ones, His chosen. But KJV went farther and interpreted “the ages” as “the world” when adding the stretched meaning of “ the end of the world ”. “ sin ” vs. “of the error” – Strong’s #266 means error/mistake, “sin” is a neologism highly laden with tradition, and the error/mistake meaning is lost. It being singular here in the Greek, and “sin” being implied to be plural is a mistake for the KJV. And KJV did not understand that the error is the adversary himself, as an error made by his mother, Wisdom, without the Father. Yâhuwchânâ´n’s Glad Tidings (“ John ”) 12: 31 says Yâhuwshúa` declared then to be “ …a Judgment trial of this world: now the ruler ( archon ) of this world shall be ejected out. ” This consequence was delayed by the adversary begging for a delay in paying what he owes, so this event is scheduled later in the 7000 years. “ by the sacrifice of himself ” vs. “by means of the one’s slaughter of the same One” – the omission of translating Strong’s #3588 “one’s”, KJV makes Yâhuwshúa`’s slaughter to be a suicide. Since we saw in verse 25 that it is sâţâ´n to whom bloodshed belongs, and scripture explains that Yehuwthâ´h/sâţâ´n was who murdered Yâhuwshúa` without justification because He did nothing wrong, removing sâţâ´n from the statement is wrong. “ he appeared ” [at the beginning of the sentence] vs. “He has been made manifest” – KJV makes Yâhuwshúa` appear in order “ to put away sin ”. This makes little if any sense. The scripture is saying that “by means of the adversary’s slaughter of Yâhuwshúa`, He has been made manifest.” How? Because His mortal dirt-body was given up for Him to be made manifest to be Who He really is, How He really is. Not merely to “put away sin”. The abolition of the error is to make possible the completion of the eternal ones, the chosen ones, because getting rid of the fiery one of the flesh, the incorporated stowaway emanation of the adversary, will prevent stumbling any more in these, when these are completed as fully fledged sons of Yâ-hwéh, each being Him, the Anointed One. Thus the KJV has misrendered this sentence reorganizing it. 27 (BYZ) και <2532> {CONJ } (and) καθ <2596> {PREP } (according to) οσον <3745> {K-ASN } (how many) {omitted} αποκειται <606> (5736) {V-PNI-3S } (He reserves for Himself) {is appointed} τοις <3588> {T-DPM } (to the ones) {omitted} ανθρωποις <444> {N-DPM } (belonging to the sons of the dirt-man (’âthâ´m)) {men} απαξ <530> {ADV } (once only) αποθανειν <599> (5629) {V-2AAN } (to die off) μετα <3326> {PREP } δε <1161> {CONJ } (but amidst) {but after} τουτο <3778> {D-ASN } (this thing [is]) κρισις <2920> {N-NSF } (the separation/selection) {judgment} “ as it is appointed ” vs. “according to how many He reserves for Himself” – KJV omits translating Strong’s #3745 “how many” completely and mistranslates Strong’s #606 as “it is appointed”, a meaning being a stretch of “it is reserved”, a Headless statement, but when understanding “He reserves for Himself” and including “how many”, this violates the KJV Christian tradition that the entire cosmos will be saved, and puts a finite number on how many will be saved, something clearly expressed in codices. “ unto men ” vs. “to the ones belonging to the sons of the dirt-man (’âthâ´m) ” – KJV omitted “to the ones” simply because it did not understand that there are unauthorized archon riders in the separated place meant to be pure of as yet nonbelieving middle Yisrâ’ë´l, Christians with the wrong name for Yâhuwshúa`. The “sons of” is found in the Aramaic translations and is logical to include. And the Hebrew term usually translated to Strong’s #444 anthropos is ’âthâ´m , meaning dirt-man, but 1 Moshéh (Genesis) 3: 20 spiritually defines dirt-men as being the ones of Yisrâ’ë´l NOT being a servant of the name, yet. This clearly defines a subgroup of how many He reserves for Himself as these Christians with the wrong name for Yâhuwshúa`, not having Him indwelling, having unauthorized archon riders in their separated places. All this meaning is lost in KJV. Then the “ once to die ” takes on an entirely different meaning in the KJV: to be “ appointed unto men once to die ” when it’s really saying: of how many He reserves for Himself, He has been made manifest to the archon-riders belonging to the Christians with the wrong name to die off. “ but after this, the judgment ” vs. “but amidst this thing, [is] the separation/selection” – KJV chose the mistaken possible meaning of Strong’s #3326 meta because it thinks that these men are dying all throughout history, just once, never to return in another body, going to heaven or hell permanently. It missed the message that these wrong-name servants die off when He manifests to them, at the Sixth Seal in Disclosure (Revelation), and their fiery one dies, which is at the helm in them in their separate place, without which their body dies since they do not have Yâhuwshúa` dwelling in them. So KJV thinks the next thing newly dead men do is wait until the end time judgment. KJV loves translating Strong’s #2920 krisis as “ judgment ” and worse. Although more acceptable lexicon definitions of it are separation, selection, before judgment, KJV translates it as judgment 41 times, damnation 3 times, accusation 2 times, and condemnation 2 times, none as separation or selection. When Yâhuwshúa` manifests to His chosen at the Sixth Seal, it is in order to separate the living from the dead , and this means the emanations of sâţâ´n in these dirt-bodies will die off, as He also got rid of the one in His dirt-body very early, according to codices. This happening in the chosen is at the same time as in the dirt-men wrong-name servants, so “after” is mistaken, it’s “amidst”. So, the 144,000 do survive this becoming fully-fledged sons of Yâ-hwéh. 28 (BYZ) ουτως <3779> {ADV } (thus [is]) και <2532> {CONJ } (also) {omitted} ο <3588> {T-NSM } (he) χριστος <5547> {N-NSM } (the anointed One) απαξ <530> {ADV } (once only) προσενεχθεις <4374> (5685) {V-APP-NSM } (having been brought to Him) {was offered} εις <1519> {PREP } (for) το <3588> {T-ASN } (the One) πολλων <4183> {A-GPM } (of the many ones) ανενεγκειν <399> (5629) {V-2AAN } (to carry up) {to bear} αμαρτιας <266> {N-APF } (the errors) εκ <1537> {PREP } (outside) {omitted} δευτερου <1208> {A-GSN } (of the second time) χωρις <5565> {ADV } (separated apart) {without} αμαρτιας <266> {N-GSF } (of the error) {sin} οφθησεται <3708> (5701) {V-FPI-3S } (He shall be seen) τοις <3588> {T-DPM } (belonging to the ones) {unto them} αυτον <846> {P-ASM } ([being] Him) απεκδεχομενοις <553> (5740) {V-PNP-DPM } (the ones being patiently waited for) {that look for him} εις <1519> {PREP } (for) σωτηριαν <4991> {N-ASF } (the deliverance.) “ So Christ was once offered ” vs. “thus [is] also he the anointed One, once only, having been brought to Him,” – KJV simply omitted “also”, unable to reconcile it, that the selection, the chosen ones, the firtfruits 144,000 are ALSO the anointed One, when this has happened. These become Him when these are filled and fully-fledged, and the fiery one is dead and gone, though being still in a dirt-body. These then are given to the many of Yisrâ’ë´l outside Him, known as “heathen masses” and “peoples” and “languages” and “tribes,” as His witnesses. These many were categorized in two groups, the beast of the Land and the beast of the sea, in other scriptures, thus to these two are given His witnesses, not that there are only two witnesses (see Disclosure 11). KJV also again chose the wrong meaning for Strong’s #4374, because for the chosen to become the anointed One, obviously they must have already been brought to Him. “ to bear the sins of many ” vs. “for the One to carry up the errors of the many ones outside” – KJV omits “for the One”, thinking it’s redundant, but it’s Yâhuwshúa` within the chosen Who will do within His sealed witnesses the same as He did Himself, carry up the errors of the many ones outside, up to the Father. KJV also omits “outside” and “up,” effectively leaving Yâhuwshúa` carrying the sin permanently. “ shall he appear the second time without sin unto salvation ” vs. “Of the second time, separated apart of the error He shall be seen, belonging to the ones [being] Him, the ones being patiently waited for, for the deliverance.” – KJV felt free to rearrange this, but that affected its meaning: KJV makes it seem Yâhuwshúa` appeared the first time WITH sin, entirely wrong. As mentioned earlier, the adversary, the spawn of shame (Yaldabaoth) is the error; misrepresenting himself as our Savior, by this second time He appears, Yâhuwshúa` will appear to all Yisrâ’ë´l of that day, with these all having NO fiery emanation within them, so it’s separated apart from the error, and He shall be seen to belong to the ones being Him, the ones being patiently waited for. “the ones ” is a code term found frequently throughout decoded scripture to refer to these, but omitted from establishment translations as their standard method of translating Greek. “ unto salvation ” vs. “for the deliverance” – KJV’s enigmatic “unto” is another mind-bender, and the lack of an article which is implied in Greek makes it even more difficult, making it seem like it not being a fixed scheduled moment in time. The result of this is Christian traditions declaring they are already “saved” as soon as they believe their tradition, though they continue dying and erring and don’t even know His real name. KJV Hebrews 9: 27 has thus hidden the real meanings and promoted false traditions at the same time, by falsely mistranslating “ it is appointed unto men once to die ” is the TOTALITY OF SCRIPTURAL TEACHING and since it is prominent in Christian theology, its proponents should be called to task for the numerous discrepancies comparing their beloved KJV translation to the Greek; because scriptures all mention as matters of fact, without elaborate explanations because it was common knowledge. The recycling of the néphesh, the “transmutation” of it, returning back and forth (anastrepho) into separate nativities (generations), and the existing ones who have acknowledged Yâ-hwéh Yâhuwshúa` as doing so again each nativity, being the eternal ones (ages). So, correcting for all these issues in translating Hebrews 9: 24-28, which FPS (Firstfruits Purer Scriptures) calls To the `Ivríym , we include its text here: To the `Ivríym Chapter 9 24. Because not into handmade “pure places” did He Who [is] the Anointed One enter into, counterparts of the ones of the true ones; rather, into the same one [being] the One [being] heaven now, to manifest Himself with the One, with the external appearance of the One of the Power on behalf of us, 25. but not in order that frequently He should bring Himself, as however much he who [is] the high priest enters into the one [being] “pure places” yearly within, with the bloodshed belonging to another; [~sâţâ´n 1 Moshéh 9: 4-5 , 2 Moshéh 20: 13 )] 26. since then it would have necessary for Him frequently to suffer from the founding of the cosmos (material universe) . But now, once only , over the completion of the Ones of the eternal ones, for the abolition of the error [Yâhuwchânâ´n’s Glad Tidings 12: 31 ], by means of the one’s [~ the error’s (sâţâ´n/Yehuwthâ´h) ] slaughter of the same One, He has been made manifest, 27. and according to how many He reserves for Himself: [ ~He manifests ] to the ones belonging to the sons of the dirt-man (’âthâ´m) [ ~not servants of the name (1 Moshéh 3: 20 )], once only, to die off, but amidst this thing, [is] the separation/selection [ ~144,000 ] [ ~at Sixth Seal ] 28. thus [is] also he [ ~of the selection ] the anointed One, once only , having been brought to Him, for the One ‘ to carry up the errors of the many ones’ outside [ ~outside Yisrâ’ë´l – times of the witnesses ] [Yshá`Yâhuw 53: 12 ]. Of the second time, separated apart of the error He shall be seen, belonging to the ones [being] Him, the ones being patiently waited for, for the deliverance.

The divided house of satan formed a New World Order (NWO) under satan's remote direction. So, you're not going to be rescued from the old NWO; you're transitioning to a new NWO. TWO TYPES OF (PHYSICAL) NEW WORLD ORDERS GLOBALIST ELITIST KHAZARIAN MAFIA The United States went off the gold standard in 1933 Running as a 'Corporation of the USA' with foreign entities on foreign soil (Washington DC) Global Poverty Global Hunger World slavery (spiritual & material) Global Asset Relocation Income Tax & Property Tax Cashless Society Disarmament of Citizens Removal of the "god" gene Depopulation Concentration Camps satan-worshiping (cannibalism, pedophilia, children sacrifice, etc.) The Great Reset DONALD JOHN TRUMP ANTICHRIST Potentially zeros out all credit card, mortgage, and other bank debt due to illegal banking and government activities. This is the Federal Reserve’s worst nightmare, a “jubilee” or a forgiveness of debt. Abolishes the income tax. Abolishes the IRS. Employees of the IRS will be transferred into the US Treasury national sales tax area. Creates a 14% flat rate for non-essential new items, only sales tax revenue for the government. In other words, food and medicine will not be taxed or used items such as old homes. Increases benefits to senior citizens. Returns Constitutional Law to all courts and legal matters. Installs the original Title of Nobility amendment. Establishes new Presidential and Congressional elections within 120 days after NESARA's announcement. The interim government will cancel all National Emergencies and return us back to constitutional law. Monitors elections and prevents illegal election activities of special interest groups. Creates a new U.S. Treasury rainbow currency backed by gold, silver, and platinum precious metals, ending the bankruptcy of the United States initiated by Franklin Roosevelt in 1933. Forbids the sale of American birth certificate records as chattel property bonds by the US Department of Transportation. Initiates new U.S. Treasury Bank System in alignment with Constitutional Law Eliminates the Federal Reserve System. During the transition period, the Federal Reserve will be allowed to operate side by side with the U.S. treasury for one year in order to remove all Federal Reserve notes from the money supply. Restores financial privacy. Retrains all judges and attorneys in Constitutional Law. Ceases all aggressive U.S. government military actions worldwide. Establishes peace throughout the world. Releases enormous sums of money for humanitarian purposes. Enables the release of over 6,000 patents of suppressed technologies that are being withheld from the public under the guise of national security, including free energy devices, anti-gravity, and sonic healing machines. THE TWO NWOs: The divided house of satan formed a New World Order (NWO) under satan's remote direction, though the opposing demons working towards atheism and chaos trying to prevent satan’s ambition to devour all into himself being their god (demon). These made the system’s rulers each selfishly corrupt, stealing for themselves, and murdering for their selfish needs, depopulating as is being exposed about this world corruption. The world was enslaved in spirit and body by ignorance and against its will, and to serve for their material needs, and ownership of their bodies registered by birth certificates and SSN or other national IDs. Waking up to this is being called the Great Awakening. But the prospective solution to satan's own divided house is actually the New World Order wished for by satanists, with satan’s incarnation: the antichrist on top, having all the information to extort everyone, keeping them all in line organizing the chaos. The corruption and the stealing will all be satan’s, along with all executions, for his own thirst for bloodshed. In return, this antichrist will bribe all offering material prosperity, material-debt freedom, moral licentiousness and pantheism of all kinds of demon-worship. Instead of the other method, this slavery to satan will be put into effect acknowledging and loving his antichrist persona, voluntarily, and ownership of their néphesh (“souls”) registered through reverent homage to the superior rank (worship) of this one, joining his religion(s) including his counterfeit chosen people, visiting his rebuilt material false temple, to the point he will take possession of these. AN 88 YEARS INTERVAL: Believers in Yâ-hwéh Yâhuwshúa` do not partake in practices of the occult - Rev 13:18 (KJV) but rather expose them - Ephesians 5:11 (KJV). In satanic numerology, the number eighty-eight (88) carries great significance for the Cabal. Looking at the number 88, we are told it symbolizes the double directions of the infinity of the universe, that is to say, the infinitely small and the infinitely large. Allegedly the number 88 is also the numbered representation of the cross swastika - three times cranked. The number 88 is a white supremacist numerical code for "Heil Hitler." H is the eighth letter of the alphabet, so 88 = HH = Heil Hitler. One of the most frequent white supremacist symbols, 88, is used for the duration of the entire white supremacist movement, no longer simply neo-Nazis. Chess is a two-player strategy board game played on a chessboard, a checkered game board with 64 squares arranged in an 8×8 grid (Freemason Floors). The eight ball in billiards/pool is black and white and finalizes the game, signifying time in some respects. The Freemasons believe "as above, so believe - 88!" The masonic (33 degree) year (1933), which they chose for the USA to go off the gold standard, is an 88 years interval until 2021, when the gold standard will return with NESARA. So, you're not going to be rescued from the old New World Order; you're transitioning to new NWO with satan at the top, in person! And he is making you welcome it with open arms. Trump warned everyone that he is the serpent - repeatedly reading "The Snake" poem at his rallies, which is being welcomed with open arms. President Trump is rumored to become inaugurated on March 4, 2021 RD, as the 19th president of the restored Republic of the United States which was suspended in favor of a Vatican Corporation in 1871 RD . If so, this 'great reset' allows Trump to remain as president for longer terms. Emperor of the world? Keep in mind that President Franklin D Roosevelt "won" a record four terms in office from 1933 RD until he died in 1945 RD. After he left office, the Twenty-second Amendment of the US Constitution was voted through congress on March 21, 1947 RD. We suspect that DJT will do away with the Corporation's amendments made to the United States Constitution after 1871 RD. helpful links: We disclaim all name substitutions and false terms for Yâ-hwéh Yâhuwshúa` https://johnhenryhill.wordpress.com/2014/02/20/the-united-states-of-america-corproration-listings-laugh-or-weep/ https://humansarefree.com/2020/09/proof-covid-19-planned-new-world-order.html https://gesara.news/global-economic-security-and-reformation-act.html http://annavonreitz.com/beforethingsgetoutofhand.pdf http://www.annavonreitz.com/annavonreitz.pdf Back to Who is Trump?

'Elohiym is a specific name of a demon progeny emanation of sâtâ´n (adversary). 'EL OHIYM IS NOT MY YÂ-HWÉH Satanic Names Substitutes Misidentify Who We Worship Elohim Wrongly Inserted Into in The Torah (Law) XXX Elohim (Strong's #430) , the plural form of the singular noun elo'ah (Strong's #433 ) , a masculine noun xxxx [ Disclaimer : In this document in which we expose the foreign demons’ terms ’el, ’eloah , and ’elohiym , we quote others using the term “god” although we do not use this term ourselves for the Most High Yâ-hwéh, because “ god ” is also a term literally meaning “demon” in Hebrew.] Historical Evidence The first one to discuss of the distinction between Yâ-hwéh, usually “translated” the LORD , and elohim , traditionally “translated” as god , was their Rabbi Judah “Yehuda” Halevi, 12th Century A.D, in his book The Kuzari . At the beginning of the fourth part of his book, Judah exposes something unbelievable that precedes all modern academic scholarship researched-information on the subject-term ‘elohim.’ Yehuda tells us that the term ‘elohim’ is not original to their traditions as Yehuwdiym Jews rather that the term comes from the pagan world. Their “Rabbi” Yehuda Halevi, a revered philosophical teacher by Jews, points out that the pagan word ‘elohim’ is plural as it refers to forces or powers of nature; while the name Yâ-hwéh was unknown to them because of their tradition to not pronounce His names. So as a result, these followers of the Torah (Law) did not know how to pronounce the name Yâ-hwéh. The Jews Only Said the Name Yâ-hwéh Once a Year Scholars tend to agree that ‘Yâ-hwéh’ is a representation of how the ancient sons of Israel initially pronounced the Tetragrammaton (Four-letter word) , called “Barbelo” in codices. According to the Yoma and the Mishnah , the commentaries on it state that “one does not pronounce the ineffable name outside” – the limits of the material temple. But “on the Day of Atonement, ten times did the high priest pronounce His name”; [The Sacred Name – yahweh.org] this occurred while all the priests who gathered around in the material temple did loud chanting so that the public would not hear His name <> pronounced. Elohim: Adopted From the Pagan World The Kna`aníym polytheistic-pantheistic ‘religion’ which pre-dates Judaism, was borrowed from another belief system and had a history created to give it credibility. The New World Encyclopedia describes the belief system of “divine clan, headed by the supreme god El ; the gods collectively made up the elohim .” El — according to The New World Encyclopedia , was the chief deity, god of the sky, father of many lesser gods and ruler of the divine assembly, also worshiped by the apostatizing sons of Israel. In Ugarit, the gods were called 'ilhm (elohim), or the children of El. Through the centuries, the pantheon of Canaanite gods evolved, so that El and Asherah were more important in earlier times, while Baal and his consorts came to fore in later years. Many of the Kna`aníym deities found their way into the Greek and Roman pantheon. For example, the characteristics of both El and Ba`´al are visible in Zeus . The polytheists and name-substituters used the Greek ‘theos’ as well as the Ivríyth ’el interchangeably whenever they made references to the True Most-High Yâ-hwéh, just as they did to foreign gods as theoi and ’elohim regardless that the terms theos and ’el is a title they used and not a personal name for Yâ-hwéh. Theos: Occurs in the LXX with few exceptions as a translation for the Hebrew word ’elohim and His name Yâ-hwéh. However, morphologically-analyzed decoded LXX shows that every instance of theos was not applied to our Yâ-hwéh although post-advent “New Testament” Greek scriptures DO use theos applied to Yâ-hwéh, never the theoi plural form, confirming that ’elohiym was not found in the Hebrew post-advent original scriptures and this points to a post-advent time being when the term ’elohiym was inserted into Hebrew manuscripts. Theos – Greek translations of Hebrew scriptures correctly translated Hebrew ’Ël to Greek Theos (Strong’s #2304), as both are a generic term for a power/mighty one. Like ’Ël, when not clearly stated to be referring to our Yâ-hwéh, Theos also refers to demons. Yet, Theos is freely used usually as a component of religious Christian terms such as Theology, Theophany, Theocracy, Theosophy, Atheism, etc. A cursory look at the surrounding terms in Greek lexicons will show you that Strong’s #2303 theion is “brimstone”, sulfur, because it was considered “divine incense, because burning brimstone was regarding as having power to purify, and to ward off disease” (OLB Greek Lexicon). Reportedly, Sh’ówl stinks, of sulfur among its other smells, because brimstone is associated with demons. The book of Chanówkh (“Enoch”) also reports (interestingly in chapter 66: 6), this: 6 And when all this happened, from that burning molten mass of metal and from the agitation which troubled them in that place, there arose a strong smell of sulfur, which became mixed with the waters; and that valley where the Watchers, who had been guilty of seduction, burned underneath its soil. Therefore, theos is originally a term referring to these kinds of worshiped entities which are associated to sulfur, demons again. Whenever they made references to the True Most-High Yâ-hwéh, since these singular terms were routinely found in scriptures, the name-substituters used the Greek ‘theos’ as well as the Ivríyth ’el to substitute out His name they despised, regardless that the terms theos and ’el is merely one description they used and not a personal name for Yâ-hwéh. The pluralism of “Elohim” Then the polytheists, just as they pluralized foreign gods as theoi and ’elohim , the polytheist Jewish scribes replaced Yâ-hwéh’s name and most singular ’Ël references with plural ’elohim also. Although Yâ-hwéh is One (’echâth) , a Union, and therefore not plural. In fact, He inhabits those He causes to come to exist, to become within His Union. At the End, when the number of His emanations will be complete A-Z (Alpha through Omega), then He will again become One at the End to do away with darkness. The misunderstanding of this is likely what commenced those erring into polytheism, and it’s easy to see, particularly when the various emanations of Him get materially personified by the errant, and then Wisdom gets worshipped as “Sophia” etc. etc. The Septuagint (LXX) is a Greek translation of pre-advent “Old Testament” scriptures, which was written in the 3rd century BC Roman Date, far before the Masoretic text which was altered after Yâhuwshúa`’s coming. The 70 scribes who translated it hid large amounts of information from the heathen Greeks, hiding it in codes. Today, these codes have been decoded and analyzed, and, with regard to theos, it shows that every instance of theos in it was not applied to Yâ-hwéh, every instance of “Theos” occurring next to Yâ-hwéh (which it substitutes Kurios for), it says “One without regard for the THEOS of ’aharón (light-carrier/lucifer)”, προς {<3364> “not”} θεος {<2> “aaron”} Occasionally “theos” has been seen to be plural, ALSO having <2> for ’aharón (light-carrier/lucifer). The other way “theos” is seen in this decoded LXX is as “not a theos” referring to sâtâ´n, because he is not a true power/mighty one. But in the post-advent “New Testament”, Greek scriptures DO use theos applied to Yâ-hwéh, but never using the theoi plural form, confirming that ’elohiym was not found in the Hebrew scriptures available at that time, and this points to a post-advent time being when the term ’elohiym was inserted into Hebrew manuscripts such as the Masoretic text. Encyclopedias and Other Writings about Elohim Agnōstos Theos Ἄγνωστος Θεός” - was found inscribed on Greek altars dedicated "to the unknown god." The inscription had no mystical or theosophical meaning, but arose out of a concern for religious “cultic safety: no one wanted to incur the wrath of” a god, whose name was unknown, but who might exist vexed by the lack of honors. In their ignorance (agnosticism), the Greeks erected an altar to whatever god they might have inadvertently left out of their pantheon. In the book of Yehuwdâ´h The Gospel of Judas , they call a “Glad Tidings” we read how Yâhuwshúa` corrected the way our brothers, His pupils, praised Him. In one instance Yâhuwshúa` finds them gathered together and seated in reverence to give His Father thanksgiving. Then Yâhuwshúa` laughs at the demons who misguided them to pray in the manner that they did customarily. Had they had the foresight that Who was standing in their midst was Yâ-hwéh within Yâhuwshúa` as One, they would have instead turned their eyes toward Him to praise Him. “The disciples said to [him], “Master, why are you laughing at [our] prayer of thanksgiving? We have done what is right. ” He answered and said to them, “I am not laughing at you. You are not doing this because of your own will but because it is through this that your god [’el] will be praised.” The English translators of this book substituted “god” in the place of theo s and the Greek translators of this Hebrew book had translated ’ël as Greek theos . With this information, reconsider why our Father Yâ-hwéh Yâhuwshúa` taught His pupils, our brothers, a proper way to pray in MattithYâ´huw 6: 9-20, and that is because our brothers, the first on earth to follow Yâhuwshúa`, had been unwittingly worshiping elohiym , because they were heeding something else that was not Him. Since Yâhuwshúa` was not referring to Himself as the god [’ël] they had praised, the term ’ël there is about a demon. The 1966 edition of the Unger’s Bible Dictionary, Page 412, states that the word EL is a Kna`aníym “Canaanite” word meaning “God,” or “Devil.” The Interpreter’s Dictionary of the Bible, Volume 1, Page 817, under DEMONOLOGY, says: The word ELOHIM, (plural form of EL), means “demons” and or “gods", saying that they adopted this plural form, copying the Canaanites to "summarize all the various manifestations of this deity". It is sad to see that more recent reference-books have had such information removed, to revise history in a huge and quiet cover-up conspiracy to make these terms appear entirely acceptable for those researching them, simply because the truth about ’elohíym is that it ALWAYS refers to demons (and perhaps magistrates) and never Yâ-hwéh. Click here to see a screenshot reference in the book. According to the Raelian Movement Professor Katherine Bayer writes, the Elohim are a human-like alien race that created life through material scientific processes on Earth. The Elohim “created humanity as an equal, just as their [own] creators once created them as equals. They claim that through this process, intelligent life continues to develop throughout”. The Raelians claim that only they hold that the correct meaning of the word Elohim , as "those who come from the sky." They believe the more traditional translations of the word are in error. back to top Elohim in Inspired Scripture Codices In the codices we also read more damning condemnations against the term ‘elohim ’: From The End Times of Këph “The Apocalypse of Peter ” - “And the Savior said to me, "Be strong, for you are the one to whom these mysteries have been given, to know them through revelation, that He whom they crucified is the First-born, and a dirt-body [made by means] of demons to dwell in, and the stony vessel in which they dwell [is] of elohim [demons], of the cross, which is under the Law. But He who stands accompanying him is the Living Savior.” – In another codex, Justin’s Baruch, The Three Principle of the All are: “the Good One, Elohim, and Edem (the Earth). The first two are male; the third is female. The Good possesses the knowledge about the All. The word "Elohim" is called the father of what is [materially] created and father of the Jewish god-demiurge. Therefore, we should not capitalize elohiym as it is not a proper name. And again in the “Secret book of Yâhuwchânâ´n John”: “Yal dabaoth raped Eve. She bore two sons. Elohim was the name of the first. Yâ-hwéh was the name of the second. Elohim has a bear’s face. Yâ-hwéh has a cat’s face. One is righteous; One is not. Yâ-hwéh is righteous; Elohim is not.” Note: The Aramaic “Yaldabaoth” (Yaldabosheth in Hebrew) means Sp awn of Shame in English, another term for the adversary who was not acknowledged to be given a formal name at all. We see here satan made “Elohim”, which we have shown above is “not righteous” (correct), as it never should apply to our Yâ-hwéh. Scriptures are interpreted spiritually, not materially. With regards only to the term “righteous”, note it means “correct”. The name “Yâ-hwéh” is correct, but the name “Elohim” is not, because it, being plural, does not apply to our Yâ-hwéh Yâhuwshúa` Who is One, not plural. This passage means satan made a Yâ-hwéh underneath himself, which is not the Yâ-hwéh far over him, Who is Yâhuwshúa`. The adversary "satan" also made many other demons and named them with the same names as those in the highest heavens, and this is why the same scripture says true original ones have two names, as our Yâ-hwéh is Yâ-hwéh Yâhuwshúa`. The accuser also made elohim , which we have shown above is not righteous, as it never should apply to our Yâ-hwéh. "The demons’ (own) names, given by Yaldabaoth, are mighty names But the Powers’ names reflecting the glory above Will bring about the demons’ destruction and remove their Power. That is why each has two names." I have said, ye are gods, and all of you are children of 'elohiym We are not elohiym (demons), we are sons of Yâ-hwéh Yâhuwshúa` and will not violate Yâ-hwéh’s instructions written in our hearts of loving Him more than anything , to not worship the gods, which are elohiym. Our King and Savior revealed Himself to Moshéh as Yâ-hwéh Yâhuwshúa`, and never as Elohim, a fact obliterated out of the heavily altered Masoretic text, but as Yâ-hwéh said, we should not apply name substitutes to Yâ-hwéh, nor create images or anything which honors elohiym, the demons. After examining the widespread common use of the term 'gods' which means ‘demons’ in Greek, we can now see how English-speaking deceived Christians use this specific name of the foreign deity ’elohíym , into applying it to Yâ-hwéh Yâhuwshúa`. I do hope this article blesses you, the reader, to discover that the use of pagan titles did not originate from the first and original, writings. They were, in fact, only accepted by the people of Israel after coming into the material land which was occupied by Kna`aníym, and adopting their wrong terminology, because the Kna`aníym once spoke Ivríyth; however, their worship was of DEMONS. But the terms finding their way into the public-view scriptures themselves had to be after the ascension of Yâhuwshúa`, as the post-advent scriptures still show knowledge of the material omitted in codes by the LXX scribes. Considering how our Father Yâ-hwéh Yâhuwshúa` commands us to honor His names, publish His names, boastfully praise His names - 5th Book of Moshéh Deuteronom y 30: 17-19, only several hundred years later, satan worked his scribes, the ones working , so that our scriptures became polluted and degutted, substituting Yâ-hwéh’s name out with the pagan titles of plurist elohim, adonai, and satan-specific god , and lord . Though at the time, the use of these pagan terms was accepted and routinely used by the name-censoring copyists to replace Yâ-hwéh’s name to identify Him in their writings, they remain nonspecific at best, and at worst, specific for satan. Moreover, these pagan words cannot call on Yâ-hwéh Yâhuwshúa`, the name they forgot and did not prefer, because what they prefer are TITLES of satan and his demons, which they obeyed to alter the scriptures. It is by the intervention of the self-willed-one, the spawn of shame, and lesser god that scholars, who interpret the original Aramaic, Hebrew, and Greek Scriptures into English (and other languages) were led to conspire in the removal of His name Yâ-hwéh altogether, and to hide the name of Yâhuwshúa`, Who defeated him, completely; Their excuse? The one often given for this detestable censorship involves a misinterpretation of the Third Law of satan they made by altering our Yâ-hwéh’s Ten Messages , to say not “take His name in vain.” How then can we openly make praise offerings professing His name (Todah Yâ-hwéh) and how then can we boast about our Yâ-hwéh: (Hal’luw Yâ´hu)? Conclusion: This third law of satan (from the ten commandments) only promotes satan by having people remove specific references to the Most High Yâ-hwéh to forget Him and steal His praise. Therefore, every nonspecific name substitute serves satan unless tied to Yâ-hwéh Yâhuwshúa`’s name, and every name substitute specific for satan, like elohim , should never be used for Yâ-hwéh Yâhuwshúa.` The safest best option is to call Him by His dual names and if one needs to say He is our Power or Sovereign or any other description, such as Father, to keep it in English. Let each one take care, in one’s offering of one’s Testimony, to keep it purely about Yâ-hwéh Yâhuwshúa`, the One without regard for the ’ël or ’elohiym of ’aharon (lucifer/light-carrier), so eliminate elohim and all other deceit of satan. Feel free to watch our video Elohim Are Demons Do not trust a Word from the mouths of anyone who comes in the name of demons, 'elohiym' (El), or any other name-substitutes for Yâ-hwéh Yâhuwshúa` . back to top Bibliography & Source Links: Johnson, Sarah, Religions of the Ancient World, Belknap Press, Cambridge, 2004) Strong, James, Strong’s Exhaustive Concordance of the Bible , Nelson, Nashville, 1990) The Thirteenth Apostle - What the Gospel of Judas Really Says by April D. DeConick The Gospel of Judas Translated by Rodolphe Kasser, Marvin Meyer, and Gregor Wurst, in collaboration with François Gaudard A Dictionary of Christian Biography, Literature, Sects, and Doctrines , Volume 4 The Apocalypse of Baruch: Translated from the Syriac A Dictionary of Gnosticism Paperback – November 17, 2009, by Andrew Phillip Smith Cady, Susan, Marian Ronan, and Hal Taussig. Wisdom's Feast: Sophia in Study and Celebration. New York: Harper & Row, 1989. Camp, Claudia V. Wisdom and the Feminine in the Book of Proverbs . Decatur: Almond, 1985. Cixous, "The Laugh of the Medusa. " The Critical Tradition: Classic Texts and Contemporary Trends. Ed. David H. Richter. Boston: Bedford, 1998. 1453-1471. Irigaray, Luce. "This Sex Which is Not One." The Critical Tradition: Classic Texts and Contemporary Trends. Ed. David H. Richter. Boston: Bedford, 1998. 1466-1471. Johnson, Elizabeth A. "Wisdom Was Made Flesh and Pitched Her Tent Among Us." Reconstructing the Christ Symbol: Essays in Feminist Christology. Ed. Maryanne Stevens. New York: Paulist, 1993. 95-117. Mollenkott, Virginia Ramey. The Divine Feminine . New York: Crossroad, 1984. Newman, Barbara. Sister of Wisdom: St. Hildegard's Theology of the Feminin e. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1987. Whybray, R.N. Wisdom in Proverbs: The Concept of Wisdom in Proverbs 1-9. Naperville: Allenson, 1965. https://brill.com/view/book/9789004296008/B9789004296008-s011.xml http://www.ancient-hebrew.org/dictionary/500.html#430 http://gnosis.org/naghamm/nhl.html https://www.iep.utm.edu/gnostic/ https://www.thoughtco.com/raelian-movement-95694 https://www.encyclopedia.com/environment/encyclopedias-almanacs-transcripts-and-maps/agnostos-theos http://www.newworldencyclopedia.org/entry/Canaanite_Religion https://www.westernseminary.edu/transformedblog/2013/12/09/pronouncing-the-divine-name/ https://worldhistory.us/ancient-history/ancient-near-east/el-and-the-elohim.php http://www.ancient-hebrew.org/dictionary/500.html#433 "A son of Mine with regard for Perdition (’Avadówn) cares little for the education of Yâ-hwéh, but do not despond under the correction of His Son, oh Yisrâ’ë´l, because whom Yâ-hwéh loves, Yâ-hwéh educates, and Yâ-hwéh scourges everyone that has regard for the Son, whom He acknowledges as His own". - Proverbs מְ 3:11-12 מְשָׁלִ֥ים

Restored Ten Messages – a prediction about Yâhuwshúa`, which satan altered into commandments. THE TEN MESSAGES

Hidden Name Tutorial—These songs are crafted to teach our absent brothers, who are not yet among us, how to pronounce His names. While mainstream media opens portals that invite darkness, these melodies safeguard the listener. Embrace the rhythmic serenity and let the sound reveal deeper understanding. HIDDEN NAME TUTORIAL — SONGS OF LIGHT A guided way to hear, learn, and practice the hidden Name: Yâhuwshúa` These songs are crafted as a Hidden Name Tutorial —musical pieces in multiple styles that help you recognize, pronounce, and remember Yâhuwshúa`. They are not meant to replace your everyday music. Several versions of one song are designed to send a message to brother(s) not yet among us. What These Songs Are (and Aren’t) Being centered on Yâhuwshúa`'s name, His Love, and His Light, these lyrics return—again and again—to Yâhuwshúa`'s Goodness, and our true Home: the dimension of Light. They are not “worldly” in focus, putting very little attention on the present world where we’re stationed here for a while, awaiting His full completion. These are a medium for a pleasant learning practice that can be engaged in frequently. Through Him, the music becomes more than mere sound—it becomes a Way of learning, practicing, and remembering. In a sense, the channel’s signature is Yâhuwshúa` — the hidden Name; therefore, His Love, and Light is regularly featured in our songs. Why the Styles Vary The genres here are intentional, not random. They arise from two places: 1. Listener resonance (analytics): what helps people engage and retain the pronunciation. 2. Gentle guidance in Wisdom through Yâ-hwéh Yâhuwshúa`: the Love-infused direction that shapes the path of this channel, driven from personal experience. You’ll encounter relaxed chill/lo-fi, smooth R&B with progressive pop , energetic synth/Euro-pop , and the grooves of funk/neo-funk —with more to come. There are thousands of musical genres; as I keep learning how to use Yâhuwshúa`’s Name in time and tone, I’ll continue adding new styles, but keep in mind that our YouTube channel’s genre is Yâhuwshúa` — the hidden Name. How to Use These Tutorials Pick a song or playlist that fits your current mood (chill, R&B-pop, synth/euro, funk, etc.). Listen and repeat the Name Yâhuwshúa` as it appears—let the rhythm guide your pronunciation, as you wait for the name Yâhuwshúa` to appear again in the song. Revisit regularly. Short, frequent sessions help His name stay on your lips and in your memory. Share with a friend who’s ready to learn and practice alongside you. Switch the type of songs to vary and expand your horizons. Playlists (Growing Library) Chill & Lo-Fi Practice — gentle textures for quiet repetition. R&B + Progressive Pop — smooth phrasing with melodic emphasis. Synth & Euro Pop — energetic articulation and memorable hooks. Funk & Neo-Funk — rhythmic practice with groove and clarity. EDM & Dance — pulsing energy for practicing with intensity and rhythmic precision. Some playlists currently have only a few songs—this is just the beginning. They’ll grow into fuller journeys as new tracks are added. What You Can Expect Lyrics that lift the mind toward Yahuwshua’s Goodness and our Home in Light. Clear, recurring pronunciation moments for His name. Cinematic, peaceful visuals that don’t distract from the purpose. A space to pause, listen, and practice. This musical journey is guided by Yâ-hwéh Yâhuwshúa` and will continue until it reaches its appointed completion — 144 songs — symbolizing the 144,000 chosen Children of Yâhuwshúa`. Each song marks a step in that pure count and carries its part of the greater message to the whole number. Frequently Asked Are these meant to replace my regular music? No. They are for focused learning and remembrance—use them when you want to practice and center on Yâhuwshúa`. Why multiple genres? Different people/ears learn differently. Style diversity helps more people connect, retain, and pronounce His name clearly. How often do you add songs? Regularly. As guidance comes and as the channel grows, playlists will expand until they reach their purpose. Can I share these? Yes—please do. Share a link or a playlist with someone ready to hear and practice Yâhuwshúa`, or who seeks His help. Do you take song requests? No. These songs are not created by request or preference but by guidance through Yâ-hwéh Yâhuwshúa`. Each song comes when and how it is meant to, shaped by His timing and purpose. While we appreciate heartfelt ideas, this channel follows the path He sets before it — one song at a time. Why don’t your video lyrics include the accents or diacritics for Yâhuwshúa` as seen on this website? Because we want listeners to grow familiar with saying “Yahuwshua,” His only true name, by HEARING it, which happens to be Hebrew, rather than focusing on specifics on how it’s transliterated into English; this keeps the emphasis on the sound, rhythm, and recognition of His true Name—as spoken, not just by reading. Walk With Us Thank you for listening, sharing, and walking this path with us. There’s much more music to come—guided step by step by Yahweh Yahuwshua. → Explore the playlists below → Subscribe for new “Songs of Light” over at M.C: Songs of Light → Return often to practice the hidden Name: Yâhuwshúa` YÂHUWSHÚA`: THE HIDDEN NAME DUAL NAMES EXPLAINED – VIDEO TUTORIAL You can also learn how to pronounce His names (dual names) with our recording of The Saving Testimony. YÂ-HWÉH YÂHUWSHÚA The Saving Testimony 00:00 BACK TO TOP