A CODE KE Y TO DECODE LXX-CODED SCRIPTURES

YÂHUWSHÚA IS NOT JESUS Back to Top TO LEARN TO CALL ON HIS TRUE NAMES, LISTEN TO THE SAVING TESTIMONY

Yshá`Yâhuw 29:1-7 e 1. “ Hówy to the city (f.) of the demon-lion ( ’ariy’ë´l ) which kept being errant , Dâwíth the worker of goodness battled. Gather ye together by hand the offspring, the year Yisrâ’ë´l [ is ] outside, on the year, because ye of Yâ-hwéh shall eat together with Yisrâ’Ë´l from its own Father ( Mow’â´v ) ; ​ 2. Because of Yâ-hwéh , I shall squeeze out the demon-lion ( ’ariy’ë´l ) of Yisrâ’ë´l , though it shall become Y huwthâ´h , [ ~out ] of the same one (f.) [ ~city ] of the Son; she [ is ] not strong of Yisrâ’ë´l , and not belonging to the ones [ is ] the wealth pertaining to Me 3. of Yisrâ’ë´l , so I shall encircle, like Dâwíth, because Yisrâ’ë´l outside [ is ] against you of Yisrâ’ë´l , and I shall cast around Yisrâ’ë´l [ being ] y ou a palisade of Yisrâ’ë´l , and I shall place/set around Yisrâ’ë´l [ being ] you, fortified towers ​ 4. of Yisrâ’ë´l , and shall be reduced to inferior ones the ones not the words of The Way the ones (n.) [ are ] making become of you among My Yisrâ’ë´l , of the one (f.) not [ being ] the Land (f.) in Truth of Yisrâ’ë´l . And among My Yisrâ’ë´l of the one (f.) not [ being ] the Land (f.) in Truth , the ones not the words of The Way the ones (n.) [ are ] making become of you, they shall sink down Yisrâ’ë´l , so it shall become Y huwthâ´h like the ones not summoning, from outside of He Who “I shall exist ( ’e-hyéh ) Yisrâ’ë´l,” [ being ] the one (n.) [ ~wild beast (n.) ] not of the Land in Truth . She [ is ] not The Voice the ones (n.) [ are ] making become of you of Yisrâ’ë´l , even with regards to all Yisrâ’ë´l , pertaining to the ones not [ being ] the ground/base (n.) , she [ is ] not : The Voice the ones (n.) [ are ] making become of you shall be powerless, ​ 5. of Yisrâ’ë´l , and it shall become Y huwthâ´h like the raised dust separated from you , Yisrâ’ë´l of the war-chariot wheel, without regard for He Who [ is ] the Wealth of the ones not [ of ] the adversary ( sâţâ´n ) of the irreverent ones of Yisrâ’ë´l , and like the chaff/dust bearing the injustice of Yisrâ’ë´l , then it shall become Y huwthâ´h like the moment, instantly ​ 6. from beside Yisrâ’ë´l , of the “Yâ-hwéh ” of the war-armies ( tsvâ’ówth ) [ ~a demon named thus by the adversary ] , because the overseer of the passion of Yâ-hwéh shall become Y huwthâ´h – accompanying no one of Yisrâ’ë´l of the thunder of Yisrâ’ë´l , and of the earthquake of Yisrâ’ë´l, and of the voice/sound of the great wrath, the storm [is] coming down, bearing the injustice of Yisrâ’ë´l – yet the Flame of the consuming fire ​ 7. of Yisrâ’ë´l, even it shall become Y huwthâ´h , like one without regard for he who [ is ] one dreaming the Testimony ( `ëd ) within, among the ones of Yisrâ’ë´l with the sleep without regard for He Who [ is ] the Wealth of the ones not [ of ] the adversary ( sâţâ´n ) , of the heathen masses of all the ones [ ~of middle Yisrâ’ë´l ] , because as far as the river [ ~unto the death ] they march against that Yisrâ’ë´l outside, against demon-lion ( ’ariy’ë´l ) , and of Yisrâ’ë´l , all the ones that [ are ], not the ones, [ are ] ones serving in the army against Yisrâ’ë´l outside that is “ Yruwshâláim ” of Yisrâ’ë´l , and all the ones that [ are ] , not the ones, [ are ] ones the hand [ is ] gathering together against Yisrâ’ë´l outside [ being ] the same one (f.) [ ~sister (unpaired néphesh (f.)) ] [ being ] the Son of Yisrâ’ë´l , though the ones (m.) pressuring/compressing [ are ] the same one (f.) [ being ] the Son 8. of Yisrâ’ë´l ” … e e e e e e e previous page

YÂ-HWÉH YÂHUWSHÚA: WHY THESE ARE THE CORRECT NAMES Back to Top TO LEARN TO CALL ON HIS TRUE NAMES, LISTEN TO THE SAVING TESTIMONY

Gnostic Glossary Understanding Gnostic Scriptures Codices BACK TO TOP Helpful Sources & Links (not cited in glossary): ​ T. Desmond Alexander (Editor), David W. Baker Dictionary of the Old Testament: Pentateuch: A Compendium of Contemporary ​ David Lyle Jeffrey, A Dictionary of Biblical Tradition in English Literature Gesenius Thesaurus PhiloCriticoVT. Lat.ed.1835. LexHebChaldOTS. Tregelles.1857.4vols. ​ Flavius Josephus of the Antiquities of the Jews ​ The Hebrew Word הממך and the Root d-m-m I ("To Be Silent") ​ Ha’adam: Adam, man or human - The Importance of Interpretation in Biblical Translation - A pro-graduate thesis page 26 ​ The Hebraic-Roots Version Scriptures - Revised Edition Containing The Tanak and Ketuvim Netzarim An Original Translation Made Directly from Ancient Hebrew and Aramaic Sources ​ ​https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/87cb/c4dd0d085aa76b1b4f88676c5de08a70b30f.pdf https://d.iogen.es/d/ http://www.abarim-publications.com/Meaning/Adam.html https://www.jstor.org/stable/1454236?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents http://www.perseus.tufts.edu/hopper/resolveform http://stephanus.tlg.uci.edu/lsj/#eid=1&context=lsj https://www.laparola.net/greco/ http://archimedes.fas.harvard.edu/pollux/ https://www.ibiblio.org/bgreek/resources/abbott-smith.html http://www.newadvent.org/cathen/01129a.htm https://drmsh.com/adam-adam/ http://gnosis.org/naghamm/nhl.html https://www.behindthename.com/name/adam https://margmowczko.com/human-man-woman-genesis-2/ MATTER DOES NOT MATTER; ONLY YÂ-HWÉH YÂHUWSHÚA` ’S REALITY MATTERS

CLASSIFYING THE COMPOSITION OF THE POPULATION: According to Codices According to several codices there are three types of population [one codex uses the word “phoenix” (winged-creature) instead of dirt-man] in this world (cosmos), until the end of the world [age/cosmos]. Their circumstances are compared to the three kinds of wing-creatures of pardeç "paradise"(as seen outside of time). The reason for the different descriptions is because during this age, dirt-men and winged-creatures are two of the 4 spiritual animals. Néphesh (“soul”) means insufflation and can be either from The One of Light, or from the one of the darkness. An insufflation from the Light is immortal but the one from the darkness is not. According to one treatise, the composition of the population of this world consists of (1) a body originating from darkness and fire ; (2) a néphesh (“soul”) brought forth through the defilement of the winds and the demons; (3) a particle of Mind (rescued by Spirit) and to whom our Savior granted a Light called ‘Trust’ (“pistis/faith”) and Thought produced by the ‘astonishment’ (EKSTASIS) of the Spirit (4). The Greek word EKSTASIS, from which comes "ecstasy", literally means being outside of one’s self, and is traditionally misinterpreted by scholars translating it as being crazy, astonished, out of sorts, “beside yourself”. But EKSTASIS describes The Mind’s literally transporting outside of one’s self, resulting in the Thought – the response given from the inquiry of the Mind to Yâ-hwéh Yâhuwshúa`, Who gives freely from the treasures of knowledge and Wisdom. So, 'Thought' is a result of the astonishment (EKSTASIS) of the Mind, to Yâ-hwéh Yâhuwshúa`. The combinations of these four constituents (1-4) defines three classes of population, even the hylic (material people), which we have termed “Type C”. These hylics (Type C), are ruled by the néphesh “soul” and belong to darkness – they have body and a néphesh from the darkness. But noetics (mental people), which we have termed “Type B”, who are ruled by the Mind and belong to Trust (“faith”) – they have a body, néphesh, and a mind; yet pneumatics (spiritual people), which we have termed “Type A”, are who are ruled by Thought and belong to Spirit – they have a body, soul, mind and thought). ​ The sum of all of Type A and Type B compose the perfect finite number in the Mind of the Father, A-Z of one overcoming the demon (yisrâ’ë´l). Type A were procreated by the Son, and are known in restored LXX-decoded scriptures as yisrâ’ë´l above . Type B were procreated by Wisdom, currently being two daughters, one she procreated alone, B1, and the other she procreated with sâțâ´n, B2. The Son, Yâhuwshúa`, paid for adopting all of Type B, a broad category including all yisrâ’ë´l outside of Him: middle and underneath , per the descriptions of the vessels of yisrâ’ë´l found in LXX-decoded scriptures. But note that since Type C is not of the number of yisrâ’ë´l at all, they are not reckoned a vessel of yisrâ’ë´l and are hardly found mentioned in LXX-decoded scriptures, except the famous mention in Disclosure (Revelation) 20: 8 of the goats being rounded up to attack the last group of newly-existing ones, in coded speech as the ones not being the mountain (Ğowğ) and not from the mountain (Mâ-ğówğ). ​ The Hebrew word yisrâ’ë´l means one overcoming the demon , those outside have not yet come to exist of yisrâ’ë´l. In terms of the Tree (cross) and the Fruit (Yâhuwshúa`), A regards the Fruit, B1 regards the Tree (cross), and B2 does not regard the Tree (cross). With regards to where one goes when one physically dies, Type A goes to the Light, but Type B goes to sh’ówl (the underworld). ​ The chart below contains the information found in codices describing the characteristics found in each of these groups. It contains what we have noted after learning about these three types of characters in LXX decode d scriptures and the books of Baruch and our personal impressions with identifying their components accordingly with the codices and LXX decoded scriptures. We share the chart because inspired scriptures urge us to "know thy self,"; know how what composes each one, know from where each component came, and identify which kind we are, thus to know where we go after physical death. The codices mention three types of population, but we have identified that a group of deeply lost ones (from B2) are currently mixed in with the Type C to be discarded. To summarize , and to further explain the relation of this categorization to the LXX decoded canonical description of the vessels of yisrâ’ë´l: ​ Type A, who is called yisrâ’ë´l in LXX-decoded canonical scriptures, has the Spirit, Mind, and a Néphesh from the Light, and a Material Body and its néphesh, from the darkness. Type A are the offspring of Yâhuwshúa` alone. The Envoy functions as the Mind and provides His Spirit (gifted to the ones , not on loan). His Standing makes the uniqueness for type A to be called Spiritual: pneumatics . The dirt-body (with its fiery one) temporary tabernacle carries His néphesh (f.) inside. Type A loves the Most High, their Father. At the Sixth Seal, when everything returns from where it came, Type A drops one component in their composition made by sâțâ´n, the fiery one, which is the flesh’s néphesh (f.) . Type B, who is middle yisrâ’ë´l and yisrâ’ë´l underneath , have a Mind, Néphesh, and Material Body. Their conscience of there being something higher than they above makes Type B be called Mental ones: noetics. Type B are two daughters of Wisdom, so it has two subgroups, B1 and B2. Type B1 is the Middle "Day" offspring of Sophia alone; these love their Mother, and do have regard for the tree/cross. Type B2 are the offspring of Sophia and sâțâ´n, so codices say they have a choice of which of these two to prefer and take after, although neither have regard for the tree/cross. In LXX-decoded canonical scriptures, Middle "Night" yisrâ’ë´l are B2s are not being the darkness, but the sâțâ´nist widow yisrâ’ë´l underneath are B2s currently loving their father sâțâ´n, and striving to emulate their father sâțâ´n by doing away with their B2 Mind (conscience) as much as possible. ​ Type C, are not, nor will ever be any of the finite perfect number of yisrâ’ë´l, but they are mentioned in codices and described when pertinent in restored canonical scriptures. The Type C group is merely composed of Material body and Néphesh. They have no conscience of anything but material so they are called Material: hylic . Type C goats are expendable, stressors according to codices, designed for destruction, and also noted in MattithYâ´huw 25:32-33. Type C are the goats, and since the adversary has no regard for the finite perfect number, Type C outnumbers the finite perfect number, meaning it composes over half the population of this earth. Moreover, Type C rulers populate the top echelons of the pyramid of the order of this cosmos, which is upside down to make sâțâ´n, the lowest of all, literally the capstone oppressing everyone below him. The terms “above, middle, and underneath” refer to positions in the cosmos of Light, not this one of the darkness. Currently those ruling authorities of this world are mixed with the B2 sâțâ´nist widow Underneath according to their competing for the favor of the adversary. ​ They are those “not being the mountain nor from the mountain” who will be led by the least favored Middle-night B2 ones, who will have been misled by B2 underneath by their “false prophets”, when their Great Anger is released after one thousand years of recycling, and these will lead these Type C goats to surround those newly-existing widow B2 underneath, who by then will have come to reject their current father and accept Yâ-hwéh Yâhuwshúa`, and the Middle-night B2 ones will burn these ones with the fire of yisrâ’ë´l. : “Him against the material universe (All the ones entering into the cosmos (material universe), resembling a drop originating from the Light, are sent out/forth among My yisrâ’ë´ l of Sabaoth, “of the hosts” (a demon) in order that the same ones of the Son may be guarded/protected within Him (the Same One)”

In this document we put together the transcript of the video, The Timeline: "Donald Trump, Q and The Great Awakening ". Charlie Freak walks us through the timeline of President Trump's actions from 2017 to early 2019 RD with a convincing picture history of the events which he says proves every single government on earth has capitulated to Donald J Trump. We disclaim name substitutes for Yâ-hwéh Yâhuwshúa`. Click Document to Download English español Back to Who is Trump?

THE SAVING TESTIMONY AUDIO You can also learn how to pronounce His names (dual names) with our recording of The Saving Testimony. YÂ-HWÉH YÂHUWSHÚA The Saving Testimony 00:00 BONUS T RACK Hal’luw Yâ’hu - Yâhuwshúa` is Yâ-hwéh!

'EL OHIYM IS NOT MY YÂ-HWÉH Satanic Names Substitutes Misidentify Who We Worship Elohim Wrongly Inserted Into in The Torah (Law) XXX Elohim (Strong's #430) , the plural form of the singular noun elo'ah (Strong's #433 ) , a masculine noun xxxx [ Disclaimer : In this document in which we expose the foreign demons’ terms ’el, ’eloah , and ’elohiym , we quote others using the term “god” although we do not use this term ourselves for the Most High Yâ-hwéh, because “ god ” is also a term literally meaning “demon” in Hebrew.] Historical Evidence The first one to discuss of the distinction between Yâ-hwéh, usually “translated” the LORD , and elohim , traditionally “translated” as god , was their Rabbi Judah “Yehuda” Halevi, 12th Century A.D, in his book The Kuzari . At the beginning of the fourth part of his book, Judah exposes something unbelievable that precedes all modern academic scholarship researched-information on the subject-term ‘elohim.’ Yehuda tells us that the term ‘elohim’ is not original to their traditions as Yehuwdiym Jews rather that the term comes from the pagan world. Their “Rabbi” Yehuda Halevi, a revered philosophical teacher by Jews, points out that the pagan word ‘elohim’ is plural as it refers to forces or powers of nature; while the name Yâ-hwéh was unknown to them because of their tradition to not pronounce His names. So as a result, these followers of the Torah (Law) did not know how to pronounce the name Yâ-hwéh. The Jews Only Said the Name Yâ-hwéh Once a Year Scholars tend to agree that ‘Yâ-hwéh’ is a representation of how the ancient sons of Israel initially pronounced the Tetragrammaton (Four-letter word) , called “Barbelo” in codices. ​ According to the Yoma and the Mishnah , the commentaries on it state that “one does not pronounce the ineffable name outside” – the limits of the material temple. But “on the Day of Atonement, ten times did the high priest pronounce His name”; [The Sacred Name – yahweh.org] this occurred while all the priests who gathered around in the material temple did loud chanting so that the public would not hear His name <> pronounced. Elohim: Adopted From the Pagan World The Kna`aníym polytheistic-pantheistic ‘religion’ which pre-dates Judaism, was borrowed from another belief system and had a history created to give it credibility. The New World Encyclopedia describes the belief system of “divine clan, headed by the supreme god El ; the gods collectively made up the elohim .” El — according to The New World Encyclopedia , was the chief deity, god of the sky, father of many lesser gods and ruler of the divine assembly, also worshiped by the apostatizing sons of Israel. In Ugarit, the gods were called 'ilhm (elohim), or the children of El. ​ Through the centuries, the pantheon of Canaanite gods evolved, so that El and Asherah were more important in earlier times, while Baal and his consorts came to fore in later years. Many of the Kna`aníym deities found their way into the Greek and Roman pantheon. For example, the characteristics of both El and Ba`´al are visible in Zeus . ​ The polytheists and name-substituters used the Greek ‘theos’ as well as the Ivríyth ’el interchangeably whenever they made references to the True Most-High Yâ-hwéh, just as they did to foreign gods as theoi and ’elohim regardless that the terms theos and ’el is a title they used and not a personal name for Yâ-hwéh. Theos: Occurs in the LXX with few exceptions as a translation for the Hebrew word ’elohim and His name Yâ-hwéh. ​ However, morphologically-analyzed decoded LXX shows that every instance of theos was not applied to our Yâ-hwéh although post-advent “New Testament” Greek scriptures DO use theos applied to Yâ-hwéh, never the theoi plural form, confirming that ’elohiym was not found in the Hebrew post-advent original scriptures and this points to a post-advent time being when the term ’elohiym was inserted into Hebrew manuscripts. Theos – ​Greek translations of Hebrew scriptures correctly translated Hebrew ’Ël to Greek Theos (Strong’s #2304), as both are a generic term for a power/mighty one. Like ’Ël, when not clearly stated to be referring to our Yâ-hwéh, Theos also refers to demons. Yet, Theos is freely used usually as a component of religious Christian terms such as Theology, Theophany, Theocracy, Theosophy, Atheism, etc. A cursory look at the surrounding terms in Greek lexicons will show you that Strong’s #2303 theion is “brimstone”, sulfur, because it was considered “divine incense, because burning brimstone was regarding as having power to purify, and to ward off disease” (OLB Greek Lexicon). Reportedly, Sh’ówl stinks, of sulfur among its other smells, because brimstone is associated with demons. The book of Chanówkh (“Enoch”) also reports (interestingly in chapter 66: 6), this: 6 And when all this happened, from that burning molten mass of metal and from the agitation which troubled them in that place, there arose a strong smell of sulfur, which became mixed with the waters; and that valley where the Watchers, who had been guilty of seduction, burned underneath its soil. Therefore, theos is originally a term referring to these kinds of worshiped entities which are associated to sulfur, demons again. Whenever they made references to the True Most-High Yâ-hwéh, since these singular terms were routinely found in scriptures, the name-substituters used the Greek ‘theos’ as well as the Ivríyth ’el to substitute out His name they despised, regardless that the terms theos and ’el is merely one description they used and not a personal name for Yâ-hwéh. The pluralism of “Elohim” Then the polytheists, just as they pluralized foreign gods as theoi and ’elohim , the polytheist Jewish scribes replaced Yâ-hwéh’s name and most singular ’Ël references with plural ’elohim also. ​ Although Yâ-hwéh is One (’echâth) , a Union, and therefore not plural. In fact, He inhabits those He causes to come to exist, to become within His Union. At the End, when the number of His emanations will be complete A-Z (Alpha through Omega), then He will again become One at the End to do away with darkness. ​ The misunderstanding of this is likely what commenced those erring into polytheism, and it’s easy to see, particularly when the various emanations of Him get materially personified by the errant, and then Wisdom gets worshipped as “Sophia” etc. etc. ​ ​The Septuagint (LXX) is a Greek translation of pre-advent “Old Testament” scriptures, which was written in the 3rd century BC Roman Date, far before the Masoretic text which was altered after Yâhuwshúa`’s coming. The 70 scribes who translated it hid large amounts of information from the heathen Greeks, hiding it in codes. Today, these codes have been decoded and analyzed, and, with regard to theos, it shows that every instance of theos in it was not applied to Yâ-hwéh, every instance of “Theos” occurring next to Yâ-hwéh (which it substitutes Kurios for), it says “One without regard for the THEOS of ’aharón (light-carrier/lucifer)”, προς {<3364> “not”} θεος {<2> “aaron”} Occasionally “theos” has been seen to be plural, ALSO having <2> for ’aharón (light-carrier/lucifer). The other way “theos” is seen in this decoded LXX is as “not a theos” referring to sâtâ´n, because he is not a true power/mighty one. But in the post-advent “New Testament”, Greek scriptures DO use theos applied to Yâ-hwéh, but never using the theoi plural form, confirming that ’elohiym was not found in the Hebrew scriptures available at that time, and this points to a post-advent time being when the term ’elohiym was inserted into Hebrew manuscripts such as the Masoretic text. Encyclopedias and Other Writings about Elohim Agnōstos Theos Ἄγνωστος Θεός” - was found inscribed on Greek altars dedicated "to the unknown god." The inscription had no mystical or theosophical meaning, but arose out of a concern for religious “cultic safety: no one wanted to incur the wrath of” a god, whose name was unknown, but who might exist vexed by the lack of honors. In their ignorance (agnosticism), the Greeks erected an altar to whatever god they might have inadvertently left out of their pantheon. In the book of Yehuwdâ´h The Gospel of Judas , they call a “Glad Tidings” we read how Yâhuwshúa` corrected the way our brothers, His pupils, praised Him. In one instance Yâhuwshúa` finds them gathered together and seated in reverence to give His Father thanksgiving. Then Yâhuwshúa` laughs at the demons who misguided them to pray in the manner that they did customarily. Had they had the foresight that Who was standing in their midst was Yâ-hwéh within Yâhuwshúa` as One, they would have instead turned their eyes toward Him to praise Him. “The disciples said to [him], “Master, why are you laughing at [our] prayer of thanksgiving? We have done what is right. ” He answered and said to them, “I am not laughing at you. You are not doing this because of your own will but because it is through this that your god [’el] will be praised.” ​ The English translators of this book substituted “god” in the place of theo s and the Greek translators of this Hebrew book had translated ’ël as Greek theos . With this information, reconsider why our Father Yâ-hwéh Yâhuwshúa` taught His pupils, our brothers, a proper way to pray in MattithYâ´huw 6: 9-20, and that is because our brothers, the first on earth to follow Yâhuwshúa`, had been unwittingly worshiping elohiym , because they were heeding something else that was not Him. Since Yâhuwshúa` was not referring to Himself as the god [’ël] they had praised, the term ’ël there is about a demon. ​ The 1966 edition of the Unger’s Bible Dictionary, Page 412, states that the word EL is a Kna`aníym “Canaanite” word meaning “God,” or “Devil.” The Interpreter’s Dictionary of the Bible, Volume 1, Page 817, under DEMONOLOGY, says: The word ELOHIM, (plural form of EL), means “demons” and or “gods", saying that they adopted this plural form, copying the Canaanites to "summarize all the various manifestations of this deity". It is sad to see that more recent reference-books have had such information removed, to revise history in a huge and quiet cover-up conspiracy to make these terms appear entirely acceptable for those researching them, simply because the truth about ’elohíym is that it ALWAYS refers to demons (and perhaps magistrates) and never Yâ-hwéh. Click here to see a screenshot reference in the book. According to the Raelian ­­Movement Professor Katherine Bayer writes, the Elohim are a human-like alien race that created life through material scientific processes on Earth. The Elohim “created humanity as an equal, just as their [own] creators once created them as equals. They claim that through this process, intelligent life continues to develop throughout”. The Raelians claim that only they hold that the correct meaning of the word Elohim , as "those who come from the sky." They believe the more traditional translations of the word are in error. ​ back to top Elohim in Inspired Scripture Codices In the codices we also read more damning condemnations against the term ‘elohim ’: From The End Times of Këph “The Apocalypse of Peter ” - “And the Savior said to me, "Be strong, for you are the one to whom these mysteries have been given, to know them through revelation, that He whom they crucified is the First-born, and a dirt-body [made by means] of demons to dwell in, and the stony vessel in which they dwell [is] of elohim [demons], of the cross, which is under the Law. But He who stands accompanying him is the Living Savior.” – ​ In another codex, Justin’s Baruch, The Three Principle of the All are: “the Good One, Elohim, and Edem (the Earth). The first two are male; the third is female. The Good possesses the knowledge about the All. The word "Elohim" is called the father of what is [materially] created and father of the Jewish god-demiurge. Therefore, we should not capitalize elohiym as it is not a proper name. ​ And again in the “Secret book of Yâhuwchânâ´n John”: “Yal dabaoth raped Eve. She bore two sons. Elohim was the name of the first. Yâ-hwéh was the name of the second. Elohim has a bear’s face. Yâ-hwéh has a cat’s face. One is righteous; One is not. Yâ-hwéh is righteous; Elohim is not.” ​ Note: The Aramaic “Yaldabaoth” (Yaldabosheth in Hebrew) means Sp awn of Shame in English, another term for the adversary who was not acknowledged to be given a formal name at all. ​ We see here satan made “Elohim”, which we have shown above is “not righteous” (correct), as it never should apply to our Yâ-hwéh. Scriptures are interpreted spiritually, not materially. With regards only to the term “righteous”, note it means “correct”. The name “Yâ-hwéh” is correct, but the name “Elohim” is not, because it, being plural, does not apply to our Yâ-hwéh Yâhuwshúa` Who is One, not plural. This passage means satan made a Yâ-hwéh underneath himself, which is not the Yâ-hwéh far over him, Who is Yâhuwshúa`. The adversary "satan" also made many other demons and named them with the same names as those in the highest heavens, and this is why the same scripture says true original ones have two names, as our Yâ-hwéh is Yâ-hwéh Yâhuwshúa`. The accuser also made elohim , which we have shown above is not righteous, as it never should apply to our Yâ-hwéh. "The demons’ (own) names, given by Yaldabaoth, are mighty names But the Powers’ names reflecting the glory above Will bring about the demons’ destruction and remove their Power. That is why each has two names." I have said, ye are gods, and all of you are children of 'elohiym We are not elohiym (demons), we are sons of Yâ-hwéh Yâhuwshúa` and will not violate Yâ-hwéh’s instructions written in our hearts of loving Him more than anything , to not worship the gods, which are elohiym. Our King and Savior revealed Himself to Moshéh as Yâ-hwéh Yâhuwshúa`, and never as Elohim, a fact obliterated out of the heavily altered Masoretic text, but as Yâ-hwéh said, we should not apply name substitutes to Yâ-hwéh, nor create images or anything which honors elohiym, the demons. ​ After examining the widespread common use of the term 'gods' which means ‘demons’ in Greek, we can now see how English-speaking deceived Christians use this specific name of the foreign deity ’elohíym , into applying it to Yâ-hwéh Yâhuwshúa`. I do hope this article blesses you, the reader, to discover that the use of pagan titles did not originate from the first and original, writings. They were, in fact, only accepted by the people of Israel after coming into the material land which was occupied by Kna`aníym, and adopting their wrong terminology, because the Kna`aníym once spoke Ivríyth; however, their worship was of DEMONS. But the terms finding their way into the public-view scriptures themselves had to be after the ascension of Yâhuwshúa`, as the post-advent scriptures still show knowledge of the material omitted in codes by the LXX scribes. ​ Considering how our Father Yâ-hwéh Yâhuwshúa` commands us to honor His names, publish His names, boastfully praise His names - 5th Book of Moshéh Deuteronom y 30: 17-19, only several hundred years later, satan worked his scribes, the ones working , so that our scriptures became polluted and degutted, substituting Yâ-hwéh’s name out with the pagan titles of plurist elohim, adonai, and satan-specific god , and lord . Though at the time, the use of these pagan terms was accepted and routinely used by the name-censoring copyists to replace Yâ-hwéh’s name to identify Him in their writings, they remain nonspecific at best, and at worst, specific for satan. Moreover, these pagan words cannot call on Yâ-hwéh Yâhuwshúa`, the name they forgot and did not prefer, because what they prefer are TITLES of satan and his demons, which they obeyed to alter the scriptures. ​ It is by the intervention of the self-willed-one, the spawn of shame, and lesser god that scholars, who interpret the original Aramaic, Hebrew, and Greek Scriptures into English (and other languages) were led to conspire in the removal of His name Yâ-hwéh altogether, and to hide the name of Yâhuwshúa`, Who defeated him, completely; Their excuse? The one often given for this detestable censorship involves a misinterpretation of the Third Law of satan they made by altering our Yâ-hwéh’s Ten Messages , to say not “take His name in vain.” How then can we openly make praise offerings professing His name (Todah Yâ-hwéh) and how then can we boast about our Yâ-hwéh: (Hal’luw Yâ´hu)? Conclusion: This third law of satan (from the ten commandments) only promotes satan by having people remove specific references to the Most High Yâ-hwéh to forget Him and steal His praise. Therefore, every nonspecific name substitute serves satan unless tied to Yâ-hwéh Yâhuwshúa`’s name, and every name substitute specific for satan, like elohim , should never be used for Yâ-hwéh Yâhuwshúa.` The safest best option is to call Him by His dual names and if one needs to say He is our Power or Sovereign or any other description, such as Father, to keep it in English. Let each one take care, in one’s offering of one’s Testimony, to keep it purely about Yâ-hwéh Yâhuwshúa`, the One without regard for the ’ël or ’elohiym of ’aharon (lucifer/light-carrier), so eliminate elohim and all other deceit of satan. Feel free to watch our video Elohim Are Demons Do not trust a Word from the mouths of anyone who comes in the name of demons, 'elohiym' (El), or any other name-substitutes for Yâ-hwéh Yâhuwshúa` . back to top Bibliography & Source Links: Johnson, Sarah, Religions of the Ancient World, Belknap Press, Cambridge, 2004) Strong, James, Strong’s Exhaustive Concordance of the Bible , Nelson, Nashville, 1990) The Thirteenth Apostle - What the Gospel of Judas Really Says by April D. DeConick The Gospel of Judas Translated by Rodolphe Kasser, Marvin Meyer, and Gregor Wurst, in collaboration with François Gaudard A Dictionary of Christian Biography, Literature, Sects, and Doctrines , Volume 4 The Apocalypse of Baruch: Translated from the Syriac A Dictionary of Gnosticism Paperback – November 17, 2009, by Andrew Phillip Smith Cady, Susan, Marian Ronan, and Hal Taussig. Wisdom's Feast: Sophia in Study and Celebration. New York: Harper & Row, 1989. Camp, Claudia V. Wisdom and the Feminine in the Book of Proverbs . Decatur: Almond, 1985. Cixous, "The Laugh of the Medusa. " The Critical Tradition: Classic Texts and Contemporary Trends. Ed. David H. Richter. Boston: Bedford, 1998. 1453-1471. Irigaray, Luce. "This Sex Which is Not One." The Critical Tradition: Classic Texts and Contemporary Trends. Ed. David H. Richter. Boston: Bedford, 1998. 1466-1471. Johnson, Elizabeth A. "Wisdom Was Made Flesh and Pitched Her Tent Among Us." Reconstructing the Christ Symbol: Essays in Feminist Christology. Ed. Maryanne Stevens. New York: Paulist, 1993. 95-117. Mollenkott, Virginia Ramey. The Divine Feminine . New York: Crossroad, 1984. Newman, Barbara. Sister of Wisdom: St. Hildegard's Theology of the Feminin e. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1987. Whybray, R.N. Wisdom in Proverbs: The Concept of Wisdom in Proverbs 1-9. Naperville: Allenson, 1965. ​ https://brill.com/view/book/9789004296008/B9789004296008-s011.xml http://www.ancient-hebrew.org/dictionary/500.html#430 http://gnosis.org/naghamm/nhl.html https://www.iep.utm.edu/gnostic/ https://www.thoughtco.com/raelian-movement-95694 https://www.encyclopedia.com/environment/encyclopedias-almanacs-transcripts-and-maps/agnostos-theos http://www.newworldencyclopedia.org/entry/Canaanite_Religion https://www.westernseminary.edu/transformedblog/2013/12/09/pronouncing-the-divine-name/ https://worldhistory.us/ancient-history/ancient-near-east/el-and-the-elohim.php http://www.ancient-hebrew.org/dictionary/500.html#433 "A son of Mine with regard for Perdition (’Avadówn) cares little for the education of Yâ-hwéh, but do not despond under the correction of His Son, oh Yisrâ’ë´l, because whom Yâ-hwéh loves, Yâ-hwéh educates, and Yâ-hwéh scourges everyone that has regard for the Son, whom He acknowledges as His own". - Proverbs מְ 3:11-12 מְשָׁלִ֥ים

CONTACT US for any scripture related questions Send Thank you, your message was sent! Are you a brother? Come join us! The Way 144K Productions™ FAQ LIVE: YahwehYahuwshua.org Our website works best with Chrome

YAHUWSHÚA` IS YÂ-HWÉH Why do you say Yâhuwshúa` is Yâ-hwéh? Have you ever heard a Christian say, “Jesus is Lord”? Probably more often than with the definite article “Jesus is the Lord”, but if you simply capitalize what they say, King James Version style, they are saying “Jesus is the LORD”. Think about what it is they are trying to say, they are trying to say that the Anointed One Who came and lived a sinless life and gave His life on the cross and rose again and lives forever is the same One Who speaks throughout the scriptures you know as “the Old Testament”! It is a sad thing that few Christians saying this have actually thought this through, that it means that. But when we say Yâhuwshúa` is Yâ-hwéh, we are actually saying that the Anointed is the same Sovereign found throughout all scriptures, and we are saying it using His real names not the terms used in the King James Version and other scripture versions approved by this world’s establishment, which serves satan. So therefore, Christians saying “Jesus is Lord” shouldn’t have trouble with our saying Yâhuwshúa` is Yâ-hwéh, because it not only professes that the Anointed One is the Personhood of the Most High, but it says it using the proper names too. The Difference Between Yâhuwshúa`is Yâ-hwéh and “Jesus is Lord” Shouldn’t accuracy and correctness be important to us? Isn’t correctness and truth important to Him? Correctness is a modern term for the KJV term “Righteousness”. Do you want to be correct, “righteous” about His names? Error and Mistake is a modern term for the KJV term “Sin”. Do you want to err about His name, and “sin” about His names? Some people have been formed to immediately realize what’s wrong with changing the names of Who we worship. It changes Who we worship. Some people don’t take too well to being called something different by someone else. These are more likely to object to renaming Yâ-hwéh Yâhuwshúa`. But most people these days understand the concept of “identity theft”. The adversary has perpetrated massive amounts of identity theft, AND slander against Yâ-hwéh Yâhuwshúa`. And the degree of the deception is beyond the ability of most people to accept, so they go into denial. Traditional Christianity today has over 90% of its doctrines exchanged for satan’s information. So when a Christian today is happy and wants to pray and honor the Most High, sadly, all the credit and honor is being diverted to the most low, satan, because the terms being used are all about satan. Identity theft. What is The Difference Between Yâhuwshúa` and “Jesus” or “Yeshua”? Yâhuwshúa` is the only best way to transliterate and transcribe the true name of the Anointed One, whose name is easy to find in Hebrew. One doesn’t need to use supercomputers to find “bible codes” to find out what His name is. It is written in ZkharYâ´hu (“zechariah”) that one man’s name there was a portent of the name of the Branch. That man’s name was Yâhuwshúa` Bën-Yâhuwtsâthâ´q. Also, it is written in the Letter (Epistle) of Bar-Nâvíy (“Barnabas”) that Moshéh renamed his servant Howshë´`á “Yâhuwshua`” in order that Yisrâ’ë´l would listen to him. This KJV “Joshua” is actually the name Yâhuwshúa`, and that name’s spelling is the same. Further evidence that Yâhuwshúa` is the proper rendition of this name is finding that “Joshua” appears more than once in the KJV “New Testament” written as “Jesus”. This means that Yâhuwshúa`’s name is the one which went through the mill to become “Jesus”. This means that everywhere you might find “Jesus” written, it should be restored to Yâhuwshúa`, to be correct (“righteous”) and not in error (“sin”). You may have seen the name written in lexicons or Schofield reference notes as “Yehoshua”. Yâhuwshúa` gets altered by the jewish scribes to falsely read “yehowshua”/“yehoshua”. This they do in order to comply with a religious rule they have, to alter any name beginning in Yâhuw- to Yehow- in order to avoid saying the name of Yâ-hwéh, because the short form of the name Yâ-hwéh is Yâ´hu, which can appear in the beginning or at the end of names in Hebrew. But as you see with NetanYahuw, they don’t object to keep it intact at the end of a name. It is wrong to avoid saying His name. Scripture says we ought all to boastfully praise His name openly and publicly, and this is the meaning of Háleluw Yâ´hu! The name Yâhuwshúa`, when written in Hebrew, appears as Y-H-W-Sh-`. This name cannot spell “Yeshua” because “Yeshua” is written Y-Sh-`, and it does not contain the two extra letters. Moreover, there are several verses in scripture we have found to denounce a “Yeshua”, meaning that this false name “Yeshua” will be one name used for the impostor to come, commonly called the “antichrist”. ​ But there is even much more evidence about “Jesus” being a name for this impostor to come, even the Greek spelling of the letters 666 sounds like "Jesus". Who is Yâ-hwéh? The Most High is Yâ-hwéh. He is both the Father AND the Son. The only One Who can completely contain the Father is the Son. The Son referred to the Father as His Own Greatness. To understand this better, consider the Father as the Greatness, the Power, the Honor, the Love, the Light, the Life, the Goodness of Yâ-hwéh, Which is illimitable, undefinable in any number of words, uncontainable in our minds, beyond our comprehension, and better than we could ever imagine. And consider the Son as His Image, His Being, His Néphesh (mistranslated as "soul"), His Servant, His Personhood in fact. To know more about "The Crafty Use of Synonyms" done by His adversary, to confuse our language, watch our video What is the Sun . ​ The terms “father” and “son” are limited in the application to Him to refer to His relationship to His own Power, and one should not apply the biological aspects to this. This explanat ion is supported by all inspired scriptures, particularly when correctly translated. Not one contradicts it, unless mistranslated. Are You Sure Yâ-hwéh is The Correct Rendering of His Name? People outside Him have seen the Hebrew transcription of this name Yâ-hwéh as YHWH and not wanting to pronounce it, named that transcription tetragrammaton in Greek, barbelo in Aramaic, when scripture says in Chanówkh to not abbreviate His names. Other people see YHWH and, not knowing Hebrew linguistics, put in the wrong vowels. To read an in-depth study about the true linguistics, please read here . The satanic scribes wrote in the wrong vowels into YHWH in their altered scriptures, to correspond with their false tradition to say, “adonay elohim” (my sovereign the daemon ones) and produced “yehowah” which evolved to “Jehovah”. But this itself has an evil meaning in Hebrew which identifies satan. What is the importance of saying Yâhuwshúa` is Yâ-hwéh? Romans 10: 9-10 makes clear that this is the Good Saying, which one must profess with one’s mouth in order to be saved. It is not enough to believe in one’s heart that the Power raised Him from the dead, that justifies one, and this surely is important, but to be saved, one must profess Yâhuwshúa` is Yâ-hwéh to be saved. Surely most Christians believe enough to be justified, but these do not profess His names to be saved. And to say this saving testimony correctly, one must have both names correct. Else one is saying someone else is Yâ-hwéh, or that Yâhuwshúa` is someone else. That won’t work. Below there is an audio showing you how to properly pronounce His names, because the names are a call, a sound, which if spoken wrong, does not call Him. Listen to this and try to imitate what you hear, and see why we spelled it “Yâhuwshúa` is Yâ-hwéh”. ​ TO LEARN TO CALL ON HIS TRUE NAMES, LISTEN TO THE SAVING TESTIMONY The Saving Testimony Brothers in Yâhuwshúa` 00:00 Y âhuwshúa` is Yâ-hwéh: Accept NO Substitutes!