Report any issue with "No results found"

Uncover codices terminology from first-century believers, what Yâ-hwéh Yâhuwshúa` taught untranslated by scholars. Gnostic Glossary Understanding Gnostic Scriptures Codices BACK TO TOP Helpful Sources & Links (not cited in glossary): T. Desmond Alexander (Editor), David W. Baker Dictionary of the Old Testament: Pentateuch: A Compendium of Contemporary David Lyle Jeffrey, A Dictionary of Biblical Tradition in English Literature Gesenius Thesaurus PhiloCriticoVT. Lat.ed.1835. LexHebChaldOTS. Tregelles.1857.4vols. Flavius Josephus of the Antiquities of the Jews The Hebrew Word הממך and the Root d-m-m I ("To Be Silent") Ha’adam: Adam, man or human - The Importance of Interpretation in Biblical Translation - A pro-graduate thesis page 26 The Hebraic-Roots Version Scriptures - Revised Edition Containing The Tanak and Ketuvim Netzarim An Original Translation Made Directly from Ancient Hebrew and Aramaic Sources https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/87cb/c4dd0d085aa76b1b4f88676c5de08a70b30f.pdf https://d.iogen.es/d/ http://www.abarim-publications.com/Meaning/Adam.html https://www.jstor.org/stable/1454236?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents http://www.perseus.tufts.edu/hopper/resolveform http://stephanus.tlg.uci.edu/lsj/#eid=1&context=lsj https://www.laparola.net/greco/ http://archimedes.fas.harvard.edu/pollux/ https://www.ibiblio.org/bgreek/resources/abbott-smith.html http://www.newadvent.org/cathen/01129a.htm https://drmsh.com/adam-adam/ http://gnosis.org/naghamm/nhl.html https://www.behindthename.com/name/adam https://margmowczko.com/human-man-woman-genesis-2/ MATTER DOES NOT MATTER; ONLY YÂ-HWÉH YÂHUWSHÚA` ’S REALITY MATTERS

Interlinear View for Reincarnation Hebrews 27 The way the KJV (in green font) is worded in its translation appears to support their contention, examine it in context: 24 For Christ is not entered into the holy places made with hands, which are the figures of the true; but into heaven itself, now to appear in the presence of God for us: 25 Nor yet that he should offer himself often, as the high priest entereth into the holy place every year with blood of others; 26 For then must he often have suffered since the foundation of the world: but now once in the end of the world hath he appeared to put away sin by the sacrifice of himself. 27 And as it is appointed unto men once to die, but after this the judgment: 28 So Christ was once offered to bear the sins of many; and unto them that look for him shall he appear the second time without sin unto salvation. (emphasis added) Since the English flows, by design, readers assume there are no conflicts in its translation and fail to suspect any problem. But this is far from the truth. But even a layperson, using a good concordance and applying the principle of the importance of the broader context to the proper interpretation of a passage, quickly discovers that the correct translation and interpretation are as follows: First, there’s the standard wrong nomenclature: “God” means Fortune-distributor in Hebrew, and it means the same as “Demon” does in Greek. Christ is a transliteration of a Greek term meaning “Greased one” trying to say Anointed One in English. “holy” is derived from “hëylë´l,” which means foolish boaster in Hebrew, and refers to the “day-star” and appears as “Lucifer” in the KJV. “Sacrifice” means offering to “sakra,” which is another name used to worship the “day-star.” Second, correcting for those, when one looks under the hood at what they did with the Greek, it becomes apparent that the translators did NOT translate it accurately into English, nor in a logical way. They translated it into something that could FIT with their beliefs. To begin to examine and proofread their KJV, we put here the same verses in Greek, with their Strong’s numbers and parsing. When translating, each term has a range of possible meanings, and the correct meaning is chosen by the context and using logic, which means resonance with the Truth . With this Greek, we include the English meaning of each term, according to the parsing, which is easily verifiable looking it up in lexicons such as that in the Strong’s concordance. We put the KJV’s most important wrongly translated terms in green font here, and explain between each verse what is wrong with the KJV and why. 24 (BYZ) ου <3756> {PRT-N } γαρ <1063> {CONJ } (because not) εις <1519> {PREP } (into) χειροποιητα <5499> {A-APN } (handmade) αγια <40> {A-APN } (“pure places”) εισηλθεν <1525> (5627) {V-2AAI-3S )  (did enter) ο <3588> {T-NSM } (He Who [is]) χριστος <5547> {N-NSM } (the Anointed One) αντιτυπα <499> {A-APN } (counterparts) των <3588> {T-GPN } (of the ones) αληθινων <228> {A-GPN } (of the true ones) αλλ <235> {CONJ } (rather) εις <1519> {PREP } (into) αυτον <846> {P-ASM } (the same one [being]) τον <3588> {T-ASM } (the One [being]) ουρανον <3772> {N-ASM } (heaven) νυν <3568> {ADV } (now) εμφανισθηναι <1718> (5683) {V-APN } (to manifest Himself) τω <3588> {T-DSN } (with the One) {omitted} προσωπω <4383> {N-DSN } (with the external appearance) {in the presence} του <3588> {T-GSM } (of the One) θεου <2316> {N-GSM } (of the Power) υπερ <5228> {PREP } (on behalf) ημων <1473> {P-1GP } (of us,) “ In the presence of God ” vs. “with the One with the external appearance of the One of the Power ” – There is no word “in” in the Greek here, it is not in the dative case either. The dative case is used like translating the Hebrew preposition ל, but “in” is ב. And Strong’s #4383 lexicons definitions do not include the meaning “presence.” The omission of the rest of the phrase, combined with these mistranslations deny the meaning that Yâhuwshúa` IS Yâ-hwéh because He is the Personhood being the Sovereign within Yâ-hwéh and the Power is His own Greatness. KJV changes the meaning to Him merely entering a place where “God” is, a plausibly separate person, and in fact, being a real term for the adversary. 25 (BYZ) ουδ <3761> {CONJ-N } (but not) ινα <2443> {CONJ } (in order that) πολλακις <4178> {ADV } (frequently) προσφερη <4374> (5725) {V-PAS-3S } (He should bring) {he should offer} εαυτον <1438> {F-3ASM } (Himself) ωσπερ <5618> {ADV } (as however much) ο <3588> {T-NSM } (he who [is]) αρχιερευς <749> {N-NSM } (the high priest) εισερχεται <1525> (5736) {V-PNI-3S } (enters) εις <1519> {PREP } (into) τα <3588> {T-APN } (the ones [being]) αγια <40> {A-APN } (“pure places”) {holy place} κατ <2596> {PREP } (according to) ενιαυτον <1763> {N-ASM } (the year) εν <1722> {PREP } (within) {omitted} αιματι <129> {N-DSN } (with the bloodshed) {with blood} αλλοτριω <245> {A-DSN } (belonging to another) {of others} “ he should offer ” vs. “He should bring” Himself – KJV chose to translate Strong’s #4374 as “offer” and not “bring” thinking Yâhuwshúa` had Himself killed as an offering to the Father. This is wrong, Yâhuwshúa` had His dirt-body killed as a RANSOM for sâţâ´n, not for the Father. “ with blood of others ” vs. “with the bloodshed belonging to another” – “blood” in both Hebrew and Greek also means “bloodshed.” And notice how KJV makes plural “others,” without any basis. The case is dative, not genitive, so “of” is wrong, also. KJV could not explain the fact that bloodshed belongs to the adversary, one, not plural, information coded away in 1 Moshéh ( Genesis ) 9: 4-5 and 2 Moshéh ( Exodus ) 20: 13. “ holy place ” vs. “pure places” – Besides the fact that “holy” is a hëylë´l derivative invoking the day-star of the adversary, the foolish boaster, notice the KJV makes this singular baselessly when this is plural. The reason it’s supposed to be plural is because since every chosen one of Yisrâ’ë´l is made with a separate place within reserved for Him, Yâhuwshúa`’s emanation, to indwell, making us His living temples (“capacitors” is what the Hebrew term for “temple” means), we are plural, not singular. Every material so-called temple building made by hands is for the adversary, not inhabited by Yâ-hwéh Yâhuwshúa`. 26 (BYZ) επει <1893> {CONJ } (since then) εδει <1163> (5707) {V-IAI-3S } (it would have been necessary for) αυτον <846> {P-ASM } (Him) πολλακις <4178> {ADV } (frequently) παθειν <3958> (5629) {V-2AAN } (to suffer) απο <575> {PREP } (from) καταβολης <2602> {N-GSF } (of the foundation) κοσμου <2889> {N-GSM } (of the material universe) νυν <3568> {ADV } δε <1161> {CONJ } (but now) απαξ <530> {ADV } (once only) επι <1909> {PREP } (over) {in} συντελεια <4930> {N-DSF } (the completion) {the end} των <3588> {T-GPM } (of the Ones) {omitted} αιωνων <165> {N-GPM } (of the eternal ones) {of the world} εις <1519> {PREP } (for) αθετησιν <115> {N-ASF } (the abolition) αμαρτιας <266> {N-GSF } (of the error) {sin} δια <1223> {PREP } (by means of) της <3588> {T-GSF } (one’s) {omitted} θυσιας <2378> {N-GSF } (of the slaughter) {the sacrifice} αυτου <846> {P-GSM } (of the same One) {of himself} πεφανερωται <5319> (5769) {V-RPI-3S } (He has been made manifest) {he appeared [put too early in sentence] } “ in the end of the world ” vs. “over the completion of the Ones of the eternal ones” – KJV interpreted the Greek to express the TIME when He appeared to “sacrifice himself”, when Strong’s #1909 epi does not mean “in” nor “during”, and though it can mean “at”, note that Yâhuwshúa` was crucified in the year 4000 out of 7000 total years allotted for this material universe, and 4000 is hardly “ the end of the world ”. Strong’s #4930 means either completion or consummation, and not “end”. But since Strong’s #165 is referring to “the eternal ones”, not “the ages” (a mistranslation of the same Hebrew term), the purpose of Yâhuwshúa`’s Work on the cross was the completion not the consummation of these eternal ones, His chosen. But KJV went farther and interpreted “the ages” as “the world” when adding the stretched meaning of “ the end of the world ”. “ sin ” vs. “of the error” – Strong’s #266 means error/mistake, “sin” is a neologism highly laden with tradition, and the error/mistake meaning is lost. It being singular here in the Greek, and “sin” being implied to be plural is a mistake for the KJV. And KJV did not understand that the error is the adversary himself, as an error made by his mother, Wisdom, without the Father. Yâhuwchânâ´n’s Glad Tidings (“ John ”) 12: 31 says Yâhuwshúa` declared then to be “ …a Judgment trial of this world: now the ruler ( archon ) of this world shall be ejected out. ” This consequence was delayed by the adversary begging for a delay in paying what he owes, so this event is scheduled later in the 7000 years. “ by the sacrifice of himself ” vs. “by means of the one’s slaughter of the same One” – the omission of translating Strong’s #3588 “one’s”, KJV makes Yâhuwshúa`’s slaughter to be a suicide. Since we saw in verse 25 that it is sâţâ´n to whom bloodshed belongs, and scripture explains that Yehuwthâ´h/sâţâ´n was who murdered Yâhuwshúa` without justification because He did nothing wrong, removing sâţâ´n from the statement is wrong. “ he appeared ” [at the beginning of the sentence] vs. “He has been made manifest” – KJV makes Yâhuwshúa` appear in order “ to put away sin ”. This makes little if any sense. The scripture is saying that “by means of the adversary’s slaughter of Yâhuwshúa`, He has been made manifest.” How? Because His mortal dirt-body was given up for Him to be made manifest to be Who He really is, How He really is. Not merely to “put away sin”. The abolition of the error is to make possible the completion of the eternal ones, the chosen ones, because getting rid of the fiery one of the flesh, the incorporated stowaway emanation of the adversary, will prevent stumbling any more in these, when these are completed as fully fledged sons of Yâ-hwéh, each being Him, the Anointed One. Thus the KJV has misrendered this sentence reorganizing it. 27 (BYZ) και <2532> {CONJ } (and) καθ <2596> {PREP } (according to) οσον <3745> {K-ASN } (how many) {omitted} αποκειται <606> (5736) {V-PNI-3S } (He reserves for Himself) {is appointed} τοις <3588> {T-DPM } (to the ones) {omitted} ανθρωποις <444> {N-DPM } (belonging to the sons of the dirt-man (’âthâ´m)) {men} απαξ <530> {ADV } (once only) αποθανειν <599> (5629) {V-2AAN } (to die off) μετα <3326> {PREP } δε <1161> {CONJ } (but amidst) {but after} τουτο <3778> {D-ASN } (this thing [is]) κρισις <2920> {N-NSF } (the separation/selection) {judgment} “ as it is appointed ” vs. “according to how many He reserves for Himself” – KJV omits translating Strong’s #3745 “how many” completely and mistranslates Strong’s #606 as “it is appointed”, a meaning being a stretch of “it is reserved”, a Headless statement, but when understanding “He reserves for Himself” and including “how many”, this violates the KJV Christian tradition that the entire cosmos will be saved, and puts a finite number on how many will be saved, something clearly expressed in codices. “ unto men ” vs. “to the ones belonging to the sons of the dirt-man (’âthâ´m) ” – KJV omitted “to the ones” simply because it did not understand that there are unauthorized archon riders in the separated place meant to be pure of as yet nonbelieving middle Yisrâ’ë´l, Christians with the wrong name for Yâhuwshúa`. The “sons of” is found in the Aramaic translations and is logical to include. And the Hebrew term usually translated to Strong’s #444 anthropos is ’âthâ´m , meaning dirt-man, but 1 Moshéh (Genesis) 3: 20 spiritually defines dirt-men as being the ones of Yisrâ’ë´l NOT being a servant of the name, yet. This clearly defines a subgroup of how many He reserves for Himself as these Christians with the wrong name for Yâhuwshúa`, not having Him indwelling, having unauthorized archon riders in their separated places. All this meaning is lost in KJV. Then the “ once to die ” takes on an entirely different meaning in the KJV: to be “ appointed unto men once to die ” when it’s really saying: of how many He reserves for Himself, He has been made manifest to the archon-riders belonging to the Christians with the wrong name to die off. “ but after this, the judgment ” vs. “but amidst this thing, [is] the separation/selection” – KJV chose the mistaken possible meaning of Strong’s #3326 meta because it thinks that these men are dying all throughout history, just once, never to return in another body, going to heaven or hell permanently. It missed the message that these wrong-name servants die off when He manifests to them, at the Sixth Seal in Disclosure (Revelation), and their fiery one dies, which is at the helm in them in their separate place, without which their body dies since they do not have Yâhuwshúa` dwelling in them. So KJV thinks the next thing newly dead men do is wait until the end time judgment. KJV loves translating Strong’s #2920 krisis as “ judgment ” and worse. Although more acceptable lexicon definitions of it are separation, selection, before judgment, KJV translates it as judgment 41 times, damnation 3 times, accusation 2 times, and condemnation 2 times, none as separation or selection. When Yâhuwshúa` manifests to His chosen at the Sixth Seal, it is in order to separate the living from the dead , and this means the emanations of sâţâ´n in these dirt-bodies will die off, as He also got rid of the one in His dirt-body very early, according to codices. This happening in the chosen is at the same time as in the dirt-men wrong-name servants, so “after” is mistaken, it’s “amidst”. So, the 144,000 do survive this becoming fully-fledged sons of Yâ-hwéh. 28 (BYZ) ουτως <3779> {ADV } (thus [is]) και <2532> {CONJ } (also) {omitted} ο <3588> {T-NSM } (he) χριστος <5547> {N-NSM } (the anointed One) απαξ <530> {ADV } (once only) προσενεχθεις <4374> (5685) {V-APP-NSM } (having been brought to Him) {was offered} εις <1519> {PREP } (for) το <3588> {T-ASN } (the One) πολλων <4183> {A-GPM } (of the many ones) ανενεγκειν <399> (5629) {V-2AAN } (to carry up) {to bear} αμαρτιας <266> {N-APF } (the errors) εκ <1537> {PREP } (outside) {omitted} δευτερου <1208> {A-GSN } (of the second time) χωρις <5565> {ADV } (separated apart) {without} αμαρτιας <266> {N-GSF } (of the error) {sin} οφθησεται <3708> (5701) {V-FPI-3S } (He shall be seen) τοις <3588> {T-DPM } (belonging to the ones) {unto them} αυτον <846> {P-ASM } ([being] Him) απεκδεχομενοις <553> (5740) {V-PNP-DPM } (the ones being patiently waited for) {that look for him} εις <1519> {PREP } (for) σωτηριαν <4991> {N-ASF } (the deliverance.) “ So Christ was once offered ” vs. “thus [is] also he the anointed One, once only, having been brought to Him,” – KJV simply omitted “also”, unable to reconcile it, that the selection, the chosen ones, the firtfruits 144,000 are ALSO the anointed One, when this has happened. These become Him when these are filled and fully-fledged, and the fiery one is dead and gone, though being still in a dirt-body. These then are given to the many of Yisrâ’ë´l outside Him, known as “heathen masses” and “peoples” and “languages” and “tribes,” as His witnesses. These many were categorized in two groups, the beast of the Land and the beast of the sea, in other scriptures, thus to these two are given His witnesses, not that there are only two witnesses (see Disclosure 11). KJV also again chose the wrong meaning for Strong’s #4374, because for the chosen to become the anointed One, obviously they must have already been brought to Him. “ to bear the sins of many ” vs. “for the One to carry up the errors of the many ones outside” – KJV omits “for the One”, thinking it’s redundant, but it’s Yâhuwshúa` within the chosen Who will do within His sealed witnesses the same as He did Himself, carry up the errors of the many ones outside, up to the Father. KJV also omits “outside” and “up,” effectively leaving Yâhuwshúa` carrying the sin permanently. “ shall he appear the second time without sin unto salvation ” vs. “Of the second time, separated apart of the error He shall be seen, belonging to the ones [being] Him, the ones being patiently waited for, for the deliverance.” – KJV felt free to rearrange this, but that affected its meaning: KJV makes it seem Yâhuwshúa` appeared the first time WITH sin, entirely wrong. As mentioned earlier, the adversary, the spawn of shame (Yaldabaoth) is the error; misrepresenting himself as our Savior, by this second time He appears, Yâhuwshúa` will appear to all Yisrâ’ë´l of that day, with these all having NO fiery emanation within them, so it’s separated apart from the error, and He shall be seen to belong to the ones being Him, the ones being patiently waited for. “the ones ” is a code term found frequently throughout decoded scripture to refer to these, but omitted from establishment translations as their standard method of translating Greek. “ unto salvation ” vs. “for the deliverance” – KJV’s enigmatic “unto” is another mind-bender, and the lack of an article which is implied in Greek makes it even more difficult, making it seem like it not being a fixed scheduled moment in time. The result of this is Christian traditions declaring they are already “saved” as soon as they believe their tradition, though they continue dying and erring and don’t even know His real name. KJV Hebrews 9: 27 has thus hidden the real meanings and promoted false traditions at the same time, by falsely mistranslating “ it is appointed unto men once to die ” is the TOTALITY OF SCRIPTURAL TEACHING and since it is prominent in Christian theology, its proponents should be called to task for the numerous discrepancies comparing their beloved KJV translation to the Greek; because scriptures all mention as matters of fact, without elaborate explanations because it was common knowledge. The recycling of the néphesh, the “transmutation” of it, returning back and forth (anastrepho) into separate nativities (generations), and the existing ones who have acknowledged Yâ-hwéh Yâhuwshúa` as doing so again each nativity, being the eternal ones (ages). So, correcting for all these issues in translating Hebrews 9: 24-28, which FPS (Firstfruits Purer Scriptures) calls To the `Ivríym , we include its text here: To the `Ivríym Chapter 9 24. Because not into handmade “pure places” did He Who [is] the Anointed One enter into, counterparts of the ones of the true ones; rather, into the same one [being] the One [being] heaven now, to manifest Himself with the One, with the external appearance of the One of the Power on behalf of us, 25. but not in order that frequently He should bring Himself, as however much he who [is] the high priest enters into the one [being] “pure places” yearly within, with the bloodshed belonging to another; [~sâţâ´n 1 Moshéh 9: 4-5 , 2 Moshéh 20: 13 )] 26. since then it would have necessary for Him frequently to suffer from the founding of the cosmos (material universe) . But now, once only , over the completion of the Ones of the eternal ones, for the abolition of the error [Yâhuwchânâ´n’s Glad Tidings 12: 31 ], by means of the one’s [~ the error’s (sâţâ´n/Yehuwthâ´h) ] slaughter of the same One, He has been made manifest, 27. and according to how many He reserves for Himself: [ ~He manifests ] to the ones belonging to the sons of the dirt-man (’âthâ´m) [ ~not servants of the name (1 Moshéh 3: 20 )], once only, to die off, but amidst this thing, [is] the separation/selection [ ~144,000 ] [ ~at Sixth Seal ] 28. thus [is] also he [ ~of the selection ] the anointed One, once only , having been brought to Him, for the One ‘ to carry up the errors of the many ones’ outside [ ~outside Yisrâ’ë´l – times of the witnesses ] [Yshá`Yâhuw 53: 12 ]. Of the second time, separated apart of the error He shall be seen, belonging to the ones [being] Him, the ones being patiently waited for, for the deliverance.

The divided house of satan formed a New World Order (NWO) under satan's remote direction. So, you're not going to be rescued from the old NWO; you're transitioning to a new NWO. TWO TYPES OF (PHYSICAL) NEW WORLD ORDERS GLOBALIST ELITIST KHAZARIAN MAFIA The United States went off the gold standard in 1933 Running as a 'Corporation of the USA' with foreign entities on foreign soil (Washington DC) Global Poverty Global Hunger World slavery (spiritual & material) Global Asset Relocation Income Tax & Property Tax Cashless Society Disarmament of Citizens Removal of the "god" gene Depopulation Concentration Camps satan-worshiping (cannibalism, pedophilia, children sacrifice, etc.) The Great Reset DONALD JOHN TRUMP ANTICHRIST Potentially zeros out all credit card, mortgage, and other bank debt due to illegal banking and government activities. This is the Federal Reserve’s worst nightmare, a “jubilee” or a forgiveness of debt. Abolishes the income tax. Abolishes the IRS. Employees of the IRS will be transferred into the US Treasury national sales tax area. Creates a 14% flat rate for non-essential new items, only sales tax revenue for the government. In other words, food and medicine will not be taxed or used items such as old homes. Increases benefits to senior citizens. Returns Constitutional Law to all courts and legal matters. Installs the original Title of Nobility amendment. Establishes new Presidential and Congressional elections within 120 days after NESARA's announcement. The interim government will cancel all National Emergencies and return us back to constitutional law. Monitors elections and prevents illegal election activities of special interest groups. Creates a new U.S. Treasury rainbow currency backed by gold, silver, and platinum precious metals, ending the bankruptcy of the United States initiated by Franklin Roosevelt in 1933. Forbids the sale of American birth certificate records as chattel property bonds by the US Department of Transportation. Initiates new U.S. Treasury Bank System in alignment with Constitutional Law Eliminates the Federal Reserve System. During the transition period, the Federal Reserve will be allowed to operate side by side with the U.S. treasury for one year in order to remove all Federal Reserve notes from the money supply. Restores financial privacy. Retrains all judges and attorneys in Constitutional Law. Ceases all aggressive U.S. government military actions worldwide. Establishes peace throughout the world. Releases enormous sums of money for humanitarian purposes. Enables the release of over 6,000 patents of suppressed technologies that are being withheld from the public under the guise of national security, including free energy devices, anti-gravity, and sonic healing machines. THE TWO NWOs: The divided house of satan formed a New World Order (NWO) under satan's remote direction, though the opposing demons working towards atheism and chaos trying to prevent satan’s ambition to devour all into himself being their god (demon). These made the system’s rulers each selfishly corrupt, stealing for themselves, and murdering for their selfish needs, depopulating as is being exposed about this world corruption. The world was enslaved in spirit and body by ignorance and against its will, and to serve for their material needs, and ownership of their bodies registered by birth certificates and SSN or other national IDs. Waking up to this is being called the Great Awakening. But the prospective solution to satan's own divided house is actually the New World Order wished for by satanists, with satan’s incarnation: the antichrist on top, having all the information to extort everyone, keeping them all in line organizing the chaos. The corruption and the stealing will all be satan’s, along with all executions, for his own thirst for bloodshed. In return, this antichrist will bribe all offering material prosperity, material-debt freedom, moral licentiousness and pantheism of all kinds of demon-worship. Instead of the other method, this slavery to satan will be put into effect acknowledging and loving his antichrist persona, voluntarily, and ownership of their néphesh (“souls”) registered through reverent homage to the superior rank (worship) of this one, joining his religion(s) including his counterfeit chosen people, visiting his rebuilt material false temple, to the point he will take possession of these. AN 88 YEARS INTERVAL: Believers in Yâ-hwéh Yâhuwshúa` do not partake in practices of the occult - Rev 13:18 (KJV) but rather expose them - Ephesians 5:11 (KJV). In satanic numerology, the number eighty-eight (88) carries great significance for the Cabal. Looking at the number 88, we are told it symbolizes the double directions of the infinity of the universe, that is to say, the infinitely small and the infinitely large. Allegedly the number 88 is also the numbered representation of the cross swastika - three times cranked. The number 88 is a white supremacist numerical code for "Heil Hitler." H is the eighth letter of the alphabet, so 88 = HH = Heil Hitler. One of the most frequent white supremacist symbols, 88, is used for the duration of the entire white supremacist movement, no longer simply neo-Nazis. Chess is a two-player strategy board game played on a chessboard, a checkered game board with 64 squares arranged in an 8×8 grid (Freemason Floors). The eight ball in billiards/pool is black and white and finalizes the game, signifying time in some respects. The Freemasons believe "as above, so believe - 88!" The masonic (33 degree) year (1933), which they chose for the USA to go off the gold standard, is an 88 years interval until 2021, when the gold standard will return with NESARA. So, you're not going to be rescued from the old New World Order; you're transitioning to new NWO with satan at the top, in person! And he is making you welcome it with open arms. Trump warned everyone that he is the serpent - repeatedly reading "The Snake" poem at his rallies, which is being welcomed with open arms. President Trump is rumored to become inaugurated on March 4, 2021 RD, as the 19th president of the restored Republic of the United States which was suspended in favor of a Vatican Corporation in 1871 RD . If so, this 'great reset' allows Trump to remain as president for longer terms. Emperor of the world? Keep in mind that President Franklin D Roosevelt "won" a record four terms in office from 1933 RD until he died in 1945 RD. After he left office, the Twenty-second Amendment of the US Constitution was voted through congress on March 21, 1947 RD. We suspect that DJT will do away with the Corporation's amendments made to the United States Constitution after 1871 RD. helpful links: We disclaim all name substitutions and false terms for Yâ-hwéh Yâhuwshúa` https://johnhenryhill.wordpress.com/2014/02/20/the-united-states-of-america-corproration-listings-laugh-or-weep/ https://humansarefree.com/2020/09/proof-covid-19-planned-new-world-order.html https://gesara.news/global-economic-security-and-reformation-act.html http://annavonreitz.com/beforethingsgetoutofhand.pdf http://www.annavonreitz.com/annavonreitz.pdf Back to Who is Trump?

'Elohiym is a specific name of a demon progeny emanation of sâtâ´n (adversary). 'EL OHIYM IS NOT MY YÂ-HWÉH Satanic Names Substitutes Misidentify Who We Worship Elohim Wrongly Inserted Into in The Torah (Law) XXX Elohim (Strong's #430) , the plural form of the singular noun elo'ah (Strong's #433 ) , a masculine noun xxxx [ Disclaimer : In this document in which we expose the foreign demons’ terms ’el, ’eloah , and ’elohiym , we quote others using the term “god” although we do not use this term ourselves for the Most High Yâ-hwéh, because “ god ” is also a term literally meaning “demon” in Hebrew.] Historical Evidence The first one to discuss of the distinction between Yâ-hwéh, usually “translated” the LORD , and elohim , traditionally “translated” as god , was their Rabbi Judah “Yehuda” Halevi, 12th Century A.D, in his book The Kuzari . At the beginning of the fourth part of his book, Judah exposes something unbelievable that precedes all modern academic scholarship researched-information on the subject-term ‘elohim.’ Yehuda tells us that the term ‘elohim’ is not original to their traditions as Yehuwdiym Jews rather that the term comes from the pagan world. Their “Rabbi” Yehuda Halevi, a revered philosophical teacher by Jews, points out that the pagan word ‘elohim’ is plural as it refers to forces or powers of nature; while the name Yâ-hwéh was unknown to them because of their tradition to not pronounce His names. So as a result, these followers of the Torah (Law) did not know how to pronounce the name Yâ-hwéh. The Jews Only Said the Name Yâ-hwéh Once a Year Scholars tend to agree that ‘Yâ-hwéh’ is a representation of how the ancient sons of Israel initially pronounced the Tetragrammaton (Four-letter word) , called “Barbelo” in codices. According to the Yoma and the Mishnah , the commentaries on it state that “one does not pronounce the ineffable name outside” – the limits of the material temple. But “on the Day of Atonement, ten times did the high priest pronounce His name”; [The Sacred Name – yahweh.org] this occurred while all the priests who gathered around in the material temple did loud chanting so that the public would not hear His name <> pronounced. Elohim: Adopted From the Pagan World The Kna`aníym polytheistic-pantheistic ‘religion’ which pre-dates Judaism, was borrowed from another belief system and had a history created to give it credibility. The New World Encyclopedia describes the belief system of “divine clan, headed by the supreme god El ; the gods collectively made up the elohim .” El — according to The New World Encyclopedia , was the chief deity, god of the sky, father of many lesser gods and ruler of the divine assembly, also worshiped by the apostatizing sons of Israel. In Ugarit, the gods were called 'ilhm (elohim), or the children of El. Through the centuries, the pantheon of Canaanite gods evolved, so that El and Asherah were more important in earlier times, while Baal and his consorts came to fore in later years. Many of the Kna`aníym deities found their way into the Greek and Roman pantheon. For example, the characteristics of both El and Ba`´al are visible in Zeus . The polytheists and name-substituters used the Greek ‘theos’ as well as the Ivríyth ’el interchangeably whenever they made references to the True Most-High Yâ-hwéh, just as they did to foreign gods as theoi and ’elohim regardless that the terms theos and ’el is a title they used and not a personal name for Yâ-hwéh. Theos: Occurs in the LXX with few exceptions as a translation for the Hebrew word ’elohim and His name Yâ-hwéh. However, morphologically-analyzed decoded LXX shows that every instance of theos was not applied to our Yâ-hwéh although post-advent “New Testament” Greek scriptures DO use theos applied to Yâ-hwéh, never the theoi plural form, confirming that ’elohiym was not found in the Hebrew post-advent original scriptures and this points to a post-advent time being when the term ’elohiym was inserted into Hebrew manuscripts. Theos – Greek translations of Hebrew scriptures correctly translated Hebrew ’Ël to Greek Theos (Strong’s #2304), as both are a generic term for a power/mighty one. Like ’Ël, when not clearly stated to be referring to our Yâ-hwéh, Theos also refers to demons. Yet, Theos is freely used usually as a component of religious Christian terms such as Theology, Theophany, Theocracy, Theosophy, Atheism, etc. A cursory look at the surrounding terms in Greek lexicons will show you that Strong’s #2303 theion is “brimstone”, sulfur, because it was considered “divine incense, because burning brimstone was regarding as having power to purify, and to ward off disease” (OLB Greek Lexicon). Reportedly, Sh’ówl stinks, of sulfur among its other smells, because brimstone is associated with demons. The book of Chanówkh (“Enoch”) also reports (interestingly in chapter 66: 6), this: 6 And when all this happened, from that burning molten mass of metal and from the agitation which troubled them in that place, there arose a strong smell of sulfur, which became mixed with the waters; and that valley where the Watchers, who had been guilty of seduction, burned underneath its soil. Therefore, theos is originally a term referring to these kinds of worshiped entities which are associated to sulfur, demons again. Whenever they made references to the True Most-High Yâ-hwéh, since these singular terms were routinely found in scriptures, the name-substituters used the Greek ‘theos’ as well as the Ivríyth ’el to substitute out His name they despised, regardless that the terms theos and ’el is merely one description they used and not a personal name for Yâ-hwéh. The pluralism of “Elohim” Then the polytheists, just as they pluralized foreign gods as theoi and ’elohim , the polytheist Jewish scribes replaced Yâ-hwéh’s name and most singular ’Ël references with plural ’elohim also. Although Yâ-hwéh is One (’echâth) , a Union, and therefore not plural. In fact, He inhabits those He causes to come to exist, to become within His Union. At the End, when the number of His emanations will be complete A-Z (Alpha through Omega), then He will again become One at the End to do away with darkness. The misunderstanding of this is likely what commenced those erring into polytheism, and it’s easy to see, particularly when the various emanations of Him get materially personified by the errant, and then Wisdom gets worshipped as “Sophia” etc. etc. The Septuagint (LXX) is a Greek translation of pre-advent “Old Testament” scriptures, which was written in the 3rd century BC Roman Date, far before the Masoretic text which was altered after Yâhuwshúa`’s coming. The 70 scribes who translated it hid large amounts of information from the heathen Greeks, hiding it in codes. Today, these codes have been decoded and analyzed, and, with regard to theos, it shows that every instance of theos in it was not applied to Yâ-hwéh, every instance of “Theos” occurring next to Yâ-hwéh (which it substitutes Kurios for), it says “One without regard for the THEOS of ’aharón (light-carrier/lucifer)”, προς {<3364> “not”} θεος {<2> “aaron”} Occasionally “theos” has been seen to be plural, ALSO having <2> for ’aharón (light-carrier/lucifer). The other way “theos” is seen in this decoded LXX is as “not a theos” referring to sâtâ´n, because he is not a true power/mighty one. But in the post-advent “New Testament”, Greek scriptures DO use theos applied to Yâ-hwéh, but never using the theoi plural form, confirming that ’elohiym was not found in the Hebrew scriptures available at that time, and this points to a post-advent time being when the term ’elohiym was inserted into Hebrew manuscripts such as the Masoretic text. Encyclopedias and Other Writings about Elohim Agnōstos Theos Ἄγνωστος Θεός” - was found inscribed on Greek altars dedicated "to the unknown god." The inscription had no mystical or theosophical meaning, but arose out of a concern for religious “cultic safety: no one wanted to incur the wrath of” a god, whose name was unknown, but who might exist vexed by the lack of honors. In their ignorance (agnosticism), the Greeks erected an altar to whatever god they might have inadvertently left out of their pantheon. In the book of Yehuwdâ´h The Gospel of Judas , they call a “Glad Tidings” we read how Yâhuwshúa` corrected the way our brothers, His pupils, praised Him. In one instance Yâhuwshúa` finds them gathered together and seated in reverence to give His Father thanksgiving. Then Yâhuwshúa` laughs at the demons who misguided them to pray in the manner that they did customarily. Had they had the foresight that Who was standing in their midst was Yâ-hwéh within Yâhuwshúa` as One, they would have instead turned their eyes toward Him to praise Him. “The disciples said to [him], “Master, why are you laughing at [our] prayer of thanksgiving? We have done what is right. ” He answered and said to them, “I am not laughing at you. You are not doing this because of your own will but because it is through this that your god [’el] will be praised.” The English translators of this book substituted “god” in the place of theo s and the Greek translators of this Hebrew book had translated ’ël as Greek theos . With this information, reconsider why our Father Yâ-hwéh Yâhuwshúa` taught His pupils, our brothers, a proper way to pray in MattithYâ´huw 6: 9-20, and that is because our brothers, the first on earth to follow Yâhuwshúa`, had been unwittingly worshiping elohiym , because they were heeding something else that was not Him. Since Yâhuwshúa` was not referring to Himself as the god [’ël] they had praised, the term ’ël there is about a demon. The 1966 edition of the Unger’s Bible Dictionary, Page 412, states that the word EL is a Kna`aníym “Canaanite” word meaning “God,” or “Devil.” The Interpreter’s Dictionary of the Bible, Volume 1, Page 817, under DEMONOLOGY, says: The word ELOHIM, (plural form of EL), means “demons” and or “gods", saying that they adopted this plural form, copying the Canaanites to "summarize all the various manifestations of this deity". It is sad to see that more recent reference-books have had such information removed, to revise history in a huge and quiet cover-up conspiracy to make these terms appear entirely acceptable for those researching them, simply because the truth about ’elohíym is that it ALWAYS refers to demons (and perhaps magistrates) and never Yâ-hwéh. Click here to see a screenshot reference in the book. According to the Raelian Movement Professor Katherine Bayer writes, the Elohim are a human-like alien race that created life through material scientific processes on Earth. The Elohim “created humanity as an equal, just as their [own] creators once created them as equals. They claim that through this process, intelligent life continues to develop throughout”. The Raelians claim that only they hold that the correct meaning of the word Elohim , as "those who come from the sky." They believe the more traditional translations of the word are in error. back to top Elohim in Inspired Scripture Codices In the codices we also read more damning condemnations against the term ‘elohim ’: From The End Times of Këph “The Apocalypse of Peter ” - “And the Savior said to me, "Be strong, for you are the one to whom these mysteries have been given, to know them through revelation, that He whom they crucified is the First-born, and a dirt-body [made by means] of demons to dwell in, and the stony vessel in which they dwell [is] of elohim [demons], of the cross, which is under the Law. But He who stands accompanying him is the Living Savior.” – In another codex, Justin’s Baruch, The Three Principle of the All are: “the Good One, Elohim, and Edem (the Earth). The first two are male; the third is female. The Good possesses the knowledge about the All. The word "Elohim" is called the father of what is [materially] created and father of the Jewish god-demiurge. Therefore, we should not capitalize elohiym as it is not a proper name. And again in the “Secret book of Yâhuwchânâ´n John”: “Yal dabaoth raped Eve. She bore two sons. Elohim was the name of the first. Yâ-hwéh was the name of the second. Elohim has a bear’s face. Yâ-hwéh has a cat’s face. One is righteous; One is not. Yâ-hwéh is righteous; Elohim is not.” Note: The Aramaic “Yaldabaoth” (Yaldabosheth in Hebrew) means Sp awn of Shame in English, another term for the adversary who was not acknowledged to be given a formal name at all. We see here satan made “Elohim”, which we have shown above is “not righteous” (correct), as it never should apply to our Yâ-hwéh. Scriptures are interpreted spiritually, not materially. With regards only to the term “righteous”, note it means “correct”. The name “Yâ-hwéh” is correct, but the name “Elohim” is not, because it, being plural, does not apply to our Yâ-hwéh Yâhuwshúa` Who is One, not plural. This passage means satan made a Yâ-hwéh underneath himself, which is not the Yâ-hwéh far over him, Who is Yâhuwshúa`. The adversary "satan" also made many other demons and named them with the same names as those in the highest heavens, and this is why the same scripture says true original ones have two names, as our Yâ-hwéh is Yâ-hwéh Yâhuwshúa`. The accuser also made elohim , which we have shown above is not righteous, as it never should apply to our Yâ-hwéh. "The demons’ (own) names, given by Yaldabaoth, are mighty names But the Powers’ names reflecting the glory above Will bring about the demons’ destruction and remove their Power. That is why each has two names." I have said, ye are gods, and all of you are children of 'elohiym We are not elohiym (demons), we are sons of Yâ-hwéh Yâhuwshúa` and will not violate Yâ-hwéh’s instructions written in our hearts of loving Him more than anything , to not worship the gods, which are elohiym. Our King and Savior revealed Himself to Moshéh as Yâ-hwéh Yâhuwshúa`, and never as Elohim, a fact obliterated out of the heavily altered Masoretic text, but as Yâ-hwéh said, we should not apply name substitutes to Yâ-hwéh, nor create images or anything which honors elohiym, the demons. After examining the widespread common use of the term 'gods' which means ‘demons’ in Greek, we can now see how English-speaking deceived Christians use this specific name of the foreign deity ’elohíym , into applying it to Yâ-hwéh Yâhuwshúa`. I do hope this article blesses you, the reader, to discover that the use of pagan titles did not originate from the first and original, writings. They were, in fact, only accepted by the people of Israel after coming into the material land which was occupied by Kna`aníym, and adopting their wrong terminology, because the Kna`aníym once spoke Ivríyth; however, their worship was of DEMONS. But the terms finding their way into the public-view scriptures themselves had to be after the ascension of Yâhuwshúa`, as the post-advent scriptures still show knowledge of the material omitted in codes by the LXX scribes. Considering how our Father Yâ-hwéh Yâhuwshúa` commands us to honor His names, publish His names, boastfully praise His names - 5th Book of Moshéh Deuteronom y 30: 17-19, only several hundred years later, satan worked his scribes, the ones working , so that our scriptures became polluted and degutted, substituting Yâ-hwéh’s name out with the pagan titles of plurist elohim, adonai, and satan-specific god , and lord . Though at the time, the use of these pagan terms was accepted and routinely used by the name-censoring copyists to replace Yâ-hwéh’s name to identify Him in their writings, they remain nonspecific at best, and at worst, specific for satan. Moreover, these pagan words cannot call on Yâ-hwéh Yâhuwshúa`, the name they forgot and did not prefer, because what they prefer are TITLES of satan and his demons, which they obeyed to alter the scriptures. It is by the intervention of the self-willed-one, the spawn of shame, and lesser god that scholars, who interpret the original Aramaic, Hebrew, and Greek Scriptures into English (and other languages) were led to conspire in the removal of His name Yâ-hwéh altogether, and to hide the name of Yâhuwshúa`, Who defeated him, completely; Their excuse? The one often given for this detestable censorship involves a misinterpretation of the Third Law of satan they made by altering our Yâ-hwéh’s Ten Messages , to say not “take His name in vain.” How then can we openly make praise offerings professing His name (Todah Yâ-hwéh) and how then can we boast about our Yâ-hwéh: (Hal’luw Yâ´hu)? Conclusion: This third law of satan (from the ten commandments) only promotes satan by having people remove specific references to the Most High Yâ-hwéh to forget Him and steal His praise. Therefore, every nonspecific name substitute serves satan unless tied to Yâ-hwéh Yâhuwshúa`’s name, and every name substitute specific for satan, like elohim , should never be used for Yâ-hwéh Yâhuwshúa.` The safest best option is to call Him by His dual names and if one needs to say He is our Power or Sovereign or any other description, such as Father, to keep it in English. Let each one take care, in one’s offering of one’s Testimony, to keep it purely about Yâ-hwéh Yâhuwshúa`, the One without regard for the ’ël or ’elohiym of ’aharon (lucifer/light-carrier), so eliminate elohim and all other deceit of satan. Feel free to watch our video Elohim Are Demons Do not trust a Word from the mouths of anyone who comes in the name of demons, 'elohiym' (El), or any other name-substitutes for Yâ-hwéh Yâhuwshúa` . back to top Bibliography & Source Links: Johnson, Sarah, Religions of the Ancient World, Belknap Press, Cambridge, 2004) Strong, James, Strong’s Exhaustive Concordance of the Bible , Nelson, Nashville, 1990) The Thirteenth Apostle - What the Gospel of Judas Really Says by April D. DeConick The Gospel of Judas Translated by Rodolphe Kasser, Marvin Meyer, and Gregor Wurst, in collaboration with François Gaudard A Dictionary of Christian Biography, Literature, Sects, and Doctrines , Volume 4 The Apocalypse of Baruch: Translated from the Syriac A Dictionary of Gnosticism Paperback – November 17, 2009, by Andrew Phillip Smith Cady, Susan, Marian Ronan, and Hal Taussig. Wisdom's Feast: Sophia in Study and Celebration. New York: Harper & Row, 1989. Camp, Claudia V. Wisdom and the Feminine in the Book of Proverbs . Decatur: Almond, 1985. Cixous, "The Laugh of the Medusa. " The Critical Tradition: Classic Texts and Contemporary Trends. Ed. David H. Richter. Boston: Bedford, 1998. 1453-1471. Irigaray, Luce. "This Sex Which is Not One." The Critical Tradition: Classic Texts and Contemporary Trends. Ed. David H. Richter. Boston: Bedford, 1998. 1466-1471. Johnson, Elizabeth A. "Wisdom Was Made Flesh and Pitched Her Tent Among Us." Reconstructing the Christ Symbol: Essays in Feminist Christology. Ed. Maryanne Stevens. New York: Paulist, 1993. 95-117. Mollenkott, Virginia Ramey. The Divine Feminine . New York: Crossroad, 1984. Newman, Barbara. Sister of Wisdom: St. Hildegard's Theology of the Feminin e. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1987. Whybray, R.N. Wisdom in Proverbs: The Concept of Wisdom in Proverbs 1-9. Naperville: Allenson, 1965. https://brill.com/view/book/9789004296008/B9789004296008-s011.xml http://www.ancient-hebrew.org/dictionary/500.html#430 http://gnosis.org/naghamm/nhl.html https://www.iep.utm.edu/gnostic/ https://www.thoughtco.com/raelian-movement-95694 https://www.encyclopedia.com/environment/encyclopedias-almanacs-transcripts-and-maps/agnostos-theos http://www.newworldencyclopedia.org/entry/Canaanite_Religion https://www.westernseminary.edu/transformedblog/2013/12/09/pronouncing-the-divine-name/ https://worldhistory.us/ancient-history/ancient-near-east/el-and-the-elohim.php http://www.ancient-hebrew.org/dictionary/500.html#433 "A son of Mine with regard for Perdition (’Avadówn) cares little for the education of Yâ-hwéh, but do not despond under the correction of His Son, oh Yisrâ’ë´l, because whom Yâ-hwéh loves, Yâ-hwéh educates, and Yâ-hwéh scourges everyone that has regard for the Son, whom He acknowledges as His own". - Proverbs מְ 3:11-12 מְשָׁלִ֥ים

Restored Ten Messages – a prediction about Yâhuwshúa`, which satan altered into commandments. THE TEN MESSAGES

Hidden Name Tutorial—These songs are crafted to teach our absent brothers, who are not yet among us, how to pronounce His names. While mainstream media opens portals that invite darkness, these melodies safeguard the listener. Embrace the rhythmic serenity and let the sound reveal deeper understanding. HIDDEN NAME TUTORIAL — SONGS OF LIGHT A guided way to hear, learn, and practice the hidden Name: Yâhuwshúa` These songs are crafted as a Hidden Name Tutorial —musical pieces in multiple styles that help you recognize, pronounce, and remember Yâhuwshúa`. They are not meant to replace your everyday music. Several versions of one song are designed to send a message to brother(s) not yet among us. What These Songs Are (and Aren’t) Being centered on Yâhuwshúa`'s name, His Love, and His Light, these lyrics return—again and again—to Yâhuwshúa`'s Goodness, and our true Home: the dimension of Light. They are not “worldly” in focus, putting very little attention on the present world where we’re stationed here for a while, awaiting His full completion. These are a medium for a pleasant learning practice that can be engaged in frequently. Through Him, the music becomes more than mere sound—it becomes a Way of learning, practicing, and remembering. In a sense, the channel’s signature is Yâhuwshúa` — the hidden Name; therefore, His Love, and Light is regularly featured in our songs. Why the Styles Vary The genres here are intentional, not random. They arise from two places: 1. Listener resonance (analytics): what helps people engage and retain the pronunciation. 2. Gentle guidance in Wisdom through Yâ-hwéh Yâhuwshúa`: the Love-infused direction that shapes the path of this channel, driven from personal experience. You’ll encounter relaxed chill/lo-fi, smooth R&B with progressive pop , energetic synth/Euro-pop , and the grooves of funk/neo-funk —with more to come. There are thousands of musical genres; as I keep learning how to use Yâhuwshúa`’s Name in time and tone, I’ll continue adding new styles, but keep in mind that our YouTube channel’s genre is Yâhuwshúa` — the hidden Name. How to Use These Tutorials Pick a song or playlist that fits your current mood (chill, R&B-pop, synth/euro, funk, etc.). Listen and repeat the Name Yâhuwshúa` as it appears—let the rhythm guide your pronunciation, as you wait for the name Yâhuwshúa` to appear again in the song. Revisit regularly. Short, frequent sessions help His name stay on your lips and in your memory. Share with a friend who’s ready to learn and practice alongside you. Switch the type of songs to vary and expand your horizons. Playlists (Growing Library) Chill & Lo-Fi Practice — gentle textures for quiet repetition. R&B + Progressive Pop — smooth phrasing with melodic emphasis. Synth & Euro Pop — energetic articulation and memorable hooks. Funk & Neo-Funk — rhythmic practice with groove and clarity. EDM & Dance — pulsing energy for practicing with intensity and rhythmic precision. Some playlists currently have only a few songs—this is just the beginning. They’ll grow into fuller journeys as new tracks are added. What You Can Expect Lyrics that lift the mind toward Yahuwshua’s Goodness and our Home in Light. Clear, recurring pronunciation moments for His name. Cinematic, peaceful visuals that don’t distract from the purpose. A space to pause, listen, and practice. This musical journey is guided by Yâ-hwéh Yâhuwshúa` and will continue until it reaches its appointed completion — 144 songs — symbolizing the 144,000 chosen Children of Yâhuwshúa`. Each song marks a step in that pure count and carries its part of the greater message to the whole number. Frequently Asked Are these meant to replace my regular music? No. They are for focused learning and remembrance—use them when you want to practice and center on Yâhuwshúa`. Why multiple genres? Different people/ears learn differently. Style diversity helps more people connect, retain, and pronounce His name clearly. How often do you add songs? Regularly. As guidance comes and as the channel grows, playlists will expand until they reach their purpose. Can I share these? Yes—please do. Share a link or a playlist with someone ready to hear and practice Yâhuwshúa`, or who seeks His help. Do you take song requests? No. These songs are not created by request or preference but by guidance through Yâ-hwéh Yâhuwshúa`. Each song comes when and how it is meant to, shaped by His timing and purpose. While we appreciate heartfelt ideas, this channel follows the path He sets before it — one song at a time. Why don’t your video lyrics include the accents or diacritics for Yâhuwshúa` as seen on this website? Because we want listeners to grow familiar with saying “Yahuwshua,” His only true name, by HEARING it, which happens to be Hebrew, rather than focusing on specifics on how it’s transliterated into English; this keeps the emphasis on the sound, rhythm, and recognition of His true Name—as spoken, not just by reading. Walk With Us Thank you for listening, sharing, and walking this path with us. There’s much more music to come—guided step by step by Yahweh Yahuwshua. → Explore the playlists below → Subscribe for new “Songs of Light” over at M.C: Songs of Light → Return often to practice the hidden Name: Yâhuwshúa` YÂHUWSHÚA`: THE HIDDEN NAME DUAL NAMES EXPLAINED – VIDEO TUTORIAL You can also learn how to pronounce His names (dual names) with our recording of The Saving Testimony. YÂ-HWÉH YÂHUWSHÚA The Saving Testimony 00:00 BACK TO TOP

We sharfe a code key to help you decode LXX coded scriptures for you to learn what's been hidden from you. A CODE KE Y TO DECODE LXX-CODED SCRIPTURES

In this document we put together the transcript of the video, The Timeline: "Donald Trump, Q and The Great Awakening ". Charlie Freak walks us through the timeline of President Trump's actions from 2017 to early 2019 RD with a convincing picture history of the events which he says proves every single government on earth has capitulated to Donald J Trump. We disclaim name substitutes for Yâ-hwéh Yâhuwshúa`. Click Document to Download English español Back to Who is Trump?

Properly translated references of "reincarnation" in Proverbs. recycling Αναστρέφω (Anastrepho) Strong’s # 390 “to turn hither and thither, to turn one’s self about, sojourn dwell in a place.”

Table of Biblical Historical & Prophetic Events from Creation to End 0-7000. Includes people's names per KJV for you to recognize. HISTORY OF MAN VERSION FOR THE KJV IMPAIRED

Our recommended videos exposing the works of darkness with our Sword, Who is Yahuwshua. GALLERY

According to inspired scriptures, there are three types of people in the world today. These are psychical, the spiritual and the earthly. CLASSIFYING THE COMPOSITION OF THE POPULATION: According to Codices According to several codices there are three types of population [one codex uses the word “phoenix” (winged-creature) instead of dirt-man] in this world (cosmos), until the end of the world [age/cosmos]. Their circumstances are compared to the three kinds of wing-creatures of pardeç "paradise"(as seen outside of time). The reason for the different descriptions is because during this age, dirt-men and winged-creatures are two of the 4 spiritual animals. Néphesh (“soul”) means insufflation and can be either from The One of Light, or from the one of the darkness. An insufflation from the Light is immortal but the one from the darkness is not. According to one treatise, the composition of the population of this world consists of (1) a body originating from darkness and fire ; (2) a néphesh (“soul”) brought forth through the defilement of the winds and the demons; (3) a particle of Mind (rescued by Spirit) and to whom our Savior granted a Light called ‘Trust’ (“pistis/faith”) and Thought produced by the ‘astonishment’ (EKSTASIS) of the Spirit (4). The Greek word EKSTASIS, from which comes "ecstasy", literally means being outside of one’s self, and is traditionally misinterpreted by scholars translating it as being crazy, astonished, out of sorts, “beside yourself”. But EKSTASIS describes The Mind’s literally transporting outside of one’s self, resulting in the Thought – the response given from the inquiry of the Mind to Yâ-hwéh Yâhuwshúa`, Who gives freely from the treasures of knowledge and Wisdom. So, 'Thought' is a result of the astonishment (EKSTASIS) of the Mind, to Yâ-hwéh Yâhuwshúa`. The combinations of these four constituents (1-4) defines three classes of population, even the hylic (material people), which we have termed “Type C”. These hylics (Type C), are ruled by the néphesh “soul” and belong to darkness – they have body and a néphesh from the darkness. But noetics (mental people), which we have termed “Type B”, who are ruled by the Mind and belong to Trust (“faith”) – they have a body, néphesh, and a mind; yet pneumatics (spiritual people), which we have termed “Type A”, are who are ruled by Thought and belong to Spirit – they have a body, soul, mind and thought). The sum of all of Type A and Type B compose the perfect finite number in the Mind of the Father, A-Z of one overcoming the demon (yisrâ’ë´l). Type A were procreated by the Son, and are known in restored LXX-decoded scriptures as yisrâ’ë´l above . Type B were procreated by Wisdom, currently being two daughters, one she procreated alone, B1, and the other she procreated with sâțâ´n, B2. The Son, Yâhuwshúa`, paid for adopting all of Type B, a broad category including all yisrâ’ë´l outside of Him: middle and underneath , per the descriptions of the vessels of yisrâ’ë´l found in LXX-decoded scriptures. But note that since Type C is not of the number of yisrâ’ë´l at all, they are not reckoned a vessel of yisrâ’ë´l and are hardly found mentioned in LXX-decoded scriptures, except the famous mention in Disclosure (Revelation) 20: 8 of the goats being rounded up to attack the last group of newly-existing ones, in coded speech as the ones not being the mountain (Ğowğ) and not from the mountain (Mâ-ğówğ). The Hebrew word yisrâ’ë´l means one overcoming the demon , those outside have not yet come to exist of yisrâ’ë´l. In terms of the Tree (cross) and the Fruit (Yâhuwshúa`), A regards the Fruit, B1 regards the Tree (cross), and B2 does not regard the Tree (cross). With regards to where one goes when one physically dies, Type A goes to the Light, but Type B goes to sh’ówl (the underworld). The chart below contains the information found in codices describing the characteristics found in each of these groups. It contains what we have noted after learning about these three types of characters in LXX decode d scriptures and the books of Baruch and our personal impressions with identifying their components accordingly with the codices and LXX decoded scriptures. We share the chart because inspired scriptures urge us to "know thy self,"; know how what composes each one, know from where each component came, and identify which kind we are, thus to know where we go after physical death. The codices mention three types of population, but we have identified that a group of deeply lost ones (from B2) are currently mixed in with the Type C to be discarded. To summarize and to further explain the relation of this categorization to the LXX decoded canonical description of the vessels of yisrâ’ë´l: Type A, who is called yisrâ’ë´l in LXX-decoded canonical scriptures, has the Spirit, Mind, and a Néphesh from the Light, and a Material Body and its néphesh from the darkness. Type A is the offspring of Yâhuwshúa` alone. The Envoy functions as the Mind and provides His Spirit (gifted to the ones , not on loan). His Standing makes the uniqueness for type A to be called Spiritual: pneumatics . The dirt-body (with its fiery one) temporary tabernacle carries His néphesh (f.) inside. Type A loves the Most High, their Father. At the Sixth Seal, when everything returns from where it came, Type A drops one component in their composition made by sâțâ´n, the fiery one, which is the flesh’s néphesh (f.) . Type B, who is middle yisrâ’ë´l and yisrâ’ë´l underneath , has a Mind, Néphesh, and Material Body. They are conscious of there being something higher than them, which makes Type B called Mental ones: noetics. Type B is two daughters of Wisdom, so it has two subgroups, B1 and B2. Type B1 is the Middle "Day" offspring of Sophia alone; these love their Mother and do have regard for the tree/cross. Type B2 is the offspring of Sophia and sâțâ´n, so codices say they have a choice of which of these two to prefer and take after, although neither regards the tree/cross. In LXX-decoded canonical scriptures, Middle "Night" yisrâ’ë´l are B2s are not being the darkness, but the sâțâ´nist widow yisrâ’ë´l underneath are B2s currently loving their father sâțâ´n, and striving to emulate their father sâțâ´n by doing away with their B2 Mind (conscience) as much as possible. Type C is not, nor will ever be, any of the finite perfect numbers of yisrâ’ë´l, but they are mentioned in codices and described when pertinent in restored canonical scriptures. The Type C group is merely composed of Material body and Néphesh. They have no conscience of anything but material so they are called Material: hylic. Type C goats are expendable stressors, according to codices, designed for destruction, and also noted in MattithYâ´huw 25:32-33. Type C are the goats, and since the adversary has no regard for the finite perfect number, Type C outnumbers the finite perfect number, meaning it composes over half the earth's population. Moreover, Type C rulers populate the top echelons of the pyramid of the order of this cosmos, which is upside down to make sâțâ´n, the lowest of all, literally the capstone oppressing everyone below him. The terms “above, middle, and underneath” refer to positions in the cosmos of Light, not this one of the darkness. Currently, those ruling authorities of this world are mixed with the B2 sâțâ´nist widow Underneath because they are competing for the adversary's favor. They are those “not being the mountain nor from the mountain” who will be led by the least favored Middle-night B2 ones, who will have been misled by B2 underneath by their “false prophets” when their Great Anger is released after one thousand years of recycling, and these will lead these Type C goats to surround those newly-existing widow B2 underneath, who by then will have come to reject their current father and accept Yâ-hwéh Yâhuwshúa`, and the Middle-night B2 ones will burn these ones with the fire of yisrâ’ë´l. : “Him against the material universe (All the ones entering into the cosmos (material universe), resembling a drop originating from the Light, are sent out/forth among My yisrâ’ë´ l of Sabaoth, “of the hosts” (a demon) in order that the same ones of the Son may be guarded/protected within Him (the Same One)”