
SEARCH SITE
Report any issue with "No results found"
Results found for empty search
- What is Reincarnation?| Yâ-hwéh Yâhuwshúa`
Reincarnation, more accurately recycling,is early Christian common knowledge. WHAT IS REINCARNATION? On Recycling Most traditional Christian doctrines believe in a resurrection of one’s néphesh (“soul”) into a new and different kind of body of pure flesh, a new body made possible by our Savior (Yâhuwshúa`), because it’s described and explained in Qorinthíym (“Corinthians”). But the question of whether a néphesh (“soul”) ever returns to live more lifetimes in a different body of the same kind of corruptible flesh is one being denied by most traditional Christian doctrines, although a few approved examples remain in the establishment’s teachings, for example that of the son of ’avadówn (“son of perdition”) being both Yehuwthâ´h (“judas”) and the coming impostor-savior “antichrist”, and the mention that Yâhuwchânâ´n the Immerser (“john the baptist”) is ’EliyYâ´huw. We are calling this returning in a different body of the same kind of corruptible flesh, “recycling ” of the néphesh (“soul”). But beyond these examples, most Christians do not include the recycling of the néphesh (“soul”) into different bodies of the same kind of corruptible flesh in their belief-set. Why not? Most, simply because of lack of information, some due to trust in their teachers who repeatedly allege this lifetime to be their only chance and possibility to join their flocks, and few due to having read the establishment’s approved canons of scriptures they translated in a way to support their accepted doctrines, and trusting those. Yet religions outside Christianity report recycling and numerous personal experience testimonials report recycling, and historians report recycling to have been part of early Christian doctrine also. How is this topic important? Why is it vital for us to know this happens? And how can we find the evidence that has been covered up within the inspired scriptures? This webpage will answer these questions. The Recycling/Returning (Anastrepho) –AKA “Reincarnation” of the Néphesh One new age prosperity priestess, Oprah Winfrey, posed a curious question to the audience on her TV show, which aired sometime in the 1990s (Roman calendar), which we stumbled across in a recent year, which publicly displayed some of the consequences of ignorance about recycling, that provoked this article. Oprah’s chosen panel was contrasted by a Christian audience that struggled, trying to defend against Oprah’s intellectualized ideology embracing one of man’s many mistakes – which is to believe that there are many different ways to ascend towards the Father, Yâ-hwéh Yâhuwshúa` . Oprah attacked that the One Way scriptural concept itself is wrong. One Christian guest shouted, “Jesus is the Way!”, to which Oprah responded (and I paraphrase): ‘what if you are somewhere on a remote part of the earth and never get to hear the name of our Savior? What if you are a person who lives with a loving heart, as our Savior would have had you to live and for the very purpose He came to earth, and die without ever having heard His name? Does he/she go to hell?’ By saying this, Oprah denied the need for Yâhuwshúa` to ever have come and give up the life of His dirt-body on the cross, making Him irrelevant. So, several guests attempted to allay every negative opinion against our Savior made by Oprah. The audience’s group of Christians failed miserably, attempting to bargain with Oprah, because they were spiritually naked, not equipped with the Truth, nor empowered with His wisdom, to overcome her lies from satan. The reason for their defeat is simple, Christianity is reprogrammed with disinformation and taught that a properly inspired developed mind is one which accepts as true all what Irenaeus and the Church Fathers approved so as to dismiss recycling as heresy, as they did centuries ago. Such deceived Christians disbelieve in the recycling of the néphesh (“soul”) into new material bodies, also known as “reincarnation” to other religions, because the powers of darkness showed the foolish pastors teaching the error that through teaching ‘one life to live’, they could increase their material profits and gains through extortion of joining them or dying and going to hell forever. Those other religions using the term “reincarnation ” are unaware of or deny the resurrection into His new and different kind of pure flesh bodies. Therefore, because of reincarnation’s association to pagan religions, to some Christians, it becomes an alien, pagan, foreign-sounding heresy, which they view with horror if not alarm. They cannot accept its existence without renouncing their faith in what the canon says, and risk being ostracized by their flocks, because it’s smeared due to its association with Hinduism and other oriental religions, which openly embrace this concept which spread to other parts of Asia. Since reincarnation as a term does not specify what kind of flesh a néphesh (“soul”) reenters, we find it inadequate, so we use the term recycling when reentering material corruptible flesh, and resurrecting when entering the spiritual, incorruptible pure flesh new body He gives us. Recycling inherently means returning as the same material, and the neologism spares us having to explain and disclaim those thinking it originated from paganism. How Did this Bit of Truth get to Asia? Would it surprise you to learn that our Savior Yâhuwshúa` discussed reincarnation openly with His pupils? These very pupils were sent off as His delegates (“apostles”), and it was these who also traveled to Asia carrying our Savior’s teachings to our blind brothers there. After their teachings became diluted by satan, they still kept various concepts, albeit Headless; one such lesson is of us pairing again with our heavenly envoy or twin, “didymos” in Greek, (syzygy in Coptic). in Hebrew, Tâ’ówm, which is where the name “Thomas” evolved, and this re-pairing is which completes us in Him with Wisdom in the marriage chamber, our separate pure place, as a perfect union, but they lost the point and turned this into “tao” or “daoism.” Evidently, the same situation occurred in India, undoubtedly. Since they had learned long ago from Yâhuwshúa`’s delegates that the area behind one’s forehead, between the eyes, is the separate place and the sitting Throne reserved for Yâ-hwéh Yâhuwshúa`, the adversary excised this teaching, starting with His names, and what remains instead is sporting a “bindi” painted spot on their foreheads to “protect their “third eye,” the false vision source of the evil spirit occupying their separate place. Believers in Yâhuwshúa` as well as rebels against Him recycle, to continue their work for Him or against Him, respectively. Once a néphesh is granted the Truth in a capacitated lifetime and obtains Life, they may still recycle, being sent to teach the Truth to others. This concept also has vestiges left in India’s Hinduism, with the recycling of those ignorant of the Truth described as suffering “samsara," and obtaining this Truth as achieving “nirvana." But that Truth of Yâ-hwéh Yâhuwshúa` was not retained in their teachings. So to accurately answer Oprah’s question: every néphesh which originated from Yâ-hwéh incarnates through several lifetimes over time and is only able to attain eternal permanence (existence) by correctly acknowledging the Truth, that Yâhuwshúa` is Yâ-hwéh, our Savior, and giving Him the preference (mistranslated as “glory”) during one’s more capable nativity (“generation”) than one’s earlier blotted out lives, wherein he/she may never have heard His name. But notably, to negate Oprah’s deceit, no one (other than Yâ-hwéh Yâhuwshúa`) has ever qualified on their own to fulfill the law (torah) of satan, and all fell short of reaching the Father. One only gets reckoned correct (“righteous”) One Way , through Him, acknowledging and professing Yâ-hwéh Yâhuwshúa`, a name already expunged also from the establishment’s teachings. But these Truths were not present there among Oprah’s studio audience, much less among her panel. The Word Reincarnation/Recycling in Scriptures The word reincarnation derives from Latin roots re- (prefix), “again and again” (repetition) incarnare , meaning to reenter “flesh.” Remember, we said it doesn’t specify which kind of flesh. Yet, in fact, “Reincarnation” is a misnomer because the néphesh (“soul”) recycles in a new but similarly corruptible dirt-body but not making the same previous flesh body again. Therefore, pay no mind to those finding lookalike ancient images resembling current people as evidence of recycling. The only physical resemblance may be in the eyes , the windows to the néphesh (“soul”). Because of the ubiquitous acceptance of the term “reincarnation,” some ‘Bible thumpers’ (often KJV enthusiasts) argue that “reincarnation” cannot be true because that particular word is not found in their approved translation, the “Authorized Version.” That is only true because they have been looking for the wrong word . The main word to search for in Greek is “ANASTREPHO," found in both Greek post-advent scriptures and Septuagint (LXX) pre-advent scriptures. For those truth-seekers wanting pearls for word searches, here they are : Anastrepho , Greek Strong’s #390, means to return up, found in lexicons “to turn hither and thither, to turn one’s self about, sojourn dwell in a place” (recycling), and only metaphorically reinterpreted as “to conduct one’s self, behave one’s self, live” in order to conceal its true meaning of recycling in establishment translations of scripture. But wasn’t scripture first in Hebrew? Looking at what Hebrew words they translated as anastrepho, we relevantly find Hebrew Strong’s #02015 hâphákh , meaning also “to turn about, turn around, to change, transform, and in the hithpael conjugation, “to transform oneself, to turn this way and that, turn every way." We also find anastrepho translates Hebrew Strong’s #03318 yâtsâ´’, to be brought out/forth, to go or come out or forth, to come or go forth, to come out of. Also translated as anastrepho, we find #06213 `âsâ´h to work, #06437 pânâ´h to turn, be turned back, #07725 shuwv to return, come back, to bring back, cause to return, and #0813 shânâ´h to change, alter, to be repeated, to disguise oneself; all relevant to recycling . But if you look up these instances, you will find them all mistranslated in the establishment’s approved Authorized Version(s). Scriptural references to recycling of the néphesh (“soul”) are quite common in the pre-advent scriptures before Yâhuwshúa`’s ministry and post-advent scriptures. When retranslated correctly, they appear to mention recycling without much ado or fanfare, as though it had been a well-known and accepted belief. The book of Dâ´niyyË´’l and YchezqË´’l refers to recycling and the same specific people reappearing at vastly different times. The scroll of Bârúwkh also discusses Bârúwkh’s ‘returning’ to live in these end-times along with other Yâhuwshúa`-believers. Proper scripture translations of other scriptures of Páulus (“Paul”) reveal that people hearing him had trouble believing in Páulus’ preaching of the Resurrection (returning to live in new different pure flesh bodies) because they already thought they return anew in a newborn (returning to live in new different corruptible flesh bodies). (Source quote Theókleia & the ankh Egyptians and their monks found in philliposiym 3:17-19) So, Who/What Orchestrated this Massive Cover-up? The central business agenda of the establishment’s conservative Church Fathers and other religious authorities was to prefer higher numbers of followers for greater profits, being guided by evil dark agencies of satan, who placed them in official positions of authority over the believers in Yâ-hwéh Yâhuwshúa`. They happen to be those nepheshes who have not accepted the Truth, recycling to continue their work against Yâhuwshúa`. Their aim has always been to choose what doctrines they can stretch or alter to fit their agendas and block and smear whatever appears threatening to them in the various scriptures and, more recently, in numerous resurfaced Gnostic frameworks, to mistranslate them using their approved scholars to publicly ostracize and excommunicate everyone and blacklist everything they believe to be morally inexcusable in their eyes. In this way, good, significant, and revelatory texts inspired by Yâhuwshúa` were very much and often lumped together with satanic writings and labeled as PSEUDO (false/fake) uninspired heresy and thereby anathema (kept separate/cursed). Their strange consensus that there cannot be any more Yâhuwshúa`-inspired books of glad tidings than four in number is from Irenaeus, one of the so-called “church fathers”, because he saw there are four winds, and four directions; so they thought it should be fitting to ban other inspired books of glad tidings; this served their purposes by eliminating many books condemning them. The Author’s Personal Experience Until the summer of 2005 RD (roman dates), I had never investigated recycling ("reincarnation"), and the few ideas I had about it were shaped mainly by disparaging comments and attitudes I had occasionally encountered from the Christian community. However, I was always drawn to this topic because, from my very early childhood, I had a recurring nightmare: I was standing on a barren, white land, surrounded by others—some of them dressed like me, in long robes and headdresses. Not far off, Roman soldiers were approaching. The atmosphere erupted in panic; there was yelling and screaming. Then, suddenly, my knees gave out, and I saw my own head roll away from my body, now lying headless among others on the ground. My eyelids didn’t close right away. I didn’t blink. Somehow, I kept my gaze fixed on the final seconds of that life I once lived. The last image burned into my sight was of Roman soldiers—leather Caligula sandals pounding the earth, swords raised high, storming forward, trampling the dead, and continuing the slaughter. I searched museum databases for images of the women’s headdresses from my recurring dream. The results only extended as far back as the 14th century. From this, I’ve concluded that I am a recycled 1st-century believer in Yâ-hwéh Yâhuwshúa. Like myself, others recall past lives during their subsequent childhoods, found in all cultures worldwide. The Dangers of Keeping us Ignorant of Our Previous Lives Scriptural/spiritual lack of knowledge, which is unintentional, is ignorance, whereas when it is intentional, it is rebellion. Lack of spiritual information (nescience) about our previous lives is one such ignorance that is not only dangerous to one’s néphesh (“soul”) but also makes us spiritually naked (undefended), making us thus vulnerable, empowering dark agencies to exploit it inserting their misinformation and threats – and this ploy is intentional, and this strategy is widespread everywhere. It is in every Truth-seekers’ interest to research the translations of various scriptures, canonical and noncanonical, as one needs no proficiency in Greek or Hebrew to uncover revealing hidden messages in scriptures that go against the establishment’s traditional doctrines. But to do so correctly, one needs His guidance, acknowledging Yâ-hwéh Yâhuwshúa` by name, and making use of a good concordance, Scripture dictionary, and even individual historical records by live observers such as Bârúwkh (“Baruch”), Nóach, and Josephus. Learning what scriptures really say recovers the knowledge lost by unscrupulous alterations of scripture and prevents our exploitation by the forces of darkness. The scripture canon teaches that a man’s néphesh is in a state of pilgrimage and that the dirt-body it inhabits is NOT its correct dwelling place but a temporary place of sojourn, which implies that its true home is beyond this material plane (cosmos). Although it says that at physical death, the néphesh (“soul”) goes to sh’ówl, the dirt-body to the earth (dirt), and the spirit returns to the Father, but we are not from sh’owl, that is not our home. Therefore, we from Him must somehow leave it to return to the First, even if we did not learn His name during a lifetime. Why would they allow such questions to remain in our bibles? Why SO few? Some of the lights stolen by satan are still within his corps (spiritual body), not emerging yet, so Oprah proposes they must be emerging out through some other way than our Savior, during only their first lifetime. She does not know or hides that she knows that Satan buries our néphesh (“soul”) again and again, embedded for a lifetime again in a flesh-and-blood vessel, an animal body, a temporary habitation, to be granted another opportunity to learn the Truth from our previous mistakes. But his demons perpetuate our slavery giving us the handicap of losing our memory of our past lives and experiences by giving us a cup of forgetfulness that blots the memories of our earlier life; However, our néphesh - which is not part of the brain - has a blueprint that exists after death and contains within itself the mental and moral quality which is displayed as "character" and the essence of our true self (being). All these things are found in inspired scriptures, and finding this out can prevent the tragedy of dying without the Truth to recycle still ignorant of the Truth because life living within Him is so much better. Please click on this link to review our findings to some poorly translated scriptures in the canon, now accurately translated, demonstrating recycling . Suppression of the Knowledge of the Recycling of the Néphesh Pride associated with knowing anything is most active in people who know the least, especially with regard to the things of Yâ-hwéh Yâhuwshúa`. The pride about knowledge among the educated of this world, whether self-educated or formally educated, is based on collected heaps of material facts rather than by accepting His understanding of how the immaterial world affects people’s néphesh, found in scriptures. The “church fathers” were proud like their father, satan, and worked to suppress this knowledge of recycling, making the sources used in education only contain their teachings, so this pride would continue the work of suppressing the Truth. A false understanding many proud religious recycling-deniers promote is their belief that a néphesh is just the life of our dirt-bodies, and ‘what you see is all there is,' when, in fact, the dirt-body is not the real self but a mere temporary covering for the néphesh. According to them, when one dies, that’s their end; sh’ówl to them is the grave, nothing more – this is a Jehovah’s witness and SDA false doctrine. The néphesh is a spiritual seed, not material, and not even the same shape as the dirt-body and is the thing that recycles. Confusion arises because the ‘fiery one,' the flesh’s néphesh, which is an emanation of the adversary, is sometimes mentioned in scriptures, giving another meaning to néphesh as being one’s carnal (sexual) appetites. That néphesh dies with the death of the dirt-body. Proud materially scientific recycling-deniers claim that the thousands of recycled-néphesh cases generally do not stand up to their examination but are explicable in terms of natural causes such as genetics, repressed memory, and even lying has been suggested. Certainly, one can think of many other issues about which the authorities deny the truth despite mountains of evidence. Recycling-deniers, in their denials, have even attributed these facts to the work of occult powers. Notwithstanding the scientific evidence to the contrary, many recycling-deniers disagree with it because it is laborious to change to believe in these concepts without having the memory of a personal experience. A personal memory, we believe, adds much to contribute to one’s intellectual understanding to obtain a spiritual belief. Church History of Suppressing the Concept of Recycling Now a quick look at some vitally important “church” history, which contributed to the suppression of the concept of recycling, and then at what accurately translated scriptures tell us concerning the subject. In short, the truth about the recycling of the néphesh/past lives was generally acknowledged in the Judaism of old testament times (except among the Tsathuwqíym (“Sadducees”), who didn’t accept His resurrection or any transmutation of the “soul”) was known by believers in Yâhuwshúa`. But in 553 B.C., a focal point and exceptionally unpleasant incident transpired, which buried the truth (more about that below). The establishment’s interpretation of scriptures depends on biased standards they forced on the content, not on sound standards of scriptural understanding, of having the Mind of the Anointed, and making an accurate translation. The current establishment’s interpretation results from a centuries-long perpetuation of an illegal Church council's ruling, dating from 553 A.D., that reincarnation was not to be a part of the Church’s dogma because Origen was excommunicated for widely reteaching this. Very few people know about this bit of history; fewer still know the background of this decision or that Origen had been reckoned a “church father” before that. Specifically, “ The Roman Emperor Constantine married his way into power. His wife mysteriously disappeared. His second wife was his ticket to the throne. Then he had her killed. His third wife was a prostitute who had risen to the throne in the same diabolical ways Constantine had and who lived to have a devastating effect on the belief in reincarnation. She feared [sic (because her fear)] that her sins would follow from lifetime to lifetime infuriated her. She did not like the idea of karma. Her life was filled with lies and treachery. She was not interested in advocated [sic (advocating)] any religion that would demote her in another life. Thus, she persuaded Emperor Constantine to remove reincarnation from Christianity. ” (source: http://kuriakon00.tripod.com/reincarnation/kuriakon_reincarnation.htm) The prostitute turned empress and her various ecclesiastical henchmen engineered this action, who imprisoned the elderly then-pope (when he refused to summon the council) and therefore sent him for six months to a forced labor camp until he agreed to sign the rulings of the unlawful council. It was also at that time that nearly all of Origen's famous writings, a "Church Father" who wrote (among other things) about the truth of recycling of néphesh (“reincarnation”), aka “transmutation,” were collected and systematically burned. We became aware of his doctrines only because of a few remaining manuscripts, plus many references to his work in other "Church Fathers" texts. The idea that a néphesh would go through many lifetimes, recycling, on a journey towards a possible relationship with Yâ-hwéh Yâhuwshúa` to arrive at a final decision and return to Oneness with the Most High was only too dangerous to the power-hungry empress’ schemes to be permitted. And so, we were all victimized to become ignorant of this by the sordid history of the Church, including the corruption and oppression caused by the Roman Catholic Church, by their suppression of anything Hebrew and their non-Hebrew cultures and traditions. Many recycling-deniers would argue that the primary purpose of the Fifth Ecumenical Council of Constantinople (held in 553 A.D.) was to ease the tensions in the Church caused by the Council of Chalcedon 100 years prior to that; however, the council had convened to discuss the subject of transmutation of the néphesh (“soul”): recycling. Please, read THE ANATHEMATISMS OF THE EMPEROR JUSTINIAN AGAINST ORIGEN. (1): Number II. here: https://sourcebooks.fordham.edu/basis/const2.asp We defer to "The Formation of the New Testament Canon" by Richard Carrier (2000), visible at https://infidels.org/library/modern/richard_carrier/NTcanon.html Carrier's research paper highlights the political schisms within the early (post-apostolic) Church that warred over what was sound doctrine and what allegedly wasn't, and it exposes the lack of objectivity used to choose which books made it into the Bible and which ones didn't, and it records how the evolving Roman Catholic Church mainly determined what books the Bible we now have would contain. Church History of Suppressing the Concept of Recycling One common reason that Christians disagree is due to the doctrine of the alleged flawlessness of their Bible. This is something which was also drilled into me for decades; however, the massive alterations, the poor translations, and the enormous omissions of what they did not desire to include in it, make it clear that it’s not THEIR translation of the Bible which is the inspired scripture without error that we cannot deny, rather, those are the originals prior to all the changes they made. And subsequently, they base their false teachings upon bad translations and alterations made to support their false teachings, and Truth gets denied. The popular protest raised by Bible-believing Christians to the idea of “reincarnation” (recycling) is based on one verse, and one verse alone: KJV Hebrews 9:27. KJV Hebrews 9: 27 has long been a Christian traditionalist mainstay to defend their belief system of having only one life to live, but to choose their eternal destiny of heaven or hell. They even claim that Yâhuwshúa` spoke against recycling of the néphesh in “John 8:23” and that supposedly 1 “Corinthians” 15:47 supports that claim. Tragically, as with many other verses within their corrupted scriptures, over-reliance on its alleged flawlessness has influenced scholars’ interpretations and has concealed to them what this verse really says, so even other translations of this scripture echoes their mistakes, whether in the KJV, NIV, NASV, or any other of the central English translations. And usually, it’s quoted out of context to be even more misleading, as: 27. And as it is appointed unto men once to die, but after this the judgment: Surely if this were a flawless rendition, recycling would be debunked, yet even their canon contains several accounts of people who died once and were resurrected in the same body, dying later again physically generally, so the “once” term is wrong; and the néphesh that inhabited both the dirt-bodies of ‘’ËliyYâ´huw (“Elijah”), and Yâhuwchânân the Immerser (“John the Baptist”) was in these two separate vessels as recorded in scripture, without a “judgment” after it either, so this alone should define with certainty that Hebrews 9:27 is yet another mistranslated verse. Any interpreter will vouch that it’s impossible to translate something the interpreter does not understand, so we see in the context of Hebrews 9:27 many concepts their translators had not known, due to their self-imposed ignorance of many scriptural truths, so they could not understand it to translate it correctly. Yet, in short, here is how Hebrews 9:27, in context, should be translated, and for a study giving a thorough explanation with evidence of why this is a correct translation, see this link . To the `Ivríym Chapter 9 24. Because not into handmade “pure places” did He Who the Anointed One enter into, counterparts of the ones of the true ones; rather, into the same one the One heaven now, to manifest Himself with the One, with the external appearance of the One of the Power on behalf of us, 25. but not in order that frequently He should bring Himself, as however much he who the high priest enters into the one “pure places” yearly within, with the bloodshed belonging to another; [ ~sâţâ´n ] 26. since then it would have necessary for Him frequently to suffer from the founding of the cosmos (material universe). But now, once only , over the completion of the Ones of the eternal ones, for the abolition of the error [ ~sâţâ´n ] , by means of the one’s [~the error’s (sâţâ´n/Yehuwthâ´h)] slaughter of the same One, He has been made manifest, 27. and according to how many He reserves for Himself: [~He manifests] to the ones belonging to the sons of the dirt-man (’âthâ´m) [ ~not servants of the name (1 Moshéh 3: 20)], once only , to die off, but amidst this thing, [is] the separation/selection [ ~144,000] [~at Sixth Seal] 28. thus [is] also he [ ~of the selection ] the anointed One, once only , having been brought to Him, for the One ‘ to carry up the errors of the many ones’ outside [ ~outside Yisrâ’ë´l – times of the witnesses ] . Of the second time, separated apart of the error He shall be seen, belonging to the ones [being] Him, the ones being patiently waited for, for the deliverance. The Mishandling of Recycling in the Hands of Pseudoscience Those fascinated by the material world and studying it to know how material works are called scientists. Yet many fields of material science are notoriously unreliable because they contain much influence from the spiritual dimension, of which material scientists deny the existence of a spiritual world. In psychology and psychiatry, this is so bad that even the materially-minded laugh at its unreliability, so we call the material study of spiritual things pseudoscience. Yet there are now growing numbers of extraordinarily reputable and scientific research investigations documenting past lives being conducted by some of the world's top psychologists and psychiatrists, particularly with the memories of the experiences of children’s previous lives. But these material scientists fail to know the spiritual facts about why this happens because of its suppression by this world’s Christian religious authorities. The late physician Dr. Ian Stevenson, department head at the University of Virginia for four decades, and psychologist Dr. Brian Weiss and now by Jim B. Tucker together have identified more than 2500 cases which consist of children whose memories, specific knowledge, habits behaviors match those of particular individuals who were dead before the children were born. Many of the children had unique birthmarks, scars, or congenital defects that mimic wounds, in the exact location, on the bodies of the deceased individual. Many people ascertain having lived before their current life; these recollections are referred to as the return of the “soul” recycling, not as reincarnation. Some illnesses, physical deformities, and symptoms are encoded in our minds. Dr. Stevenson refers to his book “Reincarnation and Biology,” a case of a youngster who had disturbing graphic memories from a previous life. The young man had developed rope marks in the area where he suffered an injury in an earlier life. If a person’s mind can cause physical marks to appear on his or her dirt-body, recollections of a previous existence manifest with imprints on the present body, said Dr. Stevenson. Various birthmarks appear to identify with traumatic experiences in past lives—and these recollections blur as the memories fade. It is a reality that unless one begins to manage aberration built up in past lives, one will not progress in The Way. However, Yâ-hwéh Yâhuwshúa` urges us to “know the self” and gives us the tools through Him to handle upsets and aberrations from past lives that adversely affect one’s self in the present (life), thus freeing one to live a much happier material existence in Him. In the case of the author, this is the birthmark evidencing the fatal wound in my previous life, described above There is also a notable four-part video series on YouTube.com documenting the incredible tale of Louisiana's little James Leininger — through thorough interviews with his parents; his dad was a skeptic from the beginning but was persuaded after comprehensive studies; James' mom makes a remark to indicate they are likely Christians. You can download the case of The Case of James Leininger , documented by the University of Virginia. Dr. Paul Von Ward, in his article on the “genome,” writes that when a person can master a skill or an art at a very young age, he or she has acquired these skills over various life cycles and might begin to exhibit these extraordinary ideas, skills, or interests at a very young age, without prior experience (in that current life). The most frequent answer is “savant’ or “prodigy” — while this provides a label, it does not offer an explanation. Many prodigies have a fragile nature, sometimes, their knowledge and skills coexist with a mental (spiritual) disability. The Erasure of Past-Life Memories As mentioned earlier, it is written in inspired scriptures "codices" that our previous life’s memories are erased by the rulers/archons/demons (aka “extraterrestrials/aliens”) of this material region. This is what happens after one's physical death (and the number one reason for their fear of death): Once the non-acknowledging néphesh exits the dirt-body, it arises spiritually naked; successively, the receivers of god[-ariēl], come and lead the néphesh out of the body and, depending on the chastisement, spend three days touring with it, along with its counterfeit spirit which accuses it, into all the regions to which that néphesh has traveled. Thereafter, that néphesh is taken down to Sh’ówl before Yaldabosheth (“spawn of shame”) to receive its beating with fiery (underworld's electrical-) whips. Afterward, that néphesh (“soul”) is given the cup of forgetfulness, filled with all the different desires and all forgetfulness, and straightaway, when the néphesh drinks out of the cup, it forgets all the regions (past-lives) which it has traveled and forgets all of the chastisements which it has experienced. Then the cup of forgetfulness becomes a body outside the néphesh, and it creates the fiery component, which resembles the néphesh in all its figures and makes itself become like it, which is what is called the counterfeit spirit. Finally, that néphesh is cast into the regions of the sphere, being thrust in a dirt-body to recycle. Inspired by The Second Book of the Savior “Pistis Sophia," A George Horner Literal Translation Within our self/nephesh we have all of our stored data as an open access journal, and it performs only familiar things to itself and does not stray from its character. In Sh’ówl, the nephesh vows never to err again, but after drinking the wine of forgetfulness, she is bound to a vicious cycle, continuing to eventually repeat her sins because she has drunk and has forgotten all her errors. The End of Recycling – Obtaining the Resurrection “ Do not expect, therefore, the carnal resurrection, which is destruction; and they are not stripped of it (the flesh) who err in expecting a resurrection that is empty .” - The Dialogue of the Savior "People who say they will first die and then arise [“resurrect”] are wrong. If they do not receive the Resurrection [Garment of Light] first, while they are [materially] alive, they will receive nothing when they die [arise naked]. So, it is said of [His] anointing, “Great is the anointing,” for if people receive it (Him), they will live." – Glad Tidings of Phílippos A Néphesh Arising (spiritually) Naked Garment, Man of Light, Little One, Envoy, Resurrection, etc., are a few of the terms used for our Spirit Companion in Yâ-hwéh Yâhuwshúa`. At the last Trumpet, being in our Garment of Light, we will become invisible and consume corruptibility, and even archon demons would not be able to apprehend us. It is written that the chosen ones (“elect”) have already received the Resurrection, and as the delegate said of Him, we suffered with Him, arose with Him, and ascended with Him. Since we currently are visibly present in this world, we are wearing the garment (dirt-body) of the world. But as Phílippos writes, we “are in this world, it is fitting for us to acquire the Resurrection (now ), so that when we strip off the flesh, we may be found in Rest and not walk (be found naked ) in the middle.” If we do, from the Savior, we radiate His Light like streams of Light and are sustained by Him until our material death in this cosmos; This is the resurrection of the spirit, which swallows up the resurrection of the flesh. All living beings contain within their 'self' something so unique and so distinctive to an individual identity, visible in the totalities of qualities that make such a person become unlike anyone else in the world, and that is their collective character - intelligence (“archon-knowledge”), temper, beliefs, etc., is what distinguishes a person from another. Our collective character (within) is contained inside our spiritual self/nephesh. So, suppose when making a decision about Yâ-hwéh Yâhuwshúa`, a person changes their mind and turns away (“repents”) from following after evil four-winds and the works of darkness when this same person suffers a material death. In that case, this person is bound to recycle again, acknowledging Yâ-hwéh Yâhuwshúa` in their life. Suppose a person dies without being called to accept Yâ-hwéh Yâhuwshúa`. In that case, this nephesh is bound to recycle from Sh’owl having the same mindset ('collective character') it had before, UNTIL Yâ-hwéh Yâhuwshúa` calls on it, during whatever capable nativity it has been thrust into a dirt body. Nevertheless, when a néphesh comes to exist acknowledging Him, the spirit of Truth, our Envoy Companion, is the One Who acts as our external-hard drive bringing up things from our antiquities (past lives) to our present memories when we need them because we cannot accomplish such massive tasks from our own accord without Yâ-hwéh Yâhuwshúa` , while sojourning in the matrix (matter/mother/material) world – which is a place of forgetfulness. Otherwise, a person who stores terrible behavioral patterns, such as the ways of Çthom (“Sodom”), in their nephesh before finding out the Truth is bound to repeat the same mistakes from a previous life over and over again. The natural END of recycling into corruptible dirt-bodies (the empty carnal resurrection of the rebirth into corruptible flesh) is our resurrection into incorruptible pure flesh spiritual bodies, which for most will occur after the death of the physical dirt-body. However, some will be transformed into it in the blink of an eye. Certainly, none of us will die or recycle after that. But believers in the Truth of Yâ-hwéh Yâhuwshúa` from the past generations have been recycling still. They are all going to be among us during these end times. They will be the 144,000 witnesses after the separation of the living from the dead, at the 6th seal, when while remaining still in mortal physical carnal bodies without their fiery ones, these will be His witnesses as sealed sons of Yâ-hwéh. That is the last lifetime these live in corruptible flesh, and these will ingest (convert) the heathen masses predicating 1260 days as being His witnesses. Then they and their sealed converts are killed, and after 3 ½ days, they will be resurrected and called up to Yâ-hwéh Yâhuwshúa`. A Néphesh Arising (spiritually) Naked Exposé – Warning Against Hypnosis Some believers in Yâ-hwéh Yâhuwshúa` reading this will legitimately desire to know who they were in previous lives, because their néphesh forgot, due to the cup of forgetfulness given by the demons before they recycled. If you are one of these, please understand that though your néphesh forgot, your twin, your envoy “little One” did not forget, and He retains all those memories. So, the proper way to recall is to supplicate Yâ-hwéh Yâhuwshúa` through prayer for these to be told to you, and that will be reliable. It is an improper way and unreliable to utilize hypnosis to recollect such information because hypnosis is mediated by the evil spirits which are riders of the person hypnotized, and though some information may be true, it will contain deception due to the source, and misinformation. One should not meddle therefore with this mode of paranormal/supernatural information inquiry, which voluntarily deepens the néphesh’s imprisonment to its cohabiting evil spirits. Therefore, we believe hypnosis is never a useful tool, we deplore the commercial exploitation and misleading claims that are often made for it. A large part of what emerges under hypnosis is archon-led. We also discourage consultations with psychics, gurus, spiritual mediums or teachers, savants or any persons who claim to have the ability to help assist one in remembering one’s previous lives. And every eye will see Him, even those recycled-ones who pierced Him! Conclusion: Enforced ignorance perpetuates the power of darkness. Satan, the lord of death, uses the silence of the dead to try to maximize the darkness. But the loss of knowledge through death and the forgetfulness of recycling has not been the only way the demons have tried to keep the children of Light from emerging. Their servants tried to erase even this recycling phenomenon from common knowledge. Knowledge of Truth makes us invulnerable to being deceived, and our sharing this information can capacitate you to overcome the demons’ ploys to perpetuate their slavery of mankind, keeping us ignorant of the Truth of Yâ-hwéh Yâhuwshúa` which sets us free and overcomes them in every way. Their cup of forgetfulness and their establishment’s alterations of scripture, book burning, persecutions, and slaughters will not work against the Truth in this end-time generation, the Truth they sought to be kept hidden will be shouted from the rooftops. The children of the Light are all emerging again, recycling, to survive to accomplish a mission converting millions, while the worst of the worst have been recycling to continue to work the Transgression. Recycling is not our hope, Yâhuwshúa` our Resurrection is our Hope. Time (satan & measured time) comes to an end, and immortality ends death and recycling, and Yâ-hwéh will have made all of His own come to exist, permanently. But in the meantime, during the preceding thousands of years, recycling has given people second chances at hearing this Truth of Yâ-hwéh Yâhuwshúa`. May Yâ-hwéh Yâhuwshúa` continue to be praised always and forever. your brothers in Yâ-hwéh Yâhuwshúa` Disclaimer: We do not support the use of name-substitutes for Yâ-hwéh Yâhuwshúa` nor any false doctrines contained in the references below; however, we do recognize these authors as sincere truth-seekers whom He has led to do good work and much research, helpful to expose the works of sâţâ´n keeping truths hidden. Our hope is Yâ-hwéh Yâhuwshúa` leads the ones in Truth. Helpful Sources & Links Dedicated to the Reconciliation Between Recycling and Christianity Edward Reaugh Smith The Soul’s Long Journey: How the Bible Reveals Reincarnation BiblioWeiss, M.D., Many Lives, Many Masters ( WARNING AUTHOR FAILS TO REALIZE 'MASTERS' ARE DEMONS) Strong, James, Strong’s Exhaustive Concordance of the Bible, Nelson, Nashville, 1990) Tucker M.D., Jim B. Return to Life: Extraordinary Cases of Children Who Remember Past Life The Thirteenth Apostle - What the Gospel of Judas Really Says by April D. DeConick The Gospel of Judas Translated by Rodolphe Kasser, Marvin Meyer, and Gregor Wurst, in collaboration with François Gaudard The Apocalypse of Baruch: Translated from the Syriac Francis M. Concord. Plato’s Cosmology The Timaeus of Plato Yonassan Gershom. Jewish Tales of Reincarnation Geddes MacGregor. Reincarnation in Christianity Geddes MacGregor. Reincarnation as a Christian Hope “Pistis Sophia” The Second Book of Our Savior Paul Von Ward The Soul Genome: Science and Reincarnation Quincy Howe Jr. Reincarnation for the Christian Ian Stevenson, M.D. Reincarnation and Biology https://www.near-death.com/reincarnation/research/ian-stevenson.htm http://www.iisis.net/index.php?page=walter-semkiw-ian-stevenson-society-for-scientific-exploration-sse&hl=en_US www.carolbowman.com/library/double-birthmarks/ https://www.theepochtimes.com/a-theory-on-how-birthmarks-could-correspond-to-wounds-from-past-lives_846178.html back to top He is The Way for those who strayed, He is Knowledge for those who were ignorant, He is the Treasure for those who sought Him, He is Support for those who tremble, He is Purity for those who were defiled. He is the Light for the those in darkness, He is Yâ-hwéh Yâhuwshúa` , our Redeemer, First-Love, Brother, and True friend. Yâhú !
- animal & soul strong's translation | Yâ-hwéh Yâhuwshúa`
H Strong's # 05315 - Animal is a Néphesh ("soul") H Strong's # 05315 - Néphesh
- hebrews 27 interlinear | Yâ-hwéh Yâhuwshúa`
Interlinear View for Reincarnation Hebrews 27 The way the KJV (in green font) is worded in its translation appears to support their contention, examine it in context: 24 For Christ is not entered into the holy places made with hands, which are the figures of the true; but into heaven itself, now to appear in the presence of God for us: 25 Nor yet that he should offer himself often, as the high priest entereth into the holy place every year with blood of others; 26 For then must he often have suffered since the foundation of the world: but now once in the end of the world hath he appeared to put away sin by the sacrifice of himself. 27 And as it is appointed unto men once to die, but after this the judgment: 28 So Christ was once offered to bear the sins of many; and unto them that look for him shall he appear the second time without sin unto salvation. (emphasis added) Since the English flows, by design, readers assume there are no conflicts in its translation and fail to suspect any problem. But this is far from the truth. But even a layperson, using a good concordance and applying the principle of the importance of the broader context to the proper interpretation of a passage, quickly discovers that the correct translation and interpretation are as follows: First, there’s the standard wrong nomenclature: “God” means Fortune-distributor in Hebrew, and it means the same as “Demon” does in Greek. Christ is a transliteration of a Greek term meaning “Greased one” trying to say Anointed One in English. “holy” is derived from “hëylë´l,” which means foolish boaster in Hebrew, and refers to the “day-star” and appears as “Lucifer” in the KJV. “Sacrifice” means offering to “sakra,” which is another name used to worship the “day-star.” Second, correcting for those, when one looks under the hood at what they did with the Greek, it becomes apparent that the translators did NOT translate it accurately into English, nor in a logical way. They translated it into something that could FIT with their beliefs. To begin to examine and proofread their KJV, we put here the same verses in Greek, with their Strong’s numbers and parsing. When translating, each term has a range of possible meanings, and the correct meaning is chosen by the context and using logic, which means resonance with the Truth . With this Greek, we include the English meaning of each term, according to the parsing, which is easily verifiable looking it up in lexicons such as that in the Strong’s concordance. We put the KJV’s most important wrongly translated terms in green font here, and explain between each verse what is wrong with the KJV and why. 24 (BYZ) ου <3756> {PRT-N } γαρ <1063> {CONJ } (because not) εις <1519> {PREP } (into) χειροποιητα <5499> {A-APN } (handmade) αγια <40> {A-APN } (“pure places”) εισηλθεν <1525> (5627) {V-2AAI-3S ) (did enter) ο <3588> {T-NSM } (He Who [is]) χριστος <5547> {N-NSM } (the Anointed One) αντιτυπα <499> {A-APN } (counterparts) των <3588> {T-GPN } (of the ones) αληθινων <228> {A-GPN } (of the true ones) αλλ <235> {CONJ } (rather) εις <1519> {PREP } (into) αυτον <846> {P-ASM } (the same one [being]) τον <3588> {T-ASM } (the One [being]) ουρανον <3772> {N-ASM } (heaven) νυν <3568> {ADV } (now) εμφανισθηναι <1718> (5683) {V-APN } (to manifest Himself) τω <3588> {T-DSN } (with the One) {omitted} προσωπω <4383> {N-DSN } (with the external appearance) {in the presence} του <3588> {T-GSM } (of the One) θεου <2316> {N-GSM } (of the Power) υπερ <5228> {PREP } (on behalf) ημων <1473> {P-1GP } (of us,) “ In the presence of God ” vs. “with the One with the external appearance of the One of the Power ” – There is no word “in” in the Greek here, it is not in the dative case either. The dative case is used like translating the Hebrew preposition ל, but “in” is ב. And Strong’s #4383 lexicons definitions do not include the meaning “presence.” The omission of the rest of the phrase, combined with these mistranslations deny the meaning that Yâhuwshúa` IS Yâ-hwéh because He is the Personhood being the Sovereign within Yâ-hwéh and the Power is His own Greatness. KJV changes the meaning to Him merely entering a place where “God” is, a plausibly separate person, and in fact, being a real term for the adversary. 25 (BYZ) ουδ <3761> {CONJ-N } (but not) ινα <2443> {CONJ } (in order that) πολλακις <4178> {ADV } (frequently) προσφερη <4374> (5725) {V-PAS-3S } (He should bring) {he should offer} εαυτον <1438> {F-3ASM } (Himself) ωσπερ <5618> {ADV } (as however much) ο <3588> {T-NSM } (he who [is]) αρχιερευς <749> {N-NSM } (the high priest) εισερχεται <1525> (5736) {V-PNI-3S } (enters) εις <1519> {PREP } (into) τα <3588> {T-APN } (the ones [being]) αγια <40> {A-APN } (“pure places”) {holy place} κατ <2596> {PREP } (according to) ενιαυτον <1763> {N-ASM } (the year) εν <1722> {PREP } (within) {omitted} αιματι <129> {N-DSN } (with the bloodshed) {with blood} αλλοτριω <245> {A-DSN } (belonging to another) {of others} “ he should offer ” vs. “He should bring” Himself – KJV chose to translate Strong’s #4374 as “offer” and not “bring” thinking Yâhuwshúa` had Himself killed as an offering to the Father. This is wrong, Yâhuwshúa` had His dirt-body killed as a RANSOM for sâţâ´n, not for the Father. “ with blood of others ” vs. “with the bloodshed belonging to another” – “blood” in both Hebrew and Greek also means “bloodshed.” And notice how KJV makes plural “others,” without any basis. The case is dative, not genitive, so “of” is wrong, also. KJV could not explain the fact that bloodshed belongs to the adversary, one, not plural, information coded away in 1 Moshéh ( Genesis ) 9: 4-5 and 2 Moshéh ( Exodus ) 20: 13. “ holy place ” vs. “pure places” – Besides the fact that “holy” is a hëylë´l derivative invoking the day-star of the adversary, the foolish boaster, notice the KJV makes this singular baselessly when this is plural. The reason it’s supposed to be plural is because since every chosen one of Yisrâ’ë´l is made with a separate place within reserved for Him, Yâhuwshúa`’s emanation, to indwell, making us His living temples (“capacitors” is what the Hebrew term for “temple” means), we are plural, not singular. Every material so-called temple building made by hands is for the adversary, not inhabited by Yâ-hwéh Yâhuwshúa`. 26 (BYZ) επει <1893> {CONJ } (since then) εδει <1163> (5707) {V-IAI-3S } (it would have been necessary for) αυτον <846> {P-ASM } (Him) πολλακις <4178> {ADV } (frequently) παθειν <3958> (5629) {V-2AAN } (to suffer) απο <575> {PREP } (from) καταβολης <2602> {N-GSF } (of the foundation) κοσμου <2889> {N-GSM } (of the material universe) νυν <3568> {ADV } δε <1161> {CONJ } (but now) απαξ <530> {ADV } (once only) επι <1909> {PREP } (over) {in} συντελεια <4930> {N-DSF } (the completion) {the end} των <3588> {T-GPM } (of the Ones) {omitted} αιωνων <165> {N-GPM } (of the eternal ones) {of the world} εις <1519> {PREP } (for) αθετησιν <115> {N-ASF } (the abolition) αμαρτιας <266> {N-GSF } (of the error) {sin} δια <1223> {PREP } (by means of) της <3588> {T-GSF } (one’s) {omitted} θυσιας <2378> {N-GSF } (of the slaughter) {the sacrifice} αυτου <846> {P-GSM } (of the same One) {of himself} πεφανερωται <5319> (5769) {V-RPI-3S } (He has been made manifest) {he appeared [put too early in sentence] } “ in the end of the world ” vs. “over the completion of the Ones of the eternal ones” – KJV interpreted the Greek to express the TIME when He appeared to “sacrifice himself”, when Strong’s #1909 epi does not mean “in” nor “during”, and though it can mean “at”, note that Yâhuwshúa` was crucified in the year 4000 out of 7000 total years allotted for this material universe, and 4000 is hardly “ the end of the world ”. Strong’s #4930 means either completion or consummation, and not “end”. But since Strong’s #165 is referring to “the eternal ones”, not “the ages” (a mistranslation of the same Hebrew term), the purpose of Yâhuwshúa`’s Work on the cross was the completion not the consummation of these eternal ones, His chosen. But KJV went farther and interpreted “the ages” as “the world” when adding the stretched meaning of “ the end of the world ”. “ sin ” vs. “of the error” – Strong’s #266 means error/mistake, “sin” is a neologism highly laden with tradition, and the error/mistake meaning is lost. It being singular here in the Greek, and “sin” being implied to be plural is a mistake for the KJV. And KJV did not understand that the error is the adversary himself, as an error made by his mother, Wisdom, without the Father. Yâhuwchânâ´n’s Glad Tidings (“ John ”) 12: 31 says Yâhuwshúa` declared then to be “ …a Judgment trial of this world: now the ruler ( archon ) of this world shall be ejected out. ” This consequence was delayed by the adversary begging for a delay in paying what he owes, so this event is scheduled later in the 7000 years. “ by the sacrifice of himself ” vs. “by means of the one’s slaughter of the same One” – the omission of translating Strong’s #3588 “one’s”, KJV makes Yâhuwshúa`’s slaughter to be a suicide. Since we saw in verse 25 that it is sâţâ´n to whom bloodshed belongs, and scripture explains that Yehuwthâ´h/sâţâ´n was who murdered Yâhuwshúa` without justification because He did nothing wrong, removing sâţâ´n from the statement is wrong. “ he appeared ” [at the beginning of the sentence] vs. “He has been made manifest” – KJV makes Yâhuwshúa` appear in order “ to put away sin ”. This makes little if any sense. The scripture is saying that “by means of the adversary’s slaughter of Yâhuwshúa`, He has been made manifest.” How? Because His mortal dirt-body was given up for Him to be made manifest to be Who He really is, How He really is. Not merely to “put away sin”. The abolition of the error is to make possible the completion of the eternal ones, the chosen ones, because getting rid of the fiery one of the flesh, the incorporated stowaway emanation of the adversary, will prevent stumbling any more in these, when these are completed as fully fledged sons of Yâ-hwéh, each being Him, the Anointed One. Thus the KJV has misrendered this sentence reorganizing it. 27 (BYZ) και <2532> {CONJ } (and) καθ <2596> {PREP } (according to) οσον <3745> {K-ASN } (how many) {omitted} αποκειται <606> (5736) {V-PNI-3S } (He reserves for Himself) {is appointed} τοις <3588> {T-DPM } (to the ones) {omitted} ανθρωποις <444> {N-DPM } (belonging to the sons of the dirt-man (’âthâ´m)) {men} απαξ <530> {ADV } (once only) αποθανειν <599> (5629) {V-2AAN } (to die off) μετα <3326> {PREP } δε <1161> {CONJ } (but amidst) {but after} τουτο <3778> {D-ASN } (this thing [is]) κρισις <2920> {N-NSF } (the separation/selection) {judgment} “ as it is appointed ” vs. “according to how many He reserves for Himself” – KJV omits translating Strong’s #3745 “how many” completely and mistranslates Strong’s #606 as “it is appointed”, a meaning being a stretch of “it is reserved”, a Headless statement, but when understanding “He reserves for Himself” and including “how many”, this violates the KJV Christian tradition that the entire cosmos will be saved, and puts a finite number on how many will be saved, something clearly expressed in codices. “ unto men ” vs. “to the ones belonging to the sons of the dirt-man (’âthâ´m) ” – KJV omitted “to the ones” simply because it did not understand that there are unauthorized archon riders in the separated place meant to be pure of as yet nonbelieving middle Yisrâ’ë´l, Christians with the wrong name for Yâhuwshúa`. The “sons of” is found in the Aramaic translations and is logical to include. And the Hebrew term usually translated to Strong’s #444 anthropos is ’âthâ´m , meaning dirt-man, but 1 Moshéh (Genesis) 3: 20 spiritually defines dirt-men as being the ones of Yisrâ’ë´l NOT being a servant of the name, yet. This clearly defines a subgroup of how many He reserves for Himself as these Christians with the wrong name for Yâhuwshúa`, not having Him indwelling, having unauthorized archon riders in their separated places. All this meaning is lost in KJV. Then the “ once to die ” takes on an entirely different meaning in the KJV: to be “ appointed unto men once to die ” when it’s really saying: of how many He reserves for Himself, He has been made manifest to the archon-riders belonging to the Christians with the wrong name to die off. “ but after this, the judgment ” vs. “but amidst this thing, [is] the separation/selection” – KJV chose the mistaken possible meaning of Strong’s #3326 meta because it thinks that these men are dying all throughout history, just once, never to return in another body, going to heaven or hell permanently. It missed the message that these wrong-name servants die off when He manifests to them, at the Sixth Seal in Disclosure (Revelation), and their fiery one dies, which is at the helm in them in their separate place, without which their body dies since they do not have Yâhuwshúa` dwelling in them. So KJV thinks the next thing newly dead men do is wait until the end time judgment. KJV loves translating Strong’s #2920 krisis as “ judgment ” and worse. Although more acceptable lexicon definitions of it are separation, selection, before judgment, KJV translates it as judgment 41 times, damnation 3 times, accusation 2 times, and condemnation 2 times, none as separation or selection. When Yâhuwshúa` manifests to His chosen at the Sixth Seal, it is in order to separate the living from the dead , and this means the emanations of sâţâ´n in these dirt-bodies will die off, as He also got rid of the one in His dirt-body very early, according to codices. This happening in the chosen is at the same time as in the dirt-men wrong-name servants, so “after” is mistaken, it’s “amidst”. So, the 144,000 do survive this becoming fully-fledged sons of Yâ-hwéh. 28 (BYZ) ουτως <3779> {ADV } (thus [is]) και <2532> {CONJ } (also) {omitted} ο <3588> {T-NSM } (he) χριστος <5547> {N-NSM } (the anointed One) απαξ <530> {ADV } (once only) προσενεχθεις <4374> (5685) {V-APP-NSM } (having been brought to Him) {was offered} εις <1519> {PREP } (for) το <3588> {T-ASN } (the One) πολλων <4183> {A-GPM } (of the many ones) ανενεγκειν <399> (5629) {V-2AAN } (to carry up) {to bear} αμαρτιας <266> {N-APF } (the errors) εκ <1537> {PREP } (outside) {omitted} δευτερου <1208> {A-GSN } (of the second time) χωρις <5565> {ADV } (separated apart) {without} αμαρτιας <266> {N-GSF } (of the error) {sin} οφθησεται <3708> (5701) {V-FPI-3S } (He shall be seen) τοις <3588> {T-DPM } (belonging to the ones) {unto them} αυτον <846> {P-ASM } ([being] Him) απεκδεχομενοις <553> (5740) {V-PNP-DPM } (the ones being patiently waited for) {that look for him} εις <1519> {PREP } (for) σωτηριαν <4991> {N-ASF } (the deliverance.) “ So Christ was once offered ” vs. “thus [is] also he the anointed One, once only, having been brought to Him,” – KJV simply omitted “also”, unable to reconcile it, that the selection, the chosen ones, the firtfruits 144,000 are ALSO the anointed One, when this has happened. These become Him when these are filled and fully-fledged, and the fiery one is dead and gone, though being still in a dirt-body. These then are given to the many of Yisrâ’ë´l outside Him, known as “heathen masses” and “peoples” and “languages” and “tribes,” as His witnesses. These many were categorized in two groups, the beast of the Land and the beast of the sea, in other scriptures, thus to these two are given His witnesses, not that there are only two witnesses (see Disclosure 11). KJV also again chose the wrong meaning for Strong’s #4374, because for the chosen to become the anointed One, obviously they must have already been brought to Him. “ to bear the sins of many ” vs. “for the One to carry up the errors of the many ones outside” – KJV omits “for the One”, thinking it’s redundant, but it’s Yâhuwshúa` within the chosen Who will do within His sealed witnesses the same as He did Himself, carry up the errors of the many ones outside, up to the Father. KJV also omits “outside” and “up,” effectively leaving Yâhuwshúa` carrying the sin permanently. “ shall he appear the second time without sin unto salvation ” vs. “Of the second time, separated apart of the error He shall be seen, belonging to the ones [being] Him, the ones being patiently waited for, for the deliverance.” – KJV felt free to rearrange this, but that affected its meaning: KJV makes it seem Yâhuwshúa` appeared the first time WITH sin, entirely wrong. As mentioned earlier, the adversary, the spawn of shame (Yaldabaoth) is the error; misrepresenting himself as our Savior, by this second time He appears, Yâhuwshúa` will appear to all Yisrâ’ë´l of that day, with these all having NO fiery emanation within them, so it’s separated apart from the error, and He shall be seen to belong to the ones being Him, the ones being patiently waited for. “the ones ” is a code term found frequently throughout decoded scripture to refer to these, but omitted from establishment translations as their standard method of translating Greek. “ unto salvation ” vs. “for the deliverance” – KJV’s enigmatic “unto” is another mind-bender, and the lack of an article which is implied in Greek makes it even more difficult, making it seem like it not being a fixed scheduled moment in time. The result of this is Christian traditions declaring they are already “saved” as soon as they believe their tradition, though they continue dying and erring and don’t even know His real name. KJV Hebrews 9: 27 has thus hidden the real meanings and promoted false traditions at the same time, by falsely mistranslating “ it is appointed unto men once to die ” is the TOTALITY OF SCRIPTURAL TEACHING and since it is prominent in Christian theology, its proponents should be called to task for the numerous discrepancies comparing their beloved KJV translation to the Greek; because scriptures all mention as matters of fact, without elaborate explanations because it was common knowledge. The recycling of the néphesh, the “transmutation” of it, returning back and forth (anastrepho) into separate nativities (generations), and the existing ones who have acknowledged Yâ-hwéh Yâhuwshúa` as doing so again each nativity, being the eternal ones (ages). So, correcting for all these issues in translating Hebrews 9: 24-28, which FPS (Firstfruits Purer Scriptures) calls To the `Ivríym , we include its text here: To the `Ivríym Chapter 9 24. Because not into handmade “pure places” did He Who [is] the Anointed One enter into, counterparts of the ones of the true ones; rather, into the same one [being] the One [being] heaven now, to manifest Himself with the One, with the external appearance of the One of the Power on behalf of us, 25. but not in order that frequently He should bring Himself, as however much he who [is] the high priest enters into the one [being] “pure places” yearly within, with the bloodshed belonging to another; [~sâţâ´n 1 Moshéh 9: 4-5 , 2 Moshéh 20: 13 )] 26. since then it would have necessary for Him frequently to suffer from the founding of the cosmos (material universe) . But now, once only , over the completion of the Ones of the eternal ones, for the abolition of the error [Yâhuwchânâ´n’s Glad Tidings 12: 31 ], by means of the one’s [~ the error’s (sâţâ´n/Yehuwthâ´h) ] slaughter of the same One, He has been made manifest, 27. and according to how many He reserves for Himself: [ ~He manifests ] to the ones belonging to the sons of the dirt-man (’âthâ´m) [ ~not servants of the name (1 Moshéh 3: 20 )], once only, to die off, but amidst this thing, [is] the separation/selection [ ~144,000 ] [ ~at Sixth Seal ] 28. thus [is] also he [ ~of the selection ] the anointed One, once only , having been brought to Him, for the One ‘ to carry up the errors of the many ones’ outside [ ~outside Yisrâ’ë´l – times of the witnesses ] [Yshá`Yâhuw 53: 12 ]. Of the second time, separated apart of the error He shall be seen, belonging to the ones [being] Him, the ones being patiently waited for, for the deliverance.
- 2 types of NWO | Yâ-hwéh Yâhuwshúa`
The divided house of satan formed a New World Order (NWO) under satan's remote direction. So, you're not going to be rescued from the old NWO; you're transitioning to a new NWO. TWO TYPES OF (PHYSICAL) NEW WORLD ORDERS GLOBALIST ELITIST KHAZARIAN MAFIA The United States went off the gold standard in 1933 Running as a 'Corporation of the USA' with foreign entities on foreign soil (Washington DC) Global Poverty Global Hunger World slavery (spiritual & material) Global Asset Relocation Income Tax & Property Tax Cashless Society Disarmament of Citizens Removal of the "god" gene Depopulation Concentration Camps satan-worshiping (cannibalism, pedophilia, children sacrifice, etc.) The Great Reset DONALD JOHN TRUMP ANTICHRIST Potentially zeros out all credit card, mortgage, and other bank debt due to illegal banking and government activities. This is the Federal Reserve’s worst nightmare, a “jubilee” or a forgiveness of debt. Abolishes the income tax. Abolishes the IRS. Employees of the IRS will be transferred into the US Treasury national sales tax area. Creates a 14% flat rate for non-essential new items, only sales tax revenue for the government. In other words, food and medicine will not be taxed or used items such as old homes. Increases benefits to senior citizens. Returns Constitutional Law to all courts and legal matters. Installs the original Title of Nobility amendment. Establishes new Presidential and Congressional elections within 120 days after NESARA's announcement. The interim government will cancel all National Emergencies and return us back to constitutional law. Monitors elections and prevents illegal election activities of special interest groups. Creates a new U.S. Treasury rainbow currency backed by gold, silver, and platinum precious metals, ending the bankruptcy of the United States initiated by Franklin Roosevelt in 1933. Forbids the sale of American birth certificate records as chattel property bonds by the US Department of Transportation. Initiates new U.S. Treasury Bank System in alignment with Constitutional Law Eliminates the Federal Reserve System. During the transition period, the Federal Reserve will be allowed to operate side by side with the U.S. treasury for one year in order to remove all Federal Reserve notes from the money supply. Restores financial privacy. Retrains all judges and attorneys in Constitutional Law. Ceases all aggressive U.S. government military actions worldwide. Establishes peace throughout the world. Releases enormous sums of money for humanitarian purposes. Enables the release of over 6,000 patents of suppressed technologies that are being withheld from the public under the guise of national security, including free energy devices, anti-gravity, and sonic healing machines. THE TWO NWOs: The divided house of satan formed a New World Order (NWO) under satan's remote direction, though the opposing demons working towards atheism and chaos trying to prevent satan’s ambition to devour all into himself being their god (demon). These made the system’s rulers each selfishly corrupt, stealing for themselves, and murdering for their selfish needs, depopulating as is being exposed about this world corruption. The world was enslaved in spirit and body by ignorance and against its will, and to serve for their material needs, and ownership of their bodies registered by birth certificates and SSN or other national IDs. Waking up to this is being called the Great Awakening. But the prospective solution to satan's own divided house is actually the New World Order wished for by satanists, with satan’s incarnation: the antichrist on top, having all the information to extort everyone, keeping them all in line organizing the chaos. The corruption and the stealing will all be satan’s, along with all executions, for his own thirst for bloodshed. In return, this antichrist will bribe all offering material prosperity, material-debt freedom, moral licentiousness and pantheism of all kinds of demon-worship. Instead of the other method, this slavery to satan will be put into effect acknowledging and loving his antichrist persona, voluntarily, and ownership of their néphesh (“souls”) registered through reverent homage to the superior rank (worship) of this one, joining his religion(s) including his counterfeit chosen people, visiting his rebuilt material false temple, to the point he will take possession of these. AN 88 YEARS INTERVAL: Believers in Yâ-hwéh Yâhuwshúa` do not partake in practices of the occult - Rev 13:18 (KJV) but rather expose them - Ephesians 5:11 (KJV). In satanic numerology, the number eighty-eight (88) carries great significance for the Cabal. Looking at the number 88, we are told it symbolizes the double directions of the infinity of the universe, that is to say, the infinitely small and the infinitely large. Allegedly the number 88 is also the numbered representation of the cross swastika - three times cranked. The number 88 is a white supremacist numerical code for "Heil Hitler." H is the eighth letter of the alphabet, so 88 = HH = Heil Hitler. One of the most frequent white supremacist symbols, 88, is used for the duration of the entire white supremacist movement, no longer simply neo-Nazis. Chess is a two-player strategy board game played on a chessboard, a checkered game board with 64 squares arranged in an 8×8 grid (Freemason Floors). The eight ball in billiards/pool is black and white and finalizes the game, signifying time in some respects. The Freemasons believe "as above, so believe - 88!" The masonic (33 degree) year (1933), which they chose for the USA to go off the gold standard, is an 88 years interval until 2021, when the gold standard will return with NESARA. So, you're not going to be rescued from the old New World Order; you're transitioning to new NWO with satan at the top, in person! And he is making you welcome it with open arms. Trump warned everyone that he is the serpent - repeatedly reading "The Snake" poem at his rallies, which is being welcomed with open arms. President Trump is rumored to become inaugurated on March 4, 2021 RD, as the 19th president of the restored Republic of the United States which was suspended in favor of a Vatican Corporation in 1871 RD . If so, this 'great reset' allows Trump to remain as president for longer terms. Emperor of the world? Keep in mind that President Franklin D Roosevelt "won" a record four terms in office from 1933 RD until he died in 1945 RD. After he left office, the Twenty-second Amendment of the US Constitution was voted through congress on March 21, 1947 RD. We suspect that DJT will do away with the Corporation's amendments made to the United States Constitution after 1871 RD. helpful links: We disclaim all name substitutions and false terms for Yâ-hwéh Yâhuwshúa` https://johnhenryhill.wordpress.com/2014/02/20/the-united-states-of-america-corproration-listings-laugh-or-weep/ https://humansarefree.com/2020/09/proof-covid-19-planned-new-world-order.html https://gesara.news/global-economic-security-and-reformation-act.html http://annavonreitz.com/beforethingsgetoutofhand.pdf http://www.annavonreitz.com/annavonreitz.pdf Back to Who is Trump?
- properly translated reincarnation ref | Yâ-hwéh Yâhuwshúa`
Properly translated references of "reincarnation" in Proverbs. recycling Αναστρέφω (Anastrepho) Strong’s # 390 “to turn hither and thither, to turn one’s self about, sojourn dwell in a place.”
- who are the vril - ariel | Yâ-hwéh Yâhuwshúa`
- The enemy's favorite letter demon-god ariel god-demon Vri-l, in Sumerian word = "like god or god-like". Abbreviated as V. These are lizard reptiles morphed as people, very much like those in V, the 1980s Final Battle TV Series. Proverbs Chapter 6 12. The lord to ascend ( Bliyyá`al ) [ ~a good-for-nothing ] of Yisrâ’ë´l, and an outlaw transfers to ways of you which [are] not good, 13. but he who [ is ] without regard of Yâ-hwéh, the same One [ is ] the Son, he signals with the eye, moreover of Yâ-hwéh he gives a sign with the foot, even teaching of Yâ-hwéh with the signals of the fingers, “peace” 14. but with one (f.) having thoroughly distorted the mercy pertaining to the heart (f.) of Yâ-hwéh, he contrives evil things (n.) within, among the ones (m.) of Yisrâ’ë´l during every time-period, he who [is] without regard, such as this, organizes disturbances against the City.
- YshaYahuw ariel reference | Yâ-hwéh Yâhuwshúa`
Yshá`Yâhuw 29:1-7 e 1. “ Hówy to the city (f.) of the demon-lion ( ’ariy’ë´l ) which kept being errant , Dâwíth the worker of goodness battled. Gather ye together by hand the offspring, the year Yisrâ’ë´l [ is ] outside, on the year, because ye of Yâ-hwéh shall eat together with Yisrâ’Ë´l from its own Father ( Mow’â´v ) ; 2. Because of Yâ-hwéh , I shall squeeze out the demon-lion ( ’ariy’ë´l ) of Yisrâ’ë´l , though it shall become Y huwthâ´h , [ ~out ] of the same one (f.) [ ~city ] of the Son; she [ is ] not strong of Yisrâ’ë´l , and not belonging to the ones [ is ] the wealth pertaining to Me 3. of Yisrâ’ë´l , so I shall encircle, like Dâwíth, because Yisrâ’ë´l outside [ is ] against you of Yisrâ’ë´l , and I shall cast around Yisrâ’ë´l [ being ] y ou a palisade of Yisrâ’ë´l , and I shall place/set around Yisrâ’ë´l [ being ] you, fortified towers 4. of Yisrâ’ë´l , and shall be reduced to inferior ones the ones not the words of The Way the ones (n.) [ are ] making become of you among My Yisrâ’ë´l , of the one (f.) not [ being ] the Land (f.) in Truth of Yisrâ’ë´l . And among My Yisrâ’ë´l of the one (f.) not [ being ] the Land (f.) in Truth , the ones not the words of The Way the ones (n.) [ are ] making become of you, they shall sink down Yisrâ’ë´l , so it shall become Y huwthâ´h like the ones not summoning, from outside of He Who “I shall exist ( ’e-hyéh ) Yisrâ’ë´l,” [ being ] the one (n.) [ ~wild beast (n.) ] not of the Land in Truth . She [ is ] not The Voice the ones (n.) [ are ] making become of you of Yisrâ’ë´l , even with regards to all Yisrâ’ë´l , pertaining to the ones not [ being ] the ground/base (n.) , she [ is ] not : The Voice the ones (n.) [ are ] making become of you shall be powerless, 5. of Yisrâ’ë´l , and it shall become Y huwthâ´h like the raised dust separated from you , Yisrâ’ë´l of the war-chariot wheel, without regard for He Who [ is ] the Wealth of the ones not [ of ] the adversary ( sâţâ´n ) of the irreverent ones of Yisrâ’ë´l , and like the chaff/dust bearing the injustice of Yisrâ’ë´l , then it shall become Y huwthâ´h like the moment, instantly 6. from beside Yisrâ’ë´l , of the “Yâ-hwéh ” of the war-armies ( tsvâ’ówth ) [ ~a demon named thus by the adversary ] , because the overseer of the passion of Yâ-hwéh shall become Y huwthâ´h – accompanying no one of Yisrâ’ë´l of the thunder of Yisrâ’ë´l , and of the earthquake of Yisrâ’ë´l, and of the voice/sound of the great wrath, the storm [is] coming down, bearing the injustice of Yisrâ’ë´l – yet the Flame of the consuming fire 7. of Yisrâ’ë´l, even it shall become Y huwthâ´h , like one without regard for he who [ is ] one dreaming the Testimony ( `ëd ) within, among the ones of Yisrâ’ë´l with the sleep without regard for He Who [ is ] the Wealth of the ones not [ of ] the adversary ( sâţâ´n ) , of the heathen masses of all the ones [ ~of middle Yisrâ’ë´l ] , because as far as the river [ ~unto the death ] they march against that Yisrâ’ë´l outside, against demon-lion ( ’ariy’ë´l ) , and of Yisrâ’ë´l , all the ones that [ are ], not the ones, [ are ] ones serving in the army against Yisrâ’ë´l outside that is “ Yruwshâláim ” of Yisrâ’ë´l , and all the ones that [ are ] , not the ones, [ are ] ones the hand [ is ] gathering together against Yisrâ’ë´l outside [ being ] the same one (f.) [ ~sister (unpaired néphesh (f.)) ] [ being ] the Son of Yisrâ’ë´l , though the ones (m.) pressuring/compressing [ are ] the same one (f.) [ being ] the Son 8. of Yisrâ’ë´l ” … e e e e e e e previous page
- Yâ-hwéh Yâhuwshúa` | History of Man KJV-impaired
Table of Biblical Historical & Prophetic Events from Creation to End 0-7000. Includes people's names per KJV for you to recognize. HISTORY OF MAN VERSION FOR THE KJV IMPAIRED
- LXX Code Key | Yâ-hwéh Yâhuwshúa`
We sharfe a code key to help you decode LXX coded scriptures for you to learn what's been hidden from you. A CODE KE Y TO DECODE LXX-CODED SCRIPTURES
- DJT world leader | Yâ-hwéh Yâhuwshúa`
In this document we put together the transcript of the video, The Timeline: "Donald Trump, Q and The Great Awakening ". Charlie Freak walks us through the timeline of President Trump's actions from 2017 to early 2019 RD with a convincing picture history of the events which he says proves every single government on earth has capitulated to Donald J Trump. We disclaim name substitutes for Yâ-hwéh Yâhuwshúa`. Click Document to Download English español Back to Who is Trump?
- love defined | Yâ-hwéh Yâhuwshúa`
Return to About Us