top of page

SEARCH SITE

Report any issue with "No results found"

Search this site

Results found for empty search

  • The Way | Yâ-hwéh Yâhuwshúa`

    "The Way of Yâ-hwéh (Dérekh Yâ-hwéh)", is the original faith all of scripture speaks of, from the OT onward throughout the NT. THE WAY OF YÂ-HWÉH YÂHUWSHÚA` “Come, follow Me” - The Way of Yâ-hwéh Yâhuwshúa` The Way of Yâ-hwéh Yâhuwshúa’ is mentioned several times in properly translated scriptures and inspired extra-canonical scriptures. Yet there is very little understanding about The Way among the Christian teachings, and this is because their pastors do not have the Spirit of Truth nor an Ear to discern meanings beyond what Yâ-hwéh Yâhuwshúa’s` literally said that “He is the Way, the Truth and the Life.” Although Yâ-hwéh Yâhuwshúa` is indeed The Way, the Truth and the Life, one needs to expand more on His saying to receive more understanding about what Yâhuwshúa` meant. Before anything else, to understand Him, one has to first obtain His spirit of Truth by way of acknowledging that He is Yâ-hwéh Who is our Savior, Who took on a dirt-body form, dwelt among us, then was crucified as the slaughter Offering Ransom for us, yet rose from the medically-dead state three days later; this is Yâhuwshúa`, Who is Yâ-hwéh. If you believe He actually did this and that His names are really Yâ-hwéh Yâhuwshúa` and worth switching away from the false names circulating, then we may proceed. Yâhuwshúa` said, “Come, Follow Me,” Would You Like To Know Where He Was Leading His Followers to go First? Yâhuwshúa` led His followers to the Cross. Indeed, everyone who desires to have a Life in Yâ-hwéh Yâhuwshúa` will eventually be a persecuted believer – 2nd Letter to Timótheos 3:12. And therefore, If you believe in following the Life, death, and resurrection of Yâhuwshúa` of the Anointed One, you’re walking The Way of Yâ-hwéh Yâhuwshúa’, overcoming the struggles with this world by means of Him with the goal to return to our Land, our Home (before our fall) and leave this material world (and its temp creator) behind. These with Him within are now wearing His Resurrection and are unafraid and unashamed to strip off their filthy dirt-garment and trample them under our feet because these are His little Ones, who will see the Son of the Living One and not be afraid. In the meantime, they wear His Resurrection as His promise to them until the Sixth Seal after when their inner-Man gets revealed; this is the Life in Yâ-hwéh Yâhuwshúa`. Preferring Him Over Everything and Everyone is the First Commandment In MattithYâ´huw 19:21 Yâhuwshúa` tells a worldly (rich) man to give away his wealthy material possessions and to follow Him, to be made perfect. But because choosing to follow Yâhuwshúa`, the Cross or the Narrow Path, is a difficult thing for one who is not yet favored of Him, one such person cannot do this even if he thought of himself to be a strong man. Preferring Him over everything and everyone is the First Commandment. The true followers of The Way of Yâ-hwéh Yâhuwshúa’DO this when these acknowledge Yâ-hwéh Yâhuwshúa` by His names and esteem Him as being our TRUE husband; therefore, they do not place any carnal husband or wife over Him, if those reject Him, these are free to leave them. The true followers of the Way of Yâ-hwéh Yâhuwshúa’ also leave (biological) material fathers, mothers, brothers, children and anyone else who hates Him or opposes our preferring Him (our walk) to follow our Savior Yâhuwshúa`. The true followers of the Way of Yâ-hwéh Yâhuwshúa’ are openly witnesses for Yâ-hwéh Yâhuwshúa,` and only these can witness for Him because these are His living temple and are all spokesmen for Him; and this kind of walk, is the Way of Yâ-hwéh Yâhuwshúa’. Believers of The Way of Yâ-hwéh Yâhuwshúa` Believers of The Way of Yâ-hwéh Yâhuwshúa’ first sought forgiveness from Yâ-hwéh Yâhuwshúa` for following after His accuser (satan/ the ways of this world or wide path), to now walk the Narrow Path; this is why, before Yâhuwshúa` came, Yâhuwchânâ´n the Immerser came to till the Land to prepare it for the Seed of Life, meaning to immerse them in repentance (change of mind) before Yâ-hwéh, wherein they regretted their sins and changed their behavior and closed their ear to further suggestions to continue such behavior. But forgiveness from their sins came when they prayed to our Father by the name of Yâhuwshúa` and being immersed in His name (having His name on your mind always) functions as a repellent for evil spirits; this Word is the Truth (of Yâ-hwéh) and those who prefer the Word of the Way Yâ-hwéh Yâhuwshúa` follow Him wherever He goes. Are You One of His Chosen Ones? The many are called but few are chosen – by our Father – to believe in Yâ-hwéh Yâhuwshúa` by means of His true names and this is to worship Him in Truth. No Lie is useful to pertain to Him because all lies come from the adversary, the father of the Lie. The ones chosen to be unshakable, this life-time around, because we have had prior lives (nativities), we have died every day (a thousand year day) because we had forgotten His name, but now you have heard it, His true name, as it truly sounds from Him, so are you chosen to believe in Yâ-hwéh Yâhuwshúa` by name unshakeably? This webspace is where some of His spiritually winged-creatures have set up a table to feed newcomers the true Bread from heaven, Yâhuwshúa’s name; will you say "mân" ("manna" = what is it?) and leave Him because you desire different food? Understand that He is pure and won't accept a corrupt perversion of His name, so to be reckoned righteous in His sight you must switch to His true name. Then your true spiritual eyes, His vision-Source, will be opened and you will be able to see what is right and what is wrong, and walk with Him on His Way unshakeably, if you are chosen - "elect" - so don't delay any more if you are chosen! And make up your mind quickly because time is short, and you have to grow and get ready for His return! Are you chosen? A to be continued mission in this material chaos... For more information about The Way of Yâ-hwéh Yâhuwshúa` , please read our written scripture-researched study on The Truth about Marriage . To obtain your FREE copy of the FirstFruits.' Purified Scriptures (FPS) in MS Word (doc.) format click on the menu tab under 'Free Scriptures.' Back to Top We are follower s of The Way of Yâ-hwéh Yâhuwshúa ` , the Narrow Path, and by the supports of Wisdom, we only follow Yâhuwshúa`our Husband, Who said He is "the Truth, the Way, and the Life."

  • who are the vril - ariel | Yâ-hwéh Yâhuwshúa`

    - The enemy's favorite letter demon-god ariel god-demon Vri-l, in Sumerian word = "like god or god-like". Abbreviated as V. These are lizard reptiles morphed as people, very much like those in V, the 1980s Final Battle TV Series. Proverbs Chapter 6 12. The lord to ascend ( Bliyyá`al ) [ ~a good-for-nothing ] of Yisrâ’ë´l, and an outlaw transfers to ways of you which [are] not good, 13. but he who [ is ] without regard of Yâ-hwéh, the same One [ is ] the Son, he signals with the eye, moreover of Yâ-hwéh he gives a sign with the foot, even teaching of Yâ-hwéh with the signals of the fingers, “peace” 14. but with one (f.) having thoroughly distorted the mercy pertaining to the heart (f.) of Yâ-hwéh, he contrives evil things (n.) within, among the ones (m.) of Yisrâ’ë´l during every time-period, he who [is] without regard, such as this, organizes disturbances against the City.

  • The Population Classification Chart| Yâ-hwéh Yâhuwshúa`

    According to inspired scriptures, there are three types of people in the world today. These are psychical, the spiritual and the earthly. CLASSIFYING THE COMPOSITION OF THE POPULATION: According to Codices According to several codices there are three types of population [one codex uses the word “phoenix” (winged-creature) instead of dirt-man] in this world (cosmos), until the end of the world [age/cosmos]. Their circumstances are compared to the three kinds of wing-creatures of pardeç "paradise"(as seen outside of time). The reason for the different descriptions is because during this age, dirt-men and winged-creatures are two of the 4 spiritual animals. Néphesh (“soul”) means insufflation and can be either from The One of Light, or from the one of the darkness. An insufflation from the Light is immortal but the one from the darkness is not. According to one treatise, the composition of the population of this world consists of (1) a body originating from darkness and fire ; (2) a néphesh (“soul”) brought forth through the defilement of the winds and the demons; (3) a particle of Mind (rescued by Spirit) and to whom our Savior granted a Light called ‘Trust’ (“pistis/faith”) and Thought produced by the ‘astonishment’ (EKSTASIS) of the Spirit (4). The Greek word EKSTASIS, from which comes "ecstasy", literally means being outside of one’s self, and is traditionally misinterpreted by scholars translating it as being crazy, astonished, out of sorts, “beside yourself”. But EKSTASIS describes The Mind’s literally transporting outside of one’s self, resulting in the Thought – the response given from the inquiry of the Mind to Yâ-hwéh Yâhuwshúa`, Who gives freely from the treasures of knowledge and Wisdom. So, 'Thought' is a result of the astonishment (EKSTASIS) of the Mind, to Yâ-hwéh Yâhuwshúa`. The combinations of these four constituents (1-4) defines three classes of population, even the hylic (material people), which we have termed “Type C”. These hylics (Type C), are ruled by the néphesh “soul” and belong to darkness – they have body and a néphesh from the darkness. But noetics (mental people), which we have termed “Type B”, who are ruled by the Mind and belong to Trust (“faith”) – they have a body, néphesh, and a mind; yet pneumatics (spiritual people), which we have termed “Type A”, are who are ruled by Thought and belong to Spirit – they have a body, soul, mind and thought). The sum of all of Type A and Type B compose the perfect finite number in the Mind of the Father, A-Z of one overcoming the demon (yisrâ’ë´l). Type A were procreated by the Son, and are known in restored LXX-decoded scriptures as yisrâ’ë´l above . Type B were procreated by Wisdom, currently being two daughters, one she procreated alone, B1, and the other she procreated with sâțâ´n, B2. The Son, Yâhuwshúa`, paid for adopting all of Type B, a broad category including all yisrâ’ë´l outside of Him: middle and underneath , per the descriptions of the vessels of yisrâ’ë´l found in LXX-decoded scriptures. But note that since Type C is not of the number of yisrâ’ë´l at all, they are not reckoned a vessel of yisrâ’ë´l and are hardly found mentioned in LXX-decoded scriptures, except the famous mention in Disclosure (Revelation) 20: 8 of the goats being rounded up to attack the last group of newly-existing ones, in coded speech as the ones not being the mountain (Ğowğ) and not from the mountain (Mâ-ğówğ). The Hebrew word yisrâ’ë´l means one overcoming the demon , those outside have not yet come to exist of yisrâ’ë´l. In terms of the Tree (cross) and the Fruit (Yâhuwshúa`), A regards the Fruit, B1 regards the Tree (cross), and B2 does not regard the Tree (cross). With regards to where one goes when one physically dies, Type A goes to the Light, but Type B goes to sh’ówl (the underworld). The chart below contains the information found in codices describing the characteristics found in each of these groups. It contains what we have noted after learning about these three types of characters in LXX decode d scriptures and the books of Baruch and our personal impressions with identifying their components accordingly with the codices and LXX decoded scriptures. We share the chart because inspired scriptures urge us to "know thy self,"; know how what composes each one, know from where each component came, and identify which kind we are, thus to know where we go after physical death. The codices mention three types of population, but we have identified that a group of deeply lost ones (from B2) are currently mixed in with the Type C to be discarded. To summarize and to further explain the relation of this categorization to the LXX decoded canonical description of the vessels of yisrâ’ë´l: Type A, who is called yisrâ’ë´l in LXX-decoded canonical scriptures, has the Spirit, Mind, and a Néphesh from the Light, and a Material Body and its néphesh from the darkness. Type A is the offspring of Yâhuwshúa` alone. The Envoy functions as the Mind and provides His Spirit (gifted to the ones , not on loan). His Standing makes the uniqueness for type A to be called Spiritual: pneumatics . The dirt-body (with its fiery one) temporary tabernacle carries His néphesh (f.) inside. Type A loves the Most High, their Father. At the Sixth Seal, when everything returns from where it came, Type A drops one component in their composition made by sâțâ´n, the fiery one, which is the flesh’s néphesh (f.) . Type B, who is middle yisrâ’ë´l and yisrâ’ë´l underneath , has a Mind, Néphesh, and Material Body. They are conscious of there being something higher than them, which makes Type B called Mental ones: noetics. Type B is two daughters of Wisdom, so it has two subgroups, B1 and B2. Type B1 is the Middle "Day" offspring of Sophia alone; these love their Mother and do have regard for the tree/cross. Type B2 is the offspring of Sophia and sâțâ´n, so codices say they have a choice of which of these two to prefer and take after, although neither regards the tree/cross. In LXX-decoded canonical scriptures, Middle "Night" yisrâ’ë´l are B2s are not being the darkness, but the sâțâ´nist widow yisrâ’ë´l underneath are B2s currently loving their father sâțâ´n, and striving to emulate their father sâțâ´n by doing away with their B2 Mind (conscience) as much as possible. Type C is not, nor will ever be, any of the finite perfect numbers of yisrâ’ë´l, but they are mentioned in codices and described when pertinent in restored canonical scriptures. The Type C group is merely composed of Material body and Néphesh. They have no conscience of anything but material so they are called Material: hylic. Type C goats are expendable stressors, according to codices, designed for destruction, and also noted in MattithYâ´huw 25:32-33. Type C are the goats, and since the adversary has no regard for the finite perfect number, Type C outnumbers the finite perfect number, meaning it composes over half the earth's population. Moreover, Type C rulers populate the top echelons of the pyramid of the order of this cosmos, which is upside down to make sâțâ´n, the lowest of all, literally the capstone oppressing everyone below him. The terms “above, middle, and underneath” refer to positions in the cosmos of Light, not this one of the darkness. Currently, those ruling authorities of this world are mixed with the B2 sâțâ´nist widow Underneath because they are competing for the adversary's favor. They are those “not being the mountain nor from the mountain” who will be led by the least favored Middle-night B2 ones, who will have been misled by B2 underneath by their “false prophets” when their Great Anger is released after one thousand years of recycling, and these will lead these Type C goats to surround those newly-existing widow B2 underneath, who by then will have come to reject their current father and accept Yâ-hwéh Yâhuwshúa`, and the Middle-night B2 ones will burn these ones with the fire of yisrâ’ë´l. : “Him against the material universe (All the ones entering into the cosmos (material universe), resembling a drop originating from the Light, are sent out/forth among My yisrâ’ë´ l of Sabaoth, “of the hosts” (a demon) in order that the same ones of the Son may be guarded/protected within Him (the Same One)”

  • Cancel Call Forwarding | Yâ-hwéh Yâhuwshúa`

    Should the Most High respond if you call the impostor? False terms forward your call to satan. Here they're explained, why to change. Cancel Call Forwarding: The near-miss false name entries A record of linguistic misdirections, substitutions, and intercepted praise. The information presented here is censored by the establishment. To understand the problem of calling on false names to invoke the Most High, one must first see the broader context of our situation. We are dealing with a precise linguistic interception—a spiritual hostage crisis. Before navigating the entries below, we break down the mechanics of this deception through six vital dimensions: Who , Where , What , How , Why , and Which . Who & Where: The Impostor and the Hostage Dungeon The adversary was misconceived as a competing, inferior, temporary supernatural being—confined to the darkness like a bratty child in a sandbox where it could do no permanent damage. But when this entity discovered its reality—that it was limited, confined, and utterly unacknowledged by the true, real Most High (Who didn’t even grant it a name)—its extreme, undue pride was deeply offended. Victimizing itself, it made an illegitimate legal claim on the hostages it took from its trapped Mother. Filled with sudden, intense envy and hatred for the Most High, its Mother, and all her progeny, it realized a terrifying truth: the hostages were destined to be returned to the Most High, while it, its sandbox, and the darkness itself would be entirely undone. In a desperate bid to keep ALL the hostages it got out of its trapped Mother—not just those it fathered from Her —the adversary constructed an imitation cosmos in the darkness. This entire cosmos is a simulated hostage-dungeon designed to mimic the true realm of Light, expressly built to make the hostages believe they are home and that nothing is missing. Within this fake world he made, the adversary has positioned itself in the place of the Most High. The Problem for satan: The Light is neither hidden nor hindered by the darkness. Anyone can call on and invoke the Most High from anywhere within this realm. To prevent these distress calls from being heard, the hostage-taker systematically changed the names the hostages use, deviating and altering true teachings to point toward itself, fabricating religions, and inhabiting material effigies with its own demons. Why: The Identity Theft & The Energy Economy Why does the adversary do this? The self-pity of a bratty child mutated into a deliberate mission to steal the identity of the Most High—to supplant Him, fool the population into mistaking the counterfeit for their Creator, and create a massive web of confusion so hostages would never desire to return to Him/Home. Why does the adversary need hostages? Because his realm of darkness is unbased, floating surrounded by Light it is outside of and cannot retain, strictly confined in a Way he cannot infiltrate nor ever enter, and it needs a balance of force, Star Wars style, to be stable and not self-destruct. It needs Light that the adversary has none of, and no way to obtain, except by holding hostages from the Light who receive charitable gifts of Light not unlike foreign money transfers being the source of funds for some poor countries. Therefore knowing his realm depends on input from the Light outside, satan would never voluntarily give up his hostages, it had to be a legally obtained determination, to be executed. Thereafter, with no Light input, the darkness and all its lightless content will implode to nothing, as also its misconception will be entirely undone timelessly. Unless the hostage understands the need for freedom, escape, and assistance for this hostage situation, he will believe the lies of the impostor hostage-taker, and may be deceived to believe that it does not matter what name one uses to invoke the Most High, and he will continue believe more lies stating that He is invoked by terms which he doesn’t even know apply to the envious impostor. A good passage to persuade such a deluded person would be to have them read Psalms 44: 20-22 in their KJV, which is clear even ‘as-is’. Still, it is much more profound when restored. That’s why we here will supply the censored information that impostor keeps away from the hostages, the fact that those religious terms provided by the establishment apply to the envious impostor bratty child identity thief, and actually call on that other one, and will serve to call on it when the people will organize to attempt to do distress calls to the Most High soon, in these end-times. What: The Christian Matrix & The Anatomy of Denial Christianity worships a Savior Who came in the flesh, Whose physical body was crucified for their errors, and Who rose again and lives forever. They believe He is the Most High in Person, that salvation is attached to believing on His name, and that He will resurrect them. All of these teachings are true. Yet, while Christianity generally believes they know how to call on the One they worship, they do not. The deceived do not believe they are deceived; they continue being deceived and deceiving others. When confronted with this, the more perseverant individuals rationalize and dismiss their failed attempts to reach Him, unable to accept that they have set up a spiritual “call diversion” system that directs their prayers straight to satan. This inability to change one's mind is not a matter of organic IQ; it happens across the entire intelligence spectrum. Certainly pride halts learning, but that is not the reason every time they cannot change their mind. It is ultimately a spiritual thing which is due to different spiritual compositions among the population (see our classification page ) . Even Mark Twain (who was a deceiver freemason satanist), is quoted as saying “It’s easier to fool people than it is to convince them that they’ve been fooled”. So most Christians cannot accept being told they do not know His true names and the terms they call Him are false, and that means they’ve been fooled to have call-forwarding set up to forward their calls to satan. Lately, non-satanists are slowly awakening to the many ways they’ve been fooled by the satanists who rule this world. They call it “the Great Awakening”—a famous phrase likely coined by the satanists themselves as a voluntary recruitment trap to transfer people directly into satanism. But this particular deprivation of Truth carries potentially catastrophic consequences they have not even considered, including the possibility of losing their salvation, according to their memory that salvation and forgiveness of sins is attached to believing on His name. And the separation apart from their Savior is something they would be very angry about, if they do not know how this is completely accounted for in the plan of the Most High their Savior. Thus, fear causes the denial and anger which characterize their first reactions to being informed of this fact, which, more than other truth revelations, should be done gently, because it is definitely the biggest deception satan has perpetrated on non-satanists. The next thing that happens, according to the known pattern, is bargaining, before those few capable of believing in His Truth show the grief of repentance. Nonetheless anyone sharing this information should be considerate and apply affectionate Love whenever probing whether someone is capacitated to believe in His Truth. The main (and most understandable) strenuous objection that Christians have against this is to claim that the Most High could not possibly desire such a situation to exist, and as such, to suggest that this is so is to accuse the Most High of being too weak to prevent it. But the Most High truly is NOT who willed this situation to exist, He did NOT approve of it, He was not even who caused it to happen. It was a result of the granted freedom of One of His emanations (Wisdom) Who accidentally misused it irresponsibly, but He is Who anticipated it happening, having complete foresight, and He covered everything beforehand to be fully resolved in His plan, which is absolutely on schedule and, regarding this, truly “nothing can stop what’s coming”, and the perfection of His perfect finite number will be fulfilled at the end of the 7000 years that He permits the darkness to continue. As Christians already know, He does not destroy all the darkness just yet so as to not destroy the last ones who are to come out of it. So, indeed, the Most High has never been too weak to stop it, He Self-Generated His Personhood to be capable of separating from His Own Greatness in His foresight to His necessary Work, and He also mourned its happening beforehand with 144,000 tears, so He has taken care of it already, having set in motion all the elements for the total solution of it. But the Christian hostages haven’t even noticed the Matrix resulting from the error – this entire hostage dungeon imitation cosmos in the realm of darkness; that it is not where the Most High intended us to be, nor where He will permit us to stay forever. He is not planning to FIX this place and make us stay away from Him separated apart in this emboxed darkness. No, He wants us fully developed and completed to be enabled to be together with Him in the unlimited limitless Light. And the separation apart from Him must be undone first in order to capacitate ones seeking Him to find Him to be the Witness within, to retain His true names to acknowledge Him when He calls. This is the Anastasis, the Standing in the middle. But in the meantime, we explain here all the various substitutes for Him we have encountered, which refer whoever calls on them to the adversary, what we term as “call-forwarding”. To understand the problem about calling on false names to try to call on the Most High, one needs to see the context of the issue. How: The Mechanism of Interception The sources of the false names are generally two: The various satanists’ nicknames for who they worship, in the languages wherein they infiltrated and misled their Christian congregations, so they can continue to call on who they worship, and still enjoy the trust of Christians who never heard anything differently, or The source can be different religions’ nicknames for demons they worship. When they were converted by Christian missionaries, they were most easily joined when they were told they did not need to change names, the name they used was fine. How the interception operates is mechanical: the establishment provides false terms and titles (none of which qualify as an actual "name," save for Yâ-hwéh) that act as a rerouting switch. The moment these terms are uttered, your calls intended for our Father of the Lights are immediately forwarded to the father of lies. Which: The Rerouted Terms Below is the record of the specific substitutes, false names, and titles we have encountered throughout this realm. These are the terms given by the establishment that actually invoke and call upon the envious impostor bratty child—and will unfortunately serve to call upon it when people attempt to make distress calls to the Most High in these end-times. (Note: Except for Yâ-hwéh, these terms trigger the call-forwarding mechanism). A | B | C | D | E | F | G | H | I | J | K | L | M | N | O| P | Q | R| S | T | U | V| W | X | Y | Z A Aaron (’aharówn) This name, known mostly from being the name of the biological brother of Moshéh, means “I conceived the impregnation”. It appears to be a first-person participle verb form of Strong’s H02032 hërówn which means “conception, pregnancy, physical conception”, which comes from the verb H02029 hârâ´h, which means “to conceive, become pregnant”, although the establishment lexicons deny knowing of its origin, “of uncertain derivation”. They allege it to mean “light bringer” which is the translation of Latin “lucifer”. But satan has no Light since blowing It off in anger (nostrils in Hebrew) into the dirt-image, so Lucifer being is a lie. It is not the same as what the Personhood of the Most High is, the Self-generated One (see the Secret Book of John). It appears that ’aharówn relates to a pregnancy, knowing that the adversary was the misconceived spawn of shame of Wisdom. Apparently, the adversary started a lie to allege he is who conceived his own misconception, because reading the various accounts will illustrate this. So, analyze how “Aaron” can deceive: it means the adversary is claiming credit for the creation of the matrix. No, Wisdom made Her own mistake and will undo it. One can believe the conception refers to that of the daughters of Wisdom, but those npheshóth (“souls”), through Wisdom are of the Most High. The conception was of the idea of the matrix to mature the Seedlings, but what was misbegotten was the mistake being satan, so he is perhaps comparable to a placenta: it gets thrown away after the desired product of the conception is rescued out of the matrix. But when realizing that ’aharówn refers to the adversary and NOT the Self-generated Personhood of the Most High, one can understand why this term is found hidden in code, much more often than the brother of Moshéh is mentioned, wherever theos (demonic-power) appears in the Septuagint LXX. Usually the establishment substitutes “God“ as a “translation” for theos, although according to the code, it should be restored as “the demonic-power of I conceived the impregnation” (satan). Consider, moreover, that the tribe of “Levi” (Lëwíy) which means “joined”, has a priesthood of the order of the ‘sons of ’aharówn (satan)’ which did animal material sacrifices (to appease satanic law) in a material temporary dwelling (tabernacle) and later a permanent material house (temple), all of which are disowned by the living Savior. To understand this shocking information, one must comprehend that the entire setup of the Levitical Aaronic priesthood and Israel being a biological tribe “overcoming God”, and even who they serve who alleged being self-conceived, was all a very bad satanic imitation of the real priesthood of the order of the royals of the correctness (malkëy-tsedeq) to the High Priest Yâhuwshúa`, the King of Correctness (mis-rendered “righteousness”) Who causes His ones to come to exist of One overcoming the demonic-power (yisrâ’ë´l), which does not have anything to do with biology or pregnancies or material sacrifices or stone buildings. These poor token representations in this material world made for satanists to serve satan are just shadowy representations of eternal realities about the organized arrangement (cosmos) of the Light. The satanists know well these facts, using this term to apply to the adversary they worship, knowing Christians will think it is just ‘Old Covenant’ which was from the same one. Abaddon (’avadówn) A term in Hebrew meaning “father of the sovereign“ used by satanists to refer to the adversary’s power as relating to his incarnated manifestation being the impostor sovereign. Its intent is to confuse the reader to think this adversary is the “Father“ of “the Son” Who is the Most High and His Personhood. It is materially seen as the greater luminary orb “sun”, which he adopted as his own star-power, although it is actually a countdown time-measuring system counting down the time left allotted to the darkness to remain. The KJV sometimes translates this as “perdition”, as in the ‘son of perdition’ being the impostor sovereign. The Jews openly referred to who they worship as this in Matt. 12: 24 decoded. Please see the more detailed entry “father of the sovereign“ Abba The Aramaic rendering of Hebrew ’av, “father”. It is nonspecific, thus insufficient to positively identify who the “father” is. “My father” would be ’avíy but different groups have different fathers (See the Composition of the Population page), as our Savior said in John 8: 44 about those whose father is the adversary. Adonay (’adonâ´y) A term in Hebrew meaning “my sovereigns (plural)”. As it is plural, it would refer to demons. Those using this term as a name-substitute often illogically allege the plurality to be ‘out of respect’. The term for a single sovereign is ’adówn, Strong’s H0113 but being nonspecific, is insufficient to positively identify who the sovereign is. Allah Although allegedly in Arabic, when looking in Hebrew, this term can be spelled two ways: עָלָ֖ה `Âlâ´h (Strong’s H5927), which means “he ascended”, or אָלָ֖ה ’Âlâ´h (Strong’s H423), which means “Curse”. The Most High did not originate low to ascend, and He is by no means a curse. Yet in Islam, this term is alleged to refer to the Most High, but in reality, only refers to the adversary, although he never has entered into the Light by ascending nor otherwise. Almighty (pantokrator) In LXX this is Strong’s G3841 pantokrator, which means “upholder of all”, looking at its etymology relating to G2902 kratéw to hold fast and keep carefully and faithfully, not discard. The definitions easiest to find portray the adversary instead, who seizes everyone to get power over them. Most of the instances of “almighty” in the “Old Testament” are simply the demonic-power of aaron (’ël-’aharówn) with the Masoretic “shaddâ´y“ apparently inserted sometime after the LXX was translated. And in some places, the Masoretic “shaddâ´y“ is used to substitute out the true names whose standard replacement terms are found in the LXX. So the KJV which picked the more altered Masoretic for its “Old Testament” is notorious that most of these “Almighties” are not found in any form at all in the original. But the “upholder of all” description of our Savior, the Most High, certainly appears the exact opposite of the adversary being the “capstone” oppressing everyone below him and being held up by everyone beneath. Ariel This term is expanded in the gnostic glossary of this site here. Ariel is a term in Hebrew meaning “the lion of the demonic-power” (’ariy’ë´l) which is found in Yshá`Yâhuw 29, as being part of the spiritual City, though not yet. Note that the ‘four living creatures’ are their spiritual species of yisrâ’ë´l, the first of which is like a lion, and the last of which is winged-creatures “eagle-like”. The last are the highest so the first is the lowest, therefore the lions resemble their father sâţâ´n, being lion-like. The description of the spawn of shame (satan) as seen by Wisdom before her throwing him into the fog was that he looked like a cross between a lion and a snake. These lions thus are the widow yisrâ’ë´l underneath. Take note that satanic institutions like Disney love to name characters by this name. But some may ask, why is this term included? The adversary proudly promotes his spiritual appearance as a lion (or a snake), and distorted one verse in his King Supplanter Version to falsely allege that the LION overcame the Lamb, and base several of religious groups he misled, to worship an image of a lion to be the King, to be the Lamb somehow. They substitute out our Savior for this “Lion of Judah“, of which Judah is a version of the name of Judas, the “Yehuwthâ´h” name satan invented as the name which would open the eyes of Adam, the “forbidden fruit”. Disney the freemason’s satanist institution also made a “Lion King” movie to help this lie, and gave another of its characters the name Ariel. C Christ Is a transliteration of a Greek term meaning ‘anointed one’. In establishment scriptures, the satanists do not know the cascade effect of the salvific work, involving all the ones in His perfect number to become one causing to be existed (come to exist). Warning: It sounds outlandish to those unfamiliar with restored or higher knowledge scriptures: He, the Most High Yahweh, makes three Yahwehs (ones causing to be existed) out of three dirt-men (groups). He caused to exist His 144,000 children first, who are the First ’Âthâ´m. And those are the anointed ones who cause to exist the Many of the nonsatanist middle yisrâ’ë´l, who become the Second ’Âthâ´m. Thereafter those cause to exist the last relatively smaller group which will be the Third ’Âthâ´m. All this has been covered up by the adversary within the canon satan approved for public consumption, by censorship methods also kept covered up from public knowledge, though Christianity’s opponents exploit the resulting confusion and bad translations and contradictions, forcing them to defend altered scriptures. What about its relation to Christians? Acts 11: 26 documents in ’Antióxeia, is when the pupils were first called “Xristianous” (Christians), which is a Greek word which is the closest to translating the meaning of anointed ones. And in verse 30 it mentions pure ones and brothers were there. Knowing these pupils refer to the purified and paired 144,000, the same crowds who had followed our Savior around and were the sons He brought to exist being redeemed by Him after His resurrection, we can see that the 144,000 are still ‘the anointed ones’, and are who were first called “Christians” (anointed ones) being the “primitive church”. Moreover, these 144,000 return during these end-times and are still the anointed ones after the 62 weeks mentioned in Daniel 9: 27-28: a fact currently hidden from Christianity. Is our Savior One anointed too? He is the anointing. He is Who causes and initiates the cascade of everyone becoming one causing to be existed into His freedom/wealth. Definitely, the end of the pruning of those who did not make the 62-week deadline comes from the anointed ones, who cause the Standing in the middle, the end of their death, spiritual and physical. B Bá`al Is a term in Hebrew meaning possessor (like a demon), owner, controller, despot, but the perfect English translation of it is “lord“. Bá`al was not translated to English in the satanist establishment’s bibles since they chose to use the title “LORD“ to substitute out all instances of the name Yâ-hwéh, to in effect have all Christians calling on bá`al in English. Had they translated “baal” to “lord”, Christians would have rejected it and sought the name of Who they want to worship. How can a Christian begin to want to reject calling on ha-bá`al (“the LORD“)? First inform them that their Savior is the KING, and a King is a Sovereign, much higher rank than a mere lord. Look at the “house of lords” in the UK government for example. Do they outrank their “king”? No. There is another confusing factor the KJV did: they mistranslated “Adonay“ also as “Lord“ without all caps, knowing it means “sovereign” not “Lord”. Because of these two terms replacing nearly all the instances of the name Yâ-hwéh, with the same term, many people lose sight of “’adówn” not having the same meaning as bá`al. Yet there still are some stubborn proclaimers of bá`al who searched their scriptures to excuse their continuing to call the Most High a lord even after being told it is a mistake. They often cite these two references in KJV “Old Testament” scripture, which were translated from the Masoretic Text, to allege that Yâ-hwéh Yâhuwshúa` approves of such a title for Himself, but they are translation MISTAKES: In Yshá`Yâhuw ("Isaiah") 54:5, there where the Masoretic Text has bo`aláyikh (one-being-lord-of-you) written, the Septuagint (LXX) has kurios, which is a translation for ’Athon therefore it should be translated "Sovereign", because we consider the Septuagint (LXX) to reflect an earlier less altered scripture (Moreover we know from coding that kurios substitutes out the dual-names Yâ-hwéh Yâhuwshúa`). In YirmYâhuw 31:32 ("Jeremiah"), there is a one letter error in the Masoretic, B-`-L-T-Y is actually B-Ch-L-T-Y and it means "I loathed". Ivriym ("Hebrews") 8:9 and the Septuagint (LXX) and the Peshitta Aramaic Tenákh demonstrate that the Masoretic text has this one-letter mistake here. The `Ivríyth (Hebrew) here was originally Bâchaltíy and not Bâ`áltiy. Barbelo This term, found often in noncanonical inspired scriptures and also included in the gnostic glossary here, and most notably in the Gospel of Judas, is very simply the Aramaic translation of the Greek term “Tetragrammaton“, which means “four-letter word” in English. Isn’t it peculiar that the adversary made “four-letter words” equivalent to “profanity” in English? Before the 17th century, Hebrew was written without vowels, because its rules were known to its speakers, but as it was dying, vowels were added. In the Gospel of Judas, Yehuwdah, who was satan incarnate, told our Savior he knew Who He was, saying that He was from “Barbelo”, refusing to speak His names, being incapable of it. “Four-letter word” is not His name. And keeping it in Greek or Aramaic only mystifies it, the adversary shall never invoke Him nor acknowledge Him. Why is Barbelo found at all anywhere else in ‘gnostic scriptures’? Because the Sanhedrin satanist council determined to censor all teaching and writing of the name of Yâ-hwéh Yâhuwshúa` among mankind, and that was reinforced by the satanist rulers of the Romans after the Bar-Kochba revolt, banning the use of the name under penalty of death. So name substitutes like “Barbelo” got written into the copies to substitute the outlawed censored names, by order of satan through his slaves the satanists, though satan-Judas (Yehuwthâ´h) actually said “Barbelo” in keeping with his censorship of the Most High he envies. D Demiurge This term is codex terminology and can be found here. As with other terms, assess this term etymologically, to understand it better. Demiurge comes from demos, people, and ergo, work as ourgos, worker. The worker of the people works to refine the undeveloped seedlings into developed beings who prefer good and not evil. And seeing it specified in the Tripartite Tractate that the demiurge is used to form people, and is itself also called many of the same terms usable on the Most High, it is apparent that this is the adversary. To understand this, one must be familiar with how Wisdom misconceived the adversary, what Her thought process was, for the good intent of the purpose of developing the future seedlings which are undeveloped, by means of experiencing good and evil. But some err, and by confusing the people-molder who is the punisher as being the Most High, those erring arrive at the wrong conclusions about noncanonical scriptures to think they are satanist. Demon/daimon/daimonos The English word “demon” comes from terms in Greek, daimon and daimonion, which are terms that come from daio meaning “fortune-distributor“, Strong’s G1142 says. 1142. δαίμων daimōn, dah'-ee-mown; from δαίω daio (to distribute fortunes); a dæmon or supernatural spirit (of a bad nature):--devil. 1142. δαίμων daímon; de δαίω daío (distribuir fortunas); demonio o espíritu sobrenatural (de naturaleza mala):—demonio. Ancient Greeks called the spiritual progeny of the adversary which they worshipped by these terms, as they used them to obtain their material fortunes in exchange. When Christians came later, they redefined “demon” to its current meaning. But opposing satanists infiltrating Christianity from its earliest days introduced the Hebrew translation of demon (H1408/H1409) as a substitute term, “God“, to use to refer to the Most High. And other examples of demon being made a good thing is “deity” which is demon Latinized, Mammon in Aramaic, and Providence in English. Referring to Yâ-hwéh Yâhuwshúa` as a fortune-distributor in ANY language is a mistake, resulting in call-forwarding. Despot A Greek term despotes means ‘binding husband’, which is used as a translation of bá`al in Greek scripture translations, and also means “lord“ in English. But English translations avoid translating it as “Lord/LORD“ to English to continue the deception and identity confusion. Dios The Greek term Diós (Διός) is a specific name of Zeus, the principal demon of the Greeks, which by definition is the adversary. The adversary uses many names, and Zeus is historically a big one, which has many names too: “Diós” is only one of those names of Zeus and is found in Acts 14: 13 (see below) in all Greek “New Testament” translations. Here is a picture of an English-Greek interlinear bible copy of this verse:Why do we mention that Diós is a name of Zeus, not directly a name of the adversary? Because the establishment hiding this from all the Spanish-speaking world writes it as Strong’s G2203, Zeus. Yet somehow, it forgets to write Diós into its Strong’s lexicon entry for Zeus:Strong’s #2203 as it appears2203. Ζεύς Zĕus dzyooce; of uncertain affinity; in the oblique cases there is used instead of it a (probably cognate) nameΔίς Dis deece, which is otherwise obsolete; Zeus or Dis (among the Latins, Jupiter or Jove), the supreme deity of the Greeks:— Jupiter. 2203. Ζεύς Zeús; de afín incierto, en casos oblicuos se usa en lugar de esto (prob.) un nombre (cognado)Δίς Dis; que de otra manera es obs.; Zeus o Dis (entre los latinos Júpiter o Jove), suprema deidad de los griegos:—Júpiter. Here is a pasted copy of Acts 14: 13 verse in the Byzantine Majority Text, with Strong’s parsing, with dios in bold font.:13 ο <3588> δε <1161> ιερευς <2409> του <3588> διος <2203> του <3588> οντος <1510> (5752) προ <4253> της <3588> πολεως <4172> αυτων <846> ταυρους <5022> και <2532> στεμματα <4725> επι <1909> τους <3588> πυλωνας <4440> ενεγκας <5342> (5660) συν <4862> τοις <3588> οχλοις <3793> ηθελεν <2309> (5707) θυειν <2380> (5721) Diós is one of the various names recognized as belonging specifically to Zeus, including Día, Diu (Div), and Dis. Those other names ARE found in the G2203 Greek Dictionary entry for Zeus, but Diós is only found in the Strong’s Concordance HIDDEN under diorusso G1358, which means “to penetrate”.Strong’s #13581358. διορύσσω diŏrussō dee-or-oos'-so; from 1223 and 3736; to penetrate burglariously:— break through (up).Διός Diŏs. See 2203.1358. διορύσσω diorússo; de 1223 y 3736; penetrar para robar:—minar.Διός Diós. Véase 2203. “Dios” is falsely being taught as a valid title for Yâ-hwéh, when it is actually a term for the adversary, aka Zeus, and this switch is replacing Him with satan for Spanish-speaking Christians, supposedly as if it were a “translation”. In fact, when Dios does legitimately occur in the Greek NT in the Spanish Reina-Valera 1909 translation of Acts 14: 13, shown here, the term “Diós” is replaced by “Júpiter”, and in the Reina-Valera 1989 translation, “Diós” is replaced by “Zeus”, because THERE, Spanish readers would recognize Dios to be the adversary, Zeus.12 (RVA89) A Bernabé le llamaban Zeus y a Pablo, Hermes, porque era el que llevaba la palabra.12 (IGNT) εκαλουν τε τον μεν {and they called} βαρναβαν {Barnabas} δια τον {ZEUS; } δε {and} παυλον {Paul} ερμην {Hermes,} επειδη {because} αυτος {he} ην {was} ο {the} ηγουμενος του {leader} λογου {in speaking.} 13 (RVA89) Entonces el sacerdote del templo de Zeus, que quedaba a la entrada de la ciudad, llevó toros y guirnaldas delante de las puertas de la ciudad, y juntamente con el pueblo quería ofrecerles sacrificios.13 (IGNT) ο {and} δε {the} ιερευς του {priest} διος {OF ZEUS } του {who} οντος {was} προ της {before} πολεως {city,} αυτων {their} ταυρους {oxen} και {and} στεμματα {garlands} επι {to} τους {the} πυλωνας {gates} ενεγκας {having brought,} συν {with} τοις {the} οχλοις {crowds} ηθελεν {wished} θυειν {to sacrifice.} This intentional cover-up of the material proof of their FRAUD worsens even more due to the deceitfulness of the authors of the Strong’s concordance, because there any truth-seeking Spanish speaker will find that this word “Jupiter” is linked to #2203 Zeus, but nowhere under this entry in the Strong’s dictionary will you find Diós, this other name of Zeus which is written there in that verse. E Ein Sof (’ëyn çowph) This is a Kabbalah Jewish substitute term they desire to seem to refer to the Most High yet it does not, by their Jewish mysticism, which means mistaken overthinking while uninformed by inspired scriptures we accept which they reject. Do not mistake “Ein” with the German number one, this is a Hebrew term ’ëyn which means “there is no…” or often rendered “without”. And Sof is the Hebrew term çowph, Strong’s H05490 meaning “end” or “conclusion” or cessation, related to its verb H05486. It is apparently also related to H0657 ’épheç, which means ceasing, end, finality, cessation (especially of the earth in this realm of darkness). Putting ’ëyn çowph together literally means ‘there is no cessation’. But they turn it into ‘unconcluded’ which is different, so it is more about the adversary who DOES have an end but has not yet ceased, but shows for whom it is they likely have hopes to not cease as planned. So they express it to the public as meaning “eternal”, but there certainly is no lack of better terms for that in Hebrew. Why their confusing explanation? The Jews spin-doctored this ’ëyn çowph which is about the adversary they worship, to pretend to apply it to the Most High they reject, by alleging it to apply to The One BEFORE He Self-Generated His Personhood Which He Himself named Yâ-hwéh Yâhuwshúa`, because no one else had the authority to rename Him nor ever will. And by this moment they specify being before He named Himself, thinking to give Him a name, though being indescribable, uncontainable, and undefinable by language, at that point, though thinking, The One had not started putting into effect His defining Himself or His describing Himself with a name. And they should not seek to redefine the Most High after that point because He had already named Himself. So “unconcluded” is hardly a correct term for “unstarted”. Thus, we conclude their alibi to be false, ’ëyn çowph is the expression of their vain hope for the adversary they worship to never end: “there is no cessation”. A false hope unshared by all nonsatanists, indeed. And this Ein Sof being found mentioned in their tradition of Davening, now becoming more well-known to the nonsatanist Christians, describes the adversary only. The pelvic thrusting motions done by the satanist-jews at the wailing wall of the Roman Fort Antonia fortress is called Davening, wherein satanists emulate the Ein Sof (adversary) having sexual intercourse with their spiritual Mother Wisdom Who is not consorting with them, Who long ago repented in tears from her fall (All the Psalms are the songs of Her repentance). She is Who they call the “Shekinah glory“, and Who in the past they also worshipped as the “Queen of Heaven“. She cannot be worshipped without Her being associated with and adhered to Yâ-hwéh Yâhuwshúa`. The second daughter of Wisdom was with the adversary, which compose who scripture calls night-middle yisrâ’ë´l, and yisrâ’ë´l underneath who are the satanist widow. This error is what their Davening is about, wanting to reunite, reconcile the repented Wisdom with their father satan, a profanity expressed sexually, even to enlarge their numbers. But Mother Wisdom has reconciled and reunited with the Most High Yâ-hwéh Yâhuwshúa`, Who has forgiven Her and restored Her to the point before having made the error. And though She is Who can undo Her error presently, having the ultimate authority over the entire matrix, She will only do so after She, the very last light to exit it, comes out. Then She will be reunited with Her Consort, as Wisdom is the Wife, and being re-Paired, She will be spiritually made Male again, as before Her separation from Him due to the error. Therefore there is no Ein Sof well-wishing, the cessation definitely comes on time for the god of this world, whereas the Eternal One is the Most High Yâ-hwéh Yâhuwshúa`. El This term in Hebrew, ’ël, means demonic-power, exclusively demonic, never from the Light. It is explored and explained in our webpage ’Elohiym is wrong, ’Elohiym is not my Yahweh. The satanist-jews who were trusted by other satanists who employed themselves translating scriptures and making lexicons to define these Hebrew terms, did lie, as they do to their followers, alleging this ’ël to mean ALSO good powers from the Light, even Envoys, maligning them, and redefining terms like yisrâ’ë´l to their own propaganda’s benefit, increasing the confusion they create for satan’s identity theft. For instance, yisrâ’ë´l actually means “one overcoming the demonic-power” in the imperfect tense denoting something not yet completed. Everyone from the perfect number is one of yisrâ’ë´l, as all shall eventually overcome the demonic-power. But few have already done so by coming to exist within the Most High. But their redefining -’ë´l as being a good Envoy turned Ya`aqóv’s struggle against the impostor’s demonic force within him, which he overcame, to an absurd and profane account of the Supplanter physically wrestling against the Envoy of the Most High and overcoming Yâ-hwéh Yâhuwshúa` and forcing Him to bless him and calling him “yisrâ’ë´l”, leading readers to think that Ya`aqóv, which means Supplanter (a term also referring to the impostor adversary), defeated the Most High in wrestling, and that “yisrâ’ë´l” must mean “one overcoming the Most High”, the hope of the most delirious satanists. Not so. El Elyon (’ël `elyówn) As it appears in the Masoretic text, it gets translated into English as “the most high God”. We have exposed here, and on the webpage ’Elohiym is wrong, ’Elohiym is not my Yahweh, that El is a term exclusively for a demonic power, never one from the Light. Elyon `elyówn, (upsistos in Greek) denotes a superlative, “Most High”. Therefore, how can a demonic power be the “most high”? There can be only One Most High, our Father, not anything from the adversary. Therefore, to figure out what scriptures originally said requires investigating in better sources than the Masoretic text, first in the Septuagint whose translation reflects an earlier more intact copy of scriptures. And the results of investigating mentions of “El Elyon” in the Masoretic and all the rest which contain both of these words show a common pattern: The term “El” and “Elyon” are contrasted, and have several omitted words in between separating them, including negations (“not”), which make clear they are two opposing parties. Here are the first three mentions of “El Elyon” found in Masoretic Text scriptures, Genesis 14: 18, 19, and 20, in snippets, restored from LXX, with the words found translated in KJV in bold font. For the full context see the FPS translation: Genesis 14: 18 (restored) – …|the ones (m.) [~middle transitional brothers] not originating from out |of the demonic-power of ’aharón (light-capturer/lucifer) against originating, |not [being] the ones (m.) [~144K] originating from out |of the Most High,… Genesis 14: 19 (restored) – … |but not of the ones (m.) [~middle transitional brothers] |pertaining to the demonic-power of ’aharón (light-capturer/lucifer). Moreover, over |but not of the ones (m.) [~middle transitional brothers], |moreover, [are] the same one(s) [~144K] pertaining to the Most High, |… Genesis 14: 20 (restored) – …|he [~144K] who [is] not of the ones (n.) [~unpaired widow] with regard for |the demonic-power of ’aharón (light-capturer/lucifer) over of the ones (n.) [~unpaired], |[is] not he who of the ones (n.) [~unpaired middle] with regard for |the Most High. … Why would the satanist establishment have altered scriptures in order to put together “the demonic-power of ’aharówn“ and “the Most High”? To make it appear that the adversary is the Most High, because “most high God” is a satanist lie and in keeping with their work to transfer them into satanism. The standard satanist strategy to how to try to convert nonsatanists is to gradually deceive and swindle and render them ineffective by depriving them of truth, because nonsatanists will reject the adversary whenever they finally realize it is the adversary. Yâhuwshúa` said they are trustworthy for it. Elohim This term in Hebrew, ’Elohíym, is the plural form of ’ël, so it means demonic-powers, plural, exclusively demonic, never from the Light. It is explored and explained in our webpage ’Elohiym is wrong, ’Elohiym is not my Yahweh. The satanist-jews who were trusted by other satanists who employed themselves translating scriptures and making lexicons to define these Hebrew terms, did lie, as they do to their followers, alleging this to be ALSO good powers from the Light, even Envoys, but most commonly alleging this plural noun meaning demonic-powers to be a title for the Most High, as if The One were demonic or several (more than two because there are dual-noun forms). They respond to queries about why it is plural, stating that it is “out of respect” that they traditionally speak about Him in a plural sense (see also Adonay). In their Masoretic text, in Bereshith (Genesis) 1: 26, Elohim is prominently displayed as being “us” (plural) who made the dirt-man in their (plural) own image. Those satanist-jews worshipping Elohim (demons) were the same who hid the extracanonical scriptures account of the same event, because the same ’elohíym are satan and 365 demons forming the dirt-image that became the first man in the image satan had seen reflected in the water (Secret book of Yâhuwchânâ´n). And this is confirmed when restoring the canonical scripture: When their KJV Genesis 1: 26 account says: 26 ¶ (AV) And God said, Let us make man in our image, … and… There, 1 Moshéh 1: 26, restoring the content only among those words (in bold), says this: 26 (FPS) …of one overcoming the demon (yisrâ’ë´l) being the one (f.) [~principality (f.)], then concerning the ones (f.) [~daughters of Wisdom] of Me, Yâ-hwéh the King, said he who is not for the advantage of the ones (n.) [~unpaired], the demonic-power of ’aharówn against of the ones (n.) [~unpaired], “Let us [~sâţâ´n and 365 demons] make the ones (f.) [~daughters of Wisdom] being the ones (n.) [~unpaired] continuing to be the ones (n.) [~unpaired], the Union [~true yisrâ’ë´l] of The One (m.), become this other one [~Yehuwthâ´h/sâţâ´n] against the dirt man (’âthâ´m), 40 [~the number of the vanity] of the separation apart, according to the vessel of one overcoming the demon (yisrâ’ë´l) being the ones (n.) [~unpaired], being the image concerning the same one(s) being the ones (n.) [~unpaired] being ours, of one overcoming the demon (yisrâ’ë´l) being the one (f.) [~principality (f.)] [~their depiction of Yâhuwshúa`’s reflection in His 144,000 when water (mobile) (Secret book of Yâhuwchânâ´n)], and… El Shaddai (’ël shaddâ´y) This term combination, famous in the past due to a song (sung by Amy Grant in 1982) written about it promoted by the satanist establishment as a “name” to apply to the Most High, is translated to English in the KJV 11 times as “God Almighty”, 5 times in the Old Testament, and 6 times in the book of Revelation. And ’ël shaddâ´y appears exclusively in the Masoretic Text, which was used by the KJV as its source for the OT. It does not appear in any form in the Greek Septuagint LXX translation; therefore, it does not appear to ever be present at all in ancient Hebrew scriptures, and was added therein after the time of the Septuagint LXX translation. It is an illegitimate insert. The word shaddâ´y probably means ‘burly’, ‘muscular’, if it would derive from H07699, or it would mean “my demons” if it were related to H07700 shëd though the Strong’s Concordance believes it to relate to H07703 shâdád, to mean a devastator, despoiler. Whoever knows the nature of the Most High will recognize that He is all Light without a bit of darkness in Him at all. So, this shaddâ´y term does not describe Him at any moment. But it would certainly describe the adversary, IF it were found in scriptures, which it isn’t. Here is one example just to show you its absence. Words in bold indicate presence in the LXX: Genesis 28: 3 KJV (excerpt) And God Almighty bless thee… Genesis 28: 3 (excerpt restored) – |he who [is] of the ones (n.) [~unpaired] not with regard for |the One (m.) [being] one causing to be existed (Yâ-hwéh), moreover, |[is] the demonic-power of ’aharón (light-capturer/lucifer) against of the ones (n.) [~unpaired] |of the one (m.) [~Envoy sounding the 7th trumpet] who spoke of Me; |the one causing to be existed (Yâ-hwéh) of Me who blesses the ones (f.) [~middle sisters] |[is] of the one (m.) [~true yisrâ’ë´l] [being] the ones (m.) [~144K] [being] you (sing.), |[being] the one (f.) [~principality (f.)] of one overcoming the demon (yisrâ’ë´l). … Note the total absence of any term translatable as ‘almighty’ in the LXX restored excerpt, meaning that it was inserted with evil intent. Doing a word-search for shaddâ´y (H07706) in the KJV will show no such translatable terms present in LXX in the verses in which LXX has theos (G2316) (“God”), which as above restores to ‘demonic-power of ’aharón (“Aaron”)’. The term “Almighty” does have a Greek LXX term, G3841 pantokrator (Upholder of all), which we examine in this list. When examining the KJV instances of “God Almighty”, it shows that whenever this pantokrator occurs in LXX, there is no “theos” associated with it found in the same verse, instead, kurios (H02962) (“Lord”) may be found, which restores to the dual-names ‘Yâ-hwéh Yâhuwshúa`’. Yet in these verses which have kurios and pantokrator found within it, the Masoretic Text has substituted ’ël (H0410) (“El”), to associate “God” with the pantokrator (Upholder of all) which they mistranslate as ‘almighty’, for which they wrongly substituted shaddâ´y (H07706) in the Masoretic Text. There is one exception, however: both theos and pantokrator are found in one verse in the book of Job (`Iyyówv) 33: 4. But compare what has been omitted and altered to try to associate them. The KJV version says “and”, whereas the original says “but”. The two spirits/breaths compared are not the same one. The term ‘brimstone’ found there is theion, which is related to the demonic sulfur smells of a theos (demonic-power). The Masoretic scribes also apparently felt the need to change the last part of the verse to make it something misleading about the adversary, who blew out his last vestige of Light he had from his mother into the dirt-body image. Job 33:4 (AV) The Spirit of God hath made me, and the breath of the Almighty hath given me life. `Iyyówv 33: 4 (restored) – The spirit (n.) of the one [~sâţâ´n] over |the brimstone, the same one [~spirit] of one |not of the One belonging to the ones (n./m.) [~144K], |[is] the one (m./f.) [~spirit] making the ones (f.) [~middle sisters] become this other one [~false yisrâ’ë´l of ’avadówn], |[being] the ones (m.) of the one (m.) [~true yisrâ’ë´l] [being] Me. |The breath (f.) [is] against of the ones (m.), |but the one (m.) [~paired son, First ’Âthâ´m] [being] one causing to be existed (Yâ-hwéh), |originating from out of the Upholder (m.) of all, [is] over |she [~widow underneath], who [is] not of the ones (m.) [~144K], |the foolish boaster (hëylë´l) [~false yisrâ’ë´l of ’avadówn] who teaches that the ones (f.) [~daughters of Wisdom] |of the other one (m.) [~false yisrâ’ë´l of ’avadówn] [are] [being] the ones (m.) [~144K] [being] Me. And what about the New Testament instances of “God Almighty”? They are all found in the book of Revelation. The omitted words change the meanings of the statement in Greek, which is much worse looking at the English words used to “translate” it. “Holy” is one of many HLL terms derived from the Hebrew hëylë´l, which means foolish boaster, and describes the false imitation material-biological “Israel” of sâţâ´n including him. Let’s show here what happened there, in the very worst instance, one quoted in a church hymn which is sadly so very catchy, because once one knows the Truth it becomes irritating to hear it. The words in bold are those which managed to enter the verse in some badly translated form: KJV Revelation 4: 8 (excerpt) “…Holy, holy, holy, Lord God Almighty, …” FPS Disclosure 4: 8 (excerpt) “…The same One Pure (m.) [~Yâ-hwéh (First ’Âthâ´m)] of the ones (n.) [~unpaired volunteers] |[is] the same One Pure (m.) [~Yâ-hwéh (Second ’Âthâ´m)] of the ones (n.) [~unpaired middle] |[is] the same One Pure (m.) [~Yâ-hwéh (Third ’Âthâ´m)] of the ones (n.) [~unpaired widow underneath]! |And Yâhuwshúa` [is] over the One causing to be existed (Yâ-hwéh) of the ones (n.) [~unpaired], |He [is] Who [is] of the ones (n.) [~unpaired] with no regard for |the demonic-power of ’aharón (light-capturer/lucifer) against of the ones (n.) [~unpaired]! |He [~First ’Âthâ´m] Who [is] not of the ones (n.) [~unpaired], [is] with regard for |the existent Man (’Iysh), the Upholder of all, over top of the ones (n.) [~unpaired]. …” F Father of the sovereign Sounding plausible, this nonspecific title, father (’av) Strong’s H01 (of the) sovereign (’adówn) Strong’s H0113 is actually one nearly universally recognized as referring to satan, when it is translated to Hebrew. ’avadówn is famously in the book of Revelation 9: 11 as “Abaddon“, which is transliterated instead of translated in establishment scriptures there. Before it being written there, and since then, ’avadówn was defined by them (Strong’s G3, and H011), mostly as a place of destruction and ruin, ‘Hades’, or an abstract ‘perishing’, ‘destruction’, but only admitting it to be the Destroyer as a secondary definition since this verse, Revelation 9: 11. Apparently their alleging it to derive rather from destruction terms similar to it (H06), not considering “father of the sovereign”, is part of a broad general erasure of ‘satan’ from scriptures in their scribal coding. Probably because of this erasure of satan, the “son of perdition” (John 17: 12, 2 Thess. 2: 3) is not rendered as “son of the father of the sovereign (’avadówn)”, although this is a personification of the adversary, aka the antichrist. The term “perdition” in “son of perdition” is G684. The instances of “Abaddon“ occurring in the Masoretic Text in the establishment OT, are six: Job 26: 6, 28: 22, 31: 12, Psalms 88: 11, Proverbs 15: 11, 27: 20. In every instance they were rendered as per the other establishment meaning in the LXX, which means the deception is ancient. It appears in LXX also as G684, and G622 once. However, the most notable censorship of Abaddon is the fact that Abaddon G3 appears 1,889 times as a word omitted by the scribal code in the Morphologically analyzed LXX, accompanying every instance of mh G3361 (“not/lest”), and when restored, it is apparent it means “father of the sovereign“ and not mere destruction. Fortune (Distributor) “Fortune”, as in distributor, is a term not found in English in your KJV. However, it possibly one of the words found most often in your KJV, but found in languages other than English in your English KJV. Fortune is found in Hebrew, “God“, “god”, and Mammon is how it’s said in Aramaic. The root of the Mammon word is the Aramaic word, מָמוֹנָא, which simply means “material possessions” or “material wealth”. The term also could be used as a name for the abstract concept of personified riches, but there is no evidence of people worshipping a מָמוֹנָא. However, that Aramaic word means Fortune, and the translator from Hebrew to Greek knew that God (Fortune) was indeed being worshipped, and that it would lose its desired meaning if it were translated “demon” (Fortune in Greek). Note that as Yâhuwshúa` spoke in Hebrew to the people, He said Fortune in Hebrew: saying “God”, not “Mammon”. The KJV also avoids going back to the Hebrew to quote it as “God” and translates it as “Mammon”.Are other terms redirecting your calls to the Most High to go to Fortune (the demon)? Fortune is also known as “deity” (from Latin deo), “Deus” (Latin), “Providence”, “Luck”. But the most prominent reference where Fortune and what it is, is found in scripture in Yshá`Yâhuw (“Isaiah”) 65: 11. There is where it is ‘translated’ as “that troop” in the KJV. Here is H1408/H1409 in the Strong’s Concordance citing that Hebrew term Gad/gâd (capitalization does not occur in Hebrew): In the Septuagint LXX, there in Isaiah 65: 11, this term appears as daimoni, Strong’s G1142. 1142. δαίμων daimōn, dah'-ee-mown; from δαίω daio (to distribute fortunes); a dæmon or supernatural spirit (of a bad nature):--devil.1142. δαίμων daímon; de δαίω daío (distribuir fortunas); demonio o espíritu sobrenatural (de naturaleza mala):—demonio. For doubters, simple math will do: if “God“ = “gawd” = G1409 = daimoni = G1142 = daimon = “demon“, then “God“ = “demon“. Imagine how difficult it is for English-speaking people to dissociate themselves from calling the Most High a demon, when learning that God = demon. That term was embedded in them for generations without synonyms and without knowing what it truly means, just like how “Dios” also was inculcated in Spanish speakers without synonyms and without knowing what it truly means. If you find it difficult to learn to reject these nicknames of the adversary forwarding your calls, consider the language that isn’t yours, and how easy it is for you to accept that Fortune is false. Do not allow them to confuse you by accusing you that to reject those call forwarding terms constitutes rejecting the Most High. G Gadariel This term is codex terminology and can be found here. This term is one full nickname which the truly nameless one, the adversary, is given, is Gadariel (gad’ariy’ë´l) which is most often truncated to “God“, and even abbreviated as G in the Masonic symbol, “the Square and Compass”: The term Gadariel is a combination of three Hebrew words: Gad/God (Fortune-distributor), ’Aríy (lion), and ’ë´l (demonic-power). The lion-head in the symbol confirms who this symbol’s G is about: Gadariel. Not any other alleged meaning of “God“, nor much less “geometry”. One should expect lies from satanists, like the Freemasons. The lion Gadariel (demon-lion-demonic-power) specifically refers to the adversary, since the spawn of shame (yaldabaoth, yaldabosheth) was described as half-lion, half serpent in his hideous appearance when first seen by Wisdom. In recent times we all have seen the antichrist, Trump, repeatedly associate himself with a lion-image, since he makes clear he is the image incarnation of the adversary. And it is good to be fully aware that nowhere is the Most High described as a lion in restored scriptures, it is only the adversary who is the lion. The lion is a favorite image of satanists, who put it everyw here in their symbols and even in their names (Ari, Ariel). See “the lion of Judah“. God (gâth) This term is reckoned a title, not a name, by nonsatanist Christians, who for generation after generation, continue using this term to refer to the Most High in English. The Spanish counterpart, which is worth comparing is Dios. “God” is a very ancient term in Hebrew, pronounced exactly the same, and meaning the same adversary ultimately, as also explored in the entry Fortune. For a chosen brother believer, steering him to Strong’s H1408/H1409 is usually sufficient for these to change their minds to realize a change in their working vocabulary is indicated. Even so, it is a delicate operation: see the video “The Problem With God” found on our videos page.Caution must be exercised when attempting to persuade a middle Christian away from this term, especially if they are monolingual, speaking only English. They will seek acceptable synonyms, at least, to brace their house they have built on sand in order to install the new Foundation. Savior, Father, Sovereign, King, and even Yâ-hwéh are insufficient alone to identify Him, and these cannot handle both of His dual-names Yâ-hwéh Yâhuwshúa`. Therefore, if they are not equipped to handle His true names due to their spiritual composition (see the Classification of the Population page), they can stumble badly, and they always fall towards the darkness, never towards the Light. Although one can show them that “God” has translations, what it substitutes for are also direct references to satan, as “the demonic-power of Aaron (’aharówn)“, but much more content than just this term is altered, so simply replacing it with satan will confuse them terribly. Therefore, it is more advisable to encourage Christians to strengthen what they do know true than to replace their foundation, during their life. H Hashem This term you hear frequently from satanist-jews, and whoever believing them that thinks our Savior’s names should be censored and unspoken. Review Acts 4: 17-18 how their satanist council, the Sanhedrin, commanded a world directive against the names of Yâ-hwéh Yâhuwshúa`, that they should not be taught or spoken. It was immediately rejected by His pupils, though it did likely result in their complete genocide by the satanists obeying this directive. In the “Heaven“ entry, it is shown that our Savior, the Most High, has dual-names. The adversary did make a demon he named a single-name “Yahweh“, just to confuse everyone. It is the vanity, it does not “cause anyone to be existed”, though it “causes one to become” of the other one. Apparently, the prohibition against saying the names of Yâ-hwéh Yâhuwshúa` is against the name “Yâhuwshúa`” because eventually the satanists will re-embrace the name “Yâ-hwéh“ to use it on their impostor. But in the meantime, they keep it hidden in various ways: with false name versions, names with vowels redacted, name substitutes, and saying “the name” in its stead. The way one says “the dual-names” in Hebrew is ha-shimáyim. They don’t want to say that, they don’t accept Yâhuwshúa` is Yâ-hwéh. The way one says “the name” for a single name is “ha-shëm”, so in effect, this single-name ha-shëm is referring to the demon made by the adversary, not to the Most High. Heaven (ha-shâmáyim) Here is an ancient sham. It is apparent that the term “heaven” is frequently used in establishment scriptures as a substitute for the names of the Most High. It is even seen in the ancient Greek writings of philosophers. But “heaven” does not merely substitute for His names, it substitutes for “the dual-names”. You see, the Hebrew language has a special dual plural and a regular plural way to modify a noun. The way to make a noun a dual-plural has rules linguistically, depending on the vowel in the singular. The term “name” in Hebrew is “shëm”. The way to make that word a dual-plural is “shimáyim”. This resembles the way they spell “heaven” in Hebrew: “shâmáyim”, which has only one vowel differently. If one retro-engineers that word, to make it a singular noun, it would be the dual of the noun, “sham”. But “sham” is not a word in Hebrew. In fact, Hebrew linguists admit that shâmáyim has the form of a dual-noun, but is “an exception”, saying that it has “no singular version”. It is an obvious lie. They refused to accept that Yâhuwshúa` is Yâ-hwéh, and they tried to cover up the fact that He has dual-names, which was mentioned everywhere, even in scriptures found in jars, but to hide it, they changed one vowel: i to â, and made a sham coverup so nobody would see He has dual-names. Could this be the origin of the word “sham” as a falsehood coverup? When realizing “heaven” was a substitute for “dual-names”, many inspired scriptures anywhere containing “heaven” become clearer in their meanings. See for example, this verse from the Glad Tidings of Phílippos: 37. (33) The Father and the Son names are single, the breath of the Pure One causes to exist the dual-name, for they (The Father and the Son names) exist everywhere: (they exist) above, and (they exist) below, (they come to exist) by means of the concealed name and the revealed name. The breath of the Pure One is in the revelation, it is the hidden One above Who (the dual-name Pure One) exists below, within the one manifested below, Herr The exact German translation of the English term “Lord”, which is the exact translation of the Hebrew term “Bá`al”. See these references. I Immanuel This term Immanuel is one which Christians quite often allege to be the name of our Savior particularly whenever their false name for Him is challenged or around the alleged season of His nativity, which was from a virgin. It comes from Yshá`Yâhuw 7: 14. remember that ’ël means demonic-power, exclusively. Thus that name is not about the Son. Here is the part of the verse, restored with the meanings of its pronouns, containing it: Our Savior predicts that: when the nonsatanists which are currently in association with the satanists come to exist within Him, the satanists who were against a pregnant virgin of the nonsatanists among the 144,000, who was over and against being the satanic state of being continually pregnant, those satanists will call aloud a name that isn’t associated with the 144,000, a name against or concerning satan: ‘The unpaired middle ones being the false Israel of Abaddon are originating from out of the same Israel of the Son, and are against the demonic-power with us (Immanuel)!’ The very shortened version of that verse found in the KJV suggests that the virgin would be who calls His name Immanuel. It is not so, due to the many omitted words changing the meaning when restored. For details see the FPS translation of Yshá`Yâhuw 14: 10-14 on this website. Ineffable name This expression can only be found in the codices, saying “too great or extreme to be expressed or described in words,” talking about the Most High and His characteristics. And it is written that He named Himself, due to no one being higher to name Him. His name does not contain everything about His characteristics, it is a description of one of His functions: One causing to be existed is the meaning of Yâ-hwéh, and Yâ-hwéh is wealth/freedom is the meaning of Yâhuwshúa`. But if this is not understood correctly, one can be vulnerable to be misled to think His name should “not to be uttered.” This lie leads to censoring His name, because of the considering it an “ineffable name”. It answers the question the original name-censors had about how to manipulate people to cooperate with their censorship, to conceal our Savior’s contact information from His people. Scripture does say The One is ineffable. But it does not say that the names He called Himself are ineffable. By introducing this disinformation, this represents a clever evil gimmick to persuade the ignorant to voluntarily never say His names. Oh, it’s “too great or extreme to be expressed or described in words”, which although true about the Most High, does not deny that He named Himself for one to call on Him. So next, the person voluntarily suppressing the urge to ever say His names or write them forgets them in this realm of forgetfulness. Thus, the censorship directive of the satanist council (Sanhedrin) in Acts 4: 17-18 uses this disinformation to excuse using various methods of lying to substitute out the true names of Yâ-hwéh Yâhuwshúa`. Let no one naively expect those establishment translation’s verses to contain the very names they prohibited from teaching. The motive for their strategy is stated in the Glad Tidings of Phílippos verse 13: The authorities wanted to deceive the sons of the dirt-man (’âthâ´m), since they saw that these had kinship with those who are truly good: they removed the name [~Yâhuwshúa`] from those that are good and delivered it to become ones that are not good [~”Jesus”, “Yeshua”, etc.], so that through the names they might deceive them [~those that are good] and bind them to those that are not good. And afterwards, if He has favor on them, He shall cause them to separate from those that are not good so to integrate them among those that are good, these who have acknowledged Him themselves, for they [~the authorities] wanted to take the free man and make him a slave to them forever. J Jah The short form of the written name of the Most High Yâ-hwéh, which is Yâ´hu, was deliberately adulterated by the satanist-jews, in accordance with the satanist-jewish tradition to censor His name, particularly when they first inserted vowel-points into the Aramaic Square Script alphabet during the 17th century. They put in the wrong vowel points into the name Yâ´hu to make it “Yâhh” to truncate it to prevent it from being pronounced through ignorance of its proper pronunciation. It is documented in the Midrash on Psalms (Mid. The. Pss. 68:3, 113:3) that they knew this was a partial incomplete name, so therefore using it did not violate their commandment of men to not say His name. From here, it is seen that this false rendition was rendered in the KJV in the Hebrew transliteration of hal’luw Yâ´hu as “Alleluiah” in Revelation 19: 1-6 (The KJV replaced it in every instance in Psalms with “Praise ye the LORD”), since the Yâ´hu was miswritten yâhh, and the y 6th letter y י was transliterated as an i and this same letter, in the 14th century was extended below the line as j to distinguish it from the small letter L, particularly at the beginning of words. This happened notably in KJV Psalms 68: 4 – “Sing unto God, sing praises to his name: extol him that rideth upon the heavens by his name JAH, and rejoice before him.” So jah came from this chain of errors to be accepted ‘as is’ without any proofreading by certain Christian sects. Hebrew has a reasonable rule that spelling does not critically matter IF the resulting spelling accurately produces the exact same sound. But jah definitely is very different from Yâ´hu. Thus it is not equivalent. Related to this satanist alteration of Yâ´hu, the short form of the name Yâ-hwéh, is their alteration of its form Yâ´huw- with the w 6th letter, which is different. The satanist-jews made a religious linguistic rule stipulating that whenever Yâ´huw- begins a name or word (which they call a “theophoric component”), they must censor the â and replace it with a silence letter “shwa” which is usually omitted in transliterations, or written as a superscript e, or just e. In the name of Yâhuwshúa`, this results in the name they placed in their Strong’s Concordance Lexicon’s Hebrew dictionary, where it appears as “Yehowshua”, which is invalid, pronounced differently, and not equivalent. Another famous example is within the Profession of Yâ-hwéh term, Yâhuwthâ´h, which they alter to “Yehudah” to avoid professing Yâ-hwéh. But another frequent satanist alteration of the same “theophoric component” -Yâ´huw, is when it occurs at the end of a name, where they truncate it just like the short form Yâ´hu, to “-yah”, which is invalid, pronounced differently, and not equivalent. This alteration went through the same alphabet alteration as “Jah”, to “-jah”, in famous KJV false names such as “Elijah”. For more information on this linguistic evolution and its importance see our His names proven study. But another frequent satanist alteration of the same “theophoric component” -Yâ´huw, is when it occurs at the end of a name, where they truncate it just like the short form Yâ´hu, to “-yah”, which is invalid, pronounced differently, and not equivalent. This alteration went through the same alphabet alteration as “Jah”, to “-jah”, in famous KJV false names such as “Elijah”. For more information on this linguistic evolution and its importance see our His names proven study. Jealous god The seven mentions of “jealous God” in the KJV, including one allegation that His name is “Jealous”, are all referring to the adversary. They are Exodus 20:5, 34:14, Deuteronomy 4:24, 5:9, 6:15, Joshua 24:19, and Nahum 1:2. Several non-canonical scriptures document that it was definitely the adversary (ha-satan), the spawn of shame (yaldabaoth), who famously declared in a foolish throe of misled pride: “I am a jealous God and there is no God but me!” (Secret Book of John). Therefore, it was the same adversary who rendered the canonical scriptures cherry-picked by the satanist infiltrator “church fathers”, to falsely allege it was the Most High Who said it. It is important to satan to deny it was himself because this mistake caused the undoing of his old cosmic order (old world order), which divided his house against him so ever since then, he has been working at recovering them as a ‘new world order’. For more details see the scripture reference and its context and far-reaching impact, and the webpage about satan’s divided house. For whoever might want to see one of these seven verses restored to its original content, see this excerpt in question and compare the establishment version with its fully restored original content. For the context, please see it in the FPS translation, it is not found restored in any other translation known to date: KJV (AV) (excerpt only) – Exodus 20: 5 “… for I the LORD thy God am a jealous God, …” FPS (excerpt only, format simplified: pronouns identified in italics, and the words which the KJV included are in bold: – 2 Moshéh 20: 5 “… I am of the one (m.) true yisrâ’ë´l of the ones (f.) middle sisters, for the reason that being the One causing to be existed (Yâ-hwéh), the ones (f.) daughters of Wisdom of the one (n.) Yehuwthâ´h/sâţâ´n I cause to exist, are the Union of Me true yisrâ’ë´l. Although of the ones (n.) against Yâ-hwéh Yâhuwshúa`, he Second ’Âthâ´m is, who of the ones (n.) unpaired middle is without regard for the demonic-power of ’aharón (light-capturer/lucifer) of the ones (n.) unpaired against of the one (m.) 7th Light-glistener, different Envoy of you who spoke, making the ones (n.) unpaired come to exist. The demonic-power of ’aharón (light-capturer/lucifer) against of the ones (n.) unpaired is a zealot against of the ones (n.) unpaired, …” Note, that the KJV renamed “LORD” (Bá`al) the One causing to be existed (Yâ-hwéh) and did not mention Him causing to exist the daughters of Wisdom into His Union. They did not mention those middle sisters who are unpaired and against Him don’t care for “God”, which is what they renamed the demonic-power of Aaron of the unpaired ones against the paired male of you who spoke, making them come to exist. The last sentence says the demonic-power of Aaron against the unpaired ones is a zealot against the unpaired ones. Who is the jealous one? The demonic-power they call “God”. Jehovah This errant rendition of the written name “Yâ-hwéh” is reportedly blamed on Petrus Galatinus in 1518, but this error reportedly occurs in manuscripts as early as the 14th century. It should not be blamed entirely on the gullible who erred by trusting the accuracy of the transcribed Hebrew scripture copies as rendered by the satanist Jewish establishment scribes. It was their father’s tradition to censor the names of the Most High which led them to deliberately write in the wrong vowels into the four-letter rendition of Yâ-hwéh (tetragrammaton), YHWH, in the Aramaic Square Script alphabet, to prevent anyone from pronouncing Yâ-hwéh. The vowels they chose to insert into YHWH instead of the linguistically correct ones, were the vowels found in the substitute terms they use traditionally to replace His written name Yâ-hwéh, depending on the context: either Adonay, or Elohim. See the two variations of their misspellings of Yâ-hwéh: The “Jehovah” term which fooled the gullible was written with the vowels in “Adonay“, but the term with the vowels in “Elohim“ was not noticed. It would have been “Jehovih”. How did they choose which version to write? According to its context. Since the Jewish tradition was to always say “Adonay Elohim”, where their Masoretic would say “Adonay YHWH” they would write YHWH using the Elohim vowels; where their Masoretic would say “YHWH Elohim” they would write YHWH using the Adonay vowels. But what could these artificial ghost words Yehowíh and Yehowâ´h mean, in Hebrew? To where do they forward your calls to the Most High? In your Bibles, the term “WOE” is found in both Greek and Hebrew: Greek Strong’s #3759 ouái is a transliteration of Hebrew Strong’s #01945 hówy or #0188 ’owy. The first-person pronominal suffix in Hebrew is -iy, which could be being added to #01930 how to form Hówy (my woe). This #01930 how also relates to #01929 hâhh, which could be an alternate spelling for Hebrew Strong’s #1943 Howâh, which means “ruin” or “disaster”. And the first letter Y on it resemble a verb conjugation in the third person masculine. These terms we mention here are not verbs, but if they were, they resemble Hebrew Strong’s #1942 Hawâhh which is described to mean to maliciously covet and rush upon to cause to fall/ruin, an engulfing ruin, destruction, calamity; compare #1943 mentioned above. Could our Pure Light Savior be called by such a name meaning all these things? No. Calling to “Jehovah” will definitely get you these things by call-forwarding. Jesus This is a major false name which necessitated an entire webpage to cover sufficiently, the impostor’s name exposed, as well as part of His names proven. See those pages for more details about what is written here. The name ‘Jesus’ appears only in the establishment scriptures’ “New Testament”, as a substitute name for Yâhuwshúa` our Savior, the Personhood of the Most High. Note that Moshéh also renamed his servant Howshë`a (the son of nun) as “Yâhuwshúa`”, and the Epistle of Bar-Nâvíy (“Barnabas”) 12: 8-11 says it was so Israel would heed him. This same name of this servant of Moshéh was Yâhuwshúa`. It appears in the KJV “Old Testament” as “Joshua”, not ‘Jesus’. But there are two times in the “New Testament” canonical scriptures where ‘Joshua’ was mentioned, KJV Acts 7:45, and Hebrews 4:8, but there the KJV reports the name, again, as “Jesus”. The reason why is that Yâhuwshúa` in the “Old Testament” went through the Hebrew censorship of Yâ´huw- to “Yehowshua”, then to the English transliteration evolution to Iehoshua, Ioshua, Joshua, whereas the Yâhuwshúa` in the “New Testament” went through the same Hebrew censorship, followed by the Greek evolution and transliteration to Ihsou, Iesous to then go through Latin Vulgate Iesus, to then go through an English alphabet evolution of the letter i to j as Iesus, Jesus. So the emotionally invested name of our Savior Yâhuwshúa` was replaced by ‘Jesus’ in the King Supplanter Version (KJV), and the less emotionally significant name of Yâhuwshúa` the son of Nun was also replaced by ‘Jesus’ in the New Testament of the KJV, although appearing as ‘Joshua’ in the KJV’s Old Testament. Our Savior’s name would also appear as ‘Joshua’, if it had not been totally erased from those scriptures by the satanist establishment’s scribes. But those unable to profess or accept our Savior’s true names currently, are often surprisingly able to believe the part about the OT ‘Joshua’ being reported as ‘Jesus’ in the NT, though unable to change their profession about our Savior. As ‘Jesus’ is not the name of our Savior in Truth, it is one of two means of calling the beast holding itself to two horns (a horn is a method of calling) in Revelation Chapter 13: 11. The other horn, used by the Jews, is ‘Yeshua’. Jove Though not an often-used substitute for Yâ-hwéh Yâhuwshúa`’s first name of His dual-names, Jove is sometimes heard in oaths as “by Jove”, and it dates back to Roman times, and the establishment considers this a synonym for Zeus, which was the Greek (Hellenistic) name for the adversary (ha-satan), as Zeus was the head demon of the pantheon. The adversary was who persuaded the ancient Romans who took over Greece that Zeus was the same one as the Romans’ Jove, just as Jove relates also to Jupiter, as the history is the same (see the account in the entry Jupiter). Language and alphabets evolve, and transliterations need to keep up to date with its evolution for testimonies of proper names to stay the same. This was evidently also done by the will of the adversary (ha-satan), to keep the true names hidden. The advent of sound recordings was relatively only recently, and before then it was by writings. And it should not be surprising that extracanonical scriptures kept out of the public canon document that it was the adversary (ha-satan) who invented languages and writing, in this realm of darkness and forgetfulness. The realm of Light has no forgetfulness and communication is in the form of Light in song. But here outside, information is recorded in writing in languages, and the many languages and alphabets and the fact all of them evolve over time, all serve the adversary’s purpose to alter and hide the true sound of the names in the Testimony, until sound recordings would be invented. So the current and best rendition of the dual-names of our Savior, the Most High, for English speakers, is Yâ-hwéh Yâhuwshúa`. But in ROMAN times, when they had a more ancient form of the Latin alphabet, THEIR best transliteration for the name “Yâ-hwéh” is IOVE. And two of these ancient letters evolved, here’s how: During the Roman era, the Latin alphabet used V for both consonant (w/v) and vowel (u) sounds. During the medieval period, both rounded U and pointed V forms were used interchangeably, often as stylistic variations of the same letter (allographs). In the late middle ages, scribes often used V at the beginning of words and U in the middle or end, regardless of whether it was a vowel or consonant. This is called ‘positional usage’. And in the 1500’s, Italian printers began using the U for the vowel and the V for the consonant, a change that became standard by the 1700’s. The first recorded distinction of that happened in 1386 in a Gothic alphabet. The French Academy did not fully accept the distinction until 1762. This formal separation of the U and the V did not update when IOVE was rewritten, so it did not update to IOUE, which is more obviously a transliteration for Yâ-hwéh. But to further hide the name Yâ-hwéh, the I in the ancient Roman IOVE was evolved to a modern letter J. This was explained in a famous booklet “the missing J” to show people that the J in “Jesus” was not found at all in the 1611 KJV which was written as "I", to prove that is a mistaken rendition of the name of our Savior, Whose hidden name is Yâhuwshúa`. The letter I was confused with the small letter L, “l”, at the beginning of words requiring its capitalization, so in the 14th century, the letter I was extended below the line at the beginning of words, as a J, which also explains the German pronunciation of that letter as an “I”. Then in the 16th century, the French assigned a different sound to the J i-letter, which matches the soft g sound in “gem”. This evolution of the I was applied to update the ancient Roman term IOVE to JOVE, further distancing it from being a current transliteration for Yâ-hwéh. The fact that both of these transliteration mistakes go in different directions around the same time-period to both hide the true pronunciation of Yâ-hwéh prove that it was by conscious and evil intent, and thus it was the adversary trying to hide it. Jupiter This term “Jupiter” is the English evolution of a Latin term IOU PATER, which is the short form Yâ´hu evolved to a IU, followed by ‘Father’ in Latin, PATER. In ancient times, probably when Rome conquered Greece, the Romans were persuaded that the ‘father Yâ-hwéh’ they knew as IUPaTER was the same adversary the Greeks represented as Zeus. Thus, since then, Jupiter became known as the Roman version of the Greek Zeus. But how would the Ancient Romans have heard about Yâ-hwéh? The Romans have ancient history found in the book of ‘Jasher’, Yâshâ´r, in chapters 59-63 which may have been redacted by the victors writing the history books. In the time period between the book of Genesis and the book of Exodus, the Romans are identified by their ancient name, Kittíy, seen also in Daniel 11: 30 as the sons of Kittim. In chapter 63: 10 – 64: 6, there is the account written of how Tsphów (Zepho) the son of ’Eliypház the son of `Ësâ´w (Esau), who was the king of the Kittíy (Romans), was requested of them (v. 22) to invoke the god of his ancestors Abraham and Isaac, help them in battle, against impossible odds. And he did, and they were saved, for the sake of His name, although it is likely at least the military part was done by the impostor sâţâ´n’s Yahweh demon. Nonetheless, Tsphów forgot Who saved him and the sons of Kittíy (Rome) and the history continues in the Book of ‘Jasher’. Thus the Romans did know the name Yâ-hwéh and they remembered Him as IOU-PATER for a while, till the adversary assumed that identity making those names be considered equivalent to Zeus, the head demon of the Greek pantheon. Every establishment source out there says “Jupiter is how Romans say Zeus”. Judge You may have heard people calling the Most High a Judge, alleging He will judge, or has judged, and hosts a judgment day. Scriptures appearing to be referring to the Most High Yâ-hwéh as judging or being the Judge include several in the KJV: Deuteronomy 32: 36, Judges 11: 27, 1 Samuel 2: 10, 24: 15, Psalms 7: 8, 50: 4, 6, 72: 2, 75: 7 and more… When all of these scriptures are correctly restored and translated, they are in full agreement with the extracanonical (“gnostic”) codices scriptures, in which our Savior clearly states that the adversary and his demons are the punisher(s), which have appointed themselves as the punishers of those they mislead to disobey the Most High or to violate laws of their own making. Scriptures never contradict each other, when they are accurately rendered as per their original content. The fact they do is evidence they are altered. However, they are restorable. Whenever we restore any of these scriptures translated from the coded altered canon, such as KJV, they do not refer to the Most High Yâ-hwéh as judging or being the Judge. But if one reads the establishment’s translation, it indeed clearly appears to accuse Him to be not just a judging Judge, but a randomly condemning judge. None of these accusations are true. For a good example of how the readers are misled by the canon’s altered scriptures, see Psalms 75: 7 and compare it with its FPS translation, Songs 75: 7. And “day of judgment” is a mistranslation. “judgment” is krisis Strong’s G2920, which means a separation of a selection. This coming “judgment” is His separation of the nonsatanist middle yisrâ’ë´l He selected, out from among the satanist widow of yisrâ’ë´l underneath. Our Father does not punish. See who is the “Punisher”. K Kurios/Kurie/Kyrie The term Kurie or “Kyrie” made popular in 1985 RD by Mr. Mister, has its roots in the Greek word kurios, which is often transliterated kyrios, which in English should be translated as “sovereign”, not “lord”. Its Greek use copies the Hebrew term ’adówn (Adon). It was used, systematically according to an established scribal code, in the Septuagint LXX and extant copies of all post-advent scriptures, to substitute out the dual-names of Yâ-hwéh Yâhuwshúa`. L Lion of Judah We are the first to expose this big subject in our social media in 2015 Roman Date, the "lion of Judah" is not our Savior. Our Father Yâ-hwéh Yâhuwshúa`, the Lamb, is our Savior who overcame the lion. Some will say: “Prove it!!” We have gathered the necessary proof to prove it to you in the form of several videos and uploaded it to 144K Productions™ our Youtube channel here. Below is a brief description of this entry, but for an in-depth explanation see our webpage. This symbology widely accepted by Christianity and particularly worshipped by the Rastafarian religion, is based on one single altered and mistranslated verse in the King Supplanter Version (KJV) bible, in its Book of Revelation 5: 5, which reads as though the lion (satan) were the Victor (the Lamb, our Savior). We include verse 4 for context. Read it to compare with the restored verses: 4 (AV) And I wept much, because no man was found worthy to open and to read the book, neither to look thereon. 5 (AV) And one of the elders saith unto me, Weep not: behold, the Lion of the tribe of Juda, the Root of David, hath prevailed to open the book, and to loose the seven seals thereof. But when the original content is restored, the large number of extra words display a meaning very different, consistent with the lion representing the adversary, for starters. See in the FPS full restoration, how the additional content entirely changes its meaning. The name of the KJV “Book of Revelation” in FPS is Disclosure, see Chapter 5: 4-5. Lord People seeking the truth will find different definitions of “lord”, “Lord”, and “LORD” depending on the various contexts of who they ask. Literally for centuries, Christian leaders (which are mostly infiltrated satanists) have told everyone that they “worship the LORD”, that “His name is the LORD”. But different liars having different testimonials is a sure sign of disinformation happening. It should be clear that since the ancient Hebrew alphabets have no capital letters, the later application of capital letters has no manuscript basis to justify any different meanings. Two different Hebrew words and a proper name in Hebrew were “translated” as “lord” but only one is correctly translated. The English correct meaning of “lord” is “owner, controller, possessor, and binding-husband (despot)”. It should be clear that demons which take possession of people’s bodies are lords, as correctly defined. The ‘lord of the flies’ (bá`al-zvúwv) is actually the ‘lord of death’, and thus the Hebrew word which is accurately translated by the English word “lord” is bá`al (baal). This term applies to any demon capable of possessing someone, so it is not a proper noun, not a proper name for the head demon either. Thus and therefore it should not be capitalized as “Baal”. The adversary was never acknowledged by our Father to be given any name, so merely saying baal-worship does not actually specify which demon. But the other Hebrew word which was “translated” as “lord” was incorrectly translated: ’adówn (adon), which means “sovereign”. The Hebrew word “Adonay“ (’adonâ´y) means “my sovereigns” (plural), and is the commonly known term (see link). A sovereign has a very different meaning, of having an inner worth which earns one’s authority to decide and freely make one’s own decisions. That is usually a description for a king. The King is not a lord, a lord being a lower rank, as is still evident in British government which has both ‘titles of nobility’ still in use. The recent surge in the slogan that ‘Christ is King’ should draw attention to the difference in the false disinformation that the Most High would be merely a lord and not the King. A sovereign is not a lord. But ’adówn (adon) has been “translated” as “lord” in the KJV, so many are misled to think it’s a synonym to “lord”. Confusion still prevails among them. But the biggest stretch and blatant lie that happened over 8,000+ times in the KJV’s “Old Testament” alone, is that the generic term “lord” was utilized to erase out and substitute for one of the proper dual-names of our Sovereign King, Yâ-hwéh Yâhuwshúa`, namely “Yâ-hwéh” as misspelled in the Masoretic text (see “Jehovah“). To make it clear to anyone examining this crime (which has victims), the original “Yâ-hwéh Yâhuwshúa`” which was written 8,000+ times just in the books of the “Old Testament” was rendered in the already coded Masoretic text as “YeHoWaH/YeHoWiH“, but the King Supplanter Version (KJV) simply erases that out and substitutes “LORD” (or “GOD“) for it, both words having completely different meanings than Yâ-hwéh, which actually refer to demons. The victimized congregations of Christian churches teaching this supplantation of their King for “the LORD”, whenever their pastors/preachers are asked, will lie to them, saying, “the LORD is the translation of His name,” which should possibly lead to the ridiculous declaration that “The LORD is King”, which would make it clearer that this is another one of the impostor’s usurpations of the identity of our Savior: baal is NOT our King! Lucifer (hëylë´l) This term, believe it or not, is announced, even proclaimed by some satanists as referring to the Most High, so we include it. But in order to prove it refers to the adversary and forwards your calls to the devil, one needs to learn much information not be vulnerable to disinformation. Lucifer means “light-bearer” in Latin, and it occurs exactly once in the establishment bible canon, in Isaiah 14: 12, and the Strong’s Concordance shows that translates the Masoretic Text entry H01966, hëylë´l. It happens to also be the only verse in the establishment bible canon which contains H01966, hëylë´l. The lexicon entries are relevant in their etymological explanation that hëylë´l derives from H01984 hâlál, which besides shining, it also means to praise, boast, or be boastful. In intensive conjugations such as hëylë´l, the lexicon says it thus means “to be (clamorously) foolish; to rave;” so we thus translate this hëylë´l as a noun, a foolish boaster. Consider: would the Most High call the adversary a “light-bearer”? No. The Most High never gave the adversary a name, and never called him. Thus, “Lucifer” should not have a capitalized first letter, it is not a name to be a proper noun. Anyone believing satan carries any true Light is deceived. The establishment however focuses on the shining to point out it can refer to the “day star”, the greater luminary orb, which is quite likely also true, given the multiple solar related words to hëylë´l, prominently including the Greek word helios. The day star we know as the greater luminary orb, radiates false light, not the true Light, and it is the star which misleads the adversary, which our Savior mentioned in the Gospel of Judas. The adversary has misled people to worship that day-star as “the Light”, and thus he and it foolishly boast to be Who they are not: the Light of the world. Without considering the LXX, others assume this hëylë´l must be the “day star” (2Pe 1: 19) phwsphoros G5459, which means Light-bearer, or that it could be the morning star (Re 2: 28, 22: 16), but none of these seem to mean the same as Lucifer in Isaiah 14: 12. Thus much confusion exists. But much more information is available when examining the LXX. The Greek term in Isaiah 14: 12 which was hëylë´l in the Masoretic Text was ewsphoros, which has no Strong’s Lexicon entry because it is not found in the Greek NT. Like phwsphoros, ewsphoros appears to be a compound of two words: G2193 ews, and G5411 phoros, which means a load (as borne). But ews has more depth. G2193 is translated officially as “till/until”, a preposition. But remember the translators of the LXX were satanists, and wished to not communicate the hidden truths in scripture, hiding them in codes and this way: the Hebrew word for ews was H05704 `ad עד. They knew the vowels would remain uncertain to those not understanding, because many words are spelled that way in Hebrew: H05703 eternal, H05704 until, H05707 witness, testimony, evidence, and more, but when finding ews H05704, one must consider it may be saying “eternal one”, or “witness/testimony”, not only “until”. Therefore, the enigmatic ewsphoros appears to be a testimony-bearer. But merely replacing this into the KJV is insufficient for it to make sense, because many more words are missing due to coding: please see the fully restored verse in FPS, where it is made clear the daughters of Wisdom are who fell, but come to exist (originate) from the 144K, although the ones who originate from the 144K are not being the 144K who originate from the dual-names; but the ones against originating remaining unpaired are without regard for the 144,000 Witnesses of the Testimony of His name, the testimony-bearer. Therefore, ewsphoros was not accurately considered by Jerome when the Latin Vulgate translation was being made, because the shorthand coding changed the meaning of the verse, and because the Masoretic scribes had changed the Hebrew word there which had meant ‘witness/testimony-bearer’ to hëylë´l. Jerome likely thought to be ewsphoros to be a misspelling for phwsphoros (light-bearer), so he was misled to trust the hëylë´l (foolish boaster) Masoretic insert, as it is not a possible translation for testimony-bearer, thus hëylë´l was a post-advent alteration because the LXX reflects an earlier more intact Hebrew original. The effect his mistake had was to replace the daughters of Wisdom being who fell, is to revise their satanic narrative about the adversary, to have him be who fell, presumably from out of the Light, though it is clear from many other scriptures satan was never in the Light, But if Jerome knew those scriptures, he should have known better, or he may have been persuaded by the satanist ‘church father’ infiltrators. But believing this “Lucifer” lie is a large reason the satanists follow him, also gentrifying their definition of hëylë´l. The LXX also has numerous omitted references to hëylë´l, found in the coding abbreviated into a mere letter h, similar to how sâţâ´n is found abbreviated into a single Greek letter ς. Assessing from the context of the many instances h hëylë´l is found and restored, it is apparent that hëylë´l, foolish boaster, apparently also refers to the false yisrâ’ë´l of ’avadówn, the “Israel” of the separation apart, which believes themselves outside to be at the top, and exterminates others. This elitism by outliving others they reckon inferior is being a foolish boaster shining the false light, together with their impostor antichrist bearing the false light, “Lucifer”. M Maria Why is this term worshipped by some Christians, particularly among Roman Catholicism? They are misled to think this was the name of the biological mother of the dirt-body which was occupied by our Savior Yâ-hwéh Yâhuwshúa`. But look at the name that one actually had, which was the same as that of the mother of Moshéh, it was Miryâ´m. It was not “Maria”. Where did “Maria” come from? Look at the term used in Aramaic to translate the Hebrew ’adówn (Adon), which means “sovereign”. It is Mara. However, whenever the Aramaic text was substituting Mara for the name Yâ-hwéh in its Aramaic translation, they wrote their own coded form of it, as Marya, which can also be transliterated Maria. Therefore, Maria is the Aramaic substitute term for the name “Yâ-hwéh” for Aramaic translations. Some translators of the Aramaic NT used this knowledge about this secret code to help restore mentions of Yâ-hwéh back into their NT translations. Why did this coding and censorship need to happen? Because of the satanist edict of the satanist council (Sanhedrin) documented in Acts 4: 17-18 prohibiting the teaching the names of our Savior Yâ-hwéh Yâhuwshúa`, which explains its substitution, omission, and alterations everywhere it should be found, even the time-capsule Nag Hammadi scriptures. But it was hidden even before then, by the satanist scribes, since it was omitted from the Septuagint LXX by coding. N Nameless deity The Jews admit they worship the adversary, but have made up many names for it, because it was never called any name by the Most High, because it was never acknowledged by the Father of lights, Who did not consent nor was involved in its misconception alone by Wisdom when She fell. So the irony is not lost: the adversary is truly the nameless one, and his followers mill around like a disturbed anthill working to give it names, forcing everyone on their devices to capitalize the first letters of all their pseudonyms for it. But the Most High, Who plainly named Himself dual-names which have never changed for anybody, His opponents mill around like a disturbed anthill working to erase His dual-names throughout history, forcing everyone to not write it down or teach it, yet they allege Him to be the “nameless deity” if one searches for who it is online. P Punisher Online search says this about the skull that has been adopted by many of the military and other governmental law enforcement: “The Punisher symbol, a stylized skull, represents the Marvel vigilante Frank Castle’s mission of brutal, lethal justice against criminals. It symbolizes fear, strength, and vengeance, often associated with a "take no prisoners" mentality. However, its meaning has expanded to include military and law enforcement solidarity, as well as controversial adoption by political groups.” But it is true that Seal Sniper Chris Kyle wrote in his autobiography about this symbol he adopted and championed, “I’m certain there are people who wear the Punisher without even knowing what it’s about,” and it is true, because we can attest that satan’s definition of “justice” is retribution, vengeance, and punishment, which is completely different from the Most High’s definition of correctness, righteousness (KJV), where He does not punish. He said He does not punish whoever disobeys what He says, but that there is one who does, which is the adversary. Q Queen of Heaven The inspired scriptures left outside the establishment canon (e.g. the Secret Book of John) explain the emanation of Wisdom as one of the twelve Emanations of our Father of lights, Yâ-hwéh Yâhuwshúa` of the dual-names (ha-shimáyim in Hebrew), and Wisdom is called the Wife of the Son, and is described as the only emanation that fell, before she conceived in her mind the daughters which are yisrâ’ë´l outside of Him (referred to below as ‘the host’), for which He paid the Ransom on the cross to save. And before Her fall, He alone conceived His children, the 144,000 of the principality (f.) which did not fall, which originates from out of His dual-names, and know their Way back to Him, because they were not separated from their Envoy-Twin emanations of the Son, whereas the host (army) from the daughters of fallen Wisdom, Who was separated from Him at her fall, are yisrâ’ë´l of the separation apart. Understanding this will help assist in understanding the meaning of the restored text which was rendered as “the Queen of Heaven” in the KJV. Found five times in the KJV book of Jeremiah (7: 18, 44: 17-19), when restored and translated from the Greek LXX (which is known to reflect an earlier more intact scripture than the Masoretic), the isolated mention in 7: 18 appears as, “…and not being the one (f.) [~principality] being over the host (army) and not being the ones (m.) [~144K] originating, are against originating from out of the dual-names (m.)”, then each of the mentions in Chapter 44: 17-19 appears as, “…and not being the one (f.) [~principality] over the Queen [~Wisdom] or being the ones (m.) [~144K] originating, are against originating from out of the dual-names (m.)”. The identification of the pronouns in FPS restored scriptures is done by context, gender, number, and the singular female pronoun “the one (f.)” refers to the principality of the Most High, which in Greek is arche, first mentioned in the canon in Genesis 1: 1 as “beginning” in the KJV. These 144,000 are called the true spiritual tribe of the Profession of Yâ-hwéh (Yâhuwthâ´h), since He calls these by name. Conversely, the principality (f.) of the adversary (satan), who also came as Yehuwthâ´h (“Judas”), the false heart (f.) of the yisrâ’ë´l of ’avadówn (Abaddon), who are not called. This other group is a carnal tribe calling itself a different pronunciation sounding like the name of “Judas”, and although they are a singular feminine pronoun, are not the one (f.) over Wisdom (when She was fallen). Wisdom was restored to Her state at the moment before fallen because of Her repentance, and is ready to undo Her error once every single one of Her daughters is out of the realm of darkness. She, outside of the darkness outside of its time dimension, is restored to Her position and is one of the twelve. But She adheres to the Son in each son’s marriage chamber, and is not to be worshipped alone without Him, as He is The One to worship, and it is an error for yisrâ’ë´l of the separation apart to try to worship Her alone since they cannot retain the Son, and are against originating from His dual-names. S Shekinah (dwelling Presence) This is the mystical (secretive) term in Judaism trying to express the indwelling Presence of Yâ-hwéh Yâhuwshúa` within the 144,000 sons of His principality, particularly visible and manifesting when these are purged of the fiery one, the satan-emanated néphesh of the flesh, after the “allotment to the Pure One” of them by the adversary at the Sixth seal. These purified ones will be pure ones, as our Savior was when He was also incarnated in a dirt-body, and as He also could shine His true Light, these pure ones also will. These 144,000 also did the same after their redemption following His resurrection, and this was depicted as “halos” in early Christian illustrations, as characteristic of “saints”. But both “halo” and “saint” are terms with satanic derivations, and wrong to use. The references to Yâhuwshúa` shining are hidden in the KJV translated as other words (Strong’s #5316), and the Presence also (Strong’s #3952, 4383) which is what “shekinah” translates. This shining does not happen in the ones of yisrâ’ë´l outside, still of the separation apart (e.g. FPS 1 Thess. 5: 3). The adversary’s “allotment to the Pure One” (our Savior) is the adversary “conceding” that the 144,000 are His, but the mistaken side of it, at the Sixth Seal opening, is when the adversary, posing as the false “Yâ-hwéh”, takes possession of the dirt-bodies of pruned middle nonsatanists, who by then still won’t have come to exist within the Most High (as per their inability due to their spiritual composition at the time). This misled appropriation of who do not belong to him, merely due to owning their material bodies, is what the adversary calls the “`âzaz’ë´l” (to strengthen the demonic-power). But Yâ-hwéh Yâhuwshúa` has no regard for the adversary and these concepts are detestable to Him, the pruning from His anointing which happens at that time has a purpose for the Ransom from spiritual death to be applied. The adversary’s false “Yâ-hwéh” hates those middle nonsatanists he takes over, and dismisses them into the underworld into another captivity, from which they are freed and resurrect by the true Yâ-hwéh within the 144,000. This is the sign described in Revelation 1: 1 (when restored). Son/son/sun In 2017 RD, we made an earnest effort to uncover the hidden meaning behind the use of the homonym "sun" and its association with directing mankind's worship away from the Most High. We shared our findings on our YouTube channel, where the video remains available today. You can view it at the following link. From the earliest times in history, the adversary has caused the gullible to worship the greater luminary orb with its false material light, even back to Adam. The adversary uses it as his ‘star’, and it is accessible to his demons, and there are even unaltered videos of UFOs entering therein. Thus the adversary pretends it is his version of “the father”, and his person is “the son” in his impostor scheme. This would be “Abaddon”, but nonetheless also thrives on a cheap dirty trick of having it be called, in not just English, a homonym of “the Son”: “the sun”. And many religious terms in many languages are solar, especially since the Eastern Roman Emperor Constantine combined solar worship with Christianity, which was a political move to strengthen his dying empire with a unified state religion, flooding Christianity with paganism. We have heard reports of the adversary personally attending higher Freemasonry meetings, where he has his followers address him as “the son”. This term is just a nonspecific term so one cannot use it alone to positively identify our Savior, since capitalization is not verbally audible. One should also note that in restored scriptures, the adversary is sometimes referred to as ‘the son among the ones (m.) within yisrâ’ë´l’, since he is among us but not of us. The adversary was a misconceived bastard son of Wisdom, without the participation nor consent of our Father. But he blew out the only vestige of Light he ever did have from his Mother, into the dirt-man image, to make it become a living néphesh (“soul”). Sovereign It should be clear from 1 Corinthians 8: 5 that there are many sovereigns, therefore one should never rely on invoking a simple title as being sufficient to make a positive identification of our Savior. A sovereign is one having the supremacy to have the self-earned power to make decisions. The description is fitting to a King or royalty. But even the ruler of this false cosmos in the realm of darkness is called the prince of darkness, and that one is the sovereign ’adówn (adon) referred to in the term ’avadówn (Abaddon). So if ever one might apply this general term to our Savior, include both His dual-names also, to not have call-forwarding to the sovereign adversary. And avoid using the Hebrew term unless you are speaking only in the Hebrew language, because communication is to speak to listeners in their languages, and to be unifying and not divisive. T Tetragrammaton This is a Greek term meaning “four-letter word”. It refers to the four letters used in Ancient Hebrew, before the vowels were written into that language, to spell the first name of the dual-names of our Savior Yâ-hwéh Yâhuwshúa`. The name Yâ-hwéh was spelled with Hebrew letters transcribed as YHWH. Before the division of languages at the Tower of Babel (Bâvél), there were no vowels written because people knew the linguistic rules of the vowel sounds, so they were not written. But when Hebrew was in danger of extinction as a language, the Jews wrote in the vowels in new symbols inserting them into Hebrew written in the Aramaic Square Script alphabet. But our Latin alphabet uses vowels, so YHWH is not pronounceable as transcribed from a vowel-less ancient alphabet. This confuses some to think it’s ineffable, or that it is not meant to have any vowels, but it is easy to determine which vowels go in it linguistically from the rules already written, when knowing the proper pronunciation of the ancient letters, not the “modern Hebrew” version. As such, “tetragrammaton” is merely a Greek description of the writing of His first written name, without the hidden name Yâhuwshúa`. It is not a substitution worth anything. Moreover, “barbelo” is the Aramaic version of “four-letter word”, and it was used by Judas in the “Gospel of Judas” by him, satan’s incarnation, when he stated he did know Who Yâhuwshúa` was/is. But his unwillingness and inability to acknowledge Him, ever, is why the adversary will never enter the Light. Theos This Greek term is the correct translation for ’ël (El) which means an exclusively demonic-power, in Hebrew. Because of scribal coding omissions, it was redefined by the adversary’s establishment as also meaning good powers, but that is part of satan’s disinformation. The term theos etymologically derives from the term for sulfur, since demons smell of sulfur (see Greek Strong’s G2303 and G2306 and the resemblances between all the theos terms relating to them). Thus redefined, it was extensively deployed into the religious terms used by Christianity, in every term with a prefix “theo-”. For more information see our webpage elohíym is wrong: ’elohíym is not my Yâ-hwéh. Y Yah This term is a truncated false rendition of the short form of the name Yâ-hwéh, which is Yâ´hu or its prefix form Yâhuw-. This “Yah” false name is an altered false version approved by Judaism which censors His true names (Midrash on Psalms (Mid. Teh. Pss. 68:3, 113:3)), because it is a false name, and the full explanation is found in our name study, His names proven. Yahshua This term is incompatible with every written form of the name of Yâhuwshúa` because it takes absolutely no account for the sixth Hebrew letter waw in it (W) which is found in the form of a shuwrëq (UW) in every single written instance of this name in Hebrew scriptures, which appear as “Joshua” in the KJV. The history of it reportedly is that during the 1960s, certain groups wanted to revive using our Savior’s true name, but evidently, seeing the YHW at the end of names being falsely rendered as “-jah” in the KJV, or the “Jah” of hal’luw Yâ´hu in as it appears in the KJV, they were misled to use this mistaken form as a prefix, even though the name of Yâhuwshúa` always has the shuwrëq (UW). The adversary did anticipate the reemergence of the true name Testimony in these end-times by the return of the sons who remember His true name, and preempted it with a slew of false versions we call “near-miss names” to produce groups with legalistic bad fruits, because they resemble the Truth but nonetheless miss the mark. Yahuah/Yahuwah When probably good-intentioned people with inadequate information sources shallowly investigated His names, seeking to clear what is wrong with the establishment terms, they came up with mistakes such as this term. The flawed method these used to determine their version, is merely taking the term Yâhuwthâ´h, which they see rendered as Yahuwdah, because it is spelled YHWDH, and they noted without the D it would be the same as the tetragrammaton so they subtracted the D to make this term. They also did not see the ending -eh as having a basis in Hebrew, not having studied it, and falsely accused it of “being feminine”. It is documented and explained and debunked in our name study, His names proven. Yahuweh When probably good-intentioned people with inadequate information sources shallowly investigated His names, seeking to clear what is wrong with the establishment terms, they came up with mistakes such as this term. The flawed method these used to determine their version, is assume that “Yahweh” is mistaken, not knowing the reason the “hw” syllable is shortened to a silence, and expanding it as in the short form of Yâ-hwéh in the Yâ´huw- prefix. It is not linguistically accurate. It is documented and explained in our name study, His names proven. Yahweh Yâ-hwéh is called the written name, the first of the dual-names Yâ-hwéh Yâhuwshúa`. The adversary, through his satanist scribes who did the coding according to satan, only wrote the single name YHWH (YeHoWaH/YeHoWiH) in their Masoretic Text (which is Hebrew scripture coded into shorthand code) whenever the original had said both dual-names Yâ-hwéh Yâhuwshúa`. And into their Septuagint (LXX) translation to Greek they wrote Kurios instead of YHWH wherever the original said Yâ-hwéh Yâhuwshúa`. But that apparently was not enough. For all those single-name mentions of YHWH in the Hebrew Masoretic text, the English King Supplanter Version (KJV) itself also substituted the supplanter (bá`al/lord) for the King wherever His dual-names had been present in the original, over 8,000 times. But we know that this merely means there were over 8,000 times the dual-names Yâ-hwéh Yâhuwshúa` was mentioned. For whoever demands to see our originals, the original content is ascertained by one understanding the message decoding and restoring the translation. Accurate copies of faithfully coded transcriptions are publicly available. Since all 8000+ times Yâ-hwéh was omitted from the KJV were actually DUAL-name instances of Yâ-hwéh Yâhuwshúa`, what about the times where “Yâ-hwéh” was mentioned alone in the original? ALL of those times Yâ-hwéh was mentioned alone were ERASED by the coding method. You can find where it was in the Codes.doc in the FPS download as the Strong’s number code 2962 (kurios) or kurion. All were omitted from coded Analytic LXX. Therefore “YHWH” (Yâ-hwéh) has been omitted FAR MORE times than 8,000! But why were ALL the single-name mentions of Yâ-hwéh omitted? Because there are TWO different Yâ-hwéhs, One is our Father the true Yâ-hwéh, and the other is not even one of us, being the false ya-hwéh, which is a demon that satan created and named it that single-name, which whichever nonsatanist discovers it usually stumbles completely, not knowing there are TWO, and throws out the name ENTIRELY because he learns just how BAD this demon is. You may even have met some of these, who busy themselves pointing out all the historical negative things which that ya-hwéh has done. So, how can one usually distinguish which is Which when decoding? By means of context, but most often because the TRUE Yâ-hwéh is described as ‘the Yâ-hwéh of Me’ (and it is Him dictating the scripture), whereas the FALSE Yâ-hwéh is described as ‘the Yâ-hwéh of the one (m.)’ but using a Hebraism that says that ‘when there is more than one, the other “one” is translatable as “other one” because it’s implied’. So, we often write in that instance, the standardized linguistically correct ‘the Yâ-hwéh of the other one (m.)’, wherein the other one (m.) is, as we have found, of ’avadówn (“Abaddon”). But there is even more we found, which needs to be shared in view of the fact that the satanists mislead others to mispronounce things. A long time ago perhaps around 2004 or so, I personally was in communication online with a very prominent Hebrew linguist, Anson F. Rainey, in the state of Israel, and discussed with him his knowledge about the linguistics of Yahweh, and even of Yahuwshua (although he did not have our beliefs because he had converted to Judaism from having been raised Christian). He described Yahweh as being a verb which he believed was a Hiphiyl conjugation. Then, he explained to me what vowels would be used in a Hiphiyl conjugation of the verb, which would use a patach short “a” which is NOT how we have published Yâ-hwéh always, before or after that, because we had and have come to the definite conclusion that the first vowel in Yâ-hwéh is a qamets â, which sounds like a short ŏ in English. But when he told us this, we experimented with this name he described, which would be transliterated, using our method consistent with the Strong’s Lexicon, as “Ya-hwéh” instead of Yâ-hwéh, but we immediately noticed a silence with no inspiration, which stopped when we switched back. It was then that we researched which were the vowels that are used according to the particular verb conjugation type, which appears in our name study, His names proven, copied from the Gesenius Hebrew Grammar appendix. The vowels we were using for Yâ-hwéh, which acknowledged Him, were found to be exactly as per those found in the Hophal conjugation, giving us a new understanding of the meaning of His written name, and linguistic basis for the qamets â being in there. Notice that the MEANING of a Hiphiyl “Ya-hwéh” is also DIFFERENT than the HOPHAL conjugation we have been proclaiming. The false Hiphiyl “Ya-hwéh” means “He causes to become” and would have been transliterated IAUE for the Romans instead of IOUE, which did not happen. The true Hophal Yâ-hwéh means “He causes to be existed”, and goes consistent with the ancient Roman transliteration of IOUE (both Hiphiyl and Hophal are causative but Hophal is passive, -be existed) So look at how this meaning fits the way it is found in decoded scripture: The “Yahweh” of the one .... becomes .... The one causing to become of the other one (the thing, the adversary, that is not even one of us at all) The Yahweh of Me .... becomes .... The one causing to be existed of Me (which also implies even the unpaired are of Him) So thus it is likely that when satan’s false Yahweh singular ha-shëm adopts that name, you may be hearing “Ya-hwéh” with a short patach “a” as Anson Rainey was saying. They will get no clue from their writing “Yahweh” that their pronunciation is mistaken, nor be made aware that there is a second, hidden name in His dual-names. Nonetheless, we will continue professing the Most High, saying and writing and pronouncing Yâ-hwéh Yâhuwshúa` with the qamets “â” which sounds like a short ŏ in its first of two dual-names, which is “ha-shimáyim”, a good response to whoever might tell you “hashem” in Hebrew. But the confusion (aka Babylon) is made worse by satan having made a demon and named it “Ya-hwéh”, and erasing single-name mentions and making dual-name mentions single, and since satan also erased mentions of himself (2,031 coded as “S”, sâţâ´n 1,889 as <3> ’avadówn, and h hëylë´l 1,946 times) quite frequently the Bible reader will not know that it was satan speaking certain quotes. The false single-name Ya-hwéh is thus the basis of the confusion created by satan. Yeshua Some say, not knowing the spelling of this term, that it is a Hebrew word meaning “He saves”. It is not, though it does sound like it. The word that DOES mean “He saves” is found several places in the “Old Testament” scriptures, and examining the context, it is apparently referring to the antichrist, NOT to our Savior. But this “Yeshua” is spelled Y-Sh-uW. This three-letter word is actually an acronym for “Yemach Shemow Wzikhrow”, which in Hebrew means “May His name and memory be erased”. Why would it mean such a thing? Who would do such a thing? There was a rabbinic anti-Christian document, called the “Tales of Yeshu” (Toldoth Yeshu) dating back to 400 CE, which had plagiarized the Glad Tidings of MattithYâ´huw, and added lies and scorn, accusations and mockery. According to the “Tales of Yeshu” (Toldoth Yeshu), the original name of our Savior was Yâhuwshúa`, but when He “became a heretic/lunatic”, His name was changed to Yeshu, this acronym YSW So this acronym passing itself off as “He saves” is the term most often adopted by Jews to supposedly refer to Yâhuwshúa`, but with the hidden agenda to help erase His name and memory. As ‘Yeshua’ is not the name of our Savior in Truth, it is one of two means of calling the beast holding itself to two horns (a horn is a method of calling) in Revelation Chapter 13: 11. The other horn, used by the non-Jews, is ‘Jesus’. YHVH Some people make reference to the Most High by writing these letters, without attempting to pronounce them or assign any vowels to it. The four letters attempt to transcribe those used in Ancient Hebrew, before the vowels were written into that language, to spell the first name of the dual-names of our Savior Yâ-hwéh Yâhuwshúa`. The name Yâ-hwéh was spelled with Hebrew letters which would be correctly transcribed as YHWH. But this is correct according to the Ancient Hebrew original pronunciation of the letters. But the problems are several when people do not know the proper pronunciation of the ancient letters, and trust in the “modern Hebrew” version. The sixth Hebrew letter originally was a W, and it can appear as a W or an oW or a uW. But the Jewish speakers of Hebrew changed the pronunciation of several letters in their alphabet in their “modern Hebrew”, and the 6th Hebrew letter adopted a different sound, that of an English V, probably because the German W has that sound. Therefore, if you see someone write YHVH, then you understand why it is mistaken: they applied “modern Hebrew” Ashkenazi mistakes to their transliteration of ancient Hebrew letters. YHWH See the Tetragrammaton and Barbelo. Z Zeus Strong’s lexicon entry for Zeus: The next term, G2204 resembling it suggests that Zeus would mean ‘glower’. But seeing as Zeus is the head demon of the Greek pantheon, Zeus is the adversary, and if he can glow, it would just be to deceive others. The main false alternative name of Zeus being used everywhere by Spanish speakers thinking to address the Most High, is Dios. They get call forwarding. Another alleged synonym for Zeus mentioned here, in the Strong’s entry, is “Jove”, which in Roman Latin would have been IOVE, which is IOUE, and this is most certainly a transliteration of Yâ-hwéh. See the entry for Jove. BACK TO TOP YÂHUWSHÚA is YÂ-HWÉH ` Accept NO Substitutes! A B C E D F G H I J K L M N P Q S T Y Z

  • The Invitation of the Most High | Yâ-hwéh Yâhuwshúa`

    The Most High is inviting All You non-satinists to leave them behind! But are you one of His 144K helpers? Find out His plan for you here. THE INVITATION OF THE MOST HIGH The Majority Will Accept His Invitation The majority coming to exist will accept His invitation upon resurrecting. The chosen few already existing will be activated by His invitation. Which are you? If you are here, there are no coincidences. Is this because the Most High is inviting you? Or are you one of His chosen few? Thus, they shall be the Profession of Yâ-hwéh ( Yâhuwthâ´h) , the ones (m.) not the last-ones (m.) in temporal succession, the first in rank of one overcoming the demon (yisrâ’ë´l) , so the ones (m.) not the first-ones (m.) in temporal succession [ are ] the last-ones ( m .) in rank. For this reason, the Many ones ( m .) of Yâ-hwéh who (pl.) come to exist, the middle , [ are ] ones-invited (m.), but the few (m.) to drink of Yâ-hwéh [ are ] the ones-chosen ( m. ) .” - MattithYâ´huw 20: 16 Wisdom is cautious. Examine the circumstances of your being here. If you are here seeking Him, you will find Him as He said. If not, you will not, though we have. With His guidance, apply caution to verify everything you find along your path to find Him. Falsehoods are dead-ends though they may run parallel to the authentic Way. And one could attempt to verify every single doctrine taught, but the problem lies in the fact that, how can that one know what is true, not having His guidance? That is why one can take the shortcut to scripturally-guaranteed verification by verifying one straightforward thing: whether the sources you are considering trusting have, or do not have His actual names. According to inspired scriptures, anything coming from someone who doesn’t have His real names is not reliable for absolute trust. Therefore, the first step in vetting your sources for information is seeing if they know His actual names. If not, the source is unreliable, though they may have some truth in their parallel detour ways. Besides for the purpose of verifying your path, having His names correct is the beginning of one’s proper walk on The Way of Yâ-hwéh Yâhuwshúa` , to find yourself on His true Rock. Acknowledging Him is the key to the treasures of Wisdom and Knowledge which follow after accepting His Word of The Way . (Colossians 2: 2-3) That explains the first purpose of the YahwehYahuwshua.org website being, to teach the chosen few the true dual-names of the Most High, which are Yâ-hwéh Yâhuwshúa`: And to prove them to you beyond any doubt or question we have ever encountered; because after that, it lets the ones who profess Him accurately learn all the relevant truth, so that we can help them learn more, undoing the disinformation brainwash through lies and deception done by the ruler of this world, the adversary. Anyone having come here must by now have been through the “great awakening” of this world, to wake up to the revelation that this world is indeed ruled by sâţâ´n and his followers, as well as waking the non-sâţâ´nists’ great anger at their inability to change that. Anger happens when one thinks one’s rights and authority are being violated. Non-sâţâ´nists were deceived to think non-sâţâ´nists rule this world, and now these see that all those ruling in every department are sâţâ´nists, who now have come out of the closet. They think to correct this world, but get angry that nothing happens. This anger is not shared by the ones within Him because these understand that sâţâ´n is who made this world and he is its god and rules it with his followers, so we do not expect them to honor us with rights to decide or to honor our preferences about this world. They were only pretending to be non-sâţâ´nists, to be accepted as their leaders. Now the sâţâ´nists want to finish fully corrupting non-sâţâ´nists. And the non-sâţâ´nists refusal to accept their authority is the cause of the Great Anger of yisrâ’ë´l, which comes from sâţâ´n, who hopes to make it SO huge, they may lose their peace and do sâţâ´nist things like violence. 80. Yâhuwshúa` said, “Whoever has come to understand the world has discovered a carcass, and whoever has discovered the carcass, the world is not worthy of that man.” So, the ones within Him overcome the adversary by means of His true names, but the non-sâţâ´nists overcome the adversary by refusing his authority over them to the death. But if you are one of His chosen ones, hearing His voice will activate you to acknowledge Him, overcome this world, and come to exist as one overcoming the demon – the meaning of yisrâ’ë´l. At this point, examine yourself for the answer to that age-old question within you: could you be chosen? Consider: Are you interested in finding out whether this is true about overcoming sâţâ´n, and in helping others? Or are you being moved to leave? Signs can point out which is the answer. Speaking plainly, without citing all the references, these are signs: if you are one chosen, you will love the sound of His names and the fragrance of the knowledge of the Anointed One, and you will be able to learn both of His dual-names, Yâ-hwéh Yâhuwshúa`, and retain them, and even more, feel compelled to use them and to stop using false names for Him. And you will also hunger to learn more truth and understand, even though the world be against you. Therefore, we forward you His invitation, whether you are one of the ones chosen, or one of the middle. But why should one just invited, “the middle”, not being the chosen few, desire to know these things anyhow, if we all also know that the salvation of all non-sâţâ´nists is just around the corner, for those not falling into sâţâ´nism by worshipping the impostor (who is sâţâ´n)? This is also important. Why do you say the Most High has "dual-names"? The Secret Book (Apocrypha) of Yâhuwchânâ´n (“John”) says: “...Each has its own realm modeled on one of the higher realms. And each new name refers to a glory in the heavens So that Yaldabaoth’s demons might be destroyed. The demons’ own names, given by Yaldabaoth, are mighty names, but the powers’ names reflecting the glory above will bring about the demons’ destruction and remove their power. That is why each has two names . Yaldabaoth modeled his creation on the pattern of the original realms above him so that it might be just like the indestructible realms. [Not that he had ever seen the indestructible ones. Rather, the power in him, deriving from his mother, made him aware of the pattern of the cosmos above.]” -Author: Stevan Davies, (2005), “The Secret Book of John” for the Nag Hammadi Library (disclaimer : we do not capitalize power in this context or 'yaldabaoth' which refers to demons) The scripture above is why the Most High has two names. Scriptures, decoded, calls these the dual-names (in Hebrew, ha-shimáyim), which means precisely “the dual-names,” but was altered by sâţâ´nic scribes hiding this into “ha-shâmáyim,” a dual-form which has no linguistic basis for a single form, and which they translate as “the heavens” everywhere in their scripture translations, to substitute for the mention of the existence of dual-names, and conceal the fact. This is the question: Why should we offer this ‘higher knowledge’ (gnosis) to everybody non-sâţâ´nist, if according to scriptures, while biologically living, the middle: non-sâţâ´nists and Christians (not being these 144,000), are not capable of accepting and switching to His actual names, to become these 144,000 chosen ones? Yâhuwshúa` spoke to the masses in parables because they could not handle the higher knowledge that He communicated privately to His twelve pupils, referred to as ‘gnosis.' And this world’s sâţâ´nists made an “establishment church” to control the Christians, and reckoned correctly that if they allowed the higher knowledge among the Many, who are the middle non-sâţâ´nists, they would be unable to handle it, like those masses handling only parables. Therefore, they were allowed to ‘dumb it down’ because they preferred to have a vast, powerful constituency over teaching the Truth. Conflict of interest, but they were closet satanists , as are the authorities of this world because sâţâ´n rules this world, and his priority was to prevent anyone from overcoming himself, so his first list of things to do to ‘dumb it down’ was to remove His name from the memory of the world. Irenaeus, one of the so-called “church fathers,” was utterly opposed to any “higher knowledge” or higher ranks among believers, objecting even to the idea that our Savior spoke privately to His pupils. Irenaeus was a sâţâ´nist. Having higher authority than him or other sâţâ´nists, we rename him “Erroneous.” Though being so-called Christians in the eyes of this world, they enforced the sâtâ´nic-jewish order in Acts 4: 17 prohibiting the teaching of the name of Yâhuwshúa`. And this is why you haven’t heard the name of Yâ-hwéh Yâhuwshúa` being taught in any Christian church. It was meant to be preserved by His chosen ones and to be introduced to the middle when the right moment comes that the ‘middle’ can hear and learn it when freed from the spiritual impediments and carnal handicaps. But can’t everyone believe in His proper names now ? Although every single one, A-Z, of the finite perfect number in the Mind of our Father, shall believe in His true dual-name testimony at the End, there are apparent specific times which are predicted for when each vessel (category) of yisrâ’ë´l comes to exist, believing and professing His true names. And as the Most High likes palindromes, the reverse order of the falling of these ones into the darkness is the order of their restoration into His Light, as He expressed in the verse above, MattithYâ´huw 20: 16. The next group on His schedule is all the middle to be ransomed from death. Did you say, “ransomed from death”? Yes. If you have noticed from sâţâ´n’s “great awakening,” their plan is the ‘depopulation’ genocide, without telling you it’s the elimination of all non-sâţâ´nists from the face of this earth. But they do not realize that their staying biologically alive while murdering the non-sâţâ´nists is separating the ones the Most High prefers in order to apply the Ransom He already paid. And they, in their greed, will finally bite off more than they can chew and murder His 144,000 witnesses too. This mistake, similar to their murdering Yâhuwshúa` on the cross, results in the right moment coming that the middle is capable of hearing and learning Yâ-hwéh Yâhuwshúa`’s testimony and being equipped with all they need to acquire the standing in His sight, in the middle; this is the meaning of 'anastasis' in Greek, which you find translated as “resurrection.” As explained, this is His gift to the middle, giving up His children to free the middle from the captivity that has been in an extended stay in this cosmos of darkness, hindered from entering into the Light, and worsened at that point by being unable to even get out of sh’ówl with the usual recycling into new babies (see our page What is reincarnation? On Recycling ). That is why the sâţâ´nists are sterilizing and promoting abortion, to prevent these non-sâţâ´nists from returning. Why mention His true names now to the middle sincere Christians if they cannot believe them yet? Because the hierarchy of the middle ones who cannot believe, nonetheless gathers benefits from not opposing the Most High and resisting the misled impulse to join with those doing so. In this upside-down world, not opposing Him will be better for them than doing the popular thing to oppose His witnesses. If you prefer death to the worship of sâţâ´n, you will be Ransomed. The widow, who is yisrâ’ë´l underneath, are sâţâ´nists knowingly, and they are refusing His ransom, refused our Passover Lamb. Passover meant 'Exemption', so they declined the Exemption and stay behind while we are to be evacuated from among them. Therefore, while the middle is still biologically alive, His witnesses of His true names will be first working to persuade non-sâţâ´nists not to worship sâţâ´n’s impostor, his ‘antichrist’ incarnation, and not apply the name Yâ-hwéh to that impostor. But His witnesses are not avoiding to mention Yâ-hwéh Yâhuwshúa`, so these middle ones can learn not to carnally instinctively oppose His names Yet notice : this main message for all non-sâţâ´nists to not worship the impostor (who is sâţâ´n), and for Christians to believe in the Work our Savior did on the cross, and to not believe the impostor claiming to be Him has been taught already for centuries ! It made it through the censorship since it’s the most critical thing to tell the non-sâţâ´nist middle! Yâ-hwéh Yâhuwshúa` made that happen! The information war which sâţâ´n made against that lost. So since the sâţâ´nists couldn’t beat that, they joined that and compensated by trying to turn the rest sâţâ´nic, even declaring ‘higher knowledge’ (gnosis) ‘satanic’ to prevent people from looking at it. Those sources even credit Erroneous (Irenaeus) for that! The witnesses who come to help the middle non-sâţâ´nists will both be gathered together , resurrected from physical death, at the same time, when the middle will all have come into existence of true yisrâ’ë´l (“Israel”), becoming “one overcoming the demon (‘ël)” (see the ‘ Elohim is not my Yâ-hwéh ' : satanic name substitutes misidentify Who we worship webpage). So, The Way of both the chosen and the invited middle go through death, overcoming it, as Yâhuwshúa` also did, in case you thought “salvation” meant not needing to die physically. The Way all these overcome the adversary is different: chosen believers on His true names overcome sâţâ´n by their belief while living, through Him Who defeated sâţâ´n, Who said He is The Way, believing on the Fruit. And non-sâţâ´nists and the ones of the tree/cross defeat sâţâ´n by refusing to worship sâţâ´n all The Way to the death of their temporary dirt-bodies, The Way of the cross: the Tree. Therefore, name-believers defeat sâţâ´n while alive, and cross followers after having died by preferring death over worshipping sâţâ´n. Remember the prodigal son, who returned after death, and the reassurance given to the elder son. Who had it more pleasant? One had it carnally pleasant until the times of trouble came; the other stayed with the Father. Who ended up with the inheritance? If you were the elder son, wouldn’t you like to know this is who you are, before the real trouble comes for the younger son? Are the Glad Tidings about which is the more pleasant way? Does it say that salvation has less hardship for the ones who believe in His names? No, the narrow Way is not described that way, and those Glad Tidings are not for the chosen ones. In fact, decoded Márquwç (“Mark”) 13: 10 says: …and among My one overcoming the demon (yisrâ’ë´l), all the ones (n.) tha t [ are ] not belonging to the one (f.) [ ~sister (underneath) ] [ being ] heathen masses (n.) , it behooves first to be proclaimed that the glad tidings (n.) [ are ] not pertaining to the ones (n./m.) ! The chosen ones are only relatively few, with 144,000 witnesses to be sealed. The Glad Tidings to be preached throughout this world is not about those few getting saved by having believed in His names! It is about the ones who currently have no regard for His true names also getting saved. In fact, this is the main question non-sâţâ´nists ask when we teach His true names! Examine below how Yâhuwshúa` says that a middle one having died separated from Him, if they trust in Him within the chosen ones He sends down to them, these shall live! He was speaking to a person in the middle about “Lazarus.” Yâhuwchânâ´n (“John”) 11: 25-26 decoded says: “ I, I cause to exist she [ ~unpaired néphesh (f.) ] which [ is ] not the (1) Standing in the middle ( Anastasis ) (f.) to bring forwards one overcoming the demon ( yisrâ’ë´l ), and she [ ~unpaired néphesh (f.) ] which [ is ] not the (2) Life (f.) . (1) he who without regard, [ is ] the one (m.) putting his trust on My one overcoming the demon (yisrâ’ë´l ), upon Me, even if he might die separated of Me, he shall be made to live of Me! And of one overcoming the demon ( yisrâ’ë´l ) , [ is ] (2) everyone that [ is ] he who [ is ] without regard for the One living of one overcoming the demon ( yisrâ’ë´l ) , yet [ is ] the one putting his trust on My one overcoming the demon ( yisrâ’ë´l ) , upon Me, who [ is ] not sâţâ´n, lest of the father of the sovereign ( ’avadówn ) , he might die separated of Me among My one overcoming the demon ( yisrâ’ë´l ) [ ~widow underneath ] of the one (n./m.) [ ~Yehuwthâ´h/sâţâ´n ] not [ being ] the Eternal One! … ” What about the "Glad Tidings of the Kingdom"? And when is that supposed to happen? Yâhuwshúa` said, in decoded MattithYâ´huw (“Matthew”) 24: 14: And of one overcoming the demon ( yisrâ’ë´l ) , shall be openly proclaimed/published this thing (n.) [ ~glad tidings (n.) ] [ is ] not pertaining to the ones (n./m.) : The glad tidings (n.) , [ being ] the one (n.) not of the royalty among the ones (m.) within one overcoming the demon ( yisrâ’ë´l ) , [ is ] pertaining to the entire (f.) [ ~unpaired néphesh (f.) sister ] [ being ] the one (f.) [ ~middle sister ] not the one (f.) being indwelled/inhabited, among My one overcoming the demon ( yisrâ’ë´l ) [ being ] the Testimony – [ “Yâhuwshúa` is Yâ-hwéh” ] belonging to all the ones (n.) that [ are ] not [ being ] the one (m.) [ ~counterfeit Savior, Yehuwthâ´h ] belonging to the heathen masses of one overcoming the demon ( yisrâ’ë´l ), and whenever that is, shall arrive, not pertaining to the ones (n./m.) , the termination (n.) . [ ~pruning the widow to do Holocaust of the middle sister (2 Moshéh 20: 18-19)] Note that these decoded verses reveal some things unknown in Christianity! “The ones (m.) ” is a term referring to existent ones who profess His true names, Yâ-hwéh Yâhuwshúa` , and here He calls these “ the royalty ”. As you see, the Glad Tidings is not for the royals , meaning not for the 144,000 Witnesses professing His true names getting saved. Scriptures say that those of yisrâ’ë´l above were already purchased (redeemed) after His resurrection. He says the Glad Tidings is about all the middle yisrâ’ë´l non-sâţâ´nists who do not, as yet, have the Testimony. However, the Glad Tidings is not for the heathen masses being the sâţâ´nists who are being the impostor, sâţâ´n incarnate. Their rescue is for much later and not our priority, though blessings are pronounced for Christians who bring forwards among them. (decoded Revelation 20: 5-6) Is my King James Version (KJV) Bible inspired? Can I trust it to look for His names? Did you know “James” comes from “Jacob,” which in Hebrew is “Ya’aqóv”? “Ya’aqóv” means Supplanter and is a standard reference to the impostor in scriptures. So, the King James Version would mean “King Supplanter Version.” Is it then any wonder that the KJV supplants our King, Yâhuwshúa`, with the impostor, sâţâ´n, by substituting Him with terms about him? Wouldn’t you consider this a sign that you cannot trust it for a source to obtain the name of our true King? There is not one instance of one intact name for the Most High within the KJV. Why? The short answer is because sâţâ´n ordered his satanists to prohibit His name from being taught. (Acts 4: 17) How? Your Bible is in English. The English language did not exist since the Tower of Bavel; it was invented relatively recently as a combination of French and Germanic languages. Your Bible is a translation of scriptures written in earlier languages, namely, Hebrew and Greek. They translated the “Old Testament” from the very unreliable Masoretic “Text,” which was altered by sâţâ´nist scribes after Yâhuwshúa` ascended to deny our Savior, so the Greek LXX (Septuagint), which was translated from the earlier scripture (before coding) is more reliable. The “New Testament” was initially written in Hebrew, but they translated it from the Greek “Textus Receptus” when the most reliable Greek manuscript is the Byzantine Majority text. Nonetheless, all of these manuscripts, Hebrew and Greek, were abbreviated by the sâţâ´nist scribes using their shorthand code, and the translations of that to other languages had to be highly liberal, not strict, to make it easily legible, due to the code’s degutting of the scripture by the omissions. And even furthermore, afterward, the English establishment translators substituted all names and titles for those of sâţâ´n, making the readers think they were “translations.” One should expect the proper names of our Savior to be found rendered in scripture as original Hebrew names, transliterated into English, not transliterations of Grecianized names nor evolved common English versions. Understand that names are proper nouns that should not ever change and should be rendered according to their original sound in their language when books are translated, especially in the case of the One Whose name is pure, which we depend on to call on Him. Altered names are different names and call different ones, especially if the original One doesn’t accept other names. Notwithstanding, your KJV preferred to alter nearly every proper name to common English (per)versions used at the time by commoners. A smart move to become the best-selling book of all time, but the zealous defend it as being purer than the original! Your English Bible translation is not the inspired scriptures about which Páulus (“Paul”) spoke about to Timótheos (“Timothy”). He was referring to copies of the original Hebrew scriptures. Those scriptures did contain the true name of our Savior. Let’s look at how it appeared in those scriptures: His name, forever and for all generations, is Yâ-hwéh יָהְוֶ֨ה (often transliterated as “Yahweh”) The name of the Anointed is Yâhuwshúa` יָהוּשֻׁ֥עַ (Sometimes phonetically spelled “Yahushua”). Shallow vessels don’t search deeply and usually settle for less than the Truth. Usually, the first clue one seeking Him sees to all the alterations is seeing the Strong’s Concordance of the KJV document the sâţâ´nic title “Lord ” as having replaced #3068 Yâ-hwéh (which they misrendered as Yehovah). Surely some took that error, also found in KJV as “Jehovah,” and ran with it. But the much deeper research proving what the authentic names are is found in our name study: “Why these are the correct names” found in the FPS scripture download . My pastor says the name we use is "how we say it in English." Is this true? IMPORTANT - A name is a specific intelligible sound that summons/invokes someone, and it must sound the same to everyone, no matter what language they speak. Therefore, to render a proper name, to people of different languages, in writing, one must render that sound in the other person’s alphabet, using their phonetic system, to replicate that sound as accurately as possible. That is called a transliteration of a name. Sometimes, special characters are used in a transliteration when more than the ordinary letters are needed to be accurate. Yâ-hwéh Yâhuwshúa` is the most correct transliteration of the dual names of the Most High in English. The “â” symbol represents a sound that is known as the “short ŏ” in English phonetical symbols, which is not currently found as often in modern dictionaries, and it transliterates the Hebrew qâmets â, because we are utilizing the pronunciation symbols used in the well-known and available Strong’s Concordance Lexicon, as much as possible. We also explain our transliteration system in our Pronunciation Guide found in the FPS scripture download but learning its pronunciation is easiest using our the hidden name tutorial songs channel. On the other hand, a translation of a name is to render the meaning of a foreign name in our language, but be aware that a translation does not call the bearer of that name. These rules have been violated repeatedly in many ways in establishment bible translations, so much so that many are confused and do not even know the meaning of these terms. (Example: Këph (a rock), translated to petros (a rock), transliterated to peter (bad transliteration of petros). How does this apply in real life? Let this non-scriptural example suffice: Do you know you would not be able to call “Christopher Columbus” if he were here because you don’t know how to pronounce his name? Nor do Spanish speakers know it; they call him “Cristobal Colón.” Both are incorrect. His actual name is Italian, Cristóforo Colombo. If you’d yell the other two names at him, he’d only look at you funny; this is the same thing with almost all KJV-named people. They would not know you are calling them. This has dire and disastrous consequences when the tempestuous storm of sâţâ´n comes, and Christianity calls for help using names belonging to demons (Revelation’s “Trumpets,” see Disclosure in the FPS translation). The sâţâ´nists misled Christianity. Let’s undo that—their mission. “Jezebel” in Revelation represents sâţâ´nist infiltrators misleading Christians. And sâţâ´nists are who exalted themselves to mislead all middle yisrâ’ë´l’s many non-sâţâ´nists of this world towards sâţâ´n, including Christians. The sâţâ´nists are who altered the scriptures, which Christians depended on for information. And like everything else in this world, sâţâ´nists turn everything upside-down to put themselves on top and tell the middle there is no elite while secretly exalting themselves. Cognitive dissonance (denial) makes most find it hard to believe that one’s pastor they trusted, and looked up to, could be a sâţâ´nist, the man they hired with their offerings to do their scripture research while they were busy working. At what point does one constitute being a sâţâ´nist? Your pastor/preacher/priest went to seminary, was a tame pupil (not trained in critical thinking), and knows Yâhuwshúa` is the Most High and that He is Yâ-hwéh in Person. But he does not and would not tell anybody these are His names. His congregation would leave, and his income would end. Right there, he’s like the servant who buried the talent (MattithYâ´huw 25: 24-30). Furthermore, he is the most likely person in his church to know that the names he does teach his audience are not His names, yet still, he teaches these names. "This makes him to be preaching about someone else . And those being false names, those are lies, and your pastor/preacher/priest knows well that the father of the lie is sâţâ´n. Does he know the meaning of each term he teaches? If so, it’s worse for him, but this is sufficient. He is teaching lies of sâţâ´n, in preference over His true names. And if he knows the meanings of the lies, he knows he is a preacher of sâţâ´n. So how can one say your pastor/preacher/priest is not a sâţâ´nist? Their motivations for detaching potential true believers from the Most High were to put the middle non-sâţâ´nists under sâţâ´n’s authority to sacrifice them to him, thinking to curry favor with him and survive the judgment to come as a remnant left behind. They worship him deliberately and think their insane and temperamental creator would be less annoyed and appeased if they were alone with him, without those worshipping him in pretense only because they’re deceived. It has been them who pretended to be our leaders, to mislead us to sâţâ´n. Look: 2 Qorinthíym (“Corinthians”) 2: 17 speaks clearly about the sâţâ´nists’ disinformation, but decoded, it’s even more straightforward: For the reason that of sâţâ´n [is] not the Yâ-hwéh of Whom we exist, as the ones (m.) [are] not the remnant/left behind [ ~widow underneath ] , peddling their corruption , [ ~which is ] of the one (n./m.) [ ~Yehuwthâ´h/ sâţâ´n ] not [being] the Word (m.) of The Way (f.) [being] the ones (m.) [ ~Words (m.) (dual-names) ] not of the mighty one of ‘aharón (light-carrier/lucifer) , instead as originating from “I shall cause to exist (‘a-hyéh)” of one overcoming the demon (yisrâ’ë´l ) of the untarnished! Instead, as originating from “I shall cause to exist (‘a-hyéh)” of one overcoming the demon (yisrâ’ë´l) [ ~which are ] of the mighty one of ‘aharón (light-carrier/lucifer) against the vision-Source, we speak of Me : the one s (m.) [ ~Words (m.) (dual-names) ] not of the mighty one of ‘aharón (light-carrier/lucifer), among the ones (m.) within one overcoming the demon (yisrâ’ë´l) , [are] pertaining to the Anointed One! (The blue font information in the decoded scriptures you see here (and on this website) were omitted by sâţâ´nist scribes systematically from the establishment version of scriptures, which were translated as their authorized “Holy Bible,” utilizing their systematic code.) If you are a royal, you are a priest of the 'order of the royals of the Correctness' (the meaning of Malkëy-tsétheq). The names of Yâ-hwéh Yâhuwshúa` will elicit a positive reaction in you since it abounds in the fragrance of the knowledge of the Anointed One, whereas if you are not, it smells of doom to you. This is explained in the verses immediately preceding this verse. If these names appeal to you, it is a spiritual sign to you from Him, His Envoy to you, telling you the scent is good. If so, you may be one already existing, invited to be one of His Witnesses, the 144,000. These are the existent ones who volunteered to assist our Savior, being also saviors for the captivity which sâţâ´n is currently making of the non-sâţâ´nist and Christian middle. Since sâţâ´n, the unjust steward, has no intention of conceding the middle to the Highest, these royals are arrived and are being activated presently to do similarly as Yâ-hwéh Yâhuwshúa` did, as the Descender. His dirt-body physically died. However, the demons did not have any power over Him to apprehend Him, nor even see Him as He descended invisible to them, in His Light, to invade and take over the underworld. Then during His three nights and three days in the heart of the earth, He emptied the underworld (sh’ówl) of all but three: Qayin (Cain), Herodes (who murdered the children), and Yehuwdah (“Judas”), who was poorly advised by his demon, sâţâ´n, to kill himself and precede Yâhuwshúa`’s arrival ‘in case He might take pity on him.’ And Christians have heard that our Savior took captivity captive and ascended from there and was seen alive only by believers and not by the sâţâ´nists who paid spectators of Him to say they never saw Him but professed to have seen Him risen. And Christians have also heard that the Witnesses will also spend three and a half days physically dead, unburied, in the same Yruwshâláim (“Jerusalem”) before coming back to life. So, realize that like Yâhuwshúa`, Who they will manifest within them visibly shining following the Sixth Seal, these Witnesses will also be invulnerable to the demons whenever they may physically die after their 1260 days of testimony. So, when these are physically dead, these 144,000 pure ones will also raid and take over the underworld and empty it of the non- sâţâ´nists and Christians who will have died, murdered by the sâţâ´nists in their holocaust sacrifice to sâţâ´n you have mildly heard as “depopulation.” Because of this, these ones, the Witnesses, are reckoned as the Keys of the underworld our Savior has. Given this, have you ever sensed an urge inside you to assist our Savior during these end-times? Such feelings are memories from before your lifetime, being reminded to you. If so, examine these scriptures, which further explain why you should consider following The Way of Yâ-hwéh Yâhuwshúa`, Who did all these things before the ones. Here you will find some reasons why one should believe in His dual names than just resist believing sâţâ´n to death. Note that the “widow sister” refers to the sâţâ´nists who will be left behind. MattithYâ´huw 7: 13-14 ¶ Enter ye in charge of one overcoming the demon (yisrâ’ë´l) through not [being] the one ( n. ) [ ~Yehuwthâ´h/sâţâ´n ] of the constricted-off (f.) [ ~sister, middle ] , of the Entryway (f.) that [ is ] this One! The broad-one (f.) [ is ] she [ ~confusion ] which [ is ] not the Entryway (f.) of one overcoming the demon (yisrâ’ë´l) , and the wide-open one (f.) [ is ] she which [ is ] not The Way (f.) . She [ ~widow sister ] which [ exists ] not [ is ] the one (f.) leading off the irreverent of Me into My one overcoming the demon (yisrâ’ë´l) of the one (f.) [ ~sister, middle ] not [ being ] the extermination (f.) of one overcoming the demon (yisrâ’ë´l) , so the Many-ones (m.) [ 2 Këph 2: 2 ] , they not be the ones (m.) , the ones (m.) entering in charge of one overcoming the demon (yisrâ’ë´l) through of the same One (f.) [ ~Way (f.) ] of the Son . ¶ Which (n.) [ is ] the constricted one (f.) ? She [ ~sister, middle] which [ is ] not the Entryway (f.) of one overcoming the demon (yisrâ’ë´l) , and the one (f.) having been constricted/compressed [ is ] she which [ is ] not The Way (f.) . She [ ~widow sister] which [exists ] not [ is ] the one (f.) leading off the irreverent of Me into My one overcoming the demon (yisrâ’ë´l) of the one (f.) [ ~sister, middle] not [ being ] the Life (f.) of one overcoming the demon (yisrâ’ë´l) , yet the few-ones (m.) to drink [ ~experience] , who cause to exist [ ~Witnesses who descend] (pl.), [ are ] the ones (m.) , not the ones (m.) finding for themselves to acknowledge according as [ being ] the same one (f.) [ ~sister, middle] [being] the Son [ Songs 118: 19-20, Yshá`Yâhuw 22: 8 ] Is the invitation from Him to believe in the dual names of our Savior Yâ-hwéh Yâhuwshúa` meant to activate you? Or are you one invited but meant to overcome sâţâ´n by resisting him to the death believing in the Work done on the cross by our Savior, without His names? Both of these will be gathered together to Him after the Seventh Trumpet resurrection because the Many come to exist after their death they are ransomed from, and at that time is when all of these will have the Testimony of the dual-names of one overcoming the demon (yisrâ’ë´l): see Disclosure (Revelation) 11: 15-17, decoded in FPS. Your brothers in Yâ-hwéh Yâhuwshúa` at YahwehYahuwshua.org back to top "The last shall be first, and the first shall be last. The first, they who were created before us, therefore, are the invisibles, for they were created before men, who shall receive the mystery shall be with them in the region of the [highest] heavens.” – The Books of the Savior ( AKA“Pistis Sophia”)

  • 2 types of NWO | Yâ-hwéh Yâhuwshúa`

    The divided house of satan formed a New World Order (NWO) under satan's remote direction. So, you're not going to be rescued from the old NWO; you're transitioning to a new NWO. TWO TYPES OF (PHYSICAL) NEW WORLD ORDERS GLOBALIST ELITIST KHAZARIAN MAFIA The United States went off the gold standard in 1933 Running as a 'Corporation of the USA' with foreign entities on foreign soil (Washington DC) Global Poverty Global Hunger World slavery (spiritual & material) Global Asset Relocation Income Tax & Property Tax Cashless Society Disarmament of Citizens Removal of the "god" gene Depopulation Concentration Camps satan-worshiping (cannibalism, pedophilia, children sacrifice, etc.) The Great Reset DONALD JOHN TRUMP ANTICHRIST Potentially zeros out all credit card, mortgage, and other bank debt due to illegal banking and government activities. This is the Federal Reserve’s worst nightmare, a “jubilee” or a forgiveness of debt. Abolishes the income tax. Abolishes the IRS. Employees of the IRS will be transferred into the US Treasury national sales tax area. Creates a 14% flat rate for non-essential new items, only sales tax revenue for the government. In other words, food and medicine will not be taxed or used items such as old homes. Increases benefits to senior citizens. Returns Constitutional Law to all courts and legal matters. Installs the original Title of Nobility amendment. Establishes new Presidential and Congressional elections within 120 days after NESARA's announcement. The interim government will cancel all National Emergencies and return us back to constitutional law. Monitors elections and prevents illegal election activities of special interest groups. Creates a new U.S. Treasury rainbow currency backed by gold, silver, and platinum precious metals, ending the bankruptcy of the United States initiated by Franklin Roosevelt in 1933. Forbids the sale of American birth certificate records as chattel property bonds by the US Department of Transportation. Initiates new U.S. Treasury Bank System in alignment with Constitutional Law Eliminates the Federal Reserve System. During the transition period, the Federal Reserve will be allowed to operate side by side with the U.S. treasury for one year in order to remove all Federal Reserve notes from the money supply. Restores financial privacy. Retrains all judges and attorneys in Constitutional Law. Ceases all aggressive U.S. government military actions worldwide. Establishes peace throughout the world. Releases enormous sums of money for humanitarian purposes. Enables the release of over 6,000 patents of suppressed technologies that are being withheld from the public under the guise of national security, including free energy devices, anti-gravity, and sonic healing machines. THE TWO NWOs: The divided house of satan formed a New World Order (NWO) under satan's remote direction, though the opposing demons working towards atheism and chaos trying to prevent satan’s ambition to devour all into himself being their god (demon). These made the system’s rulers each selfishly corrupt, stealing for themselves, and murdering for their selfish needs, depopulating as is being exposed about this world corruption. The world was enslaved in spirit and body by ignorance and against its will, and to serve for their material needs, and ownership of their bodies registered by birth certificates and SSN or other national IDs. Waking up to this is being called the Great Awakening. But the prospective solution to satan's own divided house is actually the New World Order wished for by satanists, with satan’s incarnation: the antichrist on top, having all the information to extort everyone, keeping them all in line organizing the chaos. The corruption and the stealing will all be satan’s, along with all executions, for his own thirst for bloodshed. In return, this antichrist will bribe all offering material prosperity, material-debt freedom, moral licentiousness and pantheism of all kinds of demon-worship. Instead of the other method, this slavery to satan will be put into effect acknowledging and loving his antichrist persona, voluntarily, and ownership of their néphesh (“souls”) registered through reverent homage to the superior rank (worship) of this one, joining his religion(s) including his counterfeit chosen people, visiting his rebuilt material false temple, to the point he will take possession of these. AN 88 YEARS INTERVAL: Believers in Yâ-hwéh Yâhuwshúa` do not partake in practices of the occult - Rev 13:18 (KJV) but rather expose them - Ephesians 5:11 (KJV). In satanic numerology, the number eighty-eight (88) carries great significance for the Cabal. Looking at the number 88, we are told it symbolizes the double directions of the infinity of the universe, that is to say, the infinitely small and the infinitely large. Allegedly the number 88 is also the numbered representation of the cross swastika - three times cranked. The number 88 is a white supremacist numerical code for "Heil Hitler." H is the eighth letter of the alphabet, so 88 = HH = Heil Hitler. One of the most frequent white supremacist symbols, 88, is used for the duration of the entire white supremacist movement, no longer simply neo-Nazis. Chess is a two-player strategy board game played on a chessboard, a checkered game board with 64 squares arranged in an 8×8 grid (Freemason Floors). The eight ball in billiards/pool is black and white and finalizes the game, signifying time in some respects. The Freemasons believe "as above, so believe - 88!" The masonic (33 degree) year (1933), which they chose for the USA to go off the gold standard, is an 88 years interval until 2021, when the gold standard will return with NESARA. So, you're not going to be rescued from the old New World Order; you're transitioning to new NWO with satan at the top, in person! And he is making you welcome it with open arms. Trump warned everyone that he is the serpent - repeatedly reading "The Snake" poem at his rallies, which is being welcomed with open arms. President Trump is rumored to become inaugurated on March 4, 2021 RD, as the 19th president of the restored Republic of the United States which was suspended in favor of a Vatican Corporation in 1871 RD . If so, this 'great reset' allows Trump to remain as president for longer terms. Emperor of the world? Keep in mind that President Franklin D Roosevelt "won" a record four terms in office from 1933 RD until he died in 1945 RD. After he left office, the Twenty-second Amendment of the US Constitution was voted through congress on March 21, 1947 RD. We suspect that DJT will do away with the Corporation's amendments made to the United States Constitution after 1871 RD. helpful links: We disclaim all name substitutions and false terms for Yâ-hwéh Yâhuwshúa` https://johnhenryhill.wordpress.com/2014/02/20/the-united-states-of-america-corproration-listings-laugh-or-weep/ https://humansarefree.com/2020/09/proof-covid-19-planned-new-world-order.html https://gesara.news/global-economic-security-and-reformation-act.html http://annavonreitz.com/beforethingsgetoutofhand.pdf http://www.annavonreitz.com/annavonreitz.pdf Back to Who is Trump?

  • What is Reincarnation?| Yâ-hwéh Yâhuwshúa`

    Reincarnation, more accurately recycling,is early Christian common knowledge. WHAT IS REINCARNATION? On Recycling Most traditional Christian doctrines believe in a resurrection of one’s néphesh (“soul”) into a new and different kind of body of pure flesh, a new body made possible by our Savior (Yâhuwshúa`), because it’s described and explained in Qorinthíym (“Corinthians”). But the question of whether a néphesh (“soul”) ever returns to live more lifetimes in a different body of the same kind of corruptible flesh is one being denied by most traditional Christian doctrines, although a few approved examples remain in the establishment’s teachings, for example that of the son of ’avadówn (“son of perdition”) being both Yehuwthâ´h (“judas”) and the coming impostor-savior “antichrist”, and the mention that Yâhuwchânâ´n the Immerser (“john the baptist”) is ’EliyYâ´huw. We are calling this returning in a different body of the same kind of corruptible flesh, “recycling ” of the néphesh (“soul”). But beyond these examples, most Christians do not include the recycling of the néphesh (“soul”) into different bodies of the same kind of corruptible flesh in their belief-set. Why not? Most, simply because of lack of information, some due to trust in their teachers who repeatedly allege this lifetime to be their only chance and possibility to join their flocks, and few due to having read the establishment’s approved canons of scriptures they translated in a way to support their accepted doctrines, and trusting those. Yet religions outside Christianity report recycling and numerous personal experience testimonials report recycling, and historians report recycling to have been part of early Christian doctrine also. How is this topic important? Why is it vital for us to know this happens? And how can we find the evidence that has been covered up within the inspired scriptures? This webpage will answer these questions. The Recycling/Returning (Anastrepho) –AKA “Reincarnation” of the Néphesh One new age prosperity priestess, Oprah Winfrey, posed a curious question to the audience on her TV show, which aired sometime in the 1990s (Roman calendar), which we stumbled across in a recent year, which publicly displayed some of the consequences of ignorance about recycling, that provoked this article. Oprah’s chosen panel was contrasted by a Christian audience that struggled, trying to defend against Oprah’s intellectualized ideology embracing one of man’s many mistakes – which is to believe that there are many different ways to ascend towards the Father, Yâ-hwéh Yâhuwshúa` . Oprah attacked that the One Way scriptural concept itself is wrong. One Christian guest shouted, “Jesus is the Way!”, to which Oprah responded (and I paraphrase): ‘what if you are somewhere on a remote part of the earth and never get to hear the name of our Savior? What if you are a person who lives with a loving heart, as our Savior would have had you to live and for the very purpose He came to earth, and die without ever having heard His name? Does he/she go to hell?’ By saying this, Oprah denied the need for Yâhuwshúa` to ever have come and give up the life of His dirt-body on the cross, making Him irrelevant. So, several guests attempted to allay every negative opinion against our Savior made by Oprah. The audience’s group of Christians failed miserably, attempting to bargain with Oprah, because they were spiritually naked, not equipped with the Truth, nor empowered with His wisdom, to overcome her lies from satan. The reason for their defeat is simple, Christianity is reprogrammed with disinformation and taught that a properly inspired developed mind is one which accepts as true all what Irenaeus and the Church Fathers approved so as to dismiss recycling as heresy, as they did centuries ago. Such deceived Christians disbelieve in the recycling of the néphesh (“soul”) into new material bodies, also known as “reincarnation” to other religions, because the powers of darkness showed the foolish pastors teaching the error that through teaching ‘one life to live’, they could increase their material profits and gains through extortion of joining them or dying and going to hell forever. Those other religions using the term “reincarnation ” are unaware of or deny the resurrection into His new and different kind of pure flesh bodies. Therefore, because of reincarnation’s association to pagan religions, to some Christians, it becomes an alien, pagan, foreign-sounding heresy, which they view with horror if not alarm. They cannot accept its existence without renouncing their faith in what the canon says, and risk being ostracized by their flocks, because it’s smeared due to its association with Hinduism and other oriental religions, which openly embrace this concept which spread to other parts of Asia. Since reincarnation as a term does not specify what kind of flesh a néphesh (“soul”) reenters, we find it inadequate, so we use the term recycling when reentering material corruptible flesh, and resurrecting when entering the spiritual, incorruptible pure flesh new body He gives us. Recycling inherently means returning as the same material, and the neologism spares us having to explain and disclaim those thinking it originated from paganism. How Did this Bit of Truth get to Asia? Would it surprise you to learn that our Savior Yâhuwshúa` discussed reincarnation openly with His pupils? These very pupils were sent off as His delegates (“apostles”), and it was these who also traveled to Asia carrying our Savior’s teachings to our blind brothers there. After their teachings became diluted by satan, they still kept various concepts, albeit Headless; one such lesson is of us pairing again with our heavenly envoy or twin, “didymos” in Greek, (syzygy in Coptic). in Hebrew, Tâ’ówm, which is where the name “Thomas” evolved, and this re-pairing is which completes us in Him with Wisdom in the marriage chamber, our separate pure place, as a perfect union, but they lost the point and turned this into “tao” or “daoism.” Evidently, the same situation occurred in India, undoubtedly. Since they had learned long ago from Yâhuwshúa`’s delegates that the area behind one’s forehead, between the eyes, is the separate place and the sitting Throne reserved for Yâ-hwéh Yâhuwshúa`, the adversary excised this teaching, starting with His names, and what remains instead is sporting a “bindi” painted spot on their foreheads to “protect their “third eye,” the false vision source of the evil spirit occupying their separate place. Believers in Yâhuwshúa` as well as rebels against Him recycle, to continue their work for Him or against Him, respectively. Once a néphesh is granted the Truth in a capacitated lifetime and obtains Life, they may still recycle, being sent to teach the Truth to others. This concept also has vestiges left in India’s Hinduism, with the recycling of those ignorant of the Truth described as suffering “samsara," and obtaining this Truth as achieving “nirvana." But that Truth of Yâ-hwéh Yâhuwshúa` was not retained in their teachings. So to accurately answer Oprah’s question: every néphesh which originated from Yâ-hwéh incarnates through several lifetimes over time and is only able to attain eternal permanence (existence) by correctly acknowledging the Truth, that Yâhuwshúa` is Yâ-hwéh, our Savior, and giving Him the preference (mistranslated as “glory”) during one’s more capable nativity (“generation”) than one’s earlier blotted out lives, wherein he/she may never have heard His name. But notably, to negate Oprah’s deceit, no one (other than Yâ-hwéh Yâhuwshúa`) has ever qualified on their own to fulfill the law (torah) of satan, and all fell short of reaching the Father. One only gets reckoned correct (“righteous”) One Way , through Him, acknowledging and professing Yâ-hwéh Yâhuwshúa`, a name already expunged also from the establishment’s teachings. But these Truths were not present there among Oprah’s studio audience, much less among her panel. The Word Reincarnation/Recycling in Scriptures The word reincarnation derives from Latin roots re- (prefix), “again and again” (repetition) incarnare , meaning to reenter “flesh.” Remember, we said it doesn’t specify which kind of flesh. Yet, in fact, “Reincarnation” is a misnomer because the néphesh (“soul”) recycles in a new but similarly corruptible dirt-body but not making the same previous flesh body again. Therefore, pay no mind to those finding lookalike ancient images resembling current people as evidence of recycling. The only physical resemblance may be in the eyes , the windows to the néphesh (“soul”). Because of the ubiquitous acceptance of the term “reincarnation,” some ‘Bible thumpers’ (often KJV enthusiasts) argue that “reincarnation” cannot be true because that particular word is not found in their approved translation, the “Authorized Version.” That is only true because they have been looking for the wrong word . The main word to search for in Greek is “ANASTREPHO," found in both Greek post-advent scriptures and Septuagint (LXX) pre-advent scriptures. For those truth-seekers wanting pearls for word searches, here they are : Anastrepho , Greek Strong’s #390, means to return up, found in lexicons “to turn hither and thither, to turn one’s self about, sojourn dwell in a place” (recycling), and only metaphorically reinterpreted as “to conduct one’s self, behave one’s self, live” in order to conceal its true meaning of recycling in establishment translations of scripture. But wasn’t scripture first in Hebrew? Looking at what Hebrew words they translated as anastrepho, we relevantly find Hebrew Strong’s #02015 hâphákh , meaning also “to turn about, turn around, to change, transform, and in the hithpael conjugation, “to transform oneself, to turn this way and that, turn every way." We also find anastrepho translates Hebrew Strong’s #03318 yâtsâ´’, to be brought out/forth, to go or come out or forth, to come or go forth, to come out of. Also translated as anastrepho, we find #06213 `âsâ´h to work, #06437 pânâ´h to turn, be turned back, #07725 shuwv to return, come back, to bring back, cause to return, and #0813 shânâ´h to change, alter, to be repeated, to disguise oneself; all relevant to recycling . But if you look up these instances, you will find them all mistranslated in the establishment’s approved Authorized Version(s). Scriptural references to recycling of the néphesh (“soul”) are quite common in the pre-advent scriptures before Yâhuwshúa`’s ministry and post-advent scriptures. When retranslated correctly, they appear to mention recycling without much ado or fanfare, as though it had been a well-known and accepted belief. The book of Dâ´niyyË´’l and YchezqË´’l refers to recycling and the same specific people reappearing at vastly different times. The scroll of Bârúwkh also discusses Bârúwkh’s ‘returning’ to live in these end-times along with other Yâhuwshúa`-believers. Proper scripture translations of other scriptures of Páulus (“Paul”) reveal that people hearing him had trouble believing in Páulus’ preaching of the Resurrection (returning to live in new different pure flesh bodies) because they already thought they return anew in a newborn (returning to live in new different corruptible flesh bodies). (Source quote Theókleia & the ankh Egyptians and their monks found in philliposiym 3:17-19) So, Who/What Orchestrated this Massive Cover-up? The central business agenda of the establishment’s conservative Church Fathers and other religious authorities was to prefer higher numbers of followers for greater profits, being guided by evil dark agencies of satan, who placed them in official positions of authority over the believers in Yâ-hwéh Yâhuwshúa`. They happen to be those nepheshes who have not accepted the Truth, recycling to continue their work against Yâhuwshúa`. Their aim has always been to choose what doctrines they can stretch or alter to fit their agendas and block and smear whatever appears threatening to them in the various scriptures and, more recently, in numerous resurfaced Gnostic frameworks, to mistranslate them using their approved scholars to publicly ostracize and excommunicate everyone and blacklist everything they believe to be morally inexcusable in their eyes. In this way, good, significant, and revelatory texts inspired by Yâhuwshúa` were very much and often lumped together with satanic writings and labeled as PSEUDO (false/fake) uninspired heresy and thereby anathema (kept separate/cursed). Their strange consensus that there cannot be any more Yâhuwshúa`-inspired books of glad tidings than four in number is from Irenaeus, one of the so-called “church fathers”, because he saw there are four winds, and four directions; so they thought it should be fitting to ban other inspired books of glad tidings; this served their purposes by eliminating many books condemning them. The Author’s Personal Experience Until the summer of 2005 RD (roman dates), I had never investigated recycling ("reincarnation"), and the few ideas I had about it were shaped mainly by disparaging comments and attitudes I had occasionally encountered from the Christian community. However, I was always drawn to this topic because, from my very early childhood, I had a recurring nightmare: I was standing on a barren, white land, surrounded by others—some of them dressed like me, in long robes and headdresses. Not far off, Roman soldiers were approaching. The atmosphere erupted in panic; there was yelling and screaming. Then, suddenly, my knees gave out, and I saw my own head roll away from my body, now lying headless among others on the ground. My eyelids didn’t close right away. I didn’t blink. Somehow, I kept my gaze fixed on the final seconds of that life I once lived. The last image burned into my sight was of Roman soldiers—leather Caligula sandals pounding the earth, swords raised high, storming forward, trampling the dead, and continuing the slaughter. I searched museum databases for images of the women’s headdresses from my recurring dream. The results only extended as far back as the 14th century. From this, I’ve concluded that I am a recycled 1st-century believer in Yâ-hwéh Yâhuwshúa. Like myself, others recall past lives during their subsequent childhoods, found in all cultures worldwide. The Dangers of Keeping us Ignorant of Our Previous Lives Scriptural/spiritual lack of knowledge, which is unintentional, is ignorance, whereas when it is intentional, it is rebellion. Lack of spiritual information (nescience) about our previous lives is one such ignorance that is not only dangerous to one’s néphesh (“soul”) but also makes us spiritually naked (undefended), making us thus vulnerable, empowering dark agencies to exploit it inserting their misinformation and threats – and this ploy is intentional, and this strategy is widespread everywhere. It is in every Truth-seekers’ interest to research the translations of various scriptures, canonical and noncanonical, as one needs no proficiency in Greek or Hebrew to uncover revealing hidden messages in scriptures that go against the establishment’s traditional doctrines. But to do so correctly, one needs His guidance, acknowledging Yâ-hwéh Yâhuwshúa` by name, and making use of a good concordance, Scripture dictionary, and even individual historical records by live observers such as Bârúwkh (“Baruch”), Nóach, and Josephus. Learning what scriptures really say recovers the knowledge lost by unscrupulous alterations of scripture and prevents our exploitation by the forces of darkness. The scripture canon teaches that a man’s néphesh is in a state of pilgrimage and that the dirt-body it inhabits is NOT its correct dwelling place but a temporary place of sojourn, which implies that its true home is beyond this material plane (cosmos). Although it says that at physical death, the néphesh (“soul”) goes to sh’ówl, the dirt-body to the earth (dirt), and the spirit returns to the Father, but we are not from sh’owl, that is not our home. Therefore, we from Him must somehow leave it to return to the First, even if we did not learn His name during a lifetime. Why would they allow such questions to remain in our bibles? Why SO few? Some of the lights stolen by satan are still within his corps (spiritual body), not emerging yet, so Oprah proposes they must be emerging out through some other way than our Savior, during only their first lifetime. She does not know or hides that she knows that Satan buries our néphesh (“soul”) again and again, embedded for a lifetime again in a flesh-and-blood vessel, an animal body, a temporary habitation, to be granted another opportunity to learn the Truth from our previous mistakes. But his demons perpetuate our slavery giving us the handicap of losing our memory of our past lives and experiences by giving us a cup of forgetfulness that blots the memories of our earlier life; However, our néphesh - which is not part of the brain - has a blueprint that exists after death and contains within itself the mental and moral quality which is displayed as "character" and the essence of our true self (being). All these things are found in inspired scriptures, and finding this out can prevent the tragedy of dying without the Truth to recycle still ignorant of the Truth because life living within Him is so much better. Please click on this link to review our findings to some poorly translated scriptures in the canon, now accurately translated, demonstrating recycling . Suppression of the Knowledge of the Recycling of the Néphesh Pride associated with knowing anything is most active in people who know the least, especially with regard to the things of Yâ-hwéh Yâhuwshúa`. The pride about knowledge among the educated of this world, whether self-educated or formally educated, is based on collected heaps of material facts rather than by accepting His understanding of how the immaterial world affects people’s néphesh, found in scriptures. The “church fathers” were proud like their father, satan, and worked to suppress this knowledge of recycling, making the sources used in education only contain their teachings, so this pride would continue the work of suppressing the Truth. A false understanding many proud religious recycling-deniers promote is their belief that a néphesh is just the life of our dirt-bodies, and ‘what you see is all there is,' when, in fact, the dirt-body is not the real self but a mere temporary covering for the néphesh. According to them, when one dies, that’s their end; sh’ówl to them is the grave, nothing more – this is a Jehovah’s witness and SDA false doctrine. The néphesh is a spiritual seed, not material, and not even the same shape as the dirt-body and is the thing that recycles. Confusion arises because the ‘fiery one,' the flesh’s néphesh, which is an emanation of the adversary, is sometimes mentioned in scriptures, giving another meaning to néphesh as being one’s carnal (sexual) appetites. That néphesh dies with the death of the dirt-body. Proud materially scientific recycling-deniers claim that the thousands of recycled-néphesh cases generally do not stand up to their examination but are explicable in terms of natural causes such as genetics, repressed memory, and even lying has been suggested. Certainly, one can think of many other issues about which the authorities deny the truth despite mountains of evidence. Recycling-deniers, in their denials, have even attributed these facts to the work of occult powers. Notwithstanding the scientific evidence to the contrary, many recycling-deniers disagree with it because it is laborious to change to believe in these concepts without having the memory of a personal experience. A personal memory, we believe, adds much to contribute to one’s intellectual understanding to obtain a spiritual belief. Church History of Suppressing the Concept of Recycling Now a quick look at some vitally important “church” history, which contributed to the suppression of the concept of recycling, and then at what accurately translated scriptures tell us concerning the subject. In short, the truth about the recycling of the néphesh/past lives was generally acknowledged in the Judaism of old testament times (except among the Tsathuwqíym (“Sadducees”), who didn’t accept His resurrection or any transmutation of the “soul”) was known by believers in Yâhuwshúa`. But in 553 B.C., a focal point and exceptionally unpleasant incident transpired, which buried the truth (more about that below). The establishment’s interpretation of scriptures depends on biased standards they forced on the content, not on sound standards of scriptural understanding, of having the Mind of the Anointed, and making an accurate translation. The current establishment’s interpretation results from a centuries-long perpetuation of an illegal Church council's ruling, dating from 553 A.D., that reincarnation was not to be a part of the Church’s dogma because Origen was excommunicated for widely reteaching this. Very few people know about this bit of history; fewer still know the background of this decision or that Origen had been reckoned a “church father” before that. Specifically, “ The Roman Emperor Constantine married his way into power. His wife mysteriously disappeared. His second wife was his ticket to the throne. Then he had her killed. His third wife was a prostitute who had risen to the throne in the same diabolical ways Constantine had and who lived to have a devastating effect on the belief in reincarnation. She feared [sic (because her fear)] that her sins would follow from lifetime to lifetime infuriated her. She did not like the idea of karma. Her life was filled with lies and treachery. She was not interested in advocated [sic (advocating)] any religion that would demote her in another life. Thus, she persuaded Emperor Constantine to remove reincarnation from Christianity. ” (source: http://kuriakon00.tripod.com/reincarnation/kuriakon_reincarnation.htm) The prostitute turned empress and her various ecclesiastical henchmen engineered this action, who imprisoned the elderly then-pope (when he refused to summon the council) and therefore sent him for six months to a forced labor camp until he agreed to sign the rulings of the unlawful council. It was also at that time that nearly all of Origen's famous writings, a "Church Father" who wrote (among other things) about the truth of recycling of néphesh (“reincarnation”), aka “transmutation,” were collected and systematically burned. We became aware of his doctrines only because of a few remaining manuscripts, plus many references to his work in other "Church Fathers" texts. The idea that a néphesh would go through many lifetimes, recycling, on a journey towards a possible relationship with Yâ-hwéh Yâhuwshúa` to arrive at a final decision and return to Oneness with the Most High was only too dangerous to the power-hungry empress’ schemes to be permitted. And so, we were all victimized to become ignorant of this by the sordid history of the Church, including the corruption and oppression caused by the Roman Catholic Church, by their suppression of anything Hebrew and their non-Hebrew cultures and traditions. Many recycling-deniers would argue that the primary purpose of the Fifth Ecumenical Council of Constantinople (held in 553 A.D.) was to ease the tensions in the Church caused by the Council of Chalcedon 100 years prior to that; however, the council had convened to discuss the subject of transmutation of the néphesh (“soul”): recycling. Please, read THE ANATHEMATISMS OF THE EMPEROR JUSTINIAN AGAINST ORIGEN. (1): Number II. here: https://sourcebooks.fordham.edu/basis/const2.asp We defer to "The Formation of the New Testament Canon" by Richard Carrier (2000), visible at https://infidels.org/library/modern/richard_carrier/NTcanon.html Carrier's research paper highlights the political schisms within the early (post-apostolic) Church that warred over what was sound doctrine and what allegedly wasn't, and it exposes the lack of objectivity used to choose which books made it into the Bible and which ones didn't, and it records how the evolving Roman Catholic Church mainly determined what books the Bible we now have would contain. Church History of Suppressing the Concept of Recycling One common reason that Christians disagree is due to the doctrine of the alleged flawlessness of their Bible. This is something which was also drilled into me for decades; however, the massive alterations, the poor translations, and the enormous omissions of what they did not desire to include in it, make it clear that it’s not THEIR translation of the Bible which is the inspired scripture without error that we cannot deny, rather, those are the originals prior to all the changes they made. And subsequently, they base their false teachings upon bad translations and alterations made to support their false teachings, and Truth gets denied. The popular protest raised by Bible-believing Christians to the idea of “reincarnation” (recycling) is based on one verse, and one verse alone: KJV Hebrews 9:27. KJV Hebrews 9: 27 has long been a Christian traditionalist mainstay to defend their belief system of having only one life to live, but to choose their eternal destiny of heaven or hell. They even claim that Yâhuwshúa` spoke against recycling of the néphesh in “John 8:23” and that supposedly 1 “Corinthians” 15:47 supports that claim. Tragically, as with many other verses within their corrupted scriptures, over-reliance on its alleged flawlessness has influenced scholars’ interpretations and has concealed to them what this verse really says, so even other translations of this scripture echoes their mistakes, whether in the KJV, NIV, NASV, or any other of the central English translations. And usually, it’s quoted out of context to be even more misleading, as: 27. And as it is appointed unto men once to die, but after this the judgment: Surely if this were a flawless rendition, recycling would be debunked, yet even their canon contains several accounts of people who died once and were resurrected in the same body, dying later again physically generally, so the “once” term is wrong; and the néphesh that inhabited both the dirt-bodies of ‘’ËliyYâ´huw (“Elijah”), and Yâhuwchânân the Immerser (“John the Baptist”) was in these two separate vessels as recorded in scripture, without a “judgment” after it either, so this alone should define with certainty that Hebrews 9:27 is yet another mistranslated verse. Any interpreter will vouch that it’s impossible to translate something the interpreter does not understand, so we see in the context of Hebrews 9:27 many concepts their translators had not known, due to their self-imposed ignorance of many scriptural truths, so they could not understand it to translate it correctly. Yet, in short, here is how Hebrews 9:27, in context, should be translated, and for a study giving a thorough explanation with evidence of why this is a correct translation, see this link . To the `Ivríym Chapter 9 24. Because not into handmade “pure places” did He Who the Anointed One enter into, counterparts of the ones of the true ones; rather, into the same one the One heaven now, to manifest Himself with the One, with the external appearance of the One of the Power on behalf of us, 25. but not in order that frequently He should bring Himself, as however much he who the high priest enters into the one “pure places” yearly within, with the bloodshed belonging to another; [ ~sâţâ´n ] 26. since then it would have necessary for Him frequently to suffer from the founding of the cosmos (material universe). But now, once only , over the completion of the Ones of the eternal ones, for the abolition of the error [ ~sâţâ´n ] , by means of the one’s [~the error’s (sâţâ´n/Yehuwthâ´h)] slaughter of the same One, He has been made manifest, 27. and according to how many He reserves for Himself: [~He manifests] to the ones belonging to the sons of the dirt-man (’âthâ´m) [ ~not servants of the name (1 Moshéh 3: 20)], once only , to die off, but amidst this thing, [is] the separation/selection [ ~144,000] [~at Sixth Seal] 28. thus [is] also he [ ~of the selection ] the anointed One, once only , having been brought to Him, for the One ‘ to carry up the errors of the many ones’ outside [ ~outside Yisrâ’ë´l – times of the witnesses ] . Of the second time, separated apart of the error He shall be seen, belonging to the ones [being] Him, the ones being patiently waited for, for the deliverance. The Mishandling of Recycling in the Hands of Pseudoscience Those fascinated by the material world and studying it to know how material works are called scientists. Yet many fields of material science are notoriously unreliable because they contain much influence from the spiritual dimension, of which material scientists deny the existence of a spiritual world. In psychology and psychiatry, this is so bad that even the materially-minded laugh at its unreliability, so we call the material study of spiritual things pseudoscience. Yet there are now growing numbers of extraordinarily reputable and scientific research investigations documenting past lives being conducted by some of the world's top psychologists and psychiatrists, particularly with the memories of the experiences of children’s previous lives. But these material scientists fail to know the spiritual facts about why this happens because of its suppression by this world’s Christian religious authorities. The late physician Dr. Ian Stevenson, department head at the University of Virginia for four decades, and psychologist Dr. Brian Weiss and now by Jim B. Tucker together have identified more than 2500 cases which consist of children whose memories, specific knowledge, habits behaviors match those of particular individuals who were dead before the children were born. Many of the children had unique birthmarks, scars, or congenital defects that mimic wounds, in the exact location, on the bodies of the deceased individual. Many people ascertain having lived before their current life; these recollections are referred to as the return of the “soul” recycling, not as reincarnation. Some illnesses, physical deformities, and symptoms are encoded in our minds. Dr. Stevenson refers to his book “Reincarnation and Biology,” a case of a youngster who had disturbing graphic memories from a previous life. The young man had developed rope marks in the area where he suffered an injury in an earlier life. If a person’s mind can cause physical marks to appear on his or her dirt-body, recollections of a previous existence manifest with imprints on the present body, said Dr. Stevenson. Various birthmarks appear to identify with traumatic experiences in past lives—and these recollections blur as the memories fade. It is a reality that unless one begins to manage aberration built up in past lives, one will not progress in The Way. However, Yâ-hwéh Yâhuwshúa` urges us to “know the self” and gives us the tools through Him to handle upsets and aberrations from past lives that adversely affect one’s self in the present (life), thus freeing one to live a much happier material existence in Him. In the case of the author, this is the birthmark evidencing the fatal wound in my previous life, described above There is also a notable four-part video series on YouTube.com documenting the incredible tale of Louisiana's little James Leininger — through thorough interviews with his parents; his dad was a skeptic from the beginning but was persuaded after comprehensive studies; James' mom makes a remark to indicate they are likely Christians. You can download the case of The Case of James Leininger , documented by the University of Virginia. Dr. Paul Von Ward, in his article on the “genome,” writes that when a person can master a skill or an art at a very young age, he or she has acquired these skills over various life cycles and might begin to exhibit these extraordinary ideas, skills, or interests at a very young age, without prior experience (in that current life). The most frequent answer is “savant’ or “prodigy” — while this provides a label, it does not offer an explanation. Many prodigies have a fragile nature, sometimes, their knowledge and skills coexist with a mental (spiritual) disability. The Erasure of Past-Life Memories As mentioned earlier, it is written in inspired scriptures "codices" that our previous life’s memories are erased by the rulers/archons/demons (aka “extraterrestrials/aliens”) of this material region. This is what happens after one's physical death (and the number one reason for their fear of death): Once the non-acknowledging néphesh exits the dirt-body, it arises spiritually naked; successively, the receivers of god[-ariēl], come and lead the néphesh out of the body and, depending on the chastisement, spend three days touring with it, along with its counterfeit spirit which accuses it, into all the regions to which that néphesh has traveled. Thereafter, that néphesh is taken down to Sh’ówl before Yaldabosheth (“spawn of shame”) to receive its beating with fiery (underworld's electrical-) whips. Afterward, that néphesh (“soul”) is given the cup of forgetfulness, filled with all the different desires and all forgetfulness, and straightaway, when the néphesh drinks out of the cup, it forgets all the regions (past-lives) which it has traveled and forgets all of the chastisements which it has experienced. Then the cup of forgetfulness becomes a body outside the néphesh, and it creates the fiery component, which resembles the néphesh in all its figures and makes itself become like it, which is what is called the counterfeit spirit. Finally, that néphesh is cast into the regions of the sphere, being thrust in a dirt-body to recycle. Inspired by The Second Book of the Savior “Pistis Sophia," A George Horner Literal Translation Within our self/nephesh we have all of our stored data as an open access journal, and it performs only familiar things to itself and does not stray from its character. In Sh’ówl, the nephesh vows never to err again, but after drinking the wine of forgetfulness, she is bound to a vicious cycle, continuing to eventually repeat her sins because she has drunk and has forgotten all her errors. The End of Recycling – Obtaining the Resurrection “ Do not expect, therefore, the carnal resurrection, which is destruction; and they are not stripped of it (the flesh) who err in expecting a resurrection that is empty .” - The Dialogue of the Savior "People who say they will first die and then arise [“resurrect”] are wrong. If they do not receive the Resurrection [Garment of Light] first, while they are [materially] alive, they will receive nothing when they die [arise naked]. So, it is said of [His] anointing, “Great is the anointing,” for if people receive it (Him), they will live." – Glad Tidings of Phílippos A Néphesh Arising (spiritually) Naked Garment, Man of Light, Little One, Envoy, Resurrection, etc., are a few of the terms used for our Spirit Companion in Yâ-hwéh Yâhuwshúa`. At the last Trumpet, being in our Garment of Light, we will become invisible and consume corruptibility, and even archon demons would not be able to apprehend us. It is written that the chosen ones (“elect”) have already received the Resurrection, and as the delegate said of Him, we suffered with Him, arose with Him, and ascended with Him. Since we currently are visibly present in this world, we are wearing the garment (dirt-body) of the world. But as Phílippos writes, we “are in this world, it is fitting for us to acquire the Resurrection (now ), so that when we strip off the flesh, we may be found in Rest and not walk (be found naked ) in the middle.” If we do, from the Savior, we radiate His Light like streams of Light and are sustained by Him until our material death in this cosmos; This is the resurrection of the spirit, which swallows up the resurrection of the flesh. All living beings contain within their 'self' something so unique and so distinctive to an individual identity, visible in the totalities of qualities that make such a person become unlike anyone else in the world, and that is their collective character - intelligence (“archon-knowledge”), temper, beliefs, etc., is what distinguishes a person from another. Our collective character (within) is contained inside our spiritual self/nephesh. So, suppose when making a decision about Yâ-hwéh Yâhuwshúa`, a person changes their mind and turns away (“repents”) from following after evil four-winds and the works of darkness when this same person suffers a material death. In that case, this person is bound to recycle again, acknowledging Yâ-hwéh Yâhuwshúa` in their life. Suppose a person dies without being called to accept Yâ-hwéh Yâhuwshúa`. In that case, this nephesh is bound to recycle from Sh’owl having the same mindset ('collective character') it had before, UNTIL Yâ-hwéh Yâhuwshúa` calls on it, during whatever capable nativity it has been thrust into a dirt body. Nevertheless, when a néphesh comes to exist acknowledging Him, the spirit of Truth, our Envoy Companion, is the One Who acts as our external-hard drive bringing up things from our antiquities (past lives) to our present memories when we need them because we cannot accomplish such massive tasks from our own accord without Yâ-hwéh Yâhuwshúa` , while sojourning in the matrix (matter/mother/material) world – which is a place of forgetfulness. Otherwise, a person who stores terrible behavioral patterns, such as the ways of Çthom (“Sodom”), in their nephesh before finding out the Truth is bound to repeat the same mistakes from a previous life over and over again. The natural END of recycling into corruptible dirt-bodies (the empty carnal resurrection of the rebirth into corruptible flesh) is our resurrection into incorruptible pure flesh spiritual bodies, which for most will occur after the death of the physical dirt-body. However, some will be transformed into it in the blink of an eye. Certainly, none of us will die or recycle after that. But believers in the Truth of Yâ-hwéh Yâhuwshúa` from the past generations have been recycling still. They are all going to be among us during these end times. They will be the 144,000 witnesses after the separation of the living from the dead, at the 6th seal, when while remaining still in mortal physical carnal bodies without their fiery ones, these will be His witnesses as sealed sons of Yâ-hwéh. That is the last lifetime these live in corruptible flesh, and these will ingest (convert) the heathen masses predicating 1260 days as being His witnesses. Then they and their sealed converts are killed, and after 3 ½ days, they will be resurrected and called up to Yâ-hwéh Yâhuwshúa`. A Néphesh Arising (spiritually) Naked Exposé – Warning Against Hypnosis Some believers in Yâ-hwéh Yâhuwshúa` reading this will legitimately desire to know who they were in previous lives, because their néphesh forgot, due to the cup of forgetfulness given by the demons before they recycled. If you are one of these, please understand that though your néphesh forgot, your twin, your envoy “little One” did not forget, and He retains all those memories. So, the proper way to recall is to supplicate Yâ-hwéh Yâhuwshúa` through prayer for these to be told to you, and that will be reliable. It is an improper way and unreliable to utilize hypnosis to recollect such information because hypnosis is mediated by the evil spirits which are riders of the person hypnotized, and though some information may be true, it will contain deception due to the source, and misinformation. One should not meddle therefore with this mode of paranormal/supernatural information inquiry, which voluntarily deepens the néphesh’s imprisonment to its cohabiting evil spirits. Therefore, we believe hypnosis is never a useful tool, we deplore the commercial exploitation and misleading claims that are often made for it. A large part of what emerges under hypnosis is archon-led. We also discourage consultations with psychics, gurus, spiritual mediums or teachers, savants or any persons who claim to have the ability to help assist one in remembering one’s previous lives. And every eye will see Him, even those recycled-ones who pierced Him! Conclusion: Enforced ignorance perpetuates the power of darkness. Satan, the lord of death, uses the silence of the dead to try to maximize the darkness. But the loss of knowledge through death and the forgetfulness of recycling has not been the only way the demons have tried to keep the children of Light from emerging. Their servants tried to erase even this recycling phenomenon from common knowledge. Knowledge of Truth makes us invulnerable to being deceived, and our sharing this information can capacitate you to overcome the demons’ ploys to perpetuate their slavery of mankind, keeping us ignorant of the Truth of Yâ-hwéh Yâhuwshúa` which sets us free and overcomes them in every way. Their cup of forgetfulness and their establishment’s alterations of scripture, book burning, persecutions, and slaughters will not work against the Truth in this end-time generation, the Truth they sought to be kept hidden will be shouted from the rooftops. The children of the Light are all emerging again, recycling, to survive to accomplish a mission converting millions, while the worst of the worst have been recycling to continue to work the Transgression. Recycling is not our hope, Yâhuwshúa` our Resurrection is our Hope. Time (satan & measured time) comes to an end, and immortality ends death and recycling, and Yâ-hwéh will have made all of His own come to exist, permanently. But in the meantime, during the preceding thousands of years, recycling has given people second chances at hearing this Truth of Yâ-hwéh Yâhuwshúa`. May Yâ-hwéh Yâhuwshúa` continue to be praised always and forever. your brothers in Yâ-hwéh Yâhuwshúa` Disclaimer: We do not support the use of name-substitutes for Yâ-hwéh Yâhuwshúa` nor any false doctrines contained in the references below; however, we do recognize these authors as sincere truth-seekers whom He has led to do good work and much research, helpful to expose the works of sâţâ´n keeping truths hidden. Our hope is Yâ-hwéh Yâhuwshúa` leads the ones in Truth. Helpful Sources & Links Dedicated to the Reconciliation Between Recycling and Christianity Edward Reaugh Smith The Soul’s Long Journey: How the Bible Reveals Reincarnation BiblioWeiss, M.D., Many Lives, Many Masters ( WARNING AUTHOR FAILS TO REALIZE 'MASTERS' ARE DEMONS) Strong, James, Strong’s Exhaustive Concordance of the Bible, Nelson, Nashville, 1990) Tucker M.D., Jim B. Return to Life: Extraordinary Cases of Children Who Remember Past Life The Thirteenth Apostle - What the Gospel of Judas Really Says by April D. DeConick The Gospel of Judas Translated by Rodolphe Kasser, Marvin Meyer, and Gregor Wurst, in collaboration with François Gaudard The Apocalypse of Baruch: Translated from the Syriac Francis M. Concord. Plato’s Cosmology The Timaeus of Plato Yonassan Gershom. Jewish Tales of Reincarnation Geddes MacGregor. Reincarnation in Christianity Geddes MacGregor. Reincarnation as a Christian Hope “Pistis Sophia” The Second Book of Our Savior Paul Von Ward The Soul Genome: Science and Reincarnation Quincy Howe Jr. Reincarnation for the Christian Ian Stevenson, M.D. Reincarnation and Biology https://www.near-death.com/reincarnation/research/ian-stevenson.htm [free source now defunct, buy his book] http://www.iisis.net/index.php?page=walter-semkiw-ian-stevenson-society-for-scientific-exploration-sse&hl=en_US [now locked, but we'll keep the ref here] www.carolbowman.com/library/double-birthmarks/ https://www.theepochtimes.com/a-theory-on-how-birthmarks-could-correspond-to-wounds-from-past-lives_846178.html back to top He is The Way for those who strayed, He is Knowledge for those who were ignorant, He is the Treasure for those who sought Him, He is Support for those who tremble, He is Purity for those who were defiled. He is the Light for the those in darkness, He is Yâ-hwéh Yâhuwshúa` , our Redeemer, First-Love, Brother, and True friend. Yâhú !

  • Contact Us | Yâ-hwéh Yâhuwshúa`

    Feel free to to send us your questions relating to the website material or scriptures. CONTACT US for any scripture related questions Reach out! First Name* Last Name E-mail* Phone Write us a message! Send Are you a brother? Come join us! M.C: SONGS OF GREAT LIGHT FAQ LIVE: YahwehYahuwshua.org The Way of Yâ-hwéh Yâhuwshúa`! Our website works best with Chrome

  • Yâhuwshúa` is Yâ-hwéh | Yâ-hwéh Yâhuwshúa`

    Yâ-hwéh is our Savior (Shúa`), Who came down from the Highest Heavens, to deliver us from satan, the lower ruler. YAHUWSHÚA` IS YÂ-HWÉH Why do you say Yâhuwshúa` is Yâ-hwéh? Have you ever heard a Christian say, “Jesus is Lord”? Probably more often than with the definite article “Jesus is the Lord”, but if you simply capitalize what they say, King James Version style, they are saying “Jesus is the LORD”. Think about what it is they are trying to say, they are trying to say that the Anointed One Who came and lived a sinless life and gave His life on the cross and rose again and lives forever is the same One Who speaks throughout the scriptures you know as “the Old Testament”! It is a sad thing that few Christians saying this have actually thought this through, that it means that. But when we say Yâhuwshúa` is Yâ-hwéh, we are actually saying that the Anointed is the same Sovereign found throughout all scriptures, and we are saying it using His real names not the terms used in the King James Version and other scripture versions approved by this world’s establishment, which serves satan. So therefore, Christians saying “Jesus is Lord” shouldn’t have trouble with our saying Yâhuwshúa` is Yâ-hwéh, because it not only professes that the Anointed One is the Personhood of the Most High, but it says it using the proper names too. The Difference Between Yâhuwshúa`is Yâ-hwéh and “Jesus is Lord” Shouldn’t accuracy and correctness be important to us? Isn’t correctness and truth important to Him? Correctness is a modern term for the KJV term “Righteousness”. Do you want to be correct, “righteous” about His names? Error and Mistake is a modern term for the KJV term “Sin”. Do you want to err about His name, and “sin” about His names? Some people have been formed to immediately realize what’s wrong with changing the names of Who we worship. It changes Who we worship. Some people don’t take too well to being called something different by someone else. These are more likely to object to renaming Yâ-hwéh Yâhuwshúa`. But most people these days understand the concept of “identity theft”. The adversary has perpetrated massive amounts of identity theft, AND slander against Yâ-hwéh Yâhuwshúa`. And the degree of the deception is beyond the ability of most people to accept, so they go into denial. Traditional Christianity today has over 90% of its doctrines exchanged for satan’s information. So when a Christian today is happy and wants to pray and honor the Most High, sadly, all the credit and honor is being diverted to the most low, satan, because the terms being used are all about satan. Identity theft. What is The Difference Between Yâhuwshúa` and “Jesus” or “Yeshua”? Yâhuwshúa` is the only best way to transliterate and transcribe the true name of the Anointed One, whose name is easy to find in Hebrew. One doesn’t need to use supercomputers to find “bible codes” to find out what His name is. It is written in ZkharYâ´hu (“zechariah”) that one man’s name there was a portent of the name of the Branch. That man’s name was Yâhuwshúa` Bën-Yâhuwtsâthâ´q. Also, it is written in the Letter (Epistle) of Bar-Nâvíy (“Barnabas”) that Moshéh renamed his servant Howshë´`á “Yâhuwshua`” in order that Yisrâ’ë´l would listen to him. This KJV “Joshua” is actually the name Yâhuwshúa`, and that name’s spelling is the same. Further evidence that Yâhuwshúa` is the proper rendition of this name is finding that “Joshua” appears more than once in the KJV “New Testament” written as “Jesus”. This means that Yâhuwshúa`’s name is the one which went through the mill to become “Jesus”. This means that everywhere you might find “Jesus” written, it should be restored to Yâhuwshúa`, to be correct (“righteous”) and not in error (“sin”). You may have seen the name written in lexicons or Schofield reference notes as “Yehoshua”. Yâhuwshúa` gets altered by the jewish scribes to falsely read “yehowshua”/“yehoshua”. This they do in order to comply with a religious rule they have, to alter any name beginning in Yâhuw- to Yehow- in order to avoid saying the name of Yâ-hwéh, because the short form of the name Yâ-hwéh is Yâ´hu, which can appear in the beginning or at the end of names in Hebrew. But as you see with NetanYahuw, they don’t object to keep it intact at the end of a name. It is wrong to avoid saying His name. Scripture says we ought all to boastfully praise His name openly and publicly, and this is the meaning of Háleluw Yâ´hu! The name Yâhuwshúa`, when written in Hebrew, appears as Y-H-W-Sh-`. This name cannot spell “Yeshua” because “Yeshua” is written Y-Sh-`, and it does not contain the two extra letters. Moreover, there are several verses in scripture we have found to denounce a “Yeshua”, meaning that this false name “Yeshua” will be one name used for the impostor to come, commonly called the “antichrist”. But there is even much more evidence about “Jesus” being a name for this impostor to come, even the Greek spelling of the letters 666 sounds like "Jesus". Who is Yâ-hwéh? The Most High is Yâ-hwéh. He is both the Father AND the Son. The only One Who can completely contain the Father is the Son. The Son referred to the Father as His Own Greatness. To understand this better, consider the Father as the Greatness, the Power, the Honor, the Love, the Light, the Life, the Goodness of Yâ-hwéh, Which is illimitable, undefinable in any number of words, uncontainable in our minds, beyond our comprehension, and better than we could ever imagine. And consider the Son as His Image, His Being, His Néphesh (mistranslated as "soul"), His Servant, His Personhood in fact. To know more about "The Crafty Use of Synonyms" done by His adversary, to confuse our language, watch our video What is the Sun . The terms “father” and “son” are limited in the application to Him to refer to His relationship to His own Power, and one should not apply the biological aspects to this. This explanat ion is supported by all inspired scriptures, particularly when correctly translated. Not one contradicts it, unless mistranslated. Are You Sure Yâ-hwéh is The Correct Rendering of His Name? People outside Him have seen the Hebrew transcription of this name Yâ-hwéh as YHWH and not wanting to pronounce it, named that transcription tetragrammaton in Greek, barbelo in Aramaic, when scripture says in Chanówkh to not abbreviate His names. Other people see YHWH and, not knowing Hebrew linguistics, put in the wrong vowels. To read an in-depth study about the true linguistics, please read here . The satanic scribes wrote in the wrong vowels into YHWH in their altered scriptures, to correspond with their false tradition to say, “adonay elohim” (my sovereign the daemon ones) and produced “yehowah” which evolved to “Jehovah”. But this itself has an evil meaning in Hebrew which identifies satan. What is the importance of saying Yâhuwshúa` is Yâ-hwéh? Romans 10: 9-10 makes clear that this is the Good Saying, which one must profess with one’s mouth in order to be saved. It is not enough to believe in one’s heart that the Power raised Him from the dead, that justifies one, and this surely is important, but to be saved, one must profess Yâhuwshúa` is Yâ-hwéh to be saved. Surely most Christians believe enough to be justified, but these do not profess His names to be saved. And to say this saving testimony correctly, one must have both names correct. Else one is saying someone else is Yâ-hwéh, or that Yâhuwshúa` is someone else. That won’t work. Below there is an audio showing you how to properly pronounce His names, because the names are a call, a sound, which if spoken wrong, does not call Him. Listen to this and try to imitate what you hear, and see why we spelled it “Yâhuwshúa` is Yâ-hwéh”. TO LEARN TO CALL ON HIS TRUE NAMES, LISTEN TO THE SAVING TESTIMONY The Saving Testimony Brothers in Yâhuwshúa` 00:00 Y âhuwshúa` is Yâ-hwéh: Accept NO Substitutes!

  • Eschatology Disclaimer | Yâ-hwéh Yâhuwshúa`

    This disclaimer explains the correct approach a student of end-times prophecy should take when reading any end-times predictions. ESCHATOLOGY DISCLAIMER OUR DISCLAIMER ABOUT END-TIME PROPHECY STUDIES, INCLUDING THE 70TH WEEK Of Dâ´niyyë´’l CALENDAR AND THE HISTORY OF MAN Why are there so many end-time theories? Why should time matter at all? Eschatology , the study of end-time prophecy, is a study that has been blocked in every way possible by the forces of evil who want ignorance to prevail for their imprisonment by deception to continue. They promote their well-known and popularly respected versions to prevent the acknowledgment of the Truth. Their deceit ranges from altering and coding the scriptures and not including it in their canon, to inventing and altering false calendar versions. Yet the truth is that scriptures when restored to their original meanings are eternal and not about this temporary and material realm of darkness. And time itself is one of the dimensions confining this other realm, not the realm of Light, and the terms defined here as time-related are in truth, not about time. But when coded, they are altered by the authorities of this other place, to try to foil Him but our Father the Most High Yâ-hwéh Yâhuwshúa` has fulfilled all the laws of the adversary for all time, and the very star which the adversary occupied and calls “the sun” is counting down the “days”, “weeks” and “months” till the end of him and this entire realm of darkness. Lest one might lose sight of this fact, because of all the above, all inspired scriptures, as originally written, are an eternal testimonial of the loving works of our Savior, our Father, creating, forming, retaining, and saving all that even indirectly came from Him. Why did we work to clarify the end-timetable? The purpose of our maintaining this eschatological calendar is for it to stand for your awareness of the purpose of particular dates as mentioned in the coded scriptures, not for one to prepare for them in any material way, but for brothers to awaken and align their walk with Him as soon as possible, when informed. It is not to try to prevent any of the events, as the adversary wished but cannot, being defeated. Thus, this calendar cannot make a difference for people who, because of their particular vessels, are destined to arrive later, not sooner, except for their later retrospection. And because of the spiritual composition of most people, even if being fully informed prior to it, like by this calendar or purified scriptures, those are simply unable to avoid some unpleasantness in the process towards their deliverance to endless Light, and more joy for those higher than those lower. Therefore this calendar is for those higher to help these secure their joy, though it cannot alter the destiny of those who must cooperate with the adversary before being able to change their mind. How is this calendar different and why? Based on the best interpretation of coded scripture’s description of timekeeping, and accurate astronomical data, the calendar date is determined by assigning the crucifixion date to the creation year 4001 , resurrection date as 6001 , and determining the crucifixion date by the scriptural historical information about which weekday the Exemption Day: the fourteenth day of the first month, was that year on a fourth day of the week. This happened in Roman years AD 27, 30 , and 33 . We also ascertained the birthdate of our Savior Yâhuwshúa` to have been 5 B.C., Who was crucified at age 33 ½, as extracanonical inspired scriptures document. But the Roman calendar mistook the year as 33, and the prophecy in Hosea as being from His birth, which explains why Y2K was premature and nothing happened. The Jewish calendar deliberately changed their calendar year after Yâhuwshúa`’s resurrection to deny Him. But based on the date of birth we ascertained, we determined the crucifixion year to be AD 30, and based the calendar dates on that. Could you (we) be mistaken? Skepticism is healthy, but know that the Truth has been the foremost target of the deceiver. It would be tragic for one who avoided all his lies to nonetheless disbelieve the Truth when finally finding it. Yes, we are still working at restoring scriptures. Details about events will become more available in our ongoing scripture translation. Do not expect the material version of KJV’s “Book of Revelation” to be materially fulfilled. The Majority will not see most of what is actually described, because their scriptures are altered severely. The first thing our Savior said to watch for is in Luke 21:20-22, and we are seeing the anger growing now. In the end-time, the chosen awaken, and The Mother flows again —not separate, but within Yâ-hwéh Yâhuwshúa` , guiding His own back to His Light.

YAHUWSHUA.ORG's SUCCESSOR WEBSITE - KNOWLEDGE WILL INCREASE! 2026 RD

  • Youtube
  • Telegram - The Way The Truth The Life
bottom of page