Cancel Call Forwarding: The near-miss false name entries
A record of linguistic misdirections, substitutions, and intercepted praise.
The information presented here is censored by the establishment. To understand the problem of calling on false names to invoke the Most High, one must first see the broader context of our situation. We are dealing with a precise linguistic interception—a spiritual hostage crisis.
Before navigating the entries below, we break down the mechanics of this deception through six vital dimensions: Who, Where, What, How, Why, and Which.
Who & Where: The Impostor and the Hostage Dungeon
The adversary was misconceived as a competing, inferior, temporary supernatural being—confined to the darkness like a bratty child in a sandbox where it could do no permanent damage. But when this entity discovered its reality—that it was limited, confined, and utterly unacknowledged by the true, real Most High (Who didn’t even grant it a name)—its extreme, undue pride was deeply offended.
Victimizing itself, it made an illegitimate legal claim on the hostages it took from its trapped Mother. Filled with sudden, intense envy and hatred for the Most High, its Mother, and all her progeny, it realized a terrifying truth: the hostages were destined to be returned to the Most High, while it, its sandbox, and the darkness itself would be entirely undone.
In a desperate bid to keep ALL the hostages it got out of its trapped Mother—not just those it fathered from Her—the adversary constructed an imitation cosmos in the darkness. This entire cosmos is a simulated hostage-dungeon designed to mimic the true realm of Light, expressly built to make the hostages believe they are home and that nothing is missing. Within this fake world he made, the adversary has positioned itself in the place of the Most High.
The Problem for satan: The Light is neither hidden nor hindered by the darkness. Anyone can call on and invoke the Most High from anywhere within this realm. To prevent these distress calls from being heard, the hostage-taker systematically changed the names the hostages use, deviating and altering true teachings to point toward itself, fabricating religions, and inhabiting material effigies with its own demons.
Why: The Identity Theft & The Energy Economy
Why does the adversary do this? The self-pity of a bratty child mutated into a deliberate mission to steal the identity of the Most High—to supplant Him, fool the population into mistaking the counterfeit for their Creator, and create a massive web of confusion so hostages would never desire to return to Him/Home. Why does the adversary need hostages?
Because his realm of darkness is unbased, floating surrounded by Light it is outside of and cannot retain, strictly confined in a Way he cannot infiltrate nor ever enter, and it needs a balance of force, Star Wars style, to be stable and not self-destruct. It needs Light that the adversary has none of, and no way to obtain, except by holding hostages from the Light who receive charitable gifts of Light not unlike foreign money transfers being the source of funds for some poor countries. Therefore knowing his realm depends on input from the Light outside, satan would never voluntarily give up his hostages, it had to be a legally obtained determination, to be executed. Thereafter, with no Light input, the darkness and all its lightless content will implode to nothing, as also its misconception will be entirely undone timelessly.
Unless the hostage understands the need for freedom, escape, and assistance for this hostage situation, he will believe the lies of the impostor hostage-taker, and may be deceived to believe that it does not matter what name one uses to invoke the Most High, and he will continue believe more lies stating that He is invoked by terms which he doesn’t even know apply to the envious impostor. A good passage to persuade such a deluded person would be to have them read Psalms 44: 20-22 in their KJV, which is clear even ‘as-is’. Still, it is much more profound when restored.
That’s why we here will supply the censored information that impostor keeps away from the hostages, the fact that those religious terms provided by the establishment apply to the envious impostor bratty child identity thief, and actually call on that other one, and will serve to call on it when the people will organize to attempt to do distress calls to the Most High soon, in these end-times.
What: The Christian Matrix & The Anatomy of Denial
Christianity worships a Savior Who came in the flesh, Whose physical body was crucified for their errors, and Who rose again and lives forever. They believe He is the Most High in Person, that salvation is attached to believing on His name, and that He will resurrect them. All of these teachings are true.
Yet, while Christianity generally believes they know how to call on the One they worship, they do not. The deceived do not believe they are deceived; they continue being deceived and deceiving others. When confronted with this, the more perseverant individuals rationalize and dismiss their failed attempts to reach Him, unable to accept that they have set up a spiritual “call diversion” system that directs their prayers straight to satan.
This inability to change one's mind is not a matter of organic IQ; it happens across the entire intelligence spectrum. Certainly pride halts learning, but that is not the reason every time they cannot change their mind. It is ultimately a spiritual thing which is due to different spiritual compositions among the population (see our classification page). Even Mark Twain (who was a deceiver freemason satanist), is quoted as saying “It’s easier to fool people than it is to convince them that they’ve been fooled”.
So most Christians cannot accept being told they do not know His true names and the terms they call Him are false, and that means they’ve been fooled to have call-forwarding set up to forward their calls to satan.
Lately, non-satanists are slowly awakening to the many ways they’ve been fooled by the satanists who rule this world. They call it “the Great Awakening”—a famous phrase likely coined by the satanists themselves as a voluntary recruitment trap to transfer people directly into satanism.
But this particular deprivation of Truth carries potentially catastrophic consequences they have not even considered, including the possibility of losing their salvation, according to their memory that salvation and forgiveness of sins is attached to believing on His name. And the separation apart from their Savior is something they would be very angry about, if they do not know how this is completely accounted for in the plan of the Most High their Savior.
Thus, fear causes the denial and anger which characterize their first reactions to being informed of this fact, which, more than other truth revelations, should be done gently, because it is definitely the biggest deception satan has perpetrated on non-satanists. The next thing that happens, according to the known pattern, is bargaining, before those few capable of believing in His Truth show the grief of repentance. Nonetheless anyone sharing this information should be considerate and apply affectionate Love whenever probing whether someone is capacitated to believe in His Truth.
The main (and most understandable) strenuous objection that Christians have against this is to claim that the Most High could not possibly desire such a situation to exist, and as such, to suggest that this is so is to accuse the Most High of being too weak to prevent it.
But the Most High truly is NOT who willed this situation to exist, He did NOT approve of it, He was not even who caused it to happen. It was a result of the granted freedom of One of His emanations (Wisdom) Who accidentally misused it irresponsibly, but He is Who anticipated it happening, having complete foresight, and He covered everything beforehand to be fully resolved in His plan, which is absolutely on schedule and, regarding this, truly “nothing can stop what’s coming”, and the perfection of His perfect finite number will be fulfilled at the end of the 7000 years that He permits the darkness to continue. As Christians already know, He does not destroy all the darkness just yet so as to not destroy the last ones who are to come out of it.
So, indeed, the Most High has never been too weak to stop it, He Self-Generated His Personhood to be capable of separating from His Own Greatness in His foresight to His necessary Work, and He also mourned its happening beforehand with 144,000 tears, so He has taken care of it already, having set in motion all the elements for the total solution of it.
But the Christian hostages haven’t even noticed the Matrix resulting from the error – this entire hostage dungeon imitation cosmos in the realm of darkness; that it is not where the Most High intended us to be, nor where He will permit us to stay forever. He is not planning to FIX this place and make us stay away from Him separated apart in this emboxed darkness. No, He wants us fully developed and completed to be enabled to be together with Him in the unlimited limitless Light.
And the separation apart from Him must be undone first in order to capacitate ones seeking Him to find Him to be the Witness within, to retain His true names to acknowledge Him when He calls. This is the Anastasis, the Standing in the middle. But in the meantime, we explain here all the various substitutes for Him we have encountered, which refer whoever calls on them to the adversary, what we term as “call-forwarding”.
To understand the problem about calling on false names to try to call on the Most High, one needs to see the context of the issue.
How: The Mechanism of Interception
The sources of the false names are generally two:
-
The various satanists’ nicknames for who they worship, in the languages wherein they infiltrated and misled their Christian congregations, so they can continue to call on who they worship, and still enjoy the trust of Christians who never heard anything differently, or
-
The source can be different religions’ nicknames for demons they worship. When they were converted by Christian missionaries, they were most easily joined when they were told they did not need to change names, the name they used was fine.
How the interception operates is mechanical: the establishment provides false terms and titles (none of which qualify as an actual "name," save for Yâ-hwéh) that act as a rerouting switch. The moment these terms are uttered, your calls intended for our Father of the Lights are immediately forwarded to the father of lies.
Which: The Rerouted Terms
Below is the record of the specific substitutes, false names, and titles we have encountered throughout this realm. These are the terms given by the establishment that actually invoke and call upon the envious impostor bratty child—and will unfortunately serve to call upon it when people attempt to make distress calls to the Most High in these end-times.
(Note: Except for Yâ-hwéh, these terms trigger the call-forwarding mechanism).
This name, known mostly from being the name of the biological brother of Moshéh, means “I conceived the impregnation”. It appears to be a first-person participle verb form of Strong’s H02032 hërówn which means “conception, pregnancy, physical conception”, which comes from the verb H02029 hârâ´h, which means “to conceive, become pregnant”, although the establishment lexicons deny knowing of its origin, “of uncertain derivation”. They allege it to mean “light bringer” which is the translation of Latin “lucifer”. But satan has no Light since blowing It off in anger (nostrils in Hebrew) into the dirt-image, so Lucifer being is a lie.
It is not the same as what the Personhood of the Most High is, the Self-generated One (see the Secret Book of John). It appears that ’aharówn relates to a pregnancy, knowing that the adversary was the misconceived spawn of shame of Wisdom. Apparently, the adversary started a lie to allege he is who conceived his own misconception, because reading the various accounts will illustrate this. So, analyze how “Aaron” can deceive: it means the adversary is claiming credit for the creation of the matrix. No, Wisdom made Her own mistake and will undo it. One can believe the conception refers to that of the daughters of Wisdom, but those npheshóth (“souls”), through Wisdom are of the Most High. The conception was of the idea of the matrix to mature the Seedlings, but what was misbegotten was the mistake being satan, so he is perhaps comparable to a placenta: it gets thrown away after the desired product of the conception is rescued out of the matrix.
But when realizing that ’aharówn refers to the adversary and NOT the Self-generated Personhood of the Most High, one can understand why this term is found hidden in code, much more often than the brother of Moshéh is mentioned, wherever theos (demonic-power) appears in the Septuagint LXX. Usually the establishment substitutes “God“ as a “translation” for theos, although according to the code, it should be restored as “the demonic-power of I conceived the impregnation” (satan).
Consider, moreover, that the tribe of “Levi” (Lëwíy) which means “joined”, has a priesthood of the order of the ‘sons of ’aharówn (satan)’ which did animal material sacrifices (to appease satanic law) in a material temporary dwelling (tabernacle) and later a permanent material house (temple), all of which are disowned by the living Savior. To understand this shocking information, one must comprehend that the entire setup of the Levitical Aaronic priesthood and Israel being a biological tribe “overcoming God”, and even who they serve who alleged being self-conceived, was all a very bad satanic imitation of the real priesthood of the order of the royals of the correctness (malkëy-tsedeq) to the High Priest Yâhuwshúa`, the King of Correctness (mis-rendered “righteousness”) Who causes His ones to come to exist of One overcoming the demonic-power (yisrâ’ë´l), which does not have anything to do with biology or pregnancies or material sacrifices or stone buildings. These poor token representations in this material world made for satanists to serve satan are just shadowy representations of eternal realities about the organized arrangement (cosmos) of the Light.
The satanists know well these facts, using this term to apply to the adversary they worship, knowing Christians will think it is just ‘Old Covenant’ which was from the same one.
A term in Hebrew meaning “father of the sovereign“ used by satanists to refer to the adversary’s power as relating to his incarnated manifestation being the impostor sovereign. Its intent is to confuse the reader to think this adversary is the “Father“ of “the Son” Who is the Most High and His Personhood. It is materially seen as the greater luminary orb “sun”, which he adopted as his own star-power, although it is actually a countdown time-measuring system counting down the time left allotted to the darkness to remain. The KJV sometimes translates this as “perdition”, as in the ‘son of perdition’ being the impostor sovereign. The Jews openly referred to who they worship as this in Matt. 12: 24 decoded. Please see the more detailed entry “father of the sovereign“
The Aramaic rendering of Hebrew ’av, “father”. It is nonspecific, thus insufficient to positively identify who the “father” is. “My father” would be ’avíy but different groups have different fathers (See the Composition of the Population page), as our Savior said in John 8: 44 about those whose father is the adversary.
A term in Hebrew meaning “my sovereigns (plural)”. As it is plural, it would refer to demons. Those using this term as a name-substitute often illogically allege the plurality to be ‘out of respect’. The term for a single sovereign is ’adówn, Strong’s H0113 but being nonspecific, is insufficient to positively identify who the sovereign is.
Although allegedly in Arabic, when looking in Hebrew, this term can be spelled two ways: עָלָ֖ה `Âlâ´h (Strong’s H5927), which means “he ascended”, or אָלָ֖ה ’Âlâ´h (Strong’s H423), which means “Curse”. The Most High did not originate low to ascend, and He is by no means a curse. Yet in Islam, this term is alleged to refer to the Most High, but in reality, only refers to the adversary, although he never has entered into the Light by ascending nor otherwise.
In LXX this is Strong’s G3841 pantokrator, which means “upholder of all”, looking at its etymology relating to G2902 kratéw to hold fast and keep carefully and faithfully, not discard. The definitions easiest to find portray the adversary instead, who seizes everyone to get power over them. Most of the instances of “almighty” in the “Old Testament” are simply the demonic-power of aaron (’ël-’aharówn) with the Masoretic “shaddâ´y“ apparently inserted sometime after the LXX was translated. And in some places, the Masoretic “shaddâ´y“ is used to substitute out the true names whose standard replacement terms are found in the LXX. So the KJV which picked the more altered Masoretic for its “Old Testament” is notorious that most of these “Almighties” are not found in any form at all in the original. But the “upholder of all” description of our Savior, the Most High, certainly appears the exact opposite of the adversary being the “capstone” oppressing everyone below him and being held up by everyone beneath.
This term is expanded in the gnostic glossary of this site here. Ariel is a term in Hebrew meaning “the lion of the demonic-power” (’ariy’ë´l) which is found in Yshá`Yâhuw 29, as being part of the spiritual City, though not yet. Note that the ‘four living creatures’ are their spiritual species of yisrâ’ë´l, the first of which is like a lion, and the last of which is winged-creatures “eagle-like”. The last are the highest so the first is the lowest, therefore the lions resemble their father sâţâ´n, being lion-like. The description of the spawn of shame (satan) as seen by Wisdom before her throwing him into the fog was that he looked like a cross between a lion and a snake. These lions thus are the widow yisrâ’ë´l underneath. Take note that satanic institutions like Disney love to name characters by this name. But some may ask, why is this term included? The adversary proudly promotes his spiritual appearance as a lion (or a snake), and distorted one verse in his King Supplanter Version to falsely allege that the LION overcame the Lamb, and base several of religious groups he misled, to worship an image of a lion to be the King, to be the Lamb somehow. They substitute out our Savior for this “Lion of Judah“, of which Judah is a version of the name of Judas, the “Yehuwthâ´h” name satan invented as the name which would open the eyes of Adam, the “forbidden fruit”. Disney the freemason’s satanist institution also made a “Lion King” movie to help this lie, and gave another of its characters the name Ariel.
Is a transliteration of a Greek term meaning ‘anointed one’. In establishment scriptures, the satanists do not know the cascade effect of the salvific work, involving all the ones in His perfect number to become one causing to be existed (come to exist). Warning: It sounds outlandish to those unfamiliar with restored or higher knowledge scriptures: He, the Most High Yahweh, makes three Yahwehs (ones causing to be existed) out of three dirt-men (groups). He caused to exist His 144,000 children first, who are the First ’Âthâ´m. And those are the anointed ones who cause to exist the Many of the nonsatanist middle yisrâ’ë´l, who become the Second ’Âthâ´m. Thereafter those cause to exist the last relatively smaller group which will be the Third ’Âthâ´m.
All this has been covered up by the adversary within the canon satan approved for public consumption, by censorship methods also kept covered up from public knowledge, though Christianity’s opponents exploit the resulting confusion and bad translations and contradictions, forcing them to defend altered scriptures.
What about its relation to Christians?
Acts 11: 26 documents in ’Antióxeia, is when the pupils were first called “Xristianous” (Christians), which is a Greek word which is the closest to translating the meaning of anointed ones. And in verse 30 it mentions pure ones and brothers were there. Knowing these pupils refer to the purified and paired 144,000, the same crowds who had followed our Savior around and were the sons He brought to exist being redeemed by Him after His resurrection, we can see that the 144,000 are still ‘the anointed ones’, and are who were first called “Christians” (anointed ones) being the “primitive church”. Moreover, these 144,000 return during these end-times and are still the anointed ones after the 62 weeks mentioned in Daniel 9: 27-28: a fact currently hidden from Christianity. Is our Savior One anointed too? He is the anointing.
He is Who causes and initiates the cascade of everyone becoming one causing to be existed into His freedom/wealth. Definitely, the end of the pruning of those who did not make the 62-week deadline comes from the anointed ones, who cause the Standing in the middle, the end of their death, spiritual and physical.
Is a term in Hebrew meaning possessor (like a demon), owner, controller, despot, but the perfect English translation of it is “lord“. Bá`al was not translated to English in the satanist establishment’s bibles since they chose to use the title “LORD“ to substitute out all instances of the name Yâ-hwéh, to in effect have all Christians calling on bá`al in English. Had they translated “baal” to “lord”, Christians would have rejected it and sought the name of Who they want to worship. How can a Christian begin to want to reject calling on ha-bá`al (“the LORD“)? First inform them that their Savior is the KING, and a King is a Sovereign, much higher rank than a mere lord. Look at the “house of lords” in the UK government for example. Do they outrank their “king”? No. There is another confusing factor the KJV did: they mistranslated “Adonay“ also as “Lord“ without all caps, knowing it means “sovereign” not “Lord”. Because of these two terms replacing nearly all the instances of the name Yâ-hwéh, with the same term, many people lose sight of “’adówn” not having the same meaning as bá`al.
Yet there still are some stubborn proclaimers of bá`al who searched their scriptures to excuse their continuing to call the Most High a lord even after being told it is a mistake. They often cite these two references in KJV “Old Testament” scripture, which were translated from the Masoretic Text, to allege that Yâ-hwéh Yâhuwshúa` approves of such a title for Himself, but they are translation MISTAKES:
In Yshá`Yâhuw ("Isaiah") 54:5, there where the Masoretic Text has bo`aláyikh (one-being-lord-of-you) written, the Septuagint (LXX) has kurios, which is a translation for ’Athon therefore it should be translated "Sovereign", because we consider the Septuagint (LXX) to reflect an earlier less altered scripture (Moreover we know from coding that kurios substitutes out the dual-names Yâ-hwéh Yâhuwshúa`).
In YirmYâhuw 31:32 ("Jeremiah"), there is a one letter error in the Masoretic, B-`-L-T-Y is actually B-Ch-L-T-Y and it means "I loathed". Ivriym ("Hebrews") 8:9 and the Septuagint (LXX) and the Peshitta Aramaic Tenákh demonstrate that the Masoretic text has this one-letter mistake here. The `Ivríyth (Hebrew) here was originally Bâchaltíy and not Bâ`áltiy.
This term, found often in noncanonical inspired scriptures and also included in the gnostic glossary here, and most notably in the Gospel of Judas, is very simply the Aramaic translation of the Greek term “Tetragrammaton“, which means “four-letter word” in English. Isn’t it peculiar that the adversary made “four-letter words” equivalent to “profanity” in English? Before the 17th century, Hebrew was written without vowels, because its rules were known to its speakers, but as it was dying, vowels were added. In the Gospel of Judas, Yehuwdah, who was satan incarnate, told our Savior he knew Who He was, saying that He was from “Barbelo”, refusing to speak His names, being incapable of it. “Four-letter word” is not His name. And keeping it in Greek or Aramaic only mystifies it, the adversary shall never invoke Him nor acknowledge Him. Why is Barbelo found at all anywhere else in ‘gnostic scriptures’? Because the Sanhedrin satanist council determined to censor all teaching and writing of the name of Yâ-hwéh Yâhuwshúa` among mankind, and that was reinforced by the satanist rulers of the Romans after the Bar-Kochba revolt, banning the use of the name under penalty of death. So name substitutes like “Barbelo” got written into the copies to substitute the outlawed censored names, by order of satan through his slaves the satanists, though satan-Judas (Yehuwthâ´h) actually said “Barbelo” in keeping with his censorship of the Most High he envies.
This term is codex terminology and can be found here. As with other terms, assess this term etymologically, to understand it better. Demiurge comes from demos, people, and ergo, work as ourgos, worker. The worker of the people works to refine the undeveloped seedlings into developed beings who prefer good and not evil. And seeing it specified in the Tripartite Tractate that the demiurge is used to form people, and is itself also called many of the same terms usable on the Most High, it is apparent that this is the adversary. To understand this, one must be familiar with how Wisdom misconceived the adversary, what Her thought process was, for the good intent of the purpose of developing the future seedlings which are undeveloped, by means of experiencing good and evil. But some err, and by confusing the people-molder who is the punisher as being the Most High, those erring arrive at the wrong conclusions about noncanonical scriptures to think they are satanist.
The English word “demon” comes from terms in Greek, daimon and daimonion, which are terms that come from daio meaning “fortune-distributor“, Strong’s G1142 says.
1142. δαίμων daimōn, dah'-ee-mown; from δαίω daio (to distribute fortunes); a dæmon or supernatural spirit (of a bad nature):--devil.
1142. δαίμων daímon; de δαίω daío (distribuir fortunas); demonio o espíritu sobrenatural (de naturaleza mala):—demonio.
Ancient Greeks called the spiritual progeny of the adversary which they worshipped by these terms, as they used them to obtain their material fortunes in exchange. When Christians came later, they redefined “demon” to its current meaning. But opposing satanists infiltrating Christianity from its earliest days introduced the Hebrew translation of demon (H1408/H1409) as a substitute term, “God“, to use to refer to the Most High. And other examples of demon being made a good thing is “deity” which is demon Latinized, Mammon in Aramaic, and Providence in English. Referring to Yâ-hwéh Yâhuwshúa` as a fortune-distributor in ANY language is a mistake, resulting in call-forwarding.
The Greek term Diós (Διός) is a specific name of Zeus, the principal demon of the Greeks, which by definition is the adversary. The adversary uses many names, and Zeus is historically a big one, which has many names too: “Diós” is only one of those names of Zeus and is found in Acts 14: 13 (see below) in all Greek “New Testament” translations. Here is a picture of an English-Greek interlinear bible copy of this verse:
Why do we mention that Diós is a name of Zeus, not directly a name of the adversary? Because the establishment hiding this from all the Spanish-speaking world writes it as Strong’s G2203, Zeus. Yet somehow, it forgets to write Diós into its Strong’s lexicon entry for Zeus:
Here is a pasted copy of Acts 14: 13 verse in the Byzantine Majority Text, with Strong’s parsing, with dios in bold font.:
13 ο <3588> δε <1161> ιερευς <2409> του <3588> διος <2203> του <3588> οντος <1510> (5752) προ <4253> της <3588> πολεως <4172> αυτων <846> ταυρους <5022> και <2532> στεμματα <4725> επι <1909> τους <3588> πυλωνας <4440> ενεγκας <5342> (5660) συν <4862> τοις <3588> οχλοις <3793> ηθελεν <2309> (5707) θυειν <2380> (5721)
Diós is one of the various names recognized as belonging specifically to Zeus, including Día, Diu (Div), and Dis. Those other names ARE found in the G2203 Greek Dictionary entry for Zeus, but Diós is only found in the Strong’s Concordance HIDDEN under diorusso G1358, which means “to penetrate”.
“Dios” is falsely being taught as a valid title for Yâ-hwéh, when it is actually a term for the adversary, aka Zeus, and this switch is replacing Him with satan for Spanish-speaking Christians, supposedly as if it were a “translation”. In fact, when Dios does legitimately occur in the Greek NT in the Spanish Reina-Valera 1909 translation of Acts 14: 13, shown here, the term “Diós” is replaced by “Júpiter”, and in the Reina-Valera 1989 translation, “Diós” is replaced by “Zeus”, because THERE, Spanish readers would recognize Dios to be the adversary, Zeus.
12 (RVA89) A Bernabé le llamaban Zeus y a Pablo, Hermes, porque era el que llevaba la palabra.
12 (IGNT) εκαλουν τε τον μεν {and they called} βαρναβαν {Barnabas} δια τον {ZEUS; } δε {and} παυλον {Paul} ερμην {Hermes,} επειδη {because} αυτος {he} ην {was} ο {the} ηγουμενος του {leader} λογου {in speaking.}
13 (RVA89) Entonces el sacerdote del templo de Zeus, que quedaba a la entrada de la ciudad, llevó toros y guirnaldas delante de las puertas de la ciudad, y juntamente con el pueblo quería ofrecerles sacrificios.
13 (IGNT) ο {and} δε {the} ιερευς του {priest} διος {OF ZEUS } του {who} οντος {was} προ της {before} πολεως {city,} αυτων {their} ταυρους {oxen} και {and} στεμματα {garlands} επι {to} τους {the} πυλωνας {gates} ενεγκας {having brought,} συν {with} τοις {the} οχλοις {crowds} ηθελεν {wished} θυειν {to sacrifice.}
This intentional cover-up of the material proof of their FRAUD worsens even more due to the deceitfulness of the authors of the Strong’s concordance, because there any truth-seeking Spanish speaker will find that this word “Jupiter” is linked to #2203 Zeus, but nowhere under this entry in the Strong’s dictionary will you find Diós, this other name of Zeus which is written there in that verse.
This is a Kabbalah Jewish substitute term they desire to seem to refer to the Most High yet it does not, by their Jewish mysticism, which means mistaken overthinking while uninformed by inspired scriptures we accept which they reject. Do not mistake “Ein” with the German number one, this is a Hebrew term ’ëyn which means “there is no…” or often rendered “without”. And Sof is the Hebrew term çowph, Strong’s H05490 meaning “end” or “conclusion” or cessation, related to its verb H05486. It is apparently also related to H0657 ’épheç, which means ceasing, end, finality, cessation (especially of the earth in this realm of darkness).
Putting ’ëyn çowph together literally means ‘there is no cessation’. But they turn it into ‘unconcluded’ which is different, so it is more about the adversary who DOES have an end but has not yet ceased, but shows for whom it is they likely have hopes to not cease as planned. So they express it to the public as meaning “eternal”, but there certainly is no lack of better terms for that in Hebrew.
Why their confusing explanation? The Jews spin-doctored this ’ëyn çowph which is about the adversary they worship, to pretend to apply it to the Most High they reject, by alleging it to apply to The One BEFORE He Self-Generated His Personhood Which He Himself named Yâ-hwéh Yâhuwshúa`, because no one else had the authority to rename Him nor ever will. And by this moment they specify being before He named Himself, thinking to give Him a name, though being indescribable, uncontainable, and undefinable by language, at that point, though thinking, The One had not started putting into effect His defining Himself or His describing Himself with a name. And they should not seek to redefine the Most High after that point because He had already named Himself. So “unconcluded” is hardly a correct term for “unstarted”. Thus, we conclude their alibi to be false, ’ëyn çowph is the expression of their vain hope for the adversary they worship to never end: “there is no cessation”. A false hope unshared by all nonsatanists, indeed.
And this Ein Sof being found mentioned in their tradition of Davening, now becoming more well-known to the nonsatanist Christians, describes the adversary only. The pelvic thrusting motions done by the satanist-jews at the wailing wall of the Roman Fort Antonia fortress is called Davening, wherein satanists emulate the Ein Sof (adversary) having sexual intercourse with their spiritual Mother Wisdom Who is not consorting with them, Who long ago repented in tears from her fall (All the Psalms are the songs of Her repentance). She is Who they call the “Shekinah glory“, and Who in the past they also worshipped as the “Queen of Heaven“. She cannot be worshipped without Her being associated with and adhered to Yâ-hwéh Yâhuwshúa`. The second daughter of Wisdom was with the adversary, which compose who scripture calls night-middle yisrâ’ë´l, and yisrâ’ë´l underneath who are the satanist widow. This error is what their Davening is about, wanting to reunite, reconcile the repented Wisdom with their father satan, a profanity expressed sexually, even to enlarge their numbers. But Mother Wisdom has reconciled and reunited with the Most High Yâ-hwéh Yâhuwshúa`, Who has forgiven Her and restored Her to the point before having made the error. And though She is Who can undo Her error presently, having the ultimate authority over the entire matrix, She will only do so after She, the very last light to exit it, comes out. Then She will be reunited with Her Consort, as Wisdom is the Wife, and being re-Paired, She will be spiritually made Male again, as before Her separation from Him due to the error.
Therefore there is no Ein Sof well-wishing, the cessation definitely comes on time for the god of this world, whereas the Eternal One is the Most High Yâ-hwéh Yâhuwshúa`.
This term in Hebrew, ’ël, means demonic-power, exclusively demonic, never from the Light. It is explored and explained in our webpage ’Elohiym is wrong, ’Elohiym is not my Yahweh. The satanist-jews who were trusted by other satanists who employed themselves translating scriptures and making lexicons to define these Hebrew terms, did lie, as they do to their followers, alleging this ’ël to mean ALSO good powers from the Light, even Envoys, maligning them, and redefining terms like yisrâ’ë´l to their own propaganda’s benefit, increasing the confusion they create for satan’s identity theft. For instance, yisrâ’ë´l actually means “one overcoming the demonic-power” in the imperfect tense denoting something not yet completed. Everyone from the perfect number is one of yisrâ’ë´l, as all shall eventually overcome the demonic-power. But few have already done so by coming to exist within the Most High. But their redefining -’ë´l as being a good Envoy turned Ya`aqóv’s struggle against the impostor’s demonic force within him, which he overcame, to an absurd and profane account of the Supplanter physically wrestling against the Envoy of the Most High and overcoming Yâ-hwéh Yâhuwshúa` and forcing Him to bless him and calling him “yisrâ’ë´l”, leading readers to think that Ya`aqóv, which means Supplanter (a term also referring to the impostor adversary), defeated the Most High in wrestling, and that “yisrâ’ë´l” must mean “one overcoming the Most High”, the hope of the most delirious satanists. Not so.
As it appears in the Masoretic text, it gets translated into English as “the most high God”. We have exposed here, and on the webpage ’Elohiym is wrong, ’Elohiym is not my Yahweh, that El is a term exclusively for a demonic power, never one from the Light. Elyon `elyówn, (upsistos in Greek) denotes a superlative, “Most High”. Therefore, how can a demonic power be the “most high”? There can be only One Most High, our Father, not anything from the adversary.
Therefore, to figure out what scriptures originally said requires investigating in better sources than the Masoretic text, first in the Septuagint whose translation reflects an earlier more intact copy of scriptures. And the results of investigating mentions of “El Elyon” in the Masoretic and all the rest which contain both of these words show a common pattern:
The term “El” and “Elyon” are contrasted, and have several omitted words in between separating them, including negations (“not”), which make clear they are two opposing parties. Here are the first three mentions of “El Elyon” found in Masoretic Text scriptures, Genesis 14: 18, 19, and 20, in snippets, restored from LXX, with the words found translated in KJV in bold font. For the full context see the FPS translation:
Genesis 14: 18 (restored) – …|the ones (m.) [~middle transitional brothers] not originating from out |of the demonic-power of ’aharón (light-capturer/lucifer) against originating, |not [being] the ones (m.) [~144K] originating from out |of the Most High,…
Genesis 14: 19 (restored) – … |but not of the ones (m.) [~middle transitional brothers] |pertaining to the demonic-power of ’aharón (light-capturer/lucifer).
Moreover, over |but not of the ones (m.) [~middle transitional brothers], |moreover, [are] the same one(s) [~144K] pertaining to the Most High, |…
Genesis 14: 20 (restored) – …|he [~144K] who [is] not of the ones (n.) [~unpaired widow] with regard for |the demonic-power of ’aharón (light-capturer/lucifer) over of the ones (n.) [~unpaired], |[is] not he who of the ones (n.) [~unpaired middle] with regard for |the Most High. …
Why would the satanist establishment have altered scriptures in order to put together “the demonic-power of ’aharówn“ and “the Most High”? To make it appear that the adversary is the Most High, because “most high God” is a satanist lie and in keeping with their work to transfer them into satanism. The standard satanist strategy to how to try to convert nonsatanists is to gradually deceive and swindle and render them ineffective by depriving them of truth, because nonsatanists will reject the adversary whenever they finally realize it is the adversary. Yâhuwshúa` said they are trustworthy for it.
This term in Hebrew, ’Elohíym, is the plural form of ’ël, so it means demonic-powers, plural, exclusively demonic, never from the Light. It is explored and explained in our webpage ’Elohiym is wrong, ’Elohiym is not my Yahweh. The satanist-jews who were trusted by other satanists who employed themselves translating scriptures and making lexicons to define these Hebrew terms, did lie, as they do to their followers, alleging this to be ALSO good powers from the Light, even Envoys, but most commonly alleging this plural noun meaning demonic-powers to be a title for the Most High, as if The One were demonic or several (more than two because there are dual-noun forms). They respond to queries about why it is plural, stating that it is “out of respect” that they traditionally speak about Him in a plural sense (see also Adonay).
In their Masoretic text, in Bereshith (Genesis) 1: 26, Elohim is prominently displayed as being “us” (plural) who made the dirt-man in their (plural) own image. Those satanist-jews worshipping Elohim (demons) were the same who hid the extracanonical scriptures account of the same event, because the same ’elohíym are satan and 365 demons forming the dirt-image that became the first man in the image satan had seen reflected in the water (Secret book of Yâhuwchânâ´n). And this is confirmed when restoring the canonical scripture:
When their KJV Genesis 1: 26 account says:
26 ¶ (AV) And God said, Let us make man in our image, … and…
There, 1 Moshéh 1: 26, restoring the content only among those words (in bold), says this:
26 (FPS) …of one overcoming the demon (yisrâ’ë´l) being the one (f.) [~principality (f.)], then concerning the ones (f.) [~daughters of Wisdom] of Me, Yâ-hwéh the King, said he who is not for the advantage of the ones (n.) [~unpaired], the demonic-power of ’aharówn against of the ones (n.) [~unpaired],
“Let us [~sâţâ´n and 365 demons] make the ones (f.) [~daughters of Wisdom] being the ones (n.) [~unpaired] continuing to be the ones (n.) [~unpaired], the Union [~true yisrâ’ë´l] of The One (m.), become this other one [~Yehuwthâ´h/sâţâ´n] against the dirt man (’âthâ´m), 40 [~the number of the vanity] of the separation apart, according to the vessel of one overcoming the demon (yisrâ’ë´l) being the ones (n.) [~unpaired], being the image concerning the same one(s) being the ones (n.) [~unpaired] being ours, of one overcoming the demon (yisrâ’ë´l) being the one (f.) [~principality (f.)] [~their depiction of Yâhuwshúa`’s reflection in His 144,000 when water (mobile) (Secret book of Yâhuwchânâ´n)], and…
This term combination, famous in the past due to a song (sung by Amy Grant in 1982) written about it promoted by the satanist establishment as a “name” to apply to the Most High, is translated to English in the KJV 11 times as “God Almighty”, 5 times in the Old Testament, and 6 times in the book of Revelation. And ’ël shaddâ´y appears exclusively in the Masoretic Text, which was used by the KJV as its source for the OT. It does not appear in any form in the Greek Septuagint LXX translation; therefore, it does not appear to ever be present at all in ancient Hebrew scriptures, and was added therein after the time of the Septuagint LXX translation. It is an illegitimate insert.
The word shaddâ´y probably means ‘burly’, ‘muscular’, if it would derive from H07699, or it would mean “my demons” if it were related to H07700 shëd though the Strong’s Concordance believes it to relate to H07703 shâdád, to mean a devastator, despoiler. Whoever knows the nature of the Most High will recognize that He is all Light without a bit of darkness in Him at all. So, this shaddâ´y term does not describe Him at any moment. But it would certainly describe the adversary, IF it were found in scriptures, which it isn’t.
Here is one example just to show you its absence. Words in bold indicate presence in the LXX:
Genesis 28: 3 KJV (excerpt) And God Almighty bless thee…
Genesis 28: 3 (excerpt restored) – |he who [is] of the ones (n.) [~unpaired] not with regard for |the One (m.) [being] one causing to be existed (Yâ-hwéh), moreover, |[is] the demonic-power of ’aharón (light-capturer/lucifer) against of the ones (n.) [~unpaired] |of the one (m.) [~Envoy sounding the 7th trumpet] who spoke of Me; |the one causing to be existed (Yâ-hwéh) of Me who blesses the ones (f.) [~middle sisters] |[is] of the one (m.) [~true yisrâ’ë´l] [being] the ones (m.) [~144K] [being] you (sing.), |[being] the one (f.) [~principality (f.)] of one overcoming the demon (yisrâ’ë´l). …
Note the total absence of any term translatable as ‘almighty’ in the LXX restored excerpt, meaning that it was inserted with evil intent. Doing a word-search for shaddâ´y (H07706) in the KJV will show no such translatable terms present in LXX in the verses in which LXX has theos (G2316) (“God”), which as above restores to ‘demonic-power of ’aharón (“Aaron”)’.
The term “Almighty” does have a Greek LXX term, G3841 pantokrator (Upholder of all), which we examine in this list. When examining the KJV instances of “God Almighty”, it shows that whenever this pantokrator occurs in LXX, there is no “theos” associated with it found in the same verse, instead, kurios (H02962) (“Lord”) may be found, which restores to the dual-names ‘Yâ-hwéh Yâhuwshúa`’. Yet in these verses which have kurios and pantokrator found within it, the Masoretic Text has substituted ’ël (H0410) (“El”), to associate “God” with the pantokrator (Upholder of all) which they mistranslate as ‘almighty’, for which they wrongly substituted shaddâ´y (H07706) in the Masoretic Text.
There is one exception, however: both theos and pantokrator are found in one verse in the book of Job (`Iyyówv) 33: 4. But compare what has been omitted and altered to try to associate them. The KJV version says “and”, whereas the original says “but”. The two spirits/breaths compared are not the same one. The term ‘brimstone’ found there is theion, which is related to the demonic sulfur smells of a theos (demonic-power). The Masoretic scribes also apparently felt the need to change the last part of the verse to make it something misleading about the adversary, who blew out his last vestige of Light he had from his mother into the dirt-body image.
Job 33:4 (AV) The Spirit of God hath made me, and the breath of the Almighty hath given me life.
`Iyyówv 33: 4 (restored) – The spirit (n.) of the one [~sâţâ´n] over |the brimstone, the same one [~spirit] of one |not of the One belonging to the ones (n./m.) [~144K], |[is] the one (m./f.) [~spirit] making the ones (f.) [~middle sisters] become this other one [~false yisrâ’ë´l of ’avadówn], |[being] the ones (m.) of the one (m.) [~true yisrâ’ë´l] [being] Me. |The breath (f.) [is] against of the ones (m.), |but the one (m.) [~paired son, First ’Âthâ´m] [being] one causing to be existed (Yâ-hwéh), |originating from out of the Upholder (m.) of all, [is] over |she [~widow underneath], who [is] not of the ones (m.) [~144K], |the foolish boaster (hëylë´l) [~false yisrâ’ë´l of ’avadówn] who teaches that the ones (f.) [~daughters of Wisdom] |of the other one (m.) [~false yisrâ’ë´l of ’avadówn] [are] [being] the ones (m.) [~144K] [being] Me.
And what about the New Testament instances of “God Almighty”? They are all found in the book of Revelation. The omitted words change the meanings of the statement in Greek, which is much worse looking at the English words used to “translate” it. “Holy” is one of many HLL terms derived from the Hebrew hëylë´l, which means foolish boaster, and describes the false imitation material-biological “Israel” of sâţâ´n including him. Let’s show here what happened there, in the very worst instance, one quoted in a church hymn which is sadly so very catchy, because once one knows the Truth it becomes irritating to hear it. The words in bold are those which managed to enter the verse in some badly translated form:
KJV Revelation 4: 8 (excerpt) “…Holy, holy, holy, Lord God Almighty, …”
FPS Disclosure 4: 8 (excerpt) “…The same One Pure (m.) [~Yâ-hwéh (First ’Âthâ´m)] of the ones (n.) [~unpaired volunteers] |[is] the same One Pure (m.) [~Yâ-hwéh (Second ’Âthâ´m)] of the ones (n.) [~unpaired middle] |[is] the same One Pure (m.) [~Yâ-hwéh (Third ’Âthâ´m)] of the ones (n.) [~unpaired widow underneath]! |And Yâhuwshúa` [is] over the One causing to be existed (Yâ-hwéh) of the ones (n.) [~unpaired], |He [is] Who [is] of the ones (n.) [~unpaired] with no regard for |the demonic-power of ’aharón (light-capturer/lucifer) against of the ones (n.) [~unpaired]! |He [~First ’Âthâ´m] Who [is] not of the ones (n.) [~unpaired], [is] with regard for |the existent Man (’Iysh), the Upholder of all, over top of the ones (n.) [~unpaired]. …”
Sounding plausible, this nonspecific title, father (’av) Strong’s H01 (of the) sovereign (’adówn) Strong’s H0113 is actually one nearly universally recognized as referring to satan, when it is translated to Hebrew. ’avadówn is famously in the book of Revelation 9: 11 as “Abaddon“, which is transliterated instead of translated in establishment scriptures there. Before it being written there, and since then, ’avadówn was defined by them (Strong’s G3, and H011), mostly as a place of destruction and ruin, ‘Hades’, or an abstract ‘perishing’, ‘destruction’, but only admitting it to be the Destroyer as a secondary definition since this verse, Revelation 9: 11. Apparently their alleging it to derive rather from destruction terms similar to it (H06), not considering “father of the sovereign”, is part of a broad general erasure of ‘satan’ from scriptures in their scribal coding.
Probably because of this erasure of satan, the “son of perdition” (John 17: 12, 2 Thess. 2: 3) is not rendered as “son of the father of the sovereign (’avadówn)”, although this is a personification of the adversary, aka the antichrist. The term “perdition” in “son of perdition” is G684.
The instances of “Abaddon“ occurring in the Masoretic Text in the establishment OT, are six: Job 26: 6, 28: 22, 31: 12, Psalms 88: 11, Proverbs 15: 11, 27: 20. In every instance they were rendered as per the other establishment meaning in the LXX, which means the deception is ancient. It appears in LXX also as G684, and G622 once.
However, the most notable censorship of Abaddon is the fact that Abaddon G3 appears 1,889 times as a word omitted by the scribal code in the Morphologically analyzed LXX, accompanying every instance of mh G3361 (“not/lest”), and when restored, it is apparent it means “father of the sovereign“ and not mere destruction.
“Fortune”, as in distributor, is a term not found in English in your KJV. However, it possibly one of the words found most often in your KJV, but found in languages other than English in your English KJV. Fortune is found in Hebrew, “God“, “god”, and Mammon is how it’s said in Aramaic. The root of the Mammon word is the Aramaic word, מָמוֹנָא, which simply means “material possessions” or “material wealth”. The term also could be used as a name for the abstract concept of personified riches, but there is no evidence of people worshipping a מָמוֹנָא.
However, that Aramaic word means Fortune, and the translator from Hebrew to Greek knew that God (Fortune) was indeed being worshipped, and that it would lose its desired meaning if it were translated “demon” (Fortune in Greek). Note that as Yâhuwshúa` spoke in Hebrew to the people, He said Fortune in Hebrew: saying “God”, not “Mammon”. The KJV also avoids going back to the Hebrew to quote it as “God” and translates it as “Mammon”.
Are other terms redirecting your calls to the Most High to go to Fortune (the demon)? Fortune is also known as “deity” (from Latin deo), “Deus” (Latin), “Providence”, “Luck”.
But the most prominent reference where Fortune and what it is, is found in scripture in Yshá`Yâhuw (“Isaiah”) 65: 11. There is where it is ‘translated’ as “that troop” in the KJV. Here is H1408/H1409 in the Strong’s Concordance citing that Hebrew term Gad/gâd (capitalization does not occur in Hebrew):
In the Septuagint LXX, there in Isaiah 65: 11, this term appears as daimoni, Strong’s G1142.
1142. δαίμων daimōn, dah'-ee-mown; from δαίω daio (to distribute fortunes); a dæmon or supernatural spirit (of a bad nature):--devil.
1142. δαίμων daímon; de δαίω daío (distribuir fortunas); demonio o espíritu sobrenatural (de naturaleza mala):—demonio.
For doubters, simple math will do: if “God“ = “gawd” = G1409 = daimoni = G1142 = daimon = “demon“, then “God“ = “demon“. Imagine how difficult it is for English-speaking people to dissociate themselves from calling the Most High a demon, when learning that God = demon. That term was embedded in them for generations without synonyms and without knowing what it truly means, just like how “Dios” also was inculcated in Spanish speakers without synonyms and without knowing what it truly means. If you find it difficult to learn to reject these nicknames of the adversary forwarding your calls, consider the language that isn’t yours, and how easy it is for you to accept that Fortune is false. Do not allow them to confuse you by accusing you that to reject those call forwarding terms constitutes rejecting the Most High.
This term is codex terminology and can be found here. This term is one full nickname which the truly nameless one, the adversary, is given, is Gadariel (gad’ariy’ë´l) which is most often truncated to “God“, and even abbreviated as G in the Masonic symbol, “the Square and Compass”:
The term Gadariel is a combination of three Hebrew words: Gad/God (Fortune-distributor), ’Aríy (lion), and ’ë´l (demonic-power).
The lion-head in the symbol confirms who this symbol’s G is about: Gadariel. Not any other alleged meaning of “God“, nor much less “geometry”. One should expect lies from satanists, like the Freemasons. The lion Gadariel (demon-lion-demonic-power) specifically refers to the adversary, since the spawn of shame (yaldabaoth, yaldabosheth) was described as half-lion, half serpent in his hideous appearance when first seen by Wisdom. In recent times we all have seen the antichrist, Trump, repeatedly associate himself with a lion-image, since he makes clear he is the image incarnation of the adversary. And it is good to be fully aware that nowhere is the Most High described as a lion in restored scriptures, it is only the adversary who is the lion. The lion is a favorite image of satanists, who put it everyw
here in their symbols and even in their names (Ari, Ariel). See “the lion of Judah“.
This term is reckoned a title, not a name, by nonsatanist Christians, who for generation after generation, continue using this term to refer to the Most High in English. The Spanish counterpart, which is worth comparing is Dios. “God” is a very ancient term in Hebrew, pronounced exactly the same, and meaning the same adversary ultimately, as also explored in the entry Fortune. For a chosen brother believer, steering him to Strong’s H1408/H1409 is usually sufficient for these to change their minds to realize a change in their working vocabulary is indicated. Even so, it is a delicate operation: see the video “The Problem With God” found on our videos page.
Caution must be exercised when attempting to persuade a middle Christian away from this term, especially if they are monolingual, speaking only English. They will seek acceptable synonyms, at least, to brace their house they have built on sand in order to install the new Foundation. Savior, Father, Sovereign, King, and even Yâ-hwéh are insufficient alone to identify Him, and these cannot handle both of His dual-names Yâ-hwéh Yâhuwshúa`. Therefore, if they are not equipped to handle His true names due to their spiritual composition (see the Classification of the Population page), they can stumble badly, and they always fall towards the darkness, never towards the Light. Although one can show them that “God” has translations, what it substitutes for are also direct references to satan, as “the demonic-power of Aaron (’aharówn)“, but much more content than just this term is altered, so simply replacing it with satan will confuse them terribly. Therefore, it is more advisable to encourage Christians to strengthen what they do know true than to replace their foundation, during their life.
This term you hear frequently from satanist-jews, and whoever believing them that thinks our Savior’s names should be censored and unspoken. Review Acts 4: 17-18 how their satanist council, the Sanhedrin, commanded a world directive against the names of Yâ-hwéh Yâhuwshúa`, that they should not be taught or spoken. It was immediately rejected by His pupils, though it did likely result in their complete genocide by the satanists obeying this directive. In the “Heaven“ entry, it is shown that our Savior, the Most High, has dual-names.
The adversary did make a demon he named a single-name “Yahweh“, just to confuse everyone. It is the vanity, it does not “cause anyone to be existed”, though it “causes one to become” of the other one. Apparently, the prohibition against saying the names of Yâ-hwéh Yâhuwshúa` is against the name “Yâhuwshúa`” because eventually the satanists will re-embrace the name “Yâ-hwéh“ to use it on their impostor. But in the meantime, they keep it hidden in various ways: with false name versions, names with vowels redacted, name substitutes, and saying “the name” in its stead. The way one says “the dual-names” in Hebrew is ha-shimáyim. They don’t want to say that, they don’t accept Yâhuwshúa` is Yâ-hwéh. The way one says “the name” for a single name is “ha-shëm”, so in effect, this single-name ha-shëm is referring to the demon made by the adversary, not to the Most High.
Here is an ancient sham. It is apparent that the term “heaven” is frequently used in establishment scriptures as a substitute for the names of the Most High. It is even seen in the ancient Greek writings of philosophers. But “heaven” does not merely substitute for His names, it substitutes for “the dual-names”. You see, the Hebrew language has a special dual plural and a regular plural way to modify a noun. The way to make a noun a dual-plural has rules linguistically, depending on the vowel in the singular. The term “name” in Hebrew is “shëm”. The way to make that word a dual-plural is “shimáyim”. This resembles the way they spell “heaven” in Hebrew: “shâmáyim”, which has only one vowel differently. If one retro-engineers that word, to make it a singular noun, it would be the dual of the noun, “sham”. But “sham” is not a word in Hebrew.
In fact, Hebrew linguists admit that shâmáyim has the form of a dual-noun, but is “an exception”, saying that it has “no singular version”. It is an obvious lie. They refused to accept that Yâhuwshúa` is Yâ-hwéh, and they tried to cover up the fact that He has dual-names, which was mentioned everywhere, even in scriptures found in jars, but to hide it, they changed one vowel: i to â, and made a sham coverup so nobody would see He has dual-names. Could this be the origin of the word “sham” as a falsehood coverup?
When realizing “heaven” was a substitute for “dual-names”, many inspired scriptures anywhere containing “heaven” become clearer in their meanings. See for example, this verse from the Glad Tidings of Phílippos:
37. (33) The Father and the Son names are single, the breath of the Pure One causes to exist the dual-name, for they (The Father and the Son names) exist everywhere: (they exist) above, and (they exist) below, (they come to exist) by means of the concealed name and the revealed name. The breath of the Pure One is in the revelation, it is the hidden One above Who (the dual-name Pure One) exists below, within the one manifested below,
This term Immanuel is one which Christians quite often allege to be the name of our Savior particularly whenever their false name for Him is challenged or around the alleged season of His nativity, which was from a virgin. It comes from Yshá`Yâhuw 7: 14. remember that ’ël means demonic-power, exclusively. Thus that name is not about the Son. Here is the part of the verse, restored with the meanings of its pronouns, containing it:
Our Savior predicts that: when the nonsatanists which are currently in association with the satanists come to exist within Him, the satanists who were against a pregnant virgin of the nonsatanists among the 144,000, who was over and against being the satanic state of being continually pregnant, those satanists will call aloud a name that isn’t associated with the 144,000, a name against or concerning satan:
‘The unpaired middle ones being the false Israel of Abaddon are originating from out of the same Israel of the Son, and are against the demonic-power with us (Immanuel)!’
The very shortened version of that verse found in the KJV suggests that the virgin would be who calls His name Immanuel. It is not so, due to the many omitted words changing the meaning when restored. For details see the FPS translation of Yshá`Yâhuw 14: 10-14 on this website.
This expression can only be found in the codices, saying “too great or extreme to be expressed or described in words,” talking about the Most High and His characteristics. And it is written that He named Himself, due to no one being higher to name Him. His name does not contain everything about His characteristics, it is a description of one of His functions: One causing to be existed is the meaning of Yâ-hwéh, and Yâ-hwéh is wealth/freedom is the meaning of Yâhuwshúa`. But if this is not understood correctly, one can be vulnerable to be misled to think His name should “not to be uttered.” This lie leads to censoring His name, because of the considering it an “ineffable name”.
It answers the question the original name-censors had about how to manipulate people to cooperate with their censorship, to conceal our Savior’s contact information from His people. Scripture does say The One is ineffable. But it does not say that the names He called Himself are ineffable.
By introducing this disinformation, this represents a clever evil gimmick to persuade the ignorant to voluntarily never say His names. Oh, it’s “too great or extreme to be expressed or described in words”, which although true about the Most High, does not deny that He named Himself for one to call on Him. So next, the person voluntarily suppressing the urge to ever say His names or write them forgets them in this realm of forgetfulness. Thus, the censorship directive of the satanist council (Sanhedrin) in Acts 4: 17-18 uses this disinformation to excuse using various methods of lying to substitute out the true names of Yâ-hwéh Yâhuwshúa`.
Let no one naively expect those establishment translation’s verses to contain the very names they prohibited from teaching.
The motive for their strategy is stated in the Glad Tidings of Phílippos verse 13:
The authorities wanted to deceive the sons of the dirt-man (’âthâ´m), since they saw that these had kinship with those who are truly good: they removed the name [~Yâhuwshúa`] from those that are good and delivered it to become ones that are not good [~”Jesus”, “Yeshua”, etc.], so that through the names they might deceive them [~those that are good] and bind them to those that are not good. And afterwards, if He has favor on them, He shall cause them to separate from those that are not good so to integrate them among those that are good, these who have acknowledged Him themselves, for they [~the authorities] wanted to take the free man and make him a slave to them forever.
The short form of the written name of the Most High Yâ-hwéh, which is Yâ´hu, was deliberately adulterated by the satanist-jews, in accordance with the satanist-jewish tradition to censor His name, particularly when they first inserted vowel-points into the Aramaic Square Script alphabet during the 17th century. They put in the wrong vowel points into the name Yâ´hu to make it “Yâhh” to truncate it to prevent it from being pronounced through ignorance of its proper pronunciation. It is documented in the Midrash on Psalms (Mid. The. Pss. 68:3, 113:3) that they knew this was a partial incomplete name, so therefore using it did not violate their commandment of men to not say His name. From here, it is seen that this false rendition was rendered in the KJV in the Hebrew transliteration of hal’luw Yâ´hu as “Alleluiah” in Revelation 19: 1-6 (The KJV replaced it in every instance in Psalms with “Praise ye the LORD”), since the Yâ´hu was miswritten yâhh, and the y 6th letter y י was transliterated as an i and this same letter, in the 14th century was extended below the line as j to distinguish it from the small letter L, particularly at the beginning of words. This happened notably in KJV Psalms 68: 4 –
“Sing unto God, sing praises to his name: extol him that rideth upon the heavens by his name JAH, and rejoice before him.”
So jah came from this chain of errors to be accepted ‘as is’ without any proofreading by certain Christian sects.
Hebrew has a reasonable rule that spelling does not critically matter IF the resulting spelling accurately produces the exact same sound. But jah definitely is very different from Yâ´hu. Thus it is not equivalent.
Related to this satanist alteration of Yâ´hu, the short form of the name Yâ-hwéh, is their alteration of its form Yâ´huw- with the w 6th letter, which is different. The satanist-jews made a religious linguistic rule stipulating that whenever Yâ´huw- begins a name or word (which they call a “theophoric component”), they must censor the â and replace it with a silence letter “shwa” which is usually omitted in transliterations, or written as a superscript e, or just e. In the name of Yâhuwshúa`, this results in the name they placed in their Strong’s Concordance Lexicon’s Hebrew dictionary, where it appears as “Yehowshua”, which is invalid, pronounced differently, and not equivalent.
Another famous example is within the Profession of Yâ-hwéh term, Yâhuwthâ´h, which they alter to “Yehudah” to avoid professing Yâ-hwéh.
But another frequent satanist alteration of the same “theophoric component” -Yâ´huw, is when it occurs at the end of a name, where they truncate it just like the short form Yâ´hu, to “-yah”, which is invalid, pronounced differently, and not equivalent. This alteration went through the same alphabet alteration as “Jah”, to “-jah”, in famous KJV false names such as “Elijah”.
For more information on this linguistic evolution and its importance see our His names proven study.
But another frequent satanist alteration of the same “theophoric component” -Yâ´huw, is when it occurs at the end of a name, where they truncate it just like the short form Yâ´hu, to “-yah”, which is invalid, pronounced differently, and not equivalent. This alteration went through the same alphabet alteration as “Jah”, to “-jah”, in famous KJV false names such as “Elijah”.
For more information on this linguistic evolution and its importance see our His names proven study.
The seven mentions of “jealous God” in the KJV, including one allegation that His name is “Jealous”, are all referring to the adversary. They are Exodus 20:5, 34:14, Deuteronomy 4:24, 5:9, 6:15, Joshua 24:19, and Nahum 1:2. Several non-canonical scriptures document that it was definitely the adversary (ha-satan), the spawn of shame (yaldabaoth), who famously declared in a foolish throe of misled pride: “I am a jealous God and there is no God but me!” (Secret Book of John).
Therefore, it was the same adversary who rendered the canonical scriptures cherry-picked by the satanist infiltrator “church fathers”, to falsely allege it was the Most High Who said it. It is important to satan to deny it was himself because this mistake caused the undoing of his old cosmic order (old world order), which divided his house against him so ever since then, he has been working at recovering them as a ‘new world order’. For more details see the scripture reference and its context and far-reaching impact, and the webpage about satan’s divided house.
For whoever might want to see one of these seven verses restored to its original content, see this excerpt in question and compare the establishment version with its fully restored original content. For the context, please see it in the FPS translation, it is not found restored in any other translation known to date:
KJV (AV) (excerpt only)
– Exodus 20: 5 “… for I the LORD thy God am a jealous God, …”
FPS (excerpt only, format simplified: pronouns identified in italics, and the words which the KJV included are in bold:
– 2 Moshéh 20: 5 “… I am of the one (m.) true yisrâ’ë´l of the ones (f.) middle sisters, for the reason that being the One causing to be existed (Yâ-hwéh), the ones (f.) daughters of Wisdom of the one (n.) Yehuwthâ´h/sâţâ´n I cause to exist, are the Union of Me true yisrâ’ë´l.
Although of the ones (n.) against Yâ-hwéh Yâhuwshúa`, he Second ’Âthâ´m is, who of the ones (n.) unpaired middle is without regard for the demonic-power of ’aharón (light-capturer/lucifer) of the ones (n.) unpaired against of the one (m.) 7th Light-glistener, different Envoy of you who spoke, making the ones (n.) unpaired come to exist.
The demonic-power of ’aharón (light-capturer/lucifer) against of the ones (n.) unpaired is a zealot against of the ones (n.) unpaired, …”
Note, that the KJV renamed “LORD” (Bá`al) the One causing to be existed (Yâ-hwéh) and did not mention Him causing to exist the daughters of Wisdom into His Union. They did not mention those middle sisters who are unpaired and against Him don’t care for “God”, which is what they renamed the demonic-power of Aaron of the unpaired ones against the paired male of you who spoke, making them come to exist.
The last sentence says the demonic-power of Aaron against the unpaired ones is a zealot against the unpaired ones.
Who is the jealous one? The demonic-power they call “God”.
This errant rendition of the written name “Yâ-hwéh” is reportedly blamed on Petrus Galatinus in 1518, but this error reportedly occurs in manuscripts as early as the 14th century. It should not be blamed entirely on the gullible who erred by trusting the accuracy of the transcribed Hebrew scripture copies as rendered by the satanist Jewish establishment scribes. It was their father’s tradition to censor the names of the Most High which led them to deliberately write in the wrong vowels into the four-letter rendition of Yâ-hwéh (tetragrammaton), YHWH, in the Aramaic Square Script alphabet, to prevent anyone from pronouncing Yâ-hwéh. The vowels they chose to insert into YHWH instead of the linguistically correct ones, were the vowels found in the substitute terms they use traditionally to replace His written name Yâ-hwéh, depending on the context: either Adonay, or Elohim. See the two variations of their misspellings of Yâ-hwéh:
The “Jehovah” term which fooled the gullible was written with the vowels in “Adonay“, but the term with the vowels in “Elohim“ was not noticed. It would have been “Jehovih”. How did they choose which version to write? According to its context. Since the Jewish tradition was to always say “Adonay Elohim”, where their Masoretic would say “Adonay YHWH” they would write YHWH using the Elohim vowels; where their Masoretic would say “YHWH Elohim” they would write YHWH using the Adonay vowels.
But what could these artificial ghost words Yehowíh and Yehowâ´h mean, in Hebrew? To where do they forward your calls to the Most High? In your Bibles, the term “WOE” is found in both Greek and Hebrew: Greek Strong’s #3759 ouái is a transliteration of Hebrew Strong’s #01945 hówy or #0188 ’owy. The first-person pronominal suffix in Hebrew is -iy, which could be being added to #01930 how to form Hówy (my woe). This #01930 how also relates to #01929 hâhh, which could be an alternate spelling for Hebrew Strong’s #1943 Howâh, which means “ruin” or “disaster”. And the first letter Y on it resemble a verb conjugation in the third person masculine. These terms we mention here are not verbs, but if they were, they resemble Hebrew Strong’s #1942 Hawâhh which is described to mean to maliciously covet and rush upon to cause to fall/ruin, an engulfing ruin, destruction, calamity; compare #1943 mentioned above. Could our Pure Light Savior be called by such a name meaning all these things? No. Calling to “Jehovah” will definitely get you these things by call-forwarding.
This is a major false name which necessitated an entire webpage to cover sufficiently, the impostor’s name exposed, as well as part of His names proven. See those pages for more details about what is written here.
The name ‘Jesus’ appears only in the establishment scriptures’ “New Testament”, as a substitute name for Yâhuwshúa` our Savior, the Personhood of the Most High. Note that Moshéh also renamed his servant Howshë`a (the son of nun) as “Yâhuwshúa`”, and the Epistle of Bar-Nâvíy (“Barnabas”) 12: 8-11 says it was so Israel would heed him. This same name of this servant of Moshéh was Yâhuwshúa`. It appears in the KJV “Old Testament” as “Joshua”, not ‘Jesus’. But there are two times in the “New Testament” canonical scriptures where ‘Joshua’ was mentioned, KJV Acts 7:45, and Hebrews 4:8, but there the KJV reports the name, again, as “Jesus”.
The reason why is that Yâhuwshúa` in the “Old Testament” went through the Hebrew censorship of Yâ´huw- to “Yehowshua”, then to the English transliteration evolution to Iehoshua, Ioshua, Joshua, whereas the Yâhuwshúa` in the “New Testament” went through the same Hebrew censorship, followed by the Greek evolution and transliteration to Ihsou, Iesous to then go through Latin Vulgate Iesus, to then go through an English alphabet evolution of the letter i to j as Iesus, Jesus.
So the emotionally invested name of our Savior Yâhuwshúa` was replaced by ‘Jesus’ in the King Supplanter Version (KJV), and the less emotionally significant name of Yâhuwshúa` the son of Nun was also replaced by ‘Jesus’ in the New Testament of the KJV, although appearing as ‘Joshua’ in the KJV’s Old Testament. Our Savior’s name would also appear as ‘Joshua’, if it had not been totally erased from those scriptures by the satanist establishment’s scribes. But those unable to profess or accept our Savior’s true names currently, are often surprisingly able to believe the part about the OT ‘Joshua’ being reported as ‘Jesus’ in the NT, though unable to change their profession about our Savior.
As ‘Jesus’ is not the name of our Savior in Truth, it is one of two means of calling the beast holding itself to two horns (a horn is a method of calling) in Revelation Chapter 13: 11. The other horn, used by the Jews, is ‘Yeshua’.
Though not an often-used substitute for Yâ-hwéh Yâhuwshúa`’s first name of His dual-names, Jove is sometimes heard in oaths as “by Jove”, and it dates back to Roman times, and the establishment considers this a synonym for Zeus, which was the Greek (Hellenistic) name for the adversary (ha-satan), as Zeus was the head demon of the pantheon. The adversary was who persuaded the ancient Romans who took over Greece that Zeus was the same one as the Romans’ Jove, just as Jove relates also to Jupiter, as the history is the same (see the account in the entry Jupiter). Language and alphabets evolve, and transliterations need to keep up to date with its evolution for testimonies of proper names to stay the same. This was evidently also done by the will of the adversary (ha-satan), to keep the true names hidden.
The advent of sound recordings was relatively only recently, and before then it was by writings. And it should not be surprising that extracanonical scriptures kept out of the public canon document that it was the adversary (ha-satan) who invented languages and writing, in this realm of darkness and forgetfulness. The realm of Light has no forgetfulness and communication is in the form of Light in song. But here outside, information is recorded in writing in languages, and the many languages and alphabets and the fact all of them evolve over time, all serve the adversary’s purpose to alter and hide the true sound of the names in the Testimony, until sound recordings would be invented. So the current and best rendition of the dual-names of our Savior, the Most High, for English speakers, is Yâ-hwéh Yâhuwshúa`. But in ROMAN times, when they had a more ancient form of the Latin alphabet, THEIR best transliteration for the name “Yâ-hwéh” is IOVE. And two of these ancient letters evolved, here’s how:
During the Roman era, the Latin alphabet used V for both consonant (w/v) and vowel (u) sounds. During the medieval period, both rounded U and pointed V forms were used interchangeably, often as stylistic variations of the same letter (allographs). In the late middle ages, scribes often used V at the beginning of words and U in the middle or end, regardless of whether it was a vowel or consonant. This is called ‘positional usage’. And in the 1500’s, Italian printers began using the U for the vowel and the V for the consonant, a change that became standard by the 1700’s. The first recorded distinction of that happened in 1386 in a Gothic alphabet. The French Academy did not fully accept the distinction until 1762. This formal separation of the U and the V did not update when IOVE was rewritten, so it did not update to IOUE, which is more obviously a transliteration for Yâ-hwéh.
But to further hide the name Yâ-hwéh, the I in the ancient Roman IOVE was evolved to a modern letter J. This was explained in a famous booklet “the missing J” to show people that the J in “Jesus” was not found at all in the 1611 KJV which was written as "I", to prove that is a mistaken rendition of the name of our Savior, Whose hidden name is Yâhuwshúa`. The letter I was confused with the small letter L, “l”, at the beginning of words requiring its capitalization, so in the 14th century, the letter I was extended below the line at the beginning of words, as a J, which also explains the German pronunciation of that letter as an “I”. Then in the 16th century, the French assigned a different sound to the J i-letter, which matches the soft g sound in “gem”. This evolution of the I was applied to update the ancient Roman term IOVE to JOVE, further distancing it from being a current transliteration for Yâ-hwéh.
The fact that both of these transliteration mistakes go in different directions around the same time-period to both hide the true pronunciation of Yâ-hwéh prove that it was by conscious and evil intent, and thus it was the adversary trying to hide it.
This term “Jupiter” is the English evolution of a Latin term IOU PATER, which is the short form Yâ´hu evolved to a IU, followed by ‘Father’ in Latin, PATER. In ancient times, probably when Rome conquered Greece, the Romans were persuaded that the ‘father Yâ-hwéh’ they knew as IUPaTER was the same adversary the Greeks represented as Zeus. Thus, since then, Jupiter became known as the Roman version of the Greek Zeus. But how would the Ancient Romans have heard about Yâ-hwéh?
The Romans have ancient history found in the book of ‘Jasher’, Yâshâ´r, in chapters 59-63 which may have been redacted by the victors writing the history books. In the time period between the book of Genesis and the book of Exodus, the Romans are identified by their ancient name, Kittíy, seen also in Daniel 11: 30 as the sons of Kittim. In chapter 63: 10 – 64: 6, there is the account written of how Tsphów (Zepho) the son of ’Eliypház the son of `Ësâ´w (Esau), who was the king of the Kittíy (Romans), was requested of them (v. 22) to invoke the god of his ancestors Abraham and Isaac, help them in battle, against impossible odds.
And he did, and they were saved, for the sake of His name, although it is likely at least the military part was done by the impostor sâţâ´n’s Yahweh demon. Nonetheless, Tsphów forgot Who saved him and the sons of Kittíy (Rome) and the history continues in the Book of ‘Jasher’. Thus the Romans did know the name Yâ-hwéh and they remembered Him as IOU-PATER for a while, till the adversary assumed that identity making those names be considered equivalent to Zeus, the head demon of the Greek pantheon. Every establishment source out there says “Jupiter is how Romans say Zeus”.
You may have heard people calling the Most High a Judge, alleging He will judge, or has judged, and hosts a judgment day.
Scriptures appearing to be referring to the Most High Yâ-hwéh as judging or being the Judge include several in the KJV:
Deuteronomy 32: 36, Judges 11: 27, 1 Samuel 2: 10, 24: 15, Psalms 7: 8, 50: 4, 6, 72: 2, 75: 7 and more…
When all of these scriptures are correctly restored and translated, they are in full agreement with the extracanonical (“gnostic”) codices scriptures, in which our Savior clearly states that the adversary and his demons are the punisher(s), which have appointed themselves as the punishers of those they mislead to disobey the Most High or to violate laws of their own making.
Scriptures never contradict each other, when they are accurately rendered as per their original content. The fact they do is evidence they are altered.
However, they are restorable. Whenever we restore any of these scriptures translated from the coded altered canon, such as KJV, they do not refer to the Most High Yâ-hwéh as judging or being the Judge. But if one reads the establishment’s translation, it indeed clearly appears to accuse Him to be not just a judging Judge, but a randomly condemning judge. None of these accusations are true. For a good example of how the readers are misled by the canon’s altered scriptures, see Psalms 75: 7 and compare it with its FPS translation, Songs 75: 7.
And “day of judgment” is a mistranslation. “judgment” is krisis Strong’s G2920, which means a separation of a selection. This coming “judgment” is His separation of the nonsatanist middle yisrâ’ë´l He selected, out from among the satanist widow of yisrâ’ë´l underneath. Our Father does not punish. See who is the “Punisher”.
The term Kurie or “Kyrie” made popular in 1985 RD by Mr. Mister, has its roots in the Greek word kurios, which is often transliterated kyrios, which in English should be translated as “sovereign”, not “lord”. Its Greek use copies the Hebrew term ’adówn (Adon). It was used, systematically according to an established scribal code, in the Septuagint LXX and extant copies of all post-advent scriptures, to substitute out the dual-names of Yâ-hwéh Yâhuwshúa`.
We are the first to expose this big subject in our social media in 2015 Roman Date, the "lion of Judah" is not our Savior. Our Father Yâ-hwéh Yâhuwshúa`, the Lamb, is our Savior who overcame the lion. Some will say: “Prove it!!” We have gathered the necessary proof to prove it to you in the form of several videos and uploaded it to 144K Productions™ our Youtube channel here.
Below is a brief description of this entry, but for an in-depth explanation see our webpage.
This symbology widely accepted by Christianity and particularly worshipped by the Rastafarian religion, is based on one single altered and mistranslated verse in the King Supplanter Version (KJV) bible, in its Book of Revelation 5: 5, which reads as though the lion (satan) were the Victor (the Lamb, our Savior). We include verse 4 for context. Read it to compare with the restored verses:
4 (AV) And I wept much, because no man was found worthy to open and to read the book, neither to look thereon.
5 (AV) And one of the elders saith unto me, Weep not: behold, the Lion of the tribe of Juda, the Root of David, hath prevailed to open the book, and to loose the seven seals thereof.
But when the original content is restored, the large number of extra words display a meaning very different, consistent with the lion representing the adversary, for starters. See in the FPS full restoration, how the additional content entirely changes its meaning. The name of the KJV “Book of Revelation” in FPS is Disclosure, see Chapter 5: 4-5.
People seeking the truth will find different definitions of “lord”, “Lord”, and “LORD” depending on the various contexts of who they ask. Literally for centuries, Christian leaders (which are mostly infiltrated satanists) have told everyone that they “worship the LORD”, that “His name is the LORD”. But different liars having different testimonials is a sure sign of disinformation happening. It should be clear that since the ancient Hebrew alphabets have no capital letters, the later application of capital letters has no manuscript basis to justify any different meanings. Two different Hebrew words and a proper name in Hebrew were “translated” as “lord” but only one is correctly translated. The English correct meaning of “lord” is “owner, controller, possessor, and binding-husband (despot)”. It should be clear that demons which take possession of people’s bodies are lords, as correctly defined. The ‘lord of the flies’ (bá`al-zvúwv) is actually the ‘lord of death’, and thus the Hebrew word which is accurately translated by the English word “lord” is bá`al (baal). This term applies to any demon capable of possessing someone, so it is not a proper noun, not a proper name for the head demon either. Thus and therefore it should not be capitalized as “Baal”. The adversary was never acknowledged by our Father to be given any name, so merely saying baal-worship does not actually specify which demon.
But the other Hebrew word which was “translated” as “lord” was incorrectly translated: ’adówn (adon), which means “sovereign”. The Hebrew word “Adonay“ (’adonâ´y) means “my sovereigns” (plural), and is the commonly known term (see link). A sovereign has a very different meaning, of having an inner worth which earns one’s authority to decide and freely make one’s own decisions. That is usually a description for a king. The King is not a lord, a lord being a lower rank, as is still evident in British government which has both ‘titles of nobility’ still in use. The recent surge in the slogan that ‘Christ is King’ should draw attention to the difference in the false disinformation that the Most High would be merely a lord and not the King.
A sovereign is not a lord. But ’adówn (adon) has been “translated” as “lord” in the KJV, so many are misled to think it’s a synonym to “lord”. Confusion still prevails among them.
But the biggest stretch and blatant lie that happened over 8,000+ times in the KJV’s “Old Testament” alone, is that the generic term “lord” was utilized to erase out and substitute for one of the proper dual-names of our Sovereign King, Yâ-hwéh Yâhuwshúa`, namely “Yâ-hwéh” as misspelled in the Masoretic text (see “Jehovah“). To make it clear to anyone examining this crime (which has victims), the original “Yâ-hwéh Yâhuwshúa`” which was written 8,000+ times just in the books of the “Old Testament” was rendered in the already coded Masoretic text as “YeHoWaH/YeHoWiH“, but the King Supplanter Version (KJV) simply erases that out and substitutes “LORD” (or “GOD“) for it, both words having completely different meanings than Yâ-hwéh, which actually refer to demons.
The victimized congregations of Christian churches teaching this supplantation of their King for “the LORD”, whenever their pastors/preachers are asked, will lie to them, saying, “the LORD is the translation of His name,” which should possibly lead to the ridiculous declaration that “The LORD is King”, which would make it clearer that this is another one of the impostor’s usurpations of the identity of our Savior: baal is NOT our King!
This term, believe it or not, is announced, even proclaimed by some satanists as referring to the Most High, so we include it. But in order to prove it refers to the adversary and forwards your calls to the devil, one needs to learn much information not be vulnerable to disinformation. Lucifer means “light-bearer” in Latin, and it occurs exactly once in the establishment bible canon, in Isaiah 14: 12, and the Strong’s Concordance shows that translates the Masoretic Text entry H01966, hëylë´l. It happens to also be the only verse in the establishment bible canon which contains H01966, hëylë´l. The lexicon entries are relevant in their etymological explanation that hëylë´l derives from H01984 hâlál, which besides shining, it also means to praise, boast, or be boastful. In intensive conjugations such as hëylë´l, the lexicon says it thus means “to be (clamorously) foolish; to rave;” so we thus translate this hëylë´l as a noun, a foolish boaster.
Consider: would the Most High call the adversary a “light-bearer”? No. The Most High never gave the adversary a name, and never called him. Thus, “Lucifer” should not have a capitalized first letter, it is not a name to be a proper noun. Anyone believing satan carries any true Light is deceived.
The establishment however focuses on the shining to point out it can refer to the “day star”, the greater luminary orb, which is quite likely also true, given the multiple solar related words to hëylë´l, prominently including the Greek word helios. The day star we know as the greater luminary orb, radiates false light, not the true Light, and it is the star which misleads the adversary, which our Savior mentioned in the Gospel of Judas. The adversary has misled people to worship that day-star as “the Light”, and thus he and it foolishly boast to be Who they are not: the Light of the world.
Without considering the LXX, others assume this hëylë´l must be the “day star” (2Pe 1: 19) phwsphoros G5459, which means Light-bearer, or that it could be the morning star (Re 2: 28, 22: 16), but none of these seem to mean the same as Lucifer in Isaiah 14: 12. Thus much confusion exists.
But much more information is available when examining the LXX. The Greek term in Isaiah 14: 12 which was hëylë´l in the Masoretic Text was ewsphoros, which has no Strong’s Lexicon entry because it is not found in the Greek NT. Like phwsphoros, ewsphoros appears to be a compound of two words: G2193 ews, and G5411 phoros, which means a load (as borne). But ews has more depth. G2193 is translated officially as “till/until”, a preposition. But remember the translators of the LXX were satanists, and wished to not communicate the hidden truths in scripture, hiding them in codes and this way: the Hebrew word for ews was H05704 `ad עד. They knew the vowels would remain uncertain to those not understanding, because many words are spelled that way in Hebrew: H05703 eternal, H05704 until, H05707 witness, testimony, evidence, and more, but when finding ews H05704, one must consider it may be saying “eternal one”, or “witness/testimony”, not only “until”.
Therefore, the enigmatic ewsphoros appears to be a testimony-bearer. But merely replacing this into the KJV is insufficient for it to make sense, because many more words are missing due to coding: please see the fully restored verse in FPS, where it is made clear the daughters of Wisdom are who fell, but come to exist (originate) from the 144K, although the ones who originate from the 144K are not being the 144K who originate from the dual-names; but the ones against originating remaining unpaired are without regard for the 144,000 Witnesses of the Testimony of His name, the testimony-bearer.
Therefore, ewsphoros was not accurately considered by Jerome when the Latin Vulgate translation was being made, because the shorthand coding changed the meaning of the verse, and because the Masoretic scribes had changed the Hebrew word there which had meant ‘witness/testimony-bearer’ to hëylë´l. Jerome likely thought to be ewsphoros to be a misspelling for phwsphoros (light-bearer), so he was misled to trust the hëylë´l (foolish boaster) Masoretic insert, as it is not a possible translation for testimony-bearer, thus hëylë´l was a post-advent alteration because the LXX reflects an earlier more intact Hebrew original. The effect his mistake had was to replace the daughters of Wisdom being who fell, is to revise their satanic narrative about the adversary, to have him be who fell, presumably from out of the Light, though it is clear from many other scriptures satan was never in the Light, But if Jerome knew those scriptures, he should have known better, or he may have been persuaded by the satanist ‘church father’ infiltrators.
But believing this “Lucifer” lie is a large reason the satanists follow him, also gentrifying their definition of hëylë´l.
The LXX also has numerous omitted references to hëylë´l, found in the coding abbreviated into a mere letter h, similar to how sâţâ´n is found abbreviated into a single Greek letter ς. Assessing from the context of the many instances h hëylë´l is found and restored, it is apparent that hëylë´l, foolish boaster, apparently also refers to the false yisrâ’ë´l of ’avadówn, the “Israel” of the separation apart, which believes themselves outside to be at the top, and exterminates others. This elitism by outliving others they reckon inferior is being a foolish boaster shining the false light, together with their impostor antichrist bearing the false light, “Lucifer”.
Why is this term worshipped by some Christians, particularly among Roman Catholicism? They are misled to think this was the name of the biological mother of the dirt-body which was occupied by our Savior Yâ-hwéh Yâhuwshúa`. But look at the name that one actually had, which was the same as that of the mother of Moshéh, it was Miryâ´m. It was not “Maria”. Where did “Maria” come from? Look at the term used in Aramaic to translate the Hebrew ’adówn (Adon), which means “sovereign”. It is Mara.
However, whenever the Aramaic text was substituting Mara for the name Yâ-hwéh in its Aramaic translation, they wrote their own coded form of it, as Marya, which can also be transliterated Maria. Therefore, Maria is the Aramaic substitute term for the name “Yâ-hwéh” for Aramaic translations. Some translators of the Aramaic NT used this knowledge about this secret code to help restore mentions of Yâ-hwéh back into their NT translations.
Why did this coding and censorship need to happen? Because of the satanist edict of the satanist council (Sanhedrin) documented in Acts 4: 17-18 prohibiting the teaching the names of our Savior Yâ-hwéh Yâhuwshúa`, which explains its substitution, omission, and alterations everywhere it should be found, even the time-capsule Nag Hammadi scriptures. But it was hidden even before then, by the satanist scribes, since it was omitted from the Septuagint LXX by coding.
The Jews admit they worship the adversary, but have made up many names for it, because it was never called any name by the Most High, because it was never acknowledged by the Father of lights, Who did not consent nor was involved in its misconception alone by Wisdom when She fell. So the irony is not lost: the adversary is truly the nameless one, and his followers mill around like a disturbed anthill working to give it names, forcing everyone on their devices to capitalize the first letters of all their pseudonyms for it. But the Most High, Who plainly named Himself dual-names which have never changed for anybody, His opponents mill around like a disturbed anthill working to erase His dual-names throughout history, forcing everyone to not write it down or teach it, yet they allege Him to be the “nameless deity” if one searches for who it is online.
Online search says this about the skull that has been adopted by many of the military and other governmental law enforcement: “The Punisher symbol, a stylized skull, represents the Marvel vigilante Frank Castle’s mission of brutal, lethal justice against criminals. It symbolizes fear, strength, and vengeance, often associated with a "take no prisoners" mentality. However, its meaning has expanded to include military and law enforcement solidarity, as well as controversial adoption by political groups.”
But it is true that Seal Sniper Chris Kyle wrote in his autobiography about this symbol he adopted and championed, “I’m certain there are people who wear the Punisher without even knowing what it’s about,” and it is true, because we can attest that satan’s definition of “justice” is retribution, vengeance, and punishment, which is completely different from the Most High’s definition of correctness, righteousness (KJV), where He does not punish. He said He does not punish whoever disobeys what He says, but that there is one who does, which is the adversary.
The inspired scriptures left outside the establishment canon (e.g. the Secret Book of John) explain the emanation of Wisdom as one of the twelve Emanations of our Father of lights, Yâ-hwéh Yâhuwshúa` of the dual-names (ha-shimáyim in Hebrew), and Wisdom is called the Wife of the Son, and is described as the only emanation that fell, before she conceived in her mind the daughters which are yisrâ’ë´l outside of Him (referred to below as ‘the host’), for which He paid the Ransom on the cross to save.
And before Her fall, He alone conceived His children, the 144,000 of the principality (f.) which did not fall, which originates from out of His dual-names, and know their Way back to Him, because they were not separated from their Envoy-Twin emanations of the Son, whereas the host (army) from the daughters of fallen Wisdom, Who was separated from Him at her fall, are yisrâ’ë´l of the separation apart. Understanding this will help assist in understanding the meaning of the restored text which was rendered as “the Queen of Heaven” in the KJV.
Found five times in the KJV book of Jeremiah (7: 18, 44: 17-19), when restored and translated from the Greek LXX (which is known to reflect an earlier more intact scripture than the Masoretic), the isolated mention in 7: 18 appears as, “…and not being the one (f.) [~principality] being over the host (army) and not being the ones (m.) [~144K] originating, are against originating from out of the dual-names (m.)”, then each of the mentions in Chapter 44: 17-19 appears as, “…and not being the one (f.) [~principality] over the Queen [~Wisdom] or being the ones (m.) [~144K] originating, are against originating from out of the dual-names (m.)”.
The identification of the pronouns in FPS restored scriptures is done by context, gender, number, and the singular female pronoun “the one (f.)” refers to the principality of the Most High, which in Greek is arche, first mentioned in the canon in Genesis 1: 1 as “beginning” in the KJV. These 144,000 are called the true spiritual tribe of the Profession of Yâ-hwéh (Yâhuwthâ´h), since He calls these by name. Conversely, the principality (f.) of the adversary (satan), who also came as Yehuwthâ´h (“Judas”), the false heart (f.) of the yisrâ’ë´l of ’avadówn (Abaddon), who are not called. This other group is a carnal tribe calling itself a different pronunciation sounding like the name of “Judas”, and although they are a singular feminine pronoun, are not the one (f.) over Wisdom (when She was fallen).
Wisdom was restored to Her state at the moment before fallen because of Her repentance, and is ready to undo Her error once every single one of Her daughters is out of the realm of darkness. She, outside of the darkness outside of its time dimension, is restored to Her position and is one of the twelve. But She adheres to the Son in each son’s marriage chamber, and is not to be worshipped alone without Him, as He is The One to worship, and it is an error for yisrâ’ë´l of the separation apart to try to worship Her alone since they cannot retain the Son, and are against originating from His dual-names.
This is the mystical (secretive) term in Judaism trying to express the indwelling Presence of Yâ-hwéh Yâhuwshúa` within the 144,000 sons of His principality, particularly visible and manifesting when these are purged of the fiery one, the satan-emanated néphesh of the flesh, after the “allotment to the Pure One” of them by the adversary at the Sixth seal.
These purified ones will be pure ones, as our Savior was when He was also incarnated in a dirt-body, and as He also could shine His true Light, these pure ones also will. These 144,000 also did the same after their redemption following His resurrection, and this was depicted as “halos” in early Christian illustrations, as characteristic of “saints”. But both “halo” and “saint” are terms with satanic derivations, and wrong to use. The references to Yâhuwshúa` shining are hidden in the KJV translated as other words (Strong’s #5316), and the Presence also (Strong’s #3952, 4383) which is what “shekinah” translates.
This shining does not happen in the ones of yisrâ’ë´l outside, still of the separation apart (e.g. FPS 1 Thess. 5: 3).
The adversary’s “allotment to the Pure One” (our Savior) is the adversary “conceding” that the 144,000 are His, but the mistaken side of it, at the Sixth Seal opening, is when the adversary, posing as the false “Yâ-hwéh”, takes possession of the dirt-bodies of pruned middle nonsatanists, who by then still won’t have come to exist within the Most High (as per their inability due to their spiritual composition at the time). This misled appropriation of who do not belong to him, merely due to owning their material bodies, is what the adversary calls the “`âzaz’ë´l” (to strengthen the demonic-power).
But Yâ-hwéh Yâhuwshúa` has no regard for the adversary and these concepts are detestable to Him, the pruning from His anointing which happens at that time has a purpose for the Ransom from spiritual death to be applied. The adversary’s false “Yâ-hwéh” hates those middle nonsatanists he takes over, and dismisses them into the underworld into another captivity, from which they are freed and resurrect by the true Yâ-hwéh within the 144,000. This is the sign described in Revelation 1: 1 (when restored).
In 2017 RD, we made an earnest effort to uncover the hidden meaning behind the use of the homonym "sun" and its association with directing mankind's worship away from the Most High. We shared our findings on our YouTube channel, where the video remains available today. You can view it at the following link.
From the earliest times in history, the adversary has caused the gullible to worship the greater luminary orb with its false material light, even back to Adam. The adversary uses it as his ‘star’, and it is accessible to his demons, and there are even unaltered videos of UFOs entering therein. Thus the adversary pretends it is his version of “the father”, and his person is “the son” in his impostor scheme.
This would be “Abaddon”, but nonetheless also thrives on a cheap dirty trick of having it be called, in not just English, a homonym of “the Son”: “the sun”. And many religious terms in many languages are solar, especially since the Eastern Roman Emperor Constantine combined solar worship with Christianity, which was a political move to strengthen his dying empire with a unified state religion, flooding Christianity with paganism. We have heard reports of the adversary personally attending higher Freemasonry meetings, where he has his followers address him as “the son”. This term is just a nonspecific term so one cannot use it alone to positively identify our Savior, since capitalization is not verbally audible.
One should also note that in restored scriptures, the adversary is sometimes referred to as ‘the son among the ones (m.) within yisrâ’ë´l’, since he is among us but not of us. The adversary was a misconceived bastard son of Wisdom, without the participation nor consent of our Father. But he blew out the only vestige of Light he ever did have from his Mother, into the dirt-man image, to make it become a living néphesh (“soul”).
It should be clear from 1 Corinthians 8: 5 that there are many sovereigns, therefore one should never rely on invoking a simple title as being sufficient to make a positive identification of our Savior. A sovereign is one having the supremacy to have the self-earned power to make decisions. The description is fitting to a King or royalty. But even the ruler of this false cosmos in the realm of darkness is called the prince of darkness, and that one is the sovereign ’adówn (adon) referred to in the term ’avadówn (Abaddon). So if ever one might apply this general term to our Savior, include both His dual-names also, to not have call-forwarding to the sovereign adversary. And avoid using the Hebrew term unless you are speaking only in the Hebrew language, because communication is to speak to listeners in their languages, and to be unifying and not divisive.
This is a Greek term meaning “four-letter word”. It refers to the four letters used in Ancient Hebrew, before the vowels were written into that language, to spell the first name of the dual-names of our Savior Yâ-hwéh Yâhuwshúa`. The name Yâ-hwéh was spelled with Hebrew letters transcribed as YHWH.
Before the division of languages at the Tower of Babel (Bâvél), there were no vowels written because people knew the linguistic rules of the vowel sounds, so they were not written. But when Hebrew was in danger of extinction as a language, the Jews wrote in the vowels in new symbols inserting them into Hebrew written in the Aramaic Square Script alphabet. But our Latin alphabet uses vowels, so YHWH is not pronounceable as transcribed from a vowel-less ancient alphabet. This confuses some to think it’s ineffable, or that it is not meant to have any vowels, but it is easy to determine which vowels go in it linguistically from the rules already written, when knowing the proper pronunciation of the ancient letters, not the “modern Hebrew” version.
As such, “tetragrammaton” is merely a Greek description of the writing of His first written name, without the hidden name Yâhuwshúa`. It is not a substitution worth anything. Moreover, “barbelo” is the Aramaic version of “four-letter word”, and it was used by Judas in the “Gospel of Judas” by him, satan’s incarnation, when he stated he did know Who Yâhuwshúa` was/is. But his unwillingness and inability to acknowledge Him, ever, is why the adversary will never enter the Light.
This Greek term is the correct translation for ’ël (El) which means an exclusively demonic-power, in Hebrew. Because of scribal coding omissions, it was redefined by the adversary’s establishment as also meaning good powers, but that is part of satan’s disinformation. The term theos etymologically derives from the term for sulfur, since demons smell of sulfur (see Greek Strong’s G2303 and G2306 and the resemblances between all the theos terms relating to them).
Thus redefined, it was extensively deployed into the religious terms used by Christianity, in every term with a prefix “theo-”. For more information see our webpage elohíym is wrong: ’elohíym is not my Yâ-hwéh.
This term is a truncated false rendition of the short form of the name Yâ-hwéh, which is Yâ´hu or its prefix form Yâhuw-. This “Yah” false name is an altered false version approved by Judaism which censors His true names (Midrash on Psalms (Mid. Teh. Pss. 68:3, 113:3)), because it is a false name, and the full explanation is found in our name study, His names proven.
This term is incompatible with every written form of the name of Yâhuwshúa` because it takes absolutely no account for the sixth Hebrew letter waw in it (W) which is found in the form of a shuwrëq (UW) in every single written instance of this name in Hebrew scriptures, which appear as “Joshua” in the KJV. The history of it reportedly is that during the 1960s, certain groups wanted to revive using our Savior’s true name, but evidently, seeing the YHW at the end of names being falsely rendered as “-jah” in the KJV, or the “Jah” of hal’luw Yâ´hu in as it appears in the KJV, they were misled to use this mistaken form as a prefix, even though the name of Yâhuwshúa` always has the shuwrëq (UW). The adversary did anticipate the reemergence of the true name Testimony in these end-times by the return of the sons who remember His true name, and preempted it with a slew of false versions we call “near-miss names” to produce groups with legalistic bad fruits, because they resemble the Truth but nonetheless miss the mark.
When probably good-intentioned people with inadequate information sources shallowly investigated His names, seeking to clear what is wrong with the establishment terms, they came up with mistakes such as this term. The flawed method these used to determine their version, is merely taking the term Yâhuwthâ´h, which they see rendered as Yahuwdah, because it is spelled YHWDH, and they noted without the D it would be the same as the tetragrammaton so they subtracted the D to make this term. They also did not see the ending -eh as having a basis in Hebrew, not having studied it, and falsely accused it of “being feminine”. It is documented and explained and debunked in our name study, His names proven.
When probably good-intentioned people with inadequate information sources shallowly investigated His names, seeking to clear what is wrong with the establishment terms, they came up with mistakes such as this term. The flawed method these used to determine their version, is assume that “Yahweh” is mistaken, not knowing the reason the “hw” syllable is shortened to a silence, and expanding it as in the short form of Yâ-hwéh in the Yâ´huw- prefix. It is not linguistically accurate. It is documented and explained in our name study, His names proven.
Yâ-hwéh is called the written name, the first of the dual-names Yâ-hwéh Yâhuwshúa`.
The adversary, through his satanist scribes who did the coding according to satan, only wrote the single name YHWH (YeHoWaH/YeHoWiH) in their Masoretic Text (which is Hebrew scripture coded into shorthand code) whenever the original had said both dual-names Yâ-hwéh Yâhuwshúa`.
And into their Septuagint (LXX) translation to Greek they wrote Kurios instead of YHWH wherever the original said Yâ-hwéh Yâhuwshúa`.
But that apparently was not enough. For all those single-name mentions of YHWH in the Hebrew Masoretic text, the English King Supplanter Version (KJV) itself also substituted the supplanter (bá`al/lord) for the King wherever His dual-names had been present in the original, over 8,000 times. But we know that this merely means there were over 8,000 times the dual-names Yâ-hwéh Yâhuwshúa` was mentioned.
For whoever demands to see our originals, the original content is ascertained by one understanding the message decoding and restoring the translation. Accurate copies of faithfully coded transcriptions are publicly available.
Since all 8000+ times Yâ-hwéh was omitted from the KJV were actually DUAL-name instances of Yâ-hwéh Yâhuwshúa`, what about the times where “Yâ-hwéh” was mentioned alone in the original?
ALL of those times Yâ-hwéh was mentioned alone were ERASED by the coding method.
You can find where it was in the Codes.doc in the FPS download as the Strong’s number code 2962 (kurios) or kurion. All were omitted from coded Analytic LXX.
Therefore “YHWH” (Yâ-hwéh) has been omitted FAR MORE times than 8,000!
But why were ALL the single-name mentions of Yâ-hwéh omitted?
Because there are TWO different Yâ-hwéhs, One is our Father the true Yâ-hwéh, and the other is not even one of us, being the false ya-hwéh, which is a demon that satan created and named it that single-name, which whichever nonsatanist discovers it usually stumbles completely, not knowing there are TWO, and throws out the name ENTIRELY because he learns just how BAD this demon is. You may even have met some of these, who busy themselves pointing out all the historical negative things which that ya-hwéh has done.
So, how can one usually distinguish which is Which when decoding?
By means of context, but most often because the TRUE Yâ-hwéh is described as ‘the Yâ-hwéh of Me’ (and it is Him dictating the scripture), whereas the FALSE Yâ-hwéh is described as ‘the Yâ-hwéh of the one (m.)’ but using a Hebraism that says that ‘when there is more than one, the other “one” is translatable as “other one” because it’s implied’. So, we often write in that instance, the standardized linguistically correct ‘the Yâ-hwéh of the other one (m.)’, wherein the other one (m.) is, as we have found, of ’avadówn (“Abaddon”).
But there is even more we found, which needs to be shared in view of the fact that the satanists mislead others to mispronounce things.
A long time ago perhaps around 2004 or so, I personally was in communication online with a very prominent Hebrew linguist, Anson F. Rainey, in the state of Israel, and discussed with him his knowledge about the linguistics of Yahweh, and even of Yahuwshua (although he did not have our beliefs because he had converted to Judaism from having been raised Christian). He described Yahweh as being a verb which he believed was a Hiphiyl conjugation. Then, he explained to me what vowels would be used in a Hiphiyl conjugation of the verb, which would use a patach short “a” which is NOT how we have published Yâ-hwéh always, before or after that, because we had and have come to the definite conclusion that the first vowel in Yâ-hwéh is a qamets â, which sounds like a short ŏ in English.
But when he told us this, we experimented with this name he described, which would be transliterated, using our method consistent with the Strong’s Lexicon, as “Ya-hwéh” instead of Yâ-hwéh, but we immediately noticed a silence with no inspiration, which stopped when we switched back. It was then that we researched which were the vowels that are used according to the particular verb conjugation type, which appears in our name study, His names proven, copied from the Gesenius Hebrew Grammar appendix.
The vowels we were using for Yâ-hwéh, which acknowledged Him, were found to be exactly as per those found in the Hophal conjugation, giving us a new understanding of the meaning of His written name, and linguistic basis for the qamets â being in there.
Notice that the MEANING of a Hiphiyl “Ya-hwéh” is also DIFFERENT than the HOPHAL conjugation we have been proclaiming.
The false Hiphiyl “Ya-hwéh” means “He causes to become” and would have been transliterated IAUE for the Romans instead of IOUE, which did not happen.
The true Hophal Yâ-hwéh means “He causes to be existed”, and goes consistent with the ancient Roman transliteration of IOUE
(both Hiphiyl and Hophal are causative but Hophal is passive, -be existed)
So look at how this meaning fits the way it is found in decoded scripture:
The “Yahweh” of the one .... becomes .... The one causing to become of the other one (the thing, the adversary, that is not even one of us at all)
The Yahweh of Me .... becomes .... The one causing to be existed of Me (which also implies even the unpaired are of Him)
So thus it is likely that when satan’s false Yahweh singular ha-shëm adopts that name, you may be hearing “Ya-hwéh” with a short patach “a” as Anson Rainey was saying. They will get no clue from their writing “Yahweh” that their pronunciation is mistaken, nor be made aware that there is a second, hidden name in His dual-names.
Nonetheless, we will continue professing the Most High, saying and writing and pronouncing Yâ-hwéh Yâhuwshúa` with the qamets “â” which sounds like a short ŏ in its first of two dual-names, which is “ha-shimáyim”, a good response to whoever might tell you “hashem” in Hebrew.
But the confusion (aka Babylon) is made worse by satan having made a demon and named it “Ya-hwéh”, and erasing single-name mentions and making dual-name mentions single, and since satan also erased mentions of himself (2,031 coded as “S”, sâţâ´n 1,889 as <3> ’avadówn, and h hëylë´l 1,946 times) quite frequently the Bible reader will not know that it was satan speaking certain quotes. The false single-name Ya-hwéh is thus the basis of the confusion created by satan.
Some say, not knowing the spelling of this term, that it is a Hebrew word meaning “He saves”. It is not, though it does sound like it. The word that DOES mean “He saves” is found several places in the “Old Testament” scriptures, and examining the context, it is apparently referring to the antichrist, NOT to our Savior. But this “Yeshua” is spelled Y-Sh-uW. This three-letter word is actually an acronym for “Yemach Shemow Wzikhrow”, which in Hebrew means “May His name and memory be erased”. Why would it mean such a thing? Who would do such a thing? There was a rabbinic anti-Christian document, called the “Tales of Yeshu” (Toldoth Yeshu) dating back to 400 CE, which had plagiarized the Glad Tidings of MattithYâ´huw, and added lies and scorn, accusations and mockery. According to the “Tales of Yeshu” (Toldoth Yeshu), the original name of our Savior was Yâhuwshúa`, but when He “became a heretic/lunatic”, His name was changed to Yeshu, this acronym YSW
So this acronym passing itself off as “He saves” is the term most often adopted by Jews to supposedly refer to Yâhuwshúa`, but with the hidden agenda to help erase His name and memory. As ‘Yeshua’ is not the name of our Savior in Truth, it is one of two means of calling the beast holding itself to two horns (a horn is a method of calling) in Revelation Chapter 13: 11. The other horn, used by the non-Jews, is ‘Jesus’.
Some people make reference to the Most High by writing these letters, without attempting to pronounce them or assign any vowels to it. The four letters attempt to transcribe those used in Ancient Hebrew, before the vowels were written into that language, to spell the first name of the dual-names of our Savior Yâ-hwéh Yâhuwshúa`. The name Yâ-hwéh was spelled with Hebrew letters which would be correctly transcribed as YHWH. But this is correct according to the Ancient Hebrew original pronunciation of the letters.
But the problems are several when people do not know the proper pronunciation of the ancient letters, and trust in the “modern Hebrew” version. The sixth Hebrew letter originally was a W, and it can appear as a W or an oW or a uW. But the Jewish speakers of Hebrew changed the pronunciation of several letters in their alphabet in their “modern Hebrew”, and the 6th Hebrew letter adopted a different sound, that of an English V, probably because the German W has that sound.
Therefore, if you see someone write YHVH, then you understand why it is mistaken: they applied “modern Hebrew” Ashkenazi mistakes to their transliteration of ancient Hebrew letters.
See the Tetragrammaton and Barbelo.
Strong’s lexicon entry for Zeus:
The next term, G2204 resembling it suggests that Zeus would mean ‘glower’. But seeing as Zeus is the head demon of the Greek pantheon, Zeus is the adversary, and if he can glow, it would just be to deceive others. The main false alternative name of Zeus being used everywhere by Spanish speakers thinking to address the Most High, is Dios. They get call forwarding.
Another alleged synonym for Zeus mentioned here, in the Strong’s entry, is “Jove”, which in Roman Latin would have been IOVE, which is IOUE, and this is most certainly a transliteration of Yâ-hwéh. See the entry for Jove.